DUTY OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY.

And now the question of Duty is distinctly presented to the Republican

Party. I like that word. It is at the mandate of Duty that we must

act. Do the Presidential pretensions merit the sanction of the party?

Can Republicans, without departing from all obligations, whether

of party or patriotism, recognize our ambitious Cæsar as a proper

representative? Can we take the fearful responsibility of his prolonged

empire? I put these questions solemnly, as a member of the Republican

Party, with all the earnestness of a life devoted to the triumph of

this party, but which I served always with the conviction that I

gave up nothing that was meant for country or mankind. With me, the

party was country and mankind; but with the adoption of all these

Presidential pretensions the party loses its distinctive character and

drops from its sphere. Its creed ceases to be Republicanism and becomes

Grantism; its members cease to be Republicans and become Grant-men. It

is no longer a _political_ party, but a _personal_ party. For myself, I

say openly, I am no man’s _man_, nor do I belong to any personal party.

Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 20 (of 20) · 第 88 / 242 题