VI.

Of the first Baronet’s eldest son, Sir John Clerk, second Baronet, and

one of the Barons of Exchequer, several portraits are preserved at

Penicuik; but even a more complete picture of this stout old gentleman,

perhaps the most potent and memorable figure that appears in this

family history, may be gathered from the voluminous diaries in his

hand that are preserved in the Charter-room, and from that “History of

my Life,” which he himself compiled from these, and which the present

Baronet has placed at the disposal of the Scottish History Society for

publication; a manuscript affording a clear narrative of the events of

the Baron’s life, and throwing curious and valuable side-lights upon

the manners and public occurrences of the time, while, in almost every

line of its pages, it gives a vivid, if unconscious, picture of the

quaint, masterful personality of its writer.

He was born, as he tells us, on the 8th of February 1676—not in

1684, as stated by his biographers; studied at Penicuik School and

Glasgow University; and, at the age of nineteen, went to Leyden to

be instructed in law by “a very learned man, Philippus Bernardus

Vitrianus.” Here he boarded with a German who taught mathematics,

philosophy, and music, and he applied himself to all of these studies

as well as to law, having previously, as he remarks with proper pride,

“played tolerably on the harpsicord, and since I was 7 I touched the

violin a little.” Nor do these exhaust the list of his pursuits, for

“among other things I learned to draw from Francis Miers, a very great

painter; this proceeded partly from inclination, and partly from the

advice I had from some of my Dutch friends, for all their young Folks

learn to draw from their being 7 years of Age, and find it vastly

useful in most Stations of Life.” His great friend at Leyden was Herman

Boerhaave, then a man of twenty-six, afterwards world-famous as a

physician, and he gives a curious account of his being treated by the

young doctor with a “chymecal medicine he had discovered which would

carry off the smallpox before they came any length,” and which was

successful at the time, though the malady returned in full force three

months afterwards, when Clerk had gone to Rome. “We not only lived like

brothers while I studied in Leyden, but continued a correspondence

together while he lived”; and forty-four years afterwards Boerhaave

bequeathed to the Baron a collection of his books, which still forms

part of the Library at Penicuik House.

After leaving Leyden Clerk visited Germany, Italy, France, and

Flanders, and the two large MS. volumes of his “Travels” during this

period—not only descriptive of the various places that he saw, and

very particularly of the antiquities of Rome, but also giving an

account of the laws manners, and customs of the several countries that

he visited—prove how diligent and observant the youth had been during

the whole time. At the end of these volumes he sums up the results of

his residence abroad, as follows:—

“_N.B._—My improvements abroad were these:

“I had studied the civil Law for three Winters at Leyden, and did not

neglect it at home, by which means I passed Advocate, by a privat and

publick examination some months after my return, with great ease and

some credite.

“I spoke French and Italian very well, but particularly Dutch,

having come very young into Holland, and kept more in the Company of

Hollanders than those of my own country.

“I had applied much to classical learning, and had more than ordinary

inclination for Greek and Roman Antiquities.

“I understood pictures better than became my Purse, and as to Musick

I ... performed better, especially on the Herpsicord, than became a

gentleman.

“This, to the best of my knowledge, is a faithful account of myself.”

The volumes are illustrated with over fifty drawings of the landscapes,

buildings, statues, etc., which he had seen during his travels, “a few

of many hundreds executed while I was abroad.”

In 1702 he was elected member for Whithorn in Galloway, which he

represented till 1707; and his “History” contains curious particulars

of the last sittings of the Scottish Parliament, and personal

references to the prominent political figures of the period,—to the

Duke of Queensberry, the Duke of Argyll, the Marquis of Tweeddale, the

Earl of Stair, Robert Dundas, second Lord Arniston, and Fletcher of

Salton—“a man of republican principles,” “a little untoward in temper,

and much inclined to Eloquence.” In 1706-7, through the influence of

the Duke of Queensberry, his first wife’s cousin, and the Duke of

Argyll, he was appointed a Commissioner for the Union; and in the

following year he became one of the Barons of the newly constituted

Court of Exchequer in Scotland.

From this period till his death on the 4th of October 1755, his life

was occupied with his official duties; with planting and improving

his various estates; with the classical studies to which he continued

faithful all his days; with the composition of various learned

pamphlets, several of which have been published—his “Historical

View of the Forms and Powers of the Court of Exchequer in Scotland,”

written in conjunction with Baron Scrope, having been edited by Sir

Henry Jardine in 1820; in the enjoyment of the society of his friend

Allan Ramsay, the poet; and in correspondence with Roger Gale, and

with Alexander Gordon, in the subscription list of whose “Itinerarium

Septentrionale” he is entered for “five books,” in company with such

well-known names as “Mr. Adams, Architect”; “The Right Hon. Duncan

Forbes, Lord Advocate of Scotland”; “James Gibbs, Esq., Architect”;

“The Right Hon. The Lord Lovat”; “Richard Mead, M.D.”; “The Hon. Sir

Hans Sloane, Bart.”; and “Mr. John Smibert,” the portrait-painter.

Gordon styles him “not only a treasure of learning and good taste, but

now one of its chief supports in that country,” and pronounces that

“among all the collections of Roman antiquities in Scotland, that of

Baron Clerk claims the preference, both as to number and curiosity.”

It was one of the Baron’s antiquarian experiences at a supposed Roman

camp on his property of Dumcrieff, in Dumfriesshire, which, narrated

to Scott by his son, John Clerk of Eldin, suggested the episode of the

“Prætorium” in “The Antiquary.”

Occasionally across the quiet and characteristic pages that narrate

his daily doings there falls the shadow of larger national events: of

the Rebellion of 1715,—“The Earl of Mar was not only my acquaintance

but my particular friend”; of the South Sea Scheme, in connection with

which Clerk held stock, and was a consequent sufferer; and of the

Rebellion of 1745, when the Highlanders in occupation of Edinburgh

visited Penicuik House, demanding food and drink.

As a poet—or, at least, a rhymester—the Baron is known by the really

vigorous verses which he added to the single surviving stanza of the

old Scotch song

“O merry may the maid be

That marries the miller,”

which will be found in Johnston’s “Musical Museum,” but were first

published anonymously, in 1751, in “The Charmer”; and by the lines

beginning

“Harmonious pipe, how I envye thy bliss

When pressed to Sylphia’s lips with gentle kiss,”

which he sent, screwed up in a flute to Susanna Kennedy, afterwards the

celebrated Countess of Eglintoune, to whom Allan Ramsay dedicated his

“Gentle Shepherd,” and of whom Clerk was a lover in his youth, at the

time when, as he tells us, he suffered from his father’s “attempts” to

find him a wife, and especially to wed him to a lady—whose name he

honourably suppresses—“not to my taste, and indeed it was happy for me

to have stopt short in this amour, for she proved the most disagreeable

woman I ever knew, tho’ otherways a wise enough country woman.” There

also exist in MS. “Some Poetical Ejeculations on the Death of my dear

wife, Lady Margaret Stuart,” that “choice of my own,” who became his

first wife, “a very handsome woman, for the most part bred up in

Galloway, a stranger to the follies of Edinburgh,” “the best Woman that

ever breathed Life.”

The earliest of the portraits of the Baron preserved at Penicuik House

hangs in the dressing-room of the present Baronet. It is a small,

carefully finished pencil-drawing; an interesting memorial of Sir

John’s student days at Leyden. The figure is portrayed to the waist,

clad in a loose gown, and with a voluminous cravat wrapped round the

neck. The hands are not shown. The hair is long and curling. The face

full, beardless, and youthful, set in three-quarters to the right,

is modelled with excellent thoroughness, and very crisp and incisive

in the touches that express the lips and the dimple at the corner

of the mouth. The background is dark to the left, and to the right

appears a wall decorated with pilasters. The drawing is inscribed on

the background “Ætatis 19,” and beneath “My picture done at Leyden,

Jo. Clerk”; while on the back is written “My picture done at Leyden by

Francis Miris,” the two latter inscriptions being in the handwriting of

the Baron himself.

A comparison of the dates leads to some dubiety as to who was the

actual draughtsman of this portrait. There were three well-known Dutch

painters of the name of Mieris—Frans Van Mieris, the pupil of Gerard

Dow, born at Delft in 1635, died at Leyden 1681; Willem Van Mieris, his

son, born at Leyden 1662, and died there, 1747; and his son, Frans Van

Mieris, the younger, born at Leyden 1689, died there in 1763. The year

in which the drawing was executed must have been 1695, consequently it

cannot be the work of the elder Frans; nor can it have been done by

his grandson, the younger Frans, who was then only six years of age.

A solution of the difficulty seems to be afforded by a comparison of

the “Travels” and the “History” of the Baron. In the former, a journal

written at the time, he states that he was instructed in art at Leyden,

by “Miris,” but in the latter, compiled from the former many years

afterwards, he states that “Francis Miers, a very great painter,”

was his teacher, the Christian name being apparently added from

memory, which, in the present case, seems to have played him false.

There can be little doubt that the portrait was drawn by Willem Van

Mieris, who at the time of Clerk’s residence at Leyden was forty-one

years of age, and in full practice as an artist. As corroborating

this supposition, we may notice that in the account of the Clerks of

Penicuik contributed by Miss Isabella Clerk to the “Life of Professor

James Clerk Maxwell,” and “chiefly derived from a book of autograph

letters which was long kept at Glenlair, and is now in the possession

of Mrs. Maxwell,” it is stated that the Baron was a pupil of _William_

Mieris in drawing; and further, that a drawing of two men’s heads

similar in style to the present portrait, preserved in the Penicuik

Drawing-room, is inscribed in the Baron’s hand, “Originall by William

Van Miris, 1696,” indicating that about the date he must have been in

communication with this artist.

Three oil portraits, showing the Baron in later life, hang in the

Dining-room. In the first, by Sir John Medina, he appears still as

a young man, seen to the waist, clad in a bright blue coat and a

crimson cloak—a combination of primary colours in which the painter

frequently indulged. His right hand is laid on a book, which rests on

an unseen table in front to the right. He wears a long yellowish wig,

with powdered curls, and the blue eyes and the alert mouth are full

of activity and energy. Probably this portrait was executed at the

time of his marriage, in 1700, for there is a companion picture of his

first wife, Margaret Stewart, daughter of the third Earl of Galloway,

and grand-daughter of James, Earl of Queensberry, painted by Aikman.

As was to be expected in so early a work of the artist’s—he must have

been under twenty when he painted it, for the lady died in 1701—this

latter is full of faults, stiff in pose, with little suggestion of the

figure under the draperies of white and blue: still it conveys the idea

of a charming and attractive personality, fitting as that of the lady

for whom the Baron—as shown in the “History of his Life,”—mourned so

truly.

There is a second bust-portrait of the Baron by Sir John Medina, a

low-toned picture, executed with care if with considerable hardness.

Here the costume is a lilac gown, with a long curled wig, and a

white cravat; the body seen turned to the right, and the face in

three-quarters to the left.

The finest, however, of the portraits of the second Baronet, is

the three-quarters length by his cousin, William Aikman. Here he

appears robed in his black gown as Baron of the Exchequer, worn over

a yellow-brown coat. Long white hanging bands appear at the breast,

and lace ruffles at the wrists; and the grave face, with its strongly

marked features, is surmounted by a long curled wig. His left hand

hangs down in front fingering among the folds of his gown, and the

right rests upon a red-covered table. The whole is relieved against a

plain brown background, with a low-toned space of crimson curtain to

the left. It is an excellent example by the painter, well arranged,

dignified, firmly handled, and manifestly faithful to the personality

portrayed. A bust-portrait similar in costume and wig to this one, but

with some difference in the features, was engraved, in line, by D.

Lizars, “from a portrait in the possession of John Clerk of Eldin, Esq.”

Of Sir James, the third Baronet, the architect of the present house of

Penicuik, we, unfortunately find no adequate portrait. The only effigy

of him that is here preserved is a small silhouette in white paper,

relieved against a black background, marked as cut two years after his

death by Barbara Clerk, his fifth sister, and as being considered very

like by those who knew him. It shows a small face, looking a little

downwards, with a high forehead, beneath the wig, impending over the

delicate features. (_See_ Note at page 69.)

In the Dining-room there hangs another picture by Aikman, marked in the

Baron’s writing, “My eldest son, John Clerk, by Lady Margaret Stuart,

born 1701, died 1722, painted by Mr. Aikman.” The figure is seen nearly

to the waist; the costume, a long curled grey wig, and a lilac-grey

gown, lined with blue. The small eyes are of a blue colour; the face

pale, refined, and delicate-looking. This was “the most accomplish’d

Son,” of “bright aspiring mind,” whose birth cost the life of the

Baron’s first wife, and whose own death, some twenty-one years later,

was mourned by Ramsay in the verses addressed to the bereaved father,

which may be read in his works. On another wall hang three pictures,

portraying, in pairs, the Baron’s six daughters by his second wife.

Near the portrait of his son is a half-length by Aikman, rather hard

in execution, showing a gentleman, with face turned to the left, in

a purple-grey coat, the end of his white cravat being thrust through

one of its button-holes. This is Dr. John Clerk, grandson of the first

Baronet of Penicuik, whose father, Robert Clerk, was a physician in

Edinburgh, and a close friend of Dr. Pitcairn. The son, born 1689,

died 1757, was a personage of greater mark. For above thirty years

he was the most eminent physician in Scotland; on the institution

of the Philosophical Society of Edinburgh in 1739, he was elected a

Vice-President, an office which he held till his death; and from 1740

to 1744, he was President of the Royal College of Physicians, in whose

Hall in Edinburgh another smaller portrait of him is preserved. He

purchased the lands of Listonshiels and Spittal in Mid-Lothian, and

founded the family of the Clerks of Listonshiels. His name appears in

the list of subscribers to the collection of Ramsay’s poems, published

in 1721, and he is believed to have contributed songs to the “Tea-table

Miscellany.” The portrait of his second son, Colonel Robert Clerk, in a

red military uniform, is also preserved in the Penicuik Dining-room.

Two other works by Aikman may here be mentioned, two drawings in red

chalk upon blue paper, which hang in a passage near the Library door.

They evince more of an ideal aim than any other of the productions of

this painter with which we are acquainted. Evidently they are companion

works, and the female portrait is dated 1730, the year before the

artist’s death. This shows a girl’s head in profile to the left, a

young attractive little face, with the faintest half-smile playing

round the tiny mouth, and the short hair decorated with a chaplet of

leaves, or of leaf-like ribbons. It is a portrait of Jean Clerk, the

Baron’s third daughter, who married James Smollet of Bonhill, one of

the Commissaries of Edinburgh.

The other drawing shows a male face in three-quarters to the right,

with flowing hair over the shoulders, and a heroic expression on the

high-arched brows, the raised eyes, and the rippling lips; the dress

thrown carelessly open at the throat. This is Patrick Clerk, the

Baron’s third son. His life-record is a brief one, as given in the

Baronage along with that of three of his brothers: “Patrick, Henry,

Matthew, and Adam, died abroad, in the service of their country.” We

learn from the Baron’s MS. that he died at Carthagena in 1744.

Notes on the Art Treasures at Penicuik House Midlothian · 第 8 / 21 题