WILLIAM BRADFORD.

_Manor of Moreland, Philadelphia County, March 15, 1783._

Having been called upon by General Cadwalader respecting a

report which has been propagated concerning Mr. Joseph Reed--I

declare on my honour, the circumstances are as follows. In the

spring of 1780, I obtained permission for an interview with my

brother at Elizabethtown. In the course of conversation, one

day, he happened to mention that there were men among us, who

held the first offices, who applied for protection from the

British while they lay in New Jersey. I was alarmed at this

assertion, and insisted on knowing who they were;--he said,

that when the British army lay in Jersey, in 1776, Count Donop

commanded at Bordentown; that he was often at that officer's

quarters, and possessed some degree of his confidence; that

one day, _an inhabitant came into their lines, with an

application from Mr. Joseph Reed, the purport of which was, to

know whether he could have protection for himself and his

property_, (there was another person included in the

_application_, whose _name_ it is not necessary here to

mention.) The man was immediately ordered for execution, but

it was prevented by the interposition of my brother and some

other persons, who had formerly known him. Perhaps Mr. Reed

and his friends may say, that Count Donop would not have

ordered the man executed, had he not thought he came for

intelligence. No doubt that officer would have justified his

conduct by putting upon the footing of a spy, but why was

another person included in the application, and one who was

not looked on as a trifling character? his name I will mention

to any one who will apply to me; however, my brother said, the

man who was sent with the application was a poor peasant, and

the most unfit person in the world to send for intelligence;

this argument was what had weight with Count Donop, and which

saved his life.[I] These circumstances being mentioned by a

brother, and which he declared to be true, naturally produced

an alteration in my sentiments of Mr. Reed; for previous to

this, there were few men of whom I entertained so high an

opinion. On my return to Philadelphia, I made no secret of

what I heard; indeed, I thought it my duty to mention it

publicly, that it might prevent further power being put into

the hands of a man who might make a bad use of it. The report

circulated daily, and I was often called on to mention the

circumstances, which I always did, and which I should have

done to Mr. Reed, had he applied to me. I remember, among the

number who came to me, was Major Thomas Moore, who said he

intended to inform Mr. Reed; but whether he did or not, I

cannot pretend to say.

There is another thing I wish to mention. My brother came into

the river in a flag of truce, on special application of our

commissary of prisoners, to take a number of prisoners who

were exchanged, to save us the expense and trouble of sending

them by land; this was in the month of May, 1781. He was

detained, about nine miles below the city, upwards of four

weeks, and never permitted to visit it, although application

was made for that purpose, by several captains of vessels, who

had been prisoners, and to whom he had rendered civilities. I

declined making application myself, as I supposed my being in

the service from the commencement of the war, and having

endured a rigorous confinement for eighteen months, in the

worst of times, to have been sufficient to have obtained

permission for a brother to have been in my house, in

preference to a cabin in a small vessel in a river;--however,

I endeavoured to make his situation as agreeable as possible,

by visiting him often, and by taking my friends with me. I

REMEMBER Col. Francis Nichols went with me one day, to whom my

brother mentioned Mr. Reed's intended desertion, and who, I

doubt not, will acknowledge it, on any person's applying to

him; he is at present in Virginia, but is expected in town in

a few days.

Nuts for Future Historians to Crack · 第 31 / 53 题