THE OLIVE-BRANCH AND EQUAL RIGHTS.

And has not the time arrived when in sincerity we should accept the

olive-branch? Is it not time for the pen to take the place of the

sword? Is it not time for the Executive Mansion to be changed from

a barrack cesspool to a life-giving fountain? Is it not time for a

President who will show by example the importance of reform, and teach

the duty of subordinating personal objects to the public service? Is

it not time for the Head of the National Government to represent the

idea of peace and reconciliation, rather than of battle and strife?

Is it not time for that new era, when ancient enemies, forgetting the

past, shall “clasp hands” in true unity with the principles of the

Declaration of Independence as the supreme law? Deploring the fate

of Poland and of Ireland, I seize the earliest moment to escape from

similar possibility here. Mindful that the memories of the Past can

only yield to a happy Present, something would I do to promote this

end. Anxious for the Equal Rights of All, and knowing well that no

text of Law or Constitution is adequate without a supporting sentiment

behind, I cannot miss the opportunity afforded by the present election

of obtaining this strength for our great guaranties.

Reconstruction is now complete. Every State is represented in

the Senate, and every District is represented in the House of

Representatives. Every Senator and every Representative is in his

place. There are no vacant seats in either Chamber; and among the

members are fellow-citizens of the African race. And amnesty, nearly

universal, has been adopted. In this condition of things I find new

reason for change. The present incumbent knows little of our frame of

government. By military education and military genius he represents the

idea of Force; nor is he any exception to the rule of his profession,

which appreciates only slightly a government that is not arbitrary.

The time for the soldier has passed, especially when his renewed power

would once more remind fellow-citizens of their defeat. Victory over

fellow-citizens should be known only in the rights it assures; nor

should it be flaunted in the face of the vanquished. It should not

be inscribed on regimental colors, or portrayed in pictures at the

National Capitol. But the present incumbent is a regimental color with

the forbidden inscription; he is a picture at the National Capitol

recalling victories over fellow-citizens. It is doubtful if such a

presence can promote true reconciliation. Friendship does not grow

where former differences are thrust into sight. There are wounds of the

mind as of the body; these, too, must be healed. Instead of irritation

and pressure, let there be gentleness and generosity. Men in this

world get only what they give,--prejudice for prejudice, animosity

for animosity, hate for hate. Likewise confidence is returned for

confidence, good-will for good-will, friendship for friendship. On

this rule, which is the same for the nation as for the individual, I

would now act. So will the Republic be elevated to new heights of moral

grandeur, and our people will manifest that virtue, “greatest of all,”

which is found in charity. Above the conquest of others will be the

conquest of ourselves. Nor will any fellow-citizen suffer in rights,

but all will find new safeguard in the comprehensive fellowship.

NO NAMES OF BATTLES WITH FELLOW-CITIZENS ON THE ARMY-REGISTER OR THE

REGIMENTAL COLORS OF THE UNITED STATES.

Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 20 (of 20) · 第 154 / 242 题