THREE -- The Duel of Dr Hirsch

M. MAURICE BRUN and M. Armand Armagnac were crossing the sunlit Champs

Elysee with a kind of vivacious respectability. They were both short,

brisk and bold. They both had black beards that did not seem to belong

to their faces, after the strange French fashion which makes real hair

look like artificial. M. Brun had a dark wedge of beard apparently

affixed under his lower lip. M. Armagnac, by way of a change, had two

beards; one sticking out from each corner of his emphatic chin. They

were both young. They were both atheists, with a depressing fixity of

outlook but great mobility of exposition. They were both pupils of the

great Dr Hirsch, scientist, publicist and moralist.

M. Brun had become prominent by his proposal that the common expression

“Adieu” should be obliterated from all the French classics, and a slight

fine imposed for its use in private life. “Then,” he said, “the very

name of your imagined God will have echoed for the last time in the ear

of man.” M. Armagnac specialized rather in a resistance to militarism,

and wished the chorus of the Marseillaise altered from “Aux armes,

citoyens” to “Aux greves, citoyens”. But his antimilitarism was of a

peculiar and Gallic sort. An eminent and very wealthy English Quaker,

who had come to see him to arrange for the disarmament of the whole

planet, was rather distressed by Armagnac’s proposal that (by way of

beginning) the soldiers should shoot their officers.

And indeed it was in this regard that the two men differed most from

their leader and father in philosophy. Dr Hirsch, though born in France

and covered with the most triumphant favours of French education, was

temperamentally of another type--mild, dreamy, humane; and, despite his

sceptical system, not devoid of transcendentalism. He was, in short,

more like a German than a Frenchman; and much as they admired him,

something in the subconsciousness of these Gauls was irritated at his

pleading for peace in so peaceful a manner. To their party throughout

Europe, however, Paul Hirsch was a saint of science. His large and

daring cosmic theories advertised his austere life and innocent, if

somewhat frigid, morality; he held something of the position of Darwin

doubled with the position of Tolstoy. But he was neither an anarchist

nor an antipatriot; his views on disarmament were moderate and

evolutionary--the Republican Government put considerable confidence in

him as to various chemical improvements. He had lately even discovered

a noiseless explosive, the secret of which the Government was carefully

guarding.

His house stood in a handsome street near the Elysee--a street which in

that strong summer seemed almost as full of foliage as the park itself;

a row of chestnuts shattered the sunshine, interrupted only in one place

where a large cafe ran out into the street. Almost opposite to this

were the white and green blinds of the great scientist’s house, an iron

balcony, also painted green, running along in front of the first-floor

windows. Beneath this was the entrance into a kind of court, gay with

shrubs and tiles, into which the two Frenchmen passed in animated talk.

The door was opened to them by the doctor’s old servant, Simon, who

might very well have passed for a doctor himself, having a strict suit

of black, spectacles, grey hair, and a confidential manner. In fact, he

was a far more presentable man of science than his master, Dr Hirsch,

who was a forked radish of a fellow, with just enough bulb of a head to

make his body insignificant. With all the gravity of a great physician

handling a prescription, Simon handed a letter to M. Armagnac. That

gentleman ripped it up with a racial impatience, and rapidly read the

following:

I cannot come down to speak to you. There is a man in this house whom I

refuse to meet. He is a Chauvinist officer, Dubosc. He is sitting on the

stairs. He has been kicking the furniture about in all the other rooms;

I have locked myself in my study, opposite that cafe. If you love me,

go over to the cafe and wait at one of the tables outside. I will try

to send him over to you. I want you to answer him and deal with him. I

cannot meet him myself. I cannot: I will not.

There is going to be another Dreyfus case.

The wisdom of Father Brown · 第 8 / 19 题