The Master Of Tanagra is certainly one of Ernst von Wildenbruch's most

delightful productions. It presents an exceedingly pretty picture of the

bright external side of ancient Greek life, and tells how a handsome

young Tanagrian left his home for the sake of art, and returned to it for

love's sake--an old story, no doubt, but one which gains a new charm from

its new setting. The historical characters of the book, such as

Praxiteles and Phryne, seem somehow less real than those that are purely

imaginary, but this is usually the case in all novels that would recreate

the past for us, and is a form of penalty that Romance has often to pay

when she tries to blend fact with fancy, and to turn the great personages

of history into puppets for a little play. The translation, which is

from the pen of the Baroness von Lauer, reads very pleasantly, and some

of the illustrations are good, though it is impossible to reproduce by

any process the delicate and exquisite charm of the Tanagra figurines.

M. Paul Stapfer in his book Moliere et Shakespeare shows very clearly

that the French have not yet forgiven Schlegel for having threatened

that, as a reprisal for the atrocities committed by Napoleon, he would

prove that Moliere was no poet. Indeed, M. Stapfer, while admitting that

one should be fair 'envers tout le monde, meme envers les Allemands,'

charges down upon the German critics with the brilliancy and dash of a

French cuirassier, and mocks at them for their dulness, at the very

moment that he is annexing their erudition, an achievement for which the

French genius is justly renowned. As for the relative merits of Moliere

and Shakespeare, M. Stapfer has no hesitation in placing the author of Le

Misanthrope by the side of the author of Hamlet. Shakespeare's comedies

seem to him somewhat wilful and fantastic; he prefers Orgon and Tartuffe

to Oberon and Titania, and can hardly forgive Beatrice for having been

'born to speak all mirth, and no matter.'

Perhaps he hardly realises that it is as a poet, not as a playwright,

that we love Shakespeare in England, and that Ariel singing by the yellow

sands, or fairies hiding in a wood near Athens, may be as real as Alceste

in his wooing of Celimene, and as true as Harpagon weeping for his money-

box; still, his book is full of interesting suggestion, many of his

remarks on literature are quite excellent, and his style has the

qualities of grace, distinction, and ease of movement.

Not so much can be said for Annals of the Life of Shakespeare, which is a

dull though well-meaning little book. What we do not know about

Shakespeare is a most fascinating subject, and one that would fill a

volume, but what we do know about him is so meagre and inadequate that

when it is collected together the result is rather depressing. However,

there are many people, no doubt, who find a great source of interest in

the fact that he author of The Merchant of Venice once brought an action

for the sum of 1 pound, 15s. 10d. and gained his suit, and for these this

volume will have considerable charm. It is a pity that the finest line

Ben Jonson ever wrote about Shakespeare should be misquoted at the very

beginning of the book, and the illustration of Shakespeare's monument

gives the inscription very badly indeed. Also, it was Ben Jonson's

stepfather, not his 'father-in-law,' as stated, who was the bricklayer;

but it is quite useless to dwell upon these things, as nobody nowadays

seems to have any time either to correct proofs or to consult

authorities.

One of the most pleasing volumes that has appeared as yet in the

Canterbury Series is the collection of Allan Ramsay's poems. Ramsay,

whose profession was the making of periwigs, and whose pleasure was the

making of poetry, is always delightful reading, except when he tries to

write English and to imitate Pope. His Gentle Shepherd is a charming

pastoral play, full of humour and romance; his Vision has a good deal of

natural fire; and some of his songs, such as The Yellow-hair'd Laddie and

The Lass of Patie's Mill, might rank beside those of Burns. The preface

to this attractive little edition is from the pen of Mr. J. Logie

Robertson, and the simple, straightforward style in which it is written

contrasts favourably with the silly pompous manner affected by so many of

the other editors of the series.

Ramsay's life is worth telling well, and Mr. Robertson tells it well, and

gives us a really capital picture of Edinburgh society in the early half

of the last century.

Dante for Beginners, by Miss Arabella Shore, is a sort of literary guide-

book. What Virgil was to the great Florentine, Miss Shore would be to

the British public, and her modest little volume can do no possible harm

to Dante, which is more than one can say of many commentaries on the

Divine Comedy.

Miss Phillimore's Studies in Italian Literature is a much more elaborate

work, and displays a good deal of erudition. Indeed, the erudition is

sometimes displayed a little too much, and we should like to see the lead

of learning transmuted more often into the gold of thought. The essays

on Petrarch and Tasso are tedious, but those on Aleardi and Count

Arrivabene are excellent, particularly the former. Aleardi was a poet of

wonderful descriptive power, and though, as he said himself, he

subordinated his love of poetry to his love of country, yet in such

service he found perfect freedom.

The article on Edoardo Fusco also is full of interest, and is a timely

tribute to the memory of one who did so much for the education and

culture of modern Italy. On the whole, the book is well worth reading;

so well worth reading, indeed, that we hope that the foolish remarks on

the Greek Drama will be amended in a second edition, or, which would be

better still, struck out altogether. They show a want of knowledge that

must be the result of years of study.

(1) The Master of Tanagra. Translated from the German of Ernst von

Wildenbruch by the Baroness von Lauer. (H. Grevel and Co.)

(2) Moliere et Shakespeare. By Paul Stapfer. (Hachette.)

(3) Annals of the Life of Shakespeare. (Sampson Low, Marston and Co.)

(4) Poems by Allan Ramsay. Selected and arranged, with a Biographical

Sketch of the Poet, by J. Logie Robertson, M.A. 'Canterbury Poets.'

(Walter Scott.)

(5) Dante for Beginners. By Arabella Shore. (Chapman and Hall.)

(6) Studies in Italian Literature. By Miss Phillimore. (Sampson Low,

Marston and Co.)

A CHEAP EDITION OF A GREAT MAN

(Pall Mall Gazette, April 18, 1887.)

Formerly we used to canonise our great men; nowadays we vulgarise them.

The vulgarisation of Rossetti has been going on for some time past with

really remarkable success, and there seems no probability at present of

the process being discontinued. The grass was hardly green upon the

quiet grave in Birchington churchyard when Mr. Hall Caine and Mr. William

Sharp rushed into print with their Memoirs and Recollections. Then came

the usual mob of magazine-hacks with their various views and attitudes,

and now Mr. Joseph Knight has produced for the edification of the British

public a popular biography of the poet of the Blessed Damozel, the

painter of Dante's Dream.

It is only fair to state that Mr. Knight's work is much better than that

of his predecessors in the same field. His book is, on the whole,

modestly and simply written; whatever its other faults may be, it is at

least free from affectation of any kind; and it makes no serious pretence

at being either exhaustive or definitive. Yet the best we can say of it

is that it is just the sort of biography Guildenstern might have written

of Hamlet. Nor does its unsatisfactory character come merely from the

ludicrous inadequacy of the materials at Mr. Knight's disposal; it is the

whole scheme and method of the book that is radically wrong. Rossetti's

was a great personality, and personalities such as his do not easily

survive shilling primers. Sooner or later they have inevitably to come

down to the level of their biographers, and in the present instance

nothing could be more absolutely commonplace than the picture Mr. Knight

gives us of the wonderful seer and singer whose life he has so recklessly

essayed to write.

No doubt there are many people who will be deeply interested to know that

Rossetti was once chased round his garden by an infuriated zebu he was

trying to exhibit to Mr. Whistler, or that he had a great affection for a

dog called 'Dizzy,' or that 'sloshy' was one of his favourite words of

contempt, or that Mr. Gosse thought him very like Chaucer in appearance,

or that he had 'an absolute disqualification' for whist-playing, or that

he was very fond of quoting the Bab Ballads, or that he once said that if

he could live by writing poetry he would see painting d---d! For our

part, however, we cannot help expressing our regret that such a shallow

and superficial biography as this should ever have been published. It is

but a sorry task to rip the twisted ravel from the worn garment of life

and to turn the grout in a drained cup. Better, after all, that we knew

a painter only through his vision and a poet through his song, than that

the image of a great man should be marred and made mean for us by the

clumsy geniality of good intentions. A true artist, and such Rossetti

undoubtedly was, reveals himself so perfectly in his work, that unless a

biographer has something more valuable to give us than idle anecdotes and

unmeaning tales, his labour is misspent and his industry misdirected.

Bad, however, as is Mr. Knight's treatment of Rossetti's life, his

treatment of Rossetti's poetry is infinitely worse. Considering the

small size of the volume, and the consequently limited number of

extracts, the amount of misquotation is almost incredible, and puts all

recent achievements in this sphere of modern literature completely into

the shade. The fine line in the first canto of Rose Mary:

What glints there like a lance that flees?

appears as:

What glints there like a _glance_ that flees?

which is very painful nonsense; in the description of that graceful and

fanciful sonnet Autumn Idleness, the deer are represented as '_grazing_

from hillock eaves' instead of gazing from hillock-eaves; the opening of

Dantis Tenebrae is rendered quite incomprehensible by the substitution of

'my' for 'thy' in the second line; even such a well-known ballad as

Sister Helen is misquoted, and, indeed, from the Burden of Nineveh, the

Blessed Damozel, the King's Tragedy and Guido Cavalcanti's lovely

ballata, down to the Portrait and such sonnets as Love-sweetness,

Farewell to the Glen, and A Match with the Moon, there is not one single

poem that does not display some careless error or some stupid misprint.

As for Rossetti's elaborate system of punctuation, Mr. Knight pays no

attention to it whatsoever. Indeed, he shows quite a rollicking

indifference to all the secrets and subtleties of style, and inserts or

removes stops in a manner that is absolutely destructive to the lyrical

beauty of the verse. The hyphen, also, so constantly employed by

Rossetti in the case of such expressions as 'hillock-eaves' quoted above,

'hill-fire,' 'birth-hour,' and the like, is almost invariably

disregarded, and by the brilliant omission of a semicolon Mr. Knight has

succeeded in spoiling one of the best stanzas in The Staff and Scrip--a

poem, by the way, that he speaks of as The Staff and the Scrip (sic).

After this tedious comedy of errors it seems almost unnecessary to point

out that the earliest Italian poet is not called Ciullo D'Alcano (sic),

or that The Bothie of Toper-na-Fuosich (sic) is not the title of Clough's

boisterous epic, or that Dante and his Cycle (sic) is not the name

Rossetti gave to his collection of translations; and why Troy Town should

appear in the index as Tory Town is really quite inexplicable, unless it

is intended as a compliment to Mr. Hall Caine who once dedicated, or

rather tried to dedicate, to Rossetti a lecture on the relations of poets

to politics. We are sorry, too, to find an English dramatic critic

misquoting Shakespeare, as we had always been of opinion that this was a

privilege reserved specially for our English actors. We sincerely hope

that there will soon be an end to all biographies of this kind. They rob

life of much of its dignity and its wonder, add to death itself a new

terror, and make one wish that all art were anonymous. Nor could there

have been any more unfortunate choice of a subject for popular treatment

than that to which we owe the memoir that now lies before us. A pillar

of fire to the few who knew him, and of cloud to the many who knew him

not, Dante Gabriel Rossetti lived apart from the gossip and tittle-tattle

of a shallow age. He never trafficked with the merchants for his soul,

nor brought his wares into the market-place for the idle to gape at.

Passionate and romantic though he was, yet there was in his nature

something of high austerity. He loved seclusion, and hated notoriety,

and would have shuddered at the idea that within a few years after his

death he was to make his appearance in a series of popular biographies,

sandwiched between the author of Pickwick and the Great Lexicographer.

One man alone, the friend his verse won for him, did he desire should

write his life, and it is to Mr. Theodore Watts that we, too, must look

to give us the real Rossetti. It may be admitted at once that Mr.

Watts's subject has for the moment been a little spoiled for him. Rude

hands have touched it, and unmusical voices have made it sound almost

common in our ears. Yet none the less is it for him to tell us of the

marvel of this man whose art he has analysed with such exquisite insight,

whose life he knows as no one else can know it, whom he so loyally loved

and tended, and by whom he was so loyally beloved in turn. As for the

others, the scribblers and nibblers of literature, if they indeed

reverence Rossetti's memory, let them pay him the one homage he would

most have valued, the gracious homage of silence. 'Though you can fret

me, yet you cannot play upon me,' says Hamlet to his false friend, and

even so might Rossetti speak to those well-intentioned mediocrities who

would seem to know his stops and would sound him to the top of his

compass. True, they cannot fret him now, for he has passed beyond the

possibility of pain; yet they cannot play upon him either; it is not for

them to pluck out the heart of his mystery.

There is, however, one feature of this book that deserves unstinted

praise. Mr. Anderson's bibliography will be found of immense use by

every student of Rossetti's work and influence. Perhaps Young's very

powerful attack on Pre-Raphaelitism, as expounded by Mr. Ruskin

(Longmans, 1857), might be included, but, in all other respects, it seems

quite complete, and the chronological list of paintings and drawings is

really admirable. When this unfortunate 'Great Writers' Series comes to

an end, Mr. Anderson's bibliographies should be collected together and

published in a separate volume. At present they are in a very second-

rate company indeed.

Life of Dante Gabriel Rossetti. By Joseph Knight. 'Great Writers'

Series. (Walter Scott.)

MR. MORRIS'S ODYSSEY

(Pall Mall Gazette, April 26, 1887.)

Of all our modern poets, Mr. William Morris is the one best qualified by

nature and by art to translate for us the marvellous epic of the

wanderings of Odysseus. For he is our only true story-singer since

Chaucer; if he is a Socialist, he is also a Saga-man; and there was a

time when he was never wearied of telling us strange legends of gods and

men, wonderful tales of chivalry and romance. Master as he is of

decorative and descriptive verse, he has all the Greek's joy in the

visible aspect of things, all the Greek's sense of delicate and

delightful detail, all the Greek's pleasure in beautiful textures and

exquisite materials and imaginative designs; nor can any one have a

keener sympathy with the Homeric admiration for the workers and the

craftsmen in the various arts, from the stainers in white ivory and the

embroiderers in purple and fold, to the weaver sitting by the loom and

the dyer dipping in the vat, the chaser of shield and helmet, the carver

of wood or stone. And to all this is added the true temper of high

romance, the power to make the past as real to us as the present, the

subtle instinct to discern passion, the swift impulse to portray life.

It is no wonder the lovers of Greek literature have so eagerly looked

forward to Mr. Morris's version of the Odyssean epic, and now that the

first volume has appeared, it is not extravagant to say that of all our

English translations this is the most perfect and the most satisfying. In

spite of Coleridge's well-known views on the subject, we have always held

that Chapman's Odyssey is immeasurably inferior to his Iliad, the mere

difference of metre alone being sufficient to set the former in a

secondary place; Pope's Odyssey, with its glittering rhetoric and smart

antithesis, has nothing of the grand manner of the original; Cowper is

dull, and Bryant dreadful, and Worsley too full of Spenserian

prettinesses; while excellent though Messrs. Butcher and Lang's version

undoubtedly is in many respects, still, on the whole, it gives us merely

the facts of the Odyssey without providing anything of its artistic

effect. Avia's translation even, though better than almost all its

predecessors in the same field, is not worthy of taking rank beside Mr.

Morris's, for here we have a true work of art, a rendering not merely of

language into language, but of poetry into poetry, and though the new

spirit added in the transfusion may seem to many rather Norse than Greek,

and, perhaps at times, more boisterous than beautiful, there is yet a

vigour of life in every line, a splendid ardour through each canto, that

stirs the blood while one reads like the sound of a trumpet, and that,

producing a physical as well as a spiritual delight, exults the senses no

less than it exalts the soul. It may be admitted at once that, here and

there, Mr. Morris has missed something of the marvellous dignity of the

Homeric verse, and that, in his desire for rushing and ringing metre, he

has occasionally sacrificed majesty to movement, and made stateliness

give place to speed; but it is really only in such blank verse as

Milton's that this effect of calm and lofty music can be attained, and in

all other respects blank verse is the most inadequate medium for

reproducing the full flow and fervour of the Greek hexameter. One merit,

at any rate, Mr. Morris's version entirely and absolutely possesses. It

is, in no sense of the word, literary; it seems to deal immediately with

life itself, and to take from the reality of things its own form and

colour; it is always direct and simple, and at its best has something of

the 'large utterance of the early gods.'

As for individual passages of beauty, nothing could be better than the

wonderful description of the house of the Phoeacian king, or the whole

telling of the lovely legend of Circe, or the manner in which the pageant

of the pale phantoms in Hades is brought before our eyes. Perhaps the

huge epic humour of the escape from the Cyclops is hardly realised, but

there is always a linguistic difficulty about rendering this fascinating

story into English, and where we are given so much poetry we should not

complain about losing a pun; and the exquisite idyll of the meeting and

parting with the daughter of Alcinous is really delightfully told. How

good, for instance, is this passage taken at random from the Sixth Book:

But therewith unto the handmaids goodly Odysseus spake:

'Stand off I bid you, damsels, while the work in hand I take,

And wash the brine from my shoulders, and sleek them all around.

Since verily now this long while sweet oil they have not found.

But before you nought will I wash me, for shame I have indeed,

Amidst of fair-tressed damsels to be all bare of weed.'

So he spake and aloof they gat them, and thereof they told the may,

But Odysseus with the river from his body washed away

The brine from his back and his shoulders wrought broad and mightily,

And from his head was he wiping the foam of the untilled sea;

But when he had throughly washed him, and the oil about him had shed

He did upon the raiment the gift of the maid unwed.

But Athene, Zeus-begotten, dealt with him in such wise

That bigger yet was his seeming, and mightier to all eyes,

With the hair on his head crisp curling as the bloom of the daffodil.

And as when the silver with gold is o'erlaid by a man of skill,

Yea, a craftsman whom Hephaestus and Pallas Athene have taught

To be master over masters, and lovely work he hath wrought;

So she round his head and his shoulders shed grace abundantly.

It may be objected by some that the line

With the hair on his head crisp curling as the bloom of the daffodil,

is a rather fanciful version of

[Greek text]

and it certainly seems probable that the allusion is to the dark colour

of the hero's hair; still, the point is not one of much importance,

though it may be worth noting that a similar expression occurs in

Ogilby's superbly illustrated translation of the Odyssey, published in

1665, where Charles II.'s Master of the Revels in Ireland gives the

passage thus:

Minerva renders him more tall and fair,

Curling in rings like daffodils his hair.

No anthology, however, can show the true merit of Mr. Morris's

translation, whose real merit does not depend on stray beauties, nor is

revealed by chance selections, but lies in the absolute rightness and

coherence of the whole, in its purity and justice of touch, its freedom

from affectation and commonplace, its harmony of form and matter. It is

sufficient to say that this is a poet's version of a poet, and for such

surely we should be thankful. In these latter days of coarse and vulgar

literature, it is something to have made the great sea-epic of the South

native and natural to our northern isle, something to have shown that our

English speech may be a pipe through which Greek lips can blow, something

to have taught Nausicaa to speak the same language as Perdita.

The Odyssey of Homer. Done into English Verse by William Morris, author

of The Earthly Paradise. In two volumes. Volume I. (Reeves and

Turner.)

For review of Volume II. see Mr. Morris's Completion of the Odyssey, page

215.

A BATCH OF NOVELS

(Pall Mall Gazette, May 2, 1887.)

Of the three great Russian novelists of our time Tourgenieff is by far

the finest artist. He has that spirit of exquisite selection, that

delicate choice of detail, which is the essence of style; his work is

entirely free from any personal intention; and by taking existence at its

most fiery-coloured moments he can distil into a few pages of perfect

prose the moods and passions of many lives.

Reviews · 第 10 / 38 段