THE PRESIDENCY A PERQUISITE.

I have now completed the survey of the two typical instances--Nepotism,

and Gift-Taking with repayment by office--in which we are compelled

to see the President. In these things he shows himself. Here is no

portrait drawn by critic or enemy; it is the original who stands

forth, saying: “Behold the generosity I practise to my relations at

the expense of the public service! also the gifts I take, and then

my way of rewarding the patrons, always at the expense of the public

service!” In this open exhibition we see how the Presidency, instead

of a trust, has become a perquisite. Bad as are these two capital

instances, and important as is their condemnation, so that they may not

become a precedent, I dwell on them now as illustrating character. A

President who can do such things, and not recognize at once the error

he has committed, shows that supereminence of egotism under which

Constitution, International Law, and Municipal Law, to say nothing of

Republican Government in its primary principles, are all subordinated

to the Presidential will; and this is Personal Government. Add an

insensibility to the honest convictions of others, and you have a

natural feature of this pretension.

Lawyers cite what are called “Leading Cases.” A few of these show the

Presidential will in constant operation with little regard to precedent

or reason, so as to be a caprice, if it were not a pretension.

Imitating the Popes in Nepotism, the President has imitated them in

ostentatious assumption of Infallibility.

Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 20 (of 20) · 第 71 / 242 题