I did burst through it.

I found voice, though the voice was a shriek. I remember that I broke

forth with words like these, “I do not fear, my soul does not fear”; and

at the same time I found strength to rise.

Still in that profound gloom, I rushed to one of the windows, tore aside

the curtain, flung open the shutters; my first thought was, LIGHT.

And when I saw the moon, high, clear, and calm, I felt a joy that almost

compensated for the previous terror. There was the moon, there was also

the light from the gas-lamps in the deserted, slumberous street. I

turned to look back into the room; the moon penetrated its shadow very

palely and partially, but still there was light. The dark thing,

whatever it might be, was gone; except that I could yet see a dim

shadow, which seemed the shadow of that shade, against the opposite

wall.

My eye now rested on the table, and from under the table (which was

without cloth or cover, an old mahogany round table) rose a hand,

visible as far as the wrist. It was a hand, seemingly, as much of flesh

and blood as my own, but the hand of an aged person, lean, wrinkled,

small too, a woman’s hand. That hand very softly closed on the two

letters that lay on the table; hand and letters both vanished. Then came

the same three loud measured knocks I had heard at the bed-head before

this extraordinary drama had commenced.

As these sounds slowly ceased, I felt the whole room vibrate sensibly;

and at the far end rose, as from the floor, sparks or globules like

bubbles of light, many-colored—green, yellow, fire-red, azure—up and

down, to and fro, hither, thither, as tiny will-o’-the-wisps the sparks

moved, slow or swift, each at its own caprice. A chair (as in the

drawing-room below) was now advanced from the wall without apparent

agency, and placed at the opposite side of the table.

Suddenly, as forth from the chair, grew a shape, a woman’s shape. It was

distinct as a shape of life, ghastly as a shape of death. The face was

that of youth, with a strange, mournful beauty; the throat and shoulders

were bare, the rest of the form in a loose robe of cloudy white.

It began sleeking its long yellow hair, which fell over its shoulders;

its eyes were not turned toward me, but to the door; it seemed

listening, watching, waiting. The shadow of the shade in the background

grew darker, and again I thought I beheld the eyes gleaming out from the

summit of the shadow, eyes fixed upon that shape.

As if from the door, though it did not open, grew out another shape,

equally distinct, equally ghastly—a man’s shape, a young man’s. It was

in the dress of the last century, or rather in a likeness of such dress;

for both the male shape and the female, though defined, were evidently

unsubstantial, impalpable—simulacre, fantasms; and there was something

incongruous, grotesque, yet fearful, in the contrast between the

elaborate finery, the courtly precision of that old-fashioned garb, with

its ruffles and lace and buckles, and the corpse-like aspect and

ghost-like stillness of the fitting wearer. Just as the male shape

approached the female, the dark shadow darted from the wall, all three

for a moment wrapped in darkness.

When the pale light returned, the two fantoms were as if in the grasp of

the shadow that towered between them, and there was a blood-stain on the

breast of the female; and the fantom male was leaning on its fantom

sword, and blood seemed trickling fast from the ruffles, from the lace;

and the darkness of the intermediate shadow swallowed them up—they were

gone. And again the bubbles of light shot, and sailed, and undulated,

growing thicker and thicker and more wildly confused in their movements.

The closet door to the right of the fireplace now opened, and from the

aperture came the form of a woman, aged. In her hand she held

letters—the very letters over which I had seen _the_ hand close; and

behind her I heard a footstep. She turned round as if to listen, and

then she opened the letters and seemed to read: and over her shoulder I

saw a livid face, the face as of a man long drowned—bloated, bleached,

sea-weed tangled in its dripping hair; and at her feet lay a form as of

a corpse, and beside the corpse cowered a child, a miserable squalid

child, with famine in its cheeks and fear in its eyes. As I looked in

the old woman’s face, the wrinkles and lines vanished, and it became a

face of youth—hard-eyed, stony, but still youth; and the shadow darted

forth and darkened over these fantoms, as it had darkened over the last.

Nothing now was left but the shadow, and on that my eyes were intently

fixed, till again eyes grew out of the shadow—malignant, serpent eyes.

And the bubbles of light again rose and fell, and in their disordered,

irregular, turbulent maze mingled with the wan moonlight. And now from

these globules themselves, as from the shell of an egg, monstrous things

burst out; the air grew filled with them; larvæ so bloodless and so

hideous that I can in no way describe them except to remind the reader

of the swarming life which the solar microscope brings before his eyes

in a drop of water—things transparent, supple, agile, chasing each

other, devouring each other—forms like naught ever beheld by the naked

eye.

As the shapes were without symmetry, so their movements were without

order. In their very vagrancies there was no sport; they came round me

and round, thicker and faster and swifter, swarming over my head,

crawling over my right arm, which was outstretched in involuntary

command against all evil beings.

Sometimes I felt myself touched, but not by them; invisible hands

touched me. Once I felt the clutch as of cold, soft fingers at my

throat. I was still equally conscious that if I gave way to fear I

should be in bodily peril, and I concentered all my faculties in the

single focus of resisting, stubborn will. And I turned my sight from the

shadow, above all from those strange serpent eyes—eyes that had now to

redden as if in the air of some though in naught else around me, I was

aware that there was a will, and a will of intense, creative, working

evil, which might crush down my own.

The pale atmosphere in the room began now to redden as if in the air of

some near conflagration. The larvæ grew lurid as things that live in

fire. Again the room vibrated; again were heard the three measured

knocks; and again all things were swallowed up in the darkness of the

dark shadow, as if out of that darkness all had come, into that darkness

all returned.

As the gloom receded, the shadow was wholly gone. Slowly as it had been

withdrawn, the flame grew again into the candles on the table, again

into the fuel in the grate. The whole room came once more calmly,

healthfully into sight.

The two doors were still closed, the door communicating with the

servant’s room still locked. In the corner of the wall, into which he

had convulsively niched himself, lay the dog. I called to him—no

movement; I approached—the animal was dead; his eyes protruded, his

tongue out of his mouth, the froth gathered round his jaws. I took him

in my arms; I brought him to the fire; I felt acute grief for the loss

of my poor favorite, acute self-reproach; I accused myself of his death;

I imagined he had died of fright. But what was my surprise on finding

that his neck was actually broken—actually twisted out at the vertebræ.

Had this been done in the dark? Must it not have been done by a hand

human as mine? Must there not have been a human agency all the while in

that room? Good cause to suspect it. I cannot tell. I cannot do more

than state the fact fairly; the reader may draw his own inference.

Another surprising circumstance—my watch was restored to the table from

which it had been so mysteriously withdrawn; but it had stopped at the

very moment it was so withdrawn; nor, despite all the skill of the

watchmaker, has it ever gone since—that is, it will go in a strange,

erratic way for a few hours, and then comes to a dead stop; it is

worthless.

Nothing more chanced for the rest of the night; nor, indeed, had I long

to wait before the dawn broke. Not till it was broad daylight did I quit

the haunted house. Before I did so I revisited the little blind room in

which my servant and I had been for a time imprisoned.

I had a strong impression, for which I could not account, that from that

room had originated the mechanism of the phenomena, if I may use the

term, which had been experienced in my chamber; and though I entered it

now in the clear day, with the sun peering through the filmy window, I

still felt, as I stood on its floor, the creep of the horror which I had

first experienced there the night before, and which had been so

aggravated by what had passed in my own chamber.

I could not, indeed, bear to stay more than half a minute within those

walls. I descended the stairs, and again I heard the footfall before me;

and when I opened the street-door I thought I could distinguish a very

low laugh. I gained my own home, expecting to find my runaway servant

there. But he had not presented himself; nor did I hear more of him for

three days, when I received a letter from him, dated from Liverpool, to

this effect:

HONORED SIR—I humbly entreat your pardon, though I can scarcely hope

that you will think I deserve it, unless—which heaven forbid!—you saw

what I did. I feel that it will be years before I can recover myself;

and as to being fit for service, It is out of the question. I am

therefore going to my brother-in-law at Melbourne. The ship sails

to-morrow. Perhaps the long voyage may set me up. I do nothing now but

start and tremble, and fancy it is behind me. I humbly beg you,

honored sir, to order my clothes, and whatever wages are due to me, to

be sent to my mother’s, at Walworth: John knows her address.

The letter ended with additional apologies, somewhat incoherent, and

explanatory details as to effects that had been under the writer’s

charge.

This flight may perhaps warrant a suspicion that the man wished to go to

Australia, and had been somehow or other fraudulently mixed up with the

events of the night. I say nothing in refutation of that conjecture;

rather, I suggest it as one that would seem to many persons the most

probable solution of improbable occurrences.

My own theory remained unshaken. I returned in the evening to the house,

to bring away in a hack cab the things I had left there, with my poor

dog’s body. In this task I was not disturbed, nor did any incident worth

note befall me, except that still, on ascending and descending the

stairs, I heard the same footfall in advance. On leaving the house, I

went to Mr. J——‘s. He was at home. I returned him the keys, told him

that my curiosity was sufficiently gratified, and was about to relate

quickly what had passed, when he stopped me and said, though with much

politeness, that he had no longer any interest in a mystery which none

had ever solved.

I determined at least to tell him of the two letters I had read, as well

as of the extraordinary manner in which they had disappeared; and I then

inquired if he thought they had been addressed to the woman who had died

in the house, and if there were anything in her early history which

could possibly confirm the dark suspicions to which the letters gave

rise.

Mr. J—— seemed startled, and after musing a few moments, answered:

“I know but little of the woman’s earlier history, except, as I before

told you, that her family were known to mine. But you revive some vague

reminiscences to her prejudice. I will make inquiries, and inform you of

their result. Still, even if we could admit the popular superstition

that a person who had been either the perpetrator or the victim of dark

crimes in life could revisit, as a restless spirit, the scene in which

those crimes had been committed, I should observe that the house was

infested by strange sights and sounds before the old woman died. You

smile; what would you say?”

“I would say this: that I am convinced, if we could get to the bottom of

these mysteries, we should find a living, human agency.”

“What! you believe it is all an imposture? For what object?”

“Not an imposture, in the ordinary sense of the word. If suddenly I were

to sink into a deep sleep, from which you could not awake me, but in

that deep sleep could answer questions with an accuracy which I could

not pretend to when awake—tell you what money you had in your pocket,

nay, describe your very thoughts—it is not necessarily an imposture, any

more than it is necessarily supernatural. I should be, unconsciously to

myself, under a mesmeric influence, conveyed to me from a distance by a

human being who had acquired power over me by previous _rapport_.”

“Granting mesmerism, so far carried, to be a fact, you are right. And

you would infer from this that a mesmerizer might produce the

extraordinary effects you and others have witnessed over inanimate

objects—fill the air with sights and sounds?”

“Or impress our senses with the belief in them, we never having been _en

rapport_ with the person acting on us? No. What is commonly called

mesmerism could not do this; but there may be a power akin to mesmerism

and superior to it—the power that in the old days was called magic. That

such a power may extend to all inanimate objects of matter, I do not

say; but if so, it would not be against nature, only a rare power in

nature, which might be given to constitutions with certain

peculiarities, and cultivated by practise to an extraordinary degree.

“That such a power might extend over the dead—that is, over certain

thoughts and memories that the dead may still retain—and compel, not

that which ought properly to be called the SOUL, and which is far beyond

human reach, but rather a fantom of what has been most earth-stained on

earth, to make itself apparent to our senses—is a very ancient though

obsolete theory, upon which I will hazard no opinion. But I do not

conceive the power would be supernatural.

“Let me illustrate what I mean, from an experiment which Paracelsus

describes as not difficult, and which the author of the ‘Curiosities of

Literature’ cites as credible: A flower perishes; you burn it. Whatever

were the elements of that flower while it lived are gone, dispersed, you

know not whither; you can never discover nor re-collect them. But you

can, by chemistry, out of the burnt dust of that flower, raise a

spectrum of the flower, just as it seemed in life.

“It may be the same with a human being. The soul has as much escaped you

as the essence or elements of the flower. Still you may make a spectrum

of it. And this fantom, though in the popular superstition it is held to

be the soul of the departed, must not be confounded with the true soul;

it is but the eidolon of the dead form.

“Hence, like the best-attested stories of ghosts or spirits, the thing

that most strikes us is the absence of what we hold to be soul—that is,

of superior, emancipated intelligence. They come for little or no

object; they seldom speak, if they do come; they utter no ideas above

those of an ordinary person on earth. These American spirit-seers have

published volumes of communications in prose and verse, which they

assert to be given in the names of the most illustrious

dead—Shakespeare, Bacon, heaven knows whom.

“Those communications, taking the best, are certainly not of a whit

higher order than would be communications from living persons of fair

talent and education; they are wondrously inferior to what Bacon,

Shakespeare, and Plato said and wrote when on earth. Nor, what is more

notable, do they ever contain an idea that was not on the earth before.

“Wonderful, therefore, as such phenomena may be (granting them to be

truthful), I see much that philosophy may question, nothing that it is

incumbent on philosophy to deny, namely, nothing supernatural. They are

but ideas conveyed somehow or other (we have not yet discovered the

means) from one mortal brain to another. Whether in so doing tables walk

of their own accord, or fiend-like shapes appear in a magic circle, or

bodiless hands rise and remove material objects, or a thing of darkness,

such as presented itself to me, freeze our blood—still am I persuaded

that these are but agencies conveyed, as by electric wires, to my own

brain from the brain of another.

In some constitutions there is a natural chemistry, and those may

produce chemic wonders; in others a natural fluid, call it electricity,

and these produce electric wonders. But they differ in this from normal

science: they are alike objectless, purposeless, puerile, frivolous.

They lead on to no grand results, and therefore the world does not heed,

and true sages have not cultivated them. But sure I am, that of all I

saw or heard, a man, human as myself, was the remote originator; and, I

believe, unconsciously to himself as to the exact effects produced, for

this reason: no two persons, you say, have ever told you that they

experienced exactly the same thing; well, observe, no two persons ever

experience exactly the same dream.

“If this were an ordinary imposture, the machinery would be arranged for

results that would but little vary; if it were a supernatural agency

permitted by the Almighty, it would surely be for some definite end.

These phenomena belong to neither class. My persuasion is that they

originate in some brain now far distant; that that brain had no distinct

volition in anything that occurred; that what does occur reflects but

its devious, motley, ever-shifting, half-formed thoughts; in short, that

it has been but the dreams of such a brain put into action and invested

with a semi-substance.

“That this brain is of immense power, that it can set matter into

movement, that it is malignant and destructive, I believe. Some material

force must have killed my dog; it might, for aught I know, have sufficed

to kill myself, had I been as subjugated by terror as the dog—had my

intellect or my spirit given me no countervailing resistance in my

will.”

“It killed your dog! that is fearful! Indeed, it is strange that no

animal can be induced to stay in that house; not even a cat. Rats and

mice are never found in it.”

“The instincts of the brute creation detect influences deadly to their

existence. Man’s reason has a sense less subtle, because it has a

resisting power more supreme. But enough; do you comprehend my theory?”

“Yes, though imperfectly; and I accept any crotchet (pardon the word),

however odd, rather than embrace at once the notion of ghosts and

hobgoblins we imbibed in our nurseries. Still, to my unfortunate house

the evil is the same. What on earth can I do with the house?”

“I will tell you what I would do. I am convinced from my own internal

feelings that the small unfurnished room, at right angles to the door of

the bedroom which I occupied, forms a starting-point or receptacle for

the influences which haunt the house; and I strongly advise you to have

the walls opened, the floor removed, nay, the whole room pulled down. I

observe that it is detached from the body of the house, built over the

small back-yard, and could be removed without injury to the rest of the

building.”

“And you think that if I did that——”

“You would cut off the telegraph-wires. Try it. I am so persuaded that I

am right that I will pay half the expense if you will allow me to direct

the operations.”

“Nay, I am well able to afford the cost; for the rest, allow me to write

to you.”

About ten days afterward I received a letter from Mr. J——, telling me

that he had visited the house since I had seen him; that he had found

the two letters I had described replaced in the drawer from which I had

taken them; that he had read them with misgivings like my own; that he

had instituted a cautious inquiry about the woman to whom I rightly

conjectured they had been written.

It seemed that thirty-six years ago (a year before the date of the

letters) she had married, against the wish of her relatives, an American

of very suspicious character; in fact, he was generally believed to have

been a pirate. She herself was the daughter of very respectable

tradespeople, and had served in the capacity of nursery governess before

her marriage. She had a brother, a widower, who was considered wealthy,

and who had one child about six years old. A month after the marriage

the body of this brother was found in the Thames, near London Bridge;

there seemed some marks of violence about his throat, but they were not

deemed sufficient to warrant the inquest in any other verdict than that

of “found drowned.”

The American and his wife took charge of the little boy, the deceased

brother having by his will left his sister the guardian of his only

child, and in the event of the child’s death the sister inherited. The

child died about six months afterward; it was supposed to have been

neglected and ill-treated. The neighbors deposed to have heard it shriek

at night.

The surgeon who had examined it after death said that it was emaciated

as if from want of nourishment, and the body was covered with livid

bruises. It seemed that one winter night the child had sought to escape;

had crept out into the back-yard, tried to scale the wall, fallen back

exhausted, and had been found at morning on the stones in a dying state.

But though there was some evidence of cruelty, there was none of murder;

and the aunt and her husband had sought to palliate cruelty by alleging

the exceeding stubbornness and perversity of the child, who was declared

to be half-witted. Be that as it may, at the orphan’s death the aunt

inherited her brother’s fortune.

Before the first wedded year was out, the American quitted England

abruptly, and never returned to it. He obtained a cruising vessel, which

was lost in the Atlantic two years afterward. The widow was left in

affluence; but reverses of various kinds had befallen her; a bank broke,

an investment failed, she went into a small business and became

insolvent, then she entered into service, sinking lower and lower, from

housekeeper down to maid-of-all-work, never long retaining a place,

though nothing peculiar against her character was ever alleged.

She was considered sober, honest, and peculiarly quiet in her ways;

still nothing prospered with her. And so she had dropped into the

workhouse, from which Mr. J—— had taken her, to be placed in charge of

the very house which she had rented as mistress in the first year of her

wedded life.

Mr. J—— added that he had passed an hour alone in the unfurnished room

which I had urged him to destroy, and that his impressions of dread

while there were so great, though he had neither heard nor seen

anything, that he was eager to have the walls bared and the floors

removed, as I had suggested. He had engaged persons for the work, and

would commence any day I would name.

The day was accordingly fixed. I repaired to the haunted house; we went

into the blind, dreary room, took up the skirting, and then the floors.

Under the rafters, covered with rubbish, was found a trapdoor, quite

large enough to admit a man. It was closely nailed down with clamps and

rivets of iron. On removing these we descended into a room below, the

existence of which had never been suspected.

In this room there had been a window and a flue, but they had been

bricked over, evidently for many years. By the help of candles we

examined this place; It still retained some moldering furniture—three

chairs, an oak settee, a table—all of the fashion of about eighty years

ago.

There was a chest of drawers against the wall, in which we found, half

rotted away, old-fashioned articles of a man’s dress, such as might have

been worn eighty or a hundred years ago, by a gentleman of some rank;

costly steel buckles and buttons, like those yet worn in court-dresses,

a handsome court-sword; in a waistcoat which had once been rich with

gold-lace, but which was now blackened and foul with damp, we found five

guineas, a few silver coins, and an ivory ticket, probably for some

place of entertainment long since passed away.

But our main discovery was in a kind of iron safe fixed to the wall, the

lock of which it cost us much trouble to get picked.

In this safe were three shelves and two small drawers. Ranged on the

shelves were several small bottles of crystal, hermetically stopped.

They contained colorless volatile essences, of what nature I shall say

no more than that they were not poisons; phosphor and ammonia entered

into some of them. There were also some very curious glass tubes, and a

small pointed rod of iron, with a large lump of rock crystal, and

another of amber, also a lodestone of great power.

In one of the drawers we found a miniature portrait set in gold, and

retaining the freshness of its colors most remarkably, considering the

length of time it had probably been there. The portrait was that of a

man who might be somewhat advanced in middle life, perhaps forty-seven

or forty-eight.

It was a most peculiar face, a most impressive face. If you could fancy

some mighty serpent transformed into man, preserving in the human

lineaments the old serpent type, you would have a better idea of that

countenance than long descriptions can convey; the width and flatness of

frontal, the tapering elegance of contour, disguising the strength of

the deadly jaw; the long, large, terrible eye, glittering and green as

the emerald, and withal a certain ruthless calm, as if from the

consciousness of an immense power.

The strange thing was this: the instant I saw the miniature I recognized

a startling likeness to one of the rarest portraits in the world; the

portrait of a man of rank only below that of royalty, who in his own day

had made a considerable noise. History says little or nothing of him;

but search the correspondence of his contemporaries, and you find

reference to his wild daring, his bold profligacy, his restless spirit,

his taste for the occult sciences.

While still in the meridian of life he died and was buried, so say the

chronicles, in a foreign land. He died in time to escape the grasp of

the law; for he was accused of crimes which would have given him to the

headsman. After his death the portraits of him, which had been numerous,

for he had been a munificent encourager of art, were bought up and

destroyed, it was supposed by his heirs, who might have been glad could

they have razed his very name from their splendid line.

He had enjoyed vast wealth; a large portion of this was believed to have

been embezzled by a favorite astrologer or soothsayer; at all events, it

had unaccountably vanished at the time of his death. One portrait alone

of him was supposed to have escaped the general destruction; I had seen

it in the house of a collector some months before. It had made on me a

wonderful impression, as it does on all who behold it—a face never to be

forgotten; and there was that face in the miniature that lay within my

hand. True that in the miniature the man was a few years older than in

the portrait I had seen, or than the original was even at the time of

his death. But a few years!—why, between the date in which flourished

that direful noble and the date in which the miniature was evidently

painted there was an interval of more than two centuries. While I was

thus gazing, silent and wondering, Mr. J—— said:

“But is it possible? I have known this man.”

“How? where?” cried I.

“In India. He was high in the confidence of the Rajah of ——, and

well-nigh drew him into a revolt which would have lost the Rajah his

dominions. The man was a Frenchman; his name De V——; clever, bold,

lawless; we insisted on his dismissal and banishment. It must be the

same man, no two faces like his, yet this miniature seems nearly a

hundred years old.”

Mechanically I turned round the miniature to examine the back of it, and

on the back was engraved a pentacle; in the middle of the pentacle a

ladder, and the third step of the ladder was formed by the date 1765.

Examining still more minutely, I detected a spring; this, on being

pressed, opened the back of the miniature as a lid.

Within-side the lid were engraved: “Mariana, to thee. Be faithful in

life and in death to ——.”

Here follows a name that I will not mention, but it was not unfamiliar

to me. I had heard it spoken of by old men in my childhood as the name

borne by a dazzling charlatan, who had made a great sensation in London

for a year or so, and had fled the country on the charge of a double

murder within his own house—that of his mistress and his rival. I said

nothing of this to Mr. J——, to whom reluctantly I resigned the

miniature.

We had found no difficulty in opening the first drawer within the iron

safe; we found great difficulty in opening the second: it was not

locked, but it resisted all efforts, till we inserted in the chinks the

edge of a chisel. When we had thus drawn it forth we found a very

singular apparatus, in the nicest order.

Upon a small, thin book, or rather tablet, was placed a saucer of

crystal; this saucer was filled with a clear liquid; on that liquid

floated a kind of compass, with a needle shifting rapidly round; but

instead of the usual points of a compass, were seven strange characters,

not very unlike those used by astrologers to denote the planets.

A very peculiar, but not strong nor displeasing odor came from this

drawer, which was lined with a wood that we afterward discovered to be

hazel. Whatever the cause of this odor, it produced a material effect on

the nerves. We all felt it, even the two workmen who were in the room; a

creeping, tingling sensation, from the tips of the fingers to the roots

of the hair.

Impatient to examine the tablet, I removed the saucer. As I did so, the

needle of the compass went round and round with exceeding swiftness, and

I felt a shock that ran through my whole frame, so that I dropped the

saucer on the floor. The liquid was spilt, the saucer was broken, the

compass rolled to the end of the room, and at that instant the walls

shook to and fro as it a giant had swayed and rocked them.

The two workmen were so frightened that they ran up the ladder by which

we had descended from the trapdoor; but, seeing that nothing more

happened, they were easily induced to return.

Meanwhile I had opened the tablet; it was bound in plain red leather,

with a silver clasp; it contained but one sheet of thick vellum, and on

that sheet were inscribed, within a double pentacle, words in old

monkish Latin, which are literally to be translated thus:

On all that it can reach within these walls, sentient or inanimate,

living or dead, as moves the needle, so works my will! Accursed be the

house, and restless the dwellers therein.

We found no more. Mr. J—— burned the tablet and its anathema. He razed

to the foundation the part of the building containing the secret room,

with the chamber over it. He had then the courage to inhabit the house

himself for a month, and a quieter, better conditioned house could not

be found in all London. Subsequently he let it to advantage, and his

tenant has made no complaints.

But my story is not yet done. A few days after Mr. J—— had removed into

the house, I paid him a visit. We were standing by the open window and

conversing. A van containing some articles of furniture which he was

moving from his former house was at the door.

I had just urged on him my theory that all those phenomena regarded as

supermundane had emanated from a human brain; adducing the charm, or

rather curse we had found and destroyed, in support of my theory.

Mr. J—— was observing in reply, “that even if mesmerism, or whatever

analogous power it might be called, could really thus work in the

absence of the operator, and produce effects so extraordinary, still

could those effects continue when the operator himself was dead? and if

the spell had been wrought, and, indeed, the room walled up, more than

seventy years ago, the probability was that the operator had long since

departed this life”—Mr. J——, I say, was thus answering, when I caught

hold of his arm and pointed to the street below.

A well-dressed man had crossed from the opposite side, and was accosting

the carrier in charge of the van. His face, as he stood, was exactly

fronting our window. It was the face of the miniature we had discovered;

it was the face of the portrait of the noble three centuries ago.

“Good heavens!” cried Mr. J——; “that is the face of De V——, and scarcely

a day older than when I saw it in the Rajah’s court in my youth!”

Seized by the same thought, we both hastened down-stairs; I was first in

the street, but the man had already gone. I caught sight of him,

however, not many yards in advance, and in another moment I was by his

side.

I had resolved to speak to him, but when I looked into his face I felt

as if it were impossible to do so. That eye—the eye of the serpent—fixed

and held me spellbound. And withal, about the man’s whole person there

was a dignity, an air of pride and station and superiority that would

have made any one, habituated to the usages of the world, hesitate long

before venturing upon a liberty or impertinence.

And what could I say? What was it I could ask?

Thus ashamed of my first impulse, I fell a few paces back, still,

however, following the stranger, undecided what else to do. Meanwhile he

turned the corner of the street; a plain carriage was in waiting with a

servant out of livery, dressed like a _valet de place_, at the carriage

door. In another moment he had stepped into the carriage, and it drove

off. I returned to the house.

Mr. J—— was still at the street-door. He had asked the carrier what the

stranger had said to him.

“Merely asked whom that house now belonged to.”

The same evening I happened to go with a friend to a place in town

called the Cosmopolitan Club, a place open to men of all countries, all

opinions, all degrees. One orders one’s coffee, smokes one’s cigar. One

is always sure to meet agreeable, sometimes remarkable persons.

I had not been two minutes in the room before I beheld at table,

conversing with an acquaintance of mine, whom I will designate by the

initial G——, the man, the original of the miniature. He was now without

his hat, and the likeness was yet more startling, only I observed that

while he was conversing there was less severity in the countenance;

there was even a smile, though a very quiet and very cold one. The

dignity of mien I had acknowledged in the street was also more striking;

a dignity akin to that which invests some prince of the East, conveying

the idea of supreme indifference and habitual, indisputable, indolent

but resistless power.

G—— soon after left the stranger, who then took up a scientific journal,

which seemed to absorb his attention.

The scrap book, Volume 2, No. 2 · 第 177 / 198 题