Habitat, Bahia Blanca, (_September_.)

Upon comparing the skull (Pl. 34, fig. 2, _a._) of _M. elegans_ with

that of _M. Musculus_, the most evident points of distinction consist in

the greater proportionate length of the nasal and frontal bones, and the

slenderness of the zygomatic arch in the former animal. Length of skull

11 lines, width 6 lines, distance between front molar and outer side of

incisors of upper jaw 3⅜ lines, length of nasal bones 4⅜ lines.

The dentition is figured in Pl. 34, figs. 2. _b_, and 2. _c_.

“Whilst bivouacking one night on shore, amongst some sand hillocks, this

mouse, with its tail singed, leapt out of a bush which was placed on the

fire. Its hind legs appeared long in proportion to the front, and it did

not appear to be very active in endeavouring to make its escape.”—D.

_Mus elegans_ is about equal in size to _M. Musculus_; the head is

larger in proportion than in the latter, the ears are slightly larger,

the tail is longer, and so are the tarsi. The large ears, long tail, and

comparatively large size of the feet, combined with the greater size of

the animal itself, will render it easy to distinguish this species from

_M. gracilipes_ and _M. bimaculatus_. From the last mentioned animal it

moreover differs in having the head larger in proportion, the fur

longer, and the colouring of the upper parts of the body somewhat

darker. The white fur is almost confined to the under parts of the body,

and there is but a small tuft of white hairs behind the ears, whereas in

_M. bimaculatus_, the white fur extends considerably on the sides of the

body, the outer side of the limbs are white, and there is a large and

conspicuous white spot behind each ear.

In _M. elegans_ the whole sole of the tarsus and the carpal tubercles

are covered with hair. In _Mus bimaculatus_ the hinder _half_ of the

tarsus only is covered with hair, and in _M. gracilipes_ both the hinder

half is covered, and there are some scattered hairs extending almost to

the two tubercles, which are situated at the base of the longer toes.

The genus _Eligmodontia_ of M. F. Cuvier, founded upon a species of

mouse from Buenos Ayres, possesses nearly the same characters as the

subgenus _Calomys_, established by me in the Proceedings of the

Zoological Society for February 1837, and which included the animal

above described, and two other species (_M. bimaculatus_ and _M.

gracilipes_). M. Cuvier’s genus is distinguished by there being only one

large tubercle on the under side of the tarsus, and in having the carpal

pad covered with hair as well as the pad of the tarsus. In these

characters our present animal agrees, as it does also in size and in the

relative proportions of the tail and tarsus, circumstances which induce

me to believe they are identical.

In _M. bimaculatus_ and _M. gracilipes_ there are six naked tubercles on

the under side of the tarsus, and the carpal pad is also naked. In

having, however, the tarsus hairy beneath,[20] in dentition and in

colouring, they agree so closely with _M. elegans_ that I think they

cannot be separated generically.

MUS BIMACULATUS.

PLATE XII.

Mus bimaculatus, _Waterh._, Proceedings of the Zoological Society of

London for February 1837, p. 18.

_M. vellere pallidè ochraceo, pilis nigricantibus adsperso, his ad

latera rarioribus; rostri lateribus, notá magná pone aurem utramque,

artubus, corporeque subtùs niveis; auribus mediocribus; caudâ, quoad

longitudinem, corpus fere æquante; tarsis ad calcem pilis

argenteo-candidis obsitis._

DESCRIPTION.—Upper parts of the body of a very pale ochre colour, the

longer hairs, however, are black, and at the apex grayish, and

where they are numerous, as on the back and upper surface of the

head, they give greater depth to the colouring; the cheeks and

sides of the body are of an almost uniform pale, but bright

yellow; the sides of the muzzle, the lower half of the cheeks, the

lower portion also of the sides of the body, and the whole of the

under parts, are pure white—each hair being uniform in colour to

the root, and not, as is usually the case, _gray_ at the root.

There is likewise a large patch of pure white hairs behind each

ear. The feet and tail are of a pale flesh-colour, and furnished

with white hairs, with the exception of those on the upper surface

of the latter, which are pale brown. The ears are also pale

flesh-colour, clothed internally with yellow hairs; externally on

the fore part, the hairs are brownish, and on the hinder part,

white—they are rather large, and so are the feet. The tail is

about equal to the body in length. The hairs of the moustaches are

numerous and slender, and most of them are black at the base, and

gray at the apex. The hinder half of the tarsus beneath is covered

with minute silvery-white hairs; beside the ordinary tubercles,

the anterior portion of the sole of the foot and the base of the

toes beneath, are crowded with small rounded warts, which are much

more numerous and conspicuous than in the common mouse.

In. Lines.

Length from nose to root of tail 3 1

of tail 1 11

from nose to eye 0 4½

from nose to base of ear 0 8¾

of tarsus (claws included) 0 8

of ear 0 4½

The zoology of the voyage of H.M.S. Beagle [vol. 2 of 5] · 第 82 / 144 题