CHAPTER V.

BYZANTINE PALACES.

§ I. The account of the architecture of St. Mark's given in the previous

chapter has, I trust, acquainted the reader sufficiently with the spirit

of the Byzantine style: but he has probably, as yet, no clear idea of

its generic forms. Nor would it be safe to define these after an

examination of St. Mark's alone, built as it was upon various models,

and at various periods. But if we pass through the city, looking for

buildings which resemble St. Mark's--first, in the most important

feature of incrustation; secondly, in the character of the

mouldings,--we shall find a considerable number, not indeed very

attractive in their first address to the eye, but agreeing perfectly,

both with each other, and with the earliest portions of St. Mark's, in

every important detail; and to be regarded, therefore, with profound

interest, as indeed the remains of an ancient city of Venice, altogether

different in aspect from that which now exists. From these remains we

may with safety deduce general conclusions touching the forms of

Byzantine architecture, as practised in Eastern Italy, during the

eleventh, twelfth, and thirteenth centuries.

§ II. They agree in another respect, as well as in style. All are either

ruins, or fragments disguised by restoration. Not one of them is

uninjured or unaltered; and the impossibility of finding so much as an

angle or a single story in perfect condition is a proof, hardly less

convincing than the method of their architecture, that they were indeed

raised during the earliest phases of the Venetian power. The mere

fragments, dispersed in narrow streets, and recognizable by a single

capital, or the segment of an arch, I shall not enumerate: but, of

important remains, there are six in the immediate neighborhood of the

Rialto, one in the Rio di Ca' Foscari, and one conspicuously placed

opposite the great Renaissance Palace known as the Vendramin Calerghi,

one of the few palaces still inhabited[41] and well maintained; and

noticeable, moreover, as having a garden beside it, rich with

evergreens, and decorated by gilded railings and white statues that cast

long streams of snowy reflection down into the deep water. The vista of

canal beyond is terminated by the Church of St. Geremia, another but

less attractive work of the Renaissance; a mass of barren brickwork,

with a dull leaden dome above, like those of our National Gallery. So

that the spectator has the richest and meanest of the late architecture

of Venice before him at once: the richest, let him observe, a piece of

private luxury; the poorest, that which was given to God. Then, looking

to the left, he will see the fragment of the work of earlier ages,

testifying against both, not less by its utter desolation than by the

nobleness of the traces that are still left of it.

§ III. It is a ghastly ruin; whatever is venerable or sad in its wreck

being disguised by attempts to put it to present uses of the basest

kind. It has been composed of arcades borne by marble shafts, and walls

of brick faced with marble: but the covering stones have been torn away

from it like the shroud from a corpse; and its walls, rent into a

thousand chasms, are filled and refilled with fresh brickwork, and the

seams and hollows are choked with clay and whitewash, oozing and

trickling over the marble,--itself blanched into dusty decay by the

frosts of centuries. Soft grass and wandering leafage have rooted

themselves in the rents, but they are not suffered to grow in their own

wild and gentle way, for the place is in a sort inhabited; rotten

partitions are nailed across its corridors, and miserable rooms

contrived in its western wing; and here and there the weeds are

indolently torn down, leaving their haggard fibres to struggle again

into unwholesome growth when the spring next stirs them: and thus, in

contest between death and life, the unsightly heap is festering to its

fall.

Of its history little is recorded, and that little futile. That it once

belonged to the dukes of Ferrara, and was bought from them in the

sixteenth century, to be made a general receptacle for the goods of the

Turkish merchants, whence it is now generally known as the Fondaco, or

Fontico, de' Turchi, are facts just as important to the antiquary, as

that, in the year 1852, the municipality of Venice allowed its lower

story to be used for a "deposito di Tabacchi." Neither of this, nor of

any other remains of the period, can we know anything but what their own

stones will tell us.

§ IV. The reader will find in Appendix 11, written chiefly for the

traveller's benefit, an account of the situation and present state of

the other seven Byzantine palaces. Here I shall only give a general

account of the most interesting points in their architecture.

They all agree in being round-arched and incrusted with marble, but

there are only six in which the original disposition of the parts is

anywise traceable; namely, those distinguished in the Appendix as the

Fondaco de' Turchi, Casa Loredan, Caso Farsetti, Rio-Foscari House,

Terraced House, and Madonnetta House:[42] and these six agree farther in

having continuous arcades along their entire fronts from one angle to

the other, and in having their arcades divided, in each case, into a

centre and wings; both by greater size in the midmost arches, and by the

alternation of shafts in the centre, with pilasters, or with small

shafts, at the flanks.

§ V. So far as their structure can be traced, they agree also in having

tall and few arches in their lower stories, and shorter and more

numerous arches above: but it happens most unfortunately that in the

only two cases in which the second stories are left the ground floors

are modernized, and in the others where the sea stories are left the

second stories are modernized; so that we never have more than two

tiers of the Byzantine arches, one above the other. These, however, are

quite enough to show the first main point on which I wish to insist,

namely, the subtlety of the feeling for proportion in the Greek

architects; and I hope that even the general reader will not allow

himself to be frightened by the look of a few measurements, for, if he

will only take the little pains necessary to compare them, he will, I am

almost certain, find the result not devoid of interest.

[Illustration: Fig. IV.]

§ VI. I had intended originally to give elevations of all these palaces;

but have not had time to prepare plates requiring so much labor and

care. I must, therefore, explain the position of their parts in the

simplest way in my power.

The Fondaco de' Turchi has sixteen arches in its sea story, and

twenty-six above them in its first story, the whole based on a

magnificent foundation, built of blocks of red marble, some of them

seven feet long by a foot and a half thick, and raised to a height of

about five feet above high-water mark. At this level, the elevation of

one half of the building, from its flank to the central pillars of its

arcades, is rudely given in Fig. IV., in the previous page. It is only

drawn to show the arrangement of the parts, as the sculptures which are

indicated by the circles and upright oblongs between the arches are too

delicate to be shown in a sketch three times the size of this. The

building once was crowned with an Arabian parapet; but it was taken down

some years since, and I am aware of no authentic representation of its

details. The greater part of the sculptures between the arches,

indicated in the woodcut only by blank circles, have also fallen, or

been removed, but enough remain on the two flanks to justify the

representation given in the diagram of their original arrangement.

And now observe the dimensions. The small arches of the wings in the

ground story, _a_, _a_, _a_, measure, in breadth, from

Ft. In.

shaft to shaft 4 5

interval _b_ 7 6½

interval _c_ 7 11

intervals _d_, _e_, _f_, &c. 8 1

The difference between the width of the arches _b_ and _c_ is

necessitated by the small recess of the cornice on the left hand as

compared with that of the great capitals; but this sudden difference of

half a foot between the two extreme arches of the centre offended the

builder's eye, so he diminished the next one, _unnecessarily_, two

inches, and thus obtained the gradual cadence to the flanks, from eight

feet down to four and a half, in a series of continually increasing

steps. Of course the effect cannot be shown in the diagram, as the first

difference is less than the thickness of its lines. In the upper story

the capitals are all nearly of the same height, and there was no

occasion for the difference between the extreme arches. Its twenty-six

arches are placed, four small ones above each lateral three of the lower

arcade, and eighteen larger above the central ten; thus throwing the

shafts into all manner of relative positions, and completely confusing

the eye in any effort to count them: but there is an exquisite symmetry

running through their apparent confusion; for it will be seen that the

four arches in each flank are arranged in two groups, of which one has a

large single shaft in the centre, and the other a pilaster and two small

shafts. The way in which the large shaft is used as an echo of those in

the central arcade, dovetailing them, as it were, into the system of the

pilasters,--just as a great painter, passing from one tone of color to

another, repeats, over a small space, that which he has left,--is highly

characteristic of the Byzantine care in composition. There are other

evidences of it in the arrangement of the capitals, which will be

noticed below in the seventh chapter. The lateral arches of this upper

arcade measure 3 ft. 2 in. across, and the central 3 ft. 11 in., so that

the arches in the building are altogether of six magnitudes.

§ VII. Next let us take the Casa Loredan. The mode of arrangement of its

pillars is precisely like that of the Fondaco de' Turchi, so that I

shall merely indicate them by vertical lines in order to be able to

letter the intervals. It has five arches in the centre of the lower

story, and two in each of its wings.

[Illustration]

Ft. In.

The midmost interval, _a_, of the central five, is 6 1

The two on each side, _b_, _b_ 5 2

The two extremes, _c_, _c_ 4 9

Inner arches of the wings, _d_, _d_ 4 4

Outer arches of the wings, _e_, _e_ 4 6

The gradation of these dimensions is visible at a glance; the boldest

step being here taken nearest the centre, while in the Fondaco it is

farthest from the centre. The first loss here is of eleven inches, the

second of five, the third of five, and then there is a most subtle

increase of two inches in the extreme arches, as if to contradict the

principle of diminution, and stop the falling away of the building by

firm resistance at its flanks.

I could not get the measures of the upper story accurately, the palace

having been closed all the time I was in Venice; but it has seven

central arches above the five below, and three at the flanks above the

two below, the groups being separated by double shafts.

§ VIII. Again, in the Casa Farsetti, the lower story has a centre of

five arches, and wings of two. Referring, therefore, to the last figure,

which will answer for this palace also, the measures of the intervals

are:

Ft. In.

_a_ 8 0

_b_ 5 10

_c_ 5 4

_d_ and _e_ 5 3

It is, however, possible that the interval _c_ and the wing arches may

have been intended to be similar; for one of the wing arches measures 5

ft. 4 in. We have thus a simpler proportion than any we have hitherto

met with; only two losses taking place, the first of 2 ft. 2 in., the

second of 6 inches.

The upper story has a central group of seven arches, whose widths are 4

ft. 1 in.

Ft. In.

The next arch on each side 3 5

The three arches of each wing 3 6

Here again we have a most curious instance of the subtlety of eye which

was not satisfied without a third dimension, but _could_ be satisfied

with a difference of an inch on three feet and a half.

§ IX. In the Terraced House, the ground floor is modernized, but the

first story is composed of a centre of five arches, with wings of two,

measuring as follows:

Ft. In.

Three midmost arches of the central group 4 0

Outermost arch of the central group 4 6

Innermost arch of the wing 4 10

Outermost arch of the wing[43] 5 0

Here the greatest step is towards the centre; but the increase, which is

unusual, is towards the outside, the gain being successively six, four,

and two inches.

I could not obtain the measures of the second story, in which only the

central group is left; but the two outermost arches are visibly larger

than the others, thus beginning a correspondent proportion to the one

below, of which the lateral quantities have been destroyed by

restorations.

§ X. Finally, in the Rio-Foscari House, the central arch is the

principal feature, and the four lateral ones form one magnificent wing;

the dimensions being from the centre to the side:

Ft. In.

Central arch 9 9

Second " 3 8

Third " 3 10

Fourth " 3 10

Fifth " 3 8

The difference of two inches on nearly three feet in the two midmost

arches being all that was necessary to satisfy the builder's eye.

§ XI. I need not point out to the reader that these singular and minute

harmonies of proportion indicate, beyond all dispute, not only that the

buildings in which they are found are of one school, but (so far as

these subtle coincidences of measurement can still be traced in them) in

their original form. No modern builder has any idea of connecting his

arches in this manner, and restorations in Venice are carried on with

too violent hands to admit of the supposition that such refinements

would be even noticed in the progress of demolition, much less imitated

in heedless reproduction. And as if to direct our attention especially

to this character, as indicative of Byzantine workmanship, the most

interesting example of all will be found in the arches of the front of

St. Mark's itself, whose proportions I have not noticed before, in order

that they might here be compared with those of the contemporary palaces.

[Illustration: Fig. V.]

§ XII. The doors actually employed for entrance in the western façade

are as usual five, arranged as at _a_ in the annexed woodcut, Fig. V.;

but the Byzantine builder could not be satisfied with so simple a group,

and he introduced, therefore, two minor arches at the extremities, as at

_b_, by adding two small porticos which are of _no use whatever_ except

to consummate the proportions of the façade, and themselves to exhibit

the most exquisite proportions in arrangements of shaft and archivolt

with which I am acquainted in the entire range of European architecture.

Into these minor particulars I cannot here enter; but observe the

dimensions of the range of arches in the façade, as thus completed by

the flanking porticos:

Ft. In.

The space of its central archivolt is 31 8

" the two on each side, about[44] 19 8

" the two succeeding, about 20 4

" small arches at flanks, about 6 0

[Illustration: Fig. VI.]

I need not make any comment upon the subtle difference of eight inches

on twenty feet between the second and third dimensions. If the reader

will be at the pains to compare the whole evidence now laid before him,

with that deduced above from the apse of Murano, he cannot but confess

that it amounts to an irrefragable proof of an intense perception of

harmony in the relation of quantities, on the part of the Byzantine

architects; a perception which we have at present lost so utterly as

hardly to be able even to conceive it. And let it not be said, as it was

of the late discoveries of subtle curvature in the Parthenon,[45] that

what is not to be demonstrated without laborious measurement, cannot

have influence on the beauty of the design. The eye is continually

influenced by what it cannot detect; nay, it is not going too far to

say, that it is most influenced by what it detects least. Let the

painter define, if he can, the variations of lines on which depend the

changes of expression in the human countenance. The greater he is, the

more he will feel their subtlety, and the intense difficulty of

perceiving all their relations, or answering for the consequences of a

variation of a hair's breadth in a single curve. Indeed, there is

nothing truly noble either in color or in form, but its power depends on

circumstances infinitely too intricate to be explained, and almost too

subtle to be traced. And as for these Byzantine buildings, we only do

not feel them because we do not _watch_ them; otherwise we should as

much enjoy the variety of proportion in their arches, as we do at

present that of the natural architecture of flowers and leaves. Any of

us can feel in an instant the grace of the leaf group, _b_, in the

annexed figure; and yet that grace is simply owing to its being

proportioned like the façade of St. Mark's; each leaflet answering to an

arch,--the smallest at the root, to those of the porticos. I have tried

to give the proportion quite accurately in _b_; but as the difference

between the second and third leaflets is hardly discernible on so small

a scale, it is somewhat exaggerated in _a_.[46] Nature is often far more

subtle in her proportions. In looking at some of the nobler species of

lilies, full in the front of the flower, we may fancy for a moment that

they form a symmetrical six-petaled star; but on examining them more

closely, we shall find that they are thrown into a group of three

magnitudes by the expansion of two of the inner petals above the stamens

to a breadth greater than any of the four others; while the third inner

petal, on which the stamens rest, contracts itself into the narrowest of

the six, and the three under petals remain of one intermediate

magnitude, as seen in the annexed figure.

[Illustration: Fig. VII.]

§ XIII. I must not, however, weary the reader with this subject, which

has always been a favorite one with me, and is apt to lead too far; we

will return to the palaces on the Grand Canal. Admitting, then, that

their fragments are proved, by the minute correspondences of their

arrangement, to be still in their original positions, they indicate to

us a form, whether of palace or dwelling-house, in which there were,

universally, central galleries, or loggias, opening into apartments on

each wing, the amount of light admitted being immense; and the general

proportions of the building, slender, light, and graceful in the utmost

degree, it being in fact little more than an aggregate of shafts and

arches. Of the interior disposition of these palaces there is in no

instance the slightest trace left, nor am I well enough acquainted with

the existing architecture of the East to risk any conjecture on this

subject. I pursue the statement of the facts which still are

ascertainable respecting their external forms.

§ XIV. In every one of the buildings above mentioned, except the

Rio-Foscari House (which has only one great entrance between its wings),

the central arcades are sustained, at least in one story, and generally

in both, on bold detached cylindrical shafts, with rich capitals, while

the arches of the wings are carried on smaller shafts assisted by

portions of wall, which become pilasters of greater or less width.

And now I must remind the reader of what was pointed out above (Vol. I.

Chap. XXVII. §§ III. XXXV. XL.), that there are two great orders of

capitals in the world; that one of these is convex in its contour, the

other concave; and that richness of ornament, with all freedom of fancy,

is for the most part found in the one, and severity of ornament, with

stern discipline of the fancy, in the other.

Of these two families of capitals both occur in the Byzantine period,

but the concave group is the longest-lived, and extends itself into the

Gothic times. In the account which I gave of them in the first volume,

they were illustrated by giving two portions of a simple curve, that of

a salvia leaf. We must now investigate their characters more in detail;

and these may be best generally represented by considering both families

as formed upon the types of flowers,--the one upon that of the

water-lily, the other upon that of the convolvulus. There was no

intention in the Byzantine architects to imitate either one or the other

of these flowers; but, as I have already so often repeated, all

beautiful works of art must either intentionally imitate or accidentally

resemble natural forms; and the direct comparison with the natural forms

which these capitals most resemble, is the likeliest mode of fixing

their distinctions in the reader's mind.

The one then, the convex family, is modelled according to the commonest

shapes of that great group of flowers which form rounded cups, like that

of the water-lily, the leaves springing horizontally from the stalk, and

closing together upwards. The rose is of this family, but her cup is

filled with the luxuriance of her leaves; the crocus, campanula,

ranunculus, anemone, and almost all the loveliest children of the field,

are formed upon the same type.

The other family resembles the convolvulus, trumpet-flower, and such

others, in which the lower part of the bell is slender, and the lip

curves outwards at the top. There are fewer flowers constructed on this

than on the convex model; but in the organization of trees and of

clusters of herbage it is seen continually. Of course, both of these

conditions are modified, when applied to capitals, by the enormously

greater thickness of the stalk or shaft, but in other respects the

parallelism is close and accurate; and the reader had better at once fix

the flower outlines in his mind,[47] and remember them as representing

the only two orders of capitals that the world has ever seen, or can

see.

§ XV. The examples of the concave family in the Byzantine times are

found principally either in large capitals founded on the Greek

Corinthian, used chiefly for the nave pillars of churches, or in the

small lateral shafts of the palaces. It appears somewhat singular that

the pure Corinthian form should have been reserved almost exclusively

for nave pillars, as at Torcello, Murano, and St. Mark's; it occurs,

indeed, together with almost every other form, on the exterior of St.

Mark's also, but never so definitely as in the nave and transept shafts.

Of the conditions assumed by it at Torcello enough has been said; and

one of the most delicate of the varieties occurring in St. Mark's is

given in Plate VIII., fig. 15, remarkable for the cutting of the sharp

thistle-like leaves into open relief, so that the light sometimes shines

through them from behind, and for the beautiful curling of the

extremities of the leaves outwards, joining each other at the top, as in

an undivided flower.

§ XVI. The other characteristic examples of the concave groups in the

Byzantine times are as simple as those resulting from the Corinthian are

rich. They occur on the _small_ shafts at the flanks of the Fondaco de'

Turchi, the Casa Farsetti, Casa Loredan, Terraced House, and upper

story of the Madonnetta House, in forms so exactly similar that the two

figures 1 and 2 in Plate VIII. may sufficiently represent them all. They

consist merely of portions cut out of the plinths or string-courses

which run along all the faces of these palaces, by four truncations in

the form of arrowy leaves (fig. 1, Fondaco de' Turchi), and the whole

rounded a little at the bottom so as to fit the shaft. When they occur

between two arches they assume the form of the group fig. 2 (Terraced

House). Fig. 3 is from the central arches of the Casa Farsetti, and is

only given because either it is a later restoration or a form absolutely

unique in the Byzantine period.

[Illustration: Plate VII.

BYZANTINE CAPITALS. CONVEX GROUP.]

§ XVII. The concave group, however, was not naturally pleasing to the

Byzantine mind. Its own favorite capital was of the bold convex or

cushion shape, so conspicuous in all the buildings of the period that I

have devoted Plate VII., opposite, entirely to its illustration. The

form in which it is first used is practically obtained from a square

block laid on the head of the shaft (fig. 1, Plate VII.), by first

cutting off the lower corners, as in fig. 2, and then rounding the

edges, as in fig. 3; this gives us the bell stone: on this is laid a

simple abacus, as seen in fig. 4, which is the actual form used in the

upper arcade of Murano, and the framework of the capital is complete.

Fig. 5 shows the general manner and effect of its decoration on the same

scale; the other figures, 6 and 7, both from the apse of Murano, 8, from

the Terraced House, and 9, from the Baptistery of St. Mark's, show the

method of chiselling the surfaces in capitals of average richness, such

as occur everywhere, for there is no limit to the fantasy and beauty of

the more elaborate examples.

§ XVIII. In consequence of the peculiar affection entertained for these

massy forms by the Byzantines, they were apt, when they used any

condition of capital founded on the Corinthian, to modify the concave

profile by making it bulge out at the bottom. Fig. 1, _a_, Plate X., is

the profile of a capital of the pure concave family; and observe, it

needs a fillet or cord round the neck of the capital to show where it

separates from the shaft. Fig. 4, _a_, on the other hand, is the

profile of the pure convex group, which not only needs no such

projecting fillet, but would be encumbered by it; while fig. 2, _a_, is

the profile of one of the Byzantine capitals (Fondaco de' Turchi, lower

arcade) founded on Corinthian, of which the main sweep is concave, but

which bends below into the convex bell-shape, where it joins the shaft.

And, lastly, fig. 3, _a_, is the profile of the nave shafts of St.

Mark's, where, though very delicately granted, the concession to the

Byzantine temper is twofold; first at the spring of the curve from the

base, and secondly the top, where it again becomes convex, though the

expression of the Corinthian bell is still given to it by the bold

concave leaves.

§ XIX. These, then, being the general modifications of Byzantine

profiles, I have thrown together in Plate VIII., opposite, some of the

most characteristic examples of the decoration of the concave and

transitional types; their localities are given in the note below,[48]

and the following are the principal points to be observed respecting

them.

The purest concave forms, 1 and 2, were never decorated in the earliest

times, except sometimes by an incision or rib down the centre of their

truncations on the angles.

[Illustration: Plate VIII.

BYZANTINE CAPITALS. CONCAVE GROUP.]

Figures 4, 5, 6, and 7 show some of the modes of application of a

peculiarly broad-lobed acanthus leaf, very characteristic of native

Venetian work; 4 and 5 are from the same building, two out of a group of

four, and show the boldness of the variety admitted in the management

even of the capitals most closely derived from the Corinthian. I never

saw one of these Venetian capitals in all respects like another. The

trefoils into which the leaves fall at the extremities are, however, for

the most part similar, though variously disposed, and generally niche

themselves one under the other, as very characteristically in fig. 7.

The form 8 occurs in St. Mark's only, and there very frequently: 9 at

Venice occurs, I think, in St. Mark's only; but it is a favorite early

Lombardic form. 10, 11, and 12 are all highly characteristic. 10 occurs

with more fantastic interweaving upon its sides in the upper stories of

St. Mark's; 11 is derived, in the Casa Loredan, from the great lily

capitals of St. Mark's, of which more presently. 13 and 15 are peculiar

to St. Mark's. 14 is a lovely condition, occurring both there and in the

Fondaco de' Turchi.

The modes in which the separate portions of the leaves are executed in

these and other Byzantine capitals, will be noticed more at length

hereafter. Here I only wish the reader to observe two things, both with

respect to these and the capitals of the convex family on the former

Plate: first the Life, secondly, the Breadth, of these capitals, as

compared with Greek forms.

§ XX. I say, first, the Life. Not only is every one of these capitals

differently fancied, but there are many of them which _have no two sides

alike_. Fig. 5, for instance, varies on every side in the arrangement of

the pendent leaf in its centre; fig. 6 has a different plant on each of

its four upper angles. The birds are each cut with a different play of

plumage in figs. 9 and 12, and the vine-leaves are every one varied in

their position in fig. 13. But this is not all. The differences in the

character of ornamentation between them and the Greek capitals, all show

a greater love of nature; the leaves are, every one of them, more

founded on realities, sketched, however rudely, more directly from the

truth; and are continually treated in a manner which shows the mind of

the workman to have been among the living herbage, not among Greek

precedents. The hard outlines in which, for the sake of perfect

intelligibility, I have left this Plate, have deprived the examples of

the vitality of their light and shade; but the reader can nevertheless

observe the _ideas_ of life occurring perpetually: at the top of fig.

4, for instance, the small leaves turned sideways; in fig. 5, the formal

volutes of the old Corinthian transformed into a branching tendril; in

fig. 6, the bunch of grapes thrown carelessly in at the right-hand

corner, in defiance of all symmetry; in fig. 7, the volutes knitted into

wreaths of ivy; in fig. 14, the leaves, drifted, as it were, by a

whirlwind round the capital by which they rise; while figs. 13 and 15

are as completely living leaves as any of the Gothic time. These designs

may or may not be graceful; what grace or beauty they have is not to be

rendered in mere outline,--but they are indisputably more _natural_ than

any Greek ones, and therefore healthier, and tending to greatness.

§ XXI. In the second place, note in all these examples, the excessive

breadth of the masses, however afterwards they may be filled with

detail. Whether we examine the contour of the simpler convex bells, or

those of the leaves which bend outwards from the richer and more

Corinthian types, we find they are all outlined by grand and simple

curves, and that the whole of their minute fretwork and thistle-work is

cast into a gigantic mould which subdues all their multitudinous points

and foldings to its own inevitable dominion. And the fact is, that in

the sweeping lines and broad surfaces of these Byzantine sculptures we

obtain, so far as I know, for the first time in the history of art, the

germ of that unity of perfect ease in every separate part, with perfect

subjection to an enclosing form or directing impulse, which was brought

to its most intense expression in the compositions of the two men in

whom the art of Italy consummated itself and expired--Tintoret and

Michael Angelo.

I would not attach too much importance to the mere habit of working on

the rounded surface of the stone, which is often as much the result of

haste or rudeness as of the desire for breadth, though the result

obtained is not the less beautiful. But in the capital from the Fondaco

de' Turchi, fig. 6, it will be seen that while the sculptor had taken

the utmost care to make his leaves free, graceful, and sharp in effect,

he was dissatisfied with their separation, and could not rest until he

had enclosed them with an unbroken line, like that of a pointed arch;

and the same thing is done in many different ways in other capitals of

the same building, and in many of St. Mark's: but one such instance

would have been enough to prove, if the loveliness of the profiles

themselves did not do so, that the sculptor understood and loved the

laws of generalization; and that the feeling which bound his prickly

leaves, as they waved or drifted round the ridges of his capital, into

those broad masses of unbroken flow, was indeed one with that which made

Michael Angelo encompass the principal figure in his Creation of Adam

with the broad curve of its cloudy drapery. It may seem strange to

assert any connexion between so great a conception and these rudely hewn

fragments of ruined marble; but all the highest principles of art are as

universal as they are majestic, and there is nothing too small to

receive their influence. They rule at once the waves of the mountain

outline, and the sinuosities of the minutest lichen that stains its

shattered stones.

§ XXII. We have not yet spoken of the three braided and chequered

capitals, numbered 10, 11, and 12. They are representations of a group,

with which many most interesting associations are connected. It was

noticed in the last chapter, that the method of covering the exterior of

buildings with thin pieces of marble was likely to lead to a system of

lighting the interior by minute perforation. In order to obtain both

light and air, without admitting any unbroken body of sunshine, in warm

countries, it became a constant habit of the Arabian architects to

pierce minute and starlike openings in slabs of stone; and to employ the

stones so pierced where the Gothic architects employ traceries.

Internally, the form of stars assumed by the light as it entered[49]

was, in itself, an exquisite decoration; but, externally, it was felt

necessary to add some slight ornament upon the surface of the perforated

stone; and it was soon found that, as the small perforations had a

tendency to look scattered and spotty, the most effective treatment of

the intermediate surfaces would be one which bound them together, and

gave unity and repose to the pierced and disturbed stone: universally,

therefore, those intermediate spaces were carved into the semblance of

interwoven fillets, which alternately sank beneath and rose above each

other as they met. This system of braided or woven ornament was not

confined to the Arabs; it is universally pleasing to the instinct of

mankind. I believe that nearly all early ornamentation is full of

it,--more especially, perhaps, Scandinavian and Anglo-Saxon; and

illuminated manuscripts depend upon it for their loveliest effects of

intricate color, up to the close of the thirteenth century. There are

several very interesting metaphysical reasons for this strange and

unfailing delight, felt in a thing so simple. It is not often that any

idea of utility has power to enhance the true impressions of beauty; but

it is possible that the enormous importance of the art of weaving to

mankind may give some interest, if not actual attractiveness, to any

type or image of the invention to which we owe, at once, our comfort and

our pride. But the more profound reason lies in the innate love of

mystery and unity; in the joy that the human mind has in contemplating

any kind of maze or entanglement, so long as it can discern, through its

confusion, any guiding clue or connecting plan: a pleasure increased and

solemnized by some dim feeling of the setting forth, by such symbols, of

the intricacy, and alternate rise and fall, subjection and supremacy, of

human fortune; the

"Weave the warp, and weave the woof,"

of Fate and Time.

[Illustration: Plate IX.

LILY CAPITAL OF ST. MARKS.]

§ XXIII. But be this as it may, the fact is that we are never tired of

contemplating this woven involution; and that, in some degree, the

sublime pleasure which we have in watching the branches of trees, the

intertwining of the grass, and the tracery of the higher clouds, is

owing to it, not less than that which we receive from the fine meshes of

the robe, the braiding of the hair, and the various glittering of the

linked net or wreathed chain. Byzantine ornamentation, like that of

almost all nations in a state of progress, is full of this kind of work:

but it occurs most conspicuously, though most simply, in the minute

traceries which surround their most solid capitals; sometimes merely in

a reticulated veil, as in the tenth figure in the Plate, sometimes

resembling a basket, on the edges of which are perched birds and other

animals. The diamonded ornament in the eleventh figure is substituted

for it in the Casa Loredan, and marks a somewhat later time and a

tendency to the ordinary Gothic chequer; but the capitals which show it

most definitely are those already so often spoken of as the lily

capitals of St. Mark's, of which the northern one is carefully drawn in

Plate IX.

[Illustration: Plate X.

THE FOUR VENETIAN FLOWER ORDERS.]

§ XXIV. These capitals, called barbarous by our architects, are without

exception the most subtle pieces of composition in broad contour which I

have ever met with in architecture. Their profile is given in the

opposite Plate X. fig. 3, _b_; the inner line in the figure being that

of the stone behind the lily, the outer that of the external network,

taken through the side of the capital; while fig. 3, _c_ is the outer

profile at its angle; and the reader will easily understand that the

passing of the one of these lines into the other is productive of the

most exquisite and wonderful series of curvatures possible within such

compass, no two views of the capital giving the same contour. Upon these

profoundly studied outlines, as remarkable for their grace and

complexity as the general mass of the capital is for solid strength and

proportion to its necessary service, the braided work is wrought with

more than usual care; perhaps, as suggested by the Marchese Selvatico,

with some idea of imitating those "nets of chequerwork and wreaths of

chainwork" on the chapiters of Solomon's temple, which are, I suppose,

the first instances on record of an ornamentation of this kind thus

applied. The braided work encloses on each of the four sides of the

capital a flower whose form, derived from that of the lily, though as

usual modified, in every instance of its occurrence, in some minor

particulars, is generally seen as represented in fig. 11 of Plate VIII.

It is never without the two square or oblong objects at the extremity of

the tendrils issuing from its root, set like vessels to catch the dew

from the points of its leaves; but I do not understand their meaning.

The abacus of the capital has already been given at _a_, Plate XVI.,

Vol. I.; but no amount of illustrations or eulogium would be enough to

make the reader understand the perfect beauty of the thing itself, as

the sun steals from interstice to interstice of its marble veil, and

touches with the white lustre of its rays at mid-day the pointed leaves

of its thirsty lilies.

In all the capitals hitherto spoken of, the form of the head of the bell

has been square, and its varieties of outline have been obtained in the

transition from the square of the abacus to the circular outline of the

shafts. A far more complex series of forms results from the division of

the bell by recesses into separate lobes or leaves, like those of a rose

or tulip, which are each in their turn covered with flower-work or

hollowed into reticulation. The example (fig. 10, Plate VII.) from St.

Mark's will give some idea of the simplest of these conditions: perhaps

the most exquisite in Venice, on the whole, is the central capital of

the upper arcade of the Fondaco de' Turchi.

Such are the principal generic conditions of the Byzantine capital; but

the reader must always remember that the examples given are single

instances, and those not the most beautiful but the most intelligible,

chosen out of thousands: the designs of the capitals of St. Mark's alone

would form a volume.

[Illustration: Plate XI.

BYZANTINE SCULPTURE.]

§ XXV. Of the archivolts which these capitals generally sustain, details

are given in the Appendix and in the notice of Venetian doors in Chapter

VII. In the private palaces, the ranges of archivolt are for the most

part very simple, with dentilled mouldings; and all the ornamental

effect is entrusted to pieces of sculpture set in the wall above or

between the arches, in the manner shown in Plate XV., below, Chapter

VII. These pieces of sculpture are either crosses, upright oblongs, or

circles: of all the three forms an example is given in Plate XI.

opposite. The cross was apparently an invariable ornament, placed either

in the centre of the archivolt of the doorway, or in the centre of the

first story above the windows; on each side of it the circular and

oblong ornaments were used in various alternation. In too many instances

the wall marbles have been torn away from the earliest Byzantine

palaces, so that the crosses are left on their archivolts only. The best

examples of the cross set above the windows are found in houses of the

transitional period: one in the Campo St^a M. Formosa; another, in which

a cross is placed between every window, is still well preserved in the

Campo St^a Maria Mater Domini; another, on the Grand Canal, in the

parish of the Apostoli, has two crosses, one on each side of the first

story, and a bas-relief of Christ enthroned in the centre; and finally,

that from which the larger cross in the Plate was taken in the house

once belonging to Marco Polo, at San Giovanni Grisostomo.

§ XXVI. This cross, though graceful and rich, and given because it

happens to be one of the best preserved, is uncharacteristic in one

respect; for, instead of the central rose at the meeting of the arms, we

usually find a hand raised in the attitude of blessing, between the sun

and moon, as in the two smaller crosses seen in the Plate. In nearly all

representations of the Crucifixion, over the whole of Europe, at the

period in question, the sun and the moon are introduced, one on each

side of the cross,--the sun generally, in paintings, as a red star; but

I do not think with any purpose of indicating the darkness at the time

of the agony; especially because, had this been the intention, the moon

ought not to have been visible, since it could not have been in the

heavens during the day at the time of passover. I believe rather that

the two luminaries are set there in order to express the entire

dependence of the heavens and the earth upon the work of the Redemption:

and this view is confirmed by our frequently finding the sun and moon

set in the same manner beside the figure of Christ, as in the centre of

the great archivolt of St. Mark's, or beside the hand signifying

benediction, without any cross, in some other early archivolts;[50]

while, again, not unfrequently they are absent from the symbol of the

cross itself, and its saving power over the whole of creation is

indicated only by fresh leaves springing from its foot, or doves feeding

beside it; and so also, in illuminated Bibles, we find the series of

pictures representing the Creation terminate in the Crucifixion, as the

work by which all the families of created beings subsist, no less than

that in sympathy with which "the whole creation groaneth and travaileth

in pain together until now."

§ XXVII. This habit of placing the symbol of the Christian faith in the

centres of their palaces was, as I above said, universal in early

Venice; it does not cease till about the middle of the fourteenth

century. The other sculptures, which were set above or between the

arches, consist almost invariably of groups of birds or beasts; either

standing opposite to each other with a small pillar or spray of leafage

between them, or else tearing and devouring each other. The multitude of

these sculptures, especially of the small ones enclosed in circles, as

figs 5 and 6, Plate XI., which are now scattered through the city of

Venice, is enormous, but they are seldom to be seen in their original

positions. When the Byzantine palaces were destroyed, these fragments

were generally preserved, and inserted again in the walls of the new

buildings, with more or less attempt at symmetry; fragments of friezes

and mouldings being often used in the same manner; so that the mode of

their original employment can only be seen in St. Mark's, the Fondaco

de' Turchi, Braided House, and one or two others. The most remarkable

point about them is, that the groups of beasts or birds on each side of

the small pillars bear the closest possible resemblance to the group of

Lions over the gate of Mycenæ; and the whole of the ornamentation of

that gate, as far as I can judge of it from drawings, is so like

Byzantine sculpture, that I cannot help sometimes suspecting the

original conjecture of the French antiquarians, that it was a work of

the middle ages, to be not altogether indefensible. By far the best

among the sculptures at Venice are those consisting of groups thus

arranged; the first figure in Plate XI. is one of those used on St.

Mark's, and, with its chain of wreathen work round it, is very

characteristic of the finest kind, except that the immediate trunk or

pillar often branches into luxuriant leafage, usually of the vine, so

that the whole ornament seems almost composed from the words of Ezekiel.

"A great eagle with great wings, long-winged, full of feathers, which

had divers colors, came into Lebanon, and took the highest branch of the

cedar: He cropped off the top of his young twigs; and _carried it into a

city of traffic; he set it in a city of merchants_. He took also of the

seed of the land, ... and it grew, and became a spreading vine of low

stature, _whose branches turned towards him, and the roots thereof were

under him_."

§ XXVIII. The groups of contending and devouring animals are always much

ruder in cutting, and take somewhat the place in Byzantine sculpture

which the lower grotesques do in the Gothic; true, though clumsy,

grotesques being sometimes mingled among them, as four bodies joined to

one head in the centre;[51] but never showing any attempt at variety of

invention, except only in the effective disposition of the light and

shade, and in the vigor and thoughtfulness of the touches which indicate

the plumes of the birds or foldings of the leaves. Care, however, is

always taken to secure variety enough to keep the eye entertained, no

two sides of these Byzantine ornaments being in all respects the same:

for instance, in the chainwork round the first figure in Plate XI. there

are two circles enclosing squares on the left-hand side of the arch at

the top, but two smaller circles and a diamond on the other, enclosing

one square, and two small circular spots or bosses; and in the line of

chain at the bottom there is a circle on the right, and a diamond on the

left, and so down to the working of the smallest details. I have

represented this upper sculpture as dark, in order to give some idea of

the general effect of these ornaments when seen in shadow against light;

an effect much calculated upon by the designer, and obtained by the use

of a golden ground formed of glass mosaic inserted in the hollows of the

marble. Each square of glass has the leaf gold upon its surface

protected by another thin film of glass above it, so that no time or

weather can affect its lustre, until the pieces of glass are bodily torn

from their setting. The smooth glazed surface of the golden ground is

washed by every shower of rain, but the marble usually darkens into an

amber color in process of time; and when the whole ornament is cast into

shadow, the golden surface, being perfectly reflective, refuses the

darkness, and shows itself in bright and burnished light behind the dark

traceries of the ornament. Where the marble has retained its perfect

whiteness, on the other hand, and is seen in sunshine, it is shown as a

snowy tracery on a golden ground; and the alternations and intermingling

of these two effects form one of the chief enchantments of Byzantine

ornamentation.

§ XXIX. How far the system of grounding with gold and color, universal

in St. Mark's, was carried out in the sculptures of the private palaces,

it is now impossible to say. The wrecks of them which remain, as above

noticed, show few of their ornamental sculptures in their original

position; and from those marbles which were employed in succeeding

buildings, during the Gothic period, the fragments of their mosaic

grounds would naturally rather have been removed than restored. Mosaic,

while the most secure of all decorations if carefully watched and

refastened when it loosens, may, if neglected and exposed to weather, in

process of time disappear so as to leave no vestige of its existence.

However this may have been, the assured facts are, that both the shafts

of the pillars and the facing of the old building were of veined or

variously colored marble: the capitals and sculptures were either, as

they now appear, of pure white marble, relieved upon the veined ground;

or, which is infinitely the more probable, grounded in the richer

palaces with mosaic of gold, in the inferior ones with blue color; and

only the leaves and edges of the sculpture gilded. These brighter hues

were opposed by bands of deeper color, generally alternate russet and

green, in the archivolts,--bands which still remain in the Casa Loredan

and Fondaco de' Turchi, and in a house in the Corte del Remer, near the

Rialto, as well as in St. Mark's; and by circular disks of green

serpentine and porphyry, which, together with the circular sculptures,

appear to have been an ornament peculiarly grateful to the Eastern mind,

derived probably in the first instance from the suspension of shields

upon the wall, as in the majesty of ancient Tyre. "The men of Arvad with

thine army were upon thy walls round about, and the Gammadins were in

thy towers: they hanged their shields upon thy walls round about; they

have made thy beauty perfect."[52] The sweet and solemn harmony of

purple with various green (the same, by the by, to which the hills of

Scotland owe their best loveliness) remained a favorite chord of color

with the Venetians, and was constantly used even in the later palaces;

but never could have been seen in so great perfection as when opposed to

the pale and delicate sculpture of the Byzantine time.

§ XXX. Such, then, was that first and fairest Venice which rose out of

the barrenness of the lagoon, and the sorrow of her people; a city of

graceful arcades and gleaming walls, veined with azure and warm with

gold, and fretted with white sculpture like frost upon forest branches

turned to marble. And yet, in this beauty of her youth, she was no city

of thoughtless pleasure. There was still a sadness of heart upon her,

and a depth of devotion, in which lay all her strength. I do not insist

upon the probable religious signification of many of the sculptures

which are now difficult of interpretation; but the temper which made the

cross the principal ornament of every building is not to be

misunderstood, nor can we fail to perceive, in many of the minor

sculptural subjects, meanings perfectly familiar to the mind of early

Christianity. The peacock, used in preference to every other bird, is

the well-known symbol of the resurrection; and when drinking from a

fountain (Plate XI. fig. 1) or from a font (Plate XI. fig. 5), is, I

doubt not, also a type of the new life received in faithful baptism. The

vine, used in preference to all other trees, was equally recognized as,

in all cases, a type either of Christ himself[53] or of those who were

in a state of visible or professed union with him. The dove, at its

foot, represents the coming of the Comforter; and even the groups of

contending animals had, probably, a distinct and universally apprehended

reference to the powers of evil. But I lay no stress on these more

occult meanings. The principal circumstance which marks the seriousness

of the early Venetian mind is perhaps the last in which the reader would

suppose it was traceable;--that love of bright and pure color which, in

a modified form, was afterwards the root of all the triumph of the

Venetian schools of painting, but which, in its utmost simplicity, was

characteristic of the Byzantine period only; and of which, therefore, in

the close of our review of that period, it will be well that we should

truly estimate the significance. The fact is, we none of us enough

appreciate the nobleness and sacredness of color. Nothing is more common

than to hear it spoken of as a subordinate beauty,--nay, even as the

mere source of a sensual pleasure; and we might almost believe that we

were daily among men who

"Could strip, for aught the prospect yields

To them, their verdure from the fields;

And take the radiance from the clouds

With which the sun his setting shrouds."

But it is not so. Such expressions are used for the most part in

thoughtlessness; and if the speakers would only take the pains to

imagine what the world and their own existence would become, if the blue

were taken from the sky, and the gold from the sunshine, and the verdure

from the leaves, and the crimson from the blood which is the life of

man, the flush from the cheek, the darkness from the eye, the radiance

from the hair,--if they could but see for an instant, white human

creatures living in a white world,--they would soon feel what they owe

to color. The fact is, that, of all God's gifts to the sight of man,

color is the holiest, the most divine, the most solemn. We speak rashly

of gay color, and sad color, for color cannot at once be good and gay.

All good color is in some degree pensive, the loveliest is melancholy,

and the purest and most thoughtful minds are those which love color the

most.

§ XXXI. I know that this will sound strange in many ears, and will be

especially startling to those who have considered the subject chiefly

with reference to painting; for the great Venetian schools of color are

not usually understood to be either pure or pensive, and the idea of its

pre-eminence is associated in nearly every mind with the coarseness of

Rubens, and the sensualities of Correggio and Titian. But a more

comprehensive view of art will soon correct this impression. It will be

discovered, in the first place, that the more faithful and earnest the

religion of the painter, the more pure and prevalent is the system of

his color. It will be found, in the second place, that where color

becomes a primal intention with a painter otherwise mean or sensual, it

instantly elevates him, and becomes the one sacred and saving element in

his work. The very depth of the stoop to which the Venetian painters and

Rubens sometimes condescend, is a consequence of their feeling

confidence in the power of their color to keep them from falling. They

hold on by it, as by a chain let down from heaven, with one hand, though

they may sometimes seem to gather dust and ashes with the other. And, in

the last place, it will be found that so surely as a painter is

irreligious, thoughtless, or obscene in disposition, so surely is his

coloring cold, gloomy, and valueless. The opposite poles of art in this

respect are Frà Angelico and Salvator Rosa; of whom the one was a man

who smiled seldom, wept often, prayed constantly, and never harbored an

impure thought. His pictures are simply so many pieces of jewellery, the

colors of the draperies being perfectly pure, as various as those of a

painted window, chastened only by paleness, and relieved upon a gold

ground. Salvator was a dissipated jester and satirist, a man who spent

his life in masquing and revelry. But his pictures are full of horror,

and their color is for the most part gloomy grey. Truly it would seem as

if art had so much of eternity in it, that it must take its dye from the

close rather than the course of life:--"In such laughter the heart of

man is sorrowful, and the end of that mirth is heaviness."

§ XXXII. These are no singular instances. I know no law more severely

without exception than this of the connexion of pure color with profound

and noble thought. The late Flemish pictures, shallow in conception and

obscene in subject, are always sober in color. But the early religious

painting of the Flemings is as brilliant in hue as it is holy in

thought. The Bellinis, Francias, Peruginos painted in crimson, and blue,

and gold. The Caraccis, Guidos, and Rembrandts in brown and grey. The

builders of our great cathedrals veiled their casements and wrapped

their pillars with one robe of purple splendor. The builders of the

luxurious Renaissance left their palaces filled only with cold white

light, and in the paleness of their native stone.[54]

§ XXXIII. Nor does it seem difficult to discern a noble reason for this

universal law. In that heavenly circle which binds the statutes of color

upon the front of the sky, when it became the sign of the covenant of

peace, the pure hues of divided light were sanctified to the human heart

for ever; nor this, it would seem, by mere arbitrary appointment, but in

consequence of the fore-ordained and marvellous constitution of those

hues into a sevenfold, or, more strictly still, a threefold order,

typical of the Divine nature itself. Observe also, the name Shem, or

Splendor, given to that son of Noah in whom this covenant with mankind

was to be fulfilled, and see how that name was justified by every one of

the Asiatic races which descended from him. Not without meaning was the

love of Israel to his chosen son expressed by the coat "of many colors;"

not without deep sense of the sacredness of that symbol of purity, did

the lost daughter of David tear it from her breast:--"With such robes

were the king's daughters that were virgins apparelled."[55] We know it

to have been by Divine command that the Israelite, rescued from

servitude, veiled the tabernacle with its rain of purple and scarlet,

while the under sunshine flashed through the fall of the color from its

tenons of gold: but was it less by Divine guidance that the Mede, as he

struggled out of anarchy, encompassed his king with the sevenfold

burning of the battlements of Ecbatana?--of which one circle was golden

like the sun, and another silver like the moon; and then came the great

sacred chord of color, blue, purple, and scarlet; and then a circle

white like the day, and another dark, like night; so that the city rose

like a great mural rainbow, a sign of peace amidst the contending of

lawless races, and guarded, with color and shadow, that seemed to

symbolize the great order which rules over Day, and Night, and Time, the

first organization of the mighty statutes,--the law of the Medes and

Persians, that altereth not.

§ XXXIV. Let us not dream that it is owing to the accidents of tradition

or education that those races possess the supremacy over color which has

always been felt, though but lately acknowledged among men. However

their dominion might be broken, their virtue extinguished, or their

religion defiled, they retained alike the instinct and the power: the

instinct which made even their idolatry more glorious than that of

others, bursting forth in fire-worship from pyramid, cave, and mountain,

taking the stars for the rulers of its fortune, and the sun for the God

of its life; the power which so dazzled and subdued the rough crusader

into forgetfulness of sorrow and of shame, that Europe put on the

splendor which she had learnt of the Saracen, as her sackcloth of

mourning for what she suffered from his sword;--the power which she

confesses to this day, in the utmost thoughtlessness of her pride, or

her beauty, as it treads the costly carpet, or veils itself with the

variegated Cachemire; and in the emulation of the concourse of her

workmen, who, but a few months back, perceived, or at least admitted,

for the first time, the pre-eminence which has been determined from the

birth of mankind, and on whose charter Nature herself has set a

mysterious seal, granting to the Western races, descended from that son

of Noah whose name was Extension, the treasures of the sullen rock, and

stubborn ore, and gnarled forest, which were to accomplish their destiny

across all distance of earth and depth of sea, while she matured the

jewel in the sand, and rounded the pearl in the shell, to adorn the

diadem of him whose name was Splendor.

§ XXXV. And observe, farther, how in the Oriental mind a peculiar

seriousness is associated with this attribute of the love of color; a

seriousness rising out of repose, and out of the depth and breadth of

the imagination, as contrasted with the activity, and consequent

capability of surprise, and of laughter, characteristic of the Western

mind: as a man on a journey must look to his steps always, and view

things narrowly and quickly; while one at rest may command a wider view,

though an unchanging one, from which the pleasure he receives must be

one of contemplation, rather than of amusement or surprise. Wherever the

pure Oriental spirit manifests itself definitely, I believe its work is

serious; and the meeting of the influences of the Eastern and Western

races is perhaps marked in Europe more by the dying away of the

grotesque laughter of the Goth than by any other sign. I shall have more

to say on this head in other places of this volume; but the point I wish

at present to impress upon the reader is, that the bright hues of the

early architecture of Venice were no sign of gaiety of heart, and that

the investiture with the mantle of many colors by which she is known

above all other cities of Italy and of Europe, was not granted to her in

the fever of her festivity, but in the solemnity of her early and

earnest religion. She became in after times the revel of the earth, the

masque of Italy; and _therefore_ is she now desolate: but her glorious

robe of gold and purple was given her when first she rose a vestal from

the sea, not when she became drunk with the wine of her fornication.

§ XXXVI. And we have never yet looked with enough reverence upon the

separate gift which was thus bestowed upon her; we have never enough

considered what an inheritance she has left us, in the works of those

mighty painters who were the chief of her children. That inheritance is

indeed less than it ought to have been, and other than it ought to have

been; for before Titian and Tintoret arose,--the men in whom her work

and her glory should have been together consummated,--she had already

ceased to lead her sons in the way of truth and life, and they erred

much, and fell short of that which was appointed for them. There is no

subject of thought more melancholy, more wonderful, than the way in

which God permits so often His best gifts to be trodden under foot of

men, His richest treasures to be wasted by the moth, and the mightiest

influences of His Spirit, given but once in the world's history, to be

quenched and shortened by miseries of chance and guilt. I do not wonder

at what men Suffer, but I wonder often at what they Lose. We may see how

good rises out of pain and evil; but the dead, naked, eyeless loss, what

good comes of that? The fruit struck to the earth before its ripeness;

the glowing life and goodly purpose dissolved away in sudden death; the

words, half spoken, choked upon the lips with clay for ever; or,

stranger than all, the whole majesty of humanity raised to its fulness,

and every gift and power necessary for a given purpose, at a given

moment, centred in one man, and all this perfected blessing permitted to

be refused, perverted, crushed, cast aside by those who need it

most,--the city which is Not set on a hill, the candle that giveth light

to None that are in the house:--these are the heaviest mysteries of this

strange world, and, it seems to me, those which mark its curse the most.

And it is true that the power with which this Venice had been entrusted,

was perverted, when at its highest, in a thousand miserable ways; still,

it was possessed by her alone; to her all hearts have turned which could

be moved by its manifestation, and none without being made stronger and

nobler by what her hand had wrought. That mighty Landscape, of dark

mountains that guard the horizon with their purple towers, and solemn

forests, that gather their weight of leaves, bronzed with sunshine, not

with age, into those gloomy masses fixed in heaven, which storm and

frost have power no more to shake, or shed;--that mighty Humanity, so

perfect and so proud, that hides no weakness beneath the mantle, and

gains no greatness from the diadem; the majesty of thoughtful form, on

which the dust of gold and flame of jewels are dashed as the sea-spray

upon the rock, and still the great Manhood seems to stand bare against

the blue sky;--that mighty Mythology, which fills the daily walks of men

with spiritual companionship, and beholds the protecting angels break

with their burning presence through the arrow-flights of

battle:--measure the compass of that field of creation, weigh the value

of the inheritance that Venice thus left to the nations of Europe, and

then judge if so vast, so beneficent a power could indeed have been

rooted in dissipation or decay. It was when she wore the ephod of the

priest, not the motley of the masquer, that the fire fell upon her from

heaven; and she saw the first rays of it through the rain of her own

tears, when, as the barbaric deluge ebbed from the hills of Italy, the

circuit of her palaces, and the orb of her fortunes, rose together, like

the Iris, painted upon the Cloud.

FOOTNOTES

[41] In the year 1851, by the Duchesse de Berri.

[42] Of the Braided House and Casa Businello, described in the

Appendix, only the great central arcades remain.

[43] Only one wing of the first story is left. See Appendix 11.

[44] I am obliged to give these measures approximately, because,

this front having been studied by the builder with unusual care, not

one of its measures is the same as another; and the symmetries

between the correspondent arches are obtained by changes in the

depth of their mouldings and variations in their heights, far too

complicated for me to enter into here; so that of the two arches

stated as 19 ft. 8 in. in span, one is in reality 19 ft. 6½ in., the

other 19 ft. 10 in., and of the two stated as 20 ft. 4 in., one is

20 ft. and the other 20 ft. 8 in.

[45] By Mr. Penrose.

[46] I am sometimes obliged, unfortunately, to read my woodcuts

backwards owing to my having forgotten to reverse them on the wood.

[47] Vide Plate X. figs. 1 and 4.

[48]

1. Fondaco de' Turehi, lateral 8. St. Mark's.

pillars. 9. St. Mark's.

2. Terraced House, lateral pillars. 10. Braided House, upper arcade.

3. Casa Farsetti, central pillars, 11. Casa Loredan, upper arcade.

upper arcade. 12. St. Mark's.

4. Casa Loredan, lower arcade. 13. St. Mark's.

5. Casa Loredan, lower arcade. 14. Fondaco de' Turchi, upper

6. Fondaco de' Turchi, upper arcade. arcade.

7. Casa Loredan, upper arcade. 15. St. Mark's.

[49] Compare "Seven Lamps," chap. ii. § 22.

[50] Two of these are represented in the second number of my folio work

upon Venice.

[51] The absence of the true grotesque spirit in Byzantine work will be

examined in the third chapter of the third volume.

[52] Ezekiel, xxvii. 11.

[53] Perhaps this type is in no place of Scripture more touchingly used

than in Lamentations, i. 12, where the word "afflicted" is rendered in

the Vulgate "vindemiavit," "vintaged."

[54] Appendix 12, "Modern Painting on Glass."

[55] 2 Samuel, xiii. 18.

SECOND, OR GOTHIC, PERIOD.

The Stones of Venice, Volume 2 (of 3), · 第 6 / 12 章