PRACTICE-TEACHING.

One feature of a Normal School which distinguishes it especially from

other schools, is the opportunity given to its matriculants for

practising their art under the guidance and criticism of an experienced

teacher. This practice-teaching is done in a Model School, maintained

for this purpose in connection with the main school. Such is the theory.

But serious difficulties are encountered in carrying the plan into

practical effect, and these difficulties are so great as in some

instances to have led to the entire abandonment of the plan, while very

rarely have the conductors of Normal schools been able to realize

results in this matter commensurate with their wishes or with their

views of what was desirable and right.

Some of the difficulties are the following: Parents who send their

children to the Model School object to have their children taught to any

considerable extent by mere pupil-teachers. The teachers of the Model

School, having little or no acquaintance with the Normal pupils sent to

teach under their supervision, do not feel that entire freedom in

criticising the performance which is essential to its success. The

irregularities produced by these practice-teachings have a tendency to

impair the discipline of the classes in the Model School.

For these and other reasons which I need not dwell upon, I at least have

always been obliged to be somewhat chary in regard to the amount of

practice-teaching that was done in the institution under my care, and

have never felt quite satisfied as to the result. At the beginning of

the year 1867, I determined to try the plan of having a considerable

portion of the practice-teaching done in the Normal School itself, the

Model School still holding its place in the system as furnishing an

unrivalled opportunity for observation, and to some extent of practice

also. The effect of thus extending the opportunity for practice by

including the Normal School in its operations has been most happy. The

pupils have attained a degree of freedom in the exercise which is

working the most marked and decisive results. They enter into it with

more zest than into any other exercise of the class, and derive from it

in some instances as much benefit as from all their other exercises put

together.

Some detailed account of the method may perhaps be of interest to other

laborers in the same field. The method is substantially the same as that

followed in the Girls High and Normal School of Philadelphia, from which

indeed I borrowed the idea.

Once a week I make up a programme containing the names of those who are

to teach during the following week, and the classes and lessons which

they are severally to teach. The practice-pupils are thus enabled to

prepare themselves fully for the exercise. It is an indispensable

condition in all these exercises that the lesson be given without the

use of the book. When a pupil enters a room to teach one of these

assigned lessons, he is to bring with him only his crayon and pointer,

and is expected to assume entire charge of the class, maintaining order,

hearing the pupils recite, correcting their mistakes, illustrating the

subject, if necessary, by diagrams or experiments, giving supplementary

information drawn from other sources than the text-book, and acting in

all respects as if he were the regular teacher. The regular teacher

meanwhile sits by, observing in silence, and at the close of the day

writes out a full and detailed criticism upon the performance in a book

kept for this purpose, and gives the pupil an average for it, the

maximum being 100. These criticisms, together with the teaching

averages, are read next day by the Principal to the pupil in the

presence of the class to which he belongs, with additional comments in

regard to any principles of teaching that may be involved in the

criticisms.

An essential element of success in this scheme, is that the teachers

should be thoroughly faithful in the work of criticism, and point out

the errors and shortcomings of the young practitioners, not with

harshness, but with unsparing truthfulness and wise discrimination.

Practice-teaching under such conditions cannot fail to have a powerful

effect. The pupils are stimulated by it to put forth the very best

efforts of which they are capable, and the talent which they often

develop is a surprise equally to themselves and their teachers.

I cannot better give an idea of this practice-teaching, and especially

of the criticism which is its vitalizing principle, than by quoting a

few of the actual criticisms made during the last year. I feel sure they

will interest teachers and perhaps the public.

In making these extracts, I suppress, of course, the names of the

parties.

In the School-Room: Chapters in the Philosophy of Education · 第 59 / 94 题