Civil Disobedience

We are on the eve of Mahatma Gandhi undertaking an important part of his

programme by starting Civil Disobedience in a district in Surat. It is

very difficult to offer any useful comment on this undertaking because

beyond the general lines, his programme in its detail is not yet before

the Country. We can only hope that the resistance to law will not be so

undertaken as to be widely interpreted as a sort of charter for general

lawlessness. That would be a catastrophe for which the country is not

prepared. This seems also to be Mr. Gandhi's opinion, for he has very

prudently circumscribed the practice of the resistance with very severe

restrictions, involving a moral and economic preparation. To disobey

specific orders of Government or their officials, which have no moral

sanction behind them or are illegal in their inception, is a

comparatively easy matter, fraught with no far-reaching harm to the

community. The disobedience, in such a case commands the moral approval

of the civilised community, and ends only by affecting the prestige of

the promulgator of the order. But when a campaign is undertaken

involving a wholesale and general defiance of order and authority,

forces may arise, which, in the hands of inexperienced and enthusiastic

associates or partisans, may reach extreme limits, involving the

community in chaos, disorder and possibly violence. The country has had

only a year's training in his (Mr. Gandhi) counsels of non-violent

resistance--far too short a period for his countrymen to imbibe his

spirit, in a manner worthy of his teaching. May we, therefore, hope that

in launching on this undertaking he will seriously consider this aspect

of the case? We shall of course, watch his experiment but with concern

and solicitude, feeling secure in the hope, created by his magnificent

personality, that in his hands the destinies of the country are

perfectly safe.

Gandhi and Anarchy · 第 66 / 136 题