RELATION OF FOOD TO MORALS.

A SERMON PREACHED BY

REV. J. F. CLYMER,

IN THE FIRST METHODIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH, AUBURN, NEW YORK,

ON SUNDAY, JUNE 20TH, 1880.

“If a man have a stubborn and rebellious son, which will not obey the

voice of his father or the voice of his mother, and that when they

have chastened him, will not hearken unto them, then shall his father

and his mother lay hold on him, and bring him out unto the elders of

his city, and unto the gates of his place; and they shall say unto the

elders of his city: _This our son is stubborn and rebellious; he will

not obey our voice; he is a glutton and a drunkard._”—DEUT. xxi. 18-20.

We have had much teaching that has left the impression on our minds

that the soul is the _only_ source and seat of all the vice in human

life. Because it is written “The imaginations of the thoughts of the

natural heart, are only evil continually,” total depravity has been

fixed on the spirit nature of man; that is, all the bad or immoral

elements entering into human life have been attributed to the innate

or inborn ugliness of the soul. Accepting the Scriptural truth that

“the soul that sinneth, it shall die,” we have come to think that sin

has its _center_, _seat_, _source and circumference_ in the soul, or

the immaterial nature of man. Hence we readily admit the fact that

influences, good or bad, may pass over from the soul to the body, but

we do not so readily admit that _other_ fact, equally true, that

influence good or bad may go over from the _body_ to the soul. The road

over which vicious thoughts and lustful imaginations pass from the soul

to the body is the highway over which unbridled appetites, unrestrained

passions and unsubdued lusts in the body may go to the soul, goading

it to the wildest conceptions of vice and lecherous imaginations. The

warm rays of the sun may gender rottenness in the muddy pool; so also

will the effluvia from the pool poison the sunlight near it. The soul

by its vicious thoughts and imaginations will entail an immoral tone on

the body; so also will the body react on the soul, by its appetites,

passions and propensities, increasing the viciousness of the soul by

pushing it to courses of vice not directly and immediately its own. In

our text is found an illustration of this thought. A father and mother

bring their stubborn and rebellious son to the elders of the Jewish

church. They assign, as the cause of his stubbornness and rebellion,

gluttony and drunkenness, than which there are no vices that demoralize

the body more, or goad the soul to greater crimes. Hear it:

“This our son is stubborn and rebellious, he will not obey our voice,

he is a glutton and a drunkard.” That is, bad conditions of the physical

nature, wrought by gluttony and drunkenness, have made him stubborn and

rebellious. It will not help the case to say that his stubbornness and

rebellion caused his gluttony and drunkenness, for if they did, then

his soul must act on the body. His morals must influence his manners,

and therefore his manners must reflect on his morals; they must

interact, which is just the point we make; that his appetite and lust

fire the temperament or disposition, and a fiery disposition provokes

appetite and lust to wilder indulgences.

A remarkable fact, in this day of advanced science and revelation, is

that Christians and moralists in their work of reform have paid so

little attention to the influence of the body on the soul. Jesus Christ

more than any other teacher or reformer recognized the demoralizing

and debasing influence of bad bodily conditions. Hence he almost

always healed maladies of the body before he entered his principles

upon the soul. It is true that his many miracles on the bodies of men

were primarily intended to reveal his divinity; yet divinity in its

manifestations always runs over the whole line of the natural before

passing into the supernatural; therefore Christ’s miracles on the

bodies of men had a sanitary side to them. The man with the leprosy was

in the poorest condition bodily to hear favorably any talk about moral

sweetness; hence Christ healed his diseased body, in connection with

his moral teachings. His example with the blind and hungry and deaf in

this respect ought not to go for nothing with those of us who seek to

save men in our day. Philanthropists and Christians for the most part

have overlooked the power of a debased body on the soul. They forget

that Paul likens a body that has sinful habitudes to a thing of death,

as compared with the soul that seeks to live the new life in Christ

Jesus. Therefore good men have labored to create in themselves and

those whom they seek to reform, certain emotional conditions of the

spirit, by a tenacious adherence to creeds, or the patient performance

of a set round of religious duties, and all this regardless of bad

physical conditions begotten by bad habits of eating and drinking.

While they have been struggling to bring their own souls and the souls

of others into holy attitudes, all the basilar forces of the body have

run riot within, and perhaps beyond, the pale of human customs and

human laws. If you want to empty a boiler of steam, it will not help

you much by lifting the safety valve if you still keep water in the

boiler and fire in the furnace. Prayer, Bible reading and Psalm singing

will not help a man much to get rid of his sins, if he keeps up a set

of bodily habits which fire the body and inflame the soul to continue

its sinning. That you may see the connection more clearly between

vice and victuals, let me show you how food may damage our bodies and

demoralize our souls.

I am fully aware of the difficulties I encounter in entering this

thought on your minds. Because religion has been considered as having

little or nothing to do with the body, I shall encounter the settled

opinions of good men to this effect. Because our popular methods of

eating have the sanction of custom and the defense of long established

habits, I may not criticise them without losing the favor of those who

are content with things as they are. Because I shall call in question

many indulgences of appetite hitherto considered sinless, I shall run

the risk of being called a fanatic or fool. Because I shall preach the

New Testament doctrine of self-denial many will say this is a hard

saying—“who can bear it?” But with the hope that I may unfold to you a

glorious realm of liberty from the bondage of bodily propensities, I

cheerfully do my duty and leave the consequences for God to look after.

Very few of us are aware of the great physical demoralization and

spiritual wickedness, brought on us and our children, by bad habits of

eating, as to the kind of food, the mode of its preparation, and the

manner and times of taking it. We refuse to think of our indulgences

of appetite as the cause of our physical ailments and premature death,

and much less will we allow ourselves to believe that these indulgences

have anything to do with forming our morals or shaping our characters

or determining our eternal destiny.

And yet I aver, without the fear of successful refutation, that

three-fourths of all our bodily ailments or diseases, and many of our

immoral acts, are the legitimate results of improper dietetic habits.

If these habits do not effect us directly, they do so indirectly by

lowering the tone of the whole system, physical and moral, causing us

to break down prematurely into some disease or deviltry, under the

pressure of legitimate toil or immoral provocation. How is it possible

to account for the death of one half the human family before five years

of age, unless we trace it to the violation of physical laws in some

way connected with the eating habits alike of parent and child? Many

children enter the world with such a low state of inherited physical

vitality, and so little moral tone, that they are unable to resist

the attacks of bodily disease or throw it off when on them, and much

less able to throw off moral disease and rise above their immoral

heritage if spared to pass through childhood to years of maturity. Such

children not only carry in their little bodies the physical weaknesses

of their parents, but also the specific immoral tendencies found in

the conditions of their parentage. And more than this, should their

endowment of vitality be sufficient to carry them over the death line

for infants, they are subject to such unnatural relations to dress and

diet that it becomes a natural impossibility for them to live. In this

way many children die prematurely, not by the arbitrary edict of God,

but by the violation of law. And if God should save their lives by

special suspension of his laws, more damage would be done to the moral

harmony of the universe than to let them die. I know it is a common

custom to ascribe all sickness and death to the direct and arbitrary

action of Divine Providence. That is, if one overeats, or eats

innutritious food, or at improper times, making himself sickly, so that

he becomes an easy prey to disease, and dies suddenly or at the noon

tide of life, all the good people say—“What a strange Providence!” As

if God had everything to do with such a death, and the deceased had

little or nothing to do with it. I incline to the opinion that Divine

Providence has little or nothing to do with such deaths only in so

far as Divine Providence is in the laws of life violated. The primary

cause of all premature deaths is violated law. God does not arbitrarily

kill anybody. Most of those who die in infancy or in early life, come

to death by the violation of God’s laws written in their bodies. If

these laws were obeyed in us and in our ancestry, most of us ought to

live beyond three score years and ten, and drop from this life into

the other in a ripe, mellow old age, just as ripe fruit drops from its

bough in autumn time. But you ask where is God in the many untimely

deaths that occur? I answer He is present in his great hearted goodness

to help the dying to an eternal victory over death, if they will only

let Him. He is present to bind up the hearts that are breaking with

sorrow for the departed, and to make a sudden, untimely, and needless

death a monument of warning to those still living, thus making the

wrath of man to praise Him. If therefore our children die in infancy,

because we have entailed on them feeble bodies by our violation of law,

God does not kill them, but they die through violated law, and he in

His goodness takes the little ones to His bosom, the seat and source of

all law. Let us not then charge our sorrows to the willful enactment

of our Heavenly Father. He taketh no pleasure in the death of him that

dieth. When he gives life to us, He intends that we shall keep it as

long as possible.

Having given us life, all the forces of His boundless nature are

engaged to maintain it in us until He is ready to harvest us as the

farmer does the ripened grain. The God of nature and the God of grace

are not in antagonism. “The one God is in all and over all.” A kingdom

divided against itself cannot stand. If, therefore, we die this side

of three score years and ten—seventy years—we die untimely. It is high

time that good men were awake to this fact, and ceased charging over

to Divine Providence what legitimately belongs to ourselves. “Jesus

Christ came to destroy him that hath the power of death, that is the

devil;” and when the philosophy of Jesus is wrought up into human lives

by obedience to physical laws, the power of disease and death over

our bodies will be very much broken. The victory over death can be so

far achieved by men in the body that they need not die until their

minds and hearts have received all the development in this world that

infinite love ordains. That is, men may so baffle the monster of death

by obedience to law as to keep him at bay until their souls have taken

on such Christly ripeness that they shall burst and break their bodies,

as the ripening chestnuts break their burrs under the frosts of autumn.

We have, therefore, no right to ascribe to supernatural agency any

phenomena which can be explained on natural principles. Disobedience

to law brings penalties. There is nothing that men need to see more in

their efforts at reform than the connection between their sufferings

and their disobedience. Now, disobedience to the laws of life brings

the penalties, sickness and premature death. There is no field where

our disobedience manifests itself more frequently and with so little

thought of consequences, as in our false and unnatural habits of eating

and drinking, which damage the body and demoralize the soul.

“The Blood is the Life.” This is the declaration alike of revelation and

of science. Evolutionary processes may induce a variation in the form

or number of the blood corpuscles, but they can not set aside the law

that the building and rebuilding of all the organs involved in bodily

or mental acts comes from the blood alone. The physical, mental and

moral natures are so intimately connected that that which affects one,

affects the others. So that a man’s mental and moral nature, as well

as his physical, can very largely be determined by the quality of his

blood. Now it is a physiological fact that our blood is made out of

the food we eat. That food which enters the mouth and is assimilated,

makes blood. By the marvelous processes of digestion and assimilation

our food is transformed into blood; and the blood passing through the

veins and arteries repairs the waste tissues and forms new ones, thus

building up our bodies and sustaining life. It follows then that our

bodies are made of the food we eat. Evidently it was the design of

our Creator that the prime object of eating should be the building up

of tissue—muscles, bones and brains. That this may be a pleasure to

us, He has associated with eating the delights of appetite. But most

of us have so far perverted the divine order as to make the pleasures

of appetite the chief object of eating. “Give us something _good_ to

eat,” is the great cry of humanity, and the goodness of food is gauged

by the sensations of the palate and not by the law of nutrition. Most

of us determine the goodness of our food by the amount of sensual

delight it imparts to the palate, no matter how much damage it may

do beyond to the delicate and intricate structure of the stomach and

viscera. Hence a vast amount of food enters the mouth that makes bad

blood, blood that in itself is corrupt, and carries poisonous particles

to every organ in the system, putting us in splendid condition to be

easily provoked to some outburst of anger, passion or revenge. My

hearers, there is a sure and vital connection between bad blood and

bad morals. Blood always tells in morals as well as in muscles. Blood

has power throughout the whole realm of life, whether it be in a human

body, in society, or in the body of a horse on the racecourse.

You ask, what kind of food makes bad blood? I answer, very much of the

flesh of animals, that forms the staple diet of most of us. Sty-fed

pigs and stall-fed oxen are fattened under the most unlawful and

unhealthful conditions possible; shut up in the dark, cut off from

exercise, the fat deposited on their bodies is made up of the waste

matter that the life-forces of the animal have been unable to expel.

This waste fatty matter, surcharged with unexpelled excretions, is

liable to induce disease in all who consume it. It has established

tuberculosis in captive lions, and in cats and dogs, and in other

carnivora; and it were folly to assume that mankind, feeding upon

such poisonous food, should wholly escape. Even in the living animal

this effete unexpelled poisonous waste breeds vermin, such as have

been found in pork, which cannot be destroyed by ordinary cooking or

by the process of digestion, and hence live and generate in the human

body, producing disease and death. I am not now making a plea for the

absolute disuse of animal food, but against the bad quality of very

much of it, and also against the inordinate use of that which may be

good in quality. A certain amount of animal food is useful for our

nourishment, especially in winter time, because of its heat producing

qualities. But meat every day, and at every meal, is in no way

necessary for the proper sustenance of the human system.

The use of large quantities of animal food, however free from

disease-germs, as a _staple_ article of diet makes the blood gross,

coarse and corrupt, filling the body with scrofulous elements, sending

poison to every part of the system, causing it to break out in running

sores, salt-rheum, tetter and the like, producing an inordinate

appetite, throwing every organ of the body into frictional relations

to every other organ. It is a matter of every-day surprise to me

that any human being will consent to eat the flesh of pigs. Consider

their uncleanness, their selfish, greedy habits, the vast amount of

corruption that enters into their bodies, their want of exercise,

their impure breathing, their lack of sudorific glands or emunctories,

through which effete tissues and morbid accumulations may be expelled;

and think, when you eat pork, of the train of horrid elements which

enter into your body. And your body thus debased by a low order of

animal flesh, the effect must be to make you take on the disposition

and tendencies of the hog. God’s bill of fare in the eleventh chapter

of Leviticus excluded from the tables of the Jews the hog and all water

animals except those that had fins and scales. This bill of fare was

given to the Jews not only for the preservation of their health, but,

as God’s great purpose was moral reform, He had an eye single to their

moral condition in the matter of their eating. Does any one doubt that

the unhealthy, ugly, and vicious elements that make up the flesh of

most of the animals we eat, enter our blood, and in that way affect the

disposition or carriage of the soul? I am confident, if there was less

demand for animal food the quality would be very much better. Animals

would not be subject to false and unhealthy generation, and false and

hasty methods of growth. They would come up more in keeping with the

laws of their nature, and come to us with more healthy and better

qualities. As for the hog, if man would not domesticate him, he could

not propagate his species. He would become extinct just like the lion,

leopard, and hyena, under the march of civilization. As the blessings

of civilized life reach us, you notice the carnivorous or flesh-eating

animals become extinct. So it seems to me that with the developments of

civilization there ought to be such moral refinements in human beings

that they would grow away from their carnivorous tendencies, and eat

such food as tends to develop the mental and moral faculties, and not

the animal propensities. Among animals you find that those that live on

the flesh of other animals are the most vicious and destructive, such

as the lion, leopard, and hyena. Those animals that live on the grains

and the higher order of foods are the best, most beautiful, and most

useful, such as the horse and cow. If this law obtains among animals,

why not among men? Beyond a doubt it does. If you want proof of this,

study the character and lives of those who live largely on animal food,

and you will find them very animal-like in all their relations—restive,

impatient, passionate, ugly in their ways, fiery in their disposition,

easily provoked, readily put out of humor. And if you could look into

their private lives you would find all their baser qualities having the

fullest sway, stopping, it may be, inside the fence of human laws and

customs, but seldom considering the claims of a higher and divine law.

I charge, then, very much of our household misery, domestic woe, and

connubial wretchedness, to unrestrained lust begotten in the body by

the inordinate use of animal food.

We forget, my hearers, that the great law of nature, “Like produces

like,” is universal. “Every seed after its kind is the law of all

creation.” There is no exception to this law. This principle obtains

not only in the production of life, but in the processes of its

development. If my position about the intimacy of soul and body is

true, then, if a man’s body is made up chiefly of flesh taken from

diseased animals, and his whole physical frame is saturated with the

irritating and exciting condiments of what is popularly called good

food, the whole bias of his bodily powers will be toward animalism.

All the impressions and impulses that the soul receives from such a

body are beastly and debasing. Like produces like in the formation of

physical tissue out of food, as well as in the generation of stock in

the stall. Hence I hold that very much of the wickedness of mankind

is the natural expression of physical beastliness rather than the

outflow of innate viciousness. A body made up largely of all manner of

nerve-goading, passion-producing, anger-generating elements, such as

are found in the gross animal dishes with their stimulating adjuncts,

just as surely drives the soul to sin as a tempest drives a feather

before it.

As modern research has proved that bad or imperfect food when

digested surely makes bad or imperfect blood, incapable of performing

its appointed work of upbuilding and of reparation, so has science

demonstrated that perfect food is one of the most potent among

remedies for the relief of many diseased conditions. Since the blood

is the life, and since blood is merely food emulsified, mingled with

certain digestive fluids and colored by the oxygen with which it is

brought in contact in the lungs—it is easy to understand how perfect

food may create perfect blood, which shall presently supplant that

which is feeble, that which is lacking in waste-repairing power, that

which fails to give strength to the muscles or vigor to the brain,

and may thus become the most effective medicine. A perusal of recent

professional medical literature evinces the great stress which is now

laid upon dietetics in the treatment of all diseases. The approach to

this high altitude has been gradual, but sure. At first foods were made

the vehicles for drugs; and cod-liver oil and malt-extracts, which are

only concentrated foods of the hydro-carbon varieties, were loaded with

lime and iron and strychnine and phosphorous and scores of other drugs.

But perfect results were secured by the use of these foods without

the drug additions, and so the foods were at last given the credit

which all along belonged to them. And so it has come to pass that with

advanced medical men, in a vast majority of cases of sickness, the

support of the life-powers by proper nutrients is the foremost thought,

the best food proving to be the best medicine.

The kind of food a man eats, and the time and manner of his eating it,

are not merely a question of medicine, but one of the first questions

of morals. The effects of food on the passions and feelings are thus

described by Prior:

“Observe the various operations

Of food and drink in several nations;

Was ever Tartar fierce and cruel

Upon the strength of water gruel?

But who shall stand his rage and force

When first he rides, then eats, his horse?

Salads and eggs and lighter fare,

Tune the Italian spark’s guitar;

And if I take Don Confrere right,

Pudding and beef make Britons fight.”

If, therefore, our meat has something to do with our morals, or if our

food in some way affects our faith, it seems to me that many of our

efforts at moral reform ought to be preceded by instruction in hygiene.

In other words, efforts to make a man genuinely devotional ought to be

prefaced by efforts to correct bad dietetic habits. A father, by prayer

and precept and flogging, had done his best to reform his boy, whose

staple diet was meat and sausage and pie and cake at his meals, with

lunch between. The family physician said to the father, “If you will

put a leech back of each of your boy’s ears once a week for a month,

you will do more to reform him than your preaching and pounding will do

in a year.” The father asked for the philosophy of this prescription.

“Why,” said the doctor, “your boy has bad blood, and too much of it;

he must behave badly or he would burst.” “Then,” said the father,

“I’ll change his diet from beef and pie to hominy and milk.” In three

months thereafter a better boy for his age could not be found in the

neighborhood. The acrid, biting, evil blood had not become food for

leeches, but it had done its wicked work and passed away, and a cooler,

blander, purer, safer blood had been supplied from sweeter, gentler

food sources.

In your use of animal food be very particular as to quality and

quantity. Lamb and mutton are considered the most healthy by the

authorities. Avoid as you would contagion the use of pork, unless you

raise it yourselves, and feed it with good grain, and not the refuse

of the house or barn, and keep the animals as clean as you do your pet

dogs. Never fry your meat with hogs’ lard, but stew, bake, boil, or

broil it. Use hogs’ lard in no form for cooking. Most of it is said to

be reeking with scrofulous elements. Displace it in _all_ your cooking

by milk or butter. If you want to aid and not hinder the growth of your

soul Godward, if you desire to have pure thoughts and a pure heart and

a pure life, see that you make your blood out of pure food, or you

will find that your soul will have an enemy within the castle of its

body more treacherous and deadly than any of its enemies without.

There is another popular article of food among us, which has a vital

connection with bodily disorders and bad exhibition of character. Good

in proper quantities and in its sphere, when made the largest and chief

article of diet, for every meal, the one kind of food upon which we

depend most for building up the wastes of our bodies, it indirectly

does great damage. I refer to the ordinary fine flour bread made out of

bolted wheat meal.

It is proper to remember that the white flour from which our bread

is chiefly made, and which is deemed the staff of life, is a purely

artificial product—a selection from that perfect food combination

which exists in wheat. A competent food chemist has compared the

regular milling processes to one by which the fat part of an ox should

be saved for food, and the lean part—the albuminous or nitrogenous

portion—discarded and given to the dogs. The comparison is well based,

since the starch of wheat, which is valued because of its whiteness,

is a carbo-hydrate, chemically allied to the fat of meat; while the

dark nutriment of wheat, which, because of its color, is discarded with

the bran with which it is found in contact in nature, is a vegetable

nitrogenous albumen, rich in mineral elements, and almost identical,

chemically, with the lean or muscular tissue of beef.

The process of bolting or refining takes from the wheat most of the

phosphates and nitrates, the elements that are chiefly required for

making nerves, muscles, bones, and brains. The phosphates and nitrates

being removed by bolting, very little remains in the flour except

the starchy carbonates, the heat and fat producing elements. The use

of fine flour bread as a staple article of food introduces too much

heat and fat-producing elements into the system, and where there is

too much carbon or heating substance, it tends rather to provoke the

system to unnatural and abnormal action, and instead of serving as an

element to warm the body, its tendency is to burn or consume, heating

and irritating all the organs, getting one into that state which is

popularly known as “hot-blooded.” The fine white flour ordinarily

used has two-thirds of the nitrogenous and mineral nutriment that God

put in the wheat taken out. Unless these deficiencies are made up by

some other foods, the exclusive use of fine flour bread will leave

the nerves and bones poorly nourished, producing in some systems

nervousness, dyspepsia, and all the physical ills that follow these

diseases, together with impatience, fretfulness, and irritability. God

intended that all the nutritive properties He put in the wheat should

stay in it for purposes of symmetrical nourishment. Fine flour bread

may be used for purposes of producing heat in the system, but it does

not feed hungry nerves or starving bones.

One reason why children fed chiefly on white bread feel hungry nearly

all the time, and demand so much food between meals, is found in the

fact that their bodies are insufficiently nourished. Their bones

and nerves not receiving the nitrates and phosphates they need, are

suffering from hunger.

When children are fed with food that thoroughly nourishes their whole

system, they will seldom desire to eat between meals and thus retard

the process of digestion and lay the foundation for dyspepsia and all

its kindred evils.

Flour made of all the nutriment of pure white wheat, unbolted, yet

without the shell or husk or bran, contains all the elements necessary

for the nourishment of the body. The flour called Graham flour rarely

contains these elements. There is a great deal of bogus stuff in the

market, which has brought the genuine article into disrepute, and made

many thoughtful people disgusted with everything in that line. Very

much that is called Graham flour is made up of a mixture of fine bolted

flour, and the woody fibre of the wheat, which has no nutriment in it

at all. This wretched fabrication has tended to make all whole wheat

products unpopular. The woody bran is worse than worthless as food,

or to mix with food. You might as well eat the shells of nuts, or the

husks of corn, or the skins of potatoes, as the silex coats of wheat.

To overload the alimentary canal with such foreign indigestible matter

has no other tendency but to weaken and debilitate it. Very few millers

trouble themselves to make a perfect whole wheat flour. I know but one

establishment in the world where wheat and other grains are treated

precisely as they should be, with all the harmful part removed and the

rest made digestible by harmless methods, and that is the Health Food

Company of New York.[1]

[1] See Appendix, page 30.

Bread leavened, or unleavened, made out of what is called the Cold

Blast Whole Wheat Flour, makes more muscle and furnishes more food for

the nerves than any other article of food given to man except the pure

gluten of wheat. I am not now advocating the views of the extremists,

the Grahamites, neither do I counsel the disuse of fine flour bread.

This latter should be used in connection with unbolted flour, but

should not be relied on to furnish you with all the nutritious elements

that your bodies need. There is a golden mean between the extremes

of vegetarianism and exclusive flesh diet which the common sense of

thoughtful people will find. During the warm season a diet made up

chiefly of fruits, grains, and vegetables will be most healthful

for body and soul. Instead of the scrofula-breeding pork or ham for

breakfast, use some one of the great variety of grains, especially

oat-meal, than which there are few better foods for growing children

and hard working adults. Instead of fried cakes, rich pastry, and

candies, use fruit, of which there is an abundant variety, ten-fold

more nourishing than pies or cakes, and very cleansing to the blood.

Let brown bread, Johnnie-cake, and corn-meal pudding supplant fine

wheat bread as much as possible. Eat your meals regularly and slowly,

eating nothing between them. Eat sparingly of meat at mid-day, and let

it be good fresh beef, mutton, or fish, well cooked. Let the evening

meal be taken not later than six o’clock. Discard tea and coffee, and

make your own coffee with browned crusts of bread, or burned whole

wheat.[2] Follow these suggestions and you will find very many of the

ills of your body departing and very many of the troubles you have in

behaving yourselves, vanishing.

[2] The Health Food Company prepare a “Cereal Coffee” from Wheat Gluten

and Barley, which not only makes a delicious beverage, but tends

to greatly strengthen both body and brain. Those who would release

themselves from the dangerous practice of tea-drinking, and the less

injurious but still objectionable use of the commercial coffees, will

do well to try this nutrient beverage.

Again, we derange our bodies and demoralize our souls by eating too

much. The great end of life with many of us is to eat. The American

dining-room has become, for the most part, a place for the indulgence

of animalism, and not for the development of the affections or social

qualities. A distinguished American physician said: “I am sixty-six

years old, and I have eaten enough food to answer my wants for 100

years, and yet I am what most people call a small eater.” The popular

habit of using, inordinately, appetizers in the shape of the ordinary

table condiments, begets a false and unnatural appetite. The time comes

when honest food palls upon the depraved senses. The pampered, jaded

appetite no longer finds satisfaction in simple food-flavors; the

palate must be prompted with pungent things. The cook, who is never a

physiologist, responds to the demand for spurs to appetite, and finds

them in mixtures of spices and peppers and mustards and acids and

essential oils and chemicals, and multitudes of non-food substances.

With these, and various biting alcohols, the delicate lining of the

stomach is inflamed, inducing a desire for food which passes for what

it is not, namely, honest appetite. The palate demands more food than

the stomach can digest or the system assimilate. Poor nature, anxious

to do the best she can, adapts herself to the unnatural situation,

and forces all the other organs to do the same; and thus we become

accustomed to over-eating and do not know it.

That all who accustom themselves to a stimulating diet, to spices and

wines and other irritating things, consume too much food, cannot, I

think, be gainsayed. The amount and kind of food needed depends upon

the individual habits and the kind of waste to be supplied. A wholly

idle man should thrive well on cucumbers and water-melons, which are

chiefly water; while the hard-working hod-carrier would demand several

pounds of solid carbon and nitrogen daily. It is the sedentary, the

well-to-do, the man of leisure, who suffers most from over-eating; and

it behooves him to carefully avoid all goads and spurs to appetite.

With the simplest flavors he is nearly certain to over-eat and thus to

suffer. With an appetite stimulated and induced, without corresponding

out-door labor to create a genuine need and demand for it, digestive

failure and assimilative bankruptcy is only a question of time.

The stomach, overloaded, performs its work imperfectly, and thus

imposes on all the organs an extra amount of work, which breaks them

down prematurely, causing diseases of every kind, such as nervous

headache, sick headache, rush of blood to the head, apoplexy, sore

eyes, deafness, erysipelas, neuralgia of the face, decayed teeth,

catarrh, bronchitis, asthma, nausea, common colic, congestion of the

liver, and a host of other diseases too unpleasant to mention. In some

cases there is a disposition of too much fatty matter in the system;

and many people suppose that fatness is a sign of healthfulness, which

is false. No one needs any more fat on his body than is essential to

form cushions for his tendons and muscles; if too much, there is a

depletion of strength.

The crowded and overloaded condition of the system makes the body take

on very many false manifestations. The irritation produced in an

overcharged system manifests itself in different forms in different

individuals. In some it produces nervousness, making them rack the

flesh off their bones and keeping them poor; and in others it produces

sluggishness, retaining defunct matter in the system, making them

corpulent. As I have said, our highly-seasoned foods create morbid and

abnormal appetites.

As a consequence we eat too much and too often, the system being borne

down by overwork in its digestive department, there comes a demand for

stimulating drinks and medicines to take off the depression and to keep

up tone; and to make ourselves feel good, after having made ourselves

feel bad, by improper eating, some of us resort to tea and coffee, and

others to alcohol, and then the excitement produced demands a sedative,

and some of us smoke and others chew a poisonous weed called tobacco.

Thus the poor body, subject to these revulsions of unnatural action in

overwork and stimulation and sedation, is goaded to abnormities and

unnatural action, sending up to the soul no other influences but those

which drive it to moral madness and vicious deeds.

Now, vice is a morbid exhibition of the will. The will is represented

through the physical organ, the brain, and the brain is straightway

affected by the condition of the body and the state of the blood. The

will is that power of the mind by which we put forth volitions and

perform actions. If the pressure of bad blood is on the brain, that

same pressure is on the will; hence a sick man or a diseased man will

do a great many bad things through the power of bad blood on the will.

Vice, then, is both the result and cause of physical derangement.

Hence that vice of vices, drunkenness.

Drunkenness may be caused by bad physical conditions, brought about

by bad habits of eating. Would it not be well for us to look into

bad table habits for one of the reasons why so many of our young men

become drunkards? May there not be some cause working in the flesh

of our youths, driving them to intemperance? May it not be possible

that kind fathers and mothers for years have been filling up the awful

gap of 40,000 dead drunkards annually by feeding their children upon

stimulating, highly-seasoned, innutritious foods? There is no doubt

in my mind that every man is a glutton before he is a drunkard. If

nature’s laws are violated, a man’s sensations will be all abnormal,

and the mainsprings of his life will be befouled, and the result

will be irregular and vicious expressions of all the appetites, both

for food and drink. I am, therefore, confident that the widespread

appetite for intoxicating liquors is largely due to the false relations

that the American people hold to their food. We cannot hope much

from moral suasion and legal enactments so long as we overlook the

physical condition of the drunkard. If you would cure disease or vice

effectually, you must shut off that which nourishes them, instead of

putting all your force in efforts to antidote them. “Let the wicked

forsake his way,” and then turn unto the Lord, and he will have mercy

on him, and to our God, and he will abundantly pardon him. There are

200,000 drunkards in the United States, 40,000 of whom go annually to

premature graves. There are 20,000 prostitutes, whose average life

in their profession is four years. Do you believe this vast army of

immortals go willingly to ruin? There are causes lying back of mere

perversities of soul in the common every-day dietetic habits of these

forlorn ones.

Eating and drinking are always associated with the bar and brothel,

and if you will take notice, the eating is always of that kind of

food which goes straight for the animal nature, and wakes up in a man

everything that is beastly.

The whole tendency of the food furnished at the popular bar-room

restaurant is to stir the baser elements in humanity and keep up the

demand for alcoholic stimulants. No wonder the drinking saloons can

afford to give what they call a “free lunch.” Care is taken to furnish

such food as fires the appetite for strong drink, and the rum-seller

gets his pay for his “free lunch” through the sale of the whisky that

must inevitably follow it. Those who, living on highly stimulating

foods, but do not drink strong drinks, will find that the bias of their

bodily powers, instead of being toward mental and spiritual spheres,

will be toward animal indulgences, dragging the mind and soul into

servitude to the flesh, and where there are any moral aspirations,

making the conflict between the higher and lower nature so intense that

a vast amount of moral force is wasted in self-conflict that ought to

go into the world’s redemptive agencies for saving the lost.

I am confident that the American habit of eating sumptuous and late

suppers, whether at our homes or church fairs or festivals, is damaging

the physical, mental, and moral health of our nation more than any

other one thing of its kind; more damaging, because it has the

appearance of innocency, and the sanction of our fathers and mothers

and some of our pastors.

Furthermore, the habit of eating hurriedly, or hastily, is preying

upon the vital and moral forces of many of us. A meal eaten hastily or

nervously, under the pressure of intense mental activity or nervous

tension, or great weariness, begins its work of nutrition under the

greatest possible disadvantage. All our meals should be eaten calmly

and deliberately, so as to thoroughly masticate the food, and not

impose on the stomach and viscera the legitimate work of the teeth.

In the interest of health to soul as well as body I enter an earnest

plea for more time for eating, and especially at noon, when most hard

working people take their principal meal. Clerks, business men, and

school teachers, mechanics, laborers, and our children who attend the

public schools, need more time at noon to properly dispose of the chief

meal of the day. No better investment could be made to secure the best

possible physical, intellectual, financial, and moral returns than for

all classes of people to take two hours at mid-day for resting and

eating dinner. Selfish greed demands otherwise, and makes a show of

gain; but the loss is sure to come in due time to all parties concerned.

My friends, when will we fast-living, fast-eating, fast-working, and

fast-dying Americans learn the great lesson, that life is a unit,

that the Divine Trinity in us, namely, the physical, intellectual,

and spiritual, is one life, with different phases of expression; and

whatever mars one mars the whole, and whatever builds up one most

surely builds up the others? All our powers are many members in one

body, with an inter-dependence which is eternal. Slight your body,

and you smite your soul and enervate the mind. Corrupt the mind, and

you debase both body and soul. When will those who profess to be God’s

children by the adoption of the Holy Ghost, catch the Spirit of His

great Apostle Paul, who, more than any other sacred writer, maintained

the sanctity of the human body and its subservience to the mind and

soul. Hear him: “I beseech you, brethren, by the mercies of God that

ye present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto God,

which is your reasonable service, and be not conformed to this world,

but be ye transformed by the renewing of your minds, that ye may prove

what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.” I admit the

power of the Holy Ghost in the work of regeneration, but is there not

something for us to do, in keeping our bodies under, “lest we become

cast-aways?” I do not say that _all_ human evils and ills have their

primary origin in physical habits, but I do say that the great mass

of impulsions from the excited, inflamed, over-stimulated body toward

the soul, are in the interests of sin. The economy of salvation orders

otherwise. By the Gospel the body may become the temple of the Holy

Ghost. By the law of self-denial of the New Testament, our bodies, with

all their fiery elements, may be made an inspiration to our souls.

It is not the purpose of God that a life-time warfare shall be kept

up between the body and the soul. There ought to come to every true

Christian a day of final victory over his bodily powers, in which they

will cease their rebellion, and come into the sweetest union with the

soul in its great work of developing a likeness to Christ.

Why are we called upon to present the body a living sacrifice to God,

if its powers are not to be sanctified to holy purposes? Why should we

spend all our life waiting for the adoption of our whole nature, to

wit, the redemption of the body, as well as the soul.

Our fondest dreams for the progress of humanity must be based in a

newly created body by strict obedience to the laws of God, written on

every fibre, tissue, muscle, and bone. We cannot develop the human

brain and heart to the possibilities that God has put in them, while

they are the tenants of bodies the laws of which are violated in the

commonest habits of every-day life.

Regeneration does a mighty work for us; but generation has also much

to do with our highest and best development. The sins of the fathers

must cease, so that the sons may be spared their terrible visitations;

the accumulated virtues of parents must roll over on their children in

purer, stronger, and better bodies until by a blessed economy the whole

race shall be exalted to heirship with Christ through loving obedience

to all the laws of physical as well as moral life.

Why may we not now, under the laws of redemption, begin to build a new

heaven and a new earth, new souls and new bodies. If our souls are

redeemed and renewed by obedience and faith, why not secure also the

redemption of our bodies? I know it is slow work to teach the subtle

but mighty elements of self-restraint. I know the flesh lusteth against

the spirit. Yet I thank God who giveth us the victory through our Lord

Jesus Christ.

Food and Morals 6th Edition · 第 5 / 40 题