WILDWOOD MINSTRELS*

* Parts of this and several other chapters of this book were first

published in The New York Times, whose courtesy in permitting him to

reprint, the author hereby acknowledges.

Nothing affords the bird student more pleasure than settling the identity

of species, albeit sometimes it is hard and patience-trying work. And of

all the birds, none are so provokingly and charmingly elusive as some of

the wood warblers. What a time I had for several years in making sure of

some of these little nymph-like creatures which were flitting about in

the foliage of the trees, concealing themselves by a leafy barrier! Many

a weary chase did they lead me through the woods, and more than once I

almost unjointed my neck by long-continued looking up.

For identifying the tree-top flitters an opera glass is scarcely powerful

enough. A field glass or a Bausch & Lomb binocular is really a

necessity. It draws the bird right down to you, while at the same time

the elusive creature remains at what it regards a safe distance. Its

conduct will therefore not be constrained, and the observer can study it

in its natural poses.

What an enigma the Tennessee warbler for a long time remained to me!

Never still for a moment, yet so indistinctly marked that at a distance

it looks like a dozen other birds one might name--a veritable feathered

rebus. But finally I fixed its place in the avian schedule with the help

of my field glass--white under parts, slightly tinged with yellow, back

and rump olive green, top and sides of head delicate bluish-ash; no

eye-ring, no wing-bars. There is no other warbler marked quite like

that. And yet its song is its most conspicuous mark, so to speak, for it

is a loud, shrill, and very rapidly repeated run, which might be spelled

out in this way: "Chippy, chippy, chippy, chippity-chippity-chippity."

The whole song is emitted at a galloping pace, giving you the impression

that the bird is in a desperate hurry. Important business on hand, no

doubt! Yes, there is a worm or a nit on the under side of that leaf, and

he must nab it now or never! With such pressing business matters on

hand, he has no time for regaling you with "linked sweetness long drawn

out."

Still, he sometimes does prolong his ditty, giving it a saucy,

challenging air. No other warbler sings so loudly. His voice is as

shrill and penetrating as that of the indigo bird, though the song is

quite different in technique.

[Illustration: Yellow Warbler]

Another feathered conundrum was the Nashville warbler, whose back and

head are colored like those of the Tennessee, but whose under parts are

bright yellow, instead of white or white only slightly washed with

yellow; and, besides, sharp peering through your glass will reveal a

distinct white ring encircling the eye. The bird in the hand would also

show a dainty chestnut patch on the crown, but this mark is seldom seen

while it is flitting about in the leafy trees. The songs of the

Nashville and the Tennessee are somewhat similar, but not the same, the

Tennessee's being louder, shriller, and more sharply accentuated, while

his cousin's is more liquid and musical and far less sibilant. My notes

represent the Nashville's song phonetically as follows: "Swee, swee,

swee, ah-wit-ah-wit-ah-wit," delivered rapidly in a high key and with not

a little energy and emphasis. When my notes were made the little lyrist

was putting his best foot forward, and was not high in the trees, so that

I heard him distinctly. The Tennessee warblers were also singing near at

hand, giving me a good opportunity to compare the arias of the two

species.

Belonging to the same subfamily is the orange-crowned warbler. It has

not so marked a preference for trees as its little relatives just

mentioned, but likes, so far as my observation goes, to flit about in

thickets, where it remains in hiding until driven from its covert or

drawn forth by curiosity. Only for a moment does it appear in sight,

then plunges into another covert. You will note that its eye-ring is

yellow, and that its under parts are neither bright yellow, like the

Nashville's, nor white, like the Tennessee's, but greenish yellow

obscurely streaked on the chest. I have never heard the song of the

orange-crown.

There are a number of shy warblers that are especially partial to wild,

unfrequented parts of the woods, where they are seldom disturbed by human

intruders. In Kansas I found them in the deep, densely wooded ravines

running back from the Missouri River and its tributary valleys. Although

these feathered recluses are rarely molested by man, they seem to know

enough about his character to look upon him with a suspicious eye when he

ventures into their sylvan domain. Hence they are hard to study, and it

is not often that their deftly hidden nests can be found.

One of the most delightful of these hermits is the Kentucky warbler. A

brilliant little bird he is, with his golden under parts and superciliary

line, his black patch on the cheek just below the eye, his black cap, and

his coat of iridescent olive green. You will not mistake him for the

Maryland yellow-throat, which also wears a black patch on the side of his

head; but this patch lies over the eye and includes it, and its upper

border is white, while this bird lacks the yellow and curved superciliary

band. Besides, the yellow-throat is not a woodland but a marsh bird.

The Kentucky warbler is attractive in many ways. An industrious

minstrel, his voice is strong and full for so small a bird, and until you

learn to know his tune well, you may mistake it for that of the cardinal.

But, as a piper, he lacks the versatility of the cardinal, who carries a

number of music sheets in his repertory, while the little Kentuckian

confines his lyrical efforts principally to one strain. Sometimes he

delivers his intermittent aria from a low bush or even from the ground,

but his favorite song-perches are the branches of saplings and trees just

below the zone of foliage. Here, in the shadows, you may be compelled to

look for him for some time before you espy his trig little form, and even

then you are likely to see him because he flits to another perch rather

than because you first catch the glint of his colors. Whether he means

it or not, he is something of a ventriloquist, for which reason you will

often look for him in many places before seeing him.

As I have noted, he is an untiring singer. It never occurred to me to

time him, but Dr. Frank M. Chapman has had the patience to do so. "On

one occasion," says this observer, "at Englewood, New Jersey, I watched a

male for three hours. During this period, with the exception of five

interruptions of less than forty-five seconds each, he sang with the

greatest regularity once every twelve seconds. Thus, allowing for the

brief intervals of silence, he sang about 875 times, or some 5,250 notes.

I found him singing, and when I departed he showed no signs of ceasing."

It is such painstaking observations that add something new and fresh to

our knowledge of birds.

The Kentucky warbler is fond of walking about on the ground in the woods,

seeking for his favorite insects. As you slowly follow, you will now and

then catch a glimpse of him through the apertures of the leaves; then he

will again disappear beneath his canvas of green. Thus he pursues his

quest hour after hour, and you may hear the rustle of his tiny feet upon

the carpet of dead leaves. Is it only a notion of mine, or am I correct,

in thinking that his promenades on the ground are mostly taken early in

the spring before there is danger from snakes?

I like the pretty Kentuckians, but must grant you that in some respects

they are quite exasperating, never inclined to be as confiding as some

other birds. And then most birds will sooner or later betray the

presence of their nests, but the Kentucky warblers seldom do so, knowing

too well how to keep their procreant secrets. They have evidently

learned the use of strategy, as you will see: One day a pair began to

chirp vigorously as I approached their demesne in a lonely hollow, and I

felt a thrill of joy at the prospect of finding a nest. One of them even

flitted about with a worm in its bill--a sure sign of nestlings in the

neighborhood. For nearly four hours I watched the chirping couple, and

peered, as I thought, into every nook and cranny of the place, but all in

vain; neither nest nor bantlings could I find. Yet in some way that

seemed almost mysterious enough to be uncanny, the mother bird got rid of

the tidbit which she held in her bill. She probably decided to eat it

herself rather than betray the whereabouts of her younglings. I have

seen more than one parent bird do that.

A few days later, in the same hollow, a Kentucky warbler was singing

contentedly, showing no signs of uneasiness. The female was not to be

seen or heard. I stalked about a long time, hoping to flush her from her

nest, but all my efforts were as futile that day as they had been on my

previous visit. In another hollow, on the same day, I watched a Kentucky

warbler flitting about with a worm in her bill. Again and again she

disappeared somewhere in the tanglewood, and came back with an empty bill

to chirp her disapproval of my spying; but look as I would in the very

places where she went down, I could discover no nest. In Warbledom it is

evidently no violation of ethical principles to act a lie in order to

protect a nestful of bantlings.

But my story is not to have a disappointing ending, after all, for in the

spring and summer of 1902 my stars became auspicious, and I found three

Kentucky warblers' nests that were tenanted and several more that were

already deserted. Perhaps the turning of my luck was due not so much to

accident as to the fact that I had "caught on," and knew more about their

ruses. One of the nests discovered is worth describing.

It was on a hilltop in Kansas, blown by the freshest breezes that sweep

over the limitless prairies. An ideal spot, indeed, for the nesting of

birds that love lone places. In one of my rambles I found this pleasant

elevation, and was attracted by the possibilities it offered for bird

study. Presently a male Kentucky warbler appeared with a couple of large

worms in his beak, and I made up my mind to find his nest if perseverance

could accomplish that object. So I sat down in the shade of a tree and

watched the bird closely. Now note his admirable finesse. After

flitting about among the bushes for a minute or two, chirping his protest

at my presence, he descended into the copse below and disappeared. Of

course, any student of birds would have supposed that he had gone down

near the nest to feed his bairns, and that he only needed to go and

examine the place to discover the little avian secret. My pulses

thrilled more than a little as I began my search for the nest right where

the bird had descended into the thicket. But do you know that my most

strenuous efforts--and they _were_ strenuous on a hot day like

that--resulted only in disappointment? The nest was not to be found

within a radius of a rod from the point where the little diplomat went

down. A few days later I made my way to the hilltop, and do you know

that the shrewd bird played me the same trick? He scuttled down into the

bushes at almost the same point as before, and no nest rewarded my

search. I went home just about ready to give up my search for Kentucky

warblers' nests, for I had been hunting them for a number of years

without success.

However, in a few days I found my way again to the breezy hilltop. The

chats, vireos, and indigo birds gave due warning of my approach, and I

felt sure that Master Kentucky and his mate would be on their guard. To

my delight, in a few minutes the female presented herself in one of the

trees, her bill holding a bunch of worms. Luckily she was not so wary or

diplomatic as her husband, and, in addition, she extremely anxious to

feed her hungry babies. Instead of going over to the copse where the

male bird had played me such a clever trick, she flew down the path about

four rods to a small scrub oak, from which she soon dropped into the

weeds below. Then I said to myself; "Aha!" and smiled in a knowing way.

I walked down the path to the tree, but no Kentucky warblers were to be

seen--not right away. So I sat down in the path and waited to see what

would happen. It was only a short time till the female appeared, with a

telltale bunch of worms in her beak. A moment later her mate also

arrived, carrying a small worm in the usual way. The situation was

growing interesting. The two birdlets chirped and flitted about in the

tree for a long time, afraid to go down to the nest. I moved slowly and

cautiously farther up the path to give them a better chance to divulge

their secret. Presently the pretty madame summoned courage to drop to a

lower perch in the tree, then to a still lower one, then to the top of

one of the bushes below, and at last into the weed clump and out of sight.

I wasted no time. In a minute I was pressing the weeds apart and looking

down admiringly into the little cot with its four half-fledged

occupants--the first Kentucky warbler's nest I had ever seen. Set upon

the ground, its bulky foundation of dry leaves supported the cup proper,

which was lined with fine grass. Easy enough to find when you knew

precisely where to look for it.

Think now of the little game the male bird had played me on my previous

visits to the haunt! He had descended into the copse about four rods

distant from the nest instead of going down near its site; then he had

doubtless followed a secret pathway through the weeds and bushes to the

nest, fed his children, and hurried away without letting himself be seen.

The parent birds did not like the idea of my finding and inspecting their

nest, for they chirped and darted about in a panic. To relieve their

anguish I retired up the slope a short distance, seated myself in the

pleasant shade of a scrub oak, and made an entry of my find in my

notebook. Alas! I had probably done harm to my little friends without

intending it, for their chirping attracted the attention of one of their

worst foes, and drew him to the spot. I loitered about for perhaps ten

minutes, and then decided to take one more peep at the pretty domicile

before leaving the hilltop. As I drew near, I observed that the parent

birds were chirping in a low, but heart-broken way, as if they were

almost stricken dumb with terror. Were they so badly frightened because

I was returning to their nest?

I stepped up cautiously and looked down at the nest. It was now my turn

to give vent to a cry of consternation, for what I saw was this: A large

blacksnake coiled about the nest, the fold of his neck wabbling to and

fro in a terrifying way, while with his mouth he was trying to seize one

of the bantlings. Fortunately I had a good-sized stick, almost a club,

in my hand, and I wasted no time in bringing it down with all the force I

could command upon the serpent, taking care to deliver the blow at the

side of the nest. The snake tried to uncoil, but another blow broke his

backbone, if indeed the first one had not done so, and he was in my

power. He had swallowed one of the nestlings, but three were left, and

seemed to be in good condition. On my return to the place a few days

later the nest was empty, and I fear that the remaining little ones had

also been destroyed, perhaps by the mate of the snake from which I had

rescued them.

On the shelf of a steep bluff covered with a riot of bushes and briars a

pair of hooded warblers found a dwelling place to their taste in the

spring of 1900. This handsome birdlet may be known by his dainty yellow

hood, bordered with black, and cannot be mistaken for any other member of

the great feathered fraternity. One cannot look at him without feeling

that Nature tried to see what she could do in the way of an unusual

arrangement of colors. Who can tell what impelled her to make a living

gem like this, as odd as it is beautiful?

On the side of the bluff referred to I was first attracted by the

vivacious song of the little male, which I had not heard for several

years--not since an excursion I had taken into Louisiana and Mississippi.

His voice was clear and ringing, and the tune he executed was by no means

a meager performance.

One day a loud, metallic chirping was heard, and presently two hooded

warblers appeared, each with the proverbial green worm in its beak. I

decided to remain in the nook and watch, for the nesting habits of these

rare warblers were new to me. In and out, up and down, here and there,

they flitted, making a checker-work of black and gold amid the foliage,

craning their necks, peering at me with anxious inquiry in their dark

little eyes, and filling the woodland with their uneasy chirping.

It was a long time to wait, but at length patience had its reward; one of

the birds flew down to the bushes on the steep slope above me and fed a

youngster in plain view. No time was lost in pushing through the bushy

tangle to the magic spot. Behold! it was a young cowbird that had been

fed by the devoted little mother! That was trying beyond expression--to

think that all the efforts of the pretty couple, all their intense

solicitude, was wasted on a great, hulking impostor like the cowbird. He

had just scrambled from the nest, from which he had doubtless previously

crowded the rightful heirs of the family to perish from starvation on the

ground. I found the nest only about a foot away from the perch of the

young bird--a deep, neat little basket, compactly felted with down and

plant fibers, set in the crotch of a slender bush of the thicket. It was

certainly too small to accommodate any tenants besides the strapping

young cowbird. In the spring of 1902 another hooded warbler's nest

rewarded my search. Its holdings were four callow bantlings, all of

which were carried off by some marauder before my next visit.

Another little charmer of the woodland, especially of thick second-growth

timber, is the blue-winged warbler, which glories in the high-sounding

Latin name of _Helminthophila pinus_. Wherever seen, he would attract

attention on account of the peculiar cut and color of his clothes. A

conspicuous black line reaching from the corner of the mouth back through

the eye is a diagnostic feature of his plumage, while his crown and

breast gleam in bright yellow, almost golden in the sunshine; his wings

and tail are blue-gray, with some white trimmings, and his back and rump

are bright olive There you have an array of colors that makes a picture

indeed. Madame Blue-wing wears the same pattern as her lord, but the

hues are less brilliant.

The manners of Sir Blue-wing--I call him so because of his distinguished

air--are interesting, for they differ, in one respect at least, from

those of most of the other warblers of my acquaintance. He flits about

among the branches in rather a leisurely way--for a warbler; but his main

characteristic is his unwarbler-like fashion of clinging back downward to

the under side of the twigs, after the manner of the chickadee, in order

to secure the nits and worms under the leaves. He acts decidedly like a

diminutive trapeze performer.

His song consists of an insect-like buzz, divided into stanzas of two

syllables each, with a pensive strain running through it, as if the heart

of the little singer were filled with sadness. While it sounds rather

faint at a distance, close at hand it has a strangely penetrating quality.

Although my numerous efforts to find a blue-wing's nest were unavailing,

I had the satisfaction of proving beyond doubt that these birds breed in

northeastern Kansas. A quaint, squeaking call attracted my attention one

day, and I found that it proceeded from the throat of a young blue-wing

perched in the bushes, for presently the mamma came and thrust a morsel

into the open mouth of the bantling. Some young birds sit quietly and

patiently, waiting for their rations, and utter only a faint twitter when

they are fed; but the youthful blue-wings are not of so contented and

silent a disposition. On the contrary, they are noisy little fellows,

making their presence known to friend and foe alike, although they are

very careful never to permit the human observer to come too close. They

are duly warned of danger by their ever-vigilant parents. Sometimes a

youngster will sit on the same perch for a long time, preening his

feathers and uttering a little call at intervals, just to keep in

practice, as it were; while at other times he will pursue his parents

about in the woods, loudly demanding his dinner. One season I succeeded

in finding at least five pairs of these warblers, in company with their

clamorous broods. The nest is set on the ground in the bushes and grass

of second-growth timber tracts. Lined with tendrils and fine strips of

bark, it is "firmly wrapped with numerous leaves, whose stems point

upward." Another haunter of the dusky depths of the woods is the

ovenbird. His song is one of the most peculiar in warblerdom. Beginning

in moderate tones, it grows louder and louder as it nears the end, and

really seems like a voice moving toward you. This bird also walks about

in the woods, and does not hop, as most of his relatives do. As he walks

about on his leafy carpet, his head erect, he has quite a consequential

air. He derives his name from the fact that his nest, set on the ground,

is globular in form, with the entrance at one side, giving it the

appearance of a small oven.

The gay redstarts, which seem to be so tame and confiding in the early

spring, turn into veritable eremites in the breeding season, seeking the

most secluded portions of the woods as their habitat. Their little nests

are harder to find than one would suppose; yet I have had the good

fortune to watch two females erecting the walls of their tiny cottages,

and a pretty sight it was.

The redstart has some interesting ways. One of them is his habit of

spreading out his wings and tail as he perches or flits about in the

trees, as if he were anxious to display the fiery trimmings that so

elegantly set off his little black suit. Blood will tell, for I have

seen the young redstarts imitating their parents by spreading out their

odd, croppy tails in a comical way.

[Illustration: Chickadee]

How early in life young birds are taught some of the lessons that are

needful for their own safety! One day I heard a young redstart chirping

for his dinner. I quietly thrust my head into the thicket, and soon

espied the birdkin perched on a twig only about a rod away. He either

did not see me, or else decided that I was not a bugaboo. A few minutes

later the mother darted into the enclosure and fed her baby. She was too

much absorbed in her duties to notice me until the repast was over; then

she suddenly caught sight of her unwelcome caller. She stood transfixed

with astonishment for one breathless moment, then uttered a piercing cry

of alarm that sent the little one dashing away like a streak of

lightning. Plainly the youngster understood his mamma's signal, for

until she uttered it he had sat perfectly quiet and unconcerned, perhaps

not even aware of my presence. Birds are taught the language of fear at

a tender age. Of course they learn it so readily because there is a

basis of timidity in their natures, implanted by heredity.

Our Bird Comrades · 第 25 / 40 题