Müller's case[74] is that of a woman thirty-four years of age who at

the age of four fell out of bed, and from that time began to walk with

difficulty, and ultimately acquired a double talipes equinus. The right

leg atrophied, the left remained of tolerable thickness. At the age of

thirty-four she was admitted to an insane asylum during the incipient

stage of dementia paralytica, and death occurred two years later of

pneumonia. The autopsy showed--1st. That the calf-muscles on both sides

were converted into masses of fat, streaked with whitish-red remnants

of muscular tissue. The short muscles of the feet were atrophied; all

the other muscles of the body normal. 2d. In the brain the

blood-vessels showed a thickening of the adventitia by delicate

connective-tissue fibrillæ, between whose meshes nucleated cells were

strewed. The ependyma of the ventricles was thickened and granular, and

their cavity was filled with serous effusion. 3d. In the cord was found

diffused degeneration, especially of the lateral columns, consisting in

thickening of the interstitial connective tissue, with proliferation of

its cells; atrophy of a part of the primitive nerve-fibres with

granular degeneration of the {573} medullary sheath, and occasionally

atrophy of the axis cylinder. The adventitia of the blood-vessels was

thickened, the perivascular spaces dilated. In the central gray

substance the ganglion-cells were everywhere intact, but the

intercellular substance was thicker, and seemingly composed of a thick

net of stout, finely-granular fibres. Traces of an infantile

polio-myelitis were found in the lower part of the lumbar enlargement

(atrophy of the anterior cornua, especially the right, together with

their ganglion-cells).

[Footnote 74: _Beiträge zur pathol. des Ruckenmarkes_, 1871.]

The final lesion of importance was the obliteration of the central

canal, which was moreover surrounded by a dense ring of connective

tissue. In this case the suddenness of the original paresis, the

atrophy of the right leg, and the lesions of the lumbar cord found at

the autopsy prove that the initial disease was an acute anterior

polio-myelitis. Upon this a very localized pseudo-hypertrophy seems to

have been grafted during childhood, while in adult life a chronic

lepto-meningitis and internal hydrocephalus were certainly the cause of

the symptoms, and probably of the lesions in the cord.

That such lesions in the cord may be the consequence of chronic

hydrocephalus is well argued by Pekelharing in regard to his own

recently published case, which in some respects closely resembles that

by Müller. The patient was a boy in whom muscular paresis was

congenital, and who from birth had exhibited deficient intelligence

with an abnormally large head. At the autopsy, made at fourteen,

ventricular effusion was found in the brain, and in the cord irregular

dilatation of the central canal and great dilatation of blood-vessels

and accumulation of leucocytes in its immediate neighborhood. Some

ganglion-cells in the inner and anterior groups of the anterior cornua

were shrunken and deprived of their prolongations. The author suggests

that in this case the cerebral hydrocephalus was the primary disease;

that the central canal in the spinal cord was dilated by extension of

the effusion from the brain; that a partial reabsorption of such

effusion had caused hyperæmia ex vacuo in the tissue immediately

surrounding the canal; and that the emigration of leucocytes and

partial alteration of the ganglion-cells both resulted from this

hyperæmia.

In Müller's case the central canal and adjacent tissue were also the

part of the cord most diseased; but the canal was obliterated by

proliferation of the ependyma, not dilated. In Barth's case also[75]

the central canal of the cord was found obliterated. The patient was a

man of forty-four, who since the age of forty had suffered from

stiffness in the left ankle and difficulty of walking. After a year the

stiffness extended to the right ankle; in two years the paresis had

mounted to the thighs, and was accompanied by severe pains. Paresis and

pain then appeared in the upper extremities, which gradually atrophied.

After two years the patient was entirely confined to bed, and two years

later was unable even to sit up. Later, the muscles of the neck became

hypertrophied. No mention is made of perceptible hypertrophy in other

muscles, nor of contractions or tremors other than fibrillary. But at

the autopsy was discovered a lateral sclerosis extending the entire

length of the cord, associated with partial atrophy of the

ganglion-cells in the anterior cornua. In both the gray and white

substances the blood-vessels were dilated, and, {574} as already

stated, the central canal was obliterated. The brain was healthy. The

supinators of the upper extremities, the gastrocnemii at the lower,

were richly infiltrated with fat streaked with long bands of connective

tissue; the remaining muscles were atrophied.

[Footnote 75: _Archiv der Heilkunde_, xii. 2, 1871.]

The anatomical lesions in this case are identical with those of the

special symptom-complex described by Charcot as amyotrophic lateral

sclerosis. Certain symptoms of lateral sclerosis are wanting to

complete the clinical history, but at least as many are lacking for a

typical history of pseudo-hypertrophic paralysis. Only the muscles of

the neck hypertrophied: the gastrocnemii and adductors, primarily

atrophied, later regained some of their original size. The fatty

infiltration of the calf and muscles was unattended by

pseudo-enlargement or by retraction: it resembled a fatty substitution

due to nerve-paralysis, rather than the hyperplastic process of

pseudo-hypertrophy.

Setting aside the three foregoing cases, three remain which, together

with an unimpeachable history of pseudo-hypertrophic paralysis, show

positive lesions in the spinal cord. The first and the most famous was

made upon a patient of Gowers by Lockhart Clarke.[76] Changes were

found scattered through the entire length of the cord. "In the upper

cervical region were patches of incipient disintegration in the gray

network of the lateral portion of the cord, the lateral white columns

being healthy. Here and there in the gray substance of the anterior and

posterior cornua the intercellular matrix was wasted and disintegrated,

especially in the neighborhood of the blood-vessels and at the bottom

of the anterior median fissure. Here were accumulated globules of

myeline and other débris of nerve-tissue. The blood-vessels were

distended, their perivascular spaces enlarged. Patches of

disintegration of nerve-fibres of the lateral and posterior columns

were seen in the lower cervical and in the dorsal regions. Globules of

myeline and masses of fatty matter were at some points accumulated at

the entrance of the posterior nerve-roots, and even, to a much less

extent, adjacent to the anterior roots. The most extensive lesion

existed in the lowest part of the dorsal region. In the lateral gray

substance on each side was an area of softening containing an actual

cavity just outside each posterior vesicular column. The latter

remained undamaged.

"The anterior cornua throughout the cord were perfectly normal, though

the processes of the cells were perhaps less distinct than elsewhere.

Further, notwithstanding the spots of disintegration in the lateral

columns there was in them no change comparable to that of lateral

sclerosis."[77]

[Footnote 76: _Med.-Chir. Trans._, 1874.]

[Footnote 77: This autopsy was made on a boy of fifteen, in whom the

calves began to hypertrophy at three, and reached their maximum size at

five.]

The second post-mortem was made by Ross on a patient belonging to

Leech: "In the lumbar region of the cord the normal loose and spongy

texture of the central column was replaced by a somewhat dense and

fibrillated tissue, in which no trace of ganglion-cells could be found.

The blood-vessels were enlarged and their walls thickened. In the

anterior cornua the ganglion-cells had completely disappeared from the

median area, the anterior group, and from the margins of all the other

groups. This atrophic process extended into the dorsal and cervical

{575} region, and in the latter the central column was changed in the

manner already described."[78]

[Footnote 78: _Loc. cit._, p. 207. Patient was nine years old at time

of death; the disease had begun with paresis at two; was well developed

at nine.]

The third autopsy is recorded by Drummond in the _Lancet_ for 1881

(vol. ii.): The subject was a boy of fourteen, who never walked after

the age of six. There was found, as the author shows by some good

drawings, disintegration in the lateral gray network of fibres halfway

between the anterior and posterior horns, extending more or less

throughout the cord. In the left lumbar region the tissue had broken

down, and a cavity existed filled with serum, which bulged out the wall

of the cord, forming an apparent tumor.

Several circumstances are common to all the foregoing five cases. In

all, the patients during life had exhibited paresis and atrophy of a

large number of muscles (in Barth's case nearly all), with

pseudo-hypertrophy of some muscles of the lower extremities. In all,

the post-mortem found fatty substitution for muscular fibre in both the

atrophied and the hypertrophied muscles. Finally, in all, the lesions

found in the cord were principally grouped about the central canal.

This was dilated (Pekelharing) or obliterated (Müller, Barth); the

hyperæmia was always most intense in its vicinity; and it was in the

lateral gray substance adjoining, or in the gray network between it and

the lateral white columns, that patches of disintegration were

principally noted (Clarke, Ross). Negatively, the absence of any

extensive lesion of the anterior cornua is noteworthy in all the cases

but one; and here this lesion was evidently secondary to the lateral

sclerosis (Barth). On the other hand, the differences between these

cases were as numerous as the resemblances. Two resembled each other in

the presence of cerebral symptoms and of an internal hydrocephalus to

account for them (Pekelharing, Müller); in one alone was there lateral

sclerosis (Barth); in one, cavities in the lateral portion of the

central gray column (Clarke); in one, traces of an acute polio-myelitis

(Müller), Finally, in only three cases (Clarke, Ross, Drummond) was the

clinical history perfectly characteristic of the disease.

Comparing these facts with the others, equally significant, where the

autopsy in cases of pseudo-muscular hypertrophy has shown the central

nervous organs to be perfectly healthy, we should be led to

conclude--1st. That if fatty substitution in the muscles is ever to be

associated with lesions of the spinal cord, these are to be sought in

the central gray substance surrounding the central canal. 2d. That,

nevertheless, muscular lesions similar, if not in all respects

identical, can develop as the result of an idiopathic process depending

on causes at present unknown. 3d. That atrophy of muscular fibre and

replacement of it by lipomatous fat are probably determined in several

different ways, and must often be regarded as merely secondary

processes;[79] but that the muscular lesion characteristic of

pseudo-hypertrophy, considered as an idiopathic disease, is the

hyperplasia of connective tissue which originates in the perimysium

interum of the muscles. This lesion was well marked in the Ross-Leech

case, much less distinct in the three we have noted as doubtful

(Gowers).

[Footnote 79: See Leyden's remarks in his essay "Ueber Polio-myelitis

und Neuritis," _Zeitschrift für klin. Med._, 1880.]

{576} PATHOGENY.--These last conclusions, if valid, supersede the

necessity for prolonged discussion of the question whether

pseudo-hypertrophic paralysis be a peripheric disease or central

disease. By the latter term authors almost invariably mean a disease

dependent on morbid processes in the spinal cord. Hammond is almost

alone in affirming that these exist, and bases his opinion on only

three autopsies, of which two are the doubtful cases of Müller and

Barth. Mobius,[80] recognizing the frequent absence of spinal lesions,

nevertheless claims that the hereditary, frequently congenital, nature

of the disease proves that it inheres in the nervous system. Gowers,

however, points out that the exclusive inheritance through the

mother--that is, from the ovum--is a circumstance unknown in nervous

diseases. This mode of inheritance is observed in hæmophilia, which

also resembles pseudo-hypertrophy in being almost confined to males.

[Footnote 80: _Volkmann's Sammlung_, No. 171.]

The pseudo-muscular hypertrophy of children so strikingly resembles in

many particulars the progressive muscular atrophy of adults that the

theory of their essential identity could not fail to suggest itself.

Friedreich unhesitatingly advocates this theory. Many of the facts

which support it become for him additional confirmation of the

peripheric nature of the adult disease, where, nevertheless, the

anterior ganglion-cells of the cord are habitually found atrophied.[81]

[Footnote 81: According to the Friedreich theory, the lesion of the

anterior cornua is coincident with or consecutive to degeneration of

the other extremity of the nervo-muscular motor apparatus.

Lichtheim, _Arch. f. Psych._, viii., quoted in _Brain_, 1879, vol. ii.,

No. 1, quotes a case of progressive muscular atrophy with typical

changes in the muscles, but unaccompanied by the slightest change in

the nerves or nerve-roots, large ganglion-cells of the anterior cornua,

or other part of the spinal cord. The author agrees in regarding the

nearly allied pseudo-hypertrophic paralysis as a peripheric affection.

See also Hayem.]

Eulenburg thus sums up the relations between progressive muscular

atrophy and pseudo-hypertrophic paralysis: In both diseases the

fundamental muscular lesion consists in a chronic irritative process,

which starts from the interstitial connective tissue, and secondarily

affects the muscular fibre. In children, pseudo-hypertrophy of the

muscles of the lower extremities is regularly followed by primary

atrophy of many of the muscles in the upper half of the body, and

secondary atrophy in almost all. In a case of Eulenburg's the two

typical diseases seemed to coexist in the same patient, an adult woman.

More frequently they coexist in the same family, as in the observation

by Russel, where two brothers suffered from progressive atrophy, a

third from pseudo-hypertrophic paralysis.

Pick[82] relates a case where a typical atrophy of the upper

extremities and of the trunk was accompanied by moderate hypertrophy of

the calves, with proliferation in the calf-muscles of the interstitial

fat and connective tissue. Charcot admits a special form of atrophia

musculorum lipomatosa which complicates progressive muscular atrophy,

and is associated, therefore, with atrophy of the anterior

ganglion-cells; with which, however, it has no direct connection.

[Footnote 82: "Ueber einen Fall von progressive muskel atrophie,"

_Archiv für Psych._, Bd. vi., 1876.]

The adult and infantile muscular diseases differ by the remarkable, and

sometimes even colossal, apparent development of the calf-muscles

through the excessive development in them of fat and connective {577}

tissue--by the fact that the latter disease invariably begins in the

lower extremities, and is almost peculiar to childhood, while the

progressive atrophy begins in the upper half of the body, and usually

the hands, and is as nearly exclusively limited to adult life. For both

diseases may be admitted, with Friedreich, "a congenital nutritive and

formative weakness of the striated muscle-substance" (Gowers). But, we

may add, in progressive atrophy this does not become manifest until the

muscles have been for many years subjected to the strain of constant

employment: in pseudo-hypertrophy the nutritive failure appears early

in the flagging of the developmental forces at the moment that these

are strained in muscular growth.

It would perhaps be more correct to ascribe the error of development to

a perversion of nutritive forces rather than to their weakness. For

there is no arrest in the general development of the limbs, such as

occurs after infantile spinal paralysis: the bones grow normally; the

initial lesion is hyperplasia of the connective tissue--possibly, also,

true hypertrophy of the muscular fibre. The wasting is secondary.

Perhaps the terminal nerve-plates, or else the capillary network on the

outside of the primitive bundles of muscle-fibre, does not grow in

proportion to the increasing mass, and therefore becomes insufficient

for its nutrition (Auerbach).

The question arises whether the primitive error of development does not

lie in the capillary network. Ranvier has shown that the capillaries of

muscles are specially adapted to them, being disposed in quadrangles,

at whose corners the vascular canal dilates into little pouches. It is

surmised that these pouches serve as reservoirs to hold an extra supply

of blood for the moment of contraction.[83] If such specialty of

structure be necessary for the proper accomplishment of the muscular

contraction, it is evident that any congenital defect in the

arrangement of the blood-vessels might disturb in many ways the balance

of muscular nutrition. The absence of vascular reservoirs, for

instance, would render the supply of blood during the contraction

insufficient: the contraction must then be inadequate or exhausting,

and the physiological stimulus to the growth of the muscle wanting. On

the other hand, the capillaries being, by the hypothesis, adapted to

the lower type which nourishes connective tissue, this would become

nourished at the expense of the contractile fibre, and the known

hyperplasia would result.

[Footnote 83: _Cours d'Anatomie au Collège de France_, 1880.]

That morbid vascularization exists, is shown by the peculiar mottled

appearance of the skin, which has often been interpreted as a proof of

vaso-motor paralysis (Duchenne). On such an hypothesis, further, the

curious and otherwise inexplicable relations between pseudo-hypertrophy

and hæmophilia[84] would be explained. The one or the other hereditary

disease would be due to imperfection in the blood-vessels--here of

structure, there of architecture. This imperfection could be directly

traced to the mesoblast in the embryo, in which the vascular tissues

exclusively originate. Whether we should admit the bold speculation of

His[85] that the tissues of the mesoblast are exclusively derived from

the ovum, while {578} the archiblastic tissues--the nervous, muscular,

epithelial, and glandular--come from the substance of the spermatozoa

fused with it, is beyond the scope of this paper to discuss. But were

this speculation well founded, the independent morbid tendencies of the

mesoblast would be rendered by so much the more plausible.

[Footnote 84: Part of which do not exist between pseudo-hypertrophy and

progressive atrophy, since the latter disease is not exclusively

inherited through the mother.]

[Footnote 85: _Unsere Körper Form_.]

The fact that the disease begins in the extensor muscles of the lower

extremities is probably to be explained by the rapid development of

these muscles during early childhood, and by the functional strain

imposed on them during the effort of learning to walk. It is thus

really analogous to the début of progressive atrophy in the muscles of

the hands of adults--the muscles whose functional activity is the most

incessant and the most complex during adult life.

The preponderance of the disease in males remains unexplained, unless

it be that the greater extent of muscular development in the male

necessitates a greater intensity of developmental force for the

muscles, whose deficiency, therefore, would earlier be made manifest.

DIAGNOSIS.--The diagnosis of pseudo-hypertrophic paralysis can never be

difficult in typical cases and at an advanced period of the disease.

During the early period the diagnosis rests on the gradual diminution

of force in the lower extremities, without atrophy or with apparently

excellent development of their muscles; the straddling of the legs,

lordosis, and lateral oscillation, all at first slight, but constantly

becoming more and more emphasized; the peculiar method of rising by

placing the hands on the knees and then gradually climbing up the

thighs. In the second period the enlargement of the calf or other

muscles of the lower limbs, in the third the extension of the paresis

to the upper extremities, associated with wasting of the pectorals and

usually some of the extensors of the back, confirm beyond question the

diagnosis. This may be further established by examination of small

fragments of muscular fibre removed by means of the harpoon or trocar,

and the repeated examinations, which serve, moreover, to mark the

progress of the disease.

Few diseases require to be differentiated. One very rare disease that

might be confounded with pseudo-hypertrophy is the infantile form of

progressive muscular atrophy. This is distinguished from the ordinary

form of atrophy by beginning in the muscles of the face,[86] especially

the orbicularis oris, from whose defective contractility the lips

become thick and motionless. The morbid process then progresses

downward, and is thus in notable contrast with that of

pseudo-hypertrophy, which invariably begins in the lower limbs and

extends upward, invading the face only by exception.

[Footnote 86: Duchenne has seen seventeen cases of this disease.]

It is probably after the establishment of talipes equinus and of

flexions at the knee- or hip-joint that pseudo-hypertrophy would be

most liable to be confounded with infantile atrophic paralysis. In the

latter, however, the talipes is much more rarely double, and, if

existing, is usually complicated with varus. At an advanced stage of

pseudo-hypertrophy the enlargement of the calf is apt to be confined to

its upper part, and the retraction of the lower half simulates atrophy,

even when this has not really set in. At this stage, moreover, the

thighs and gluteal regions are usually atrophied, so that the

resemblance to an atrophic paralysis may be considerable. This may be

still further increased in those rare {579} cases of extensive

polio-myelitis, where paralysis of one or more of the upper extremities

coincides with lumbar paraplegia. It is extremely rare, however, that

both arms are paralyzed and atrophied,[87] while this is the rule, with

approximative symmetry, in pseudo-hypertrophy. In the latter disease,

moreover, there are paralysis and atrophy of the muscles of the trunk

and abdomen, which is scarcely ever seen, and never to the same extent,

in atrophic paralysis. The reflex excitability is lost in the latter

disease, as also the faradic; the latter, often intact in

pseudo-hypertrophy, rarely is quite abolished. Finally, the history of

the case is generally decisive: gradual development in the one, sudden

onset, with immediate maximum intensity of paralysis, in the other;

primitive wasting of the paralyzed muscles in the spinal paralysis,

enlargement preceding the atrophy in the pseudo-hypertrophic paralysis.

[Footnote 87: A patient described by Eulenburg was affected by such

general paralysis, but recovered after five months' treatment.]

Rachitis, with its frequent polysarcia and paretic gait, might

sometimes lead to a suspicion of muscular pseudo-hypertrophy, as,

conversely, the earlier symptoms of the latter disease may be

erroneously referred to rachitis. The error is all the more facile

because children afflicted with pseudo-hypertrophy are not unfrequently

rachitic, and the symptoms of specific paralysis and muscular sclerosis

may easily seem to deepen out of those of muscular inertia and

subcutaneous fat which are due to the nutritive diathesis. The

consistency of the enlarged limbs is, however, different--soft and

flabby in rachitis, hard, even stony, in pseudo-hypertrophy. When in

the latter the subcutaneous fat is atrophied instead of increased, the

muscles seem to make hernial protrusions through the emaciated skin.

A system of practical medicine. By American authors. Vol. 4 · 第 75 / 116 段