Section I. Summary of ENGLISH MEDIÆVAL ARCHITECTURE (1050–1550). By

Transcriber’s Note: Italic text is enclosed in _underscores_; boldface

text is enclosed in =equals signs=.

Transcriber included the plate numbers in their captions.

SELECTED ETCHINGS BY PIRANESI

SERIES I.

[Illustration]

Selected Etchings

by

PIRANESI

With an Introduction

by

C. H. REILLY, M.A., F.R.I.B.A.,

Roscoe Professor of Architecture, The University of Liverpool.

SERIES I.

TECHNICAL JOURNALS, LTD.

CAXTON HOUSE :: WESTMINSTER

LIST OF PLATES

1. Title-page to the “Vedute di Roma.” (_Pub. Rome 1751._)

2. Composition of Ruins.

3. Bas-relief from the Portico of the Church of the Apostles, Rome.

4. Antique bas-relief from Naples.

5. Trophy of Arms.

DESIGNS.

6. Design for a Grand Staircase.

7. Design for a Sculpture Gallery.

8. Design for the Mausoleum of a Roman Emperor.

9. Sketch Design.

10. Composition.

VIEWS OF ROMAN BUILDINGS.

11. Pyramid of C. Cestius, Appian Way.

12. Temple of Hercules, Cora.

13. Basilica of Maxentius, Rome.

14. The Capitol, Rome.

15. The Capitol, Rome.

16. The Colosseum and the Arch of Constantine, Rome.

17. The Colosseum.

18. Tomb of Hadrian (Castle of St. Angelo).

19. Ponte Molle, Rome.

20. The Temple of Vesta at Tivoli.

21. Interior of the Pantheon.

22. Gallery in Hadrian’s Villa, Tivoli.

23. Ponte St. Angelo.

24. Temple of Concord, Rome.

25. Interior of Santa Maria Maggiore, Rome.

26. Piazza Navona, Rome.

27. View of the Churches of the Madonna di Loreto and Santa Maria,

by Trajan’s Column, Rome.

28. Piazza of St. Peter’s, Rome.

29. Antique Equestrian statues (Castor and Pollux) on the Quirinal,

Rome.

30. The Quirinal, Rome.

IMAGINARY ROMAN PRISONS.

31. Etching from the series of imaginary Roman Prisons.

32. Ditto.

VASES, TRIPODS, &C.

33. Vase from “Vasi Candelabri.” (_Pub. Rome 1778._)

34. Vase from ditto.

35. Vase from ditto.

36. Vase from ditto.

37. Vase and tripod from ditto.

38. Vase and pedestal from ditto.

39. Tripod from “Vasi Candelabri.”

40. Tripod and bas-relief from ditto.

41. Tripod from ditto.

42. Lamp from ditto.

43. Vases from ditto.

44. Altar from ditto.

CHIMNEYPIECES.

45. Design for Chimneypiece from “Diverse Maniere.”

46. Ditto.

47. Ditto.

48. Ditto.

49. Ditto.

50. Design for a Chimneypiece and clock from “Diverse Maniere.”

INTRODUCTION

Architecturally speaking, we live at a time somewhat similar to that

in which the genius of Piranesi first made its impact upon English

designers. In the latter half of the eighteenth century English

architects and patrons were alike growing a little tired of pure

Palladianism. The novelty and spirit of Inigo Jones’s work had given

place to the uninspired correctness of Campbell, Kent, and a host

of lesser disciples. Restrained and elegant as the work of those

architects appears to modern eyes, after the debauch of “free Classic”

from which we are now emerging, it is nevertheless true that, at

that time, the English Palladian formula was nearly exhausted. The

circuses and crescents of Bath, with their unfluted columns and dull

ornament, their endless repetitions of correct features, could not be

indefinitely extended. The early Georgian houses, so comfortable in

the country, began to look a little coarse and provincial in London

streets, particularly to those who had taken the Grand Tour.

What more natural, then, that architects should turn again to the

source and fountainhead from which Palladio had drawn his inspiration,

to see whether it had anything fresh to yield?

The practising architect in England at the end of the eighteenth

century required, however, a cicerone to the remains of the antique

world just as much as his predecessor did in the seventeenth century.

The seventeenth-century architect chose Palladio as his guide;

the architect in the latter part of the eighteenth century chose

Piranesi. Naturally, the lesson taught was somewhat different. The

eighteenth-century architect was much further advanced in scholarship.

Palladio gave the main proportions of the Orders and the principles

of composition. He laid down definite rules and precepts suitable

to beginners. His was the first-year work, to use a school simile.

Piranesi takes the scholars of the later years and initiates them

into all the mysteries of ornament and stylistic character. Offering

no pedantic rules, he makes a direct appeal to the imagination of his

students. He reveals to them not only the power but the intimate spirit

of the Roman world. He offers them whole collections of vases and

candelabra to use or not as they like. He unlocks a treasure-house--a

library full of fresh detail. The detail, too, is rich, complex detail,

safe only in the hands of the discerning. But Piranesi’s students in

England at that time were fit to profit by such a master; among his

more attentive scholars being Robert Adam, Chambers, Dance, and many

other architects of the late eighteenth century, and through these he

influenced the decorative designers from Chippendale to Pergolesi. Mr.

Phene Spiers, not without a certain hyperbole, traces the Empire Style

to Piranesi’s designs for chimneypieces. At any rate it is safe to say

that the new vigour and life which came into English architecture with

the work of Chambers and Adam was derived from a more thorough and

complete knowledge of Roman architecture, and that the chief source

of that knowledge was the vast collection of thirteen hundred or more

engraved plates which Piranesi etched and published at the marvellous

rate of one a fortnight throughout a fairly long life.

Now, if any coherence at all can be seen in the trend of modern English

architecture, we seem at the present moment to be just as dissatisfied

with mere Palladianism as were the architects of the end of the

eighteenth century. Like them, too, we are looking for a more complete

expression of the Classic spirit. To us, therefore, Piranesi may have

a very similar lesson. The unfortunate thing, however, is that his

etchings, a few years ago so easy to obtain, are daily becoming more

rare and expensive. A collection of the best of those issued during the

artist’s lifetime could hardly be made to-day for less than a couple of

hundred pounds. The Paris reprints which his son issued in 1815 might

be obtained for half that sum, but to the ordinary practitioner this

may be considered as half infinity. Even Mr. Keith Young’s massive

volume of reproductions costs several pounds. The days of Robert Adam

were the days when architects were few and patrons were rich. Our own

times are less happy in that respect, but they are nevertheless the

days of unrivalled opportunity. Piranesi is the magician who can show

what opportunities may become; more especially as the process block,

albeit lacking in the marvellous gradations of tone and feeling of the

original etchings, renders it possible to publish at small cost such a

series as are comprised in this volume.

The following are the main facts of Piranesi’s career as far as they

are known:--

Giovanni Battista Piranesi, to give him his full name, was born in

Venice in the year 1720. His father Angelo pursued the honourable

calling of a stonemason, so suited to the progenitor of an architect.

His mother was sister to an engineer and architect named Lucchesi, and

it was to him that young Piranesi was articled. In his early years he

seems to have been something of an _enfant prodigue_ and is reported to

have been able to draw the architecture of Venice at the age of eight.

At eighteen he persuaded his parents to send him to Rome, and ever

after, although signing himself “Venetian Architect,” he remained at

work in that city. At first, in his desire to obtain a firm grasp on

the technique of the graphic arts, he seems to have attached himself

to various masters. The story is told that he threatened one of these

masters, Vasi, with the loss of his life because he imagined that some

secret in the process of etching was being withheld from him. Such a

story, whether true or not, together with the later one that he saw

for the first time and married his wife within the space of one week,

fits in well enough with the impetuous temperament and fine fury of

work which all the etchings exhibit. The numerous controversies in

which he was engaged in later years, sometimes involving the erasure of

names from dedication and title-pages, are all evidence of the same

characteristics--characteristics which may have made him, according to

modern standards, a poor archæologist, but which were not without value

to the artist and teacher of artists.

In 1741, when twenty-one years of age, Piranesi published his first

etchings, four compositions of ruins, afterwards included in his _Opere

Varie_, issued by Bouchard at Rome in 1750. In 1748 he published his

_Antichità Romane de’ Tempi della Repubblica e de’ primi Imperatori,

etc._, containing thirty plates of triumphal arches, amphitheatres,

and other ancient structures, mostly from places other than Rome. The

price of this volume (Mr. Samuel informs us in his admirable book) was

16 paoli, or about 13s. 4d., which shows for how small a contemporary

reward Piranesi had to work. In 1750 Bouchard published his _Opere

Varie_, which contained a number of his imaginative designs for great

halls, staircases and monuments, as well as his famous series of prison

dreams--the _Carceri d’Invenzione_. From this time onwards followed

in quick succession an immense number of etchings grouped somewhat

irregularly in great folio volumes with varying engraved title-pages.

The _Raccolta di Varie Vedute_ (Rome 1751) contains ninety-three small

views and includes work by Israel Silvestre and other etchers. This

volume must not be confused with the _Vedute di Roma_, in two volumes,

containing large title-pages and one hundred and thirty-seven plates,

thirty-four of which were published in 1751, under the title _Le

Magnificenze di Roma le più remarcabili_.

Perhaps Piranesi’s greatest work, in both size and importance, is _Le

Antichità Romane_, in four volumes, containing a varying number of

plates from 216–224. This was first issued in 1756.

In 1761, he etched four plates for Robert Adam illustrating the

latter’s design for Sion House, and in 1769 he published his _Diverse

Maniere d’Adornare_, in which appear the ornate but very stimulating

designs for chimneypieces, referred to above. Of his remaining works,

perhaps the most important to architects is the _Vasi Candelabri Cippi

Sarcofagi Tripodi Lucerne ed ornamenti Antichi_, to give it its full

title, which was published in Rome in 1778--the year of his death. This

contains a series of magnificent drawings of antiques, largely from

his own collection. A great number of these drawings are dedicated

to various English gentlemen, each described as “a lover of the fine

arts,” which is proof of the interest Englishmen were already taking in

Piranesi and his work.

In addition to the foregoing, Piranesi published a number of monographs

on special subjects illustrated with etchings. Among these are the

volumes on Trajan’s Column, the Theatre at Herculaneum, Hadrian’s

Villa, and the Temples at Pæstum, all of which are more noticeable for

the boldness of the draughtsmanship than for the archæological views

they set forth. It must not be imagined, however, because Piranesi was

the interpreter of the romance of the Roman ruins, and through this

very romance fired the imagination of Europe, that he was not when he

liked an exact draughtsman. The cracks on the obelisk shown in the

foreground of his etching of Santa Maria Maggiore tally with those

shown in a photograph taken one hundred and fifty years later.

In April, 1757, Piranesi was elected an honorary Fellow of the Society

of Antiquaries, which is another proof of the esteem in which he was

held in England. He was knighted by Pope Clement XIII. in 1767. He died

in 1778, and is buried in the church of Santa Maria Aventina.

Of his five children, Francesco (b. 1748) and Laura (b. 1750) etched

in their father’s manner and assisted him in his work. After his

death, however, they took to print-selling rather than creative work,

though Francesco still etched plates on his own account. In 1798 he

packed up his father’s copper-plates and took them to Paris. During an

adventurous journey they fell into the hands of an English Admiral,

who, however, knowing the fame of the father, unfortunately restrained

his first impulse to throw the plates overboard. It was unfortunate

because on arrival in Paris Francesco was able, with the help of the

French Government, to republish from the old plates a new edition of

his father’s work, which, from the state of the plates, for many years

did considerable damage to Piranesi’s fame as an etcher. The plates

exist at the present day, and it is believed that prints are still

occasionally struck from them. Now, however, the difference between the

original Roman impressions and the later Paris ones is well understood,

and Piranesi’s renown never stood higher than it does to-day. His son

died in 1810.

The plates here reproduced are from the author’s collection, with the

exception of the designs for chimneypieces, which have been kindly lent

by Mr. Batsford.

C. H. REILLY.

[Illustration: Plate 1:

Title-page to the “Vedute di Roma.” (Pub. Rome 1751.)]

[Illustration: Plate 2:

Composition of Ruins.]

[Illustration: Plate 3:

Bas-relief from the Portico of the Church of the

Apostles, Rome.]

[Illustration: Plate 4:

Antique bas-relief from Naples.]

[Illustration: Plate 5:

Trophy of Arms.]

[Illustration: Plate 6:

Design for a Grand Staircase.]

[Illustration: Plate 7:

Design for a Sculpture Gallery.]

[Illustration: Plate 8:

Design for the Mausoleum of a Roman Emperor.]

[Illustration: Plate 9:

Sketch Design.]

[Illustration: Plate 10:

Composition.]

[Illustration: Plate 11:

Pyramid of C. Cestius, Appian Way.]

[Illustration: Plate 12:

Temple of Hercules, Cora.]

[Illustration: Plate 13:

Basilica of Maxentius, Rome.]

[Illustration: Plate 14:

The Capitol, Rome.]

[Illustration: Plate 15:

The Capitol.]

[Illustration: Plate 16:

The Colosseum and the Arch of Constantine, Rome.]

[Illustration: Plate 17:

The Colosseum.]

[Illustration: Plate 18:

Tomb of Hadrian (Castle of St. Angelo).]

[Illustration: Plate 19:

Ponte Molle, Rome.]

[Illustration: Plate 20:

The Temple of Vesta at Tivoli.]

[Illustration: Plate 21:

Interior of the Pantheon.]

[Illustration: Plate 22:

Gallery in Hadrian’s Villa, Tivoli.]

[Illustration: Plate 23:

Ponte St. Angelo.]

[Illustration: Plate 24:

Temple of Concord, Rome.]

[Illustration: Plate 25:

Interior of Santa Maria Maggiore, Rome.]

[Illustration: Plate 26:

Piazza Navona, Rome.]

[Illustration: Plate 27:

View of the Churches of the Madonna di Loreto and Santa

Maria, by Trajan’s Column, Rome.]

[Illustration: Plate 28:

Piazza of St. Peter’s, Rome.]

[Illustration: Plate 29:

Antique Equestrian Statues (Castor and Pollux) on the

Quirinal, Rome.]

[Illustration: Plate 30:

The Quirinal, Rome.]

[Illustration: Plate 31:

Etching from the Series of Imaginary Roman Prisons.]

[Illustration: Plate 32:

Etching from the Series of Imaginary Roman Prisons.]

[Illustration: Plate 33:

Vase from the “Vasi Candelabri.”]

[Illustration: Plate 34:

Vase from the “Vasi Candelabri.”]

[Illustration: Plate 35:

Vase from the “Vasi Candelabri.”]

[Illustration: Plate 36:

Vase from the “Vasi Candelabri.”]

[Illustration: Plate 37:

Vase and Tripod from the “Vasi Candelabri.”]

[Illustration: Plate 38:

Vase and Pedestal from the “Vasi Candelabri.”]

[Illustration: Plate 39:

Tripod from the “Vasi Candelabri.”]

[Illustration: Plate 40:

Tripod and bas-relief from the “Vasi Candelabri etc.”]

[Illustration: Plate 41:

Tripod from the “Vasi Candelabri.”]

[Illustration: Plate 42:

Lamp from the “Vasi Candelabri.”]

[Illustration: Plate 43:

Vases from the “Vasi Candelabri.”]

[Illustration: Plate 44:

Altar from the “Vasi Candelabri.”]

[Illustration: Plate 45:

Design for Chimneypiece and Grate from the “Diverse

Maniere.”]

[Illustration: Plate 46:

Design for Chimneypiece from the “Diverse Maniere.”]

[Illustration: Plate 47:

Design for Chimneypiece from the “Diverse Maniere.”]

[Illustration: Plate 48:

Design for Chimneypiece from the “Diverse Maniere.”]

[Illustration: Plate 49:

Design for Chimneypiece from the “Diverse Maniere.”]

[Illustration: Plate 50:

Design for Chimneypiece and Clock from the “Diverse

Maniere.”]

SOME INTERESTING PUBLICATIONS

ISSUED BY TECHNICAL JOURNALS, LTD.

CAXTON HOUSE, WESTMINSTER, LONDON

TECHNICAL JOURNALS, LTD.

_Publishers’ Note._

In presenting this list the Publishers would draw attention to the

distinctive character of the works which are described. These cover a

wide field, being of interest not only to those who are professionally

concerned with architecture and building, but also to those who have

a general non-technical interest in such subjects. Thus, the volume

giving an illustrated historical survey of Mediæval and Renaissance

architecture in England, and the volumes dealing with English domestic

and ecclesiastical architecture, garden city houses, and domestic

interior details, appeal alike to the educated layman and to the

architect in practice.

“THE PRACTICAL EXEMPLAR OF ARCHITECTURE” and “STANDARD DETAILS,”

though also of strictly professional interest, are of totally

different character, giving, as they do, carefully measured drawings

and photographs of some of the finest examples of architecture in the

kingdom; while those who are specially concerned with architectural

education from the standpoint of design will find in “THE LIVERPOOL

SKETCH BOOK” a notable collection of students’ drawings.

“WHO’S WHO IN ARCHITECTURE” should be warmly welcomed as a work

occupying a mid-position between the biography and the directory.

As its name implies, it gives biographical particulars of all the

leading men in the profession, and furnishes as well a complete list of

architects in practice.

In addition, particulars are given of “THE ARCHITECTS’ AND BUILDERS’

JOURNAL”--the most up-to-date, the best illustrated, and most widely

read of the architectural and building weeklies--and “THE ARCHITECTURAL

REVIEW,” which, in its new form, has achieved the distinction of

being the finest of all current publications devoted to the art of

architecture.

_A Short Chronological History of British Architecture._

The greatest achievements of British architecture are presented as a

_coup d’œil_ in this attractive volume. Thus, in Section I. we survey

the work of the cathedral builders; in Section II. notable examples

of the Early Renaissance, in Section III. the great buildings of the

Later Renaissance, and a few examples that carry us into the nineteenth

century; the survey concluding with a fine series of illustrations of

work by Sir Aston Webb, Mr. Ernest Newton, Mr. Mervyn Macartney, and

other eminent architects of the present day.

The letterpress accompanying the illustrations is written by

acknowledged authorities, and sets forth in brief order the entire

chronological development, following the succeeding phases of

architectural art, and supplying those essential facts which are

necessary to a proper estimate of the whole.

CONTENTS:

Section I. Summary of ENGLISH MEDIÆVAL ARCHITECTURE (1050–1550). By

EDWARD S. PRIOR, M.A., F.S.A., F.R.I.B.A.

Selected etchings by Piranesi, series 1. · 第 1 / 5 章