It is probable that the ultimate cause of the irritation within the

muscular mass, whatever it is, is common to all cases, and that when

myalgia occurs in a healthy man after extraordinary muscular effort or

exposure to cold damp when fatigued, or in a delicate child who has

played too long, or in a poorly-fed weaver working long hours over his

loom, or in the consumptive whose cough gives him no rest, or in

connection with any chronic disease or acute disease, whether

tonsillitis or bronchitis or fever or rheumatism, it is the same

thing--the expression of muscles or groups of muscles overworked. It is

not a disease; it is not a symptom of disease. It is an accident of

many diseases--of any disease that lowers nutrition. And it is not less

an accident of health when such muscular effort is demanded as is

beyond the capacity of health.

The essential pathology of myalgia is obscure. It is not an

inflammation, as that term is generally understood, but there is ground

for the opinion that the lesions are of the nature of a subinflammatory

process within the muscle. The not uncommon instances in which an

injury or contusion--in short, traumatism--has been followed shortly

after the recovery by severe myalgia are of further value as

illustrating this theory.

The obstacles in the way of precise histological investigation in cases

of acute myalgia are so great that it seems probable that further

knowledge is to be reached for the most part by way of clinical work.

DIAGNOSIS.--The fundamental question for consideration in this place is

whether we are dealing in any given case with local manifestations of a

constitutional disease or with purely local phenomena. That the latter

is the correct view seems to the writer to admit of no further

discussion in this article. This position being assumed, and due regard

having already been paid to the differential diagnosis between myalgia

and rheumatism, neuralgia and inflammatory myositis, it seems useless

to enter upon the consideration of the diagnosis between this and other

painful affections to which it bears but slight and superficial

resemblances. Spinal irritation, hypochondriasis, locomotor ataxia,

alcoholism, syphilis, gout, and lithiasis are on the one hand attended

by pains which are clearly not myalgic in character, and on the other

hand peculiarly predispose those subject to them to this affection of

poorly-nourished and easily-overworked muscles. Each of these diseases,

however, presents a complexus of {538} symptoms in which that which is

essential and characteristic is readily to be distinguished from that

which--as myalgia--is accidental.

A few words concerning the diagnosis of some of the varieties may not

be amiss.

In pleurodynia the ordinary physical signs of pleural, pulmonary, and

cardiac disease are absent, the painful points characteristic of

intercostal neuralgia are not found, and there is little or no

constitutional disturbance.

The diagnosis of myalgia lumbalis is, as a rule, unattended by

difficulty. The muscular pain in the loins is characteristic. It is

greatly increased by efforts to rise or to turn in bed, and is

associated with diffused slight tenderness upon pressure, but never

with the acute localized soreness of neuralgia or abscess. The

practitioner must, however, guard against the danger of mistaking the

back pains of more serious affections for lumbago by the careful

examination, in all cases, of the back and abdomen, and by the

investigation of the condition of the urine. The possibility that pain

in this region may be caused by spinal meningitis, lumbar abscess from

spinal caries, sciatica, inflammatory affections of the hip-joint,

renal calculus, perinephritis, abdominal aneurism, diseases of the

pelvic viscera, and the onset of certain of the acute infectious

diseases must not be overlooked.

PROGNOSIS.--Under satisfactory conditions as regards hygiene and

treatment the prognosis is always favorable. It becomes in chronic

cases unfavorable as regards complete recovery when by reason of

poverty, unhealthy occupations, unwholesome surroundings, or

established wasting diseases the nutrition of the muscles and their

physiological rest are permanently interfered with, and the balance

between their power and work permanently deranged.

TREATMENT.--The indications are threefold: (_a_) relief of pain; (_b_)

physiological rest for the affected muscles; (_c_) restoration of the

balance between the nutrition of the muscle and the work it has to do.

(_a_) Relief of pain is often secured by rest in a posture that permits

the complete relaxation of the muscles involved. In acute cases due to

overwork pure and simple, and where complete rest is attainable, little

other treatment is required. In the course of a few hours or days the

function of the muscles is fully restored and their contractions are

performed without pain. Where, however, complete muscular relaxation is

impracticable or fails to afford relief, anodynes are necessary.

Morphine hypodermically is very useful, but this altogether

independently of any local action. Continuous dry or moist heat by

means of flannels, flaxseed poultices, spongio-piline, etc. may be

applied. Various anodyne lotions are useful. Liniments containing

aconite, belladonna, chloroform, or chloral also afford relief. The

compound belladonna liniment of the British Pharmacopoeia is especially

to be recommended. So also are plasters of belladonna, conium, and

mustard. Galvanism occasionally gives prompt relief. The same statement

may be made of the use of static electricity. The pain sometimes

disappears under gentle and long-continued massage.

(_b_) Rest is usually enforced by the intensity of the pain attending

movement. In severe cases the bed is a necessity. In affections of the

respiratory muscles, as pleurodynia, firm support of the side, by means

of {539} overlapping strips of plaster drawn from the spine downward

and forward in the direction of the ribs to the median line in front,

is sometimes necessary and always comfortable.

(_c_) The balance of nutrition is restored by rest. Local means to

further this end are such as relieve pain--heat, anodyne and

stimulating frictions, massage, and galvanism. The parts must be

protected from sudden changes in temperature by extra thicknesses of

flannel or sheets of wool or cotton batting--if necessary covered with

a piece of oiled silk or fine gum-cloth. In old cases prolonged massage

with passive movements, shampooing, and the slowly interrupted galvanic

current, alternating with rapid faradic currents, are followed by good

results.

As a constitutional measure a Dover's powder at night, followed by mild

purgation in the morning, is often indicated. Purgation is especially

called for in plethoric or gouty persons, in whom also Turkish or vapor

baths are of great service, while poorly-nourished, anæmic subjects

demand quinine, iron, lime, and cod-liver oil. If the attack linger,

full doses of ammonium chloride, and in old cases potassium iodide in

moderate doses well diluted and long continued, are advocated; and in

stubborn cases Anstie recommends deep acupuncture of the muscle near

its tendinous attachment. In cases marked by a tendency to spastic

rigidity the repeated hypodermic injection of atropine may often be

relied upon as the speediest means of cure.

Where the general nutrition is poor the local trouble is apt to be

obstinate, and often yields only to measures that restore the general

health.

{540}

PROGRESSIVE MUSCULAR ATROPHY.[1]

BY JAMES TYSON, A.M., M.D.

[Footnote 1: From the view taken by the author as to the nature of the

disease under consideration, it is evident that its proper position

would be under affections of the nervous system. But as this view has

not been established to the satisfaction of all who have studied the

disease, it seems appropriate to place it in the intermediate position

selected for it by the Editor, between muscular and nervous diseases.]

SYNONYMS.--Chronic anterior poliomyelitis; Spinal form of progressive

muscular atrophy; Adult form of progressive muscular atrophy; Wasting

palsy (Roberts); Cruveilhier's atrophy; Amyotrophia spinalis

progressiva (Erb).

DEFINITION.--Progressive muscular atrophy is a gradually progressive

wasting of a group or groups of voluntary muscles, independent of

primary functional inactivity and of local lesion to nerve or muscle.

HISTORY.--We are indebted to William Roberts[2] for the best historical

account of this disease up to the date of publication of his monograph.

Van Swieten seems to have described the first case, in 1754, but

without comment. Cooke in his work _On Palsy_,[3] published 1822,

relates a case which had been under the care of Cline--that of an

officer, first attacked in 1795. Caleb H. Parry[4] reported another

case in 1825, and Sir Charles Bell[5] three cases in 1830. Abercrombie

described a marked case in 1828,[6] Dorwall[7] three striking cases in

1831, and Herbert Mayo[8] two evident cases in 1836. In 1849, Duchenne

presented to the Institute of France his memoir on _Atrophie musculaire

avec Transformation graisseuse_. In the next year Aran published his

essay entitled _Recherches sur une Maladie non encore décide du Système

musculaire_ (_Atrophie musculaire progressive_),[9] in which he claimed

priority in description. He reported in all eleven cases, and regarded

it as a primary muscular affection. Aran's researches were very

important, and have caused his name to be intimately associated with

the disease along with that of Duchenne.

[Footnote 2: _An Essay on Wasting Palsy_, London, 1858.]

[Footnote 3: London, 1822, p 31.]

[Footnote 4: _Collected Works_, London, 1825, p. 523.]

[Footnote 5: _The Nervous System of the Human Body_, London, 1830.]

[Footnote 6: _On the Brain and Spinal Cord_, 1828, p. 419.]

[Footnote 7: _London Medical Gazette_, vol. vii., 1830-31, p. 201.]

[Footnote 8: _Outlines of Human Pathology_, London, 1836.]

[Footnote 9: _Archives générales de Méd._, t. xxiv., Sept. and Oct.,

1850.]

Cruveilhier's studies were commenced as early as 1832, but his results

were not published until March, 1853,[10] when he read his memoir

before the Academy of Medicine of Paris. He seems to have made the

first autopsy, and was much surprised at the absence of any apparent

lesion of the {541} spinal cord. So enthusiastic and so exhaustive was

his study of the disease that his name, too, has become almost

inseparably associated with it, and the term Cruveilhier's atrophy is

one of those by which it is known. He concluded from his earlier

autopsies that the lesions were solely in the muscular system, which is

progressively destroyed, while the brain and spinal cord may remain

perfectly normal. In a later case (his third), terminating January,

1853, he found atrophy of the anterior roots of the spinal nerves, and

then concluded that the disease resided "not in the muscles themselves,

but in the anterior roots of the spinal nerves." But after the

termination of his fourth case, in which an autopsy was also secured,

he placed the primary lesion in the gray matter of the cord, whence he

considered the anterior roots take their origin.

[Footnote 10: _Ibid._, May, 1853, p. 561.]

Thouvenet,[11] an interne of Cruveilhier's, published in 1851 a thesis

based on some cases collected in the Charité, and was the first to

claim that the disease resides primarily in the peripheral nerves, and

that it must be classed among rheumatic affections.

[Footnote 11: _Gaz. des Hôp._, Nos. 143 and 145, 1851.]

In December, 1851, E. Meryon[12] read a paper before the

Medico-Chirurgical Society of London entitled "Granular and Fatty

Degeneration of the Voluntary Muscles." His observations appear to have

been made quite independently of any preceding researches. He argues

that the primary morbid change is a default of nutrition in the

muscular fibres.

[Footnote 12: _Med.-Chir. Trans._, vol. xxxv. p. 73.]

Subsequently, cases were published in 1853 by Bouvier, Landry, Burg,

and Niepce in France; in 1854 by Chambers in England, Guérin and Robin

in France, Cohn, Virchow, and Betz in Germany, and by Schneevogt in

Holland; in 1855 laborious essays were published by Oppenheimer,

Wachsmuth, and Eisenmann, and cases by Hasse, Valentiner, Virchow,

Meyer, and Diemer in Germany, and Gros in France. Duchenne's work on

_Local Application of Electricity_, also published in 1855, contains

much information on the subject.

Since 1855 the reports of cases and papers on the subject have been so

numerous as to make it unprofitable to enumerate them. Among the most

notable are those of Eisenmann, published in _Canstatt's Jahresbericht_

for 1856; Roberts's classic work on _Wasting Palsy_, in 1858; the

papers of Lockhart Clarke in 1866 and 1867,[13] and of Swarzenski in

1867;[14] Kussmaul's clinical lecture[15] and Friedreich's treatise[16]

in 1873; and Eulenburg's article on "Progressive Muscular Atrophy" in

_Ziemssen's Cyclopædia of Practical Medicine_, published in German in

1875 and in English in 1877. An important case, in consequence of the

careful post-mortem study of the nervous tissues, is one recently

reported by Wood and Dercam.[17]

[Footnote 13: _Med.-Chir. Transactions_, xlix., 1866, p. 171, and l.,

1867, p. 489.]

[Footnote 14: _Die Progressive Muskelatrophie_, Berlin.]

[Footnote 15: "Ueber die fortschreidende Bulbärparalyse und ihr

Verhältniss zur progressiven Muskelatrophie." _Sammlung klinische

Vorträge_, liv.]

[Footnote 16: _Ueber progressive Muskelatrophie, über wahre und falsche

Muskelhypertrophie_, Berlin, 1873.]

[Footnote 17: _Therapeutic Gazette_, March 16, 1885.]

ETIOLOGY.--The cause of this affection in a large number of cases is

quite unknown. That hereditation plays an important part seems well

determined by numerous observations, among which may be mentioned those

of Roberts, Friedreich, Hemptenmacher, Trousseau, Meryon, {542}

Eulenburg, Sr. and Jr., Naunyn,[18] Hammond, and Osler.[19] In the Farr

family, reported by Osler, 13 individuals in two generations have been

affected, 6 females and 7 males--a larger proportion of the former than

is common in this disease. Of these 9 had died at date of publication

of paper. With the exception of two, all occurred or proved fatal after

the age of forty. Of the 10 instances in the second generation, 5 are

the offspring of males and 5 the offspring of females. The disease has

not yet appeared in the third generation, which promises between forty

and fifty individuals, several of whom are over thirty years of age.

[Footnote 18: _Berliner med. Wochenschrift_, Nos. 42 and 43, 1873.]

[Footnote 19: _Archives of Medicine_, vol. iv., No. 3, Dec., 1880.]

The over-use of the muscles involved seems to be a well-determined

cause in certain cases of true muscular atrophy. The following

interesting illustrations are given by Eulenburg:[20] Betz observed

atrophy of the side three times in the cases of smiths and saddlers,

who had to do heavy work with the right hand; Gull, in a tailor after

excessive exertion; Hammond reports a case apparently due to excessive

use of one thumb and finger in playing faro; Friedreich, one of a

dragoon who may have exhausted his left hand in holding the bridle

while riding; another in a morocco-leather worker, who used to press

hard with his left hand; and a musician who played several hours a day

on the bass viol. Schneevogt names two cases of primary atrophy of the

shoulder-muscles, especially of the deltoid of the right side--one of a

sailor who had to pump for days together on a leaking ship, and the

other of the left side in a woman who always carried her child on the

left arm while suckling it. Continued threshing and the handling of a

musket have both been followed by it in the muscles called into play by

these exercises. Roberts was able to trace the effects of over-muscular

exertion in producing the disease in 35 out of 69 cases. As a

determining cause, at least, therefore, we must admit the over-use of

muscles.

[Footnote 20: _Op. cit._]

There is reason to believe, too, that this form of atrophy is one of

the consequences of senility--that the tendency to connective-tissue

overgrowth which characterizes old age operates to produce, in a way to

be presently explained, an atrophy of groups of muscles. In a woman

aged seventy, now under my care, the fingers of both hands are

clawed--became so inappreciably almost, and the condition is still

increasing.

In addition to the above-named causes, long-continued exposure to cold,

and especially to the action of very cold water, has been named.

Traumatic influences, such as injuries to nerve and muscle, have been

called upon to account for localized and progressive atrophy, but these

are excluded by our definition from the category of true progressive

muscular atrophy.

Cases have also occurred in the course of convalescence. Typhoid fever,

rheumatism, measles, scarlet fever, cold during salivation,

vaccination, childbed, excessive venery, syphilis,--have all been held

responsible for a certain number of cases.

AGE AND SEX.--In examining the literature of acute muscular atrophy it

is found that cases are reported at all ages. Thus, Wachsmuth, quoted

by Eulenburg, found among 49 cases 13 under the age of fifteen, 8 from

fifteen to twenty, 22 from twenty to fifty, and only 6 over fifty

years. On the other hand, Roberts--who, following Aran, divides the

disease into the general form and partial form--says the latter very

rarely falls on {543} individuals under adult age or over fifty, while

the average age of the instances of the partial form studied by him was

thirty-two years and four months. In 10 instances of the general form

the patients were under twelve, and 2 more are reported as children; 1

was said to be sixty-nine and another fifty-four, the average being

twenty-eight years and three months. Of Eulenburg's own cases, 7

acquired the disease before the age of ten, 6 before the twentieth

year, 2 before the thirtieth, 8 before the fortieth, 5 before the

fiftieth, and none later. The latter observer also finds that whenever

the disease is hereditary it occurs earlier, usually before the close

of the twentieth year. This was certainly not the case in the Farr

family, reported by Osler.

I am inclined to believe, especially in the light of Charcot's[21] and

of Erb's[22] recent studies, that the true spinal form of progressive

muscular atrophy is a disease of adult life, and that the majority of

cases reported as occurring in early life are instances either of what

Erb calls the juvenile form of progressive muscular atrophy or of

pseudo-hypertrophic paralysis.

[Footnote 21: "Revision nosographique des Atrophies musculaires

progressive," _Le Progrès méd._, No. 10, 1885, i. 314-335.]

[Footnote 22: "Ueber die Juvenile Form der Progressive Muskelatrophie

und ihre Beziehungen zur sogenannten Pseudohypertrophie," _Deutsches

Archiv für klin. Med._, xxxiv. 1884, S. 467.]

As to sex, males predominate. Thus, according to Friedreich's

statistics, out of 176 cases but 33 were females, or about 19 per cent.

Of Roberts's collection of 99, 84 were males and 15 females. Of 28

cases noted by Eulenburg, 17 were in men and 11 women. This is

doubtless owing to the fact that men are subjected to the causes of the

disease more than women. For Roberts early noted that women who engage

in needlework, washing, and household service are apparently not less

liable than men similarly employed, and he found that of those whose

labor did not press excessively on any particular sets of muscles

females formed even a majority of cases.

Some singular freaks of selection have presented themselves in the

matter of sex, particularly in the cases which have been ascribed to

hereditation. Thus it will sometimes attack only the male members of a

family. A remarkable instance of this was observed by Meryon, in which

four sons were attacked and six daughters remained unaffected; and,

again, two boys were attacked and two sisters escaped. This may occur

also independent of hereditation. Occasionally the reverse takes place,

the sisters only being attacked, while the brothers escape.

PATHOLOGICAL ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY.--Two principal seats of change have

been found to exist in connection with progressive muscular atrophy.

The first and easiest recognized is, of course, the alteration in

muscles; the second, that in the nervous system.

The muscular change is simple, and affords a typical instance of what

is known as numerical atrophy. The muscular fasciculi one after another

undergo fatty metamorphosis, succeeded by absorption of the resulting

fat and substitution of connective tissue. The rate of atrophy varies,

but sooner or later the muscle is more or less substituted by fibrous

bands and cords, over which may be traced reddish lines which represent

muscular tissue in a normal state.

The rationale of these changes has not been always the same. The {544}

older observers regarded them as the result of a primary fatty

metamorphosis of muscular fasciculi, followed by absorption of the

resulting fat. Later it was asserted that the atrophy is secondary to a

myositis or inflammation of muscle, beginning as a hyperplasia of the

interstitial connective tissue in its finest ramifications between the

single primitive fibrils. Along with this are seen the results of

irritation in the primitive bundles themselves, shown by swelling and

multiplication of the muscular corpuscles, proliferation of their

nuclei, and sometimes cloudy swelling. Even hypertrophied muscular

fasciculi and dichotomous and trichotomous subdivision have been noted

by Friedreich.

It sometimes happens that the hyperplastic process in the intermuscular

connective tissue is succeeded by a fatty infiltration of the cells of

the connective tissue, and there results a lipomatosis which is

invariably outside of the muscular fasciculi and between them. This

gives rise to an appearance of hypertrophy which is only apparent, for

the muscular fasciculi are themselves wasted, and proportionally

paralytic. This is seen to occur particularly in the muscles of the

calves of the legs, in which is produced an appearance identical with

that in the disease known as pseudo-hypertrophic muscular paralysis,

with which, indeed, the condition under consideration is considered by

some identical. But although we must admit in certain cases a

complication of a certain degree of lipomatosis with progressive

muscular atrophy, the two diseases are essentially different; and it is

quite likely that in some instances pseudo-hypertrophic muscular

paralysis has been mistaken for progressive muscular atrophy.

The changes in the nervous system are not nearly so simple. They have

been noted in the peripheral nerves, both in their trunks and in their

intermuscular branches; in the anterior roots of the spinal nerves; and

in different parts of the spinal cord, including the central gray

matter, the antero-lateral and posterior columns; also in the

sympathetic system. These nerve-changes are not simultaneous, nor have

they been discovered in every case. It is a noteworthy fact, however,

that as methods of examination have improved and the manipulative skill

of observers has increased the number of negative cases has diminished.

First, as to alterations in peripheral nerves in their ultimate

distribution: The character of these is of a kind usually described as

irritative; that is, there is a hyperplastic process in the

connective-tissue sheaths (neurilemmæ) and their internal

prolongations, consisting in nuclear proliferation and thickening of

the tubular membrane or sheath of Schwann. Varicose distortion of the

medullary sheaths and their subsequent disappearance, together with

destruction of the axis-cylinders, also occurs.

The changes in the peripheral nerve-trunks, as studied in the median,

ulnar, radial, and musculo-spinal, are essentially the same, resulting

in thinning of the diameters of the nerves. These changes, however, are

by no means constant.

A system of practical medicine. By American authors. Vol. 4 · 第 70 / 116 段