PART I.

Transcriber's Notes

Obvious typographical errors have been silently corrected.

Variations in hyphenation have been standardised, but other variations

in spelling, accents and punctuation are as in the original.

There are several very wide tables in the book (e.g. Table A is 16

columns/380 characters wide). These have been divided into blocks

of 3 or 4 columns. The row alignment has been preserved and, where

appropriate. the 1st column repeated for each block.

The Errata and Corrigenda have been implemented, except for the final

item:

_For the words_ evolution _and_ evolved, _read passim in the Botanical

and Zoological parts_, perfection _and_ perfected, _as the text may

require_.

Italics are represented thus _italic_.

* * * * *

THE

RAY SOCIETY.

INSTITUTED MDCCCXLIV.

[Illustration: Portrait of a man, signed W Bagg]

LONDON.

MDCCCXLVII.

ELEMENTS

OF

PHYSIOPHILOSOPHY.

BY

LORENZ OKEN, M.D.

PROFESSOR OF NATURAL HISTORY AT THE UNIVERSITY OF ZÜRICH;

&c. &c.

FROM THE GERMAN

BY

ALFRED TULK,

MEMBER OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND.

LONDON:

PRINTED FOR THE RAY SOCIETY.

MDCCCXLVII.

C. AND J. ADLARD, PRINTERS,

BARTHOLOMEW CLOSE.

"Of all truths relating to phenomena, the most valuable to us are

those which relate to the order of their succession. On a knowledge of

these is founded every reasonable anticipation of future facts, and

whatever power we possess of influencing those facts to our advantage.

Even the laws of geometry are chiefly of practical importance to us as

being a portion of the premises from which the order of the succession

of phenomena may be inferred."

JOHN STUART MILL.

Begun in the autumn of the year 1845, without the cognizance, or

at the suggestion of a single human being, the present Translation

is due to the fact of its original having encountered a somewhat

kindred spirit, and aroused therein the desire to render others

participant, if possible, in the large amount of instruction it is

so well calculated to afford. And now that the work is done, what

remains for the labourer at second-hand to say by way of preamble to

his newly-dressed wares? Had the book been printed within the pale of

a philosophical or physico-theological sect, the Translator's final

duty would have been clearly enough prescribed. Already bound to the

profession of "particular tenets," his main object would be to indulge

in a laudatory but servile abstract of his author's doctrines, or,

if having set out with the expressed intention of illustrating their

bearings upon the state of science past, present, and to come, he would

become so drunk beforehand with the large and unbridled potation of

his creed, as to surprise the casual reader by informing him that such

an intention is useless, for the two stand in direct antithesis to

each other. Examples of this mode of procedure are not wanting at the

present day, whether at home or abroad. They are the produce of that

spirit, which, rife enough in the Middle Ages, has been so graphically

described by Professor Whewell under the title of the "Commentatorial,"

and "whose professed object is to explain, to enforce, to illustrate

doctrines assumed to be true, but not to obtain additional truths or

new generalizations." While from dealings of this character, as being

utterly opposed to the sacred cause of Truth, I turn away with feelings

of repugnance, to which the lessons of some personal experience have

lent their aid, it is not my business, upon the other hand, to

enter the lists of controversy against those who, having neither the

capacity, nor the desire of its cultivation, for the higher walks of

science, delight to dismiss a work of the present kind with some idle

anathema of mysticism or evasive outcry for more facts.

I refrain from essaying to give any condensed formula or outline[A] of

Professor Oken's Physio-philosophy: first, because its leading points

have been already noted in his own prefaces to the German work and

its translation; secondly, because the book will, I trust, best speak

for itself to those who shall come with minds unprejudiced and duly

prepared, each one in his particular department, to its study; and,

lastly, because any such attempt would necessarily involve an amount

of historical and critical details, which must be here superficially

treated and so misplaced. Suffice it to observe, that the present

work stands alone in Germany, as being the most practical application

upon a systematic scale of the principles advanced by Schelling, more

especially in the Mathesis and Ontology; for the concluding part or

Biology stands almost "per se." As such it will form, apart from other

and higher considerations, a readily available introduction to the

writings upon similar subjects of Carus, Steffens, Hegel and others,

and may induce further attempts to render, by translation or history,

the English student familiar with much of what at present is known only

by scattered fragments in journals, or through the medium of reviews.

From what has been said, the reader will be at no loss to discern in

what light the Translator humbly desires to be viewed in reference to

the present work. He rests content with the confident hope that its

pages will be, at least, found eminently suggestive, that new thoughts

will be awakened by facts and their relations being here cast in a

fresh mould, that shall stimulate others in the field of inquiry, and

open paths hitherto untrod. In this he is but expressing the sentiments

of the author himself, and acknowledging what the present time with

its accumulating mass of knowledge presses upon us more and more--the

necessity of work, wherein abstract science and experience, theory

and facts shall advance together, the Ideal in part receiving and

reflecting back with increased lustre the light which it has derived

from the Real or outward semblance of things.

[A] For this the reader may be referred to the 3d vol. of Prof.

Blainville's Hist. des Sciences de l'Organisation; Par. 1845; or better

still, to the sketch (preceded by a view of Schelling's philosophy),

which is given by M. Saint-Agy in the Tome Complémentaire of Cuvier's

Hist. des Sciences Naturelles, 1845. He there rightly observes of

Oken's work, that "pendant les quarante dernières années il n'a presque

paru en Allemagne d'ouvrages d'anatomie, de physiologie, de physique et

de chimie auxquelles elle n'ait servi de base." For what a master-mind

like Oken's is capable of creating, I would especially refer to his

theory of the Cranial Homologies, which has been in our own country

so beautifully carried out, modified, and proved by the extensive

researches of Professor Owen.

Meanwhile, it is with no small amount of diffidence and hesitation

that the present Translation will quit my hands. Hemmed in by a rigid

dialectic terminology upon all sides, I have had difficulties of no

ordinary kind to contend with in adapting a language, composed of such

varied elements as our own, to meet the requisites of general clearness

and conciseness that form so prominent a feature of the German work. If

errors and obscurities exist, the blame, it will be observed, attaches

to myself, not to the distinguished author. Ill-health has conflicted

much with the calmness and repose of mind so indispensable to an

undertaking, at once novel in kind and character to the English reader;

or otherwise, these (my last labours unto any extent as a Translator)

might have been rendered more worthy of the Ray Society and the objects

it has in view.

To those who have kindly afforded me assistance in the progress

of the work, and to the latter body for undertaking it, I here

return many grateful thanks. The Author himself in a letter to the

Translator, dated Jan. 12, 1847, acknowledges the acceptance of his

work by the Society in the following words:--"The intelligence of my

Physio-philosophy having been deemed worthy of translation by so goodly

and enlightened a Society, cannot be otherwise unto me than a source of

delight."[B]

ALFRED TULK.

[B] "Die Nachricht dass meine Naturphilosophie von einer sociferigen

und erleuchteten Gesellschaft der Uebersetzung für würdig erachtet

worden ist, konnte nicht anders als mir Freude gewähren."

AUTHOR'S PREFACE TO THE TRANSLATION.

It is with no readiness or pleasure that I write introductions of any

kind, and usually abstain from doing so, partly because they appear

to me like a kind of apology or makeshift for the author, and partly

because the contents of the book itself should indicate his status or

position. With regard, however, to the history of the work, some few

words are certainly requisite for its Translation.

I wrote the first Edition of 1810 in a kind of inspiration, and on

that account it was not so well arranged as a systematic work ought

to be. Now, although this may appear to have been amended in the

second and third edition, yet still it was not possible for me to

completely attain the object held in view. The book has therefore

remained essentially the same as regards its fundamental principles,

such as those concerning the formation of matter, the protoplasmic

substance (_Schleim-Substanz_) and vesicular form of the organic mass,

the signification and function of the organs, as also the principles

of classification in Minerals, Plants and Animals, so that all this

is consequently as old as the first edition. It is only the empirical

arrangement into series of plants and animals, that has been modified

from time to time in accordance with the scientific elevation of

their several departments, or just as discoveries and anatomical

investigations have increased and rendered some other position of the

objects a matter of necessity. This susceptibility to change will of

course be persistent in the future, although the principles themselves

should continue wholly unchanged; ay, the very stability of the latter

will tend the more to invite the naturalist to the pursuit of empirical

inquiries, by determining beforehand in what direction he is to extend

his point of view, and thus spare himself the trouble of blindly and

laboriously groping about in the dense labyrinth of facts. Such a work

therefore as the present can only approximate completion through the

progress made in science, and each new edition will supply some defect

of its predecessor in the distribution or parcelling out of things.

In the first edition the principle was raised of individual bodies

being alone the object of Natural History, and that in the next place

they are to be arranged according to the combination of their organs or

component parts, and by no means after the division or mere form of a

single organ; that, for example, a special organ or anatomical system

lies as the basis of each Vegetable and Animal class, and that there

must be therefore as many classes, and no more, as there are cardinal

organs present upon which to found them. On that account it was

absolutely necessary first of all to find out these cardinal organs,

and determine their rank; and, in so doing, it was shown that organs

and classes are at bottom of one kind, and that the development by

stages or degrees of the embryo is the antetype of that of the classes;

furthermore, that each class takes its starting-point from below, and

consequently that the classes do not stand simply one above the other,

but fall into a series of mutually parallel ranks. Now it is this

which, along with the doctrine of the infusorio-vesicular form of the

organic mass, and that touching the signification of parts, as to how

e. g. the blossom is the repetition of the vegetable axis or trunk, the

cephalic bones that of the vertebræ, the feet of the branchiæ, and the

maxillæ in turn of the feet, appears to me the cardinal point attained

in my Philosophy of Nature; more especially, because it was these

very doctrines which were first of all, i. e. before all the others,

comprehended and almost universally adopted. The inorganic matters and

activities pass, however, parallel also to the anatomical formations

and functions; and that this is the case too with the spiritual or

psychical functions the philosophy of the future will probably be in

the condition to point out.

The reader will not expect to find that the serial arrangement of

Plants and Animals, with their parallelism, has been in every instance

thoroughly attained. The present is but a sample of how we are to

proceed in our desire of obtaining a Natural system. With such an

attempt one has something to change every year, and I have in the

present translation made some alterations in respect to the Mollusca

and Fishes. In this sense then it is my wish that the book may be

regarded, and accordingly received with its due amount of indulgence.

LORENZ OKEN.

PREFACE.

The first principles of the present work I laid down in my small

pamphlet entitled _Grundriss der Naturphilosophie, der Theorie der

Sinne und der darauf gegrundeten Classification der Thiere_; Frankfurt

bey Eichenberg, 1802, 8vo (out of print). I still abide by the position

there taken, namely, that the Animal Classes are virtually nothing

else than a representation of the sense-organs, and that they must be

arranged in accordance with them. Thus, strictly speaking, there are

only 5 Animal Classes: _Dermatozoa_, or the Invertebrata; _Glossozoa_,

or the Fishes, as being those animals in whom a true tongue makes for

the first time its appearance; _Rhinozoa_, or the Reptiles, wherein the

nose opens for the first time into the mouth and inhales air; _Otozoa_,

or the Birds, in which the ear for the first time opens externally;

_Ophthalmozoa_, or the Thricozoa, in whom all the organs of sense are

present and complete, the eyes being moveable and covered with two

palpebræ or lids. But since all vegetative systems are subordinated

to the tegument or general sense of feeling, the Dermatozoa divide

into just as many or corresponding divisions, which, on account of the

quantity of their contents, may be for the sake of convenience also

termed classes. Thereby 9 classes of the inferior animals originate,

but which, when taken together, have only the worth or value of a

single class. So much by way of explaining the apparent want of

uniformity in the system.

I first advanced the doctrine, that all organic beings originate from

and consist of _vesicles_ or _cells_, in my book upon Generation. (_Die

Zeugung._ Frankfurt bey Wesche, 1805, 8vo.) These vesicles, when singly

detached and regarded in their original process of production, are the

infusorial mass, or the protoplasma (_Ur-Schleim_) from whence all

larger organisms fashion themselves or are evolved. Their production

is therefore nothing else than a regular agglomeration of Infusoria;

not of course of species already elaborated or perfect, but of mucous

vesicles or points in general, which first form themselves by their

union or combination into particular species. This doctrine concerning

the primo-constituent parts of the organic mass is now generally

admitted or recognised, and I need not, therefore, add anything by way

of apology for it or defence.

In mine and Kieser's _Beyträgen zur vergleichenden Zoologie, Anatomie

und Physiologie_; Frankfurt bey Wesche, 1806, 4to, I have shown that

the intestines originate from the umbilical vesicle, and that this

corresponds to the vitellus. It is true _Friedrich Wolf_ had already

discovered it in the chick, but his was only a single instance, and

completely forgotten. I have also discovered it and without knowing

anything about my being anticipated, since it was nowhere taught. But

I have elevated this structure to the light of a general law, and it

is that unto which I may fairly lay claim. In the same essay I have

introduced into the Physiology the Corpora Wolfiana, or Primordial

Kidneys, but, having failed to recognise their signification, any one

who pleases may filch away the credit of their bare detection.

In my Essay: _Ueber die Bedeutung der Schädelknochen_, (Ein Programm

beym Antritt der Professur an der Gesammt-Universität zu Jena; Jena

gedruckt bey Göpfert, 1807, verlegt zu Frankfurt bey Wesche, 4to,) I

have shown that the head is none other than a vertebral column, and

that it consists of four vertebræ, which I have respectively named

Auditory, Maxillary or Lingual, Ocular and Nasal vertebra; I have also

pointed out that the maxillæ are nothing else but repetitions of arms

and feet, the teeth being their nails; all this is carried out more

circumstantially and in detail in the _Isis_, 1817, S. 1204; 1818,

S. 510., 1823. _litt. Anzeigen_ S. 353 und 441. This doctrine was at

first scoffed at and repulsed; finally, when it began to force its way,

several barefaced persons came forward, who would have made out if they

could, that the discovery was achieved long ago. The reader will not

omit to notice that the above essay appeared as my Antritts-Programm,

or Inaugural discourse, upon being appointed Professor at Jena.

In my Essay entitled _Ueber das Universum als Fortsetzung des

Sinnensystems_; Jena bey Frommann, 1808, 4to, I showed that the

Organism is none other than a combination of all the Universe's

activities within a single individual body. This doctrine has led me

to the conviction that World and Organism are one in kind, and do not

stand merely in harmony with each other. From hence was developed my

Mineral, Vegetable and Animal system, as also my philosophical Anatomy

and Physiology.

In my Essay entitled _Erste Ideen zur Theorie des Lichts, der

Finsterniss, der Farben und der Wärme_; Jena bey Frommann, 1808, 4to,

I pointed out, that the Light could be nothing but a polar tension of

the æther, evoked by a central body in antagonism with the planets;

and that the Heat were none other than the motion of this æther. This

doctrine appears to be still in a state of fermentation.

In my Essay entitled _Grundzeichnung des natürlichen Systems der Erze_;

Jena bey Frommann, 1809, 4to, I arranged the Ores for the first time,

_not_ according to the Metals, but agreeably to their _combinations_

with Oxygen, Acids, and Sulphur, and thus into _Oxyden_, _Halden_,

_Glanzen_, and _Gediegenen_. This has imparted to the recent science of

Mineralogy its present aspect or form.

In the first edition of my _Lehrbuch der Naturphilosophie_, 1810

and 1811, I sought to bring these different doctrines into mutual

connexion, and to show, forsooth, that the Mineral, Vegetable, and

Animal classes are not to be arbitrarily arranged in accordance with

single or isolated characters, but to be based upon the cardinal organs

or anatomical systems, from which a firmly established number of

classes must of necessity result; moreover, that each of these classes

commences or takes its starting-point from below, and consequently

that all of them pass parallel to each other. This parallelism is now

pretty generally adopted, at least in England and France, though with

sundry modifications, which, from the principles being overlooked or

neglected, are based at random, and are not therefore to be approved

of. As in chemistry, where the combinations follow a definite numerical

law, so also in Anatomy the organs, in Physiology the functions, and

in Natural History the classes, families and even genera of Minerals,

Plants and Animals, present a similar arithmetical ratio. The genera

are indeed, on account of their great number and arbitrary erection to

the rank whose title they bear, not to be circumscribed or limited in

every case with due propriety, nor brought into their true scientific

place in the system; it is nevertheless possible to render their

parallelism with each other clear, and to prove that they by no means

form a single ascending series. If once the genera of Minerals, Plants

and Animals come to stand correctly opposite each other, a great

advantage will accrue therefrom to the science of Materia Medica; for

corresponding genera will act specifically upon each other.

These principles, which I have now carried out into detail, were

retained in the _second_, and have been also in the _third_ or

present edition of the _Physio-philosophy_, the arrangement and

serial disposition of the natural objects having, with my increase

of knowledge and concomitant views of things, been amended, enlarged

or diminished, as the case might require, especially in the Mineral,

Vegetable and Animal systems. I am very well aware that there is many

an object which does not stand in its right place; but where again is

there a single system in which this is not still more strikingly the

case? We have here dealt only with the restoration of the edifice,

wherein, after years of long and oft-repeated attempts, the furniture

may for the first time be properly distributed, without detriment to

its general bearings or ground plan.

In my _Lehrbuch der Naturgeschichte_, the Mineralogical and Zoological

portions of which are out of print, but the Botanical still to be had

(Weimar, Industrie-Comptoir, 1826), I have arranged for the first

time the genera and species in accordance with the above principles,

and stated everything of vital importance respecting these matters.

This was the first attempt to frame a scientific Natural History, and

one unto which I have remained true in my last work, the _Allgemeine

Naturgeschichte_, the principles whereof I have sought to develop more

distinctly and in detail in the work now before the reader.

Thus then have I prosecuted throughout a long series of years one kind

of principle, and worked hard to perfectionate it upon all sides. Yet,

notwithstanding my endeavour to amass the manifold stores of knowledge

so requisite to an undertaking like this, I could not acquire within

the vast circuit that appertains thereunto, many things which might be

necessary unto a system extending into all matters of detail. This it

is to be hoped the reader will acknowledge, and have forbearance for

the errors, against which every one will stumble who has busied himself

throughout life with a single branch of the natural sciences. Natural

History is not a closed department of human knowledge, but presupposes

numerous other sciences, such as Anatomy, Physiology, Chemistry and

Physics, with even Medicine, Geography and History; so that one must be

content with knowing only the main facts of the same, and relinquishing

the Singular to its special science. The gaps and errors in Natural

History can therefore be filled up or removed only by numerous writers

and in the lapse of time.

CONTENTS.

PAGE

Conception of the Science 1

Division of the Science. Truth.

PART I. MATHESIS 5

Nothing, § 31. Something, § 50.

A. _PNEUMATOGENY_ 13

Primary Act, § 55. Primary Consciousness, § 59. God, § 61.

a. Primary Rest, § 71. b. Time, § 72. Polarity, § 76. Motion,

§ 80. Man, § 93. c. Space, § 108. Point, Line, Surface,

Globe, Rotation.

B. _HYLOGENY_ 35

a. Gravity, § 148. Matter, Æther, Heavenly Bodies. b. Light,

§ 182. c. Heat, § 198. Fire.

PART II. ONTOLOGY 49

A. _COSMOGENY_ ib.

a. Rest, Centre, § 209. Motion, Line, Planets, § 215. c. Form,

§ 231. Planetary System, Comets.

B. _STÖCHIOGENY_ 59

Condensation, § 253. Simple matters, Elements. a. Air § 282.

b. Water, § 294. c. Earth, § 303.

C. _STÖCHIOLOGY_ 68

Functions of the Elements. 1. Functions of the Æther, § 317.

a. Gravity, § 320. b. Light, § 321. Inflexion, Refraction, Reflexion,

Colours, § 354. Colours and Planets, § 379. c. Heat,

§ 385. 2. Function of the Air, § 410. Electrism. 3. Function of

the Water, § 432. Solution. 4. Function of Earth, § 438.

Crystallization.

D. _KINGDOMS OF NATURE_ 95

Individuals, § 463.

FIRST KINGDOM--MINERALS 96

I. _MINERALOGY_, § 474. Division, § 490.

a. Chemical Division 103

b. Genetic Division. Classes 106

Class I. Earth-Earths Earths.

II. Water-Earths Salts.

III. Air-Earths Inflammables.

IV. Fire-Earths Ores.

Table A to face page 120

II. _GEOLOGY_ 121

_I._ Form of the Planet, § 546. Primary Valleys. _II._

Organs of the Planet, § 570.

A. _Earths_ 127

a. Earth Formation--Primary Rocks, § 573. Granite, Gneiss,

Mica-schist, Lamination, Primary Limestone. b. Water-formation,

§ 622. Transition-rocks, Sedimentary or Stratified Rocks,

Stratified Limestone, Petrifactions or Fossil Remains.

c. Air-formation--Trap-rocks, § 681. d. Fire-formation--Volcanic

Rocks, § 690.

B. _Metallic Ores_ 148

a. Metallic Veins, § 693. b. Production of Ore, § 698. c. Poison,

§ 755. d. Magnetism, § 760. e. Earth-magnetism, § 771.

C. _Inflammables_ 166

a. Sulphur, § 801. b. Coal, § 819.

D. _Salts_ 170

a. Salt-periods, § 827. b. Chemism, § 847.

PART III. BIOLOGY 178

A. _ORGANOSOPHY_ ib.

I. _Organogeny._ Galvanism, § 867. Primary Organism, § 882.

Creation of the Organic 184

a. Elementary Body--Protoplasma or Primary Mucus, § 898.

Change. b. Form--Globe, § 926. Primary Vesicle, § 933. Infusoria,

§ 935. Theory of Generation, § 943. c. Processes of the

Organic. 1. Earth-process--Nutrition, § 964.

2. Water-process--Digestion, § 971. 3. Air-process--Respiration,

§ 977. 4. Motion, § 984.

II. _Organognosy_ 197

Division of the Organism, § 933, into Planetary and Cosmic Organism.

Processes of the Cosmic Organism, § 1014. 1. Process of Gravity,

§ 1021. 2. Process of Heat, § 1024. 3. Process of Light, § 1027.

SECOND KINGDOM--VEGETABLE KINGDOM 204

I. _PHYTOGENY_, § 1038.

A. _Planetary Organs_--Vegetable Trunk 206

I. _Tissues_, § 1055. 1. Water-organ--Cellular Tissue, § 1056.

2. Earth-organ--Vascular Tissue, § 1062. 3. Air-organ--Tracheal

Tissue, § 1065.

II. _Anatomical Systems--Sheaths_, § 1075. 1. Tracheal

System--Wood, § 1077. Vascular System--Liber, § 1080. 3. Cellular

System--Bark, § 1084.

III. _Organs--Members_, § 1086. 1. Water-organ--Root, § 1090.

Earth-organ--Stalk, § 1096. 3. Air-organ--Leaves, § 1120.

B. _Æther-Organs_--Thyrsus or Flower 228

1. Floral Envelopes, § 1187. Involucrum, Calyx, Corolla--Numerical

Law, § 1209. Coloration, § 1241. Stamen-filaments, § 1252--Anthers.

2. Pistil, § 1276. Style. 3. Seed, § 1301. 4. Fruit,

§ 1335. Fruit of the Flowerless Plants, § 1346.

II. _PHYTO-PHYSIOLOGY_ 255

I. _Functions of the Trunk._ 1. Facts.

A. Constituent Parts. a. Inorganic Bodies--Elements, § 1364.

b. Organic Bodies, § 1368.

B. Preliminary Events 259

2. Processes 262

A. Cellular Processes, § 1385. Absorption, Evaporation, Digestion.

B. Vascular Processes, § 1399. Conveyance of Sap, Mixture of Sap,

Secretion.

C. Tracheal Processes, § 1411. Inspiration, Nutrition, Oxydation.

Galvanic Process--Sap-motion, § 1443.

II. _Functions of the Floral Organs_ 272

1. Function of the Corolla--Fecundation, § 1454. Irritability.

2. Function of the Ovarium, § 1473. 3. Function of the Seed.

Germination, § 1476. Growth, § 1481. Fall of the Leaf.

III. _PHYTOLOGY_ 279

_Vegetable System_, §§ 1508-1754.

Table B opposite to page 316

THIRD KINGDOM--ANIMAL KINGDOM 318

I. _ZOOGENY_ 318

Anatomy 326

I. _Tissues_ 327

1. Point-tissue--Nervous mass, § 1801. 2. Globe-tissue--Osseous

mass, § 1825. 3. Line-tissue--Muscular mass, § 1835. 4. Vesicular

tissue, § 1846. Integument.

II. _Anatomical Systems or Sheaths_ 338

A. _Vegetative_ 339

1. Intestinal System, § 1878. 2. Cutaneous System, § 1909.

Branchiæ, Tracheæ. 3. Vascular System, § 1926. 4. Sexual

System, § 1999.

B. _Animal Systems_ 356

1. Nervous System, § 2018. Brain, Senses. 2. Osseous System,

§ 2079. Vertebral Number, § 2109. 3. Muscular System, § 2118.

III. _Organs_ 378

A. _Vegetative_ 378

1. Intestinal Organs, § 2158. 2. Vascular Organs, § 2194.

Branchiæ, Lungs, Liver, Spleen, Kidneys. 3. Respiratory Organs,

§ 2246. Coverings, Hairs. 4. Sexual Organs, § 2285. Impregnation,

§ 2315. Urinary Organs, § 2337.

B. _Animal Organs_ 404

1. Osseous Organs--Limbs, § 2370. 2. Muscular Organs, § 2398.

3. Nervous Organs, § 2405--Senses. 1. Vascular Sense--Sense

of Feeling, § 2440. 2. Intestinal Sense--Taste, § 2454. 3. Pulmonic

Sense--Smell, § 2468. 4. Osseo-Muscular Sense--Hearing,

§ 2476. 5. Nervous Sense--Vision, § 2488.

II. _PHYSIOLOGY_ 423

A. _General Functions_ 423

B. _Special Functions_ 425

I. Functions of the Tissues, § 2539--Heat.

II. Functions of the Systems 429

A. Of the Vegetal Systems. 1. Digestion, § 2571. Poisoning.

2. Respiration, § 2639. 3. Circulation, § 2655.

B. Functions of the Animal Systems 442

1. Of the Osseous System, § 2672. 2. Of the Muscular System,

§ 2686. 3. Of the Nervous System, § 2700. Mesmerism, § 2721.

Sleep, § 2736. Periodicity, § 2761.

III. _Functions of the Organs_ 455

1. _Functions of the Encephalic or Brain-Animal_ 456

A. Organs of Motion.

B. Organs of Sensation 458

1. Sense of Feeling, § 2786. Sense of Taste, § 2821. Sense of

Smell, § 2835. Auditory Sense, § 2849. Speech. Sense of

Sight, § 2902.

2. _Functions of the Sexual Animal_ 477

A. Vegetal Sexual Organs--Formation of Urine, § 2934

B. Animal Sexual Organs 480

1. Male Organs, § 2946. 2. Female Parts, § 2952. Mammæ.

Development of the Fruit or Foetus, § 2981. Parallelism of the

Foetus with the Animal Classes, § 3034. Periods of Life, § 3502.

III. _ZOOLOGY_ 494

A. Division into Provinces 501

B. Division into Circles 502

C. Division into Classes 511

First Province, Somatozoa (Rumpfthiere) Splanchnozoa; 511

including the three Circles of Intestinal, Vascular, and

Respiratory Animals, or Protozoa, Conchozoa, and Ancyliozoa;

with their contained Classes up to 568

Metamorphosis of Insects, § 3291. Parallelism, § 3299.

Relationships, § 3301.

Second Province, Cephalozoa, (Kopfthiere); 544

including the two circles of Sarcose and Sense-Animals;

with their contained Classes up to 568

D. Division into Orders and Families 569

Of those included within the Classes of the First Province or

Splanchnozoa;

with their Tabular Co-arrangement up to 614

Of those comprised by the Classes of the Second Province or

Sarcozoa; with their Tabular Co-arrangement up to 653

IV. _PSYCHOLOGY_ 654

A. _Spiritual Functions of the Somato- or Dermatozoa_ 654

B. _Spiritual Functions of the Cephalozoa_ 658

ERRATA AND CORRIGENDA.

Page 4, § 30, _read_ upon the primary proposition of mathematics

or the axiom.

5, § 35, _for_ magnitudes _read_ quantities.

8, § 39, _for_ Manifold _read_ Different.

11, § 49, _l._ 10, _for_ elevating themselves in power,

_read_ becoming suppressed.

§ 50, _l._ 4, dele the second --.

12, _l._ 1, _for_ magnitudes _read_ quantities;

_l._ 5, _for_ -- _read_ 0.

§ 52, _for_ emerged _read_ been evolved out of

nothing, or been produced from it by addition; but it is, &c.

§ 54, _for_ removing _read_ suppressing.

14, § 59, _l._ 8, _for_ posits itself _read_ itself

posits.

16, _for_ presentation _read passim_, representation.

32, § 134, _for_ Disintegrated _read_ Dissevered.

32, § 137, _for_ never _read_ nowhere.

37, § 161, _l._ 7, _for_ it _read_ there.

38, § 164, _for_ inventive _read passim throughout

Part I._ postulate.

39, _l._ 1, _for_ and the axiom is _read_

the axiom being.

44, § 195, _l._ 15, _for_ that it may shine _read_

upon which it shines.

50, § 214, last line, _for_ darker _read_ dark.

59, § 253, _read_ heavy and material.

61, § 269, 1 and 2, _for_ caloric _read_ hydrogen,

_and for_ hydrogen _read_ carbon.

80, § 388, _for_ nitrogen _read_ hydrogen.

112, _l._ 6, _for_ Terpentin _read_ Serpentin;

_l._ 7 from bottom, _for_ Calces _read_

Calcareous earths.

124, § 562, _for_ the recent _read_ new.

139, § 633-4, _for_ disintegrations _read_ dispersions.

159, § 761, _for_ metallic read _magnetic_.

186, § 914, _for_ heat of blood _read_ blood-heat.

209, § 1060, _read_ constantly circulate therein.

213, § 1077, _l._ 6, _for_ but before _read_ and

whereas; _l._ 7, _for_ have _read_ previously,

_and dele_ it has then, _and read_ the appearance is now.

228, § 1161, _read_ has been reproduced _after_ trunk,

_and dele_ being.

249, § 1314, _for_ umbilicus _read_ hilum, _and for_

cause _read_ basis.

307, § 1679, _instead of_ stipaceous _read_ hypogynous.

308, § 1687, _l._ 2, _read_ Stielblumen or Hypogynes.

320, § 1763, _after_ light-æther _read_ from the dead mass, &c.

327, § 1800, _for_ substance, &c., _read_ contents become, &c.

328-9, _for_ Myxozoa _read_ Protozoa, _and for_ Medusæ

_read_ Acalephæ _here and passim_.

330, _l._ 2, _after the word_ radiating _read_ æther.

332, § 1824, _for_ substance _read_ contents, _and_

§ 1827, _for_ substance _read_ mass.

334, § 1837, _read_ upon the middle rate of oxydation.

327, _l._ 5, _transpose the words_ matter _and_ spirit.

345, § 1928, _read_ elemental matter.

346, § 1931, _read_ at certain points, _after_ each other.

354, § 1992, _read_ through the medium of the gills, the water

through that of the intestine, &c.

355, § 2006, _for_ along with _read_ which belong to the

category of.

361, § 2039, _read_ plexus-forming ramules; § 2046, _for_

is imparted _read_ furnishes us, _and for_ by

_read_ with.

362, § 2050, _for_ oesophageal _read_ pharyngeal,

_passim_, _as also_, pharynx _for_ oesophagus.

372, § 2114, _for_ enter into the composition of _read_

appertain to; _and for_ Mammalia _read_ Thricozoa.

376, § 2141, _read_ the bone, the fluid which has been

secreted from it and rigidified.

381, § 2176, _for the last word_ cyst _read_ cyst,

_hic et passim_.

386, § 2211, _read_ bivalve Mollusca, _passim throughout

Zoogeny_.

393, _l._ 1, _read_ exsecernent.

398, § 2313, _read_ Snail-type of organization.

405, § 2371, _read_, or the integument _after_ respiratory

organ.

408, § 2387, _for_ carnivorous _read_ false molars;

_for_ incisor _read_ laniary molar; _for_

premolar _read_ second, _and for_ tuberculous

_read_ third true molar.

493, § 3054, _for_ testaceous Mollusca _read_ Conchozoa

or Shell-animals.

515, § 3170, _for_ stock _read_ trunk.

544, § 3301, _after_ analogy _read_ which at best is but

a word of random definition.

532, § 3256, _read_ pharyngeal or pneumogastric nerves, _to

end of paragraph_. _For the words_ evolution _and_

evolved, _read passim in the Botanical and Zoological parts_,

perfection _and_ perfected, _as the text may require_.

PHYSIO-PHILOSOPHY.

INTRODUCTION.

CONCEPTION OF THE SCIENCE.

1. Philosophy, as the science which embraces the principles of the

universe or world, is only a logical, which may perhaps conduct us to

the real, conception.

2. The universe or world is the reality of mathematical ideas, or, in

simpler language, of mathematics.

3. Philosophy is the recognition of mathematical ideas as constituting

the world, or the repetition of the origin of the world in

consciousness.

4, 5. Spirit is the motion of mathematical ideas. Nature, their

manifestation.

6. The philosophy of Spirit is the representation of the movements of

ideas in consciousness.

7. The philosophy of Nature that of the phenomena or manifestations of

ideas in consciousness.

8. The world consists of two parts: of one apparent, real, or material;

and one non-apparent, ideal, spiritual, in which the material is not

present, or which is naught in relation to the material.

9. There are, accordingly, two parts or divisions of Philosophy, viz.

Pneumato-and Physio-philosophy.

10. Physio-philosophy has to show how, and in accordance indeed with

what laws, the Material took its origin; and, therefore, how something

derived its existence from nothing. It has to portray the first periods

of the world's development from nothing; how the elements and heavenly

bodies originated; in what method by self-evolution into higher and

manifold forms, they separated into minerals, became finally organic,

and in Man attained self-consciousness.

11. Physio-philosophy is, therefore, the generative history of

the world, or, in general terms, the History of Creation, a name

under which it was taught by the most ancient philosophers, viz. as

Cosmogony. From its embracing the universe, it is plainly the Genesis

of Moses.

12. Man is the summit, the crown of nature's development, and must

comprehend everything that has preceded him, even as the fruit includes

within itself all the earlier developed parts of the plant. In a word,

Man must represent the whole world in miniature.

13. Now since in Man are manifested self-consciousness or spirit,

Physio-philosophy has to show that the laws of spirit are not different

from the laws of nature; but that both are transcripts or likenesses of

each other.

14. Physio-and Pneumato-philosophy range, therefore, parallel to each

other.

15. Physio-philosophy, however, holds the first rank,

Pneumato-philosophy the second: the former, therefore, is the ground

and foundation of the latter, for nature is antecedent to the human

spirit.

16. Without Physio-philosophy, therefore, there is no

Pneumato-philosophy, any more than a flower is present without a stem,

or an edifice without foundation.

17. The whole of philosophy depends, consequently, upon the

demonstration of the parallelism that exists between the activities of

Nature and of Spirit.

DIVISION OF THE SCIENCE.

18. It will be shown in the sequel that the Spiritual is antecedent to

nature. Physio-philosophy must, therefore, commence from the spirit.

19. It will also be shown in the sequel that the whole Animal Kingdom,

e. g. is, none other than the representation of the several activities

or organs of Man; naught else than Man disintegrated. In like manner

nature is none other than the representation of the individual

activities of the spirit. As, therefore, Zoology can be termed the

Science of the Conversion of Man into the Animal Kingdom, so may

Physio-philosophy be called the Science of the Conversion of Spirit

into Nature.

20. Physio-philosophy is divisible, therefore, into three parts. The

_first_ of these treats of spirit and its activities; the _second_, of

the individual phenomena, or things of the world; the _third_, of the

continuous operation of spirit in the individual things.

The first division is the doctrine of the _Whole_ (de Toto)--_Mathesis_.

The second, that of _Singulars_ (de Entibus)--_Ontology_.

The third, that of the _Whole in the Singulars_ (de Toto in

Entibus)--_Biology_.

21. The Science of the Whole must divide into two doctrines; into that

of immaterial totalities--_Pneumatogeny_; and into that of material

totalities--_Hylogeny_.

Ontology teaches us the phenomenon of matter. The first phenomenon of

this are the heavenly bodies comprehended by _Cosmogony_; these develop

themselves further, and divide into the elements--_Stochiogeny_.

From these elements the Earth element develops itself still further,

and divides into minerals--_Mineralogy_; these minerals unite into one

collective body, and this is _Geogeny_.

The Whole in Singulars is the living or _Organic_, which again divides

into plants and animals.

Biology, therefore, divides into _Organogeny_, _Phytosophy_ and

_Zoosophy_.

After this division of the subject the question first of all arises,

what is science, provided there is one.

TRUTH.

22. Science is a series of necessarily inter-dependent and consecutive

propositions, which rest upon a certain fundamental proposition.

23. Now, if anything be certain it can only be _one_ in number. If,

then, there be only _one_ certainty, there can also be only _one_

science, from which all the rest must be derived.

24. The Mathematical is certain, and, by virtue of this character, it

stands also alone. Mathematics is the only true science, and thus the

primary science, the Mathesis, or Knowledge simply, as it was called

by the ancients. The fundamental propositions of mathematics must,

therefore, be fundamental propositions for all other sciences also.

25. Physio-philosophy is only a science when it is reducible to, i. e.

can be placed upon an equal footing with, mathematics. Mathematics is

the universal science; so also is Physio-philosophy, although it is

only a part, or rather but a condition of the universe; both are one,

or mutually congruent.

26. Mathematics is, however, a science of mere forms without substance.

Physio-philosophy is, therefore, Mathematics endowed with substance.

27. The substance of Physio-philosophy must be of one kind with the

form of Mathematics.

28. The certainty of mathematical propositions depends upon no

proposition being essentially different from another. Though there may

be much that is diversified or heterogeneous, there is nothing new in

Mathematics.

For to prove a mathematical proposition is to show (or demonstrate)

that it is equivalent, i. e. of the same kind with another proposition.

All mathematical propositions must, consequently, resemble a first

proposition.

29. Physio-philosophy must also show that all its propositions, or that

all things, resemble each other, and, finally, some first proposition

or thing.

30. These natural propositions or natural things must, however,

resemble also mathematical propositions, and depend, after all, upon

the primary proposition of mathematics or the axiom.

Now then comes the question, what is the first principle of

Mathematics?

PART I.

MATHESIS--OF THE WHOLE.

NOTHING.

31. The highest mathematical idea, or the fundamental principle of all

mathematics is the zero = 0.

The whole science of mathematics depends upon zero. Zero alone

determines the value in mathematics.

32. Zero is in itself nothing. Mathematics is based upon nothing, and,

consequently, arises out of nothing.

33. Out of nothing, therefore, it is possible for something to arise,

for mathematics, consisting of propositions, is a something in relation

to 0. Mathematics itself were nothing if it had none other than its

highest principle zero. In order, therefore, that mathematics may

become a real science, it must, in addition to its highest principle,

subdivide into a number of details, namely, first of all into

numbers, and, finally, into propositions. What is tenable in regard

to mathematics must be equally so of all the sciences; they must all

resemble mathematics.

34. The first act towards realization or the becoming something, is an

origination of Many. All reality can, accordingly, manifest itself only

in multiplicity.

That which belongs to the Many is a Definite; this again is a Limited;

the Limited is a Finite. The Finite only is real.

The question now arises, how it happens that mathematics becomes a

multiplicity, or, what is the same thing, a reality, a something.

35. The reality of mathematics consists in the universality of its

quantities; viz. numbers or figures. Every number, and every thing

which belongs to mathematics, can be derived from no other source than

zero.

Mathematical multiplicity, or its reality, must have proceeded,

therefore, out of zero.

36. Zero, however, contains no number and no figure really in itself;

it contains, forsooth, neither 1 nor 2, neither a point nor a line

within itself. The Singulars or details cannot, therefore, reside in

a real, but only an ideal manner in zero; or, in other words, not

_actually_, but only _potentially_. The conditions here are the same

as with all mathematical ideas. We may conceive, e. g., an idea or

definition of a triangle in so general a sense that it shall comprehend

all triangles, without, however, a definite triangle being actually

intended, or without even a triangle actually existing. In order that

the idea of the triangle be realized, it must become a definite, in

other words, an obtuse or an acute triangle. In short, the idea of the

triangle must multiply itself, be self-evolved, or else it is as naught

in reference to mathematics, or only a geometrical zero.

The individual objects or figures of mathematics thus attain existence,

so far only as the idea comprising them emerges out of itself and

assumes an individual character.

It is clear that all individual triangles taken together closely

resemble the ideal triangle, or, to express the same in more general

terms, that the Real is equivalent to the Ideal, that the former

is but the latter which has become dissevered and finite, and that

the aggregate of every Finite is equivalent to the Ideal. This will

probably be rendered still more distinct by the example of ice and

water. The crystals of ice are nothing else than water bounded by

definite lines. So, also, are the Real and Ideal no more different

from each other than ice and water; both of these, as is well known,

are essentially one and the same, and yet are different, the diversity

consisting only in the form. It will be shown in the sequel that

everything which appears to be essentially different from another, is

so only in the form.

The Real and Ideal are one and the same, only under two kinds of form.

The latter is the same under an indefinite, eternal, single form; but

the Real is also the same, yet under the form of quantity, and, as

will be shown, of multiplicity. An infinity resides in both; in the

Real an endlessness of individual forms; in the Ideal but one endless

form; in the latter case an eternity, in the former an infinity. The

quantity and multiplicity of the whole of mathematics is contained in

the same manner in the 0, that the quantity and multiplicity of the

triangles are in the ideal or primary triangle. Mathematics is a system

of nullities or nothings, and this admits of being easily proved.

37. Zero is indeed the universality of mathematics, this, however,

is not real, but only ideal. Every number issues out of zero, like

the multiplicity of the real triangles out of the primary triangle.

This progression of numbers out of zero takes place through a process

of becoming determinate and limited; just as the real triangles are

only definitions of the absolute triangle. The process of becoming

determined is identical with becoming a Finite; becoming real is called

becoming finite. Mathematical singulars or numbers can, therefore, be

nothing else than zero disintegrated, or rendered real by determination.

What zero is in infinite intensity, that are numbers in endless

extensity. Zero is of two forms: under the ideal it is mere intensity;

under the real mere extensity, or a series of numbers. The latter is

only expanded intensity; the former, extensity concentrated on the

point; both are, consequently, one and the same in toto. Numbers are

identical with zero; they are zero in a state of extension, while

zero is equivalent to numbers in a state of intensity. The sense

in which numbers are said to come out of zero is, therefore, very

clear; they have not issued forth from zero as if they had previously

resided individually therein, but the zero has emerged out of itself,

has itself become apparent, and then was it a finite zero, a number.

So, also, does the idea of a circle become a real circle, not from

the latter emerging from the former, but from this itself becoming

manifest. The individual circle is a manifestation or phenomena of the

spiritual circle.

38. All realization, therefore, is not the origin of a something that

has not previously been; it is only a manifestation, a process of

extension taking place in the idea.

Thus the Real does not arise out of the Ideal, but is the Ideal itself

in a condition of definition and limitation, as are, e. g. the actual

triangle or the actual circle. If, then, the Ideal and Real be one,

everything is necessarily identical, and this identity dominates not

merely between the Ideal and Real in a general sense, but between all

individual members of the Real.

39. The identity of every Different, or of all things among themselves

and with the highest unity, is the _essence_ of things. The limitation

or definition of the Ideal is their _form_. Limitation is the

Impartient of form.

40. Limitation is originally only a quantitative relation, e. g. the

size of the angle in a triangle; later on it becomes also a relation of

direction or of position.

In both cases the limitation is only an ideal relation. Realization

also takes place, therefore, only in an ideal manner; and the Real is

therefore ideal, not simply as it regards its _form_, but also its

_essence_. Every Plural resembles itself and the highest principle in

essence; or, in other words, all Singulars are united through essence

with the highest One. All diversity of the Plural resides merely in the

form, limitation or manifestation. The one unchanging essence possesses

one ideal form, which is that of pure unity, and the same essence has

a limitation, a real form, which is that of subdivision. There is only

one essence in all things, the 0, the highest identity; but there are

infinitely numerous forms.

Numbers are naught else than different forms of the one unchangeable

essence, namely, the 0.

If, then, all numbers are only zero in a state of extension, and are

consequently identical with it, the question arises, what are the

first finitings of zero, or as what does it appear when it is no

longer merely ideal or indefinite; in short, what is the first form of

the real zero, or of the essence in general?

ESSENCE OF NOTHING.

41. The ideal zero is absolute unity, or monas; it is not a

singularity, such as one individual thing, or as the number 1; but an

indivisibility, a numberlessness, in which neither 1 nor 2, neither a

line nor a circle can be found; in short, an unity without distinction,

an homogeneity, brightness, or translucency, a pure identity.

42. The mathematical monas is _eternal_. It succumbs to no definitions

of time and space, is neither finite nor infinite, neither great nor

small, neither quiescent nor moved; but it is and it is not all this.

That is the conception of eternity.

Mathematics is thus in possession of an eternal principle.

43. Since all the sciences are equivalent to mathematics, nature must

also possess an eternal principle.

The principle of nature, or of the universe, must be of one and the

same kind with the principle of mathematics. For there cannot be two

kinds of monades, nor of eternities, nor of certainties. The highest

unity of the universe is thus the Eternal. The Eternal is one and

the same with the zero of mathematics. The Eternal and zero are only

denominations differing in accordance with their respective sciences,

but which are essentially one.

44. The Eternal is the _nothing_ of Nature.

As the whole of mathematics emerges out of zero, so must everything

which is a Singular have emerged from the Eternal or nothing of Nature.

The origin of the Singular is nothing else than a manifestation of the

Eternal. Thereby unity, brightness, homogeneity are lost, and converted

into multiplicity, obscurity, diversity.

Unity posited manifoldly is an expansion without termination, but one

that always remains the same.

Realization or manifestation is an expansion of the Eternal.

FORMS OF NOTHING.

45. The first form of the expansion or manifestation of the

mathematical monas, or of 0 is +-. The +-is nothing else than the

definition of 0. 0 is the reduction of the positive and negative series

of numbers, upon which the whole of arithmetic depends. A series of

numbers is, however, nothing else than a repetition of a + 1 or a-1;

consequently, the whole of arithmetic reduces itself to + 1-1.

What, however, is a + 1, or-1? Obviously nothing else than a single +

or-. The figure is quite superfluous, and only indicates how often +

or-has been assumed; instead, therefore, of + 1 we can posit +; instead

of-1 simply-. The series + 1 + 1 + 1 is synonymous with + + +; or

instead of 3 we may posit + + +, and so on for every figure ad libitum.

The figures are nothing more than shorter signs for the two highest

mathematical forms or ideas of numbers. Numbers are nothing different

from the ideas of numbers; they are the latter themselves, only several

times posited. Essentially numbers do not exist, but only their two

ideas. These ideas, however, exist an infinite number of times.

Multiplicity or _real_ infinity is, accordingly, nothing special or

particular, but only an arbitrary repetition of the Ideal, an incessant

positing of the idea. The idea posited is reality, non-posited it is =

0.

46. The first multiplicity is duality, +-. This duality alters nothing

in the essence of the monas, for +-is = 0. It is the monas itself only

under another form. In multiplication it is thus the form alone that

changes.

There are many forms, but not many essences.

47. The first or primary duality is not, however, a double unity, both

members of which are of equal rank, but an antagonism, disunion, or

_diversity_. Many diversities are _multiplicity_. The Many is thus

complex. The first form is not therefore a simple division of zero or

the primary unity, but an antagonistic positing of itself, a becoming

manifold.

48. Every Finite is in the same manner only the self-definition

of the Eternal. The Eternal becomes, accordingly, real, by binary

self-division. When the Eternal is manifested, it is either a positive

or negative. The whole of arithmetic is nothing else than a ceaseless

act of positing and negating, of affirming and denying.

All realization is nothing else than the act of positing and negating.

The act of positing and negating of the Eternal is called realization.

49. Positing and negating is, however, an _act_ or function. Arithmetic

is, therefore, a ceaseless process of acting or performing. Numbers are

_acts_ of the primary idea, or, properly speaking, stationary points

of its function, and hence proceeds a division into the two ideas +

and -. If these remain always alone nothing is added to them. They

alone produce the whole science of arithmetic, and simply because they

are never exhausted by the act of positing themselves repeatedly, but

capable after this of again becoming suppressed. Since + is

in essence nothing else than a simple positing, a mere affirmation,

and-a mere suppression of this affirmation, a negation; so is the

positive unity = 1 nothing but an affirmation once declared, and

the whole series of numbers is a reiterated affirmation. The act of

affirmation alone gives the number, and the latter is thus the definite

quantity devoid of intrinsic value. Bare affirmation alone without

reference to any substance is unity, duality, &c.

SOMETHING.

50. Still, however, there must be something, which is posited and

negatived. The form must have a substance.

This something is the primary idea, or the very Eternal of mathematics,

the zero; for + - is = 0. The + is naught else than zero affirmed;

the - naught else than this + 0 negatived = - 0. Now since an

affirmation once declared is = 1, so are unity and zero identical. Zero

differs only from finite unity in that it is not affirmed.

51. The - is not simply the want of affirmation, but its explicit

abstraction. The + presupposes the 0; the - the + and 0; the 0,

however, presupposes neither + nor-. Purely negative quantities are,

as is known, a nonentity, because they can only bear reference to

positive quantities. The - is, indeed, the retroversion of + into 0; yet

alone, therefore, it is not perfectly equal to 0. It is a retrovertent,

and consequently the second _act_, which presupposes the positive. By

the - we know what is not; the 0 is, however, a nothing in every respect.

The - is the _copula_ between 0 and +.

52. If the + is the 0 posited, so is it a nothing posited or

determined. This position is, however, a number, and therefore a

mathematical something. The nothing thus becomes a something, a Finite,

a Real, through the simple positing of itself, and the something

becomes a nothing by the removal of this self-position. The nothing

itself is, however, the mere neglect of its self-position. The

something, the + -, has consequently not arisen or been evolved out

of nothing, or been produced from it by addition; but it is nothing

itself; the whole undivided nothing has become unity. The nothing

_once_ posited as nothing is = 1. We cannot speak of production or

evolution in this case; but of the complete identity and uniformity of

the nothing with the something; it is a virgin product or birth.

53. Zero _must_ be _endlessly_ positing itself, for in every respect it

is indefinite or unlimited, eternal. The number of finite singularities

must, therefore, pass into the Infinite.

54. The whole of Arithmetic is nothing but the endless repetition of

nothing, an endless positing and suppressing of nothing.

We can become acquainted with nothing but the nothing, for the Original

of our knowledge is the 0.

There is no other science than that which treats of nothing.

Every Real, if it were such in itself, could not be known, because

the possibilities of its properties would pass into the Infinite. The

nothing alone is cognizable, because it has only a single property,

namely, that of having none; concerning which knowledge no doubt can be

entertained.

A.--_PNEUMATOGENY._

PRIMARY ACT.

55. The + - or, in other words, numbers are acts or functions. Zero

is, consequently, the primary act. Zero is, therefore, no _absolute_

nothing, but an act without substratum. Generally speaking there is,

therefore, _no_ nothing; the mathematical nothing is itself an _act_,

consequently a something. The nothing is only postulate.

56. An act devoid of substratum is a spiritual act. Numbers are,

accordingly, not positions and negations of an absolute nothing, but of

a spiritual act.

57. The zero is an eternal act; numbers are repetitions of this eternal

act, or its halting points, like the steps in progression. With zero

the Eternal therefore originates directly, or both are only different

expressions for one and the same act, according with the difference

of the science wherein they are employed. Mathematics designates its

primary act by the name of zero; Philosophy by that of Eternal. It

is an error to believe that numbers were absolute nothings; they are

acts and consequently realities. While numbers in a mathematical sense

are positions and negations of Nothing, in the philosophical they are

positions and negations of the Eternal. Everything which is real,

posited, finite, has become this out of numbers; or, more strictly

speaking, every Real is absolutely nothing else than a number. This

must be the sense entertained of numbers in the Pythagorean doctrine,

namely, that everything or the whole universe had arisen from numbers.

This is not to be taken in merely a quantitative sense, as it has

hitherto been erroneously, but in an intrinsic sense, as implying

that all things are numbers themselves, or the acts of the Eternal.

The essence in numbers is naught else than the Eternal. The Eternal

only is or exists, and nothing else is when a number exists. There

is, therefore, nothing real but the Eternal itself; for every Real,

or everything that is, is only a number and only exists by virtue of

a number. Every Singular is nothing for itself, but the Eternal is in

it, or rather it is itself only the Eternal, though not the Eternal in

itself, but affirmed or negatived. The existence of the Singular is

not its own existence, but only that of the Eternal subjected to an

arbitrary repetition; for the act of being and affirming are of one

kind.

58. The continuance of Being is a continuous positing of the Eternal,

or of nothing, a ceaseless process of becoming real in that which is

not. There exists nothing but nothing, nothing but the Eternal, and all

individual existence is only a fallacious existence. All individual

things are monades, nothings, which have, however, become determined.

The Eternal must posit without cessation, for otherwise it would be an

actual nothing, while in fact it is an act; but it must incessantly

suppress also this position, else it would be only a finite act, or an

act which had only one kind of direction, that of affirmation + + + +,

and so on, which represents only the half of arithmetic. The totality

of the Finite is, therefore, of eternal duration also: the Singular,

however, issues forth and disappears like the numbers in arithmetic.

The eternal duration of the Finite consists, however, only in ceaseless

repetition. Such an Eternal is to be distinguished therefore from the

Primary eternal, and is called the Infinite. The totality of finite

things is not therefore eternal, but only _infinite_.

PRIMARY CONSCIOUSNESS.

59. Two tendencies are present in the primary act, both of which being

inseparable are one in kind. It has the tendency to posit, and also

to suppress, itself. The unity strives unto binary division or to

antagonism, even as the 0 strives to produce + or-. While the primary

act itself posits, it does this indeed out of its own strength, and

that which it posits is also none other than itself; it itself posits

i. e. _actively_; and is itself posited i. e. _passively_; it itself

posits itself, is the self-position of itself; for + is nothing else

than 0 self-posited. The positing and posited act are of one kind; the

latter, however, is the Real, the Finite; the former the Ideal, the

Eternal. Both are distinguished from each other through this only,

that the Real is the posited, numbered, and consequently determined

act; the ideal, however, the positing, consequently numbering and thus

undetermined act. While, however, the + is nothing else than 0, it must

necessarily bear a relation to it, and thus retrograde into the 0. This

retrogression is an act in the reverse direction, or what is indicated

in mathematics by negation. The-has been therefore necessarily granted

with the +, else the + would not be represented as = to 0. The act of

positing is therefore at the same time also an act of negation. So soon

as the 0 is or exists, it is = +-. The realization of the Eternal is

accordingly a complete antagonism of itself. For 0 is equal to +-, not

simply = + or = to-.

60. The being of the Eternal is therefore a _self-manifestation_. Every

Singular is nothing but a self-manifestation; since all numbers are

only positions of zero or of +, which can never be without-. In every

essence there are two, but the two are the one essence itself, which

posits itself by division. The Positing of the Eternal in the sense in

which it has been hitherto adopted, namely, as a realization of the

same, is not merely an act of positing, not an indeterminate Positing,

but an antagonism of itself. The zero is simply the indeterminate

Positing, or the negative Positing; but the number, or the real is the

antagonism of zero, the +-, or the self-manifestation. The 0 cannot be

thought of for itself alone without the +; the latter, however, not

without 0, as well as the-also not without 0; for it is the suppression

of the posited 0, namely, the +. Every act of self-manifestation is

therefore twofold, a manifestation (= +), but a manifestation of

itself, consequently a retrogression into 0 (=-). Through negation the

Finite becomes united with the Eternal. Every disappearance of the

Finite is a retrogression into the Eternal; for it must return to

whence it came. It has arisen out of nothing, is itself the existing

nothing; it must therefore retrograde again into the nothing.

GOD.

61. The self-manifestation of the primary act is _self-consciousness_.

The eternal self-consciousness is God.

62. The continued act of self-consciousness, or becoming self-conscious

repeated, is called _representation_. God is therefore comprehended

in ceaseless representation. Representations are single acts of

self-consciousness. Single acts, however, are real things. All real

things, however, are the world. The world therefore originates with the

representations of the Eternal.

63. The representations are, however, manifested or attain only reality

through _expression_. The world is therefore the language of God; the

creation of the world the speaking of God. "God spake, and it was."

It is not merely said, God thought and it was. Thought belongs merely

to spirit; in so far, however, as it becomes apparent, it is a word,

and the sum of all apparent thoughts is speech. This is the created,

realized system of thought. The thought is only the idea of the world,

but speech is the idea actualized.

64. As thought differs from speaking, so does God from the world.

Our world consists in our apparent thoughts, namely, the words. The

universe is the _language_ of God. So far as the thoughts lie at the

foundation of the words, it can be said, that our world were the play

of our thoughts, and the actual world that of God's. The word has

become world. Worldly things have no more reality for God, than our

words or our language for us. We carry a world within us while we

think; we posit or create a world without us while we speak. Thus God

carries the world within himself while he thinks; he posits the same

without himself or creates it, while he speaks. In so far as thought

necessarily precedes speech, it may be said, that there would have been

no world, if God had not thought. In the same sense it may be also

said, that all things are nothing but representations, thoughts, ideas

of God. So soon as God thinks and speaks is there a real thing. To

speak and to create are one. All, that we perceive, are words, thoughts

of God; we are ourselves nothing else than such words or thoughts of

God, consequently his metatypes or images, in as far as we unite in

ourselves the whole system of speech. There is therefore no being

without self-consciousness. That only which thinks is (for itself);

that which does not think is not for itself, but only for some other

consciousness. The world differs from God as doth our speech from us.

The self-consciousness of God is independent of the world, even as our

self-consciousness is independent of our speech.

65. The divine laws are also the laws of the world; this has therefore

been created and governed in accordance with eternal and immutable laws.

66. Physio-philosophy is the history of creation; the creation,

however, is the language of God. The system of thought, however,

lies necessarily at the foundation of the system of speech. Now the

science of the laws of thought is called logic; physio-philosophy is

therefore a divine doctrine of speech or a divine logic. The laws of

speech instruct us in the genesis of language. Physio-philosophy is,

therefore, the science of the genesis of the world, or Cosmogony.

FORM OF GOD--TRIUNITY.

67. As the complete principle of mathematics consists of three ideas,

so also does the primary principle of nature, or the Eternal. The

primary principle of mathematics is 0; so soon, however, as it is

actual, is it + and-; or the primary idea resolves itself in being at

once into two ideas, each of which resembles the other in essence,

but differs from it in form. Thus it is here one and the same essence

under three forms, or three are one. Now that which holds good of

mathematical principles, must hold good also of the principles of

nature. The primary act is manifested, or operates under three forms,

which correspond to the 0, + and-.

These three ideas of the Eternal are all equivalent to each other, are

the same primary act, each of them being whole and undivided, but each

otherwise posited. The positing primary act is the whole Eternal; the

posited is likewise the whole Eternal, and that which is subtractive,

retrogressive, combining the two first, is also the whole Eternal.

Although all three ideas are equivalent to each other, still the

positing idea ranks first, the posited second, and the combining third;

not as if they had first arisen successively (this is impossible, for

they are coexistent, namely, before all time), nor as if they occupied

different positions (for they are everywhere); but only according to

their order and value. How one may be three and three one, is thus

rendered comprehensible only by mathematics.

68. The first idea is the original, that therefore which is thoroughly

independent, which having arisen from and being based upon itself,

has consequently emerged from nothing else; in short, it is the

eternal idea, like the mathematical 0 = _Monas aoristos_. Everything

is possible with it; it can propose and solve all problems, knows

therefore everything and creates everything. It is the generative,

creative and paternal idea.

69. The two other ideas have emerged out of the first, although

apparently equivalent to it; yea, they have themselves issued out

of themselves. The second idea is, therefore, _Dyas aoristos_, and

corresponds to the mathematical +; the third idea is the _Trias

aoristos_, and corresponds to the mathematical-, so that by the three

the primary trinity 0 +-is completed. The first idea labours or, what

is more, rejoices from all eternity to convert itself into the two

others. The action or the life of God consists in eternally manifesting

itself, eternally contemplating itself in unity and duality, eternally

dividing itself and still remaining one. The second idea has issued

next from the first, and is therefore related to it as Son is to

Father, when the ideas are viewed as personified. The third idea has

emerged conjointly from the second and first, and forms therefore the

spiritual union, the mutual love between both. It may be therefore

simply called Ghost or Spirit, if it is thought of as personified.

70. Since every Singular, having been produced through the primary

trinity, is only the expressed word of the primary trinity, so also

must their qualities be recognizable in the same. The Singular is not

simply therefore a position of one idea, but of all three. All things

have issued out of the trinity. The essence of the universe consists in

the trinity which is unity, and in the unity which is trinity; for it

is a likeness of the primary trinity. _Being_, generally, is an act,

and that, indeed, of a threefold nature. Apart from act or function

there is no _being_. That, which is called nothing, is in itself an

act, and there is, therefore, no absolute nothing. The nothing is only

something relative to a particular being. Even the mathematical zero is

not nothing, but an act. It is nothing only in reference to particular

numbers. Numbering is a repetition of one and the same act. The forms

or conditions of the primary act are Rest, Motion, and Extension or

expansion.

a. PRIMARY REST. (_First form of the Primary Act._)

71. The primary idea is the position simply without any relation, or

any antagonism; it is the oscillating resting point in the universe,

around which everything collects itself, and from which everything

emerges; the _Centrum ubique, circumferentia nusquam_. The primary

idea is the substratum of everything, which will come before us in the

sequel of this work. Everything depends upon this primary essence;

all action, motion, and form issues forth from it; or rather, in all

phenomena naught else appears than the primary essence in different

stages of position, just as in all numbers naught else appears but the

zero. The primary idea is the absolute beginning. This primary idea is

the non-representable, the never apparent and yet omnipresent, idea;

but which is always withdrawing itself from our view when we imagine or

believe that we gaze upon it; in short, the Spiritual, which declares

itself in everything and yet always remains the same. The origin of all

action may be termed the primary force.

b. MOTION, TIME. (_Second form of the Primary Act._)

72. The primary idea operates only, while it posits; through positing,

however, arises a succession of positing, or numbers; positing

and successive positing are one. The function of the primary idea

consists in an eternal repetition of the essence; the primary act is

a continuous self-repeating act. Repetition of the primary act devoid

of another substratum is _Time_. Time is none other than the eternal

repetition of the positing of the Eternal, corresponding to the series

of numbers + 1 + 1 + 1 + n. Time has not been created, but has emerged

directly out of the primary act and its position; it is the function of

God himself. Something has thus already originated, which appears to

conduct us into the universe. Time is the first portal through which

the operation of God passes over into the world. Time is the infinite

succession of numbers or the mathematical nothings. The mathematising,

numbering act is Time. Numbers, however, are Singulars or finitudes,

which constitute the world.

73. Time is infinite, for it is the totality of positing; it is only

the points or numbers in it that are the Finite.

74. All things are created in time; for time is the totality of

Singulars. Time is no stationary quantity, which is always changing

itself into something new during its progressive flux. It is not a

continuous stream, but a repetition of one and the same act, namely,

the primary act, like as it were to a rolling ball, which constantly

returns upon itself. There is no endless, still less an eternal thing;

for things are only positions of time. Time itself is, however, only

repetition, and thus also a suppression of these positions. The

vicissitude of things is in fact time; if there be no change, there is

also no time. Time is an universal property of things. Exemption from

time is only in the Eternal.

75. Time, not being itself the Finite, but creating it, is not itself

a Real, but still an Ideal, a form only of the primary act, an idea,

with which finite things have been directly posited. Time is the act of

numbering; numbering is thinking; thinking is time. Our thinking is our

time. In sleep there is no time for us. God's thought is God's time;

God's time, however, is all time, consequently time of the world. Time

is not of earthly but heavenly descent or origin. In so far a divine

quality belongs to all finite things. They are divine, in so far as

they are time; terrestrial, in so far as they are evanescent moments of

time.

POLARITY.

76. Time is an action of the primary power; and all things are active

only in so far as they are filled or inspired with the idea of time.

The whole activity of things, all their forces arise out of the primary

act or primary power, are only moments of the same. There are, however,

no positive without negative numbers, consequently also no moments of

time without suppression of the same. There is, therefore, no single

force, but each is the position of + and-. A force consisting of two

principles is called _Polarity_. Time is, therefore, the primary

polarity, and polarity is manifested at the very instant in which the

creation of the world is stirring.

77. Polarity is the first force which appears in the world. If time

is eternal, polarity must also be eternal. There is no world, and in

general nothing at all without polar force.

78. Every single thing is a duplicity.

79. The law of causality is a law of polarity. Causality is valid only

in time, is only a series of numbers. Time itself has no causality.

Causality is an act of generation. The sex is rooted in the first

movement of the world.

MOTION.

80. Polarity may be viewed as a single positing of +-; if, however,

this positing repeats itself, _Motion_ originates, viz. when many

+-+-are consecutively posited, and thus the principal poles separate

from each other, as in an iron bar when magnetizing. Time is a polar

positing of the primary act, and an endless repetition of this

positing; through this originate individual things, whose succession is

motion.

81. Primary motion is the result of primary polarity. All motion has

originated from duplicity; consequently from the idea in a dynamic not

a mechanical manner. A mechanical motion, which might be produced ad

infinitum by mechanical impulses, is an absurdity. There is nowhere a

purely mechanical motion; nothing, as it is at present in the word,

has become so by impulse; an internal act, a polar tension lies at the

bottom of all motion.

82. Motion itself, however, is not twofold in character; it is unity,

but the result of duality. In time we have to distinguish the polar

act of position, and the act of repeating this position, which is

motion. Motion is the simple repetition of the polar, twofold act, or

the ceaseless separation of poles; but, as in every polar line the two

poles are in all cases together, so even is this mutual separation of

poles only a repetition of polarity.

83. Motion also is not created, but has emerged directly from the

Eternal, is the primary function itself repeated. Motion is the ever

self-manifesting, consequently progressive God.

84. Motion is thought, which is manifested as speech. Thought polarizes

the fingers. If the thought be powerful it moves them, and through

them other bodies. Speech is only a thought that has passed over into

motion. The world is the thought of God that has been translated into

motion, the _moved thought of God_--thought spoken. It is here evident

that the world is not simply the _thought_ but the _language_ of God;

for there is no action without motion; consequently no thought without

speech, and vice versâ.

85. There is no thing which were without motion, just as there is none

without time. A Finite without everlasting motion is a contradiction.

All rest in the world is only relative, is but a combined motion. There

is only rest in the Eternal, in the nothing of nature.

86. The primary motion is only possible in a circle, because it fills

every thing.

87. The motion of finite things by polarity may, in a wider sense, be

called life; for life is motion in the circle. Polarity, however, is

a constant retrogression into itself. Without life there is no being.

Nothing is, simply by virtue of being, e. g. by its mere presence; but

everything of which a being can be declared, is only, or manifests

itself, by its polar motion or by life. Being and life are inseparable

ideas. While God acts, he creates life.

88. Life is nothing new, that came first into the world, after it was

created, but an Original, an idea, a moved thought of God, the primary

act itself with all its consequences.

89. There is in the universe no vital force of its own; the individual

things lie not there some time and await the polarizing breath, but

they first _become_ through the breath of God. The _Causa existentiæ_

is life.

90. There is nothing properly dead in the world; that only is dead

which is not, only the nothing. Something can only cease to live, when

its motion ceases; this, however, ceases only when deprived of its

polarity; the polarity dissolved, however, is zero. Thus individual

things retreat into the Absolute, if they cease to live. Everything

in the world is endowed with life; the world itself is alive, and

continues only, maintains itself, by virtue of its life; just as an

organic body maintains itself, only while it is constantly being

generated anew by the vital process.

91. Every living thing is twofold in character. It is one persistent

in itself, and one immersed in the universe. In everything,

therefore, are two processes, one individualizing, vitalizing, and one

universalizing, destructive. By the process of destruction, the finite

thing seeks to become the universe itself; by the vitalizing process,

however, the variety of the universe, and yet with that to remain a

Singular. That only is truly living which represents the Eternal, and

the whole multiplicity of the universe in the _Singular_.

92. The whole in the singular is called _Individual_. The individual is

an example of computation, which admits only of being developed, from

its comprehending the whole of arithmetic in itself. Nothing individual

can persist eternally; it must eternally move itself, consequently fill

up everything, displace everything, must become itself the universe.

MAN.

93. Time consists of single acts; i. e. the life or the absolute act

does not work with one stroke, but an infinite number of times. All

acts, therefore, taken together, all finite things in time, are equal

to the primary act or the Eternal.

94. There are two totalities, a primary totality 0 +-, and a secondary,

or the summing up of all numbers 0 + n-n; the former the eternal, the

latter the finite totality, or the one the eternity, the other the

infinity.

95. The more a thing has adopted into itself of the Manifold of the

universe, by so much the more is it animated, by so much the more does

it resemble the Eternal. It is conceivable, for a finite or living

essence to unite all numbers or acts in itself, without, however,

its being the very Eternal. It would, however, be obviously the most

perfect finite essence, and, as a secondary totality, be the likeness

of the primitive; the former the compound universality, the latter the

identical.

96. Such an essence would be necessarily the highest and last,

whereunto creation could attain; for more than the universe cannot

be represented in one thing. With such an essence creation would be

closed or would terminate.

97. Since the realization of the Eternal is a becoming self-conscious,

so is the highest creature also a Self-conscious, but a Singular.

Such a creature is the finite God, or God become corporeal. God is

_Monas indeterminata_, the highest creature is _Monas determinata,

Totum determinatum_. A finite self-conscious being we call Man. Man

is an idea of God, but that in which God wholly, and in every single

act becomes an object unto himself. Man is God represented by God in

the infinity of time. God is a Man representing God in _one_ act of

self-consciousness, without time.

98. Man is God wholly manifested. God has become Man, zero has become

+-. Man is the whole of arithmetic, compacted, however, out of all

numbers; he can therefore produce numbers out of himself. Man is a

complex of all that surrounds him, namely, of element, mineral, plant

and animal.

99. The other things _below_ man are also ideas of God, but none

of these ideas is the whole representation of arithmetic. They are

only parts of the divine conscience posited in time; but man is

God, planted or posited uninjured in time. Man is the object in the

self-consciousness of God; the creatures below man are, however, the

objects only of the _consciousness_ of God. Thus, if God places before

and from himself only single qualities, there are worldly things;

if, however, God in this crowd of representations attains to his own

entire representation, then arises Man. God is = + 0-, Man = + [oo]

0-[oo], the animal is = + n 0-n. The animals are only represented

in part. The subject of self-consciousness is = + 0-; the objects,

however, are the numbers which are equivalent to this, being = [oo]

+ 3 + 2 + 1 + 0-1-2-3-[oo]. Thus if all numbers, all world-elements,

together with their perfections, occur in consciousness = + 0-, there

is a Man; if only single, and perhaps but few things, such as food,

stones, &c. (with the entire exception of the celestial bodies), enter

consciousness, there is an animal. They are represented only partly or

in a portion of the universe, but man is represented wholly or in all

its parts. Animals are fragments of man.

100. No creatures _below_ Man can possess self-consciousness. They

have, indeed, consciousness of their several acts and of their

sensations, and possess memory; but as these several acts are only

parts of the world, or of the great consciousness, and are not the

Whole, they can never become objective unto themselves, never imagine.

Animals are men, who never imagine. They are imaginative, but never

of themselves wholly; they are therefore beings who never attain to

consciousness concerning themselves. They are single accounts; Man is

the whole of mathematics.

FREEDOM.

101. An action, which is not determined by some other action, is free.

God is free, because apart from him there is none other action.

102. Man, as being an image of God, is likewise free; as being an

image of the world he is devoid of freedom. Man is, therefore, in his

primary commencement or principle free, but not in his end or object

to be attained. In the resolution Man is free, in the execution he is

not free. The mathematician can select at pleasure any proposition; but

having selected it, must solve it in accordance with necessary laws and

with definite numbers and figures. Man is a twofold being, compounded

of freedom and necessity.

RETROSPECT.

103. Hitherto we have considered simply the arithmetical relations of

the primary act and of the universe. We have shown, to wit, that all

ideas fluctuate simply under the forms of numbers; that everything was

comprised in the 0 +-. Time was only the active series of numbers;

motion was the actual arithmetical calculation, namely, the process of

reducing numbers to absolute identity, to zero.

104. Life is moreover only a mathematical problem, which, the higher

it ascends, approaches so much the nearer to absolute zero in its

attainment of the infinity of numbers, becomes so much the more endowed

with life.

105. Arithmetic is the science of the second idea, or that of time and

motion, or of life; it is, therefore, the first science; mathematics

not only begins with it, but creation also, with the becoming of time

and of life. Arithmetic is, accordingly, the truly absolute or divine

science, and therefore everything in it is also directly certain,

because everything in it resembles the Divine. Theology is arithmetic

personified.

106. Hence it follows in the most perfect manner, that every science,

if it would possess certainty, must resemble arithmetic. Now a science

always implies a science treating of certain objects; all certain

objects must, therefore, resemble the objects of arithmetic; or all

objects, of whatever denomination, whether natural or spiritual, must

correspond to arithmetical objects, consequently in idea be numbers, an

actual arithmetical problem, as it were the numbers of motion, of life.

107. A natural thing is nothing but a self-moving number; an organic or

living thing is a number moving itself out of itself, or spontaneously;

an inorganic thing, however, is a number moved by another thing; now,

as this other thing is also a real number, so then is every inorganic

thing a number moved by another number, and thus ad infinitum. The

movements in nature are only movements of numbers by numbers; even as

arithmetical computation is none other than a movement of numbers by

numbers, but with this difference, that in the latter this operates in

an ideal manner, in the former after a real.

c. FORM, SPACE. (_Third form, of the Primary Act._)

108. Viewed arithmetically every position is a number, geometrically,

however, it is a point. What the 0 is in arithmetic, the point is in

geometry; the one the arithmetical, the other the geometrical nothing.

Both sciences commence with nothing and are only different views of

nothing. The 0 is a temporal nothing (a number), the point a spatial

nothing (a figure).

109. The first motion of numbers or of points is the motion of the

primary number, the 0, or the primary act; and this motion depends upon

the multiplicity of numbers or points, upon the disintegration of the

identical primary number, upon the +-. The first motion of the primary

act is an expansion of itself into multiplicity, whereby not merely

sequence but an addition also is posited. The primary act is not simply

positing, but also posited; as the former it is time, as the latter

it is time posited universally. Time remaining stationary is _Space_.

Space is not different in essence from time, but only according to

position; it is only time resting, while this is moved, active space.

110. Space has first arisen out of time, as the third idea out of

the second, but only ideally. It has arisen out of it, while, time

being the act of positing, it is the posited; now as time posits from

eternity, so is space also from eternity and in eternity. The eternity

of space, however, depends not upon duration, but upon extension; it is

unlimited.

111-112. Space is everywhere, as time is ever. Two spaces can no more

exist than two times. There is only _one_ Eternal. Time and space are,

however, nothing special that has attained unto the Eternal, but the

Eternal itself. They are also not two kinds of qualities subsisting

near each other, but are _one in kind_. The series of numbers is

infinite, thus universal; space is consequently universal.

113. Space is an idea like time, a form of God like time; it is the

passive form, the extended 0 = + 0-.

114. All temporal things are also in space and limited. An unlimited

thing extended through the whole of space is an absurdity. God's

operation only is extended through the whole of space; it is space

itself; when he willed to act, he became time; but when he was time, he

became space.

115. Space has not been created, but has emerged out of the Eternal; it

is nothing new in the universe, nothing next to God and present with

him, but coexistent with God.

116. Single things must be both in space and in time; or a real thing

first originates, where time and space cross each other at one point;

they cross, however, everywhere, and therefore things are everywhere.

117. There is no void or empty space, no time and no place, were a

Finite could not be; for time and space are virtually the manifesting

primary act, the zero that has become thing.

POINT.

118. Time has begun with number, space with the point, with the

spatial nothing, with the zero of space. This point necessarily posits

itself "ad infinitum;" it extends itself also in all directions, and

necessarily in equal distances. Such an extended point is the _Sphere_.

119. The sphere is nothing peculiar, nothing new in the thoughts of

God, but only the point expanded, while this again is but a contracted

sphere, just as the totality of numbers is an expanded 0, and this

their contracted sphere.

120. Space is spherical, and, indeed, an infinite sphere. The sphere

has been posited with space, and consequently from eternity; it is also

an idea, and that, indeed, the total idea; for time and space have in

it been posited together.

121. For God to become real, he must appear under the form of the

sphere. There is no other form for God. God manifesting is an infinite

sphere.

122. The sphere is, therefore, the most perfect form; for it is the

primary, the divine form. Angular forms are imperfect. The more

spherical a thing is in form, by so much the more perfect and divine is

it. The Inorganic is angular, the Organic spherical.

123. The universe is a globe, and everything, which is a Total in the

universe, is a globe.

LINE, LIGHT, MAGNETISM.

124. While the point expands, it is active; this active expansion is

a simple repetition of the point, and this is a _Line_, which in the

sphere, however, is a _Radius_. With time originates not merely a

series of numbers, but together with it also the line. The line and

time are of one kind, repeated positions of the nothing, of the point.

It is consequently clear, how that time were a repeated positing of the

Eternal itself: for the line is only a repeated self-positing of the

point, of the nothing. God fluctuating in his eternity, and the point,

are one in kind; but God acting is a line, being or existing a sphere,

i. e. the point in the act of being.

125. The line is nothing new in creation, but time itself, when

regarded more closely. God creates the line as little as he does time;

but this originates unto him, while he moves, while he thinks. It is

impossible to think without producing a line. The line is therefore

from eternity, is a series of numbers.

126. The essence of the line does not consist in its two extremities

being continued with equal significance into the Infinite; but in its

_radiality_, i. e. that one extremity turned towards the centre has

become central, converging, absolute; but the other turned towards

the periphery has become divergent, finite, multiplicity. The primary

line is a line produced with two antagonized characters. The central

extremity is 0, the peripheral is the bisected zero = ±. This radial

line gives us the antetype of a new polarity. The two extremities

are not related as + and-towards each other, but as 0 and +-. At the

instant, when a line originates in the universe, it is not a line

merely, or an indefinite line that originates; but one that is definite

at both extremities, polar, indeed, but after a determinate fashion.

Nothing, not even a finite thing, exists in an indefinite manner.

127. There is no mathematically straight line in the world: all real

lines are polar; they are all rooted in God by one extremity, by the

other in finitude. The primary act becomes in its first operation

not merely a posited nothing, a numerical series; not merely time,

not merely an aoristic line, but a _Linea determinata_; in short, God

can step forth into time only as radius. The _Monas determinata_ is a

_Monas radialis_, or a centroperipheric monas.

128. The essence of the primary antagonism is a centroperipheric

antagonism. As centre is related to periphery, so is here one pole

related to the other. Polar existence and central or peripheral

existence are one. Primary polarity is centroperiphery. The primary

line is constantly in a state of polar action, which is called

_tension_; for it is always converging and diverging, at once central

and peripheric. Every line originates, therefore, only by tension, and

is only by it, yea, every line is nothing else than this tension.

129. A line, one extremity whereof strives towards the centre, the

other to the periphery, the one to identity, the other to duality,

will exhibit itself in the world as a _line of Light_, in the planet

as a _Magnetic line_. Magnetism is centroperipheric antagonism, a

radial line, 0--±, the action of the line being cleft at one extremity.

Magnetism has its root in the beginning of creation. It is prophesied

with time.

SURFACE, ELECTRICITY, OXYDATION.

130. The periphery is the boundary of the sphere, and is, consequently,

a superficies or _Surface_. This, therefore, originates also directly

with the positing of the Eternal.

131. As the primary line is not a purely polar, but a radial line, so

is the primary surface not a level, but a curved or convex surface.

132. There is _no level_ surface in the universe, no pure surfaces any

more than pure lines. All surfaces are curved. For example, those of

drops, of the heavenly bodies, of animals. The surface of a sphere is

no _Continuum_; but consists properly of the divided peripheric and

upright extremities of the radii; it is a ±.

133. The surface of a globe has no centre, no 0, like the radius; but

is an absolute Dualized, a ± without 0.

134. This mode of operating of the primary act is manifested as

electricity. Electricity is a merely peripheric antagonism, without

centre, thus without union; an eternally Dissevered without rest.

Electricity is thus also a special form, under which polarity makes its

appearance, and is likewise rooted in the primary creation. There is,

consequently, no thing which were not magnetic and electric.

135. The idea of a surface is constantly that of _surrounding_. It

is not generated by a section of a globe, but by the completion, the

_circumferential limitation_ of the sphere. The essence of the sphere

is _boundary_. Every surface is finite, is convex. In the divine

position a surface never occurs, save on the boundary of the primary

sphere.

136. As no thing can exist without a line, without a radius, so also

none can be without surface, without circumscription. The single

surface is identical with the _Locus_ of the old philosophers. Every

Finite is a closed whole, and that thing is of the most perfect kind

which has the most perfect closure, surface, periphery (or skin).

137. The surface is also not different from the primary act, but a

form of the primary act itself; or a boundary, which, however, nowhere

remains stationary, but is always displaced by means of the eternal

act. Therefore the world is at once unlimited and limited; the latter

in reference to the closure of the surface, the former to the endless

expansion of the same.

138. The periphery is the object in divine consciousness, the point

which, posited without the centre, is thus one and the same, centre

(subject) and periphery (object). It is everywhere the same point, the

same 0, wherever it be posited. Hence the profound saying, "_Mundus est

Sphæra, cujus centrum ubique, circumferentia nusquam_."

139. The surface stands in antagonism to the line, like periphery and

centre; it stands perpendicular upon the radius, and can never pass

parallel to linear action. Electricity ranks in eternal antagonism to

magnetism.

SPHERE, HEAT, CHEMISTRY.

140. The line and surface are density, the representation of time

and space; they have therefore like these originated out of nothing,

namely, out of the point. The sphere is the expanded nothing. Nothing

thus extended, or nothing _posited_, becomes a something, viz. line,

surface, density, polarity. The line is a long nothing, the surface a

hollow nothing, the sphere a dense nothing; in short, the something is

a nothing which has received only predicates. All things are nothings

with different forms. The point is = 0, the line = +, the surface = +-,

the sphere = + 0-.

141. The internal motion of the globe, or the becoming of the globe, is

manifested in the universe as _Heat_, in the planet as _Chemistry_.

ROTATION.

142. The primary sphere is rotating, for it has originated through

motion; the motion of the sphere cannot, however, be progressive,

for it fills everything. God is a rotating globe. The world is God

rotating. All motion is circular, and there is everywhere no straight

motion any more than there is a single line or straight surface.

Everything is comprehended in ceaseless rotation. Without rotation

there is no being and no life; for without it, there is no sphere, no

space and no time.

143. The more perfectly circular the motion of a thing is, so much

the more perfect is it. Straight motion is only the mechanical; such,

however, exists not through itself. The more a body moves in a straight

direction, the more mechanical and ignoble is it. Straight motion too

yields only straight form.

GEOMETRY.

144. The sphere with its attributes is the totality of numbers, is thus

a rotating number. The universe is the same. In arithmetic the quantity

of divine positions is regarded; in the sphere, however, the direction

of these positions, or of series of numbers.

145. The doctrine of the sphere is _Geometry_; for all forms are

contained in the sphere. All geometrical proofs admit of being

conducted through the sphere. Geometry has originated directly from

arithmetic, or is arithmetic itself, with this difference, that the

latter regards series of numbers as individualities, the former,

however, as a whole. Arithmetic is a geometry _seriebus discretis_;

geometry is an arithmetic _seriebus continuis_, a solidified arithmetic.

146. Geometry is a science of equal value with arithmetic; it is

even as certain, because it has no other propositions; it is equally

eternal, is the same realization of the primary act, the _Deus

geometrizans_ of the Pythagoreans. Everything to be certain must

therefore resemble geometry, must be itself a position of geometry,

only under other relations.

147. Geometry is more real, more finite, therefore also more apparent,

and, as it were, more material than arithmetic. The ideas in it have

become something determinate, have assumed form, while before they

still fluctuated formless in arithmetic; here were they mere ghosts

without veils, but in geometry they have received these veils. _Time_

has received for its form, its body, the line; _space_, the surface;

_life_, the globe, consequently the rotation for its form or body. It

is to be here remarked, that ideas always become more real and more

finite, always approximate nearer to actual manifestation, the lower

they descend or the more they are considered individually. Geometry has

not originated later than arithmetic, but is only a more individual

view of ideas, arithmetic being more universal. Geometry is arithmetic

with stationary numbers, = points. The Divine thus approximates to

manifestation, to materiality, the more individual it becomes; and

this is very natural, for it verily limits itself more and obtains

always more predicates. The more a thing obtains predicates, by so

much the more perfect is its finiteness. By geometry we are actually

transferred into the universe, but only into the formal, in which it

has, like a skeleton, been sketched for us solely upon a general plan;

namely, as infinite extension, in which line and periphery, central and

peripheric action, magnetism, electricity, and rotation, &c., have been

prefigured.

B.--_HYLOGENY._

a. GRAVITY. (_First form of the World. Rest._)

148. In arithmetic the divine acts are only undetermined = numbers. In

geometry the numbers obtain determinate or finite directions, become

figures. All figures have, however, an especial direction to the

centre. Figures are nought but centres manifoldly posited.

149. The direction to a centre is, however, an act, which never ceases

to operate. The primary act strives therefore to posit ad infinitum

nought else than a centre, i. e. points.

150. If there are points without the centre, it so happens only because

the succeeding points have been displaced by the points that were first

posited. The peripheric points are only with reluctance out of the

centre. The globe only exists in an uneasy state, because it has no

place in the centre.

151. Every finite thing strives towards the centre. The finite is only

something, in so far as it is posited in the centre, and it maintains

its value according to its distance from the centre. This exertion

or endeavour, by virtue of which things would be in the centre, is

_Gravity_.

152. What the retrogression of numbers into 0 is, that is the gravity

in the sphere. The gravity is a geometrical reduction of position

unto nothing. The sphere is only produced by _action_, and that

indeed by the centroperipheric. This action must therefore manifest

itself in two ways, as centrifugality and centripetality. The first

is the dispersion of the primary act or of points, the second is the

collection of the primary acts or points into the unity, and this is

gravity. Centrifugality originates only in a constrained manner or with

reluctance, for the primary act always seeks the centre, and only moves

towards the periphery, because it has no longer any place there. If

centripetality be regarded as a force, then is centrifugality no force,

but only centripetality itself retreating from the centre; even as cold

and darkness are probably no particular forces in themselves, but only

weaker degrees of heat or light.

153. Gravity is not motion simply, but motion unto a centre, unto rest.

154. That which is itself in the very centre is therefore not heavy.

The primary act is not heavy.

155. As all finite things are positions of the primary act in the

sphere out of the centre, so are all of them heavy. Gravity is the

force that strives unto the centre, and which is there impeded by other

forces already present therein. A finite thing, that is not heavy, is

a contradiction. The gravity of the single thing is weight. The world

itself has no weight, or else it must be heavy in relation to something

else without it. The ideas of gravity and weight, as we speak of them

in reference to individual things, are not applicable to the world,

still less to God.

156. Gravity is also nothing new in the world, but it is only the

positing of the centre in space. As necessarily as the Eternal, when it

manifests itself, must appear under a definite form, so also must it

be necessary with the eternal effort, to return into itself or appear

as gravity. Gravity is nothing different from the primary act, nothing

specially created; but the spherical position of the same tending unto

the centre.

157. Now, as the sphere has originated out of nothing, so also has

gravity originated out of the same. The form is a formed nothing:

the form is, however, no form without internal forming force, and to

this gravity belongs. The being of form and the being of gravity are

one. Gravity is a weighty nothing, a heavy essence, striving towards

centre, a realization of the first divine idea. Gravity cannot,

therefore, be perceived in the universe as a whole, but only in its

parts.

158. If gravity is the primary act that has become real, so must

everything originate out of gravity, or everything must acknowledge

gravity to be the common mother of the finite. It is in all cases,

or in every individual thing, only the gravity, the Ponderose, which

exists, otherwise nothing exists; for verily nothing exists without the

divine primary, which is incessantly a central, act.

MATTER.

159. Points, which strive towards the centre, are compressed, because

they would all occupy one and the same spot. These points, however,

are forces, which take up space and therefore exclude other points. A

space that excludes another is _Matter_. Everything which has been said

of gravity holds good in respect to matter; for matter is only another

word for gravity. A heavy thing is a material thing.

160. To the totality of a thing belongs not merely its figure nor its

tension or motion simply, but also its _gravity_. This is, however, a

whole sphere. Matter is, consequently, a total position of the primary

act, a trinity of ideas.

161. Matter has been imparted with space and time. All space is

material; ay, matter is itself the space and the time, the form and

the motion; for space is nothing special, but only extended or formed

force. It is here also shown that the nothing does not exist. There

is as little nothing in the universe as there is an 0 in mathematics.

So soon as the nothing is, there is something. The whole universe is

material, is nothing but matter; for there is the primary act eternally

repeating itself in the centre. The universe is a rotating globe of

matter.

162. But the universe is an acting gravity, a matter, in which the

centroperipheric antagonism is active; it is therefore _everywhere

matter only, which acts_. There is no activity without matter, but also

no matter without activity, both being one; for gravity is itself

the activity, and itself the matter. Matter is only limited activity.

A matter which does not move is not; it can only subsist through

continuous origination, through life. There is no dead matter; it is

alive through its being, through the eternal that is in it. Matter has

no existence in itself, but it is the Eternal only that exists in it.

Everything is God, that is there, and without God there is absolutely

nothing.

163. It is an illusion to believe that matter were an actual something

subsisting in itself. It is even so with numbers, upon which a

reality also is bestowed, when they are still demonstrable nothings.

A number is nothing truly than an affirmation several times repeated,

a reiterated deposition of what is nothing, what is no number. This

deposition happens likewise in the universe, where it is the primary

act, that is deposited. Where, however, this is, no other station can

occur. This exclusive property is usually called the _Impenetrable_,

the _Material_. It cannot be said in what spot matter arises, so

secretly and suddenly does it start into existence. It is matter

properly at the first manifestation of being, of time and of space; for

at the same instant also the line, surface, density and gravity have

been given. The line does not exist if it does not _act_; the sphere

does not exist if it be not inert, i. e. if its forces do not strive

towards the centre, and consequently to connexion. Nothing exists if it

is not material. Matter is accordingly coexistent with the presence of

God.

164. The Immaterial does not exist; for even the Material which is

_not_, is the Immaterial. Everything that is, is material. Now,

however, there is nothing that is not; consequently, there is

everywhere nothing immaterial. Immateriality is only a postulate

principle, by which to get at matter, like the 0 in mathematics, which

is nothing in itself, does not even exist, but that still must be

posited, in order that numbers may bear a reference to it.

165. God only is immaterial; he is the only permanent immaterial

invention, and the axiom being the Formless, Polarless, Timeless. A spirit

with form is a contradiction. But the matter also does not exist,

because matter is nothing, because it is only a sphere of central

actions, which is gravity.

166. The material universe is called nature. There can be only _one_

nature, as well according to time as to space and to divine animation.

There is only one God, whose operations expressed, or materially

posited, are nature. Nature has originated out of nothing like time

and space; or with these has nature also been. God has made heaven and

earth out of nothing.

167. God has not found matter co-eternal with himself, and, like an

architect, arranged this to his fancy; but he has, out of his own

eternal omnipotence, by his will simply, evoked the world out of

nothing unto existence. He has thought and spoken, and it was.

168. The doctrine of matter is the Philosophy of Nature. It is

therefore the science also of all Singulars, like geometry and

arithmetic; thus at bottom is only the third part of mathematics, and

is even as certain and demonstrable as this.

ÆTHER.

169. The matter, which is the direct position of God, which fills the

whole universe, which is the time in a state of tension and motion, the

formed space, the heavy primary essence, I call the _Primary matter_,

the matter of the world, cosmic matter, _Æther_. The æther is the

first realization of God, the eternal position of the same. It is the

first matter of creation. Everything has consequently originated out

of it. It is the highest, divine element, the divine body, the primary

substance = 0 +-.

170. The æther fills out the whole universe, and is, consequently, a

sphere, yea, the world's sphere itself; the world is a rotating globe

of æther.

171. The sphere of æther, not as yet individualized, I call _chaos_.

From the beginning was chaos, and this was æther, and unto the end

will chaos become æther. The æther is the apparent nothing, and thus

it is the chaos. This was not the latter and not the former, but an

existing nothing.

172. The æther is the imponderable matter, because it is gravity and

totality itself, because it is the infinite matter.

173. The æther has no life; it is the only mortuum, because it is the

heavy 0. In æther, however, reside all the principles of life, all

numbers; it is the substratum, the essence of life. There is only one

universal substratum in nature.

HEAVENLY BODY, POINT, CENTRE, GRAVITY.

174. Everything which emerges out of æther and is posited as a finite

matter, can be nought else than a repetition of the sphere.

175. The æther subdivides into an endless number of subordinate

rotating spheres, and so it must, because the world is not a whole

devoid of parts, but only a whole in the parts, only a repetition of

_positions_. The chaotic sphere of æther consists essentially at one

and the same time of an infinity of spheres.

176. A chaos has never existed. The General never exists, but only the

Particular. Chaos was from eternity a multiplicity of ætherial globes.

Chaos is only postulate.

177. Every sphere of æther is complete in itself and closed, and

therefore rotating around its axis and around the universal axis of the

æther.

178. The new rotation in the heavenly bodies condensed in the periphery

of the æther, follows as a necessary result, on account of the unequal

velocity of its outwardly and inwardly lying points.

179. Every individual sphere has _two_ motions in itself; the one

depends upon the representation of the primary act in itself by the

_special_ rotation; the other re-attempts to regain the primary centre,

through the _general_ rotation around the universal axis.

180. Such a sphere rotating for itself is called _a Heavenly body_. A

heavenly body again is the image or metatype of the Eternal; it is a

whole, it is alive; everything, even the highest, can originate out of

it; everything develop itself out of the coagulated, individualized

æther. The heavenly body has a double life, an individual and an

universal, since it is for itself and at the same time in the general

centre. Every _Individual_ must have a double life.

181. The heavenly bodies are as old as the æther, consequently they

are from the beginning, and endure also without end. As they are only

coagulated æther, so are they susceptible of being resolved into the

same, such as are probably the comets.

b. LIGHT, LINE. (_Second form of the World. Motion._)

182. The æther is from eternity, not merely monas, but also dyas;

from eternity it stands in a state of tension with itself, when, as

the image of the existing primary act, it has emerged out of itself

into two poles. This self-egression or self-manifestation of æther,

or of substance simply, is the self-egression of the point into the

periphery. As dyas, æther exists under the form of polarity, of

central and peripheric effort; the æther in a state of tension is a

centroperipheric antagonism.

183. The æther is separated from eternity into a central and peripheric

substance, and that indeed through its simple position as a globe. The

universe is a duplicity in the form of æther; it is both indifferent

and different æther, both central and peripheric. The central mass

of æther may be called sun, the peripheric planet. Only one sun can

originate in a globe of æther, but many planets.

184. Between the central and peripheral mass of the æther, between the

sun and planets, there is tension. Through this solar-planetary tension

the æther fluctuating between the two becomes polarized.

185. The tension of the æther proceeds from the centre and thus from

the sun. Were the sun to be removed, the polarity of the æther would be

annulled; it would be again the indifferent chaotic æther, the null and

void matter. For the absolute substance to exist it needed not simply

itself, but an identical centre and a dissevered periphery. Is there

no peripheric mass, no planet, so also is the tension annulled; centre

cannot be without periphery, sun not without planet, nor vice versâ.

The tension of æther is thus excited by the sun and conditioned by the

planet. The planet is not the principle, but the Redintegrant of the

tension of æther by the opposition.

186. At that part of the universe where no periphery stands opposed to

centre, no planet to the sun, the æther is not tense, but indifferent,

annulled. There can thus only be columns of æther, which are rendered

tense, namely, those _columns_ of æther which are found between the

sun and the planets. Near to the planets the æther is void of action,

indifferent, non-apparent. There are consequently as many apparent

æther-columns, as there are heavenly bodies, that stand in the process

of polarity opposed to each other. These columns move with the

planets around the suns. The indifferent æther of the world-space is,

therefore, successively rendered tense, as the planets move around

suns, and becomes again indifferent behind the planets.

187. But besides this, that columns of tension only exist, and

therefore that the æther is nowhere active as a sphere, there is still

no spot in the world-space where there would be only indifferent æther,

nothing; for the æther consists of many globes of æther. There is thus

nowhere an indifferent æther, consequently nowhere an empty space. The

idea of the repletion of space is not that of the sphere, but of the

columns of tension, which by their crossing in every direction form a

sphere only externally.

188. That which is thought of as originally filling space is not the

quiescent but only the moved, tensed æther. The former is the void

space, the nothing.

189. The tension of æther is an action, which operates according to the

line. This linear activity, which makes its exit from the central mass

and is excited hence to the peripheral mass, is _Light_, or in short,

light is tension of æther.

190. Light is a traction of lines or radial action; consequently an

antetype of magnetism. A ray of light is a radius. The ray of light

has two extremities different from each other; that turned towards the

sun is 0, that which comes in contact with the planets is ±. Light is,

therefore, a splitting, rending action.

191. Light is the life of the æther. Hitherto the æther was an inactive

nothing, mere substratum for a future. This nothing, when it becomes

centroperipheric, seeks to tear the mathematical point into radii and

circumferences, _appears_; and this centroperipheric manifestation we

call light.

192. The untensed, indifferent æther is, therefore, _darkness_, and

this is the essence, the rest of æther. Chaos was thus darkness; the

world arose out of darkness when light became. Light has originated out

of darkness when the chaos was moved. Were it possible therefore for

all light to vanish, the world would again return into its old nothing;

for darkness and nothing are one. God has separated the light from the

darkness.

193. If light be only a column of æther in a state of tension, light

is or exists only between the planet and the sun; near to the planet

and behind it is darkness. The primary sphere is a dark sphere,

transpierced only by single rays of light. Each star, however, stands

in a state of tension with another; thus many thousand rays of light

stream forth from each, and fill out the world-space in all directions.

There is therefore no absolute darkness, because there are infinitely

numerous rays of light. In the night also there is always as much

light present as is necessary to maintain the heavenly bodies in their

action. For the world there is no night, but only for the planets.

It will be shown that the air maintains its existence simply through

the operation of light; were it therefore always dark, were night

to endure for ever, the air must soon assume another composition or

mixture, and everything that lives in it must fall to ruin. This is

shown also by the diseases and crises of the same.

194. Light is from eternity, for the tense æther was from eternity.

The dark chaos exists only as postulate. Light is time that has become

real, the first manifestation of God; is God himself positing, is

the dyadic God. The dyas is not merely radiality but light; or both

are one, time and light are one, motion and light are one. When God

numbers, when he draws lines, he thus creates light. God becoming

self-conscious is light. Light is God illuminating. Darkness has

accordingly never existed, although the light is derived from the

darkness, like numbers and figures are out of nothing.

195. Light is no matter. There is no substance called light, but the

æther is illuminant through its binary division. The sun does not,

therefore, stream forth when it illumines the planets, and loses

nothing of its magnitude; it is not to be feared that we shall ever

lose it. That the sun is an undulating sea of flame, that it is

throughout a volcano, that combustions or electrical processes of

light, appearing to us as light, occur in its atmosphere; that the

velocity of rotation hurls about the light-particles, and that these

particles scattered in the world-space are, by an unknown route, or by

means of comets, again brought back to the sun, are opinions unworthy

the inquirer into nature. The sun gives out nothing but the impulse,

not, however, the mechanical, which makes the space of heaven tremble

upon which it shines; but the purely spiritual, as the nerves rule the

muscle. The sun can never be extinguished, never become dark; for it

gives out light, not as a fire, but simply by reason of its standing

in the midst; its simple position, its enchainment to the planets is

light. A fire upon the sun would not be perceived by us; it would

not lighten nor warm us, because of its having no relation to us.

The central relation of the sun toward us cannot, however, remain

unobserved, and this observation is even that of light.

196. Matter has become by means of light, is a child of light, is but

illuminating æther. Every binary division of matter manifests itself as

light.

197. The whole universe is transparent, because everything has issued

out of the tension of æther. Everything which is matter is light, and

without light there is nothing. Without light the universe is not

only dark but it is even not. Light is the universe, and every Finite

is only a different position of light. The world is a thoroughly

illuminating globe, a rotating globe of light. The solar system must

have been created according to the laws of light. The phenomena

of the world are only representations of optics, consequently of

living geometry. What we see is nothing but optical construction or

figuration. (Vid. Oken's 'Essay über das Licht;' Jena. Fromann. 1808.)

c. HEAT, DENSITY. (_Third form of the World. Shape._)

198. Light is not simply a motion in itself, a mere continuous

excitation of polarity in the æther, but it is also the æther itself

_set in motion_ thereby. All polar actions resolve themselves finally

into motion of the polarized masses. The end of electricity, galvanism,

magnetism, is motion. It will be, however, shown that all these polar

functions are only repetitions of the primary polarity; this must

therefore produce what the former did, namely, ætherial motion.

199. Every point of the æther becomes polar, every one attracts and

_repels_ the other; whereby motion arises in the innermost parts of

the æther itself. Not a portion of the æther is moved on, but motion

originates in the mass of æther itself. The æther-atoms quit each other.

200. The æther is, however, that which is filling space, is space

itself, the Expansissimum of the world, the Formless and therefore that

which adopts all forms. The formless æther, when it moves itself,

must be connected with a phenomenon, that depends upon its expansion

and identification, which is polarized by light. This action of the

æther does not therefore depend upon the tension of æther, not upon

production from differences in the same, but upon dissolution of the

tension, therefore upon extension, upon the indifferent representation

of space. This action, which is at the same time universal, can only be

heat. Moved æther is _Heat_.

201. Heat is the contest of the indifferent æther with light; light

alone produces heat. Without light the world were not only dark, but

also absolutely cold. Cold is untensed and quiescent æther, death,

nothing; dark and cold are one. Heat is therefore the result of light,

but equally eternal with it; it is space represented really, as that is

real time.

202. Heat is not moved indifferent ether, which is = nothing; but moved

and tensed or the _moved light_.

203. Heat penetrates into thickness as an extending function, but does

not oscillate between two poles like light. It is only the function

of density, and depends upon nothing else, not upon lines or mere

surfaces, but upon the living sphere.

204. Heat and light, although characters of _one_ substance, yet

stand in an antagonism like thickness and line, or as indifference

and difference. Heat is properly the first perfected position of the

primary act, while light is only the act of positing; the latter

therefore is +, the former-. Or also, gravity is the absolute position,

simply = 0; light is the commencing egression of this position out

of itself +-, heat the completion + 0-, and therefore the position

everywhere; it will everywhere deposit, therefore it is motion,

repletion of space, expansion. Light is gravity become real, or 0

become real; 0 however, rendered real, is +-. Heat is as-at the same

time +-and 0, or light and gravity, material light, light that is

filling. Both will also assert the antagonism of their genesis through

all forms of the world. The heat seeks to destroy the line, which the

light endeavours to establish; heat seeks to produce homogeneity in the

Dissimilar, light to effect the reverse. Heat is slow in its motion;

with it the mass of æther must continually move, or move whither it

will operate; light, however, acts spiritually and rapidly, without

motion of the mass, but only glides continually with the latter. Heat

is not created, it is no special matter different from æther. There is

no _body of heat_.

205. Heat is everywhere where the æther is, and must consequently be

regarded as a sphere. Heat is not present merely in the columns of

æther between the heavenly bodies, but everywhere. Therefore heat does

not move itself in the direction of the line, but it extends itself on

all sides, as real space.

FIRE.

206. Light and heat were the first phenomena of the world. Heat with

light, however, are _Fire_. Fire is the totality of æther, is God

manifested in his totality. God, previous to his determination to

create a world, was darkness; in the first act of creation, however, he

appeared as fire. There is no higher, more perfect symbol of divinity

than fire. God's whole consciousness, apart from individual thoughts,

is fire. The Holy Scriptures therefore usually admit of God appearing

under the form of a fire, as a fiery bush, a flame. The world is none

other than a rotating globe of fire.

207. Everything that is, has originated out of fire; everything is

only _cooled_, rigidified fire. As everything has become out of fire,

so must everything to be annihilated have recourse to fire. If finite

things be only fire singly posited, so must every change occurring in

the same be an igneous change. Nothing changes in the world but fire.

The essential change of things take place only by fire.

RETROSPECT.

208. The Triplicity of the primary act in the universe has now been

completely demonstrated. The first manifestation of God is monas; to

this corresponds _Gravity_, _Æther_, darkness, the cold of chaos. The

second manifestation of God is the dyas; to this corresponds the æther

in a state of tension, the _Light_. The third manifestation of God is

the trias; to this corresponds the want of form, _Heat_. _God being in

himself is Gravity_; _acting_, self-emergent, _Light_; _both together_,

or returning into himself, _Heat_. These are the _three Primals_ in the

world, and equal to the three which were prior to the world. They are

the manifested triunity = _Fire_.

Elements of Physiophilosophy · 第 1 / 12 章