I. 15.

Footnote 39:

Here ended the winter lectures on Roman history, April 1st 1829. Those

which follow on the history of the emperors, were delivered in the

following summer one hour every week; which accounts sufficiently for

their greater conciseness—Germ. Ed.

Footnote 40:

Goethe’s Faust, Hayward’s Translation.—TRANSL.

Footnote 41:

Basiliscus?—Germ. Ed.

Footnote 42:

This name is supplied by conjecture. N. very likely had said of the

sun and the moon: one MS. has “of Apollo and ...” (here follows an

illegible name). The emendation is correct beyond a doubt, according

to Descript. of Rome III, 1, 104.—Germ. Ed.

Footnote 43:

Posthumous Works, vol. XIII. p. 68. “The Romans, from a narrow, moral,

easy, comfortable, bourgeois state had risen to the broad range of the

dominion of the world, without losing their narrow-mindedness.—To the

same source we may trace their luxury. Underbred men who acquire a

great fortune, will always make a ridiculous use of it: their

pleasures, their pomp, their profusion, will be absurd and overdone.

Hence also arises that fondness for the Strange, the Innumerable, the

Immense. Their theatres which turn round with the spectators; the

second population of statues, with which the town was thronged, as

well as the gigantic bowl in after times, in which the large fish was

to be kept entire, are all of the same origin: even the insolence and

cruelty of their tyrants mostly partakes of the absurd.”

Footnote 44:

The so-called Marforio. See Descript. of the city of Rome, III, 1. p.

138.—Germ. Ed.

Footnote 45:

Plin. Ep. IV. 22.—Germ. Edit.

Footnote 46:

Aurel. Vict. Imp. Rom. Epit. c. 12.—Germ. Ed.

Footnote 47:

195 palms, according to Platner in Bansen’s Description of the City of

Rome, III, 1. p. 289. 10 _Palmi_ = 99 Parisian Lines.—Conf. however,

on this matter, Platner and Urlich’s Description of Rome. Stuttg. and

Tüb. 1845, pp. 24, 25.—Germ. Ed.

Footnote 48:

N. namely reads instead of _laudati essent, capitale fuisse_, laudati

capita_les_ fuis_sent_; and previously, in c. 1. instead of _at mihi

nunc_, at mihi nu_per_. See “Two classical Latin Writers of the Third

Century, P. C.” (_Kleine historische und philolog. Schriften_ I, p.

331.)—Germ. Edit.

Footnote 49:

Any one who writes High German, must feel that phrases and words are

wanting, for which the popular dialect has very apt expressions, only

they are not used in High German. This is most keenly felt by an

inhabitant of Lower Saxony, as in Upper Germany people write very

nearly as they speak.

Footnote 50:

That is, from Bonn.—Germ. Ed.

Footnote 51:

Alfieri, in one of his pieces, makes Pliny address a speech to Trajan

in which he calls upon him to restore the republic.

Footnote 52:

Three months and six days, according to Dio Cassius.—Germ. Ed.

Footnote 53:

Laurentum, according to Herodian I. 12. 1.—Germ. Ed.

Footnote 54:

In Rome there is an amulet which has not been described before, a

silver plate with magic inscriptions, having on it the silver

candlestick of Jerusalem and the usual Christian monogram. It is in

Greek, mingled with quite barbarous words in an unintelligible

language. There is written on it, that he who wore this plate, was

sure of being in favour with gods and men. This medley of

Christianity, Judaism, and paganism, is of particularly frequent

occurrence in the beginning of the third century of the Christian era.

Footnote 55:

In the dissertation “Two Classical Latin Authors of the Third Century,

P. C.” (Lesser Historical and Philological Writings, I. p. 321)—Germ.

Edit.

Footnote 56:

One of the _Scriptores Historiæ Augustæ_ (Vit. Maximin. jun. c. 7.) is

as ignorant as to make Maximus and Pupienus two different persons.

Footnote 57:

In Schmitz II, 320, this passage is given in the following version,

“if he had been a Bedouin, he could not have been enlisted in a Roman

legion, but would have remained in the cohorts of the _Ituræi_.” As my

sources already begin to be more scanty, and in the ancients

themselves very few notices are to be found, from which one might

arrive at a correct opinion, I feel particularly bound to quote here

this variation.—Germ. Ed.

Footnote 58:

Schmitz has Jotapianus, whereas my MSS., one and all, give the right

version.—Germ. Ed.

Footnote 59:

According to the _Fasti consulares_, C. Messius Quintus Trajanus

Decius.—Germ. Ed.

Footnote 60:

In some MSS., Cassianius, which form Eckhel lays down as the correct

one.—Germ. Edit.

Footnote 61:

The MSS. give Ælianus and Lælianus, both forms, as is well known,

being found of these names.—Germ. Ed.

Footnote 62:

X, 9. Niebuhr, Two Classical Writers, &c. (Lesser Histor. and Philol.

Writings, I, p. 304. sqq).—Germ. Ed.

Footnote 63:

Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 3 (of 3) · 第 50 / 53 题