PATRICK HENRY.

There is no "Home of an American Statesman" that may more fitly claim

the leading place in this our repository than the dwelling of Patrick

Henry--the earliest, the most eloquent, and the wisest of those whose

high counsels first swayed us as one people and drew us to a common

cause; as resolutely as ably directed that cause to its noble event;

and, in a word, performing in the civil struggle all that Washington

executed in the military, achieved for us existence as a nation.

In the Heroic Age, however, such as was to us the Revolution, men build

not monuments nor engrave commemorative inscriptions: those of nature,

identified by rude but reverential tradition, alone attest where the

founders of a race, the great-fathers of an empire, have sprung.

If there be, among the many men of that brave day, one prompter and more

unfaltering than all the rest; if, among all who moved by stirring words

and decisive acts the general mind of the country, there was one who

more directly than any, or than all, set it in a flame not to be

extinguished; if amidst those lights there was one, the day star, till

whose coming there was no dawn, it was certainly Henry. It is true that,

before him, Massachusetts had her quarrel with England, but not with the

common sympathy of the colonies. For, averse, from her very foundation,

to not merely the dominion, but the very institutions of the mother

country, she had kept up with it a continual bickering, religious as

well as civil; a strife at best local, often ill-tempered and factious;

so that her too frequent broils, commanding little regard, would have

continued to come to nothing had not an opposition to English measures

sprung up in a more loyal quarter. The southern colonies, meanwhile, had

always loved the parent land, both church and state, and naturally had

been indulgently dealt with by its legislation. Thus, until that

ill-advised measure, the Stamp Act, came, to affect all the American

plantations alike, there had been nothing to draw us together in a

common cause, a common resistance. The Stamp Act gave that cause, and

Henry led that resistance. Young, obscure, unconnected, unaided,

uncounselled, and even uncountenanced, he yet, by the sudden splendor of

his eloquence, his abilities, and his dauntless resolution, carried

every thing before him; animated the whole land to a determined

assertion of their rights; established for himself a boundless influence

over the popular mind; used it, whenever the occasion came, to sound the

signal of an unshrinking opposition to every encroachment; led the way,

independently of all movements elsewhere; devised and brought about

every main measure of preparation; rejected all compromise; clearly the

first to see the certain issue of the contest in European interposition

and the establishment of our Independence, pursued steadily that aim

before even he could openly avow it: and finally, when things were ripe;

assumed it for his State, instructed her deputation to propose it to all

the rest, and indeed, involved them in it beyond avoidance, by setting

up a regular and permanent Republican Constitution in Virginia; a step

that allowed no retreat, and was not less decisive than the heroical act

of Cortez, when, marching upon Mexico from his landing-place, he burnt

his vessels behind him. Henry was, in a word, the Moses who led us forth

from the house of bondage. If there had been an opposition before his,

it was not the appointed, and would have been an ineffectual one. There

had, no doubt, been Jews enough that murmured, even before he who was to

deliver them appeared. We may, therefore, fitly apply to Henry, in

regard to the bringing about of our Independence, all that Dryden so

finely said of Bacon in science:

"Bacon, like Moses, led us forth, at last:

The barren wilderness he passed;

Did on the very border stand

Of the blest promised land;

And from the mountain-top of his exalted wit,

Saw it himself and showed us it."

And yet Henry, like nearly all his illustrious fellow-laborers of

freedom, sleeps in an undistinguished grave. At his death, party spirit

denied to his memory the tokens of public admiration and regret, offered

in that very legislature of which he had been the great light, and

which, indeed, he had called into being. Since that sorry failure--for

all faction should have been hushed over the body of a citizen and a man

so admirable--no further notice has been taken of him; and he who

merited a national monument, only less proud than that due to Washington

himself, slumbers beneath an humble private one at Red Hill, the

secluded residence where he died.

But we turn to those personal particulars of this extraordinary man

which are appropriate to the design of the present volume. Not a few of

them will be found to involve important corrections of the received

account of his early years, and a new view, therefore, of his genius and

character.

In that received account, his sole original biographer, Mr.

Wirt--writing without any personal knowledge of him, and neglecting to

consult the most obvious and authentic source of information, his four

surviving sisters, ladies of condition and of remarkable

intelligence--has fallen into the vulgar error, to which the peculiar

position and fortunes of Mr. Henry at first gave rise, and which he

afterwards, for warrantable political purposes, encouraged. When he

suddenly burst out from complete obscurity, an unrivalled orator, a

consummate politician, and snatched the control of legislation and of

the public mind from the veteran, the college-bred, the wealthy and

high-born leaders who had till then held it, the homeliness of dress

which befitted his narrow circumstances, the humility of aspect and the

simplicity of manners, which were unaffected traits of his disposition,

naturally assigned him in the eyes of both those who were of it and of

those who looked down upon it, to the plebeian class. It suited the envy

of these, it delighted the admiration of those, to regard him--that

unintelligible marvel of abilities, which had thus all at once effaced

every thing else--as a mere child of the people. The really skilful, who

understand intellectual prodigies and never refer them to ignorance or

chance, must have seen at once, through the cloud in which he stood, a

great and an enlightened understanding, too competent to a high and a

complex public question, not to be strong in knowledge as well as

faculties. The few cannot have mistaken him for that fabulous thing, an

ignorant genius; for they must have seen in his commanding and complete

eloquence the art, in his masterly measures the information, of one

thoroughly trained, though in secret, to the business of swaying men's

minds, and of conducting their counsels, though hitherto apart from

them. All but this highest class, however, of the rivals whom he at once

threw into eclipse naturally sought to depreciate him as a mere

declaimer, a tribunitian orator, voluble and vehement as he was rude,

rash, and illiterate. Could the tapers that, at Belshazzar's feast, went

out before the blaze of that marvellous handwriting on the wall, have

been afterwards permitted to give their opinion of it, they would, of

course, have talked disdainfully of its beam, as mere phosphorus or some

other low pyrotechnic trick. Such was the reputation which the

vanquished magnates in general, and their followers, endeavored to fix

upon the young subverter of their ascendency. He was not of one of the

old aristocratic families; he was a low person, therefore he had never

been within the walls of a college, still less had he, like many of

them, finished, with the graces of foreign travel, a public discipline

of learning; he was, therefore, by their report, illiterate, although,

certainly, in his performances, all the best effects of education were

manifest, without its parade. While they called him ignorant, he always

proved himself to know whatever the occasion demanded, and able

victoriously to instruct foe and friend. Shunning, from his sense, all

assumption, and from his modesty, all display, he never pulled out the

purse of his acquirements to chink it merely, but only to pay; so that

no man could tell what he had left in the bottom of his pocket; and

thus, a ragged-looking Fortunatus, he always surprised men with his

unguessed resources. Strange powers, undoubtedly, he had, that must have

not a little confounded the judgment of the best observers; unexercised

in the forum, he had risen up a consummate master of the whole art of

moving in discourse the understanding or the passions; unpractised in

public affairs, he had only to appear in them, in order to stand the

first politician of his day; unversed in the business and the strategy

of deliberative assemblies, he had only to become a member of one, in

order to be its adroitest parliamentary tactician. As he was dexterous

without practice, so was he prudent without experience; for, from the

first he shone out as the wisest man in all the public councils. He

seems to have escaped all that tribute of error which youth must almost

invariably pay, as the price of eminence in public affairs; he fell into

no theory, he indulged no vision, he never once committed a blunder; in

short, ripe from the beginning, he appeared to be by instinct and the

mere gift of nature, whatever others slowly become only by the aid of

art and experience. Bred up in seclusion, though (as the high

cultivation of his sisters testified to all who knew them) in a

household whose very atmosphere was knowledge, he had, beyond a good

acquaintance with Latin, the rudiments of Greek, French, mathematics,

and an early familiarity with the best English authors--those of the

Elizabethan age, of the Commonwealth, and of Queen Anne's day-received

little direct instruction; none, but from his father and books, his

early companions, so that his scholastic instruction was really slender.

But he had been taught, betimes, to love knowledge and how to work it

out for himself; how, in a word, to accomplish what best unfolds a great

genius, self-education. For schools and colleges--admirable contrivances

as they are for keeping up among mankind a common method and a common

stock of information--are but suited, as they were but designed, for the

common run of men. Applying to all the same mechanical process; bringing

to the same level the genius and the dunce, they act excellently to

repair the original inequality, sometimes so vast, with which nature

deals out understanding among the human race. In a word, they are

capital machines for bringing about an average of talent; but it is at

the expense of those bright parts which occasionally come, that they do

it. Their methods clap in the same couples him who can but creep and him

who would soar; harness in the same cart the plough-horse and the

courser. The highest genius must be its own sole method-maker, its own

entire rule. From what it has done, rules are deduced; but for its

inferiors, not for it: its whole existence is exceptional, original; and

whatever, in its disciplining, would tend to make it otherwise, serves

but to check and to diminish its development.

No greater error, therefore, than to suppose that a man as extraordinary

as Patrick Henry, who, mature from the first, rose up a consummate

speaker and reasoner, and, amongst men of large abilities, knowledge,

and experience, constantly showed himself, in matters the weightiest and

the most difficult, superior to them all, could have been uneducated. In

reality he had learned of the best possible master, for such a

man--himself. That he knew, that he even knew more solidly, because more

effectually and to the purpose, than all those around him, the great

subjects with which he dealt so wonderfully, is beyond all question.

Now, though the genius of Mr. Henry was prodigious, and though there be

things which genius does, as it were, intuitively and spontaneously,

there are other things which are not knowable, even by genius itself,

without study; which the utmost genius cannot extemporize, cannot

produce from nothing, cannot make without their materials previously

amassed in its mind, cannot understand without their necessary

particulars accumulated in advance; and it was in just such things--the

highest civil ability, which comes of wisdom, not genius; the greatest

eloquence which cannot be formed but by infinite art and labor--that he

stood up at all times supreme. The sagacity of statesmanship with which

he looked through the untried affairs of this country, saw through

systems and foretold consequences, has never been surpassed; and his

eloquence, judged (as we have alone the means of judging it) by its

effects, has never been equalled.

Such then, even upon the traditionary facts out of which his biographer

has shaped into a mere fable his sudden rise and his anomalous

abilities, is, of necessity, the rational theory of Mr. Henry's

greatness. But, without any resort to induction, the simple truth, if

Mr. Wirt had sought it in the natural quarter, would have conducted him

to the same conclusions as we have just set forth.

At the time when Mr. Wirt collected his materials, he was yet, though of

fine natural abilities, by no means the solid man that he by and by

became. His fancy was exuberant, his taste florid, his judgment

unformed. Himself in high repute for a youthful and gaudy eloquence,

which, however, he afterwards exchanged for a style of great severity

and vigor--he had been urged to his immature and ambitious undertaking,

by admirers who conceived him to be little less than a second Henry. His

besetting idea seems to be much akin to Dr. Johnson's "who drives fat

oxen should himself be fat:" namely that the life of a great orator

should be written by a great orator; and that he was to show not only

Mr. Henry but himself eloquent. In general his book does him credit, as

merely a literary performance, although sadly deformed, in what were

intended for its best passages, by an inflation of which he must have

been afterwards greatly ashamed, as a sin against all style, but

especially that proper to his subject--the historic. Let us add--in

simple justice to a man of great virtues and elevation, as well as

gentleness of mind and feelings, whose memory has upon us, besides, the

claim of public respect and of hereditary friendship--that his

biography, wherever his own, is, in spite of party spirit, written with

the most honorable candor, and vindicates Mr. Henry with equal fairness

and ability from the aspersions cast upon his conduct in the "Alien and

Sedition" business by the Jeffersonian faction. Wherever he (Mr. Wirt)

has depended upon his own researches alone, he displays both diligence

and discrimination; but unhappily, he accepted the loose popular

traditions, which are never any thing but a tissue of old women's tales;

he relied upon a mass of casual contributions, chiefly derived from the

same legendary sources or from uncertain, confused, and (as himself lets

us see) often contradictory memories; and above all, he adopted

implicitly the information supplied by a certain Thomas Jefferson; who,

besides being a person of whom the sagacious and upright Henry cherished

a very ill opinion--so that _he_ could not well be supposed a very

special repository of the orator's personal confidences--was a gentleman

who had all his life driven rather the largest and most lucrative trade

in the calumny of nearly all the best and greatest of his

contemporaries, that has ever been carried on in these United States,

much as that sort of commerce has long flourished and yet flourishes

amongst us. Upon such things he had come to a splendid political fortune

while he lived, and when he died, with a pious solicitude to provide for

his posterity, he bequeathed to his grandson all the unspent capital

stock of his slanders (his Memoirs and Ana) to carry on the old business

with and keep up the greatness of the family.

The effect of all this was to turn what before was strange or obscure,

in Henry's history, into little better than a fable, a sort of popular

and poetic myth of eloquence, in which the great speaker and statesman

fades away into a fiction, a mere creation of the fancy, scarcely more

real or probable than the account in old Master Tooke's "Pantheon," of

Orpheus's drawing the rocks and trees and the very wild beasts along

with him by his powers of song. Nay, in one main point, Master Tooke's

legend more consults verisimilitude: for _he_, instead of shocking all

probability by representing his hero to have been without education,

sends him as private pupil to the Muses themselves, who are reputed to

have kept, then as now, the best Greek and Latin colleges a-going.

It is certainly true, in excuse for all this, that the mighty men who,

for their exploits and services, became the demigods of fable, "the fair

humanities of old religion," had scarcely more struck the excited

imagination of their times than had Henry. Like theirs was the obscurity

of his birth, the mystery of his education, the marvel of his

achievements. Of his many great speeches, scarcely one uncorrupted

passage can be said to survive; so that even of that which all felt and

know we have but the faintest shadow. A fragmentary thought is all of

genuine that is left us out of a whole immortal harangue; some powerful

ejaculation stands for an entire oration, and dimly suggests, not

explains its astonishing effects. To all purpose historic of his

eloquence, he might just as well have lived before alphabetic writing

was invented. At best, the oratory that entrances, agitates, enraptures,

transports every man in a whole assembly, and hurries him totally away,

thrilling and frenzied with sensations as vehement as novel, sets all

reporting, all stenography at defiance. Before it, shorthand--at most,

the dim reflection of such things; a cold copy, a poor parody where it

is not a burlesque of speech in its great bursts--drops its pen, and

forgets even to translate; which, after all (_haud inexpertus loquor_),

is the utmost it can do. But of not even such translation did Mr. Henry,

upon any occasion but two,[11] receive the advantage such as it is.

Every where in these the single but skilful reporter confesses, by many

a summary in parenthesis, that at certain passages he lost himself in

the speaker, and could not even attempt to render him. Thus it comes

that, of his transcendent harangues--those which made or directed the

Revolution--we have only a few scattered sentences, and the seemingly

amazed descriptions which attest their extraordinary effects. There is

but one exception: a version, to appearance tolerably entire, though

still evidently but a sketch, of his "Liberty or Death" speech, when, on

the 20th March, 1775, he told the Convention of Virginia, assembled in

the "Old Church" at Richmond (St. Johns), that "they must fight," and

moved to arm and organize the militia. This, even in its existing form,

is a prodigiously noble speech, full of vigor in the argument, full of

passion in the appeals, breathing every where the utmost fire of the

warrior, orator, patriot, and sage. Fitly uttered, it is still--though of

course it must have lost greatly in the transmission--a discourse to

rouse a whole nation invincibly to arms, if their cause and their

courage were worthy of it. That speech evidently, and that speech alone,

is, in the main, the true thunder of Henry: all the others are but the

mustard-bowl.

[Illustration: Old Church Richmond, Va.]

But though from all these causes, he already, in Mr. Wirt's day, stood,

as seen through the fast-gathered haze of tradition, a huge but shadowy

figure, it was the business of the biographer, instead of merely showing

him to us in that popular light, to set him in a true one. The critical

historian clears up such mists, defines such shadows, and calls them

back not only to substance but proportion, color, life, the very

pressure and body of the times. What if the historic truth had passed

into a poetic fable? Mr. Wirt should have dealt with it, not as a bard,

a rhapsodist, but a philosophical mythologist, who from fable itself

sifts out the unwritten facts of a day, when fable was the only form of

history.

Besides, however, adopting for the fundamental facts of Mr. Henry's

character all these false sources, his biographer utterly neglected (as

we have already intimated) the most obvious and the most natural ones.

He had then four surviving sisters, women not merely of condition but

intellectually remarkable.

To none of these did Mr. Wirt resort for any domestic particulars of his

early life, which of course none knew so well as they. Well acquainted

with them all--sprung from one of them--we have cause to know the

astonishment with which they met this written account of his early years

and his breeding up. Had Mr. Wirt personally known these highly

cultivated and very superior ladies, distinguished as they were for the

completeness and solidity of their old-fashioned education, he must have

seen at once that his own story of Henry's youthful institution and ways

is about as true as it is that Achilles was born of a sea-goddess, had a

centaur for his private tutor, and was fed upon lion's marrow to make

him valiant.

His very lineage was literary. His father, John Henry, a Scottish

gentleman of Aberdeen, was a man of good birth, of learned education,

and, when he migrated to Virginia, of easy fortune. He was the nephew of

Robertson, the great historian of his own country and of ours. The name

of his mother, Jane Robertson, an admirable and accomplished person, is

still preserved and transmitted among her female descendants. His

cousin, David Henry, was the associate editor of the "Gentleman's

Magazine," then a leading publication, with Edward Cave, the last of the

learned printers; whose brother-in-law and successor he became. The

family bred many of its members for the church, which in Britain implies

such influence as secures preferment. John's younger brother, Patrick,

thus taking orders, received a rectorship near him, and followed him to

this country. In those days of Episcopacy, benefices drew after them not

merely comfortable reverence, but goodly emolument and even authority in

civil life; so that the parsons were a power in the State. All this

Patrick, a man worthy of it, employed. His brother already possessed it;

and thus both took their station among the gentry, though not the

aristocracy, of the land--its untitled nobility: for, in effect, such an

order, sustained by primogeniture and entails, then existed throughout

lower or tide-water Virginia.

John attained to the command of the regiment of his county, to its

surveyorship, and to the presiding chair of its magistracy; stations

then never conferred but upon leading men in the community. More

careless, however, of his private interests than of the public, without

exactly wasting his fortune, he gradually frittered it away; and though

he repaired it for a time, by an advantageous marriage with the young

and wealthy widow (a Winston by birth) of his most intimate friend, Col.

John Syme, of the Rocky Mills, yet before the tenth year of Patrick, his

second son (born 29th May, 1736), he found himself so straitened as to

have need to make himself an income by setting up in his house a private

classical school. Assisted to this by the reputation of being one of the

best scholars in the country, he taught for a number of years with great

approval the children of his friends and his own; abandoning the pursuit

only when one of its inducements--the education of his own sons and

daughters (two of the former and five of the latter)--had ceased.

Under such circumstances, and especially when we repeat that those four

of his daughters whom we knew were persons greatly admired for the

masculine goodness and extent of their education, it may be judged how

likely, how possible it is that Patrick, with his boundless

aptitude--always, in after life, applied most rapidly and successfully

to whatever he had need to understand--can have grown up to manhood

almost uninstructed, ignorant, and idle. Genius, of which it is the very

essence that it has an uncontrollable affinity for the knowledge proper

to its caste, has often been seen to surmount obstacles seemingly

invincible to its information; never yet wilfully, incorrigibly, and in

spite of every influence around, to shut out the open and easy daylight

of intelligence, and darken itself into voluntary duncedom. The thing,

we repeat is a flat, a bald and a flagrant impossibility. You might as

well tell us that a young eagle, instead of taking to the sky as soon as

its pinions were grown, has, though neither caged nor clipped, remained

contented on foot and preferred to run about the barn-yard with the

dunghill fowls. No! your "mute Miltons" and your harmless Cromwells

sound very prettily to the fancy, but in plain fact, were no Miltons

unless they sang, no Cromwells unless they conquered. Genius and

Heroism--the most strenuous of human things--were never dull, slothful,

idle; never slighted opportunity, but always make, if they do not find

it.

Accordingly, the sisters of Mr. Henry always asserted that, whatever

their brother might appear abroad, he was a close voluntary student at

home; exploring not only his father's library, which was large and good,

but whatever other books he could lay his hands upon; dwelling, with an

especial delight, upon certain great authors, of whom he seemed to make

his masters; but cultivating assiduously what was then called "polite

learning," and merited the name, along with history at large, and that

of the free states of antiquity, and of England in particular. His great

favorites were Livy and Virgil; not (as Mr. Wirt supposes of the former)

in a translation, but the original. That the sisters were right on this

point is sufficiently proved by the fact that, a few years ago, his

Latin Virgil was in existence, its margins all filled with his

manuscript notes. We need hardly say that he who was not content with

Dryden as a translator was clearly not a-going to take up with poor old

Philemon Holland, then the current English disfigurer of the most

animated and picturesque of historians. Henry's sisters indeed, and the

only one of his schoolfellows that we have ever met, were persuaded that

he read Latin almost as readily as English. Mr. Wirt himself had learned

that the great Paduan was ever in his boyish hands; now, that single

point established, he might without hesitation have proceeded to five

clear and important inferences: first, that no boy has a favorite book

but because he is fond of books generally; secondly, that when his

favorite is, though of the highest merit, a very unusual one, he must

not only have read much, but with great discrimination: thirdly, that if

his favorite was in a special class (not a mere miscellanist) he was

well read in that class, addicted to it: fourthly, that he was enamored

of such a favorite for his matchless merits, both of matter and of

style; his sensibility to the former of which particulars implied

information, to the latter a well-formed taste: fifthly, that no mere

translation of Livy--especially not flat, tame old Holland--nothing short

of the golden original, could have inspired such a Livian affection. But

this is not all; when--coming to be put into the possession of the

scanty remaining body of Mr. Henry's papers (ill-preserved by his not

very wise progeny) and invited to write his life more authentically--we

ourselves began first to study his speeches and his mind critically, it

did not take us long to perceive, what is indeed easily seen, that Mr.

Henry's early passion for Livy--born of course of Livy's conformity to

his genius--had deeply tinged the peculiar style of his eloquence, the

peculiar character of his politics, was, in sooth, the immediate source

of both; that the harangues in Livy had been his models of discourse;

that the sentiments of public magnanimity, which Livy every where, and

we may say Livy alone breathes, were transfused into Henry's spirit, and

gave to his ideas of a state that singular grandeur, that loftiness,

that heroism, which fills and informs them. His love of freedom

even--his republicanism--was such as Livy's; popular, yet patrician: not

your levelled liberty, too low to last, which, to keep down the

naturally great, sets up the base on high; but a freedom consistent with

the eminence and the subordination of natural orders mutually dependent;

equal under the law, but distinct in their power to serve the state, as

bringing to its aid, this rank higher counsels and obligations, that,

force and numbers; in short, not merely a tumultuary, a mob liberty, but

a social and a regulated concert of all classes, the absolute

predominance of none; a republican, not a democratic aim. Less learned

than Milton, certainly, but of a highly kindred spirit, he was very like

him in his general political system; but was more practical, better

acquainted with men. The one had more of the poetical element in him,

the other more of the political. Both were deeply religious; without

which no man can be a safe politician. Each towered above all the men of

his day, except one, a warrior; and nearly such relation as Milton held

to Cromwell did Henry hold to Washington. Alike in the antique cast of

their minds, they were yet alike in being, withal, thoroughly English in

their notion of actual freedom: for Henry's mind was just as little

touched with any of the Jeffersonian fancies of Frenchified liberty as

Milton's own. Both were of the historic, not the so-called philosophic

school of politics: for history was evidently the only treatise on

government that either thought worthy of any attention. If they had ever

stooped to the systematic writers, from the great sources (wise

histories) out of which those writers can at most draw, it can only have

been to despise nearly every mother's son of them. Finally, alike in so

many things, they were not unlike in their fate: both "fell upon evil

times," and lost their public credit in the land of which they had

matchlessly vindicated the public cause: Milton died sightless, and

Henry too blind for the light of the Virginia abstractions.

Every thing confutes the vulgar theory of his greatness. Had he been

ignorant at his first rise, the growth of his talent, as well as of his

knowledge, would have been traceable in his performances; but on the

contrary, he burst out, from the first, mature and finished. By the

universal consent, his very earliest speeches were quite equal to any

thing he ever after pronounced. Had these been at sixteen, it would go

far to prove that his eloquence, his ability, and even his information

came (as such things never came in any other instance) without

cultivation: but his first speech, that in "the parson's cause," at

Hanover Court House, in 1763, when he was twenty-nine years old; the

same period of life at which Demosthenes and Cicero shone out; a period

after which there may be large additions to artificial knowledge, but

can seldom be any to the natural splendor of the faculties.

We have known many who knew Mr. Henry, in the entire unreserve of that

domestic life, in which he so much loved to unbend himself. All such

agreed that he was a man of very great and very various information. He

read every thing. At home, his interval between an early dinner and

supper-time (after which he gave himself up to conversation with his

friends, or to sport with his children, or to music on the violin and

flute, which he played) was always consecrated to study: he withdrew

from company to his office and books. His very manner of reading was

such as few attain, and marks the great and skilful dealer with other

men's thoughts: he seldom read a book regularly on; but seemed only to

glance his eye down the pages, and, as it were, to gallop athwart the

volume; and yet, when he had thus strid through it, knew better than any

body else all that was worth knowing in it contents. A learned physician

who dwelt near him, told us, in speaking of this wide range of his

knowledge, that he had, for instance, to his surprise, found him to be a

good chemist, at a time when an acquaintance with that science was

almost confined to medical men. Except in private, however, he kept the

secret of his own attainments, content to let them appear only in their

effects. This was, originally, out of his singular modesty; but by and

by when his vanquished rivals of college-breeding sought to depreciate

him as low-born and uneducated, he from policy conformed to imputations

which heightened the wonder of his performances and therefore added to

his success.

Let us add one more fact, substantive and significant. The range of a

man's mind, the very particulars of his studies may usually, when he is

not a mere book-collector or other affector of letters, be pretty

definitely ascertained from the contents of his library. In that view,

finding that a list of Mr. Henry's was embraced in the records of the

Court of Probate of his county, we examined and copied it. For that day,

his library, besides its merely professional contents, is quite a large

one--some five hundred volumes, mostly good and solid. We found it to

contain the usual series of Greek school-books, probably all he had ever

read; for the language was then slightly learnt in Virginia: a good many

of the Latin authors, and various French ones. The last language we

know, from other sources, that he understood. Now, he was the man in the

world the least likely to have got or to keep books that he did not

comprehend.

Such was the enigma of Patrick Henry's mind; and such is its clear

solution: a solution which, at least, must be confessed to substitute

the rational for the irrational, the possible for the impossible, the

positive of domestic evidence for the negative of popular tradition.

Apart, however, from such testimony, there were other proofs that should

have suggested themselves to the anatomist of life character, the

physiologist of his genius. When we ourselves first began minutely to

consider his speeches, their effects, all that is told of the manner in

which those effects were brought about, the reach and the diversity of

his powers, their admirable adaptation to all occasions and to all

audiences--for he swayed all men alike by his eloquence, the low and the

high, the ignorant and the learned; the unapproached dramatic perfection

of his voice, gesture, manner, and whole delivery; his mastery, not only

in speech, but off the tribune and man to man, of all that can affect

either men's reason or their imagination, we could not, for our lives,

help coming to the conclusion that all this must be skill, not chance;

and that instead of being the mere child of nature, he was the most

consummate artist that ever lived. Nature bestows marvellous things, but

these are not within even her gift. She gives the gold, but she does not

work it into every beautiful form; she gives the diamond, but she does

not cut it; she bestows the marble, but did not carve the Olympian Jove

nor the Belvidere Apollo. In fine, we had, in much acquaintance with men

the ornaments of the public life of our times, been accustomed to

understand all the minute mechanism of civil abilities; and when we came

to examine closely this matchless piece of machinery, we could not avoid

believing, in spite of all assertions to the contrary, that each

particular part, however nice and small, must have been made by hand and

most painfully put together. And thus, perceiving every thing else in

this prodigious speaker to have been so masterly, we became convinced

that his style, his diction must have been, in the main, as excellent as

every thing else about him. It could not have been otherwise. He whose

thought was so high and pure, whose fancy was so rich, and the mere

outward auxiliaries of whose discourse (voice, and action) had been so

laboriously perfected, can, by no possibility, have failed to make

himself equally the master of expression. What we have as his, is mere

reporter's English; and no man is to be judged by that slop of sentences

into which he is put and melted away by their process. In that menstruum

of words, all substances are alike. It is the true universal solvent, so

long sought, that acts upon every thing and turns it into liquid babble.

Mr Henry knew and often practised, not only upon the multitude but the

refined; the power of a homely dialect, and saw how wise or brave or

moving things may be made to come with a strangely redoubled effect, in

the extremest plainness of rustic speech. His occasional resort to this,

however, of course struck much upon the common attention and got him the

reputation, among other foolish reputations, of habitually using such

locutions; when, in reality, he was master of all modes of discourse

alike, and only employed always that which best suited his purpose.

There is yet one more false notion, in regard to him, which Mr. Wirt has

done much to propagate: the notion, we mean, that Henry never

condescended to be less than the great orator; that, instead of

sometimes going about his business on foot, like other lawyers and

legislators, he rode for ever in a sort of triumphal car of eloquence,

dragging along a captive crowd at his conquering wheels; and, in short,

that

"He could not ope

His mouth, but out there flew a trope."

On the contrary, no man was ever less the oration-maker. He never used

his eloquence but as he used every thing else--just when it was wanted.

In the mass of public business, eloquence is out of place, and could not

be attended to. A man who was always eloquent would soon lose all

authority in a public body. Mr. Henry kept up always the very greatest,

and merited it, by taking a leading part in all important matters and

making more and better business speeches than any body else.

A long preliminary this; but we trust not uninteresting. It was, at any

event, necessary that we should first, in the Bentonian phrase,

"vindicate the truth of history," and set a great character in its

proper public light, before passing to those humble particulars of

private life to which we now proceed.

In person, he was tall and rather spare, but of limbs round enough for

either vigor or grace. He had, however, a slight stoop, such as very

thoughtful people are apt to contract. In public, his aspect was

remarkable for quiet gravity. It seems to have been a rule with him

never to laugh and hardly to smile, before the vulgar. In their presence

he wore an air always fit to excite at once their sympathy and their

reverence; modest, even to humility; and yet most imposing. In all this

he played no assumed, though he could not have played a more skilful

part: for the occasion and the presence appear always to have so duly

and so strongly affected him, as at once to transform him into what was,

at each instant, fittest. Thus his art, of which we have already spoken,

might well be consummate; for he was all that, for mere purposes of

effect, he should have seemed to be, the very impersonation of the cause

and the feelings proper to the hour. Great wisdom, indeed, an

unshrinking courage, and yet an equal prudence, a patriotism the most

fervent, a profound sensibility, a rare love of justice, yet a spirit of

the greatest gentleness and humanity, and in a word, the highest

virtues, public and private, crowned with a disinterestedness, an

absence of all ambition most singular in a democracy (which above all

things breeds the contrary) made him--if Cicero be right--the greatest

of orators, because the most virtuous of men that ever possessed that

natural gift. No man ever knew men better, singly or in the mass; none

ever better knew how to sway them; but none ever less abused that power,

for he seems ever to have felt, in a religious force, the solemnity of

all those public functions, which so few now regard. It was probably the

weight of this feeling, along with his singular modesty, that made him

shun official honors as earnestly as others seek them. It is evident

that no power, nor dignity, nor even fame could dazzle him. It was only

at the public command that he accepted trusts from his State; and he

always laid them down as soon as duty permitted. All offers of Federal

dignities,[12] up to the highest, he rejected. He had served his State

only in perilous times, when (as the Devil says in Milton) to be highest

was only to be exposed foremost to the bolts of the dreaded enemy; or at

some conjuncture of civil danger; but when peace and ease had come and

ambition was the only lure to office, he would not have it.

If, however, he was thus grave, on what he considered the solemn stage

of public life, he made himself ample amends in all that can give

cheerfulness to the calm of retirement in the country. When at last

permitted to attend to his private fortune, he speedily secured an ample

one. It was enjoyed, whenever business allowed him to be at home, in a

profuse and general, but solid and old-fashioned hospitality, of which

the stout and semi-baronial supplies were abundantly drawn from his own

large and well-managed domain. His house was usually filled with

friends, its dependencies with their retinue and horses. But crowds,

besides, came and went; all were received and entertained with

cordiality. The country all about thronged to see the beloved and

venerated man, as soon as it went abroad that he was come back. Some

came merely to see him; the rest to get his advice on law and all other

matters. To the poor, it was gratuitous; to even the rich without a fee,

except where he thought the case made it necessary to go to law. All

took his counsel as if it had been an oracle's, for nobody thought there

was any measure to "Old Patrick's" sense, integrity, or good nature.

This concourse began rather betimes, for those who lived near often came

to breakfast, where all were welcomed and made full. The larder seemed

never to get lean. Breakfast over, creature-comforts, such as might

console the belated for its loss, were presently set forth on

side-tables in the wide entrance hall. Of these--the solid, not the

liquid parts of a rural morning's meal--breakfast without its slops, and

such as, if need were, might well stand for a dinner, all further comers

helped themselves as the day or their appetites advanced. Meanwhile, the

master saw and welcomed all with the kindliest attention, asked of their

household, listened to their affairs, gave them his view, contented all.

These audiences seldom ceased before noon or the early dinner. To this a

remaining party of from twenty to thirty often sat down. It was always,

according to the wont of such houses in that well-fed land, a meal

beneath which the tables groaned, and whose massive old Saxon dishes

would have made a Frenchman sweat. Every thing is excellent at these

lavish feasts; but they have no luxuries save such as are home-grown.

They are, however, for all that is substantial and plain, the very

summit of good cheer. At Governor Henry's, they never failed to be,

besides, seasoned with his conversation, which at table always grew gay

and even gamesome. The dinner ended, he betook himself, as already told,

to his studies until supper, after which he again gave himself up to

enjoyment. In this manner came, with the kindliest and most cheerful

approach, the close of his days; upon which there rested not a stain nor

(such had been through life his personal benignity) a hostility. Except

tyrants and other public enemies, he had lived at peace with man and

God, achieving most surprising and illustrious things, and content, save

the sight of his liberated country, with little reward beyond that which

he bore in his own approving bosom.

[Illustration: Old Court House, Va.]

Homes of American Statesmen; With Anecdotical, Personal, and Descriptive Sketches · 第 16 / 40 题