CHAPTER XXIII.

MORE PUBLIC WORK.

For the co-operative movement I had always felt the keenest sympathy. I

saw in it the liberation of the small wage-earner from the toils of the

middlemen. I thought moreover that the incentive to thrift so strongly

encouraged by co-operative societies would be a tremendous gain to the

community as well as to the individual. How many people owe a

comfortable old age to the delight of seeing their first small profits

in a co-operative concern, or their savings in a building society

accumulating steadily and surely, if but slowly? And I have always had

a disposition to encourage anything that would tend to lighten the

burden of the worker. So that when in 1901 Mrs. Agnes Milne placed

before me a suggestion for the formation of a women's co-operative

clothing factory, I was glad to do what I could to further an extension

in South Australia of the movement, which, from its inception in older

countries, had made so strong an appeal to my reason. A band of women

workers were prepared to associate for the mutual benefit of the

operatives in the shirtmaking and clothing trades. Under the title of

the South Australian Co-operative Clothing Company, Limited, they

proposed to take over and carry on a small private factory, owned by

one of themselves, which had found it difficult to compete against

large firms working with the latest machinery. I was sure of finding

many sympathizers among my friends, and was successful in disposing of

a fair number of shares. The movement had already gained support from

thinking working women, and by the time we were ready to form ourselves

into a company we were hopeful of success. I was appointed, and have

since remained the first President of the board of directors; and,

unless prevented by illness or absence from the State, I have never

failed to be present at all meetings. The introduction of Wages Boards

added to the keen competition between merchants, had made the task of

carrying on successfully most difficult, but we hoped that as the idea

gained publicity we should benefit proportionately. It was a great blow

to us, when at the close of the first year we were able to declare a

dividend of 1/ a share, the merchants closed down upon us and reduced

their payments by 6d. or 9d. per dozen. But in spite of drawbacks we

have maintained the struggle successfully, though sometimes at

disheartening cost to the workers and officials of the society. I feel,

however, that the reward of success due to this plucky band of women

workers will come in the near future, for at no other time probably has

the position looked more hopeful than during the present year.

During this same year the Effective Voting League made a new departure

in its propaganda work by inviting Sir Edward Braddon to address a

meeting in the Adelaide Town Hall. As Premier of Tasmania, Sir Edward

had inaugurated the reform in the gallant little island State, and he

was able to speak with authority on the practicability and the justice

of effective voting. His visit was followed a year later by one from

Sr. Keating, another enthusiastic Tasmanian supporter, whose lecture

inspired South Australian workers to even greater efforts, and carried

conviction to the minds of many waverers. At that meeting we first

introduced the successful method of explanation by means of limelight

slides. The idea of explaining the whole system by pictures had seemed

impossible, but every step of the counting can be shown so simply and

clearly by this means as to make an understanding of the system a

certainty. To the majority of people an appeal to reason and

understanding is made much more easily through the eye than through the

ear. The year 1902 saw an advance in the Parliamentary agitation of the

reform, when the Hon. Joseph (now Senator) Vardon introduced a Bill for

the first time into the Legislative Council. The measure had been

excellently prepared by Mr. J. H. Vaughan, LL.B., with the assistance

of the members of the executive of the Effective Voting League, among

whom were Messrs. Crawford Vaughan and E. A. Anstey. The Bill sought to

apply effective voting to existing electoral districts, which, though

not nearly so satisfactory as larger districts, nevertheless made the

application of effective voting possible. With the enlargement of the

district on the alteration of the Constitution subsequent to federation

becoming an accomplished fact, the league was unanimous in its desire

to seek the line of least resistance by avoiding a change in the

Constitution that an alteration in electoral boundaries would have

necessitated.

To Mr. Vardon, when he was a candidate for Legislative honours in 1900

the usual questions were sent from the league; but, as he had not

studied the question he declined to pledge himself to support the

reform. Realizing, however, the necessity of enquiring into all public

matters, he decided to study the Hare system, but the league declined

to support him without a written pledge. Still he was elected, and

immediately afterwards studied effective voting, became convinced of

its justice, and has remained a devoted advocate. Our experience with

legislators had usually been of the opposite nature. Pledged adherents

to effective voting during an election campaign, as members they no

longer saw the necessity for a change in a method of voting which had

placed them safely in Parliament; but in Mr. Vardon we found a man

whose conversion to effective voting was a matter of principle, and not

a question of gathering votes. That was why the league selected him as

its Parliamentary advocate when effective voting first took definite

shape in the form of a Bill. When, later, Mr. E. H. Coombe, M.P., took

charge of the Bill in the Assembly although the growth in public

opinion in favour of effective voting had been surprising, the

coalition between the Liberal and Labour parties strengthened their

combined position and weakened the allegiance of their elected members

to a reform which would probably affect their vested interests in the

Legislature. Mr. Coombe had not been an easy convert to proportional

representation. He had attended my first lecture at Gawler, but saw

difficulties in the way of accepting the Hare system as propounded by

me. His experiments were interesting. Assuming a constituency of 100

electors with 10 members, he filled in 60 Conservative and 40 Liberal

voting papers. The proportion of members to each party should be six

Conservatives and four Liberals, and when he found that by no amount of

manipulation could this result be altered he became a convert to

effective voting. His able advocacy of the reform is too well known to

need further reference; but I should like now to thank those members,

including Mr. K. W. Duncan, who have in turn led the crusade for

righteous representation in both Houses of Parliament, for of them may

it truly be said that the interests of the people as a whole were their

first consideration. Before I left for America I saw the growing power

and strength of the Labour Party. I rejoiced that a new star had arisen

in the political firmament. I looked to it as a party that would

support every cause that tended towards righteousness. I expected it,

as a reform party, to take up effective voting, because effective

voting was a reform. I hoped that a party whose motto was "Trust the

people" would have adopted a reform by means of which alone it would be

possible for the people to gain control over its Legislature and its

Government. Alas! for human hopes that depend on parties for their

realization! As time after time I have seen defections from the ranks

of proportionalists, and people have said to me:--"Give it up, Miss

Spence. Why trouble longer? Human nature is too bad," I have answered,

"No; these politicians are but the ephemeral creations of a day or a

month, or a year; this reform is for all time, and must prevail, and I

will never give it up."

During my many visits to Melbourne and Sydney I had been much impressed

with the influence and the power for good of the local branches of the

world-famed National Council of Women. I had long hoped for the

establishment of a branch in South Australia, and was delighted to fall

in with a suggestion made by the Countess of Aberdeen

(Vice-President-at-large of the International Council), through Lady

Cockburn, that a council should be formed in South Australia. The

inaugural meeting in September, 1902, was splendidly attended, and it

was on a resolution moved by me that the council came into existence.

Lady Way was the first President, and I was one of the Vice-Presidents.

I gave several addresses, and in 1904 contributed a paper on

"Epileptics." In dealing with this subject I owed much to the splendid

help I received from my dear friend Miss Alice Henry, of Victoria, now

in Chicago, whose writings on epileptics and weak-minded children have

contributed largely to the awakening of the public conscience to a

sense of duty towards these social weaklings. In 1905 I contributed a

paper to the quinquennial meeting of the International Council of

Women, held at Berlin, on the laws relating to women and children in

South Australia, and gave an account of the philanthropic institutions

of the State, with special reference to the State Children's Council

and Juvenile Courts. The work of the National Council in this State was

disappointing to many earnest women, who had hoped to find in it a

means for the social, political, and philanthropic education of the

women of South Australia. Had the council been formed before we had

obtained the vote there would probably have been more cohesion and a

greater sustained effort to make it a useful body. But as it was there

was so apparent a disinclination to touch "live" subjects that interest

in the meetings dwindled, and in 1906 I resigned my position on the

executive in order to have more time to spare for other public work.

A problem which was occasioning the State Children's Council much

anxious thought was how to deal effectively with the ever-increasing

number of the "children of the streets". Boys and girls alike, who

should either be at school or engaged at some useful occupation, were

roaming the streets and parks, uncontrolled and sometimes

uncontrollable. We recognised that their condition was one of moral

peril, and graduation to criminality from these nurseries of crime so

frequently occurred that State interference seemed absolutely

imperative to save the neglected unfortunates for a worthier

citizenship. It is much easier and far more economical to save the

child than to punish the criminal. One of the most effective means of

clearing the streets would be to raise the compulsory age for school

attendance up to the time of employment. That truancy was to a great

extent responsible for these juvenile delinquents was proved by the

fact that more then one-half of the lads sent to Magill had committed

the crimes for which they were first convicted while truanting.

Moreover, an improvement was noticed immediately on the amendment of

the compulsory attendance clauses in the Education Act. Truancy--the

wicket gate of the road to ruin in youth--should be barred as

effectively as possible, and the best way to bar it is to make every

day a compulsory school day, unless the excuse for absence be

abundantly sufficient. Another aspect of the neglected children

problem, which Federal action alone will solve, is in dealing with

cases of neglect by desertion. At present each State is put to great

trouble and expense through defaulting parents. Federal legislation

would render it possible to have an order for payment made in one State

collected and remitted by an officer in another State. By this means

thousands of pounds a year could be saved to the various States, and

many a child prevented from becoming a burden to the people at large.

These are some of the problems awaiting solution and the women of South

Australia will do well to make the salvation of these neglected waifs a

personal care and responsibility. Perhaps no other work of the State

Children's Council has more practically shown their appreciation of the

capabilities of the children under their care than the establishment of

the State children's advancement fund. This is to enable State children

who show any aptitude, to pursue their education through the

continuation schools to the University. To private subscriptions for

this purpose the Government have added a subsidy of 50 pounds, and

already some children are availing themselves of this splendid

opportunity to rise in the world. The longer I live the prouder I feel

that I have been enabled to assist in this splendid work for the

benefit of humanity.

The years as they passed left me with wider interests in, deeper

sympathies with, and greater knowledge of the world and its people.

Each year found "one thing worth beginning, one thread of life worth

spinning." The pleasure I derived from the more extended intellectual

activity of my later years was due largely to my association with a

band of cultured and earnest women interested in social, political, and

other public questions--women who, seeing "the tides of things,"

desired so to direct them that each wave of progress should carry the

people to a higher place on the sands of life. To the outside world

little is known of the beginnings and endings of social movements,

which, taken separately, perhaps appear of small consequence, but which

in the aggregate count for a great deal in what is popularly known as

the forward movement. To such as these belonged an interesting

association of women, which, meeting at first informally, grew

eventually into a useful organization for the intellectual and moral

development of those who were fortunate enough to be associated with

it. This was the "Social Students' Society," of which Miss A. L.

Tomkinson was the secretary and I the first President. One of the

addresses I gave was on "Education," and among others whose addresses

helped us considerably was the Director of Education (Mr. A. Williams).

Speakers from all parties addressed the association, and while the

society existed a good deal of educational work was done. Much interest

was taken in the question of public playgrounds for children, and we

succeeded in interesting the City Council in the movement; but, owing

to lack of funds, the scheme for the time being was left in abeyance.

In the agitation for the public ownership of the tramways, I was glad

to take a share. The private ownership of monopolies is indefensible,

and my American experiences of the injustice of the system strengthened

my resolve to do my utmost to prevent the growth of the evil in South

Australia. My attitude on the question alienated a number of friends,

both from me personally and from effective voting, so intolerant had

people become of any opposition to their own opinions. The result of

the referendum was disappointing, and, I shall always consider, a grave

reflection on a democratic community which permits a referendum to be

taken under a system of plural voting which makes the whole proceeding

a farce. But the citizens of Adelaide have need to be grateful to the

patriotic zeal of those who, led by the late Cornelius Proud fought for

the public ownership of the tramways.

These years of activity were crossed by sickness and sorrow. For the

first time in a long life, which had already extended almost a decade

beyond the allotted span, I became seriously ill. To be thus laid low

by sickness was a deep affliction to one of my active temperament; but,

if sickness brings trouble, it often brings joy in the tender care and

appreciation of hosts of friends, and this joy I realized to the

fullest extent. The following year (1904) was darkened by the tragic

death of my ward, and once more my home was broken up, and with Miss

Gregory I went to live with my good friends Mr. and Mrs. Quilty, in

North Norwood. From then on my life has flowed easily and pleasantly,

marred only by the sadness of farewells of many old friends and

comrades on my life's journey, who one by one have passed "through

Nature to eternity."

Much as I have written during the past 40 years, it was reserved for my

old age to discover within me the power of poetical expression. I had

rhymed in my youth and translated French verse, but until I wrote my

one sonnet, poetry had been an untried field. The one-sided pessimistic

pictures that Australian poets and writers present are false in the

impression they make on the outside world and on ourselves. They lead

us to forget the beauty and the brightness of the world we live in.

What we need is, as Matthew Arnold says of life, "to see Australia

steadily and see it whole." It is not wise to allow the "deadbeat"--the

remittance man, the gaunt shepherd with his starving flocks and herds,

the free selector on an arid patch, the drink shanty where the

rouseabouts and shearers knock down their cheques, the race meeting

where high and low, rich and poor, are filled with the gambler's ill

luck--fill the foreground of the picture of Australian life. These

reflections led me to a protest, in the form of a sonnet published in

The Register some years ago:--

When will some new Australian poet rise

To all the height and glory of his theme?

Nor on the sombre side for ever dream

Our hare, baked plains, our pitiless blue skies,

'Neath which the haggard bushman strains his eyes

To find some waterhole or hidden stream

To save himself and flocks in want extreme!

This is not all Australia! Let us prize

Our grand inheritance! Had sunny Greece

More light, more glow, more freedom, or more mirth?

Ours are wide vistas bathed in purest air--

Youth's outdoor pleasures, Age's indoor peace--

Where could we find a fairer home on earth

Which we ourselves are free to make more fair?

Just as years before my interest had been kindled in the establishment

of our system of State education, and later in the University and

higher education, so more recently has the inauguration of the Froebel

system of kindergarten training appealed most strongly to my reason and

judgment. There was a time in the history of education, long after the

necessity for expert teaching in primary and secondary schools had been

recognised, when the training of the infant mind was left to the least

skilled assistant on the staff of a school. With the late Mr. J. A.

Hartley, whose theory was that the earliest beginnings of education

needed even greater skill in the teacher than the higher branches, I

had long regarded the policy as mistaken; but modern educationists have

changed all that, and the training of tiny mites of two or three

summers and upwards is regarded as of equal importance with that of

children of a larger growth. South Australia owes its free kindergarten

to the personal initiative and private munificence of the Rev. Bertram

Hawker, youngest son of the late Hon. G. C. Hawker. I had already met,

and admired the kindergarten work of, Miss Newton when in Sydney, and

was delighted when she accepted Mr. Hawker's invitation to inaugurate

the system in Adelaide. Indeed, the time of her stay here during

September, 1905, might well have been regarded as a special visitation

of educational experts, for, in addition to Miss Newton, the directors

of education from New South Wales and Victoria (Messrs. G. H. Knibbs

and F. Tate) took part in the celebrations. Many interesting meetings

led up to the formation of the Kindergarten Union. My niece, Mrs. J. P.

Morice, was appointed hon. secretary, and I became one of the

Vice-Presidents. On joining the union I was proud of the fact that I

was the first member to pay a subscription. The free kindergarten has

come to South Australia to stay, and is fast growing into an integral

part of our system of education. I have rejoiced in the progress of the

movement, and feel that the future will witness the realization of my

ideal of a ladder that will reach from the kindergarten to the

University, as outlined in articles I wrote for The Register at that

time.

An Autobiography(#4220) · 第 23 / 24 章