Now see, Senators, how this applies to the present case,--

“If a former generation could have foreseen that the liberal

views which far-sighted men among them held on the subject of

a park which should embrace both banks of the Schuylkill would

finally ripen into a fruition beyond what the most sanguine could

then have dreamed, the great railways which now run in close

proximity to that stream would have reached the city by other

routes, or at least would have been carried on tracks more remote

from the river. At that day this could readily have been done

without conflicting with any interest; but now that the conditions

have been long established, and trade and travel settled in

conformity to them, any violent change must be regarded as out of

the question.”[42]

The Commissioners then make certain recommendations, which I will not

take up time to read. But I come to a brief passage:--

“The Commissioners, therefore, respectfully but strenuously

urge that steps shall be immediately taken to promote this most

desirable end. And they do this not alone in the interest of the

thousands whose vehicles are entangled at the railroad-crossing,

but much more in the interest of the hundreds of thousands

whose principal enjoyment of the Park has been and will be in

that portion of it which is most exposed to these dangerous

annoyances.”[43]

That is testimony. If this were a court of justice instead of

the Senate, and if you, Sir, were a court and the Senators now

before me were a jury, that would be a testimony conclusive in the

case,--testimony of experts, who know by experience what they testify,

who have seen with their own eyes and felt in their own consciousness,

whenever they entered that park, the nuisance against which I now

protest. Sir, they testify against the present bill. Can you answer the

testimony? Is it not clear? Is it not complete?

Sir, I need no testimony. I only ask Senators to look at the Park. Let

them pass through our Library and take their stand on that unequalled

portico from which they may look down upon an amphitheatre more like

that of ancient Rome than that of any other capital, with a river

beneath and hills in the distance,--a river much larger than the

ancient Tiber, and hills much more beautiful than those that stand

about Rome,--and a Capitol, too, but how much more beautiful than that

which once gave the law to mankind! Stand on that portico, Sir, and

survey the amphitheatre; your eye will then rest with satisfaction on

the outline of this very Park, stretching from the Capitol beyond the

Executive Mansion, and destined to be a breathing-place for the immense

population of future generations. Stand on that portico and try to

imagine what this Park may be.

And now it is proposed not only to diminish that breathing-place, but

to disturb it by the smoke of steam-engines, and to confuse it by

the perpetual din of locomotives. I hope no such thing will be done.

There is a place for all things; and this I know, the place for a

railway-station is not a public park.

Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 20 (of 20) · 第 48 / 242 题