CHAPTER IV.

ARMED AMERICA NEEDS A SOLDIER.

The Second Continental Congress convened on the tenth day of May, 1775.

On the same day, Ethan Allen captured Ticonderoga, also securing two

hundred cannon which were afterwards used in the siege of Boston. Prompt

measures were at once taken by Congress for the purchase and manufacture

of both cannon and powder. The emission of two millions of Spanish

milled dollars was authorized, and twelve Colonies were pledged for the

redemption of Bills of Credit, then directed to be issued. At the later,

September, session, the Georgia delegates took their seats, and made the

action of the Colonies unanimous.

A formal system of “Rules and Articles of War” was adopted, and

provision was made for organizing a military force fully adequate to

meet such additional troops as England might despatch to the support of

General Gage. Further than this, all proposed enforcement by the British

crown of the offensive Acts of Parliament, was declared to be

“unconstitutional, oppressive, and cruel.”

Meanwhile, the various New England armies were scattered in separate

groups, or cantonments, about the City of Boston, with all the daily

incidents of petty warfare which attach to opposing armies within

striking distance, when battle action has not yet reached its desirable

opportunity. And yet, a state of war had been so far recognized that an

exchange of prisoners was effected as early as the sixth day of June.

General Howe made the first move toward open hostilities by a tender of

pardon to all offenders against the Crown except Samuel Adams and John

Hancock; and followed up this ostentatious and absurd proclamation by a

formal declaration of Martial Law.

The Continental Congress as promptly responded, by adopting the militia

about Boston, as “The American Continental Army.”

On the fourteenth day of June, a Light Infantry organization of expert

riflemen was authorized, and its companies were assigned to various

Colonies for enlistment and immediate detail for service about Boston.

On the fifteenth day of June, 1775, Congress authorized the

appointment, and then appointed George Washington, of Virginia, as

“Commander-in-Chief of the forces raised, or to be raised, in defence

of American Liberties.” On presenting their commission to Washington

it was accompanied by a copy of a Resolution unanimously adopted by

that body, “That they would maintain and assist him, and adhere to

him, with their lives and fortunes, in the cause of American Liberty.”

It is certain from the events above outlined, which preceded the

Revolutionary struggle, that when Washington received this spontaneous

and unanimous appointment, he understood definitely that the Colonies

were substantially united in the prosecution of war, at whatever cost of

men and money; that military men of early service and large experience

could be placed in the field; that the cause was one of intrinsic right;

and that the best intellects, as well as the most patriotic statesmen,

of all sections, were ready, unreservedly, to submit their destinies to

the fate of the impending struggle. He had been upon committees on the

State of Public Affairs; was constantly consulted as to developments, at

home and abroad; was familiar with the dissensions among British

statesmen; and had substantial reasons for that sublime faith in

ultimate victory which never for one hour failed him in the darkness of

the protracted struggle. He also understood that not statesmen alone,

preëminently Lord Dartmouth, but the best soldiers of Great Britain had

regarded the military occupation of Boston, where the Revolutionary

sentiment was most pronounced, and the population more dense as well as

more enlightened, to be a grave military as well as political error. And

yet, as the issue had been forced, it must be met as proffered; and the

one immediate and paramount objective must be the expulsion of the

British garrison and the deliverance of Boston. It will appear, however,

as the narrative develops its incidents, that he never lost sight of the

exposed sea-coast cities to the southward, nor of that royalist element

which so largely controlled certain aristocratic portions of New York,

New Jersey, and the southern cities, which largely depended upon trade

with Great Britain and the West Indies for their independent fortunes

and their right royal style of living. Neither did he fail to realize

that delay in the siege of Boston, however unavoidable, was dangerous to

the rapid prosecution of general war upon a truly military plan of

speedy accomplishment.

His first duty was therefore with his immediate command, and the hour

had arrived for the consolidation of the various Colonial armies into

one compact, disciplined, and effective force, to battle with the best

troops of Great Britain which now garrisoned Boston and controlled its

waters.

Reënforcements under Howe, Clinton, and Burgoyne had already increased

the strength of that garrison to nearly ten thousand men. It had become

impatient of confinement, and restive under the presence of increasing

but ill-armed adversaries who eagerly challenged every picket post, and

begrudged every market product smuggled, or snatched, by the purveyors

or officers and soldiers of the Crown. Besides all this, the garrison

began to realize the fate which afterwards befell that of Clinton in

Philadelphia, in the demoralization and loss of discipline which ever

attach to an idle army when enclosed within city limits. When Burgoyne

landed at Boston, to support Gage, he contemptuously spoke of “ten

thousand _peasants_ who kept the King’s troops shut up.” Gradually, the

_peasants_ encroached upon the outposts. An offensive movement to occupy

Charlestown Heights and menace the Colonial headquarters at Cambridge,

with a view to more decisive action against their maturing strength, had

been planned and was ready for execution. It was postponed, as of easy

accomplishment at leisure; but the breaking morning of June 17, 1775,

revealed the same Heights to be in possession of the “peasant” militia

of America.

The Battle of Bunker Hill followed. Each force engaged lost one-third of

its numbers, but the aggregate of the British loss was more than double

that of the Colonies. It made a plain issue between the Colonists and

the British army, and was no longer a controversy of citizens with the

civil authority. The impatience of the two armies to have a fight had

been gratified, and when Franklin was advised of the facts, and of the

nerve with which so small a detachment of American militia had faced and

almost vanquished three times their number of British veterans, he

exclaimed, “The King has lost his Colonies.”

Many of the officers who bore part in that determining action gained new

laurels in later years. Prescott, who led his thousand men to that

achievement, served with no less gallantry in New York. Stark, so plucky

and persistent along the Mystic river, was afterwards as brave and

dashing at Trenton, Bennington, and Springfield. And Seth Warner, a

volunteer at Bunker Hill, and comrade of Allen in the capture of

Ticonderoga, participated in the battles of Hubbardton and Bennington,

and the Saratoga campaign, during the invasion of Burgoyne in 1777.

Of the British participants, or spectators, a word is due. Clinton,

destined to be Washington’s chief antagonist, had urged General Howe to

attack Washington’s army at Cambridge, before it could mature into a

well equipped and well disciplined force. He was overruled by General

Howe, who with all his scientific qualities as a soldier, never, in his

entire military career, was quick to follow up an advantage once

acquired; and soon after, the junior officer was transferred to another

field of service.

Percy, gallant in the action of June 17th, was destined to serve with

credit at Long Island, White Plains, Brandywine, and Newport.

Rawdon, then a lieutenant, who gallantly stormed the redoubt on Breed’s

Hill, and received in his arms the body of his captain, Harris, of the

British 5th Infantry, was destined to win reputation at Camden and

Hobkirk’s Hill, but close his military career in America as a prisoner

of war to the French.

The British retained and fortified Bunker Hill, and the time had arrived

for more systematic American operations, and the presence of the

Commander-in-Chief.

Congress had appointed the following general officers as Washington’s

associates in conduct of the war.

_Major-Generals._

Some of these have been already noticed.

ARTEMAS WARD.

CHARLES LEE, a retired officer of the British Army, a military

adventurer under many flags, a resident of Virginia, an acquaintance of

Washington, and ambitious to be first in command.

PHILIP SCHUYLER, then a member of Congress; a man of rare excellence of

character, who had served in the French and Indian War, and took part in

Abercrombie’s Ticonderoga campaign.

ISRAEL PUTNAM.

_Brigadier-Generals._

SETH POMEROY.

RICHARD MONTGOMERY, who served gallantly under Wolfe before Quebec, in

1759, and in the West Indies, in 1762.

DAVID WOOSTER.

WILLIAM HEATH, who, previous to the war, was a vigorous writer upon the

necessity of military discipline and a thoroughly organized militia.

JOSEPH SPENCER, of Connecticut, also a soldier of the French and Indian

War, both as Major and Lieutenant-Colonel.

JOHN THOMAS, also a soldier of the French and Indian War, and in command

of a regiment at Cambridge, recruited by himself.

JOHN SULLIVAN, a lawyer of New Hampshire, of Irish blood; a member of

the First Continental Congress, and quick in sympathy with the first

movement for armed resistance to British rule.

NATHANIEL GREENE, already in command of the Rhode Island troops.

Congress had also selected as Adjutant-General of the Army, HORATIO

GATES, of Virginia, who, like Lee, had served in the British regular

army; commanded a company in the Braddock campaign, and gained some

credit for bravery at the capture of Martinique, in the West Indies. He

was also known to Washington, and shared with Lee in aspiration to the

chief command.

If Washington had possessed prophetic vision, even his sublime faith

might have wavered in view of that unfolding future which would leave

none of these general officers by his side at the last conflict of the

opening war.

Ward, somewhat feeble in body, would prove unequal to active service;

lack the military acuteness and discernment which the crisis would

demand, and retire from view with the occupation of Boston.

Lee, so like Arnold in volcanic temper, would be early detached for

other service, in Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, and South Carolina;

would become a prisoner of war at New York; would propose to the British

authorities a plan for destroying the American army; would escape

execution as a British deserter, on exchange; and afterwards, at the

Battle of Monmouth, so nearly realize his suggestion to General Howe, as

to show that his habitual abuse of Congress and his jealousy of his

Commander-in-Chief were insufficiently atoned for by dismissal from the

army, and the privilege of dying in his own bed, unhonored and

unlamented.

Schuyler, devoted to his country, with rare qualities as a gentleman and

with a polish of manner and elegance of carriage that for the time made

him severely unpopular with the staid stock of New England, would serve

with credit in Canada; organize the army which Gates would command at

Saratoga; be supplanted by that officer; retire from service because of

poor health; but ever prove worthy of the confidence and love of his

commander-in-chief. Of him, Chief Justice Kent would draw a pen-picture

of “unselfish devotion, wonderful energy, and executive ability.” Of

him, Daniel Webster would speak, in an august presence, in these terms:

“I was brought up with New England prejudices against him; but I

consider him second only to Washington in the service he rendered to his

country in the War of the Revolution.”

Putnam, who had been conspicuously useful at Bunker Hill, would, because

of Greene’s illness, suddenly succeed that officer in command on Long

Island, without previous knowledge of the works and the surrounding

country; would, feebly and without system, attempt to defend the lines

against Howe’s advance; would serve elsewhere, trusted indeed, but

without battle command, and be remembered as a brave soldier and a good

citizen, but, as a general officer, unequal to the emergencies of field

service.

Pomeroy, brave at Bunker Hill, realizing the responsibilities attending

the consolidation of the army for active campaign duty, would decline

the proffered commission.

Montgomery, would accompany Schuyler to Canada, full of high hope, and

yet discover in the assembled militia such utter want of discipline and

preparation to meet British veterans, as to withhold his resignation

only when his Commander-in-Chief pleaded his own greater disappointments

before Cambridge.

The perspective-glass will catch its final glimpse of Montgomery, when,

after the last bold dash of his life, under the walls of Quebec, his

body is borne to the grave and buried with military honors, by his old

comrade in arms, Sir Guy Carleton, the British general in command.

Wooster, then sixty-four years of age, would join Montgomery at

Montreal; waive his Connecticut rank; serve under his gallant leader; be

recalled from service because unequal to the duties of active command;

would prove faithful and noble wherever he served, and fall, defending

the soil of his native State from Tryon’s invasion, in 1777.

Heath, would supplement his service on the Massachusetts Committee of

Safety by efficient duty at New York, White Plains, and along the

Hudson, ever true as patriot and soldier; but fail to realize in active

service that discipline of men and that perception of the value of

campaign experience which had prompted his literary efforts before he

faced an enemy in battle.

Spencer, would discharge many trusts early in the war, with fidelity,

but without signal ability or success, and transfer his sphere of

patriotic duty to the halls of Congress.

Thomas, would prove efficient in the siege of Boston, and serve in

Canada.

Sullivan, would also enter Canada; become a prisoner of war at Long

Island; be with Washington at White Plains; succeed to the command of

Lee’s division after the capture of that officer; distinguish himself at

Trenton; serve at Brandywine; do gallant service at Germantown; attempt

the capture of Staten Island and of Newport; chastise the Indians of New

York, and resign, to take a seat in Congress.

Greene, would attend his chief in the siege of Boston; fortify Brooklyn

Heights; engage in operations about Forts Washington and Lee; take part

in the battles of Trenton, Princeton, Brandywine, Germantown, Monmouth,

Newport, and Springfield; would then succeed Gates at the south, fight

the battles of Guilford Court-House, Hobkirk Hill, and Eutaw Springs,

and close his life in Georgia, the adopted home of his declining years.

But, during the midsummer of 1775, the beleaguered City of Boston,

astounded by the stolid and bloody resistance to its guardian garrison,

began to measure the cost of loyalty to the King, in preference to

loyalty to country and duty; while the enclosed patriots began to assure

themselves that deliverance was drawing near. Burgoyne, after watching

the battle from Copp’s Hill, in writing to England of this “great

catastrophe,” prepared the Crown for that large demand for troops upon

which he afterwards conditioned his acceptance of a command in America.

The days of waiting for a distinct battle-issue had been fulfilled. The

days of waiting for the consolidation of the armies about Boston, under

one competent guide and master, also passed. Washington had left

Philadelphia and was journeying toward Cambridge.

[Illustration:

WASHINGTON AT FOUR PERIODS OF HIS MILITARY CAREER.

[Etching from H. H. Hall’s Sons’ engraving.]

]

Washington the Soldier · 第 4 / 37 章