From this point of view "Trinity Sunday" is the most important poem in

the book. It records an experience which the mystic of another age would

have called a revelation, and which he would have apprehended through

the medium of religious emotion. But this poet attains to her ultimate

vision through the phenomena of the real world, apprehended in terms of

the ideal. The warm breath of Spring, rich with scent and sound of the

teeming earth, stirs it to awakening. But though she is walking in

familiar Cambridge with, characteristically, the scene and time exactly

placed: though friendly faces pass and cordial voices give a greeting,

all that suddenly shrivels at the touch of the wild earth spirit. Space

and time curl away in fold after fold; and with them pass successive

forms of strange life immensely remote. But even while reality thus

terribly unfolds, it is perceived to be the _stuff of the world's live

brain_; to have existence only in idea.

And the fens were not. (For fens are dreams

Dreamt by a race long dead;

And the earth is naught, and the sun but seems:

And so those who know have said.)

Thus the facts of science have gone to the making of this poem, as well

as the theories of an idealist philosophy. It is through them both that

imagination takes the forward leap. But neither the one nor the other

can avail to utter the revelation; and even the poet's remarkable gift

of expression can only suffice to suggest the awfulness of it.

So veil beyond veil illimitably lifted:

And I saw the world's naked face,

Before, reeling and baffled and blind, I drifted

Back within the bounds of space.

_John Masefield_

There is one sense at least in which Mr Masefield is the most important

figure amongst contemporary poets. For he has won the popular ear, he

has cast the poetic spell further than any of his compeers, and it has

been given to him to lure the multitudinous reader of magazines--that

wary host which is usually stampeded by the sight of a page of verse.

Now I know that there are cultured persons to whom this fact of

uncritical appreciation is an offence, and to them a writer bent upon

purely scientific criticism would be compelled to yield certain points.

But they would be mainly on finicking questions, as an occasional lapse

from fineness in thought or form, an incidental banality of word or

phrase; or a lack of delicate effects of rhyme and metre. And the whole

business would amount in the end to little more than a petulant

complaint; an impertinent grumble that Mr Masefield happens to be

himself and not, let us say, Mr Robert Bridges; that his individual

genius has carved its own channels and that, in effect, the music of the

sea or the mountain torrent does not happen to be the same thing as the

plash of a fountain in a valley.

But having no quarrel with this offending popularity: rejoicing in it

rather, and the new army of poetry-readers which it has created; and

believing it to be an authentic sign of the poetic spirit of our day,

one is tempted to seek for the cause of it. Luckily, there is a poem

called "Biography" which gives a clue and something more. It is a pæan

of zest for life, of the intense joy in actual living which seems to be

the dynamic of Mr Masefield's genius. There is, most conspicuous and

significant, delight in beauty; a swift, keen, accurate response of

sense to the external world, to sea and sky and hill, to field and

flower. But there is fierce delight, too, in toil and danger, in

strenuous action, in desperate struggle with wind and wave, in the

supreme effort of physical power, in health and strength and skill and

freedom and jollity; and above all, first, last and always, in ships.

But there is delight no less in communion with humanity, in comradeship,

in happy memories of kindred, in still happier mental kinships and

intellectual affinities, in books, in 'glittering moments' of spiritual

perception, in the brooding sense of man's long history.

These are the 'golden instants and bright days' which correctly spell

his life, as this poet is careful to emphasize; and we perceive that the

rapture which they inspire in him, the ardour with which he takes this

sea of life, is of the essence of his poetry. It is seen most clearly

in the lyrics; and that is natural, since these are amongst his early

work, and youth is the heyday of joy. It is found in nearly all of them,

of course in varying degree, colouring substance and shaping form,

evoking often a strong rhythm like a hearty voice that sings as it goes.

So hey for the road, the west road, by mill and forge and fold,

Scent of the fern and song of the lark by brook, and field, and

wold;

Or again, in "Tewkesbury Road,"

O, to feel the beat of the rain, and the homely smell of the earth,

Is a tune for the blood to jig to, a joy past power of words;

And the blessed green comely meadows are all a-ripple with mirth

At the noise of the lambs at play and the dear wild cry of the

birds.

And it rings in many songs of the sea, telling of its beauty or terror,

its magic and mystery and hardship, its stately ships and tough

sailor-men and strange harbourages, its breath of romance sharply

tingling with reality, its lure from which there is no escape--

I must go down to the seas again, for the call of the running tide

Is a wild call and a clear call that may not be denied;

And all I ask is a windy day with the white clouds flying,

And the flung spray and the blown spume, and the sea-gulls crying.

Under the wistfulness of that throbs the same zest as that which finds

expression in "Laugh and be Merry"; but the mood has become more

buoyant--

Laugh and be merry, remember, better the world with a song,

Better the world with a blow in the teeth of a wrong.

Laugh, for the time is brief, a thread the length of a span.

Laugh and be proud to belong to the old proud pageant of man.

Sometimes a minor key is struck, as in "Prayer;" but even here the joy

is present, revealing itself in sharp regret for the beloved things of

earth. It manifests itself in many ways, subtler or more obvious; but

mainly I think in a questing, venturous spirit which must always be

daring and seeking something beyond. Whether in the material world or

the spiritual, it is always the same--whether it be sea-longing, or

hunger for the City of God, or a vague faring to an unknown bourne, or

the eternal quest for beauty. The poem called "The Seekers" is

beautifully apt in this regard. Simply, clearly, directly, it expresses

the alpha and omega of this genius: the zest which is its driving force

and the aspiration, the tireless and ceaseless pursuit of an ideal,

which is its objective.

Not for us are content, and quiet, and peace of mind,

For we go seeking a city that we shall never find.

There is no solace on earth for us--for such as we--

Who search for a hidden city that we shall never see.

There is the spirit of adventure, the eternal allure of romance, as old

and as potent as poetry itself. And surely nothing is more engaging,

nothing quicker and stronger and more universal in its appeal, than zest

for life finding expression in this way. In these early lyrics its

spontaneous and simple utterance is very winning; but in the later

narrative poems it is none the less present because, having grown a

little older, it is a little more complex and not so obvious in its

manifestation. Under these longer poems too runs the stream of joy,

somewhat quieter now, perhaps, subdued by contemplation, brought to the

test of actuality, shaping a different form through the conflict of

human will, but still deep and strong, and, as in the earlier work,

expressing its ultimate meaning through the spirit of high adventure.

Thus "The Widow in the Bye Street," which was the first written of these

four narrative poems, is the adventure of motherhood. "Oh!" will protest

some member of the dainty legion which lives in terror of appearances,

"it is a story of lust and murder!" But no; fundamentally, triumphantly,

it is a tale of mother-love, venturing all for the child. Only

superficially is it a tragedy of ungoverned desire and rage, made out of

the incidence of character which we call destiny. The mother's spirit

prevails over all that, and remains unconquerable. In "Daffodil Fields"

there is the adventure of romantic passion. The "Everlasting Mercy," so

obviously as hardly to need the comment, is the high adventure of the

soul; and "Dauber," less clearly perhaps, though quite as certainly, is

that too. But while in the first of these two poems the spirit's spark

is struck into 'absolute human clay,' in "Dauber" it is burning already

in the brain of an artist. Saul Kane, when his soul comes to birth at

the touch of religion, puts off bestiality and rises to a joyful

perception of the meaning of life. The Dauber, with that precious

knowledge already shining within him, but twinned with another, the

supreme and immortal glory of art, with his last breath cries holy

defiance to the elements that snatch his life--_It will go on_.

But there is another reason for the popularity of this poet's work; and

it also is deducible from the poem called "Biography." I mean the

complete and robust humanity which is evinced there. One sees, of

course, that this has a close relation with the zest that we have

already noted; that it is indeed the root of that fine flower. But the

balance of this personality--with power of action and of thought about

equally poised, with the mystic and the humanitarian meeting half-way,

with the ideal and the real twining and intertwining constantly, with

sensuous and spiritual perception almost matched--determines the quality

by which Mr Masefield's poems make so wide and direct an appeal. If

reflectiveness were predominant, if the subjective element outran the

keen dramatic sense, if the ideal were capable of easy victory over the

material (it does conquer, but of that later), this would be poetry of a

very different type. Whether it would be of a finer type it is idle to

speculate, the point for the moment being that it would not command so

large an audience. By just so far as specialization operated, the range

would be made narrower.

It is this sense of humanity which wins; not only explicit, as, for

example, in the deliberate choice of subject avowed once for all in the

early poem called "Consecration"--

The men of the tattered battalion which fights till it dies,

Dazed with the dust of the battle, the din and the cries,

.....

The sailor, the stoker of steamers, the man with the clout,

The chantyman bent at the halliards putting a tune to the shout,

.....

Of the maimed, of the halt and the blind in the rain and the cold--

Of these shall my songs be fashioned, my tales be told.

There the poet is responding consciously to the time-spirit: the

awakening social sense which, moving pitifully amongst bitter and ugly

experience, was to evoke the outer realism of his art. That, of course,

being passionately sincere, is a powerful influence. But stronger still

is the unconscious force of personality, this completeness of nature

which in "Biography" is seen as a rare union of powers that are

nevertheless the common heritage of humanity; and which is implicit

everywhere in his work, imbuing it with the compelling attraction of

large human sympathy.

Out of this arise the curiously contrasted elements of Mr Masefield's

poetry. For, as in life itself, and particularly in life that is full

and sound, there is here a perpetual conflict between opposing forces.

It is, perhaps, the most prominent characteristic of this work. It

pervades it throughout, belongs to its very essence and has moulded its

form. It is, of course, most readily apparent in the poet's art. Here

the battling forces of his genius, transferred to the creatures whom he

has created, have made these narrative poems largely dramatic in form.

Here, too, we come upon a clash of realism with romance and idyllic

sweetness. That bald external realism has found much disfavour with

those who do not or will not see its relation to the underlying reality.

And one observes that the critic who professes most to dislike it

hastens to quote the gaudiest example, practically ignoring the many

serene and gracious passages.

But, putting aside the prejudice which has been fostered by a

conventional poetic language, this realistic method does seem to

conflict with certain other characteristics of the work--with the

essential romance of the spirit of adventure, for instance. There does

at first glance appear to be a disturbing lack of unity between that

ardent, wistful and elusive spirit, and the grim actuality here, of

incident and diction; or, on the other hand, between the raw material of

this verse and its elaborate metrical form, or its frequent passages of

rare and delicate beauty. But is it more than an appearance? I think

not. I believe that the incongruity exists only in a canon of poetical

taste which is false to the extent that it is based too narrowly. That

canon has appropriated romance to a certain order of themes and, almost

as exclusively, to a certain manner of expression. Most of our

contemporary poets have cheerfully repudiated the convention so far as

it governed language; building up, each for himself, a fresh, rich,

expressive idiom in which the magic of romance is often vividly

recreated. Some of them, and Mr Masefield pre-eminently, have gone

further. They have perceived the potential romance of all life, and have

broken down the old limit which prescribed to the poet only graceful

figures and pseudo-heroic themes. They have set themselves to express

the wonder and mystery, the ecstasy and exaltation which inhere, however

obscurely, in the lowliest human existence.

Thus we have Saul Kane, the village wastrel of "The Everlasting Mercy,"

glimpsing his heritage, for a moment, in a lucid interval of a drunken

orgy. Suddenly, for a marvellous instant, he is made aware of beauty,

smitten into consciousness of himself and a fugitive apprehension of

reality.

I opened window wide and leaned

Out of that pigstye of the fiend

And felt a cool wind go like grace

About the sleeping market-place.

The clock struck three, and sweetly, slowly,

The bells chimed Holy, Holy, Holy;

.....

And summat made me think of things.

How long those ticking clocks had gone

From church and chapel, on and on,

Ticking the time out, ticking slow

To men and girls who'd come and go,

.....

And how a change had come. And then

I thought, "You tick to different men."

What with the fight and what with drinking

And being awake alone there thinking,

My mind began to carp and tetter,

"If this life's all, the beasts are better."

The elements of that passage, and cumulatively to its end, are genuinely

romantic: the heightened mood, the night setting of darkness and

solemnity, the wondering and regretful gaze into the past, and the sense

of eternal mystery. So, too, though from a very different aspect, is the

amazing power of the mad scene in this poem. The fierce zest of it

courses along a flaming pathway and is as exhilarating in its speed and

vigour as any romantic masterpiece in the older manner. It is difficult

to quote, in justice to the author, from so closely woven a texture; but

there is a short passage which illustrates over again the physical

development that we have already noted balancing mental and spiritual

qualities in this genius. It is the exultation of Kane in his

swiftness, as he rages through the streets with a crowd toiling after

him.

The men who don't know to the root

The joy of being swift of foot,

Have never known divine and fresh

The glory of the gift of flesh,

Nor felt the feet exult, nor gone

Along a dim road, on and on,

Knowing again the bursting glows,

The mating hare in April knows,

Who tingles to the pads with mirth

At being the swiftest thing on earth.

O, if you want to know delight,

Run naked in an autumn night,

And laugh, as I laughed then....

The sensuous ecstasy of that is as strongly contrasted with the

pensiveness of the previous scene at the window as it is with the gentle

rhapsody which follows the drunkard's conversion. Of that rhapsody what

can one say? It is a piece about which words seem inadequate, or totally

futile. Perhaps one comment may be made, however. Reading it for the

twentieth time, and marvelling once more at the religious emotion which,

in its naïve sweetness and intensity is so strange an apparition in our

day, my mind flew, with a sudden sense of enlightenment, back to

Chaucer. At first, reflection made the transition seem abrupt to

absurdity; but the connexion had no doubt been helped subconsciously by

the apt fragment from Lydgate on the fly-leaf of this poem. Thence it

was but a step to the large humanity, the sympathy and tolerance and

generosity, the wide understanding bred of practical knowledge of men

and affairs, of the father of poets. An actual likeness gleamed which

was at the same time piquant and satisfying. For, first, it stimulated

curiosity regarding the use by this poet of the Chaucerian rhyme-royal

in three of these long poems. That evinces a leaning on traditional form

rather curious in so independent an artist. And then it teased the mind

with suggestions that led out of range--about mental affinities, and the

different manifestations of the same type of genius, born into ages so

far apart.

It is not, of course, a question of exact or direct comparison between,

let us say, the _Canterbury Tales_ and these narrative poems of the

twentieth century. It is rather a matter of the spirit of the whole

work, of the personality and its reaction to life, which satisfy one

individual at least of a resemblance. Of course it is not easily

susceptible of proof; but there are passages from the two poets which in

thought, feeling, and even manner of expression, will almost form a

parallel. Consider this stanza from a minor poem of Chaucer, a prayer

to the Virgin in the quaint form of an "A. B. C."

Xristus, thy sone, that in this world alighte,

Up-on the cros to suffre his passioun,

And eek, that Longius his herte pighte,

And made his herte blood to renne adoun;

And al was this for my salvacioun;

And I to him am fals and eek unkinde,

And yit he wol not my dampnacioun--

This thanke I you, socour of al mankinde.

The childlike faith of that, the quiet rapture of adoration, the abandon

and simple confidence, are curiously matched by the following passage

from "The Everlasting Mercy." Saul Kane has found his soul in the

mystical rebirth of Christianity, and dawn coming across the fields

lightens all his world with new significance.

O Christ who holds the open gate,

O Christ who drives the furrow straight,

O Christ, the plough, O Christ, the laughter

Of holy white birds flying after,

Lo, all my heart's field red and torn,

And Thou wilt bring the young green corn,

The young green corn divinely springing,

The young green corn for ever singing;

And when the field is fresh and fair

Thy blessèd feet shall glitter there.

And we will walk the weeded field,

And tell the golden harvest's yield,

The corn that makes the holy bread

By which the soul of man is fed,

The holy bread, the food unpriced,

Thy everlasting mercy, Christ.

So one might go on to contrast the several characteristics of this

poetry, and to trace them back to the combination of qualities in the

author's genius. This elemental religious emotion, dramatically fitted

as it is to the character, could only have found such expression by a

mind which deeply felt the primary human need of religion, and which was

relatively untroubled by abstract philosophy. But set over against that

is the almost pagan joy in the senses, the vigour and love of action

which make so strong a physical basis to this work; whilst, on the other

hand, there stands the astonishing contrast between the lyrical

intensity of the idyllic passages of these poems; and the dramatic power

(at once identified with humanity and detached from it) which has

created characters of ardent vitality.

There is, of course, a corresponding technical contrast; but the fact

that it does 'correspond' is an answer to the critics who object to the

violence of certain scenes or to a literal rendering here and there of

thought or word. Granted that this poet is not much concerned to polish

or refine his verse, it remains true that the same sense of fitness

which closes three of these tragedies in exquisite serenity, governs

elsewhere an occasional crudity of expression or a touch of banality. It

is largely--though not always--a question of dramatic truth. The medium

is related to the material of this poetry and ruled by its moods. Hence

its realism is not an external or arbitrary thing. It is something more

than a trick of style or the adoption of a literary mode, being indeed a

living form evolved by the reality which the poet has designed to

express.

The root of the matter lies in a stanza of "Dauber." The young

artist-seaman, who is the protagonist here, has for long been patiently

toiling at his art at the prompting of instinct--the æsthetic impulse to

capture and make permanent the beauty of the material world. But the

pressure of reality upon him, the unimaginable hardships of a sailor's

existence, have threatened to crush his spirit. A crisis of physical

fear and depression has supervened; terror of the storms that the ship

must soon encounter, of the frightful peril of his work aloft, and of

the brutality of his shipmates, has shaken him to the soul. For a

moment, even his art is obscured, shrouded and almost lost in the whirl

of these overmastering realities. But when it emerges from the chaos it

brings revelation to the painter of its own inviolable relation with

those same realities.

... a thought occurred

Within the painter's brain like a bright bird:

That this, and so much like it, of man's toil,

Compassed by naked manhood in strange places,

Was all heroic, but outside the coil

Within which modern art gleams or grimaces;

That if he drew that line of sailors' faces

Sweating the sail, their passionate play and change,

It would be new, and wonderful, and strange.

That that was what his work meant; it would be

A training in new vision....

One might almost accept that as Mr Masefield's own confession of

artistic faith; it only needs the substitution of the word 'poet' for

the word 'painter' in the second line. But it is not quite complete as

it stands; and an important article of it will be discovered by reading

this poem through and noting the triumph of the ideal over the real,

which is the essential meaning of the work. It is not the most obvious

interpretation, perhaps. The idealist broken by the elements, wasted and

thrown aside, is hardly a victorious figure on the face of things. But,

in spite of that, the poem is a song of victory--of spirit over matter,

of the ideal over reality, of art over life.

The fact is all the more remarkable when we turn for a moment to note

the poet's grip on facts. We have just seen that profound sense of

reality lying at the base of his technical realism; and it has been won,

through a comprehensive experience, by virtue of the balance of his

equipment. There is no bias here, of mind or spirit, which would have

changed the clear humanity of the poet into the philosopher or the

mystic. The naïveté and simple concrete imagery in the expression of

religious feeling are far removed from mysticism. And, on the other

hand, one cannot conceive of Mr Masefield formally ranged with the

abstractions of either the materialist or the idealist school. Yet it is

true that "Dauber" raises the practical issue between the two; and

because the poet has realized life profoundly and dares to tell the

truth about it, the triumph of the ideal is the more complete. He shows

his hero scourged by the elements until all sense is lost but that of

physical torture--

... below

He caught one giddy glimpsing of the deck

Filled with white water, as though heaped with snow.

... all was an icy blast.

Roaring from nether hell and filled with ice,

Roaring and crashing on the jerking stage,

An utter bridle given to utter vice,

Limitless power mad with endless rage

Withering the soul;

With greater daring still we are shown the spirit itself, cowering in

temporary defeat before material force--

"This is the end," he muttered, "come at last!

I've got to go aloft, facing this cold.

I can't. I can't. I'll never keep my hold.

... I'm a failure. All

My life has been a failure. They were right.

.....

Studies of Contemporary Poets · 第 9 / 15 段