CHAPTER XX

THE FUTURE OF CHRISTIANITY IN CHINA

At the great Shanghai Conference we always spoke of the "Church in

China," implying thereby that there was to be one Christian body in the

Chinese empire. This ideal is lofty and not impossible. There is a

reasonable expectation that the great intellectual movement in China

will render the Chinese very ready to accept new ideas, and the rate of

conversion in China gives one reasonable hope that the new ideas may be

Christian and not those of Western materialism. If China becomes

Christian there will no doubt be a great tendency to accept the unity

of Christianity as an essential doctrine. As a race they clearly tend

towards union as much as the Anglo-Saxon race tends towards disunion.

The British empire has been held together by its fear of its enemies;

the Chinese empire has been held together through their natural love of

union, which is the dominant characteristic of the race. Remove the

enemies of the British empire and she will naturally divide, but force

the Chinese empire apart and she will naturally return to one body.

Chinese Christianity will, if it is truly Chinese, tend to one body.

This truth, which I think would have been {243} allowed by the whole

Shanghai Conference, opens up a train of thought which is full of

foreboding and yet of hope.

One obvious criticism of what was said of the Church in China was kept

largely out of sight at the Shanghai Conference, namely, that as the

Roman Communion far outnumbers the whole of the non-Roman Communions

put together, the Church in China, therefore, if it is to consist of

all Christians, will be something very different to what the majority

of those present at that Conference would like. Some men maintain that

the Chinese love of unity will not go so far as to compel the union

between Protestant and Catholic, and that in China the schism which has

rent Christianity in twain in Europe will be continued. I would ask

those who think thus if they think this is desirable even if it is

possible. Once foreign influence and support has been removed, would

not such a division soon produce a state of great friction, resulting

probably in the destruction of the smaller body. But it is most

improbable; a race which has habitually put together Taoism, Buddhism,

and Confucianism will have no difficulty at all in uniting Romanism and

Protestantism. I do not mean to say that Rome will conquer; it does

not seem likely. The power of the Romans is great when they are

preaching our common Christianity, but their peculiar doctrine of the

pre-eminence of Rome is most unattractive to the Chinaman. After all,

Rome is a very small place to a man who lives in China. Think how

little {244} we know of ancient Chinese history, and realise how little

China knows of the history of our civilisation. Home at the present

day is to the Chinaman merely the capital of Germany's weakest ally.

The reasoning of the universality of the Roman Church, always faulty,

seems almost ridiculous in China. The Chinaman on one side is

conversant with America, on the other side she is in touch with India,

while on the north she has a frontier which stretches for thousands and

thousands of miles between her and the great Orthodox Church of Russia.

One's eyes naturally turn to this immense line of frontier between

Confucianism and Christianity, and one wonders how any Chinaman can

possibly think of Rome as the one Catholic Church. If the Roman

Church, with its foreign domination and its tacit acceptance of the

fact that only members of the Italian nation can receive Divine

authority to guide the Church on earth, is unattractive to the mind of

the man who lives in the Far East, on the other hand its ornate and

dignified services must be most attractive to a race whose national

philosophy puts pre-eminent weight on dignity and decorum in dress and

demeanour. If the Roman Church could give up her Latin services, could

frankly become a national Church which owed no obedience to any Pontiff

outside China, one would regret the possibility but one would have to

allow the probability of her complete domination over the Chinese

empire. Again one's eyes turn to the northern frontier, and one asks

oneself {245} whether that great Orthodox Church, the dignity of whose

services is without parallel, and which frankly accepts the national

Church as a reasonable Christian position, will not one day be a large

factor in the future missionary work in China. After what we had seen

and heard at the Centenary Conference, and after we had realised the

great extent of the Roman work, we felt that till one understood why

the Russian Church conducted no missionary work one could not

understand the whole missionary problem; for when the Russian Church

does undertake such work, her geographical position must render her

important.

The whole of this question is of the greatest interest to the student

of missions, but especially to an Anglican. The great value of the

Anglican position has always seemed that, to use an election phrase, we

offer a platform on which all those who call themselves Christian might

possibly unite. The great rent which divides Protestant from Catholic

seems not only to make it impossible for Latin Christians to unite with

the Teuton Protestant Churches, but also renders it hard for the latter

to unite with the great Churches of Eastern Europe. Of course all this

has only an academic interest in England, but in China with its rapidly

growing Christianity and an intellectual revolution surging forward to

unknown possibilities, all this is of vital interest. What will

Chinese Christianity be? Is it to be an ornate Christianity to which

the converts {246} of Rome and possibly the converts of the Orthodox

Church will adhere, an ornate Church sullied no doubt with the faults

of her parents, a Church possibly attractive to the Buddhist, for he

will not need to traverse any great distance in thought to enter her

portals; or is it to be a great Protestant Church, cold and bare,

vigorous and energetic, a Church in which the uniform of the Teuton

mind will sit badly on the Chinese convert, a Church which may in many

things represent truly the will of our mutual Master, but a Church

which leaves the Oriental cold and miserable, while it practically

tears from our Bible those endless chapters on the decoration of Temple

and Tabernacle, those constant commands to an exact and ordered ritual.

I write with what the Germans call "objectivity"; the Teuton within me

dislikes ritual; but the Chinaman is no Teuton, and the Chinaman loves

ritual as much as any man on earth. No one who has been received by a

Chinese Viceroy in his Yamen can have the very slightest doubt on this

subject. If the Protestant bodies hope to force on the Chinese a

non-ornate form of Christianity, they will be doing exactly what the

Italian Church did to the Northern races, and which produced the great

upheaval of the Reformation. The Reformation was essentially the

rebellion of the Teuton mind against a forced acceptance of the Italian

view of Christianity. To force on the Chinese converts a Christianity

shorn of all ritual and display will produce in years to come some

similar upheaval. {247} There is yet a third possibility. The

Anglican position affords the means of avoiding such an upheaval, and

of permitting a union of all Christians on the basis of an ornate

service and evangelical Christianity. For while it permits a service

equal in dignity to that of Rome or of Russia, it insists equally with

the bodies who pride themselves on the name of Protestant on the

supreme value of the Bible.

The very hope I have that Christianity will conquer China makes me

fearful for the future. The age of persecution is past, the blood of

the martyrs has been shed, and the seed of a Church freely sown. But

after the age of persecution comes the age of heresy, and to preserve

Christianity in China from future dangers, not only is union necessary,

but a well-ordered Church bound by creeds, respecting tradition, which

shall embrace all those Christians by whomsoever they have been

converted who love the name of our Lord Jesus Christ. The great danger

I fear for the future Church in China is one of Eastern and not Western

origin. I do not fear the domination of Rome. I doubt that the

Protestant Communions will succeed in ultimately persuading the Chinese

to worship God in a bare building and without vestments.

China and Japan will, if they are conquered by Christianity, be neither

Protestant nor Catholic any more than we are Nestorian or Eutychian.

Their divisions, their dangers, their struggles, will arise from a

wholly different set of circumstances. I fear {248} the dangers will

come from an effort to incorporate Buddhism and Christianity in one

religion. This is all the more probable as it has doubtless happened

before. Nestorianism and Buddhism are the probable parents of the

present Chinese Lamaism. It is, however, not given for us to see into

the future, but we can look back into the past, and we can see that our

predecessors in the faith nearly invariably made the mistake of

supposing that the old dangers were going to recur, and of therefore

depending on the old measures of defence.

The future Church in the Far East must fight her own battles. She must

solve her own problems. All we can do is to hand over to her the truth

in all its fulness, and teach her to look for divine guidance, to

forget such words as Protestant, Roman Catholic, Nonconformist, and

Anglican; to learn merely the word "Christian" and the word "Love." If

Far Eastern Christianity will have its battles to fight, it will have

also its message to give to the West, "that they without us should not

be made perfect." It may be that the message of the East to the West

will be that as God is One, so must His followers be; that strong and

mighty as is the West, there is in her an element of the very greatest

weakness; that the discord that reigns between Christian and Christian,

between race and race, between class and class, is not the will of the

Creator, but is the result of the national sins of the white races.

The Far East, with its greater power of unity, {249} may illumine the

West with a higher conception of this great virtue, and the world may

be a far holier and happier place when the yellow race has preached to

the world the great doctrine of peace on earth and goodwill to men.

{253}

THE NEW AND THE OLD LEARNING

Changing China · 第 20 / 27 章