NEPOTISM.

Nepotism is already condemned by history, and most justly; for it is

obviously a form of self-seeking, hostile to purity of government,

and strangely out of place in a Republic. Nothing for self, but

all for country and mankind, should be the rule of our President.

If the promptings of his inner nature fail, then must he feel the

irresistible obligation of his position. As he does, so will others

do; and therefore must his example be such as to elevate the public

service. Nothing in Washington’s career has shone with more constant

light than his refusal to confer office on his relations. Even at the

time, it arrested attention not only at home but abroad, landing praise

in England. Of this there is a striking illustration. The “Register

of the Times,” published at London in 1795, in an article entitled

“Interesting and Authentic Documents respecting the United States of

America,” records its homage:--

“The execution of the office of the Chief Magistrate has been

attended through a term of four years with a circumstance which

to an admiring world requires no commentary. A native citizen of

the United States, transferred from private life to that station,

has not, during so long a term, appointed a single relation to any

office of honor or emolument.”[178]

With such confession an admiring world looked on. Something would I

do--something, I trust, the American people will do at the coming

election--to secure this beautiful praise yet again for our country.

Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 20 (of 20) · 第 135 / 242 题