"No friends!" I repeated to myself, as I walked away. "Happily-situated

vagrant! there is the true cause of your superiority over me--you have no

friends! But can the marvellous assertion be true? Can this enviable man

really go home and touch up his speech for to-morrow, with the certainty

of not being interrupted? I am going home to finish an article, without

knowing whether I shall have a clear five minutes to myself, all the

time I am at work. Can he take his money back to his drawer, in broad

daylight, and meet nobody by the way who will say to him, 'Remember our

old friendship, and lend me a trifle'? I have money waiting for me at my

publisher's, and I dare not go and fetch it, except under cover of the

night. Is that spoilt child of fortune, from whom I have just separated

myself, really and truly never asked to parties and obliged to go to them?

He has a button on his coat--I am positively certain I saw it--and is

there no human finger and thumb to lay hold of it, and no human tongue to

worry him, the while? He does not live in the times of the pillory, and

he has his ears--the lucky wretch. Have those organs actually enjoyed the

indescribable blessedness of freedom from the intrusion of 'well-meant

advice'? Can he write--and has he got no letters to answer? Can he

read--and has he no dear friend's book to get through, whether he likes it

or not? No wonder that he looks prosperous and healthy, though he lives

in a dingy slum, and that I look peevish and pale, though I reside on

gravel, in an airy neighbourhood. Good Heavens! does he dare to speak of

his misfortunes, when he has no calls to make? Irrational Sybarite! what

does he want next, I wonder?"

* * * * *

These are crabbed sentiments. But, perhaps, as it is the fashion,

now-a-days, to take an inveterately genial view of society in general, my

present outbreak of misanthropy may be pardoned, in consideration of its

involving a certain accidental originality of expression in relation to

social subjects. It is a dreadful thing to say; but it is the sad truth

that I have never yet been able to appreciate the advantage of having a

large circle of acquaintances, and that I could positively dispense with

a great many of my dearest friends.

* * * * *

There is my Boisterous Friend, for instance--an excellent creature, who

has been intimate with me from childhood, and who loves me as his brother.

I always know when he calls, though my study is at the top of the house. I

hear him in the passage, the moment the door is opened--he is so hearty;

and, like other hearty people, he has such a loud voice. I have told my

servant to say that I am engaged, which means simply, that I am hard at

work. "Dear old boy!" I hear my Boisterous Friend exclaim, with a genial

roar, "writing away, just as usual--eh, Susan? Lord bless you! he knows

me--he knows I don't want to interrupt him. Up-stairs, of course? I know

my way. Just for a minute, Susan--just for a minute." The voice stops,

and heavily-shod feet (all boisterous men wear thick boots) ascend the

stairs, two at a time. My door is burst open, as if with a battering-ram

(no boisterous man ever knocks), and my friend rushes in like a mad bull.

"Ha, ha, ha! I've caught you," says the associate of my childhood. "Don't

stop for me, dear old boy; I'm not going to interrupt you (bless my soul,

what a lot of writing!)--and you're all right, eh? That's all I wanted to

know. By George, it's quite refreshing to see you here forming the public

mind! No! I won't sit down; I won't stop another instant. So glad to have

seen you, dear fellow--good-bye." By this time, his affectionate voice

has made the room ring again; he has squeezed my hand, in his brotherly

way, till my fingers are too sore to hold the pen; and he has put to

flight, for the rest of the day, every idea that I had when I sat down to

work. And yet (as he would tell me himself) he has not been in the room

more than a minute--though he might well have stopped for hours, without

doing any additional harm. Could I really dispense with him? I don't deny

that he has known me from the time when I was in short frocks, and that

he loves me like a brother. Nevertheless, I could dispense--yes, I could

dispense--oh, yes, I could dispense--with my Boisterous Friend.

Again, there is my Domestic Friend, whose time for calling on me is late

in the afternoon, when I have wrought through my day's task; and when a

quiet restorative half-hour by myself, over the fire, is precious to me

beyond all power of expression. There is my Domestic Friend, who comes

to me at such times, and who has no subject of conversation but the

maladies of his wife and children. No efforts that I can make to change

the subject, can get me out of the range of the family sick-room. If

I start the weather, I lead to a harrowing narrative of its effect on

Mrs. Ricketts, or the Master and Miss Rickettses. If I try politics or

literature, my friend apologises for knowing nothing about any recent

events in which ministers or writers are concerned, by telling me how

his time has been taken up by illness at home. If I attempt to protect

myself by asking him to meet a large party, where the conversation must

surely be on general topics, he brings his wife with him (though he

told me, when I invited her, that she was unable to stir from her bed),

and publicly asks her how she feels, at certain intervals; wafting that

affectionate question across the table, as easily as if he was handing

the salt-cellar, or passing the bottle. I have given up defending myself

against him of late, in sheer despair. I am resigned to my fate. Though

not a family man, I know (through the vast array of facts in connection

with the subject, with which my friend has favoured me) as much about the

maladies of young mothers and their children, as the doctor himself. Does

any other unmedical man know when half a pint of raw brandy may be poured

down the throat of a delicate and sensitive woman, without producing the

slightest effect on her, except of the restorative kind? I know when it

may be done--when it must be done--when, I give you my sacred word of

honour, the exhibition of alcohol in large quantities, may be the saving

of one precious life--ay, sir, and perhaps of two! Possibly it may yet

prove a useful addition to my stores of information, to know what I

know now on such interesting subjects as these. It may be so--but, good

Christian people, it is not the less true, that I could also dispense with

my Domestic Friend.

My Country Friends--I must not forget them--and least of all, my

hospitable hostess, Lady Jinkinson, who is in certain respects the type

and symbol of my whole circle of rural acquaintance.

Lady Jinkinson is the widow of a gallant general officer. She has a

charming place in the country. She has also sons who are splendid fellows,

and daughters who are charming girls. She has a cultivated taste for

literature--so have the charming girls--so have not the splendid fellows.

She thinks a little attention to literary men is very becoming in persons

of distinction; and she is good enough to ask me to come and stay at her

country-house, where a room shall be specially reserved for me, and where

I can write my "fine things" in perfect quiet, away from London noises

and London interruptions. I go to the country-house with my work in my

portmanteau--work which must be done by a certain time. I find a charming

little room made ready for me, opening into my bed-room, and looking out

on the lovely garden-terrace, and the noble trees in the park beyond. I

come down to breakfast in the morning; and after the second cup of tea.

I get up to return to my writing-room. A chorus of family remonstrances

rises instantly. Oh, surely I am not going to begin writing on the very

first day. Look at the sun, listen to the birds, feel the sweet air. A

drive in the country, after the London smoke, is absolutely necessary--a

drive to Shockley Bottom, and a picnic luncheon (so nice!), and back by

Grimshawe's Folly (such a view from the top!), and a call, on the way

home, at the Abbey, that lovely old house, where the dear Squire has

had my last book read aloud to him (only think of that! the very last

thing in the world that I could possibly have expected!) by darling Emily

and Matilda, who are both dying to know me. Possessed by a (printer's)

devil, I gruffly break through this string of temptations to be idle, and

resolutely make my escape.

"Lunch at half-past one," says Lady Jinkinson, as I retire.

"Pray, don't wait for me," I answer.

"Lunch at half-past one," persists Lady Jinkinson, as if she thought I

had not heard her.

"And cigars in the billiard-room," adds one of the splendid fellows.

"And in the green-house, too," continues one of the charming girls, "where

your horrid smoking is really of some use."

I shut the door desperately. The last words I hear are from Lady

Jinkinson. "Lunch at half-past one."

I get into my writing-room, and take the following inventory of the

contents:--

Table of rare inlaid woods, on which a drop of ink would be downright

ruin. Silver inkstand of enormous size, holding about a thimbleful of

ink. Clarified pens in scented papier-mâché box. Blotting-book lined with

crimson watered silk, full of violet and rose-coloured note-paper with the

Jinkinson crest stamped in silver at the top of each leaf. Pen-wiper, of

glossy new cloth, all ablaze with beads; tortoise-shell paper-knife; also

paper-weight, exhibiting a view of the Colosseum in rare Mosaic; also,

light green taper, in ebony candlestick; wax in scented box; matches in

scented box; pencil-tray made of fine gold, with a turquoise eruption

breaking out all over it. Upon the whole, about two hundred pounds' worth

of valuable property, as working materials for me to write with.

I remove every portable article carefully from the inlaid table--look

about me for the most worthless thing I can discover to throw over it, in

case of ink-splashes,--find nothing worthless in the room, except my own

summer paletôt,--take that, accordingly, and make a cloth of it,--pull

out my battered old writing-case, with my provision of cheap paper, and

my inky steel pen in my two-penny holder. With these materials before

me on my paletôt (price one guinea), I endeavour to persuade myself, by

carefully abstaining from looking about the room, that I am immersed in

my customary squalor, and upheld by my natural untidiness. After a little

while, I succeed in the effort, and begin to work.

Birds. The poets are all fond of birds. Can they write, I wonder, when

their favourites are singing in chorus close outside their window? I,

who only produce prose, find birds a nuisance. Cows also. Has that one

particular cow who bellows so very regularly, a bereavement to mourn?

I think we shall have veal for dinner to-day; I do think we shall have

nice veal and stuffing. But this is not the train of thought I ought to

be engaged in. Let me be deaf to these pastoral noises (including the

sharpening of the gardener's scythe on the lawn), and get on with my work.

Tum-dum-tiddy-hidy-dum--tom-tom-tiddy-hiddy-tom--ti-too-tidy-hidy-ti--

ti-ti-ti-tum. Yes, yes, that famous tenor bit in the Trovatore, played

with prodigious fire on the piano in the room below, by one of the

charming girls. I like the Trovatore (not being, fortunately for

myself, a musical critic). Let me lean back in my chair on this balmy

morning--writing being now clearly out of the question--and float away

placidly on the stream of melody. Brava! Brava! Bravissima! She is

going through the whole opera, now in one part of it, and now in

another. No, she stops, after only an hour's practice. A voice calls

to her; I hear her ringing laugh, in answer: no more piano--silence.

Work, work, you must be done! Oh, my ideas, my only stock in trade,

mercifully come back to me--or, like the famous Roman, I have lost a

day.

Let me see; where was I when the Trovatore began? At the following passage

apparently, for the sentence is left unfinished.

"_The farther we enter into this interesting subject, the more light_"----

What had I got to say about light, when the Trovatore began? Was it,

"flows in upon us"? No; nothing so commonplace as that. I had surely a

good long metaphor, and a fine round close to the sentence. "The more

light"----shines? beams? bursts? dawns? floods? bathes? quivers? Oh, me!

what was the precious next word I had in my head, when the Trovatore took

possession of my poor crazy brains? It is useless to search for it. Strike

out "the more light," and try something else.

"_The farther we enter into this interesting subject, the more prodigally

we find scattered before us the gems of truth which--so seldom ride over

to see us now._"

"So seldom ride over to see us now?" Mercy on me, what am I about?

Ending my unfortunate sentence by mechanically taking down a few polite

words, spoken by the melodious voice of one of the charming girls on the

garden-terrace under my window. What do I hear, in a man's voice? "Regret

being so long an absentee, but my schools and my poor"--Oh, a young

clerical visitor; I know him by his way of talking. All young clergymen

speak alike--who teaches them, I wonder? Let me peep out of window.

I am right. It is a young clergyman--no whiskers, apostolic hair, sickly

smile, long frock coat, a wisp of muslin round his neck, and a canonical

black waistcoat with no gap in it for the display of profane linen. The

charming girl is respectfully devouring him with her eyes. Are they going

to have their morning chat under my window? Evidently they are. This

is pleasant. Every word of their small, fluent, ceaseless, sentimental

gabble comes into my room. If I ask them to get out of hearing I am rude.

If I go to the window, and announce my presence by a cough, I confuse

the charming girl. No help for it, but to lay the pen down again, and

wait. This is a change for the worse, with a vengeance. The Trovatore was

something pleasant to listen to; but the reverend gentleman's opinions

on the terrace flowers which he has come to admire; on the last volume of

modern poetry which he has borrowed from the charming girl; on the merits

of the church system in the Ages of Faith, and on the difficulties he

has had to contend with in his Infant School, are, upon the whole, rather

wearisome to listen to. And this is the house that I entered in the full

belief that it would offer me the luxury of perfect quiet to work in! And

down stairs sits Lady Jinkinson, firmly believing that she has given me

such an opportunity of distinguishing myself with my pen, as I have never

before enjoyed in all my life! Patience, patience.

Half an hour; three quarters of an hour. Do I hear him taking his leave?

Yes, at last. Pen again; paper again. Where was I?

"_The farther we enter into this interesting subject, the more prodigally

do we find scattered before us the gems of truth, which_"----

What was I going to say the gems of truth did, when the young clergyman

and the charming girl began their sentimental interview on the terrace?

Gone--utterly gone. Strike out the gems of truth, and try another way.

"_The farther we enter into this interesting subject, the more its vast

capabilities_"----

A knock at the door.

"Yes."

"Her Ladyship wishes me to say, sir, that luncheon is ready."

"Very well."

* * * * *

"_The farther we enter into this interesting subject, the more clearly

its vast capabilities display themselves to our view. The mind, indeed,

can hardly be pronounced competent_"----

A knock at the door.

"Yes."

"Her Ladyship wishes me to remind you, sir, that luncheon is ready."

"Pray beg Lady Jinkinson not to wait for me."

* * * * *

"_The mind, indeed, can hardly be pronounced competent to survey the

extended field of observation_"----

A knock at the door.

"Yes."

"I beg your pardon, sir, but her Ladyship desires me to say that a friar's

omelette has just come up, which she very much wishes you to taste. And

she is afraid it will get cold, unless you will be so good as to come

down-stairs at once."

"Say, I will come directly."

* * * * *

"_The mind, indeed, can hardly be pronounced competent to survey the

extended field of observation, which_"--which?--which?--Gone again! What

else could I expect? A nice chance literature has in this house against

luncheon.

I descend to the dining-room, and am politely told that I look as if I had

just achieved a wonderful morning's work. "I dare say you have not written

in such perfect quiet as this for months past?" says Lady Jinkinson,

helping me to the friar's omelette. I begin with that dainty: where I

end is more than my recollection enables me to say. Everybody feeds me,

under the impression that I am exhausted with writing. All the splendid

fellows will drink wine with me, "to set me going again." Nobody believes

my rueful assertion that I have done nothing, which they ascribe to

excessive modesty. When we rise from table (a process which is performed

with extreme difficulty, speaking for myself), I am told that the carriage

will be ready in an hour. Lady Jinkinson will not hear of any objections.

"No! no!" she says. "I have not asked you here to overwork yourself. I

really can't allow that."

I get back to my room, with an extraordinary tightness in my waistcoat,

and with slight symptoms of a determination of Sherry to the head. Under

these circumstances, returning to work immediately is not to be thought

of. Returning to bed is by far the wiser proceeding. I lie down to arrange

my ideas. Having none to arrange, I yield to Nature, and go to sleep.

When I wake, my head is clear again. I see my way now to the end of that

bit about "the extended field of observation;" and make for my table in

high spirits. Just as I sit down, comes another knock at the door. The

carriage is ready. The carriage! I had forgotten all about it. There

is no way of escape, however. Hours must give way to me, when I am at

home; I must give way to hours, when I am at Lady Jinkinson's. My papers

are soon shuffled together in my case; and I am once more united with

the hospitable party down-stairs. "More bright ideas?" cry the ladies

interrogatively, as I take my place in the carriage. "Not the dimmest

vestige of one," I answer. Lady Jinkinson shakes her parasol reproachfully

at me. "My dear friend, you were always absurdly modest when speaking of

yourself; and, do you know, I think it grows on you."

We get back in time to dress for dinner. After dinner, there is the

social evening, and more Trovatore. After that, cigars with the splendid

fellows in the billiard-room. I look over my day's work, with the calmness

of despair, when I get to bed at last. It amounts to four sentences

and a half; every line of which is perfectly worthless as a literary

composition.

The next morning, I rise before the rest of the family are up, leave a

note of apology on my table, and take the early train for London. This

is very ungrateful behaviour to people who have treated me with extreme

kindness. But here, again, I must confess the hard truth. The demands

of my business in life are imperative; and, sad to say, they absolutely

oblige me to dispense with Lady Jinkinson.

* * * * *

I have now been confessing my misanthropical sentiments at some length;

but I have not by any means done yet with the number of my dear friends

whom I could dispense with. To say nothing of my friend who borrows

money of me (an obvious nuisance), there is my self-satisfied friend, who

can talk of nothing but himself, and his successes in life; there is my

inattentive friend, who is perpetually asking me irrelevant questions,

and who has no power of listening to my answers; there is my accidental

friend, whom I always meet when I go out; there is my hospitable friend,

who is continually telling me that he wants so much to ask me to dinner,

and who never does really ask me by any chance. All these intimate

associates of mine are persons of fundamentally irreproachable characters,

and of well-defined positions in the world; and yet so unhappily is my

nature constituted, that I am not exaggerating when I acknowledge that I

could positively dispense with every one of them.

To proceed a little farther, now that I have begun to unburden my mind--

* * * * *

A double knock at the street door stops my pen suddenly. I make no

complaint, for I have been, to my own amazement, filling these pages for

the last three hours, in my parlour after dinner, without interruption.

A well-known voice in the passage smites my ear, inquiring for me, on

very particular business, and asking the servant to take in the name. The

servant appears at my door, and I make up my mind to send these leaves

to the printer, unfinished as they are. No necessity, Susan, to mention

the name; I have recognised the voice. This is my friend who does not at

all like the state of my health. He comes, I know beforehand, with the

address of a new doctor, or the recipe of a new remedy; and he will stay

for hours, persuading me that I am in a bad way. No escaping from him, as

I know by experience. Well, well, I have made my confession, and eased my

mind. Let my friend who doesn't like the state of my health, end the list,

for the present, of the dear friends whom I could dispense with. Show him

in, Susan--show him in.

CASES WORTH LOOKING AT.--III.

THE CAULDRON OF OIL.

About one French league distant from the city of Toulouse, there is a

village called Croix-Daurade. In the military history of England, this

place is associated with a famous charge of the eighteenth hussars, which

united two separated columns of the British army, on the day before the

Duke of Wellington fought the battle of Toulouse. In the criminal history

of France, the village is memorable as the scene of a daring crime, which

was discovered and punished under circumstances sufficiently remarkable

to merit preservation in the form of a plain narrative.

I. THE PERSONS OF THE DRAMA.

In the year seventeen hundred, the resident priest of the village of

Croix-Daurade was Monsieur Pierre-Célestin Chaubard. He was a man of no

extraordinary energy or capacity, simple in his habits, and sociable

in his disposition. His character was irreproachable; he was strictly

conscientious in the performance of his duties; and he was universally

respected and beloved by all his parishioners.

Among the members of his flock, there was a family named Siadoux. The head

of the household, Saturnin Siadoux, had been long established in business

at Croix-Daurade as an oil-manufacturer. At the period of the events now

to be narrated, he had attained the age of sixty, and was a widower. His

family consisted of five children--three young men, who helped him in the

business, and two daughters. His nearest living relative was his sister,

the widow Mirailhe.

The widow resided principally at Toulouse. Her time in that city was

mainly occupied in winding up the business affairs of her deceased

husband, which had remained unsettled for a considerable period after

his death, through delays in realising certain sums of money owing to his

representative. The widow had been left very well provided for--she was

still a comely attractive woman--and more than one substantial citizen

of Toulouse had shown himself anxious to persuade her into marrying for

the second time. But the widow Mirailhe lived on terms of great intimacy

and affection with her brother Siadoux and his family; she was sincerely

attached to them, and sincerely unwilling, at her age, to deprive her

nephews and nieces, by a second marriage, of the inheritance, or even of

a portion of the inheritance, which would otherwise fall to them on her

death. Animated by these motives, she closed her doors resolutely on all

suitors who attempted to pay their court to her, with the one exception

of a master-butcher of Toulouse, whose name was Cantegrel.

This man was a neighbour of the widow's, and had made himself useful by

assisting her in the business complications which still hung about the

realisation of her late husband's estate. The preference which she showed

for the master-butcher was, thus far, of the purely negative kind. She

gave him no absolute encouragement; she would not for a moment admit

that there was the slightest prospect of her ever marrying him--but, at

the same time, she continued to receive his visits, and she showed no

disposition to restrict the neighbourly intercourse between them, for the

future, within purely formal bounds. Under these circumstances, Saturnin

Siadoux began to be alarmed, and to think it time to bestir himself.

He had no personal acquaintance with Cantegrel, who never visited the

village; and Monsieur Chaubard (to whom he might otherwise have applied

for advice) was not in a position to give an opinion: the priest and the

master-butcher did not even know each other by sight. In this difficulty,

Siadoux bethought himself of inquiring privately at Toulouse, in the hope

of discovering some scandalous passages in Cantegrel's early life, which

might fatally degrade him in the estimation of the widow Mirailhe. The

investigation, as usual in such cases, produced rumours and reports in

plenty, the greater part of which dated back to a period of the butcher's

life when he had resided in the ancient town of Narbonne. One of these

rumours, especially, was of so serious a nature, that Siadoux determined

to test the truth or falsehood of it, personally, by travelling to

Narbonne. He kept his intention a secret not only from his sister and his

daughters, but also from his sons; they were young men, not over-patient

in their tempers--and he doubted their discretion. Thus, nobody knew his

real purpose but himself, when he left home.

His safe arrival at Narbonne was notified in a letter to his family.

The letter entered into no particulars relating to his secret errand:

it merely informed his children of the day when they might expect him

back, and of certain social arrangements which he wished to be made to

welcome him on his return. He proposed, on his way home, to stay two days

at Castelnaudry, for the purpose of paying a visit to an old friend who

was settled there. According to this plan, his return to Croix-Daurade

would be deferred until Tuesday, the twenty-sixth of April, when his

family might expect to see him about sunset, in good time for supper.

He further desired that a little party of friends might be invited to

the meal, to celebrate the twenty-sixth of April (which was a feast-day

in the village), as well as to celebrate his return. The guests whom

he wished to be invited were, first, his sister; secondly, Monsieur

Chaubard, whose pleasant disposition made him a welcome guest at all the

village festivals; thirdly and fourthly, two neighbours, business-men like

himself, with whom he lived on terms of the friendliest intimacy. That

was the party; and the family of Siadoux took especial pains, as the time

approached, to provide a supper worthy of the guests, who had all shown

the heartiest readiness in accepting their invitations.

This was the domestic position, these were the family prospects, on

the morning of the twenty-sixth of April--a memorable day, for years

afterwards, in the village of Croix-Daurade.

II. THE EVENTS OF THE DAY.

Besides the curacy of the village church, good Monsieur Chaubard held some

small ecclesiastical preferment in the cathedral church of St. Stephen

at Toulouse. Early in the forenoon of the twenty-sixth, certain matters

connected with this preferment took him from his village curacy to the

city--a distance which has been already described as not greater than one

French league, or between two and three English miles.

After transacting his business, Monsieur Chaubard parted with his clerical

brethren, who left him by himself in the sacristy (or vestry) of the

church. Before he had quitted the room, in his turn, the beadle entered

it, and inquired for the Abbé de Mariotte, one of the officiating priests

attached to the cathedral.

"The Abbé has just gone out," replied Monsieur Chaubard. "Who wants him?"

"A respectable-looking man," said the beadle. "I thought he seemed to be

in some distress of mind, when he spoke to me."

"Did he mention his business with the Abbé?"

"Yes, sir; he expressed himself as anxious to make his confession

immediately."

"In that case," said Monsieur Chaubard, "I may be of use to him in the

Abbé's absence--for I have authority to act here as confessor. Let us

go into the church, and see if this person feels disposed to accept my

services."

When they went into the church, they found the man walking backwards and

forwards in a restless, disordered manner. His looks were so strikingly

suggestive of some serious mental perturbation, that Monsieur Chaubard

found it no easy matter to preserve his composure, when he first addressed

himself to the stranger.

"I am sorry," he began, "that the Abbé de Mariotte is not here to offer

you his services----"

"I want to make my confession," said the man, looking about him vacantly,

as if the priest's words had not attracted his attention.

"You can do so at once, if you please," said Monsieur Chaubard. "I am

attached to this church, and I possess the necessary authority to receive

confessions in it. Perhaps, however, you are personally acquainted with

the Abbé de Mariotte? Perhaps you would prefer waiting----"

"No!" said the man, roughly. "I would as soon, or sooner, confess to a

stranger."

"In that case," replied Monsieur Chaubard, "be so good as to follow me."

He led the way to the confessional. The beadle, whose curiosity was

excited, waited a little, and looked after them. In a few minutes, he

saw the curtains, which were sometimes used to conceal the face of the

officiating priest, suddenly drawn. The penitent knelt with his back

turned to the church. There was literally nothing to see--but the beadle

waited nevertheless, in expectation of the end.

After a long lapse of time, the curtain was withdrawn, and priest and

penitent left the confessional.

The change which the interval had worked in Monsieur Chaubard was so

extraordinary, that the beadle's attention was altogether withdrawn, in

the interest of observing it, from the man who had made the confession. He

did not remark by which door the stranger left the church--his eyes were

fixed on Monsieur Chaubard. The priest's naturally ruddy face was as white

as if he had just risen from a long sickness--he looked straight before

him, with a stare of terror--and he left the church as hurriedly as if he

had been a man escaping from prison; left it without a parting word, or

a farewell look, although he was noted for his courtesy to his inferiors

on all ordinary occasions.

"Good Monsieur Chaubard has heard more than he bargained for," said the

beadle, wandering back to the empty confessional, with an interest which

he had never felt in it till that moment.

* * * * *

The day wore on as quietly as usual in the village of Croix-Daurade. At

the appointed time, the supper-table was laid for the guests in the house

of Saturnin Siadoux. The widow Mirailhe, and the two neighbours, arrived a

little before sunset. Monsieur Chaubard, who was usually punctual, did not

make his appearance with them; and when the daughters of Saturnin Siadoux

looked out from the upper windows, they saw no signs on the high road of

their father's return.

Sunset came--and still neither Siadoux nor the priest appeared. The little

party sat waiting round the table, and waited in vain. Before long, a

message was sent up from the kitchen, representing that the supper must

be eaten forthwith, or be spoilt; and the company began to debate the two

alternatives, of waiting, or not waiting, any longer.

"It is my belief," said the widow Mirailhe, "that my brother is not coming

home to-night. When Monsieur Chaubard joins us, we had better sit down to

supper."

"Can any accident have happened to my father?" asked one of the two

daughters, anxiously.

"God forbid!" said the widow.

"God forbid!" repeated the two neighbours, looking expectantly at the

empty supper-table.

"It has been a wretched day for travelling," said Louis, the eldest son.

"It rained in torrents, all yesterday," added Thomas, the second son.

"And your father's rheumatism makes him averse to travelling in wet

weather," suggested the widow, thoughtfully.

"Very true!" said the first of the two neighbours, shaking his head

piteously at his passive knife and fork.

Another message came up from the kitchen, and peremptorily forbade the

company to wait any longer.

"But where is Monsieur Chaubard?" said the widow. "Has he been taking a

journey too? Why is _he_ absent? Has anybody seen him to-day?"

"I have seen him to-day," said the youngest son, who had not spoken yet.

This young man's name was Jean; he was little given to talking, but he

had proved himself, on various domestic occasions, to be the quickest and

most observant member of the family.

"Where did you see him?" asked the widow.

"I met him, this morning, on his way into Toulouse."

"He has not fallen ill, I hope? Did he look out of sorts when you met him?"

"He was in excellent health and spirits," said Jean. "I never saw him look

better----"

"And _I_ never saw him look worse," said the second of the neighbours,

striking into the conversation with the aggressive fretfulness of a hungry

man.

"What! this morning?" cried Jean, in astonishment.

"No; this afternoon," said the neighbour. "I saw him going into our church

here. He was as white as our plates will be--when they come up. And what

is almost as extraordinary, he passed without taking the slightest notice

of me."

Jean relapsed into his customary silence. It was getting dark; the clouds

had gathered while the company had been talking; and, at the first pause

in the conversation, the rain, falling again in torrents, made itself

drearily audible.

"Dear, dear me!" said the widow. "If it was not raining so hard, we might

send somebody to inquire after good Monsieur Chaubard."

"I'll go and inquire," said Thomas Siadoux. "It's not five minutes'

walk. Have up the supper; I'll take a cloak with me; and if our excellent

Monsieur Chaubard is out of his bed, I'll bring him back, to answer for

himself."

With those words he left the room. The supper was put on the table

forthwith. The hungry neighbour disputed with nobody from that moment,

and the melancholy neighbour recovered his spirits.

On reaching the priest's house, Thomas Siadoux found him sitting alone

in his study. He started to his feet, with every appearance of the most

violent alarm, when the young man entered the room.

"I beg your pardon, sir," said Thomas; "I am afraid I have startled you."

"What do you want?" asked Monsieur Chaubard, in a singularly abrupt,

bewildered manner.

"Have you forgotten, sir, that this is the night of our supper?"

remonstrated Thomas. "My father has not come back; and we can only

suppose----"

At those words the priest dropped into his chair again, and trembled from

head to foot. Amazed to the last degree by this extraordinary reception

of his remonstrance, Thomas Siadoux remembered, at the same time, that he

had engaged to bring Monsieur Chaubard back with him; and, he determined

to finish his civil speech, as if nothing had happened.

"We are all of opinion," he resumed, "that the weather has kept my father

on the road. But that is no reason, sir, why the supper should be wasted,

or why you should not make one of us, as you promised. Here is a good warm

cloak----"

"I can't come," said the priest. "I'm ill; I'm in bad spirits; I'm not

fit to go out." He sighed bitterly, and hid his face in his hands.

"Don't say that, sir," persisted Thomas. "If you are out of spirits, let

us try to cheer you. And you, in your turn, will enliven us. They are all

waiting for you at home. Don't refuse, sir," pleaded the young man, "or

we shall think we have offended you, in some way. You have always been a

good friend to our family----"

Monsieur Chaubard again rose from his chair, with a second change

of manner, as extraordinary and as perplexing as the first. His eyes

moistened as if the tears were rising in them; he took the hand of Thomas

Siadoux, and pressed it long and warmly in his own. There was a curious

mixed expression of pity and fear in the look which he now fixed on the

young man.

"Of all the days in the year," he said, very earnestly, "don't doubt my

friendship to-day. Ill as I am, I will make one of the supper-party, for

your sake----"

"And for my father's sake?" added Thomas, persuasively.

"Let us go to the supper," said the priest.

Thomas Siadoux wrapped the cloak round him, and they left the house.

Every one at the table noticed the change in Monsieur Chaubard. He

accounted for it by declaring, confusedly, that he was suffering

from nervous illness; and then added that he would do his best,

notwithstanding, to promote the social enjoyment of the evening. His talk

was fragmentary, and his cheerfulness was sadly forced; but he contrived,

with these drawbacks, to take his part in the conversation--except in the

case when it happened to turn on the absent master of the house. Whenever

the name of Saturnin Siadoux was mentioned--either by the neighbours,

who politely regretted that he was not present; or by the family, who

naturally talked about the resting-place which he might have chosen

for the night--Monsieur Chaubard either relapsed into blank silence, or

abruptly changed the topic. Under these circumstances, the company, by

whom he was respected and beloved, made the necessary allowances for his

state of health; the only person among them, who showed no desire to cheer

the priest's spirits, and to humour him in his temporary fretfulness,

being the silent younger son of Saturnin Siadoux.

Both Louis and Thomas noticed that, from the moment when Monsieur

Chaubard's manner first betrayed his singular unwillingness to touch on

the subject of their father's absence, Jean fixed his eyes on the priest,

with an expression of suspicious attention; and never looked away from him

for the rest of the evening. The young man's absolute silence at table

did not surprise his brothers, for they were accustomed to his taciturn

habits. But the sullen distrust betrayed in his close observation of the

honoured guest and friend of the family, surprised and angered them. The

priest himself seemed once or twice to be aware of the scrutiny to which

he was subjected, and to feel uneasy and offended, as he naturally might.

He abstained, however, from openly noticing Jean's strange behaviour; and

Louis and Thomas were bound, therefore, in common politeness, to abstain

from noticing it also.

The inhabitants of Croix-Daurade kept early hours. Towards eleven o'clock,

the company rose and separated for the night. Except the two neighbours,

nobody had enjoyed the supper, and even the two neighbours, having eaten

their fill, were as glad to get home as the rest. In the little confusion

of parting, Monsieur Chaubard completed the astonishment of the guests at

the extraordinary change in him, by slipping away alone, without waiting

to bid anybody good night.

The widow Mirailhe and her nieces withdrew to their bed-rooms, and left

the three brothers by themselves in the parlour.

"Jean," said Thomas Siadoux, "I have a word to say to you. You stared

at our good Monsieur Chaubard in a very offensive manner all through the

evening. What did you mean by it?"

"Wait till to-morrow," said Jean; "and perhaps I may tell you."

He lit his candle, and left them. Both the brothers observed that his hand

trembled, and that his manner--never very winning--was, on that night,

more serious and more unsociable than usual.

III. THE YOUNGER BROTHER.

When post-time came on the morning of the twenty-seventh, no letter

arrived from Saturnin Siadoux. On consideration, the family interpreted

this circumstance in a favourable light. If the master of the house had

not written to them, it followed, surely, that he meant to make writing

unnecessary by returning on that day.

As the hours passed, the widow and her nieces looked out, from time to

time, for the absent man. Towards noon, they observed a little assembly

of people approaching the village. Ere long, on a nearer view, they

recognised at the head of the assembly, the chief magistrate of Toulouse,

in his official dress. He was accompanied by his Assessor (also in

official dress), by an escort of archers, and by certain subordinates

attached to the town-hall. These last appeared to be carrying some burden,

which was hidden from view by the escort of archers. The procession

stopped at the house of Saturnin Siadoux; and the two daughters, hastening

to the door, to discover what had happened, met the burden which the men

were carrying, and saw, stretched on a litter, the dead body of their

father.

The corpse had been found that morning on the banks of the river Lers.

It was stabbed in eleven places with knife or dagger wounds. None of the

valuables about the dead man's person had been touched; his watch and his

money were still in his pockets. Whoever had murdered him, had murdered

him for vengeance, not for gain.

Some time elapsed before even the male members of the family were

sufficiently composed to hear what the officers of justice had to say to

them. When this result had been at length achieved, and when the necessary

inquiries had been made, no information of any kind was obtained which

pointed to the murderer, in the eye of the law. After expressing his

sympathy, and promising that every available means should be tried to

effect the discovery of the criminal, the chief magistrate gave his orders

to his escort, and withdrew.

When night came, the sister and the daughters of the murdered man retired

to the upper part of the house, exhausted by the violence of their grief.

The three brothers were left once more alone in the parlour, to speak

together of the awful calamity which had befallen them. They were of hot

Southern blood, and they looked on one another with a Southern thirst for

vengeance in their tearless eyes.

The silent younger son was now the first to open his lips.

"You charged me yesterday," he said to his brother Thomas, "with looking

strangely at Monsieur Chaubard all the evening; and I answered that I

might tell you _why_ I looked at him when to-morrow came. To-morrow has

come, and I am ready to tell you."

He waited a little, and lowered his voice to a whisper when he spoke again.

"When Monsieur Chaubard was at our supper-table last night," he said, "I

had it in my mind that something had happened to our father, and that the

priest knew it."

The two elder brothers looked at him in speechless astonishment.

"Our father has been brought back to us a murdered man!" Jean went on,

still in a whisper. "I tell you, Louis--and you, Thomas--that the priest

knows who murdered him."

Louis and Thomas shrank from their younger brother, as if he had spoken

blasphemy.

"Listen," said Jean. "No clue has been found to the secret of the murder.

The magistrate has promised us to do his best--but I saw in his face that

he had little hope. We must make the discovery ourselves--or our father's

blood will have cried to us for vengeance, and cried in vain. Remember

that--and mark my next words. You heard me say yesterday evening, that

I had met Monsieur Chaubard on his way to Toulouse in excellent health

and spirits. You heard our old friend and neighbour contradict me at the

supper-table, and declare that he had seen the priest, some hours later,

go into our church here with the face of a panic-stricken man. You saw,

Thomas, how he behaved when you went to fetch him to our house. You saw,

Louis, what his looks were like when he came in. The change was noticed by

everybody--what was the cause of it? _I_ saw the cause in the priest's own

face, when our father's name turned up in the talk round the supper-table.

Did Monsieur Chaubard join in that talk? He was the only person present

who never joined in it once. Did he change it, on a sudden, whenever

it came his way? It came his way four times; and four times he changed

it--trembling, stammering, turning whiter and whiter, but still, as true

as the Heaven above us, shifting the talk off himself, every time! Are

you men? Have you brains in your heads? Don't you see, as I see, what

this leads to? On my salvation I swear it--the priest knows the hand that

killed our father!"

The faces of the two elder brothers darkened vindictively, as the

conviction of the truth fastened itself on their minds.

"_How_ could he know it?" they inquired, eagerly.

"He must tell us himself," said Jean.

"And if he hesitates--if he refuses to open his lips?"

"We must open them by main force."

They drew their chairs together after that last answer, and consulted,

for some time, in whispers.

When the consultation was over, the brothers rose and went into the room

where the dead body of their father was laid out. The three kissed him, in

turn, on the forehead--then took hands together, and looked, meaningly,

in each other's faces--then separated. Louis and Thomas put on their

hats, and went at once to the priest's residence; while Jean withdrew by

himself to the great room at the back of the house, which was used for

the purposes of the oil-factory.

Only one of the workmen was left in the place. He was watching an immense

cauldron of boiling linseed-oil.

"You can go home," said Jean, patting the man kindly on the shoulder.

"There is no hope of a night's rest for me, after the affliction that

has befallen us--I will take your place at the cauldron. Go home, my good

fellow--go home."

The man thanked him, and withdrew. Jean followed, and satisfied himself

that the workman had really left the house. He then returned, and sat down

by the boiling cauldron.

Meanwhile, Louis and Thomas presented themselves at the priest's house.

He had not yet retired to bed, and he received them kindly--but with

the same extraordinary agitation in his face and manner which had

surprised all who saw him on the previous day. The brothers were prepared

beforehand with an answer, when he inquired what they wanted of him. They

replied immediately that the shock of their father's horrible death had

so seriously affected their aunt and their eldest sister, that it was

feared the minds of both might give way, unless spiritual consolation and

assistance were afforded to them that night. The unhappy priest--always

faithful and self-sacrificing where the duties of his ministry were in

question--at once rose to accompany the young men back to the house. He

even put on his surplice, and took the crucifix with him, to impress his

words of comfort all the more solemnly on the afflicted women whom he was

called on to succour.

Thus innocent of all suspicion of the conspiracy to which he had fallen a

victim, he was taken into the room where Jean sat waiting by the cauldron

of oil; and the door was locked behind him.

Before he could speak, Thomas Siadoux openly avowed the truth.

"It is we three who want you," he said--"not our aunt, and not our sister.

If you answer our questions truly, you have nothing to fear. If you

refuse----" He stopped, and looked toward Jean and the boiling cauldron.

Never, at the best of times, a resolute man; deprived, since the day

before, of such resources of energy as he possessed, by the mental

suffering which he had undergone in secret--the unfortunate priest

trembled from head to foot, as the three brothers closed round him. Louis

took the crucifix from him, and held it; Thomas forced him to place his

right hand on it; Jean stood in front of him and put the questions.

"Our father has been brought home a murdered man," he said. "Do you know

who killed him?"

The priest hesitated; and the two elder brothers moved him nearer to the

cauldron.

"Answer us, on peril of your life," said Jean. "Say, with your hand on

the blessed crucifix, do you know the man who killed our father?"

"I do know him."

"When did you make the discovery?"

"Yesterday."

"Where?"

"At Toulouse."

"Name the murderer."

At those words, the priest closed his hand fast on the crucifix, and

rallied his sinking courage.

"Never!" he said firmly. "The knowledge I possess was obtained in the

confessional. The secrets of the confessional are sacred. If I betray

them, I commit sacrilege. I will die first!"

"Think!" said Jean. "If you keep silence, you screen the murderer. If you

keep silence, you are the murderer's accomplice. We have sworn over our

father's dead body to avenge him--if you refuse to speak, we will avenge

him on _you_. I charge you again, name the man who killed him."

"I will die first," the priest reiterated, as firmly as before.

"Die then!" said Jean. "Die in that cauldron of boiling oil."

"Give him time," cried Louis and Thomas, earnestly pleading together.

"We will give him time," said the younger brother. "There is the clock

yonder, against the wall. We will count five minutes by it. In those five

minutes, let him make his peace with God--or make up his mind to speak."

They waited, watching the clock. In that dreadful interval, the priest

dropped on his knees and hid his face. The time passed in dead silence.

"Speak! for your own sake, for our sakes, speak!" said Thomas Siadoux, as

the minute hand reached the point at which the five minutes expired.

The priest looked up--his voice died away on his lips--the mortal agony

broke out on his face in great drops of sweat--his head sank forward on

his breast.

"Lift him!" cried Jean, seizing the priest on one side. "Lift him, and

throw him in!"

The two elder brothers advanced a step--and hesitated.

"Lift him, on your oath over our father's body!"

The two brothers seized him on the other side. As they lifted him to a

level with the cauldron, the horror of the death that threatened him,

burst from the lips of the miserable man in a scream of terror. The

brothers held him firm at the cauldron's edge. "Name the man!" they said

for the last time.

The priest's teeth chattered--he was speechless. But he made a sign with

his head--a sign in the affirmative. They placed him in a chair, and

waited patiently until he was able to speak.

His first words were words of entreaty. He begged Thomas Siadoux to give

him back the crucifix. When it was placed in his possession, he kissed

it, and said faintly, "I ask pardon of God for the sin that I am about to

commit." He paused; and then looked up at the younger brother, who still

stood in front of him. "I am ready," he said. "Question me, and I will

answer."

Jean repeated the questions which he had put, when the priest was first

brought into the room.

"You know the murderer of our father?"

"I know him."

"Since when?"

"Since he made his confession to me yesterday, in the cathedral of

Toulouse."

"Name him."

"His name is Cantegrel."

"The man who wanted to marry our aunt?"

"The same."

"What brought him to the confessional?"

"His own remorse."

"What were the motives for his crime?"

"There were reports against his character; and he discovered that your

father had gone privately to Narbonne to make sure that they were true."

"Did our father make sure of their truth?"

"He did."

"Would those discoveries have separated our aunt from Cantegrel if our

father had lived to tell her of them?"

"They would. If your father had lived, he would have told your aunt that

Cantegrel was married already; that he had deserted his wife at Narbonne;

that she was living there with another man, under another name; and that

she had herself confessed it in your father's presence."

"Where was the murder committed?"

"Between Villefranche and this village. Cantegrel had followed your father

to Narbonne; and had followed him back again to Villefranche. As far as

that place, he travelled in company with others, both going and returning.

Beyond Villefranche, he was left alone at the ford over the river. There

Cantegrel drew the knife to kill him, before he reached home and told his

news to your aunt."

"How was the murder committed?"

"It was committed while your father was watering his pony by the bank of

the stream. Cantegrel stole on him from behind, and struck him as he was

stooping over the saddle-bow."

"This is the truth, on your oath?"

"On my oath, it is the truth."

"You may leave us."

* * * * *

The priest rose from his chair without assistance. From the time when

the terror of death had forced him to reveal the murderer's name, a great

change had passed over him. He had given his answers with the immoveable

calmness of a man on whose mind all human interests had lost their hold.

He now left the room, strangely absorbed in himself; moving with the

mechanical regularity of a sleep-walker; lost to all perception of things

and persons about him. At the door he stopped--woke, as it seemed, from

the trance that possessed him--and looked at the three brothers with a

steady changeless sorrow, which they had never seen in him before, which

they never afterwards forgot.

"I forgive you," he said, quietly and solemnly. "Pray for me, when my time

comes."

With those last words, he left them.

IV. THE END.

The night was far advanced; but the three brothers determined to set forth

instantly for Toulouse, and to place their information in the magistrate's

hands, before the morning dawned.

Thus far, no suspicion had occurred to them of the terrible consequences

which were to follow their night-interview with the priest. They were

absolutely ignorant of the punishment to which a man in holy orders

exposed himself, if he revealed the secrets of the confessional. No

infliction of that punishment had been known in their neighbourhood--for,

at that time, as at this, the rarest of all priestly offences was a

violation of the sacred trust confided to the confessor by the Roman

Church. Conscious that they had forced the priest into the commission of

a clerical offence, the brothers sincerely believed that the loss of his

curacy would be the heaviest penalty which the law could exact from him.

They entered Toulouse that night, discussing the atonement which they

might offer to Monsieur Chaubard, and the means which they might best

employ to make his future life easy to him.

The first disclosure of the consequences which would certainly follow

the outrage they had committed, was revealed to them when they made their

deposition before the officer of justice. The magistrate listened to their

narrative with horror vividly expressed in his face and manner.

"Better you had never been born," he said, "than have avenged your

father's death, as you three have avenged it. Your own act has doomed the

guilty and the innocent to suffer alike."

Those words proved prophetic of the truth. The end came quickly, as the

priest had foreseen it, when he spoke his parting words.

* * * * *

The arrest of Cantegrel was accomplished without difficulty, the next

morning. In the absence of any other evidence on which to justify this

proceeding, the private disclosure to the authorities of the secret which

the priest had violated, became inevitable. The Parliament of Languedoc

was, under these circumstances, the tribunal appealed to; and the decision

of that assembly immediately ordered the priest and the three brothers

to be placed in confinement, as well as the murderer Cantegrel. Evidence

was then immediately sought for, which might convict this last criminal,

without any reference to the revelation that had been forced from the

priest--and evidence enough was found to satisfy judges whose minds

already possessed the foregone certainty of the prisoner's guilt. He was

put on his trial, was convicted of the murder, and was condemned to be

broken on the wheel. The sentence was rigidly executed, with as little

delay as the law would permit.

The cases of Monsieur Chaubard, and of the three sons of Siadoux, next

occupied the judges. The three brothers were found guilty of having forced

the secret of a confession from a man in holy orders, and were sentenced

to death by hanging. A far more terrible expiation of his offence awaited

the unfortunate priest. He was condemned to have his limbs broken on the

wheel, and to be afterwards, while still living, bound to the stake, and

destroyed by fire.

Barbarous as the punishments of that period were, accustomed as the

population was to hear of their infliction, and even to witness it, the

sentences pronounced in these two cases dismayed the public mind; and the

authorities were surprised by receiving petitions for mercy from Toulouse,

and from all the surrounding neighbourhood. But the priest's doom had been

sealed. All that could be obtained, by the intercession of persons of

the highest distinction, was, that the executioner should grant him the

mercy of death, before his body was committed to the flames. With this

one modification, the sentence was executed, as the sentence had been

pronounced, on the curate of Croix-Daurade.

The punishment of the three sons of Siadoux remained to be inflicted. But

the people, roused by the death of the ill-fated priest, rose against this

third execution, with a resolution before which the local government gave

way. The cause of the young men was taken up by the hot-blooded populace,

as the cause of all fathers and all sons; their filial piety was exalted

to the skies; their youth was pleaded in their behalf; their ignorance

of the terrible responsibility which they had confronted in forcing the

secret from the priest, was loudly alleged in their favour. More than

this, the authorities were actually warned that the appearance of the

prisoners on the scaffold would be the signal for an organised revolt and

rescue. Under this serious pressure, the execution was deferred, and the

prisoners were kept in confinement until the popular ferment had subsided.

The delay not only saved their lives, it gave them back their liberty

as well. The infection of the popular sympathy had penetrated through

the prison doors. All three brothers were handsome, well-grown young

men. The gentlest of the three in disposition--Thomas Siadoux--aroused

the interest and won the affection of the head-gaoler's daughter. Her

father was prevailed on at her intercession to relax a little in his

customary vigilance; and the rest was accomplished by the girl herself.

One morning, the population of Toulouse heard, with every testimony of

the most extravagant rejoicing, that the three brothers had escaped,

accompanied by the gaoler's daughter. As a necessary legal formality, they

were pursued, but no extraordinary efforts were used to overtake them:

and they succeeded, accordingly, in crossing the nearest frontier.

Twenty days later, orders were received from the capital, to execute

their sentence in effigy. They were then permitted to return to France,

on condition that they never again appeared in their native place, or in

any other part of the province of Languedoc. With this reservation they

were left free to live where they pleased, and to repent the fatal act

which had avenged them on the murderer of their father at the cost of the

priest's life.

Beyond this point the official documents do not enable us to follow their

career. All that is now known has been now told of the village-tragedy at

Croix-Daurade.

BOLD WORDS BY A BACHELOR.

The postman's knocks at my door have been latterly more frequent than

usual; and out of the increased number of letters left for me, it has

happened that an unusually large proportion have contained wedding cards.

Just as there seem to be certain days when all the beautiful women in

London take to going out together, certain days when all the people we

know appear to be conspiring to meet us at every turn in one afternoon's

walk--so there seem to be times and seasons when all our friends are

inexplicably bent on getting married together. Capricious in everything,

the law of chances is especially whimsical, according to my experience,

in its influence over the solemnisation of matrimony. Six months ago,

there was no need for me to leave a single complimentary card anywhere,

for weeks and weeks together. Just at the present time, I find myself

in danger of wearing out my card-case by incessant use. My friends are

marrying recklessly in all sorts of opposite directions, and are making

the bells a greater nuisance than usual in every parish of London.

These curious circumstances have set me thinking on the subject of

marriage, and have recalled to my mind certain reflections in connection

with that important change in life, which I first made when I was not

quite such an incurably-settled old bachelor as I am at the present

moment.

It occurred to me, at that past time, and it occurs to me still, that

while great stress is laid in ordinary books and ordinary talk on the

personal interest which a man has himself, and on the family interest

which his near relations have also, in his marrying an affectionate

and sensible woman, sufficient importance has not been attached to the

interest of another sort, which the tried and worthy friends of his

bachelor days ought to feel, and, for the most part, do feel, in his

getting a good wife. It really and truly depends upon her, in more cases

than I should like to enumerate, whether her husband's friendships are

to be continued, after his marriage, in all their integrity, or are

only to be maintained as a mere social form. It is hardly necessary for

me to repeat--but I will do so, in order to avoid the slightest chance

of misconstruction--that I am here speaking only of the worthiest, the

truest, the longest-tried friends of a man's bachelor days. Towards these

every sensible married woman feels, as I believe, that she owes a duty for

her husband's sake. But, unfortunately, there are such female phenomena

in the world as fond wives and devoted mothers, who are anything rather

than sensible women the moment they are required to step out of the sphere

of their conjugal and maternal instincts. Women of this sort have an

unreasonable jealousy of their husbands in small things; and on the misuse

of their influence to serve the interests of that jealousy, lies but too

often the responsibility of severing such friendships as no man can hope

to form for the second time in the course of his life. By the severing

of friendships, I do not mean the breaking off of all intercourse, but

the fatal changing of the terms on which a man lives with his friend--the

casting of the first slight shadow which alters the look of the whole

prospect. It is astonishing by what a multitude of slight threads the firm

continuity of brotherly regard is maintained. Many a woman has snapped

asunder all the finer ligaments which once connected her husband and his

friend; and has thought it enough if she left the two still attached by

the coarser ties which are at the common disposal of all the world. Many a

woman--delicate, affectionate, and kind within her own narrow limits--has

committed that heavy social offence, and has never felt afterwards a

single pang of pity or remorse.

These bold words will be unpopular enough, I am afraid, with certain

readers; but I am an old bachelor, and I must have licence to speak the

unwelcome truth. I respect and admire a good husband and father, but I

cannot shake off the equally sincere reverence that I feel for a good

friend; and I must be allowed to tell some married ladies--what Society

ought to tell them a little oftener--that there are other affections, in

this world, which are noble and honourable, besides those of conjugal and

parental origin. It may be an assertion of a very shocking and unexpected

kind, but I must nevertheless be excused for saying, that some of the

best wives and mothers in the land have given the heart-ache to some of

the best friends. While they have been behaving like patterns of conjugal

propriety, they have been estranging men who would once have gone to the

world's end to serve each other. I, as a single man, can say nothing of

the dreadful wrench--not the less dreadful because it is inevitable--when

a father and mother lose a daughter, in order that a lover may gain a

wife. But I can speak feelingly of the shock of losing a dear friend, in

order that a bride may gain a devoted husband. Nothing shall ever persuade

me (possibly because I am not married) that there is not a flaw of some

sort in the love for a wife which is made complete, in some people's eyes,

by forced contributions from the love which belongs to a friend. I know

that a man and woman who make a happy marriage have gained the summit of

earthly felicity; but do they never reach that enviable eminence without

having trampled underfoot something venerable, or something tender, by

the way?

Bear with me, indignant wives, if I recall the long-past time when one of

the handsomest women I ever saw, took my dearest friend away from me, and

destroyed, in one short day, the whole pleasant edifice that we two had

been building up together since we were boys at school.

I shall never be as fond of any human being again, as I was of that one

friend, and, until the beautiful woman came between us, I believe there

was nothing in this world that he would not have sacrificed and have

done for me. Even while he was courting, I kept my hold on him. Against

opposition on the part of his bride and her family, he stipulated that

I should be his best man on the wedding-day. The beautiful woman grudged

me my one small corner in his heart, even at that time; but he was true

to me--he persisted--and I was the first to shake hands with him when

he was a married man. I had no suspicion then that I was to lose him

from that moment. I only discovered the truth when I went to pay my

first visit to the bride and bridegroom at their abode in the country.

I found a beautiful house, exquisitely kept from top to bottom; I found

a hearty welcome; I found a good dinner and an airy bed-room; I found

a pattern husband and a pattern wife: the one thing I did not find was

my old friend. Something stood up in his clothes, shook hands with me,

pressed wine on me, called me by my Christian name, and inquired what I

was doing in my profession. It was certainly something that had a trick

of looking like my former comrade and brother; something that nobody in

my situation could have complained of with the smallest reason; something

with all the brightness of the old metal about it, but without the

sterling old ring; something, in short, which made me instinctively take

my chamber-candlestick early on the first night of my arrival, and say

good night while the beautiful woman and pattern wife was present to keep

her eye on me.

Can I ever forget the language of that eye on that occasion!--the volumes

it spoke in one glance of cruel triumph! "No more sacred secrets between

you two," it said, brightly. "When you trust him now, you must trust me.

You may sacrifice yourself for your love of him over and over again still,

but he shall make no sacrifices now for you, until he has first found out

how they affect my convenience and my pleasure. Your place in his heart

now, is where I choose it to be. I have stormed the citadel, and I will

bring children by-and-by to keep the ramparts; and you, the faithful old

soldier of former years--you have got your discharge, and may sit and sun

yourself as well as you can at the outer gates. You have been his truest

friend, but he has another now, and need trouble you no longer, except in

the capacity of witness of his happiness. This, you will observe, is in

the order of nature, and in the recognised fitness of things; and he hopes

you will see it--and so do I. And he trusts you will sleep well under his

(and my) new roof--and so do I. And he wishes you good night--and so do

I!"

Many, many years have passed since I first learned these hard truths;

but I can never forget the pang that it cost me to get them by heart at

a moment's notice. My old friend lives still--that is to say, I have an

intimate acquaintance, who asks me to all his dinners, and who made me

godfather to one of his children; but the brother of my love, who died

to me on the day when I paid him the marriage visit, has never come back

to life since that time. On the altar at which we two once sacrificed,

the ashes lie cold. A model husband and father has risen from them, and

that result is, I suppose, the only one that any third person has a right

to expect. It may be so; but, to this day, I cannot help thinking that

the beautiful woman would have done better if she could have made a fond

husband, without at the same time marring a good friend.

Readers will, I am afraid, not be wanting, who will be inclined to tell

me that the lady to whom I have been referring, only asserted the fair

privilege that was hers by right of marriage; and that my sense of injury

springs from the touchy selfishness of an old bachelor. Without attempting

to defend myself, I may at least be allowed to inquire into the lady's

motive for using her privilege--or, in plainer terms, for altering the

relations in which my friend and I had stood towards one another since

boyhood.

Her idea, I presume to have been, that, if I preserved my old footing

with her husband, I should be taking away some part of his affection that

belonged to her. According to my idea of it, she was taking away something

which had belonged to me, and which no effort on her part could afterwards

convert to her own use. It is hard to make some women understand that a

husband's heart--let him be ever so devoted and affectionate--has vacant

places in it which they can never hope to fill. It is a house in which

they and their children, naturally and properly, occupy all the largest

apartments and supply all the prettiest furniture; but there are spare

rooms which they cannot enter, which are reserved all through the lease

of life for inevitable guests of some sort from the world outside. It is

better to let in the old friend than some of the substituted visitors, who

are sure, sooner or later, to enter where there are rooms ready for them,

by means of pass-keys obtained without the permission of the permanent

tenants. Am I wrong in making such assertions as these? I should be

willing enough to think it probable--being only a bachelor--if my views

were based on mere theory. But my opinions, such as they are, have been

formed with the help of proofs and facts. I have met with bright examples

of wives who have strengthened their husbands' friendships as they never

could have been strengthened except under the influence of a woman's

care, employed in the truest, the tenderest, the most delicate way. I

have seen men rescued from the bad habits of half a lifetime by the luck

of keeping faithful friends who were the husbands of sensible wives. It

is a very trite and true remark that the deadliest enmities between men

have been occasioned by women. It is not less certain--though it is a

far less widely-accepted truth--that some (I wish I could say many) of

the strongest friendships have been knit most closely by women's helping

hands.

The real fact seems to be, that the general idea of the scope and purpose

of the Institution of Marriage is a miserably narrow one. The same

senseless prejudice which leads some people, when driven to extremes, to

the practical confession (though it may not be made in plain words) that

they would rather see murder committed under their own eyes, than approve

of any project for obtaining a law of divorce which shall be equal in its

operation on husbands and wives of all ranks who cannot live together,

is answerable also for the mischievous error in principle of narrowing

the practice of the social virtues, in married people, to themselves and

their children. A man loves his wife--which is, in other words, loving

himself--and loves his offspring, which is equivalent to saying that he

has the natural instincts of humanity; and, when he has gone thus far,

he has asserted himself as a model of all the virtues of life, in the

estimation of some people. In my estimation, he has only begun with the

best virtues, and has others yet to practise before he can approach to the

standard of a socially complete man. Can there be a lower idea of Marriage

than the idea which makes it, in fact, an institution for the development

of selfishness on a large and respectable scale? If I am not justified in

using the word selfishness, tell me what character a good husband presents

(viewed plainly as a man) when he goes out into the world, leaving all

his sympathies in his wife's boudoir, and all his affections up-stairs

in the nursery, and giving to his friends such shreds and patches of

formal recognition, in place of true love and regard, as consist in asking

them to an occasional dinner-party, and granting them the privilege of

presenting his children with silver mugs? He is a model of a husband, the

ladies will say. I dare not contradict them; but I should like to know

whether he is also a model of a friend?

No. Bachelor as I am, I have a higher idea of Marriage than this. The

social advantages which it is fitted to produce ought to extend beyond

one man and one woman, to the circle of society amid which they move.

The light of its beauty must not be shut up within the four walls which

enclose the parents and the family, but must flow out into the world, and

shine upon the childless and the solitary, because it has warmth enough

and to spare, and because it may make them, even in their way, happy too.

I began these few lines by asking sympathy and attention for the interest

which a man's true friends have, when he marries, in his choosing a wife

who will let them be friends still, who will even help them to mingling in

closer brotherhood, if help they need. I lay down the pen, suggesting to

some ladies--affectionately suggesting, if they will let me use the word,

after some of the bold things I have said--that it is in their power to

deprive the bachelor of the sole claim he has left to social recognition

and preeminence, by making married men what many of them are, and what

more might be--the best and truest friends that are to be found in the

world.

SOCIAL GRIEVANCES.--V.

MRS. BULLWINKLE.

Ladies and gentlemen. Give me five minutes' sympathy and attention. I have

something serious to say to you.

I am a married man, with an income which is too miserably limited to be

worth mentioning. About a month since, my wife advanced me one step nearer

to the Court for the Relief of Insolvent Debtors, by presenting me with

another child. On five previous occasions, her name had appeared in the

List of British Mothers which adorns the daily Supplement of the Times

newspaper. At each of these trying periods (I speak entirely of myself

when I use the word "trying") she was attended by the same Monthly Nurse.

On this last, and sixth, occasion, we were not so fortunate as to secure

the services of our regular functionary. She was already engaged; and a

new Nurse, with excellent recommendations, was, therefore, employed in

her stead. When I first heard of her, and was told that her name was Mrs.

Bullwinkle, I laughed. It was then the beginning of the month. It is now

the end of it, and I write down that once comical name with a settled

gravity which nothing can disturb.

We all know Mrs. Gamp. My late Monthly Nurse is the exact antipodes of

her. Mrs. Bullwinkle is tall and dignified; her complexion is fair; her

Grecian nose is innocent of all convivial colouring; her figure is not

more than agreeably plump; her manners are icily composed; her dress is

quiet and neat; her age cannot be more than five-and-thirty; her style

of conversation, when she talks, is flowing and grammatical--upon the

whole, she appears to be a woman who is much too ladylike for her station

in life. When I first met Mrs. Bullwinkle on the stairs, I felt inclined

to apologise for my wife's presumption in engaging her services. Though I

checked this absurd impulse, I could not resist answering the new nurse's

magnificent curtsy by expressing a polite hope that she would find her

situation everything that she could wish, under my roof.

"I am not accustomed to exact much, sir," said Mrs. Bullwinkle. "The cook

seems, I am rejoiced to say, to be an intelligent and attentive person.

I have been giving her some little hints on the subject of my meals. I

have ventured to tell her, that I eat little and often; and I think she

thoroughly understands me."

I am ashamed to say I was not so sharp as the cook. I did not thoroughly

understand Mrs. Bullwinkle, until it became my duty, through my wife's

inability to manage our domestic business, to settle the weekly bills. I

then became sensible of an alarming increase in our household expenditure.

If I had given two dinner-parties in the course of the week, the bills

could not have been more exorbitant: the butcher, the baker, and the

grocer could not have taken me at a heavier pecuniary disadvantage. My

heart sank as I thought of my miserable income. I looked up piteously from

the bills to the cook for an explanation.

The cook looked back at me compassionately, shook her head, and said:

"Mrs. Bullwinkle."

I reckoned up additional joints, additional chops, additional steaks,

fillets, kidneys, gravy beef. I told off a terrible supplement to the

usual family consumption of bread, flour, tea, sugar, and alcoholic

liquids. I appealed to the cook again; and again the cook shook her head,

and said, "Mrs. Bullwinkle."

My miserable income obliges me to look after sixpences, as other men look

after five-pound notes. Ruin sat immovable on the pile of weekly bills,

and stared me sternly in the face. I went up into my wife's room. The new

nurse was not there. The unhappy partner of my pecuniary embarrassments

was reading a novel. My innocent infant was smiling in his sleep. I had

taken the bills with me. Ruin followed them up-stairs, and sat spectral

on one side of the bed, while I sat on the other.

"Don't be alarmed, love," I said, "if you hear the police in the house.

Mrs. Bullwinkle has a large family, and feeds them all out of our

provisions. A search shall be instituted, and slumbering Justice shall be

aroused. Look at these joints, these chops, these steaks, these fillets,

these kidneys, these gravy beefs!"

My wife shook her head, exactly as the cook had shaken hers; and answered,

precisely as the cook had answered, "Mrs. Bullwinkle."

"But where does she hide it all?" I exclaimed.

My wife shut her eyes, and shuddered.

"John!" she said, "I have privately consulted the doctor; and the doctor

says Mrs. Bullwinkle is a Cow."

"If the doctor had to pay these bills," I retorted savagely, "he would

not be quite so free with his jokes."

"He is in earnest, dear. He explained to me, what I never knew before,

that a Cow is an animal with many stomachs----"

"What!" I cried out, in amazement; "do you mean to tell me that all these

joints, these chops, these steaks, these fillets, these kidneys, these

gravy beefs--these loaves, these muffins, these mixed biscuits--these

teas, these sugars, these brandies, gins, sherries, and beers, have

disappeared in one week, down Mrs. Bullwinkle's throat?"

"All, John," said my wife, sinking back on the pillow with a groan.

It was impossible to look at the bills and believe it. I questioned

and cross-questioned my wife, and still elicited nothing but the one

bewildering answer, "All, John." Determined--for I am a man of a logical

and judicial mind--to have this extraordinary and alarming case properly

investigated, I took out my pocket-book and pencil, and asked my wife if

she felt strong enough to make a few private entries for my satisfaction.

Finding that she willingly accepted the responsibility, I directed her

to take down, from her own personal investigation, a statement of Mrs.

Bullwinkle's meals, and of the time at which she partook of each of them,

for twenty-four hours, beginning with one morning and ending with another.

After making this arrangement, I descended to the parlour, and took

the necessary business measures for using the cook as a check upon her

mistress. Having carefully instructed her to enter, on the kitchen slate,

everything that was sent up to Mrs. Bullwinkle, for twenty-four hours, I

felt that my machinery for investigating the truth was now complete. If

the statement of the mistress, in bed on the second floor, agreed with the

statement of the cook, in the distant sphere of the kitchen, there could

be no doubt that I had obtained reliable information on the mysterious

subject of Mrs. Bullwinkle's meals.

In due time, the two reports were sent in, and I had an opportunity of

understanding at last, what "eating little and often" really meant, in the

case of my wife's monthly nurse. Except in one particular, to be hereafter

adverted to, both statements agreed exactly. Here is the List, accompanied

by a correct time-table, of Mrs. Bullwinkle's meals, beginning with the

morning of Monday and ending with the morning of Tuesday. I certify, on my

honour as a British husband and housekeeper, that the copy is correctly

taken from my wife's entries in my pocket-book, checked impartially by

the cook's slate:[E]

A.M.

7. Breakfast.--Tea, Toast, Half-quartern Loaf, Butter, Eggs, Bacon.

9.30. First Morning Snack.--A glass of pale Sherry, and a plate of

Mixed Biscuits.

11. Second Morning Snack.--A Basin of Beef Tea, and a tumbler of

Brandy and Water.

P.M.

12.45. Dinner.--A Roast Loin of Mutton and Mashed Potatoes. With

Dinner, Ale, spiced and warmed. After Dinner, a tumbler of Hot Gin and

Water.

P.M.

3. Afternoon Snack.--A glass of pale Sherry, and a plate of Mixed

Biscuits.

4.30. Tea and Muffins.

7. Evening Snack.--Stewed Cheese, Toast, and a tumbler of Brandy and

Water.

9. Supper.--Nice juicy Steak, and two glasses of Beer. Second

Course.--Stewed Cheese, and a tumbler of Gin and Water.

ADDITIONAL PARTICULARS. (Not vouched for by the cook's slate.)--During

the night of Monday Mrs. Bullwinkle partook, at intervals, of Caudle.

At 4.30 A.M., on the morning of Tuesday, my wife was awakened by

hearing the nurse walking up and down the room, and sighing bitterly.

The following conversation then took place between them:

_My Wife._--Are you ill?

_Mrs. Bullwinkle._--No. Hungry.

I can certify that the above List correctly, and even moderately,

represents Mrs. Bullwinkle's daily bill of fare, for one month. I can

assert, from my own observation, that every dish, at every hour of the

day, which went up to her full, invariably came down from her empty. Mrs.

Bullwinkle was not a wasteful eater. She could fully appreciate, in roast

meat, for example, the great value of "lean;" but she was not, on that

account, insensible to the humbler merits of fat, skin, and "outside."

All--emphatically, all--was fish that came to her net; and the net itself,

as I can personally testify, was never once over-weighted and never out of

order. I have watched, in the case of this perfectly unparalleled human

cormorant, for symptoms of apoplexy, or at least of visible repletion,

with a dreadful and absorbing interest; and have, on no occasion, been

rewarded by making the smallest discovery. Mrs. Bullwinkle was never,

while in my service, even so much as partially intoxicated. Her face was

never flushed; her articulation was never thickened; her brain was never

confused; her movements were never uncertain. After the breakfast, the two

morning snacks, and the dinner,--all occurring within the space of six

hours,--she could move about the room with unimpeded freedom of action;

could keep my wife and the baby in a state of the strictest discipline;

could curtsy magnificently, when the unoffending master, whom she was

eating out of house and home, entered the room, preserving her colour, her

equilibrium, and her staylaces, when she sank down and when she swelled up

again, without the vestige of an apparent effort. During the month of her

devastating residence under my roof, she had two hundred and forty-eight

meals, including the snacks; and she went out of the house no larger and

no redder than she came in. After the statement of one such fact as that,

further comment is superfluous.

I leave this case in the hands of the medical and the married public.

I present it, as a problem, to physiological science. I offer it, as a

warning, to British husbands with limited incomes. While I write these

lines, while I give my married countrymen this friendly caution, my wife

is weeping over the tradesmen's bills; my children are on half-allowance

of food; my cook is worked off her legs; my purse is empty. Young

husbands, and persons about to marry, commit to memory the description

here given of my late monthly nurse! Avoid a tall and dignified woman,

with a flowing style of conversation and impressively ladylike manners!

Beware, my struggling friends, my fellow-toilers along the heavily-taxed

highways of domestic happiness--beware of Mrs. Bullwinkle!

FOOTNOTES:

[A] The curious legend connected with the birth of this "Adopted

Son," and the facts relating to his extraordinary career in after

life, are derived from the "Records" of the French Police of the

period. In this instance, and in the instances of those other

papers in the present collection which deal with foreign incidents

and characters, while the facts of each narrative exist in print,

the form in which the narrative is cast is of my own devising. If

these facts had been readily accessible to readers in general, the

papers in question would not have been reprinted. But the scarce

and curious books from which my materials are derived, have been

long since out of print, and are, in all human probability, never

likely to be published again.

[B] The biographical facts mentioned in this little sketch, are

derived from Mr. Blanchard Jerrold's interesting narrative of his

father's Life and Labours. For the rest--that is to say, for the

opinions here expressed on Jerrold's works, and for the estimate

attempted of his personal character--I am responsible. This is the

only instance of a reprinted article in the present collection,

any part of which is founded on a modern and an accessible

book. The reader will perhaps excuse and understand my making an

exception here to my own rules, when I add that Douglas Jerrold

was one of the first and the dearest friends of my literary life.

[C] When this article was first published in Household Words,

a son of Mr. Elliston wrote to the conductor to protest against

the epithets which I had attached to his father's name. In the

present reprint I have removed the epithets; not because I think

them undeserved, but because they merely represented my own angry

sense of Mr. Elliston's treatment of Jerrold--a sense which I have

no wish needlessly to gratify at the expense of a son's regard

for his father's memory. But the facts of the case as they were

originally related, and as I heard them from Jerrold himself,

remain untouched--exactly as my own opinion of Mr. Elliston's

conduct remains to this day unaltered. If the "impartial" reader

wishes to have more facts to decide on than those given in the

text, he is referred to Raymond's Life of Elliston--in which work

he will find the clear profits put into the manager's pocket by

Black-Eyed Susan, estimated at one hundred and fifty pounds a

week.

[D] This paper, and the paper on Art entitled 'To Think, or Be

Thought For,' which immediately follows it, provoked, at the time

of their first appearance, some remonstrance both of the public

and the private sort. I was blamed--so far as I could understand

the objections--for letting out the truth about the Drama, and

for speaking my mind (instead of keeping it to myself, as other

people did) on the subject of the Old Masters. Finding, however,

that my positions remained practically unrefuted, and that my

views were largely shared by readers with no professional interest

in theatres, and no vested critical rights in old pictures--and

knowing, besides, that I had not written without some previous

inquiry and consideration--I held steadily to my own convictions;

and I hold to them still. These articles are now reprinted (as

they were originally produced) to serve two objects which I

persist in thinking of some importance:--Freedom of inquiry into

the debased condition of the English Theatre; and freedom of

thought on the subject of the Fine Arts.

[E] This time-table is no invention of mine. It is accurately

copied from an "original document" sent to me by the victim of a

monthly nurse.

THE END.

LONDON: PRINTED BY W. CLOWES AND SONS, STAMFORD STREET,

AND CHARING CROSS.

End of Project Gutenberg's My Miscellanies, Vol. 2 (of 2), by Wilkie Collins

My Miscellanies, Vol. 2 (of 2) · 第 6 / 6 章