CHAPTER II.

THE EVOLUTION OF GRAVESTONES.

Although there may be no expectation of discovering the germ of

the pictorial or allegorical gravestone, a section of the samples

collected for this essay may be displayed to shew the earlier forms

in which the ruder class of masons prepared their sculptured monuments

for the churchyard. There is little doubt that the practice originated

in an endeavour to imitate on the common gravestone the nobler

memorials of the churches and cathedrals, the effort being more or

less successful in proportion to the individual skill of the artist.

The influence of locality, however, must always be a factor in this

consideration; for, as a rule, it will be found that the poorest

examples come from essentially secluded places, while localities of

earlier enlightenment furnish really admirable work of much prior

date. Take, for instance, that most frequent emblem, the skull. I have

not sought for the model by which the village sculptor worked, but

I have in my note-book this sketch of a skull, copied from a

sixteenth-century tomb at Frankfort on the Maine, and there are

doubtless a vast number equal to it in English cathedrals and churches

of the same period.

FIG. 9.--AT FRANKFORT, GERMANY.

Regarding this as our ideal, the primitive work which we find in rural

localities must be pronounced degenerated art. Generally speaking we

may assume that the carver of the stately tomb within the church had

no hand in the execution of the outer gravestone; but that quite early

there were able masons employed upon the decoration of the churchyard

headstone is shewn in many instances, of which the one presented in

Fig. 10 may serve as a very early specimen.

FIG. 10.--AT EAST WICKHAM.

"To Eliza and Lydia, the two wives of Anthony

Neighbours, died 18th Nov. 1675 and 11th

March 1702."

The dates are remarkable in connection with such an elaborate work.

East Wickham is little more than a village even now, and this carving

is very creditable in comparison with other attempts of the same

early period; but the high road from London to Dover runs through the

parish, and may have carried early cultivation into the district. All

the rougher illustrations which I have found have been in remote and

isolated spots, or spots that were remote and isolated when the stones

were set up. The first of these which I discovered was in the little

churchyard of Ridley in Kent, "far from the haunts of men."

FIG. 11.--AT RIDLEY.

"To the three sons of Will. Deane, died 1704,

1707, and 1709, aged 2 weeks, 2 years,

and 5 years."

It is difficult to believe that the face here delineated was meant

to represent a skull, and yet, judging by the many equally and more

absurd figures which I have since met with, there is little doubt that

a skull was intended by the engraver, for this and all others of the

class are incised, simply scratched or cut into the stone; nothing so

poor in drawing have I ever found which has risen to the eminence of

relief. It may, of course, be also surmised that the face here cut

into the stone is meant for a portrait or to represent an angelic

being. The radial lines may have been intended for a halo of glory or

a frilled cap, but, as will be seen by comparison, the whole thing is

easily to be classed with the skull series.

[Illustration: FIG. 9. FRANKFORT.]

[Illustration: FIG. 10. EAST WICKHAM.]

It will be noticed that we have in this instance a form of headstone

differing materially from those of later times, and wherever we find

the rude _incised_ figure we nearly always have the stone of this

shape. Such homely memorials are distinguished in nearly every

instance by dwarfishness and clumsiness. They are seldom more than

2 feet in height, and are often found to measure from 5 inches to 7

inches in thickness. A prolific field for them is the great marshland

forming the Hundred of Hoo, below Gravesend, the scene of many

incidents in the tale by Charles Dickens of "Great Expectations." It

is called by the natives "the Dickens country," for the great author

dwelt on the hilly verge of it and knew it well. The Frontispiece

shews the general view of one of these old stones at Higham, in the

Hoo district.

FRONTISPIECE.--AT HIGHAM.

"To Philip Hawes, died June 24, 1733, aged

19 years."

In this case the top space is occupied, not by a head or skull, but by

two hearts meeting at their points--a not unusual illustration.

At Hoo is one of the coarsest exemplifications of masonic incompetency

I have ever encountered.

FIG. 12.--AT HOO, NEAR ROCHESTER

"To Robert Scott, Yeoman, died 24 Dec. 1677,

aged 70 years."

The nimbus or nightcap again appears as in the Ridley specimen, but,

whatever it be, the teeth are undoubtedly the teeth of the skeleton

head.

This stone has another claim to our notice beyond the inartistic

design. It marks one of the very rare efforts in this direction of the

seventeenth century.

The prevalent shape of these old memorials and their almost

contemporary dates seem to indicate a fashion of the period, but they

are met with in other places of various conformations. There is one

at Erith almost square-headed, only 2 feet high, 1 foot 6 inches wide,

and 7 inches thick.

FIG. 13.--AT ERITH.

It may be noted that this also is of the seventeenth century, and the

mode of describing John Green's age is, I think, unique.

High Halstow is a neighbour of Hoo, and has only of late been

penetrated by the railway to Port Victoria.

From High Halstow we have another curious and almost heathenish

specimen, in which we see the crossbones as an addition to the

"skull," if "skull" it can be considered, with its eyes, eyebrows, and

"cheeks."

[Illustration: FIG. 11. RIDLEY.]

[Illustration: FIG. 12. HOO.]

[Illustration: FIG. 13. ERITH.]

[Illustration: FIG. 14. HIGH HALSTOW.]

[Illustration: FIG. 15. FRINDSBURY.]

[Illustration: FIG. 16. HIGHAM.]

FIG. 14.--AT HIGH HALSTOW.

"To Susan Barber." The date is buried, but

there is a similar stone close by dated

1699.

Nearer Rochester, at Frindsbury, there is the next illustration, still

like a mask rather than a death's head, but making its purpose clear

by the two bones, such as are nearly always employed in more recent

productions.

FIG. 15.--AT FRINDSBURY.

"To William David Jones, died 1721."

There is, however, another at Higham of about the same date, in which,

supposing a skull to be intended, the inspiration of the bones appears

not to have caught the artist. The portrait theory may possibly better

fit this case.

FIG. 16.--AT HIGHAM.

"To Mr Wm Boghurst, died 5th of April 1720,

aged 65."

That some of the carvings were meant for portraits cannot be denied,

and, in order to shew them with unimpeachable accuracy, I have taken

rubbings off a few and present an untouched photograph of them just as

I rubbed them off the stones (Fig. 17). The whole of the originals are

to be found in the neighbouring churchyards of Shorne and Chalk,

two rural parishes on the Rochester Road, and exhibit with all the

fidelity possible the craftsmanship of the village sculptors. They

will doubtless also excite some speculation as to their meaning.

My belief, as already expressed, is that the uppermost four are the

embodiment of the rustic yearning for the ideal; in other words,

attempts to represent the emblem of death--the skull. Nos. 1 and 2 are

from Shorne; Nos. 3, 4, and 5 from the churchyard at Chalk.

In No. 1 we have, perhaps, the crudest conception extant of the

skeleton head. The lower bars are probably meant for teeth; what the

radial lines on the crown are supposed to be is again conjecture.

Perhaps a nimbus, perhaps hair or a cap, or merely an ornamental

finish. The inscription states that the stone was erected to the

memory of "Thomas Vdall," who died in 1704, aged 63 years.

No. 2 has the inscription buried, but it is of about the same date,

judging by its general appearance. The strange feature in this case

is the zig-zag "toothing" which is employed to represent the jaws.

Doubtless the artist thought that anything he might have lost in

accuracy he regained in the picturesque.

No. 3, in which part of the inscription "Here lyeth" intrudes into the

arch belonging by right to the illustration, is equally primitive and

artless. The eyebrows, cheeks--in fact all the features--are evidently

unassisted studies from the living, not the dead, frontispiece of

humanity; but what are the serifs, or projections, on either side?

Wondrous as it is, there can be only one answer. They must be meant

for _ears_! This curious effigy commemorates Mary, wife of William

Greenhill, who died in 1717, aged 47 years.

No. 4 is one of the rude efforts to imitate the skull and crossbones

of which we find many examples. It is dedicated to one Grinhill

(probably a kinsman of the Greenhills aforesaid), who died in 1720,

aged 56 years.

Most strange of all is No. 5, in which the mason leaps to the real

from the emblematic, and gives us something which is evidently meant

for a portrait of the departed. The stone records that Mary, wife of

Thomas Jackson, died in 1730, aged 43 years. It is one of the double

tombstones frequently met with in Kent and some other counties.

The second half, which is headed by a picture of two united hearts,

records that the widower Thomas Jackson followed his spouse in 1748,

aged 55 years.

Upon a stone adjacent, to Mary London, who died in 1731, there has

been another portrait of a lady with braided hair, but time has almost

obliterated it. I mention the circumstance to shew that this

special department of obituary masonry, as all others, was prone

to imitations. I may also remark that intelligent inhabitants and

constant frequenters of these two churchyards have informed me that in

all the hundreds of times of passing these stones they never observed

any of their peculiarities. It ought, however, to be said that these

primitive carvings or scratchings are not often conspicuous, and

generally require some seeking. They are always on a small scale of

drawing, in nearly every instance within the diminished curve of

the most antiquated form of headstone (such as is shewn in the

Frontispiece), and as a rule they are overgrown with lichen, which

has to be rubbed off before the lines are visible. It may safely be

averred, on the other hand, that the majority of the old stones

when found of this shape contain or have contained these remarkable

figures, and in some places, particularly in Kent, they literally

swarm. There is a numerous assortment of them at Meopham, a once

remote hamlet, now a station on the London, Chatham, and Dover

Railway. I have copied only one--an early attempt apparently to

produce a cherub resting with outstretched wings upon a cloud, but

there are a good many of the same order to keep it in countenance.

FIG. 18.--AT MEOPHAM.

"To Sarah Edmeades, died 1728, aged 35 years."

In the churchyards of Hawkhurst, Benenden, Bodiam, Cranbrook,

Goudhurst, and all through the Great Weald these incised stones are

to be discovered by hundreds, very much of one type perhaps, but

displaying nevertheless some extraordinary variations. I know of no

district so fruitful of these examples as the Weald of Kent.

Even when the rude system of cutting into the stone ceased to be

practised and relief carving became general, grossness of idea seems

to have survived in many rural parishes. One specimen is to be seen

in the churchyard of Stanstead in Kent, and is, for relief work,

childish.

FIG. 19.--AT STANSTEAD.

"To William Lock, died 1751, aged 16 years."

However, the vast number of gravestones carved in relief are, on the

whole, creditable, especially if we consider the difficulty which met

the workmen in having to avoid giving to their crossbones and other

ornaments the appearance of horns growing out of their skulls.

[Illustration: FIG. 18. MEOPHAM.]

[Illustration: FIG. 19. STANSTEAD.]

[Illustration: FIG. 20. OLD ROMNEY.]

[Illustration: FIG. 21. CRAYFORD.]

[Illustration: FIG. 22. SHOREHAM.]

[Illustration: FIG. 23. LEWISHAM.]

[Illustration: FIG. 24. HOBNSEY.]

FIG. 20.--AT OLD ROMNEY.

"To William Dowll, died 1710, aged 40 years."

The winged skull probably typifies flight above.

FIG. 21.--AT CRAYFORD.

"To John Farrington, died Dec. 8, 1717, aged

above fourty years."

In the appropriate design from Shoreham the same idea is better

conveyed both by the winged head and by the torch, which when elevated

signifies the rising sun, and when depressed the setting sun. The

trumpet in this case would seem to mean the summons. The two little

coffins are eloquent without words.

FIG. 22.--AT SHOREHAM.

"The children of Thomas and Jane Stringer,

died Sept'r 1754, aged 10 and 7 years."

In Lewisham Churchyard is one of the death's head series almost _sui

generis_.

FIG. 23.--AT LEWISHAM.

"To Richard Evens, died May 18, 1707, aged

67 years."

The chaplet of bay-leaves or laurel doubtless indicates "Victory."

Not only is this an early and well-accomplished effort, but it is

remarkable for the presence of a lower jaw, which is seldom seen on a

gravestone. The skull turned up by the sexton is usually the typical

object, and to that we may presume the nether jaw is not often

attached. It is found, however, on a headstone of a somewhat weak

design in Old Hornsey Churchyard.

FIG. 24.--AT HORNSEY.

"To Mr John Gibson, whipmaker, died Oct.

30, 1766, aged 44 years."

The hand seems to be pointing to the record of a well-spent life which

has won the crown of glory.

There is another of the lower jaw series at Teddington, which is also,

in all probability, the only instance of a man's nightcap figuring in

such gruesome circumstances.

FIG. 25.--AT TEDDINGTON.

"To Sarah Lewis, died June 11, 1766, aged

63 years."

The emblem of Death was quite early crowned with laurel to signify

glory, and associated with foliage and flowers in token of the

Resurrection. One at Finchley is, for its years, well preserved.

FIG. 26.--AT FINCHLEY.

"To Richard Scarlett, died July 23, 1725."

Another at Farnborough is, considering the date, of exceptional merit.

FIG. 27.--AT FARNBOROUGH.

"To Elizabeth Stow, died 1744, aged 75 years."

[Illustration: FIG. 25. TEDDINGTON.]

[Illustration: FIG. 26. FINCHLEY.]

[Illustration: FIG. 27. FARNBOROUGH.]

[Illustration: FIG. 28. CHISELHURST.]

[Illustration: FIG. 29. HARTLEY.]

[Illustration: FIG. 30. WEST WICKHAM.]

[Illustration: FIG. 31. HORNSEY.]

A few others of the skull pattern with various additaments may

conclude this chapter. The cup in the Chiselhurst case is somewhat

uncommon.

FIG. 28.--AT CHISELHURST.

Name obliterated; date Nov. 1786.

The conventional symbols in the next example are clearly to be read.

FIG. 29.--AT HARTLEY.

"To Eliza Andersen, died 1771, aged 70 years."

The West Wickham specimen has its prototype in the old churchyard at

Hackney, and in other places.

FIG. 30.--AT WEST WICKHAM.

"To Richard Whiffen, died 1732, aged

3 years."

In Fig. 31, from Hornsey, the two skulls present the appearance of

having been pitched up from the grave.

FIG. 31.--AT HORNSEY.

"To William Fleetwood, died Jan. 30, 1750,

aged 15 months."

In Search of Gravestones Old and Curious · 第 2 / 14 章