it is grim and gaunt, and consists merely of a nave in the severe
Romanesque-Transition manner, surmounted by a later and non-contemporary
tower and spire.
In spite of this it looms large from every view-point in the town, and
is so lively a component of the busy life which surrounds it that it
is--in spite of its severity of outline--a very appealing church edifice
in more senses than one.
[Illustration: CATHÉDRALE _de TULLE...._]
Its tall, finely-proportioned tower and spire, which indeed is the chief
attribute of grace and symmetry, is of the fourteenth century, and,
though plain and primitive in its outlines, is far more pleasing than
the crocketed and rococo details which in a later day were composed into
something which was thought to be a spire.
In the earliest days of its history, this rather bare and cold church
was a Benedictine monastery whose primitive church dated as far back as
the seventh century. There are yet remains of a cloister which may have
belonged to the early church of this monastic house, and as such is
highly interesting, and withal pleasing.
The bishopric was founded in 1317 by Arnaud de St. Astier. The
Revolution caused much devastation here in the precincts of this
cathedral, which was first stripped of its _trésor_, and finally of its
dignity, when the see was abolished.
XI
ST. PIERRE D'ANGOULÊME
Angoulême is often first called to mind by its famous or notorious
Duchesse, whose fame is locally perpetuated by a not very suitable
column, erected in the Promenade Beaulieu in 1815. There is certainly a
wealth of romance to be conjured up from the recollection of the famous
Counts of Angoulême and their adherents, who made their residence in the
ancient château which to-day forms in part the Hôtel de Ville, and in
part the prison. Here in this château was born Marguerite de Valois, the
Marguerite of Marguerites, as François I. called her; here took welcome
shelter, Marie de Medici after her husband's assassination; and here,
too, much more of which history tells.
[Illustration: ST. PIERRE ... _a' ANGOULÊME_]
What most histories do not tell is that the cathedral of St. Pierre
d'Angoulême, with the cathedral of St. Front at Périgueux and Notre Dame
de Poitiers, ranks at the very head of that magnificent architectural
style known as Aquitanian.
St. Ansone was the first bishop of the diocese--in the third century.
The see was then, as now, a suffragan of Bordeaux. Religious wars, here
as throughout Aquitaine, were responsible for a great unrest among the
people, as well as the sacrilege and desecration of church property.
The most marked spoliation was at the hands of the Protestant Coligny,
the effects of whose sixteenth-century ravages are yet visible in the
cathedral.
A monk--Michel Grillet--was hung to a mulberry-tree,--which stood where
now is the Place du Murier (mulberry),--by Coligny, who was reviled thus
in the angry dying words of the monk: "You shall be thrown out of the
window like Jezebel, and shall be ignominiously dragged through the
streets." This prophecy did not come true, but Coligny died an
inglorious death in 1572, at the instigation of the Duc de Guise.
This cathedral ranks as one of the most curious in France, and, with its
alien plan and details, has ever been the object of the profound
admiration of all who have studied its varied aspects.
Mainly it is a twelfth-century edifice throughout, in spite of the
extensive restorations of the nineteenth century, which have eradicated
many crudities that might better have been allowed to remain. It is
ranked by the Ministère des Beaux Arts as a _Monument Historique_.
The west front, in spite of the depredations before, during, and after
the Revolution, is notable for its rising tiers of round-headed arches
seated firmly on proportionate though not gross columns, its statued
niches, the rich bas-reliefs of the tympanum of its portal, the
exquisite arabesques, of lintel, frieze, and archivolt, and, above all,
its large central arch with _Vesica piscis_, and the added decorations
of emblems of the evangels and angels. In addition to all this, which
forms a gallery of artistic details in itself, the general disposition
of parts is luxurious and remarkable.
As a whole, St. Pierre is commonly credited as possessing the finest
Lombard detail to be found in the north; some say outside of Italy.
Certainly it is prodigious in its splendour, whatever may be one's
predilections for or against the expression of its art.
The church follows in general plan the same distinctive style. Its
tower, too, is Lombard, likewise the rounded apside, and--though the
church is of the elongated Latin or cruciform ground-plan--its
possession of a great central dome (with three others above the
nave--and withal aisleless) points certainly to the great domed churches
of the Lombard plain for its ancestry.
The western dome is of the eleventh century, the others of the twelfth.
Its primitiveness has been more or less distorted by later additions,
made necessary by devastation in the sixteenth century, but it ranks
to-day, with St. Front at Périgueux, as the leading example of the style
known as Aquitanian.
Above the western portal is a great window, very tall and showing in its
glass a "Last Judgment."
A superb tower ends off the _croisillon_ on the north and rises to the
height of one hundred and ninety-seven feet. "Next to the west front and
the domed roofing of the interior, this tower ranks as the third most
curious and remarkable feature of this unusual church." This tower, in
spite of its appealing properties, is curiously enough not the original
to which the previous descriptive lines applied; but their echo may be
heard to-day with respect to the present tower, which is a
reconstruction, of the same materials, and after the same manner, so far
as possible, as the original.
As the most notable and peculiar details of the interior, will be
remarked the cupolas of the roof, and the lantern at the crossing, which
is pierced by twelve windows.
For sheer beauty, and its utile purpose as well, this great _lanthorn_
is further noted as being most unusual in either the Romanesque or
Gothic churches of France.
The choir is apse-ended and is surrounded by four chapels of no great
prominence or beauty.
The south transept has a _tour_ in embryo, which, had it been completed,
would doubtless have been the twin of that which terminates the transept
on the north.
The foundations of the episcopal residence, which is immediately beside
the cathedral (restored in the nineteenth century), are very ancient. In
its garden stands a colossal statue to Comte Jean, the father of
François I.
Angoulême was the residence of the Black Prince after the battle of
Poitiers, though no record remains as to where he may have lodged. A
house in the Rue de Genève has been singled out in the past as being
where John Calvin lived in 1533, but it is not recognizable to-day.
XII
NOTRE DAME DE MOULINS
"_Les Bourbonnais sont aimables, mais vains, légers et facilement
oublieux, avec rien d'excessif, rien d'exubérance dans leur
nature._"
--ANDRÉ ROLLAND.
Until he had travelled through Bourbonnais, "the sweetest part of
France--in the hey-day of the vintage," said Sterne, "I never felt the
distress of plenty."
This is an appropriate enough observation to have been promulgated by a
latter-day traveller. Here the abundance which apparently pours forth
for every one's benefit knows no diminution one season from another. One
should not allow his pen to ramble to too great an extent in this vein,
or he will soon say with Sterne: "Just Heaven! it will fill up twenty
volumes,--and alas, there are but a few small pages!"
[Illustration: NOTRE DAME _de MOULINS_]
It suffices, then, to reiterate, that in this plenteous land of
mid-France there is, for all classes of man and beast, an abundance and
excellence of the harvest of the soil which makes for a fondness to
linger long within the confines of this region. Thus did the far-seeing
Bourbons, who, throughout the country which yet is called of them, set
up many magnificent establishments and ensconced themselves and their
retainers among the comforts of this world to a far greater degree than
many other ruling houses of mediæval times. Perhaps none of the great
names, among the long lists of lords, dukes, and kings, whose lands
afterward came to make the solidarity of the all-embracing monarchy,
could be accused of curtailing the wealth of power and goods which
conquest or bloodshed could secure or save for them.
The power of the Bourbons endured, like the English Tudors, but a
century and a half beyond the period of its supremacy; whence, from its
maturity onward, it rotted and was outrooted bodily.
The literature of Moulins, for the English reading and speaking world,
appears to be an inconsiderable quantity. Certain romances have been
woven about the ducal château, and yet others concerning the
all-powerful Montmorencies, besides much history, which partakes
generously of the components of literary expression.
In the country round about--if the traveller has come by road, or for
that matter by "_train omnibus_"--if he will but keep his eyes open, he
will have no difficulty in recognizing this picture: "A little
farmhouse, surrounded with about twenty acres of vineyard, and about as
much corn--and close to the house, on one side, a _potagerie_ of an acre
and a half, full of everything which could make plenty in a French
peasant's house--and on the other side a little wood, which furnished
wherewithal to dress it."
To continue, could one but see into that house, the picture would in no
small degree differ from this: "A family consisting of an old,
gray-headed man and his wife, with five or six sons and sons-in-law, and
their several wives, and a joyous genealogy out of them ... all sitting
down together to their lentil soup; a large wheaten loaf in the middle
of the table; and a flagon of wine at each end of it, and promised joy
throughout the various stages of the repast."
Where in any other than this land of plenty, for the peasant and
prosperous alike, could such a picture be drawn of the plenitude which
surrounds the home life of a son of the soil and his nearest kin? Such
an equipment of comfort and joy not only makes for a continuous and
placid contentment, but for character and ambition; in spite of all that
harum-scarum Jeremiahs may proclaim out of their little knowledge and
less sympathy with other affairs than their own. No individualism is
proclaimed, but it is intimated, and the reader may apply the
observation wherever he may think it belongs.
Moulins is the capital of the Bourbonnais--the name given to the
province and the people alike. The derivation of the word Bourbon is
more legendary than historical, if one is to give any weight to the
discovery of a tablet at _Bourbonne-les-Bains,_ in 1830, which bore the
following dedication:
DEO, APOL
LINI BORVONI
ET DAMONAE
C DAMINIUS
FEROX CIVIS
LINGONUS EX
VOTO
Its later application to the land which sheltered the race is elucidated
by a French writer, thus:
"Considering that the names of all the cities and towns known as _des
sources d'eaux thermales_ commence with either the prefix _Bour_ or
_Bor_, indicates a common origin of the word ... from the name of the
divinity which protects the waters."
This is so plausible and picturesque a conjecture that it would seem to
be true.
Archæologists have singled out from among the most beautiful _chapelles
seigneuriales_ the one formerly contained in the ducal palace of the
Bourbons at Moulins. This formed, of course, a part of that gaunt,
time-worn fabric which faces the westerly end of the cathedral.
Little there is to-day to suggest this splendour, and for such one has
to look to those examples yet to be seen at Chambord or Chenonceaux, or
that of the Maison de Jacques Coeur at Bourges, with which, in its
former state, this private chapel of the Bourbons was a contemporary.
The other chief attraction of Moulins is the theatrical Mausolée de
Henri de Montmorency, a seventeenth-century work which is certainly
gorgeous and splendid in its magnificence, if not in its æsthetic value
as an art treasure.
The fresh, modern-looking cathedral of Notre Dame de Moulins is a more
ancient work than it really looks, though in its completed form it dates
only from the late nineteenth century, when the indefatigable
Viollet-le-Duc erected the fine twin towers and completed the western
front.
The whole effect of this fresh-looking edifice is of a certain elegance,
though in reality of no great luxuriousness.
The portal is deep but unornamented, and the rose window above is of
generous design, though not actually so great in size as at first
appears. Taken _tout ensemble_ this west front--of modern design and
workmanship--is far more expressive of the excellent and true
proportions of the mediæval workers than is usually the case.
The spires are lofty (312 feet) and are decidedly the most beautiful
feature of the entire design.
The choir, the more ancient portion (1465-1507), expands into a more
ample width than the nave and has a curiously squared-off termination
which would hardly be described as an apside, though the effect is
circular when viewed from within. The choir, too, rises to a greater
height than the nave, and, though there is no very great discrepancy in
style between the easterly and westerly ends, the line of demarcation is
readily placed. The square flanking chapels of the choir serve to give
an ampleness to the ambulatory which is unusual, and in the exterior
present again a most interesting arrangement and effect.
The cathedral gives on the west on the Place du Château, with the bare,
broken wall of the ducal château immediately _en face_, and the
Gendarmerie, which occupies a most interestingly picturesque Renaissance
building, is immediately to the right.
The interior arrangements of this brilliant cathedral church are quite
as pleasing and true as the exterior. There is no poverty in design or
decoration, and no overdeveloped luxuriance, except for the accidence of
the Renaissance tendencies of its time.
There is no flagrant offence committed, however, and the ambulatory of
the choir and its queer overhanging gallery at the rear of the altar are
the only unusual features from the conventional decorated Gothic plan;
if we except the _baldachino_ which covers the altar-table, and which
is actually hideous in its enormity.
The bishop's throne, curiously enough,--though the custom is, it
appears, very, very old,--is placed _behind_ the high-altar.
The triforium and clerestory of the choir have gracefully heightened
arches supported by graceful pillars, which give an effect of exceeding
lightness.
In the nave the triforium is omitted, and the clerestory only overtops
the pillars of nave and aisles.
The transepts are not of great proportions, but are not in any way
attenuated.
Under the high-altar is a "Holy Sepulchre" of the sixteenth century,
which is penetrated by an opening which gives on the ambulatory of the
choir.
There is a bountiful display of coloured glass of the Renaissance
period, and, in the sacristy, a _triptych_ attributed to Ghirlandajo.
There are no other artistic accessories of note, and the cathedral
depends, in the main, for its satisfying qualities in its general
completeness and consistency.
XIII
NOTRE DAME DE LE PUY
"Under the sun of the _Midi_ I have seen the Pyrenees and the Alps,
crowned in rose and silver, but I best love Auvergne and its bed of
gorse."
--PIERRE DE NOLHAC.
Le Puy has been called--by a discerning traveller--and rightly enough,
too, in the opinion of most persons--"_the most picturesque spot in the
world_." Whether every visitor thereto will endorse this unqualifiedly
depends somewhat on his view-point, and still more on his ability to
discriminate.
Le Puy certainly possesses an unparalleled array of what may as well be
called rare attractions. These are primarily the topographical,
architectural, and, first, last, and all times, picturesque elements
which only a blind man could fail to diagnose as something unique and
not to be seen elsewhere.
[Illustration: NOTRE DAME _de LE PUY_.]
In the first category are the extraordinary pinnacles of volcanic
rock with which the whole surrounding landscape is peopled; in the
second, the city's grand architectural monuments, cathedrals, churches,
monastery and the château of Polignac; while thirdly, the whole aspect
is irritatingly picturesque to the lover of topographical charm and
feature. Here the situation of the city itself, in a basin of
surrounding peaks, its sky-piercing, turreted rocks, and the general
effect produced by its architectural features all combine to present
emotions which a large catalogue were necessary to define.
Moreover, Le Puy is the gateway to a hitherto almost unknown region to
the English-speaking tourist. At least it would have been unknown but
for the eulogy given it by the wandering Robert Louis Stevenson, who, in
his "Travels with a Donkey," (not "On a Donkey,"--mark the distinction),
has made the Cevennes known, at least as a nodding acquaintance,
to--well, a great many who would never have consciously realized that
there was such a place.
Le Puy is furthermore as yet unspoiled by the "conducted tourist," and
lives the same life that it has for many generations. Electric trams
have come to be sure, and certain improvements in the way of boulevards
and squares have been laid out, but, in the main, the narrow, tortuous
streets which ascend to its cathedral-crowned height are much as they
always were; and the native pays little heed to the visitor, of which
class not many ever come to the city--perhaps for the reason that Le Puy
is not so very accessible by rail. Both by the line which descends the
Rhône valley and its parallel line from Paris to Nîmes, one has to
branch off, and is bound to lose from three to six hours--or more, at
some point or other, making connections. This is as it should be--in
spite of the apparent retrogression.
When one really does get to Le Puy nothing should satisfy him but to
follow the trail of Stevenson's donkey into the heart of the Cevennes,
that wonderful country which lies to the southward, and see and know for
himself some of the things which that delectable author set forth in the
record of his travels.
Monastier, Le Cheylard, La Bastide, Notre Dame des Neiges, Mont Mézenac,
and many more delightful places are, so far as personal knowledge goes,
a sealed book to most folk; and after one has visited them for himself,
he may rest assured they will still remain a sealed book to the mass.
The ecclesiastical treasures of Le Puy are first and foremost centred
around its wonderful, though bizarre, Romanesque cathedral of Notre
Dame.
Some have said that this cathedral church dates from the fifth century.
Possibly this is so, but assuredly there is no authority which makes a
statement which is at all convincing concerning any work earlier than
the tenth century.
Le Puy's first bishop was St. Georges,--in the third century,--at which
time, as now, the diocese was a suffragan of Bourges.
The cathedral itself is perched on a hilltop behind which rises an
astonishing crag or pinnacle,--the _rocher Corneille_, which, in turn,
is surmounted by a modern colossal bronze figure, commonly called _Notre
Dame de France_. The native will tell you that it is called "the Virgin
of Le Puy." Due allowance for local pride doubtless accounts for this.
Its height is fifty feet, and while astonishingly impressive in many
ways, is, as a work of art, without beauty in itself.
[Illustration: _Le Puy_]
There is a sort of subterranean or crypt-like structure, beneath the
westerly end of the cathedral, caused by the extreme slope of the rock
upon which the choir end is placed. One enters by a stairway of sixty
steps, which is beneath the parti-coloured façade of the twelfth
century. It is very striking and must be a unique approach to a
cathedral; the entrance here being two stories below that of the
pavement of nave and choir. This porch of three round-arched naves is
wholly unusual. Entrance to the main body of the church is finally
gained through the transept.
The whole structure is curiously kaleidoscopic, with blackish and dark
brown tints predominating, but alternating--in the west façade, which
has been restored in recent times--with bands of a lighter and again a
darker stone. It has been called by a certain red-robed mentor of
travel-lore an ungainly, venerable, but singular edifice: quite a
non-committal estimate, and one which, like most of its fellows, is
worse than a slander. It is most usually conceded by French
authorities--_who might naturally be supposed to know their
subject_--that it is very nearly the most genuinely interesting
exposition of a local manner of church-building extant; and as such the
cathedral at Le Puy merits great consideration.
The choir is the oldest portion, and is probably not of later date than
the tenth century. The glass therein is modern. It has a possession, a
"miraculous virgin,"--whose predecessor was destroyed in the fury of the
Revolution,--which is supposed to work wonders upon those who bestow an
appropriate votive offering. To the former shrine came many pilgrims,
numbering among them, it is said rather indefinitely and doubtfully,
"several popes and the following kings: Louis VII., Philippe-Auguste,
Philippe-le-Hardi, Charles VI., Charles VII., Louis XI., and Charles
VIII."
To-day, as if doubtful of the shrine's efficacy, the pilgrims are few in
number and mostly of the peasant class.
The bays of the nave are divided by round-headed arches, but connected
with the opposing bay by the ogival variety.
The transepts have apsidal terminations, as is much more frequent south
of the Loire than in the north of France, but still of sufficient
novelty to be remarked here. The east end is rectangular--which is
really a very unusual attribute in any part of France, only two examples
elsewhere standing out prominently--the cathedrals at Laon and
Dol-de-Bretagne. The cloister of Notre Dame, small and simple though it
be, is of a singular charm and tranquillity.
With the tower or cupola of this cathedral the architects of Auvergne
achieved a result very near the _perfectionnement_ of its style. Like
all of the old-time _clochers_ erected in this province--anterior to
Gothic--it presents a great analogy to Byzantine origin, though, in a
way, not quite like it either. Still the effect of columns and pillars,
in both the interior construction and exterior decoration of these fine
towers, forms something which suggests, at least, a development of an
ideal which bears little, or no, relation to the many varieties of
_campanile_, _beffroi_, _tour_ or _clocher_ seen elsewhere in France.
The spire, as we know it elsewhere, a dominant pyramidal termination,
the love of which Mistral has said is the foundation of patriotism, is
in this region almost entirely wanting; showing that the influence, from
whatever it may have sprung, was no copy of anything which had gone
before, nor even the suggestion of a tendency or influence toward the
pointed Gothic, or northern style. Therefore the towers, like most other
features of this style, are distinctly of the land of its
environment--Auvergnian.
This will call to mind, to the American, the fact that Trinity Church in
Boston is manifestly the most distinctive application, in foreign lands,
of the form and features of the manner of church-building of the
Auvergne.
Particularly is this to be noted by viewing the choir exterior with its
inlaid or geometrically planned stonework: a feature which is Romanesque
if we go back far enough, but which is distinctly Auvergnian in its
mediæval use.
For sheer novelty, before even the towering bronze statue of the Virgin,
which overtops the cathedral, must be placed that other needle-like
basaltic eminence which is crowned by a tiny chapel dedicated to St.
Michel.
This "_aiguille_," as it is locally known, rises something over two
hundred and fifty feet from the river-bed at its base; like a sharp
cone, dwindling from a diameter of perhaps five hundred feet at its base
to a scant fifty at its apex.
St. Michel has always had a sort of vested proprietorship in such
pinnacles as this, and this tiny chapel in his honour was the erection
of a prelate of the diocese of Le Puy in the tenth century. The chapel
is Romanesque, octagonal, and most curious; with its isolated
situation,--only reached by a flight of many steps cut in the rock,--and
its tesselated stone pavements, its mosaic in basalt of the portal, and
its few curious sculptures in stone. As a place of pilgrimage for a
twentieth-century tourist it is much more appealing than the
Virgin-crowned _rocher Corneille_; each will anticipate no
inconsiderable amount of physical labour, which, however, is the true
pilgrim spirit.
The château of Polignac _compels_ attention, and it is not so very
foreign to church affairs after all; the house of the name gave to the
court of Louis XIV. a cardinal.
To-day this one-time feudal stronghold is but a mere ruin. The
Revolution finished it, as did that fury many another architectural
glory of France.
[Illustration: _The Black Virgin, Le Puy_]
XIV
NOTRE DAME DE CLERMONT-FERRAND
Clermont-Ferrand is the hub from which radiates in the season,--from
April to October,--and in all directions, the genuine French _touriste_.
He is a remarkable species of traveller, and he apportions to himself
the best places in the _char-à bancs_ and the most convenient seats at
_table d'hôte_ with a discrimination that is perfection. He is not much
interested in cathedrals, or indeed in the twin city of Clermont-Ferrand
itself, but rather his choice lies in favour of Mont Doré, Puy de Dôme,
Royat, St. Nectaire, or a dozen other alluring tourist resorts in which
the neighbouring volcanic region abounds.
By reason of this--except for its hotels and cafés--Clermont-Ferrand is
justly entitled to rank as one of the most ancient and important centres
of Christianity in France.
[Illustration: NOTRE DAME _de CLERMONT-FERRAND_]
Its cathedral is not of the local manner of building: it is of manifest
Norman example. But the Église Notre Dame du Port is Auvergnian of
the most profound type, and withal, perhaps more appealing than the
cathedral itself. Furthermore the impulse of the famous crusades first
took form here under the fervent appeal of Urban II., who was in the
city at the Council of the Church held in 1095. Altogether the part
played by this city of mid-France in the affairs of the Christian faith
was not only great, but most important and far-reaching in its effect.
In its cathedral are found to a very considerable extent those
essentials to the realization of the pure Gothic style, which even Sir
Christopher Wren confessed his inability to fully comprehend.
It is a pleasant relief, and a likewise pleasant reminder of the
somewhat elaborate glories of the Isle of France, to come upon an
edifice which at least presents a semblance to the symmetrical pointed
Gothic of the north. The more so in that it is surrounded by Romanesque
and local types which are peers among their class.
Truly enough it is that such churches as Notre Dame du Port, the
cathedral at Le Puy, and the splendid series of Romanesque churches at
Poitiers are as interesting and as worthy of study as the resplendent
modern Gothic. On the other hand, the transition to the baseness of the
Renaissance,--without the intervention of the pointed style,--while not
so marked here as elsewhere, is yet even more painfully impressed upon
one.
The contrast between the Romanesque style, which was manifestly a good
style, and the Renaissance, which was palpably bad, suggests, as
forcibly as any event of history, the change of temperament which came
upon the people, from the fifteenth to the seventeenth centuries.
This cathedral is possessed of two fine western towers (340 feet in
height), graceful in every proportion, hardy without being clumsy,
symmetrical without weakness, and dwindling into crowning spires after a
manner which approaches similar works at Bordeaux and Quimper. These
examples are not of first rank, but, if not of masterful design, are at
least acceptable exponents of the form they represent.
These towers, as well as the western portal, are, however, of a very
late date. They are the work of Viollet-le-Duc in the latter half of the
nineteenth century, and indicate--if nothing more--that, where a good
model is used, a modern Gothic work may still betray the spirit of
antiquity. This gifted architect was not so successful with the western
towers of the abbey church of St. Ouen at Rouen. Externally the
cathedral at Clermont-Ferrand shows a certain lack of uniformity.
Its main fabric, of a black volcanic stone, dates from 1248 to 1265. At
this time the work was in charge of one Jean Deschamps.
The church was not, however, consecrated until nearly a century later,
and until the completion of the west front remained always an unfinished
work which received but scant consideration from lovers of church
architecture.
The whole structure was sorely treated at the Revolution, was entirely
stripped of its ornaments and what monuments it possessed, and was only
saved from total destruction by a subterfuge advanced by a local
magistrate, who suggested that the edifice might be put to other than
its original use.
The first two bays of the nave are also of nineteenth-century
construction. This must account for the frequent references of a former
day to the general effect of incompleteness. To-day it is a coherent if
not a perfect whole, though works of considerable magnitude are still
under way.
The general effect of the interior is harmonious, though gloomy as to
its lighting, and bare as to its walls.
The vault rises something over a hundred feet above the pavement, and
the choir platform is considerably elevated. The aisles of the nave are
doubled, and very wide.
The joints of pier and wall have been newly "pointed," giving an
impression of a more modern work than the edifice really is.
The glass of the nave and choir is of a rare quality and unusually
abundant. How it escaped the fury of the Revolution is a mystery.
There are two fifteenth-century rose windows in the transepts, and a
more modern example in the west front, the latter being decidedly
inferior to the others. The glass of the choir is the most beautiful of
all, and is of the time of Louis IX., whose arms, quartered with those
of Spain, are shown therein. The general effect of this coloured glass
is not of the supreme excellence of that at Chartres, but the effect of
mellowness, on first entering, is in every way more impressive than that
of any other cathedral south of the Loire.
The organ _buffet_ has, in this instance, been cut away to allow of the
display of the modern _rosace_. This is a most thoughtful consideration
of the attributes of a grand window; which is obviously that of giving a
pleasing effect to an interior, rather than its inclusion in the
exterior scheme of decoration.
In the choir is a _retable_ of gilded and painted wood, representing the
life of St. Crépinien, a few tombs, and in the chapels some frescoes of
the thirteenth century. There is the much-appreciated astronomical
clock--a curiosity of doubtful artistic work and symbolism--in one of
the transepts.
A statue of Pope Urban II. is _en face_ to the right of the cathedral.
At the Council of 1095 Urban II. preached for the first crusade to
avenge the slaughter "of pilgrims, princes, and bishops," which had
taken place at Romola in Palestine, and to regain possession of
Jerusalem and the Holy Sepulchre from the Turkish Sultan, Ortock.
The enthusiasm of the pontiff was so great that the masses forthwith
entered fully into the spirit of the act, the nobles tearing their red
robes into shreds to form the badge of the crusader's cross, which was
given to all who took the vow.
By command of the Pope, every serf who took the cross was to obtain his
liberty from his overlord. This fact, perhaps, more than any other led
to the swelled ranks of the first crusade under Peter the Hermit.
The rest is history, though really much of its written chronicle is
really romance.
Clermont was a bishopric in the third century, with St. Austremoine as
its first bishop. The diocese is to-day a suffragan of Bourges.
At the head of the Cours Sablon is a fifteenth-century fountain,
executed to the order of a former bishop, Jacques d'Amboise.
The bibliothèque still preserves, among fifty thousand volumes and
eleven hundred MSS., an illuminated folio Bible of the twelfth century,
a missal which formerly belonged to Pope Clement VI., and a
ninth-century manuscript of the monk, Gregory of Tours.
Near the cathedral in the Rue de Petit Gras is the birthplace of the
precocious Blaise Pascal, who next to Urban II.--if not even before
him--is perhaps Clermont's most famous personage. A bust of the
celebrated writer is let into the wall which faces the Passage Vernines,
and yet another adorns the entrance to the bibliothèque; and again
another--a full-length figure this time--is set about with growing
plants, in the Square Blaise Pascal. Altogether one will judge that
Pascal is indeed the most notable figure in the secular history of the
city. This most original intellect of his time died in 1662, at the
early age of thirty-nine.
XV
ST. FULCRAN DE LODÈVE
Lodève, seated tightly among the mountains, near the confluence of the
rivers Solondre and Lergue, not far from the Cevennes and the borders of
the Gévaudan, was a bishopric, suffragan of Narbonne, as early as the
beginning of the fourth century.
It had been the capital of the Gallic tribe of the Volsques, then a
pagan Roman city, and finally was converted to Christianity in the year
323 by the apostle St. Flour, who founded the bishopric, which, with so
many others, was suppressed at the Revolution.
The city suffered greatly from the wars of the Goths, the Albigenses,
and later the civil wars of the Protestants and Catholics. The bishops
of Lodève were lords by virtue of the fact that the title was bought
from the viscounts whose honour it had previously held. _St. Guillem Ley
Desert_ (O. F.), a famous abbey of the Benedictines, founded by an
ancestor of the Prince of Orange, is near by.
The ancient cathedral of St. Fulcran is situated in the _haute-ville_
and dates, as to its foundation walls, from the middle of the tenth
century. The reconstructed present-day edifice is mainly of the
thirteenth century, and as an extensive work of its time is entitled to
rank with many of the cathedral churches which survived the Revolution.
By the end of the sixteenth century, the last remaining work and
alterations were completed, and one sees therefore a fairly consistent
mediæval church. The west façade is surmounted by _tourelles_ which are
capped with a defending _mâchicoulis_, presumably for defence from
attack from the west, as this battlement could hardly have been intended
for mere ornament, decorative though it really is. The interior height
rises to something approximating eighty feet, and is imposing to a far
greater degree than many more magnificent and wealthy churches.
The choir is truly elegant in its proportions and decorations, its chief
ornament being that of the high-altar, and the white marble lions which
flank the stalls. From the choir one enters the ruined cloister of the
fifteenth century; which, if not remarkable in any way, is at least
distinctive and a sufficiently uncommon appendage of a cathedral church
to be remarked.
A marble tomb of a former bishop,--Plantavit de la Pause,--a
distinguished prelate and bibliophile, is also in the choir. This
monument is a most worthy artistic effort, and shows two lions lying at
the foot of a full-length figure of the churchman. It dates from 1651,
and, though of Renaissance workmanship, its design and sculpture--like
most monumental work of its era--are far ahead of the quality of
craftsmanship displayed by the builders and architects of the same
period.
The one-time episcopal residence is now occupied by the _hôtel de
ville_, the _tribunal_, and the _caserne de gendarmerie_. As a shelter
for civic dignity this is perhaps not a descent from its former glory,
but as a _caserne_ it is a shameful debasement; not, however, as mean as
the level to which the papal palace at Avignon has fallen.
The guide-book information--which, be it said, is not disputed or
reviled here--states that the city's manufactories supply _surtout des
draps_ for the army; but the church-lover will get little sustenance for
his refined appetite from this kernel of matter-of-fact information.
Lodève is, however, a charming provincial town, with two ancient bridges
crossing its rivers, a ruined château, _Montbrun_, and a fine promenade
which overlooks the river valleys round about.
_PART III
The Rhône Valley_
I
INTRODUCTORY
The knowledge of the geographer Ptolemy, who wrote in the second century
with regard to the Rhône, was not so greatly at fault as with respect to
other topographical features, such as coasts and boundaries.
Perhaps the fact that Gaul had for so long been under Roman dominion had
somewhat to do with this.
He gives, therefore, a tolerably correct account as to this mighty
river, placing its sources in the Alps, and tracing its flow through the
lake _Lemannus_ (Leman) to _Lugdunum_ (Lyon); whence, turning sharply to
the southward, it enters the Mediterranean south of Arles. Likewise, he
correctly adds that the upper river is joined with the combined flow of
the Doubs and Saône, but commits the error of describing their source to
be also in the Alps.
Philip Gilbert Hamerton, who knew these parts well,--his home was near
Autun,--has described the confluence of the Saône and Rhône thus:
"The width and depth of the two rivers are equal, but the swift-flowing
Rhône discharges twice the volume of water of the slow-running Saône.
They also differ remarkably in colour. The Saône is emerald-green and
the Rhône blue-green. Here the minor river loses its name and character,
and, by an unusual process, the slowest and most navigable stream in
Europe joins the swiftest and least navigable. The _Flumen Araris_
ceases and becomes the _Rhodanus_."
The volume of water which yearly courses down the Rhône is perhaps
greater than would first appear, when, at certain seasons of the year,
one sees a somewhat thin film of water gliding over a wide expanse of
yellow sand and shingle.
Throughout, however, it is of generous width and at times rises in a
true torrential manner: this when the spring freshets and melting Alpine
snows are directed thither toward their natural outlet to the sea.
"Rivers," said Blaise Pascal, "are the roads that move." Along the great
river valleys of the Rhône, the Loire, the Seine, and the Rhine were
made the first Roman roads, the prototypes of the present-day means of
communication.
The development of civilization and the arts along these great pathways
was rapid and extensive. Two of them, at least, gave birth to
architectural styles quite differing from other neighbouring types: the
_Romain-Germanique_--bordering along the Rhine and extending to Alsace
and the Vosges; and the _Romain-Bourguignon_, which followed the valley
of the Rhône from Bourgogne to the Mediterranean and the Italian
frontier, including all Provence.
The true source of the Rhône is in the Pennine Alps, where, in consort
with three other streams, the Aar, the Reuss, and the Ticino, it rises
in a cloven valley close to the lake of Brienz, amid that huge jumble of
mountain-tops, which differs so greatly from the popular conception of a
mountain range.
Dauphiné and Savoie are to-day comparatively unknown by parlour-car
travellers. Dauphiné, with its great historical associations, the wealth
and beauty of its architecture, the magnificence of its scenery, has
always had great attractions for the historian, the archæologist, and
the scholar; to the tourist, however, even to the French tourist, it
remained for many years a _terra incognita_. Yet no country could
present the traveller with a more wonderful succession of ever-changing
scenery, such a rich variety of landscape, ranging from verdant plain to
mountain glacier, from the gay and picturesque to the sublime and
terrible. Planted in the very heart of the French Alps, rising terrace
above terrace from the lowlands of the Rhône to the most stupendous
heights, Dauphiné may with reason claim to be the worthy rival of
Switzerland.
The romantic associations of "La Grande Chartreuse"; of the charming
valley towns of Sion and Aoste, famed alike in the history of Church and
State; and of the more splendidly appointed cities of Grenoble and
Chambéry, will make a new leaf in the books of most peoples'
experiences.
The rivers Durance, Isère, and Drôme drain the region into the more
ample basin of the Rhône, and the first of the three--for sheer beauty
and romantic picturesqueness--will perhaps rank first in all the world.
The chief associations of the Rhône valley with the Church are centred
around Lyon, Vienne, Avignon, and Arles. The associations of history--a
splendid and a varied past--stand foremost at Orange, Nîmes, Aix, and
Marseilles. It is not possible to deal here with the many _pays et pagi_
of the basin of the Rhône.
Of all, Provence--that golden land--stands foremost and compels
attention. One might praise it _ad infinitum_ in all its splendid
attributes and its glorious past, but one could not then do it justice;
better far that one should sum it up in two words--"Mistral's world."
The popes and the troubadours combined to cast a glamour over the "fair
land of Provence" which is irresistible. Here were architectural
monuments, arches, bridges, aqueducts, and arenas as great and as
splendid as the world has ever known. Aix-en-Provence, in King René's
time, was the gayest capital of Europe, and the influence of its arts
and literature spread to all parts.
To the south came first the Visigoths, then the conflicting and
repelling Ostrogoths; between them soon to supplant the Gallo-Roman
cultivation which had here grown so vigorously.
It was as late as the sixth century when the Ostrogoths held the
brilliant sunlit city of Arles; when follows a history--applicable as
well to most of all southern France--of many dreary centuries of
discordant races, of varying religious faiths, and adherence now to one
lord and master, and then to another.
Monuments of various eras remain; so numerously that one can rebuild for
themselves much that has disappeared for ever: palaces as at Avignon,
castles as at Tarascon and Beaucaire, and walled cities as at
Aigues-Morte. What limitless suggestion is in the thought of the
assembled throngs who peopled the tiers of the arenas and theatres of
Arles and Nîmes in days gone by. The sensation is mostly to be derived,
however, from thought and conjecture. The painful and nullifying
"_spectacles_" and "_courses des taureaux_," which periodically hold
forth to-day in these noble arenas, are mere travesties on their
splendid functions of the past. Much more satisfying--and withal more
artistic--are the theatrical representations in that magnificent outdoor
theatre at Orange; where so recently as the autumn of 1903 was given a
grand representation of dramatic art, with Madame Bernhardt, Coquelin,
and others of the galaxy which grace the French stage to-day, taking
part therein.
Provençal literature is a vast and varied subject, and the women of
Arles--the true Arlesians of the poet and romancer--are astonishingly
beautiful. Each of these subjects--to do them justice--would require
much ink and paper. Daudet, in "_Tartarin_," has these opening words, as
if no others were necessary in order to lead the way into a new world:
"IT WAS SEPTEMBER AND IT WAS PROVENCE." Frederic Mistral, in "Mirèio,"
has written the great modern epic of Provence, which depicts the life as
well as the literature of the ancient troubadours. The "Fountain of
Vaucluse" will carry one back still further in the ancient Provençal
atmosphere; to the days of Petrarch and Laura, and the "little fish of
Sorgues."
What the Romance language really was, authorities--if they be
authorities--differ. Hence it were perhaps well that no attempt should
be made here to define what others have failed to place, beyond this
observation, which is gathered from a source now lost to recollection,
but dating from a century ago at least:
"The southern or Romance language, the tongue of all the people who
obeyed Charlemagne in the south of Europe, proceeded from the
parent-vitiated Latin.
"The Provençaux assert, and the Spaniards deny, that the Spanish tongue
is derived from the original Romance, though neither the Italians nor
the French are willing to owe much to it as a parent, in spite of the
fact that Petrarch eulogized it, and the troubadours as well.
"The Toulousans roundly assert that the Provençal is the root of all
other dialects whatever (_vide Cazeneuve_). Most Spanish writers on the
other hand insist that the Provençal is derived from the Spanish (_vide
Coleccion de Poesias Castellanas; Madrid, 1779_)."
At all events the idiom, from whatever it may have sprung, took root,
propagated and flourished in the land of the Provençal troubadours.
Whatever may have been the real extent of the influences which went out
from Provence, it is certain that the marriage of Robert with
Constance--daughter of the first Count of Provence, about the year
1000--was the period of a great change in manners and customs
throughout the kingdom. Some even have asserted that this princess
brought in her train the troubadours who spread the taste for poetry and
its accompaniments throughout the north of France.
The "Provence rose," so celebrated in legend and literature, can hardly
be dismissed without a word; though, in truth, the casual traveller will
hardly know of its existence, unless he may have a sweet recollection of
some rural maid, who, with sleeves carefully rolled up, stood before her
favourite rose-tree, tenderly examining it, and driving away a buzzing
fly or a droning wasp.
These firstlings of the season are tended with great pride. The
distinctive "rose of Provence" is smaller, redder, and more elastic and
concentric than the _centifoliæ_ of the north, and for this reason,
likely, it appears the more charming to the eye of the native of the
north, who, if we are to believe the romanticists, is made a child again
by the mere contemplation of this lovely flower.
The glory of this rich red "Provence rose" is in dispute between
Provence and Provins, the ancient capital of La Brie; but the weight of
the argument appears to favour the former.
Below Arles and Nîmes the Rhône broadens out into a many-fingered
estuary, and mingles its Alpine flood with the blue waters of the
Mediterranean.
The delta has been formed by the activity and energy of the river
itself, from the fourth century--when it is known that Arles lay sixteen
miles from the sea--till to-day, when it is something like thirty. This
ceaseless carrying and filling has resulted in a new coast-line, which
not only has changed the topography of the region considerably, but may
be supposed to have actually worked to the commercial disadvantage of
the country round about.
The annual prolongation of the shores--the reclaimed water-front--is
about one hundred and sixty-four feet, hence some considerable gain is
accounted for, but whether to the nation or the "squatter" statistics do
not say.
The delta of the Rhône has been described by an expansive French writer
as: "Something quite separate from the rest of France. It is a wedge of
Greece and of the East thrust into Gaul. It came north a hundred (or
more) years ago and killed the Monarchy. It caught the value in, and
created the great war-song of the Republic."
There is a deal of subtlety in these few lines, and they are given here
because of their truth and applicability.
II
ST. ETIENNE DE CHALONS-SUR-SAÔNE
"The cathedral at Chalons," says Philip Gilbert Hamerton,--who knew the
entire region of the Saône better perhaps than any other
Anglo-Saxon,--"has twin towers, which, in the evening, at a distance,
recall Notre Dame (at Paris), and there are domes, too, as in the
capital."
An imaginative description surely, and one that is doubtless not without
truth were one able to first come upon this riverside city of mid-France
in the twilight, and by boat from the upper river.
Chalons is an ideally situated city, with a placidness which the slow
current of the Saône does not disturb. But its cathedral! It is no more
like its Parisian compeer than it is like the Pyramids of Egypt.
In the first place, the cathedral towers are a weak, effeminate
imitation of a prototype which itself must have been far removed from
Notre Dame, and they have been bolstered and battened in a shameful
fashion.
The cathedral at Chalons is about the most ancient-looking possession of
the city, which in other respects is quite modern, and, aside from its
charming situation and general attractiveness, takes no rank whatever as
a centre of ancient or mediæval art.
Its examples of Gallic architecture are not traceable to-day, and of
Roman remains it possesses none. As a Gallic stronghold,--it was never
more than that,--it appealed to Cæsar merely as a base from which to
advance or retreat, and its history at this time is not great or
abundant.
A Roman wall is supposed to have existed, but its remains are not
traceable to-day, though tradition has it that a quantity of its stones
were transported by the monk Bénigne for the rotunda which he built at
Dijon.
The city's era of great prosperity was the fifteenth and sixteenth
centuries, when its fortifications were built up anew, its cathedral
finished, and fourteen churches held forth.
From this high estate it has sadly fallen, and there is only its
decrepit cathedral, rebuilt after a seventeenth-century fire, and two
churches--one of them modern--to uphold its ecclesiastical dignity.
The towers of the cathedral are of the seventeenth century, but the
so-called "Deanery Tower" is more ancient, and suggestive of much that
is militant and very little that is churchly.
The interior has been restored, not wholly with success, but yet not
wholly spoiled.
In plan and arrangement it is a simple and severe church, but acceptable
enough when one contemplates changes made elsewhere. Here are to be seen
no debased copies of Greek or Roman orders; which is something to be
thankful for.
The arches of the nave and choir are strong and bold, but not of great
spread. The height of the nave, part of which has come down from the
thirteenth century, is ninety feet at least.
There are well-carved capitals to the pillars of the nave, and the
coloured glass of the windows of triforium and clerestory is rich
without rising to great beauty.
In general the style is decidedly a _mélange_, though the cathedral is
entitled to rank as a Gothic example. Its length is 350 feet.
The _maître-autel_ is one of the most elegant in France.
Modern improvement has cleared away much that was picturesque, but
around the cathedral are still left a few gabled houses, which serve to
preserve something of the mediæval setting which once held it.
The courtyard and its dependencies at the base of the "Deanery Tower"
are the chief artistic features. They appeal far more strongly than any
general accessory of the cathedral itself, and suggest that they once
must have been the components of a cloister.
The see was founded in the fifth century as a suffragan of Lyon.
III
ST. VINCENT DE MACON
The _Mastieo_ of the Romans was not the Macon of to-day, though, by
evolution, or corruption, or whatever the process may have been, the
name has come down to us as referring to the same place. The former city
did not border the river, but was seated on a height overlooking the
Saône, which flows by the doors of the present city of Macon.
Its site is endowed with most of the attributes included in the
definition of "commanding," and, though not grandly situated, is, from
any riverside view-point, attractive and pleasing.
When it comes to the polygonal towers of its olden cathedral, this
charming and pleasing view changes to that of one which is curious and
interesting. The cathedral of St. Vincent is a battered old ruin, and no
amount of restoration and rebuilding will ever endow it with any more
deserving qualities.
[Illustration: ST. VINCENT _de MACON_.]
The Revolution was responsible for its having withered away, as it was
also for the abolishment of the see of Macon.
The towers stand to-day--lowered somewhat from their former
proportions--gaunt and grim, and the rich Burgundian narthen, which lay
between, has been converted--not restored, mark you--into an inferior
sort of chapel.
The destruction that fell upon various parts of this old church might as
well have been more sweeping and razed it to the ground entirely. The
effect could not have been more disheartening.
Macon formerly had twelve churches. Now it has three--if we include this
poor fragment of its one-time cathedral. Between the Revolution and the
coronation of Napoleon I. the city was possessed of no place of worship.
Macon became an episcopal see, with Placide as its first bishop, in the
sixth century. It was suppressed in 1790.
The bridge which crosses the river to the suburb of St. Laurent is
credited as being the finest work of its kind crossing the Saône.
Hamerton has said that "its massive arches and piers, wedge-shaped to
meet the wind, are pleasant to contemplate after numerous festoons of
wire carrying a roadway of planks." This bridge was formerly surmounted,
at either end, with a castellated gateway, but, like many of these
accessories elsewhere, they have disappeared.
The famous bridge at Cahors (shown elsewhere in this book) is the best
example of such a bridge still existing in France.
As a "cathedral city," Macon will not take a high rank. The "great man"
of Macon was Lamartine. His birthplace is shown to visitors, but its
present appearance does not suggest the splendid appointments of its
description in that worthy's memoirs.
Macon is the _entrepôt_ of the abundant and excellent _vin du
Bourgogne_, and the strictly popular repute of the city rests entirely
on this fact.
[Illustration: ST. JEAN _de LYON_.]
IV
ST. JEAN DE LYON
The Lyonnais is the name given to that region lying somewhat to the
westward of the city of Lyon. It is divided into three distinct parts,
_le Lyonnais_ proper, _le Forez_, and _le Beaujolais_. Its chief
appellation comes from that of its chief city, which in turn is more
than vague as to its etymology: _Lugdunum_ we know, of course, and we
can trace its evolution even unto the Anglicized Lyons, but when
philologists, antiquarians, and "pedants of mere pretence" ask us to
choose between _le corbeau_--_lougon_, _un eminence_--_dounon_,
_lone_--an arm of a river, and _dun_ the Celtic word for height, we are
amazed, and are willing enough to leave the solving of the problem to
those who will find a greater pleasure therein.
Lyon is a widely-spread city, of magnificent proportions and pleasing
aspect, situated as it is on the banks of two majestic, though
characteristically different rivers, the Rhône and the Saône.
In many respects it is an ideally laid-out city, and the scene from the
heights of Fourvière at night, when the city is brilliant with
many-lighted workshops, is a wonderfully near approach to fairy-land.
Whether the remarkable symmetry of the city's streets and plan is the
result of the genius of a past day, or of the modern progressive spirit,
is in some doubt. Certainly it must originally have been a delightfully
planned city, and the spirit of modernity--though great--has not by any
means wholly eradicated its whilom charm of another day.
It may be remarked here that about the only navigable portion of the
none too placid Rhône is found from here to Avignon and Arles, to which
points, in summer at least, steam-craft--of sorts--carry passengers with
expedition and economy--down-stream; the journey up-river will amaze one
by the potency of the flood of this torrential stream--so different from
the slow-going Saône.
The present diocese, of which the see of Lyon is the head, comprehends
the Department of the Rhône et Loire. It is known under the double
vocable of Lyon et Vienne, and is the outgrowth of the more ancient
ecclesiastical province of Vienne, whose archiepiscopal dignity was
domiciled in St. Maurice.
It was in the second century that St. Pothin, an Asiatic Greek, came to
the ancient province of Lyon as archbishop. The title carried with it
that of primate of all Gaul: hence the importance of the see, from the
earliest times, may be inferred.
The architectural remains upon which is built the flamboyant Gothic
church of St. Nizier are supposed to be those of the primitive cathedral
in which St. Pothin and St. Irenæus celebrated the holy rites. The claim
is made, of course, not without a show of justification therefor, but it
is a far cry from the second century of our era to this late day; and
the sacristan's words are not convincing, in view of the doubts which
many non-local experts have cast upon the assertion. The present _Église
St. Nizier_ is furthermore dedicated to a churchman who lived as late as
the sixth century.
The present cathedral of St. Jean dates from the early years of the
twelfth century, but there remains to-day another work closely allied
with episcopal affairs--the stone bridge which spans the Saône, and
which was built some two hundred years before the present cathedral by
Archbishop Humbert.
Though a bridge across a river is an essentially practical and utile
thing, it is, perhaps, in a way, as worthy a work for a generous and
masterful prelate as church-building itself. Certainly this was the case
with Humbert's bridge, he having designed the structure, superintended
its erection, and assumed the expense thereof. It is recorded that this
worthy churchman gained many adherents for the faith, so it may be
assumed that he builded as well as he knew.
St. Jean de Lyon dates from 1180, and presents many architectural
anomalies in its constructive elements, though the all-pervading Gothic
is in the ascendant. From this height downward, through various
interpolations, are seen suggestions of many varieties and styles of
church-building. There is, too, an intimation of a motif essentially
pagan if one attempts to explain the vagaries of some of the
ornamentation of the unusual septagonal Lombard choir. This is further
inferred when it is known that a former temple to Augustus stood on the
same site. If this be so, the reasoning is complete, and the classical
ornament here is of a very early date.
The fabric of the cathedral is, in the main, of a warm-coloured
freestone, not unlike dark marble, but without its brilliancy and
surface. It comes from the heights of Fourvière,--on whose haunches the
cathedral sits,--and by virtue of the act of foundation it may be
quarried at any time, free of all cost, for use by the Church.
The situation of this cathedral is most attractive; indeed its greatest
charm may be said to be its situation, so very picturesquely disposed is
it, with the Quai de l'Archevêché between it and the river Saône.
The choir itself--after allowing for the interpolation of the early
non-Christian fragments--is the most consistently pleasing portion. It
presents in general a fairly pure, early Gothic design. Curiously
enough, this choir sits below the level of the nave and presents, in the
interior view, an unusual effect of amplitude.
With the nave of the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries, the style
becomes more mixed--localized, one may say--if only consistent details
might be traced. At any rate, the style grows perceptibly heavier and
more involved, without the simplicity of pre-Gothic work. Finally, as
one comes to the heavily capped towers, there is little of grace and
beauty left.
In detail, at least, if not in general, St. Jean runs quite the whole
scale of mediæval architectural style--from the pure Romanesque to the
definite, if rather mixed, Gothic.
Of the later elements, the most remarkable is the fifteenth-century
Bourbon chapel, built by Cardinal Charles and his brother Pierre. This
chapel presents the usual richness and luxuriance of its time. If all
things are considered, it is the chief feature of interest within the
walls.
The west front has triple portals, reminiscent, as to dimensions, of
Amiens, though by no means so grandly peopled with statues; the heavy,
stunted towers, too, are not unlike those of Amiens. These twin towers
are of a decidedly heavy order, and are not beautiful, either as
distinct features or as a component of the ensemble. Quite in keeping
also are the chief decorations of the façade, which are principally a
series of superimposed medallions, depicting, variously, the signs of
the zodiac, scenes from the life of St. Jean, and yet others suggesting
scenes and incidents from Genesis, with an admixture of heraldic
symbolism which is here quite meaningless and singularly inappropriate,
while still other entablatures present scenes illustrating the "Legend
of St. Nicholas" and "The Law of Aristotle."
The general effect of the exterior, the façade in particular, is very
dark, and except in a bright sunlight--which is usual--is indeed gloomy.
In all probability, this is due to the discolouring of the soft stone of
which the cathedral is built, as the same effect is scarcely to be
remarked in the interior.
In a tower on the south side--much lower, and not so clumsily built up
as the twin towers--hangs one of the greatest _bourdons_ in France. It
was cast in 1662, and weighs ten thousand kilos.
Another curiosity of a like nature is to be seen in the interior, an
astronomical clock--known to Mr. Tristram as "that great clock of
Lippius of Basle." Possessed of a crowing cock and the usual toy-book
attributes, this great clock is a source of perennial pride to the
native and the makers of guide-books. Sterne, too, it would appear,
waxed unduly enthusiastic over this really ingenious thing of wheels and
cogs. He said: "I never understood the least of mechanism. I declare I
was never able yet to comprehend the principles of a squirrel-cage or a
knife-grinder's wheel, yet I will go see this wonderful clock the first
thing I do." When he did see it, he quaintly observed that "it was all
out of joint."
The rather crude coloured glass--though it is precious glass, for it
dates from the thirteenth century, in part--sets off bountifully an
interior which would otherwise appear somewhat austere.
In the nave is a marble pulpit which has been carved with more than
usual skill. It ranks with that in St. Maurice, at Vienne, as one of the
most beautiful in France.
The cathedral possesses two _reliques_ of real importance in the crosses
which are placed to the left and right of the high-altar. These are
conserved by a unique custom, in memory of an attempt made by a _concile
génêral_ of the church, held in Lyon in 1274, to reconcile the Latin and
Greek forms of religion.
The sacristy, in which the bountiful, though not historic, _trésor_ is
kept, is in the south transept.
Among the archives of the cathedral there are, says a local antiquary,
documents of a testamentary nature, which provided the means for the
up-keep of the fabric without expense to the church, until well into the
eighteenth century.
On the apex of the height which rises above the cathedral is the
Basilique de Notre Dame de Fourvière--"one of those places of
pilgrimage, the most venerated in all the world," says a confident
French writer. This may be so; it overlooks ground which has long been
hallowed by the Church, to a far greater degree than many other parts,
but, like so many places of pilgrimage of a modern day, its nondescript
religious edifice is enough to make the church-lover willingly pass it
by. The site is that of the ancient _Forum Vetus_ of the Romans, and as
such is more appealing to most than as a place of pilgrimage.
V
ST. MAURICE DE VIENNE
"At the feet of seven mountains; on the banks of a large river; an
antique city and a _cité neuve_."
--FRANÇOIS PONSARD.
Though widowed to-day of its bishop's throne, Vienne enjoys with Lyon
the distinction of having its name attached to an episcopal see. The
ancient archbishopric ruled over what was known as the Province of
Vienne, which, if not more ancient than that of Lyon, dates from the
same century--the second of our Christian era--and probably from a few
years anterior, as it is known that St. Crescent, the first prelate of
the diocese, was firmly established here as early as 118 A. D. In any
event, it was one of the earliest centres of Christianity north of the
Alps.
To-day, being merged with the diocese of Lyon, Vienne is seldom credited
as being a cathedral city. Locally the claim is very strongly made, but
the Mediterranean tourist never finds this out, unless, perchance, he
"drops off" from the railway in order to make acquaintance with that
remarkable Roman temple to Augustus, of which he may have heard.
Then he will learn from the _habitants_ that by far their greatest
respect and pride are for their _ancienne Cathédrale de St. Maurice_,
which sits boldly upon a terrace dominating the course of the river
Rhône.
In many respects St. Maurice de Vienne will strike the student and lover
of architecture as being one of the most lively and appealing edifices
of its kind. The Lombard origin of many of its features is without
question; notably the delightful gallery on the north side, with its
supporting columns of many grotesque shapes.
Again the parapet and terrace which precede this church, the
ground-plan, and some of the elevations are pure Lombard in motive.
There are no transepts and no ancient chapels at the eastern
termination; the windows running down to the pavement. This, however,
does not make for an appearance at all _outré_--quite the reverse is the
case. The general effect of the entire internal distribution of parts,
with its fine approach from the nave to the sanctuary and choir, is
exceedingly notable.
Of the remains of the edifice, which was erected on the foundations of a
still earlier church, in 1052 (reconstructed in 1515), we have those of
the primitive, but rich, ornamentation of the façade as the most
interesting and appealing.
The north doorway, too, indicates in its curious _bas-reliefs_, of the
twelfth or thirteenth centuries, a luxuriance which in the north--in the
Romanesque churches at least--came only with later centuries.
There are few accessories of note to be seen in the choir or chapels: a
painting of St. Maurice by Desgoffés, a small quantity of
fourteenth-century glass, the mausoleum of Cardinal de Montmorin, a
sixteenth-century tomb, and, in one of the chapels, some modern glass of
more than usual brilliance.
The pulpit is notable, and, with that in St. Jean de Lyon, ranks as one
of the most elaborate in France.
For the rest, one's admiration for St. Maurice de Vienne must rest on
the glorious antiquity of the city, as a centre of civilizing and
Christianizing influence.
When Pope Paschal II. (1099-1118) confirmed the metropolitan privileges
of Vienne, and sent the _pallium_ to its archbishop, he assigned to him
as suffragans the bishops of Grenoble, Valence, Dié, Viviers, Geneva,
and St. Jean de Maurienne, and conferred upon him the honorary office of
primate over Monstiers in Tarentaise. Still later, Calixtus II.
(1119-24) favoured the archbishopric still further by not only
confirming the privileges which had gone before, but investing the
archbishop with the still higher dignity of the office of primate over
the seven ecclesiastical Provinces of Vienne, Bourges, Bordeaux, Auch,
Narbonne, Aix, and Embrun.
[Illustration]
VI
ST. APOLLINAIRE DE VALENCE
Valence, the Valentia of the Romans, is variously supposed to be
situated in southeastern France, Provence, and the Cevennes. For this
reason it will be difficult for the traveller to locate his guide-book
reference thereto.
It is, however, located in the Rhône valley on the very banks of that
turgid river, and it seems inexplicable that the makers of the
red-covered couriers do not place it more definitely; particularly in
that it is historically so important a centre.
The most that can usually be garnered by the curious is that it is "well
built in parts, and that those parts only are of interest to the
traveller." As a matter of fact, they are nothing of the sort; and the
boulevards, of which so much is made, are really very insignificant; so,
too, are the cafés and restaurants, to which far more space is usually
given than to the claim of Valence as an early centre of Christianity.
Valence is not a great centre of population, and is appealing by reason
of its charming situation, in a sort of amphitheatre, before which runs
the swift-flowing Rhône. There is no great squalor, but there is a
picturesqueness and charm which is wholly dispelled in the newer
quarters, of which the guide-books speak.
There is, moreover, in the cathedral of St. Apollinaire, a small but
highly interesting "Romanesque-Auvergnian" cathedral; rebuilt and
reconsecrated by Urban II., in the eleventh century, and again
reconstructed, on an entirely new plan, in 1604. Besides this curious
church there is a "Protestant temple," which occupies the former chapel
of the ancient Abbey of St. Rufus, that should have a singularly
appealing interest for English-speaking folk.
The préfecture occupies another portion of the abbey, which in its
various disintegrated parts is worthy of more than passing
consideration.
The bishopric was founded here at Valence in the fourth century--when
Emelien became the first bishop. The see endures to-day as a suffragan
of Avignon; whereas formerly it owed obedience to Vienne (now Lyon et
Vienne).
The ancient cathedral of St. Apollinaire is almost wholly conceived and
executed in what has come to be known as the Lombard style.
The main body of the church is preceded on the west by an extravagant
rectangular tower, beneath which is the portal or entrance; if, as in
the present instance, the comprehensive meaning of the word suggests
something more splendid than a mere doorway.
There has been remarked before now that there is a suggestion of the
Corinthian order in the columns of both the inside and outside of the
church. This is a true enough detail of Lombard forms as it was of the
Roman style, which in turn was borrowed from the Greeks. In later times
the neo-classical details of the late Renaissance period produced quite
a different effect, and were in no way comparable to the use of this
detail in the Lombard and Romanesque churches.
In St. Apollinaire, too, are to be remarked the unusual arch formed of a
rounded trefoil. This is found in both the towers, and is also seen in
St. Maurice at Vienne, but not again until the country far to the
northward and eastward is reached, where they are more frequent,
therefore their use here may be considered simply as an interpolation
brought from some other soil, rather than an original conception of the
local builder.
Here also is seen the unusual combination of an angular pointed arch in
conjunction with the round-headed Lombard variety. This, in alternation
for a considerable space, on the south side of the cathedral. It is a
feature perhaps not worth mentioning, except from the fact that both the
trefoil and wedge-pointed arch are singularly unbeautiful and little in
keeping with an otherwise purely southern structure.
The aisles of St. Apollinaire, like those of Notre Dame de la Grande at
Poitiers, and many other Lombardic churches, are singularly narrow,
which of course appears to lengthen them out interminably.
If any distinctive style can be given this small but interesting
cathedral, it may well be called the style of Lyonnaise.
It dates from the twelfth century as to its foundations, but was rebuilt
on practically a new ground-plan in 1604.
To-day it is cruciform after the late elongated style, with lengthy
transepts and lofty aisles.
The chief feature to be observed of its exterior is its heavy square
tower (187 feet) of four stories. It is not beautiful, and was rebuilt
in the middle nineteenth century, but it is imposing and groups
satisfactorily enough with the _ensemble_ round about. Beneath this
tower is a fine porch worked in Crussol marble.
There is no triforium or clerestory. In the choir is a cenotaph in white
marble to Pius VI., who was exiled in Valence, and who died here in
1799. It is surmounted by a bust by Canova, whose work it has become the
fashion to admire sedulously.
VII
CATHÉDRALE DE VIVIERS
The bishopric of Viviers is a suffragan of Avignon, and is possessed of
a tiny cathedral church, which, in spite of its diminutive proportions,
overtops quite all the other buildings of this ancient capital of the
Vivarais.
The city is a most picturesque setting for any shrine, with the narrow,
tortuous streets--though slummy ones--winding to the cliff-top on which
the city sits high above the waters of the Rhône.
The choir of this cathedral is the only portion which warrants remark.
It is of the fourteenth century, and has no aisles. It is in the
accepted Gothic style, but this again is coerced by the Romanesque
flanking tower, which, to all intents and purposes, when viewed from
afar, might well be taken for a later Renaissance work.
A nearer view dissects this tower into really beautiful parts. The base
is square, but above--in an addition of the fifteenth century--it blooms
forth into an octagon of quite original proportions.
In the choir are some Gobelin tapestries and paintings by Mignard;
otherwise there are no artistic attributes to be remarked.
VIII
NOTRE DAME D'ORANGE
The independent principality of Orange (which had existed since the
eleventh century), with the papal State of Avignon, the tiny Comté
Venaissin, and a small part of Provence were welded into the Department
of Vaucluse in the redistribution of political divisions under Napoleon
I. The house of Nassau retains to-day the honorary title of Princes of
Orange, borne by the heir apparent to the throne of Holland. More
anciently the city was known as the Roman _Arausio_, and is yet famous
for its remarkable Roman remains, the chief of which are its triumphal
arch and theatre--one of the largest and most magnificent, if not
actually the largest, of its era.
The history of the church at Orange is far more interesting and notable
than that of its rather lame apology for a cathedral of rank. The see
succumbed in 1790 in favour of Avignon, an archbishopric, and Valence,
one of its suffragans.
The persecution and oppression of the Protestants of Orange and Dauphiné
are well-recorded facts of history.
A supposedly liberal and tolerant maker of guide-books (in English) has
given inhabitants of Orange a hard reputation by classing them as a
"ferocious people." This rather unfair method of estimating their
latter-day characteristics is based upon the fact that over three
hundred perished here by the guillotine during the first three months of
the Revolution. It were better had he told us something of the
architectural treasures of this _ville de l'art célèbre_. He does
mention the chief, also that "the town has many mosquitoes," but, as for
churches, he says not a word.
The first bishop was St. Luce, who was settled here in the fourth
century, at the same time that St. Ruff came to Avignon.
As a bishopric, Orange was under the control of St. Trophime's
successors at Arles.
Notre Dame d'Orange is a work of little architectural pretence, though
its antiquity is great as to certain portions of its walls. The oldest
portion dates from 1085, though there is little to distinguish it from
the more modern additions and reparations, and is in no way suggestive
of the splendour with which the ancient Roman theatre and arch were
endowed.
The chief attribute to be remarked is the extreme width of nave, which
dates from 1085 to 1126. The cathedral itself, however, is not an
architectural example of any appealing interest whatever, and pales
utterly before the magnificent and splendid preservations of secular
Roman times.
Since, however, Orange is a city reminiscent of so early a period of
Christianity as the fourth century, it is to be presumed that other
Christian edifices of note may have at one time existed: if so, no very
vivid history of them appears to have been left behind, and certainly no
such tangible expressions of the art of church-building as are seen in
the neighbouring cities of the Rhône valley.
[Illustration]
IX
ST. VÉRAN DE CAVAILLON
"It is the plain of Cavaillon which is the market-garden of Avignon;
from whence come the panniers of vegetables and fruits, the _buissons
d'artichauts_, and the melons of 'high reputation.'"
Such is the rather free paraphrase of a most charmingly expressed
observation on this Provençal land of plenty, written by an
eighteenth-century Frenchman.
If it was true in those days, it is no less true to-day, and, though
this book is more concerned with churches than with _potagerie_, the
observation is made that this fact may have had not a little to do with
the early foundation of the church, here in a plenteous region, where it
was more likely to prosper than in an impoverished land.
The bishopric was founded in the fifth century by St. Genialis, and it
endured constantly until the suppression in 1790.
All interest in Cavaillon, in spite of its other not inconsiderable
claims, will be centred around its ancient cathedral of St. Véran,
immediately one comes into contact therewith.
The present structure is built upon a very ancient foundation; some have
said that the primitive church was of the seventh century. This present
cathedral was consecrated by Pope Innocent IV. in person, in 1259, and
for that reason possesses a considerable interest which it would
otherwise lack.
Externally the most remarkable feature is the arrangement and decoration
of the apside--there is hardly enough of it to come within the
classification of the chevet. Here the quintuple flanks, or sustaining
walls, are framed each with a pair of columns, of graceful enough
proportions in themselves, but possessed of inordinately heavy capitals.
An octagonal cupola, an unusual, and in this case a not very beautiful
feature, crowns the centre of the nave. In reality it serves the purpose
of a lantern, and allows a dubious light to trickle through into the
interior, which is singularly gloomy.
To the right of the nave is a curiously attenuated _clocher_, which
bears a clock-face of minute proportions, and holds a clanging
_bourdon_, which, judging from its voice, must be as proportionately
large as the clock-face is small.
Beneath this tower is a doorway leading from the nave to the cloister, a
beautiful work dating from a much earlier period than the church itself.
This cloister is not unlike that of St. Trophime at Arles, and, while
plain and simple in its general plan of rounded arches and vaulting, is
beautifully worked in stone, and admirably preserved. In spite of its
severity, there is no suggestion of crudity, and there is an elegance
and richness in its sculptured columns and capitals which is unusual in
ecclesiastical work of the time.
The interior of this church is quite as interesting as the exterior.
There is an ample, though aisleless, nave, which, though singularly dark
and gloomy, suggests a vastness which is perhaps really not justified
by the actual state of affairs.
A very curious arrangement is that the supporting wall-pillars--in this
case a sort of buttress, like those of the apside--serve to frame or
enclose a series of deep-vaulted side chapels. The effect of this is
that all of the flow of light, which might enter by the lower range of
windows, is practically cut off from the nave. What refulgence there
is--and it is not by any means of the dazzling variety--comes in through
the before-mentioned octagon and the upper windows of the nave.
In a chapel--the gift of Philippe de Cabassole, a friend of
Petrarch's--is a funeral monument which will even more forcibly recall
the name and association of the poet. It is a seventeenth-century tomb
of Bishop Jean de Sade, a descendant of the famous Laura, whose ashes
formerly lay in the Église des Cordeliers at Avignon, but which were, it
is to be feared, scattered to the winds by the Revolutionary fury.
At the summit of Mont St. Jacques, which rises high above the town, is
the ancient _Ermitage de St. Véran_; a place of local pilgrimage, but
not otherwise greatly celebrated.
X
NOTRE DAME DES DOMS D'AVIGNON
It would be difficult to say with precision whether Avignon were more
closely connected in the average mind with the former papal splendour,
with Petrarch and his Laura, or with the famous Félibrage.
Avignon literally reeks with sentimental associations of a most healthy
kind. No probable line of thought suggested by Avignon's historied and
romantic past will intimate even the mawkish, the sordid, or the banal.
It is, in almost limitless suggestion, the city of France above all
others in which to linger and drink in the life of its past and present
to one's fullest capacities.
For the "literary pilgrim," first and foremost will be Avignon's
association with Petrarch, or rather he with it. For this reason it
shall be disposed of immediately, though not in one word, or ten; that
would be impossible.
[Illustration: _Notre Dame des Doms d'Avignon_]
"'The grave of Laura!' said I. 'Indeed, my dear sir, I am obliged to you
for having mentioned it,'" were the words with which the local
bookseller was addressed by an eighteenth-century traveller. "'Otherwise
one might have gone away, to their everlasting sorrow and shame, without
having seen this curiosity of your city.'"
The same record of travel describes the guardian of this shrine as "a
converted Jew, who, from one year's end to another, has but two duties
to perform, which he most punctually attends to. The one to take care of
the grave of Laura, and to show it to strangers, the other to give them
information respecting all the curiosities. Before his conversion, he
stood at the corner by the Hôtel de Ville offering lottery tickets to
passers-by, and asking, till he was hoarse, if they had anything to
sell. Not a soul took the least notice of him. His beard proved a
detriment in all his speculations. Now that he has become a Christian,
it is wonderful how everything thrives with him."
At the very end of the Rue des Lices will be found the last remains of
the Église des Cordeliers--reduced at the Revolution to a mere tower and
its walls. Here may be seen the spot where was the tomb of Laura de
Sade. Arthur Young, writing just before the Revolution, described it as
below; though since that time still other changes have taken place, with
the result that "Laura's Grave" is little more than a memory to-day, and
a vague one at that.
"The grave is nothing but a stone in the pavement, with a figure
engraved on it already partly effaced, surrounded by an inscription in
Gothic letters, and another on the wall adjoining, with the armorial
bearings of the De Sade family."
To-day nothing but the site--the location--of the tomb is still there,
the before-mentioned details having entirely disappeared. The vault was
apparently broken open at the Revolution, and its ashes scattered. It
was here at Avignon, in the Église de St. Claire, as Petrarch himself
has recorded, that he first met Laura de Sade.
The present mood is an appropriate one in which to continue the
Petrarchian pilgrimage countryward--to the famous Vaucluse. Here
Petrarch came as a boy, in 1313, and, if one chooses, he may have his
_déjeuner_ at the _Hôtel Pétrarque et Laure_; not the same, of course,
of which Petrarch wrote in praise of its fish of Sorgues; but you will
have them as a course at lunch nevertheless. Here, too, the famed
_Fontaine_ first comes to light and air; and above it hangs "Petrarch's
Castle," which is not Petrarch's castle, nor ever was. It belonged
originally to the bishops of Cavaillon, but it is possible that Petrarch
was a guest there at various times, as we know he was at the more
magnificent _Palais des Papes_ at Avignon.
This château of the bishops hangs perilously on a brow which rises high
above the torrential _Fontaine_, and, if sentiment will not allow of its
being otherwise ignored, it is permissible to visit it, if one is so
inclined. No special hardship is involved, and no great adventure is
likely to result from this journey countryward. Tourists have been known
to do the thing before "just to get a few snapshots of the fountain."
As to why the palace of the popes came into being at Avignon is a
question which suggests the possibilities of the making of a big book.
The popes came to Avignon at the time of the Italian partition, on the
strength of having acquired a grant of the city from Joanna of Naples,
for which they were supposed to give eighty thousand golden crowns.
They never paid the bill, however; from which fact it would appear that
financial juggling was born at a much earlier period than has hitherto
been supposed.
Seven popes reigned here, from 1305 to 1370; when, on the termination of
the Schism, it became the residence of a papal legate. Subsequently
Louis XIV. seized the city, in revenge for an alleged affront to his
ambassador, and Louis XV. also held it for ten years.
The curious fact is here recalled that, by the treaty of Tolentino (12th
February, 1797), the papal power at Rome conceded formally for the first
time--to Napoleon I.--their ancient territory of Avignon. On the terms
of this treaty alone was Pope Pius allowed to remain nominal master of
even shreds of the patrimony of St. Peter.
The significant events of Avignon's history are too great in purport and
number to be even catalogued here, but the magnificent papal residence,
from its very magnitude and luxuriance, compels attention as one of the
great architectural glories, not only of France, but of all Europe as
well.
Here sat, for the major portion of the fourteenth century, the papal
court of Avignon; which the uncharitable have called a synonym for
profligacy, veniality, and luxurious degeneracy. Here, of course, were
held the conclaves by which the popes of that century were elected;
significantly they were all Frenchmen, which would seem to point to the
fact of corruption of some sort, if nothing more.
Rienzi, the last of the tribunes, was a prisoner within the walls of
this great papal stronghold, and Simone Memmi of Sienna was brought
therefrom to decorate the walls of the popes' private chapel; Petrarch
was _persona grata_ here, and many other notables were frequenters of
its hospitality.
The palace walls rise to a height of nearly ninety feet, and its
battlemented towers add another fifty; from which one may infer that its
stability was great; an effect which is still further sustained when the
great thickness of its sustaining walls is remarked, and the infrequent
piercings of windows and doorways.
This vast edifice was commenced by Pope Clement V. in the early years of
the thirteenth century, but nothing more than the foundations of his
work were left, when Benedict XII., thirty years later, gave the work
into the hands of Peter Obreri--who must have been the Viollet-le-Duc
of his time.
Revolution's destroying power played its part here, as generally
throughout France, in defacing shrines, monuments, and edifices, civil
and ecclesiastical, with little regard for sentiment and absolutely none
for reason.
The mob attacked the papal palace with results more disastrous than the
accumulated debasement of preceding centuries. The later régime, which
turned the magnificent halls of this fortress-like palace into a mere
barracks--as it is to-day--was quite as iconoclastic in its temperament.
One may realize here, to the full, just how far a great and noble
achievement of the art and devotion of a past age may sink. The ancient
papal palace at Avignon--the former seat of the power of the Roman
Catholic religion--has become a mere barracks! To contemplate it is more
sad even than to see a great church turned into a stable or an
abattoir--as can yet be seen in France.
In its plan this magnificent building preserves its outlines, but its
splendour of embellishment has very nearly been eradicated, as may be
observed if one will crave entrance of the military incumbent.
[Illustration: VILLENEUVE-. _les-AVIGNON_]
In 1376 Pope Gregory XI. left Avignon for Rome,--after him came the two
anti-popes,--and thus ended what Petrarch has called "_L'Empia
Babilonia_."
The cathedral of Notre Dame des Doms pales perceptibly before the
splendid dimensions of the papal palace, which formerly encompassed a
church of its own of much more artistic worth.
In one respect only does the cathedral lend a desirable note to the
_ensemble_. This, by reason of its commanding situation--at the apex of
the Rocher des Doms--and by the gilded statue of the Virgin which
surmounts the tower, and supplies just the right quality of colour and
life to a structure which would be otherwise far from brilliant.
From the opposite bank of the Rhône--from Villeneuve-les-Avignon--the
view of the parent city, the papal residence, the cathedral, and that
unusual southern attribute, the _beffroi_, all combine in a most
glorious picture of a superb beauty; quite rivalling--though in a far
different manner--that "plague spot of immorality,"--Monte Carlo, which
is mostly thought to hold the palm for the sheer beauty of natural
situation.
The cathedral is chiefly of the twelfth century, though even a near-by
exterior view does not suggest any of the Gothic tendencies of that era.
It is more like the heavy bungling style which came in with the
Renaissance; but it is not that either, hence it must be classed as a
unique variety, though of the period when the transition from the
Romanesque to Gothic was making inroads elsewhere.
It has been said that the structure dates in part from the time of
Charlemagne, but, if so, the usual splendid appointments of the true
Charlemagnian manner are sadly lacking. There may be constructive
foundations of the eleventh century, but they are in no way distinctive,
and certainly lend no liveliness to a building which must ever be ranked
as unworthy of the splendid environment.
As a church of cathedral rank, it is a tiny edifice when compared with
the glorious northern ground-plans: it is not much more than two hundred
feet in length, and has a width which must be considerably less than
fifty feet.
The entrance, at the top of a long, winding stair which rises from the
street-level of the Place du Palais to the platform of the rock, is
essentially pagan in its aspect; indeed it is said to have previously
formed the portal of a pagan temple which at one time stood upon the
site. If this be so, this great doorway--for it is far larger in its
proportions than any other detail--is the most ancient of all the
interior or exterior features.
The high pediment and roof may be pointed Gothic, or it may not; at any
rate, it is in but the very rudimentary stage. Authorities do not agree;
which carries the suggestion still further that the cathedral at Avignon
is of itself a queer, hybrid thing in its style, and with not a tithe of
the interest possessed by its more magnificent neighbour.
The western tower, while not of great proportions, is rather more
massive than the proportions of the church body can well carry. What
decoration it possesses carries the pagan suggestion still further, with
its superimposed fluted pillars and Corinthian columns.
The gloomy interior is depressing in the extreme, and whatever
attributes of interest that it has are largely discounted by their
unattractive setting.
There are a number of old paintings, which, though they are not the work
of artists of fame, might possibly prove to be of creditable
workmanship, could one but see them through the gloom. In the
before-mentioned porch are some frescoes by Simone Memmi, executed by
him in the fourteenth century, when he came from Sienna to do the
decorations in the palace.
The side chapels are all of the fourteenth century; that of St. Joseph,
now forming the antechamber of the sacristy, contains a noteworthy
Gothic tomb and monument of Pope John XXII. It is much mutilated to-day,
and is only interesting because of the personality connected therewith.
The custodian or caretaker is in this case a most persistently voluble
person, who will give the visitor little peace unless he stands by and
hears her story through, or flees the place,--which is preferable.
The niches of this highly florid Gothic tomb were despoiled of their
statues at the Revolution, and the recumbent effigy of the Pope has been
greatly disfigured. A much simpler monument, and one quite as
interesting, to another Pope, Benedict XII.,--he who was responsible for
the magnificence of the papal palace,--is in a chapel in the north aisle
of the nave, but the _cicerone_ has apparently no pride in this
particular shrine.
An ancient (pagan?) altar is preserved in the nave. It is not
beautiful, but it is undoubtedly very ancient and likewise very curious.
The chief accessory of interest for all will doubtless prove to be the
twelfth-century papal throne. It is of a pure white marble, rather cold
to contemplate, but livened here and there with superimposed gold
ornament. What decoration there is, chiefly figures representing the
bull of St. Luke and the lion of St. Mark, is simple and severe, as
befitted papal dignity. To-day it serves the archbishop of the diocese
as his throne of dignity, and must inspire that worthy with ambitious
hopes.
The chapter of the cathedral at Avignon--as we learn from history--wears
purple, in company with cardinals and kings, at all celebrations of the
High Mass of Clara de Falkenstein. From a well-worn vellum quarto in the
library at Avignon one may read the legend which recounts the connection
of Ste. Clara de Mont Falcone with the mystery of the Holy Trinity; from
which circumstance the honour and dignity of the purple has been granted
to the prelates of the cathedral.
No mention of Avignon, or of Arles, or of Nîmes could well be made
without a reference to the revival of Provençal literature brought about
by the famous "Félibrage," that brotherhood founded by seven poets, of
whom Frederic Mistral is the most popularly known.
The subject is too vast, and too vastly interesting to be slighted here,
so perforce mere mention must suffice.
The word Félibre was suggested by Mistral, who found it in an old hymn.
Its etymology is uncertain, but possibly it is from the Greek, meaning
"a lover of the beautiful."
The original number of the Félibres was seven, and they first met on the
fête-day of Ste. Estelle; in whose honour they adopted the seven-pointed
star as their emblem. Significantly, the number seven has much to do
with the Félibres and Avignon alike. The enthusiastic Félibre tells of
Avignon's seven churches, its seven gates, seven colleges, seven
hospitals, and seven popes--who reigned at Avignon for seven decades;
and further that the word Félibre has seven letters, as, also, has the
name of Mistral, one of its seven founders--who took seven years in
writing his epics.
[Illustration: NOTRE DAME _des DOMS d'AVIGNON_]
The machicolated walls, towers, and gateways of Avignon, which
protected the city in mediæval times, and--history tells us--sheltered
twice as many souls as now, are in a remarkable state of preservation
and completeness, and rank foremost among the masterworks of
fortification of their time. This outer wall, or _enceinte_, was built
at the instigation of Clement VI., in 1349, and was the work of but
fourteen years.
A hideously decorated building opposite the papal palace--now the
_Conservatoire de Musique_--was formerly the papal mint.
The ruined bridge of St. Bénezet, built in the twelfth century, is a
remarkable example of the engineering skill of the time. Surmounting the
four remaining arches--still perfect as to their configuration--is a
tiny chapel dedicated to St. Nicholas, which formerly contained
_reliques_ of St. Bénezet.
The extraordinary circumstance which led up to the building of this
bridge seems legendary, to say the least.
It is recorded that St. Bénezet, its founder, who was a mere shepherd,
became inspired by God to undertake this great work. The inspiration
must likewise have brought with it not a little of the uncommon skill of
the bridge-builder, and, considering the extent and scope of the
projected work, something of the spirit of benefaction as well.
The foundation was laid in 1171, and it was completed, after seventeen
years of labour, in 1188.
On this bridge, near the entrance to the city, was erected a hospital of
religious persons, who were denominated _Les Frères du Pont_, their
offices being to preserve the fabric, and to afford succour to all
manner of travellers.
The boldness and utility of this undertaking,--it being the only means
of communication between Avignon and the French territory beyond the
Rhône,--as well as the permanency assured to it by the annexing of a
religious foundation, cannot fail to grant to the memory of its holy
founder something more than a due share of veneration on behalf of his
genius and perspicacity.
XI
ST. SIFFREIN DE CARPENTRAS
The tiny city of Carpentras, most picturesquely situated on the equally
diminutive river Auzon which enters the Rhône between Orange and
Avignon, was a Roman colony under Augustus, and a bishopric under St.
Valentin in the third century.
A suffragan of Avignon, the papal city, the see was suppressed in 1790.
The Bishops of Carpentras, it would appear, were a romantic and
luxury-loving line of prelates, though this perhaps is aught against
their more devout virtues.
They had a magnificent palace overhanging the famous "Fountain of
Vaucluse," and repaired thither in mediæval times for the relaxation
which they evidently much appreciated. They must have been veritable
patrons of literature and the arts, as Petrarch and his fellows-in-art
were frequently of their household.
The ancient cathedral of St. Siffrein is dedicated to a former bishop of
Carpentras, who died in the sixth century.
As this church now stands, its stones are mainly of the early sixteenth
century. The west façade is entirely without character, and is pierced
at the pavement with a gross central doorway flanked by two others; poor
copies of the _Greco-Romain_ style, which, in many of its original
forms, was certainly more pleasing than here. Each of these smaller
doorways have for their jambs two beautifully toned columns of red
jasper, from a baptistère of which there are still extensive remains at
Venasque near by.
This baptistère, by the way, and its neighbouring Romanesque and Gothic
church, is quite worth the energy of making the journey countryward,
eleven kilometres from Carpentras, to see.
It is nominally of the tenth century, but is built up from fragments of
a former Temple to Venus, and its situation amid the rocks and tree-clad
hilltops of the Nesque valley is most agreeable.
The portal on the south side--though, for a fact, it hardly merits the
dignity of such a classification--is most ornately sculptured. A figure
of the Virgin, in the doorway, it locally known as Notre Dame des
Neiges.
Much iconographic symbolism is to be found in this doorway, capable of
various plausible explanations which shall not be attempted here.
It must suffice to say that nowhere in this neighbourhood, indeed
possibly not south of the Loire, is so varied and elaborate a collection
of symbolical stone-carving to be seen.
There is no regularly completed tower to St. Siffrein, but a still
unachieved tenth-century _clocher_ in embryo attaches itself on the
south.
The interior presents the general effect of Gothic, and, though of late
construction, is rather of the primitive order.
There are no aisles, but one single nave, very wide and very high, while
the apse is very narrow, with lateral chapels.
Against the western wall are placed four paintings; not worthy of
remark, perhaps, except for their great size. They are of the
seventeenth or eighteenth century. A private corridor, or gallery, leads
from this end of the church to the episcopal palace, presumably for the
sole use of the bishops and their guests. The third chapel on the right
is profusely decorated and contains a valuable painting by Dominique de
Carton. Another contains a statue of the Virgin, of the time of Louis
XIV., and is very beautiful.
A tomb of Bishop Laurent Buti (d. 1710) is set against the wall, where
the apse adjoins the nave.
Rearward on the high-altar is a fine painting by an unknown artist of
the Italian school.
The old-time cathedral of St. Siffrein was plainly not of the
poverty-stricken class, as evinced by the various accessories and
details of ornamentation mentioned above. It had, moreover, in
conjunction with it, a most magnificent and truly palatial episcopal
residence, built by a former cardinal-bishop, Alexandri Bichi, in 1640.
To-day it serves the functions of the _Palais de Justice_ and a prison;
in the latter instance certainly a fall from its hitherto high estate.
Built about by this ancient residence of the prelates of the Church is
also yet to be seen, in much if not quite all of its pristine glory, a
_Gallo-Romain arc de Triomphe_ of considerable proportions and much
beauty of outline and ornament.
As to period, Prosper Mérimée, to whom the preservation of the ancient
monuments of France is largely due, has said that it is contemporary
with its compeer at Orange (first or second century).
The Porte d'Orange, in the Grande Rue, is the only _relique_ left at
Carpentras of the ancient city ramparts built in the fourteenth century
by Pope Innocent VI.
XII
CATHÉDRALE DE VAISON
The Provençal town of Vaison, like Carpentras and Cavaillon, is really
of the basin of the Rhône, rather than of the region of the snow-crowned
Alps which form its background. It is of little interest to-day as a
cathedral city, though the see dates from a foundation of the fourth
century, by St. Aubin, until the suppression of 1790.
Its former cathedral is hardly the equal of many others which have
supported episcopal dignity, but it has a few accessories and attributes
which make it notable.
Its nave is finely vaulted, and there is an eleventh-century cloister,
which flanks the main body of the church on the left, which would be
remarked under any circumstances.
The cloister, though practically a ruin,--but a well preserved
one,--shows in its construction many beautiful Gallo-Romain and early
Gothic columns which are exceedingly beautiful in their proportions. In
this cloister, also, are some fragments of early Christian tombs, which
will offer unlimited suggestion to the archæologist, but which to the
lover of art and architecture are quite unappealing.
The _Église St. Quinin_ is a conglomerate edifice which has been built
up, in part, from a former church which stood on the same site in the
seventh century. It is by no means a great architectural achievement as
it stands to-day, but is highly interesting because of its antiquity. In
the cathedral the chief article of real artistic value is a _bénitier_,
made from the capital of a luxurious Corinthian column. One has seen
sun-dials and drinking-fountains made from pedestals and sarcophagi
before--and the effect has not been pleasing, and smacks not only of
vandalism, but of a debased ideal of art, but this column-top, which has
been transformed into a _bénitier_, cannot be despised.
The _bête-noir_ of all this region, and of Vaison in particular,--if one
is to believe local sentiment,--is the high sweeping wind, which at
certain seasons blows in a tempestuous manner. The habitant used to say
that "_le mistral, le Parlement, et Durance sont les trois fléaux de
Provence_."
[Illustration]
XIII
ST. TROPHIME D'ARLES
"In all the world that which interests me most is _La Fleur des
'Glais'_ ... It is a fine plant.... It is the same as the _Fleurs
des Lis d'Or_ of the arms of France and of Provence."
--FREDERIC MISTRAL.
[Illustration: ST. TROPHIME _d'ARLES_ ...]
Two French writers of repute have recently expressed their admiration of
the marvellous country, and the contiguous cities, lying about the mouth
of the Rhône; among which are Nîmes, Aigues-Mortes, and--of far greater
interest and charm--Arles. Their opinions, perhaps, do not differ very
greatly from those of most travellers, but both Madame Duclaux, in
"The Fields of France," and René Bazin, in his _Récits de la Plaine et
de la Montagne_, give no palm, one to the other, with respect to their
feeling for "the mysterious charm of Arles."
It is significant that in this region, from Vienne on the north to Arles
and Nîmes in the south, are found such a remarkable series of Roman
remains as to warrant the statement by a French antiquarian that "in
Rome itself are no such temples as at Vienne and Nîmes, no theatres so
splendidly preserved as that at Orange,--nor so large as that of
Arles,--and that the magnificent ruined colosseum on the Tiber in no
wise has the perfections of its compeer at Nîmes, nor has any triumphal
arch the splendid decorations of that at Reims in the champagne
country."
With these facts in view it is well to recall that many non-Christian
influences asserted themselves from time to time, and overshadowed for a
temporary period those which were more closely identified with the
growth of the Church. The Commission des Monuments Historiques catalogue
sixteen notable monuments in Arles which are cared for by them: the
Amphitheatre, the remains of the Forum,--now built into the façade of
the Hôtel du Nord,--the remains of the Palais de Constantin, the Abbey
of Montmajour, and the one-time cathedral of St. Trophime, and its
cloister--to particularize but a few.
To-day, as anciently, the ecclesiastical province is known as that of
Aix, Arles, and Embrun. Arles, however, for a time took its place as an
archbishopric, though to-day it joins hands again with Aix and Embrun;
thus, while enjoying the distinction of being ranked as an
archbishopric, its episcopal residence is at Aix.
It was at Arles that the first, and only, English pope--Adrian
Breakspeare--first entered a monastic community, after having been
refused admission to the great establishment at St. Albans in
Hertfordshire, his native place. Here, by the utmost diligence, he
acquired the foundation of that great learning which resulted in his
being so suddenly proclaimed the wearer of the tiara, in 1154.
St. Trophime came to Arles in the first century, and became the first
bishop of the diocese. The first church edifice on this site was
consecrated in 606 by St. Virgil, under the vocable of St. Etienne. In
1152 the present church was built over the remains of St. Trophime,
which were brought thither from St. Honorat des Alyscamps. So far as the
main body of the church is concerned, it was completed by the end of the
twelfth century, and only in its interior is shown the development of
the early ogival style.
The structure was added to in 1430, when the Gothic choir was extended
eastward.
The aisles are diminutively narrow, and the window piercings throughout
are exceedingly small; all of which makes for a lack of brilliancy and
gloom, which may be likened to the average crypt. The only radiance
which ever penetrates this gloomy interior comes at high noon, when the
refulgence of a Mediterranean sun glances through a series of long
lancets, and casts those purple shadows which artists love. Then, and
then only, does the cathedral of St. Trophime offer any inducement to
linger within its non-impressive walls.
The exterior view is, too, dull and gloomy--what there is of it to be
seen from the Place Royale. By far the most lively view is that obtained
from across the ruins of the magnificent Roman theatre just at the rear.
Here the time-resisting qualities of secular Roman buildings combine
with the cathedral to present a bright, sunny, and appealing picture
indeed.
St. Trophime is in no sense an unworthy architectural expression. As a
Provençal type of the Romanesque,--which it is mostly,--it must be
judged as quite apart from the Gothic which has crept in to but a slight
extent.
The western portal is very beautiful, and, with cloister, as interesting
and elaborate as one could wish.
It is the generality of an unimposing plan, a none too graceful tower
and its uninteresting interior, that qualifies the richness of its more
luxurious details.
The portal of the west façade greatly resembles another at St. Gilles,
near by. It is a profusely ornamented doorway with richly foliaged stone
carving and elaborate _bas-reliefs_.
The tympanum of the doorway contains the figure of a bishop in
sacerdotal costume, doubtless St. Trophime, flanked by winged angels and
lions. The sculptures here date perhaps from the period contemporary
with the best work at Paris and Chartres,--well on into the Middle
Ages,--when sculpture had not developed or perfected its style, but was
rather a bad copy of the antique. This will be notably apparent when the
stiffness and crudeness of the proportions of the figures are taken into
consideration.
[Illustration: _Cloisters, St. Trophime d'Arles_]
The wonderful cloister of St. Trophime is, on the east side, of
Romanesque workmanship, with barrel vaulting, and dates from 1120. On
the west it is of the transition style of a century later, while on the
north the vaulting springs boldly into the Gothic of that period--well
on toward 1400.
The capitals of the pillars of this cloistered courtyard are most
diverse, and picture in delicately carved stone such scenes of Bible
history and legend as the unbelief of St. Thomas, Ste. Marthe and the
Tarasque, etc. It is a curious _mélange_ of the vagaries of the stone
carver of the Middle Ages,--these curiously and elaborately carved
capitals,--but on the whole the _ensemble_ is one of rare beauty, in
spite of non-Christian and pagan accessories. These show at least how
far superior the classical work of that time was to the later
Renaissance.
The cemetery of Arles, locally known as Les Alyscamps, literally teems
with mediæval and ancient funeral monuments; though many, of course,
have been removed, and many have suffered the ravages of time, to say
nothing of the Revolutionary period. One portion was the old pagan
burial-ground, and another--marked off with crosses--was reserved for
Christian burial.
It must have been accounted most holy ground, as the dead were brought
thither for burial from many distant cities.
Danté mentions it in the "Inferno," Canto IX.:
"Just as at Arles where the Rhône is stagnant The sepulchres make
all the ground unequal."
Ariosto, in "Orlando Furioso," remarks it thus:
"Many sepulchres are in this land."
St. Rémy, a few leagues to the northeast of Arles, is described by all
writers as wonderfully impressive and appealing to all who come within
its spell;--though the guide-books all say that it is a place without
importance.
René Bazin has this to say: "_St. Rémy, ce n'est pas beau, ce St.
Rémy_." Madame Duclaux apostrophizes thus: "We fall at once in love with
St. Rémy." With this preponderance of modern opinion we throw in our lot
as to the charms of St. Rémy; and so it will be with most, whether with
regard to its charming environment or its historical monuments, its
arch, or its funeral memorials. One will only come away from this
charming _petite ville_ with the idea that, in spite of its five
thousand present-day inhabitants, it is something more than a modern
shrine which has been erected over a collection of ancient relics. The
little city breathes the very atmosphere of mediævalism.
[Illustration]
XIV
ST. CASTOR DE NÎMES
Like its neighbouring Roman cities, Nîmes lives mostly in the glorious
past.
In attempting to realize--if only in imagination--the civilization of a
past age, one is bound to bear always in mind the _motif_ which caused
any great art expression to take place.
Here at Nîmes the church builder had much that was magnificent to
emulate, leaving style apart from the question.
[Illustration: _St. Castor de Nîmes_]