WHAT IS EDUCATION?

My last chapter, like the first, begins with a question. Strange to say,

no satisfactory definition of education has yet been given, nor has a

definition of it often been even attempted. The literature of the

subject is copious enough. But writers have busied themselves mainly

with details, with methods of teaching, and so forth. A few, of a more

philosophical turn of mind, have discussed the principles of the

subject, and among these some have undertaken to develop their theories

from the true starting-point of a definition. But among all these, from

Plato, who was the earliest systematic writer on the subject, to Herbert

Spencer, the latest and the most pretentious, not one has given a

definition of it which is not open to objection.

It may seem presumptuous, perhaps, to undertake again that in which so

many have failed. But there can be no harm in making at least an

endeavor. What then are some of the elements which enter into our idea

of education?

To educate is, in the first place, to develop. It is to draw out and

strengthen the powers and give them right direction. It is, therefore,

something more than merely imparting knowledge. Knowledge is to the

child's mind what food is to the body. Each is a means to an end. It is

to cause growth. As by the proper use of food and exercise the limbs and

muscles expand, and acquire their full and appointed size, symmetry, and

strength, so by acquiring and using knowledge of various kinds, the

various faculties of the mind attain their full power and proportion.

For this reason mainly the pure mathematics and the ancient languages,

Latin and Greek, have held their place in almost every course of liberal

study, not because the knowledge of these branches is likely to be

called for in ordinary professional business, but because the study of

these branches is supposed to be particularly adapted to develop and

invigorate certain important qualities of the mind. This development of

the powers, then, is the first element involved in a just idea of

education.

But, secondly, nature plainly indicates a certain order to be observed

in the development of the faculties. "First the blade, then the ear,

after that the full corn in the ear." So in the human plant. The time

for the efflorescence of some of the faculties is in early youth. Other

faculties make little growth till near the age of manhood. A wise

educator will carefully observe these facts, and not waste his energies

and mar his work, either by attempting a premature development of those

faculties which God seems to have meant to ripen later, or by neglecting

to draw out and train in childhood those faculties which then most

naturally and aptly spring into vigorous growth. Youth, for instance, is

the season, of all others, when the memory is to be cultivated; the

season of all others, when the instinctive principle of faith is to have

free play. So, too, the moral and emotional faculties may receive the

first germs of their development at a very early stage in the history of

the human being. The education of this part of our nature begins,

indeed, with the first smile of recognition that passes between the

infant and its mother. Other faculties and powers, as the reason and the

judgment, for instance, come to maturity nearer the age of manhood, and

the normal period for their cultivation is accordingly near the end,

rather than near the beginning, of an educational course. It is not,

however, my object here to mark out an order for the development of the

faculties, but only to note that there is such an order, and that the

observance of this order is a most important element in our idea of what

education is.

The next element in this idea is that a certain proportion and symmetry

be observed in the development of the powers. Perhaps it might not be

strictly accurate to say that any faculty may be cultivated too highly.

Yet there certainly is an excess whenever one faculty or power is

cultivated quite out of proportion to the other faculties and powers. A

man in Boston a few years ago, by directing his attention exclusively

for a long time to the single act of lifting, educated his body to the

power of lifting enormous weights. But this power was gained at the

expense of agility, grace, and many other bodily qualities quite as

important as that of lifting weights. So the mental faculties may become

one-sided by injudicious training. The memory may be inordinately

developed at the expense of the reasoning power, the reason at the

expense of the imagination, the feelings at the expense of the judgment,

the mind at the expense of the body, the body at the expense of the

mind. In all right education, therefore, the faculties are to be

developed, not only in due order, but in due proportion.

The next element that enters into our idea is that of a proper

comprehensiveness. The educator must bear in mind that the being

committed to his care is one of a complex nature, and that every part of

this complex nature is to receive its due attention. Physical education

is included in his duties as well as mental, mental as well as moral and

religious. No part is to be neglected. He should aim to secure for his

subject full bodily health, agility, strength, symmetry, and power of

endurance. The bodily senses are capable of a degree of cultivation that

few seem to be aware of. Perhaps, in our ordinary schemes of education,

no part of our complex nature is so inadequately provided for, so almost

ignored, as the physical. But, as in regard to the other points that

have been raised, so here, it is not my object so much to particularize

the several parts of human nature that require attention, as to

recognize distinctly the fact that we are thus complex, and that the

business of the educator is necessarily a many-sided one, requiring most

varied knowledge and experience.

But there is one important limitation to be observed here, otherwise our

definition would be seriously amiss. In many works on education, it is

stated, without qualification, that we ought to give to all our powers

the fullest development of which they are capable. If we were unfallen

angels, the rule might perhaps be a safe one. But for fallen human

beings, it certainly needs some limitation. We have faculties and

powers, not a few, which we need to repress rather than to cultivate.

Are we to give the fullest development of which they are capable, to

anger, envy, jealousy, cunning, avarice, and lust? To state the question

is to answer it. It is not every faculty of the child, therefore, that

is to be developed, but only those parts of his nature which are good

and desirable, those by which he can best discharge his duties to God

and attain his highest excellence as a man.

Let us now gather up the several ideas which have been suggested, and

see if we cannot compress them into some brief formula, as a definition

of education, which, if not perfect and exhaustive of the subject, shall

be both more comprehensive and more precise than those now afloat.

Definition.--Education is developing, in due order and proportion,

whatever is good and desirable in human nature.

In the School-Room: Chapters in the Philosophy of Education · 第 74 / 94 题