APPROPRIATION OF THE OFFICES.

Marked among the spectacles which followed, and kindred in character

with the appropriation of the Cabinet as individual property, was

the appropriation of the offices of the country, to which I refer in

this place even at the expense of repetition. Obscure and undeserving

relations, marriage connections, personal retainers, army associates,

friends of unknown fame and notable only as personal friends or friends

of his relations, evidently absorbed the Presidential mind during

those months of obdurate reticence when a generous people supposed

the Cabinet to be the all-absorbing thought. Judging by the facts, it

would seem as if the chief and most spontaneous thought was how to

exploit the appointing power to his own personal behoof. At this period

the New York Custom-House presented itself to the imagination, and a

letter was written consigning a military dependant to the generosity of

the Collector. You know the rest. Dr. Johnson, acting as executor in

selling the distillery of Mr. Thrale, said: “We are not here to sell a

parcel of boilers and vats, but the potentiality of growing rich beyond

the dreams of avarice.”[118] If the President did not use the sounding

phrase of the great English moralist, it is evident that his military

dependant felt in that letter all the “potentiality” advertised in the

earlier case, and acted accordingly.

It is not necessary to say that in these things there was departure

from the requirements of law, whether in the appointment of his Cabinet

or of personal favorites, even in return for personal benefactions,

although it was plainly unrepublican, offensive, and indefensible. But

this same usurping spirit, born of an untutored egotism, brooking no

restraint, showed itself in another class of transactions, to which I

have already referred, where Law and Constitution were little regarded.

Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 20 (of 20) · 第 74 / 242 题