CHAPTER I

Produced by Sonya Schermann, Stephen Hutcheson, and the

Online Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net

(This file was produced from images generously made

available by The Internet Archive)

ENGLISH

MEN OF SCIENCE

EDITED BY

J. REYNOLDS GREEN, D.Sc.

JOSEPH PRIESTLEY

_All Rights Reserved_

[Illustration: J Priestley]

JOSEPH PRIESTLEY

BY

T. E. THORPE, F.R.S.

AUTHOR OF

HUMPHRY DAVY, POET AND PHILOSOPHER

ETC., ETC.

PUBLISHED IN LONDON BY

J. M. DENT & CO., AND IN NEW

YORK BY E. P. DUTTON & CO.

1906

PREFACE

In the following account of the life and work of that "hero and type of

the intellectual energy of the eighteenth century"--the "honest

heretic"--Joseph Priestley, I have, to a considerable extent, made the

subject of it tell his own story. After Priestley's death there was

found among his papers a short autobiography, dealing with the main

events of his life up to the time of his settlement in America. This was

subsequently published, with additions and explanatory notes, by his

eldest son. Of this biography I have made full use, considering it, of

course, as the best authority on the matters to which it refers.

For the account of the Warrington Academy, with which institution

Priestley was connected for some years, and which connection profoundly

affected his career, I am mainly indebted to Mr Henry A. Bright's paper

in the _Transactions of the Historic Society of Lancashire and

Cheshire_, 1858-59.

The Yates papers in the possession of the Royal Society have also

afforded me much assistance, and have been freely drawn upon.

I am also indebted to the late Mr Henry Carrington Bolton's collection

for certain letters and for information concerning the Lunar Society of

Birmingham.

For the graphic account of the Birmingham Riots of 1791, when

Priestley's house was wrecked, and his library and laboratory destroyed,

as described by an eye-witness, Miss Martha Russell, I have to express

my obligations to her relative, Dr W. J. Russell, who first made me

acquainted with her narrative. I am also indebted to Dr Russell for a

copy of the print from which has been prepared the illustration showing

the destruction of Priestley's house.

I desire also to acknowledge my indebtedness to Dr Aikin for permission

to publish certain of Priestley's letters to his distinguished

connection, Mrs Barbauld.

I am further under obligations to Lady Priestley, Lady Roscoe and Mr

Sydney Lupton for much useful assistance.

The portrait of Priestley, which forms the frontispiece, has been

reproduced in photogravure from the painting by Artaud, now in Dr

Williams' Theological Library in Gordon Square. I have to thank the

Trustees of the Library for their kindness in allowing the copy to be

made.

T. E. T.

London: _May_ 1906.

CONTENTS

PAGE

Chapter I 1

Birth--Parentage--Home Life--Early Education.

Chapter II 17

Enters the Daventry Academy to be trained for the Ministry--Goes to

Needham Market--His Life, Work and Privations there.

Chapter III 30

Goes to Nantwich--Starts a School--Is appointed a Tutor in the

Warrington Academy--Life at Warrington.

Chapter IV 45

Priestley marries--Is ordained--His Essay on Education--Lectures on

History and General Policy--His Chart of Biography--Becomes a Doctor of

Laws of the University of Edinburgh--His visits to London--Makes the

acquaintance of Dr Price, Canton and Benjamin Franklin--Writes the

_History of Electricity_--Is elected into the Royal Society.

Chapter V 66

Goes to Leeds as minister of the Mill Hill Chapel--Resumes his studies

in Speculative Theology--_The Theological Repository_--Becomes a

Unitarian--Priestley as a controversialist--His Theory and Practice of

Perspective--His literary characteristics--Begins his inquiries on

Pneumatic Chemistry--His invention of soda-water--Receives the Copley

Medal of the Royal Society.

Chapter VI 82

Becomes literary companion to Lord Shelburne--Goes abroad--His visit to

Paris--His scientific work at Calne and in London--Continues his

theological and metaphysical studies--His growing unpopularity--Leaves

Lord Shelburne.

Chapter VII 89

Removes to London--Declines a pension--Renews his acquaintance with

Franklin--Goes to Birmingham--Becomes a member of the Lunar Society.

Chapter VIII 103

Priestley at Birmingham--His theological work there--His love of

literature--His catholicity--His personal characteristics.

Chapter IX 120

The Birmingham riots of 1791.

Chapter X 145

Determines to leave England--His arrival in America--Settles in

Northumberland--His closing days--His death.

Chapter XI 167

Priestley as a man of science--His characteristics as a

philosopher--_Experiments and Observations on Different Kinds of

Air_--His discovery of the influence of vegetation on vitiated

air--Atmospheric air not elementary--His researches on nitric

oxide--Eudiometry--Nitrous oxide--Discovers hydrogen chloride--Prepares

oxygen from nitre (1771)--Isolates ammonia gas--Discovers sulphur

dioxide--Dephlogisticated air (oxygen)--Discovers silicon

fluoride--Intra-diffusion of gases--Respiration--Priestley's opinions of

the value of experimental science in education--Discovers nitrosulphuric

acid--Notes the constancy of composition of the atmosphere--Prepares

chlorine--Sound in "air"--Experiments relating to phlogiston--The

seeming conversion of water into air--Watt and the compound nature of

water--Discovers sulphuretted hydrogen--Priestley's confession of faith

in phlogiston.

Index 225

LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS

Joseph Priestley, from the portrait in Dr Williams' Library by Artaud

(_Photogravure_) _Frontispiece_

Birthplace of Priestley, from a drawing by J. A. Symington after a

photograph _page_ 5

The Pillaging of Priestley's House during the Birmingham Riots _facing

page_ 120

Joseph Priestley

CHAPTER I

Birth--Parentage--Home Life--Early Education

"If," says Mr Frederic Harrison, "we choose one man as a type of the

intellectual energy of the eighteenth century we could hardly find a

better than Joseph Priestley, though his was not the greatest mind of

the century. His versatility, eagerness, activity and humanity; the

immense range of his curiosity in all things, physical, moral or social;

his place in science, in theology, in philosophy and in politics; his

peculiar relation to the Revolution, and the pathetic story of his

unmerited sufferings, may make him the hero of the eighteenth century."

In these few lines Mr Harrison has indicated, in terms sufficiently

precise, the leading features in the character and life-history of one

of the most remarkable men of the eighteenth century. To what extent he

may be regarded as a hero and as a type of the intellectual energy of

that century it is the purpose of the following pages to make clear.

Joseph Priestley was born at Fieldhead, in the parish of Birstall, near

Leeds, on March 13 (Old Style), 1733.[1] He was named after his paternal

grandfather, "an eminent tradesman, as much famed for his heavenly

conduct as his grandson (Joseph) has since been for natural abilities."

"The Priestleys," writes Madame Belloc, the great-granddaughter of the

subject of this memoir, in her charming essay, "Joseph Priestley in

Domestic Life" (_Contemporary Review_, October 1894), "were of an old

Presbyterian stock; one branch of the family acquired wealth and lived

at Whiteways, but his (Joseph's) own immediate ancestors were farmers

and clothiers, people of substance in the yeoman class. We can trace

them accurately as far as the middle of the seventeenth century, when

one Phoebe Priestley, after wrestling with fever in her household, was

herself stricken, and 'lay like a lamb before the Lord' on her

deathbed. Her husband wrote a long and touching account of all she

said and did, that her children might know what manner of mother they

had lost. These people were presumably of the same stock as the

Priestleys of Soylands, who ran back into the Middle Ages.

"The children of the Priestley families were all named after

scriptural characters. They were Josephs, Timothys and Sarahs from one

generation to another. The Bible was stamped into them, and from it

they drew all the inspiration of their lives."

Joseph Priestley the elder was born in 1660, and died on August 2, 1745.

He married Sarah Healey and had by her eight children, five sons and

three daughters, of whom Jonas, the father of Joseph Priestley the

younger, born about 1700, was the seventh child and fourth son. Jonas

Priestley married Mary, a daughter of Joseph Swift, a farmer and

maltster of Shafton, near Wakefield, and had by her six children, four

sons and two daughters, of whom Joseph was the eldest and Timothy the

second; Martha, the elder girl, who died in 1812, married John Crouch,

and was left a widow in poor circumstances in 1786. Another member of

the Priestley family who requires mention for the purpose of this

narrative is Sarah, the sister of Jonas and second daughter of Joseph

Priestley the elder. She was born in 1692 and married John Keighley--"a

man who had distinguished himself for his zeal for religion and for his

public spirit." She was left a widow in 1745. Three years before this

she took her nephew Joseph, the subject of this memoir, to live with

her, and "was fond of him in the extreme." She died in 1764. Her brother

John, Joseph Priestley the younger's uncle, died on February 28, 1786,

aged ninety-two. "He was a remarkable man and of a singularly happy

constitution, both of body and mind."

This happy constitution of body and mind seems indeed to have been a

characteristic of many members of the family, the several branches of

which were remarkably healthy and long-lived.

Priestley says of his father Jonas that he had uniformly better spirits

than any man he ever knew, and by this means was as happy towards the

close of life, when reduced to poverty and dependent upon others, as in

his best days. These facts are not without interest as serving to

account for much that we shall have occasion to note in the character

and temperament of the subject of this biography.

Fieldhead, the house in which he first saw the light, had been occupied

by the family for several generations. It was a small two-storey

building, built of stone and slated with flag, similar in character to

many of the houses still standing in the district, the long, low windows

in the upper storeys betokening that they were formerly occupied by

weavers. It was last lived in by Martha Priestley (Mrs Crouch), but on

the death of her husband in 1786 was abandoned by the family, and,

falling into decay, was pulled down about fifty years ago.

The Priestleys were a simple, sober, honest, God-fearing folk, staunch

Calvinists, and deeply religious. Jonas Priestley was a manufacturer of

"home-spun"--a weaver and cloth dresser--two trades now distinct but

then practised in common--who took his week's work on ass-back, on roads

little better than bridle-paths, to the Sunday market in Leeds. He was

of a class characteristic of the district.

These hand-loom weavers, who lived in the hill country lying to the west

of Leeds, were generally men of small capitals; they often annexed a

small farm to their business, or possessed a field or two on which to

support a horse and cow, and were for the most part blessed with the

comforts without the superfluities of life. During five or six days of

the week they dwelt in their own little village, among trees and fields,

taking no thought of the outside world and contenting themselves with

the homely gossip of their farmstead or hamlet. On market day they came

into the town in shoals, clad in their quaint corduroy breeches,

broad-brimmed hats, and brass-buttoned coats of antique cut, bringing

their produce on pack-horses, to await the visits of the merchants--the

commercial aristocracy of Leeds, then a town of some 16,000 or 17,000

inhabitants--who were the agents through which the outer world received

its supply of Yorkshire woollen goods. They were a shrewd, careful race,

somewhat stolid and slow of speech and not given to great mental

briskness or activity, keenly appreciative of the blessings of liberty

and usually in sympathy with the political party to whom the cause of

liberty was for the moment entrusted; sober, godly souls for the most

part; regular in their attendance at public worship, and upon the whole

preferring the plebeian zeal of the Chapel to the aristocratic repose of

the Church.[2]

[Illustration: BIRTHPLACE OF PRIESTLEY.]

And what a world it was in which they thus serenely dwelt apart.

"It was," writes Madame Belloc, "the time of Louis the Fifteenth in

France and of George the Second in England, and the nephews and nieces

of Charlotte Princess Palatine were still living, and her letters,

whose name is legion, yet lay stored in the cabinets of her

correspondents, full of inexpressible details discussed in most

expressive language. It was the time when Jeanie Deans walked from

Scotland to beg her sister's life of Queen Caroline, and met Madge

Wildfire in the way. It was the time when the polite world was

composed of 'men, women and Herveys'; when Squire Pendarves was found

dead in his bed in Greek Street, Soho, leaving his young widow to be

courted by John Wesley and wedded by Dr Delany; when statesmen bribed,

and young blades drank, and Sir Harbottle carried off Harriet Byron,

whose shrieks brought Sir Charles Grandison to the rescue, sword in

hand. It was the period when the Jacobite Rebellion flamed up and

expired; when the Young Pretender marched to Derby and the heads of

the decapitated lords were exposed on Temple Bar; tragedies, agonies,

highway robberies, Dick Turpin, Jack Sheppard, smugglers, the

press-gang; Frederick Prince of Wales quarrelling in Leicester Square;

Queen Caroline on her death-bed telling her weeping little George,

'que l'un n'empêche pas l'autre'; Horace Walpole making the grand

tour; Dean Swift dying in agonised misery. Merciful Heavens! What an

England, of which we possess the daily diary! We can see Hogarth at

his easel, and Sir Joshua taking his first stiff portraits, and

Garrick going on pilgrimage to Stratford, and the young king courting

Hannah Lightfoot and marrying his little bride from Mecklenburg.

Without too much verifying of dates it is certain that all this was

happening before Dr Priestley was thirty years of age, and that of

none of it is there the faintest mention in the account he has drawn

up of his own childhood, youth and young manhood, though he was

himself destined to be one of the principal illustrations of the

Georgian era. For anything which appears to the contrary, he and his

friends might have dwelt in some far-distant planet whose inhabitants

were wholly given up to study and to prayer."

Priestley says of his father that he had a strong sense of religion,

praying with his family morning and evening, and carefully teaching his

children and servants the Assembly's Catechism, which was all the system

of which he had any knowledge.

"In the latter part of his life he became very fond of Mr Whitfield's

writings and other works of a similar kind, having been brought up in

the principles of Calvinism, and adopting them, but without ever

giving much attention to matters of speculation, and entertaining no

bigoted aversion to those who differed from him on the subject."

We may well imagine that Jonas, with his "strong sense of religion," was

one of that earnest band of "several hundreds of plain people" who

listened, spellbound, to the eloquence of John Wesley on that memorable

day of May 1742, on which, on Birstall Hill, began the great Yorkshire

"Revival."

Of his wife, "a woman of exemplary piety," the mother of the future

philosopher, little has been recorded beyond the fragmentary notice in

her son's autobiography. He says of her:--

"It is but little that I can recollect of my mother. I remember,

however, that she was careful to teach me the Assembly's Catechism,

and to give me the best instructions the little time that I was at

home. Once in particular, when I was playing with a pin, she asked me

where I got it; and on telling her that I found it at my uncle's, who

lived very near to my father, and where I had been playing with my

cousins, she made me carry it back again; no doubt to impress my mind,

as it could not fail to do, with a clear idea of the distinction of

property and of the importance of attending to it. She died in the

hard winter of 1739,[3] not long after being delivered of my youngest

brother; and having dreamed a little before her death that she was in

a delightful place, which she particularly described and imagined to

be heaven, the last words which she spake, as my aunt informed me,

were, 'Let me go to that fine place.'"

During some considerable portion of his mother's short period of married

life, Joseph Priestley, together with his brother Timothy, was committed

to the care of his grandfather Swift, with whom he remained with little

interruption until his mother's death. From this we may infer that the

domestic circumstances of his parents were far from easy, or that the

accommodation at Fieldhead was unequal to the support of the

cloth-dresser's rapidly-increasing family.

Timothy, who, after following his father's business as a cloth-dresser

for a time, became an Independent minister, and died in London, has left

us reminiscences of his brother's boyhood. He seems to have been

particularly impressed with his ability to repeat the Assembly's

Catechism "without missing a word," and by being made to kneel down with

him while he prayed. "This was not at bed-time, which he never

neglected, but in the course of the day."

On the death of his mother, the eldest boy, then barely six years old,

was taken home and sent to school in the neighbourhood. Luckily for him,

his Aunt Sarah, Mrs Keighley, "a truly pious and excellent woman, who

knew no other use of wealth, or of talents of any kind, than to do good,

and who never spared herself for this purpose," being childless,

offered, in 1742, to relieve her brother Jonas of all care for his

eldest son by taking entire charge of him. "From this time," says her

nephew, "she was truly a parent to me, till her death in 1764."

John Keighley was a man of considerable property, and at his death,

which occurred when Priestley was about twelve years of age, the widow

was left with the greater part of his fortune for life, and much of it

at her disposal after her death.

By Mrs Keighley's direction he was sent, he tells us, to several schools

in the neighbourhood, especially to a large free school under the care

of a clergyman, Mr Hague, under whom, at the age of twelve or thirteen,

he first began to make progress in Latin and acquired the elements of

Greek. His brother Timothy records that "from eleven to about thirteen

he had read most of Mr Bunyan's works and other authors on religion,

besides the common Latin authors."

How a well-ordered school was conducted in the middle of the eighteenth

century may be gleaned from the following regulations in force in Mr

Canton's well-known academy in 1745:--

1. That the School hours are from 7 o'clock in the morning till 12,

and from 2 to 5 in the afternoon: except the winter half-year, when

they begin at 8 in the morning.

2. That all the Scholars come decently, that is, with their Hands and

Faces wash'd, their Hair or Perriwigs Comb'd, and their Shoes black'd.

3. That they bow at Coming in and going out, and when any Thing is

given or rec'd; and never wear their Hats in the House or School.

4. That they loiter not, but go immediately to their own seats and

move not thence, without Leave, till School is done.

5. That if any Person come into the School whom they know, they are to

get up, make a bow, and sit down in their places again.

6. That if the Master be discoursing with, or reading to any Person,

they shall not stare Confidently on them or hearken to their Talk,

unless required to be present.

7. That they shall not interrupt the Master while a Stranger is

talking with him, with any Question, request, or complaint whatsoever,

but stay till he is at Leisure.

8. That they shall not presume to talk loud nor make any noise in

getting their lessons. A Boy's Tongue should never be heard, but in

saying his Lesson, asking or Answering a Question.

9. That there be no buying, selling, changing, laying Wagers or Gaming

in School-time, on the forfeiture of the whole so bought or sold, etc.

10. That those who learn French shall not speak English to any that

learn French, on the Forfeiture of ye Bill, or one Hour's Exercize

after School Time.

11. That such as learn Latin are also oblig'd not to speak other

Language to those that learn it, during School time, on the Penalty

last mentioned.

12. That all perform their Lessons and Exercises in fair Writing and

true Spelling, and likewise prepare themselves for their Examinations

in French, Latin, Accounts and Catechisms every week, both in School

times and all Vacations.

13. That such as perform well, shall be prefer'd according to their

Merit, and shall have liberty to leave School before the usual Time;

but such as are Negligent herein, shall have their Exercizes to write

over again after School.

14. That none presume to call any Party or Nick-names nor give any ill

or reproachful Language, much less Curse, Sware, or Lye, but in all

things behave in a quiet, peaceable, and civil manner.

15. That the Boarders shall not go beyond y^e bounds belonging to y^e

House on any pretence whatsoever without leave, on the forfeiture of

6d. or two Hours' Exercize after School for Every such Offence.

16. That one Scholar is not to strike another, or challenge him to

fight; but in case of any Difference shall acquaint the Master

therewith and be satisfied with his Determination.

Whilst acquiring Greek at the public school, Priestley learned Hebrew on

holidays of the Dissenting minister of the place, Mr Kirkby, under whose

care he eventually came.

The weakly, consumptive habit into which he now fell necessitated his

withdrawal from school. His fondness for books had led his aunt to

encourage the hope that he might be trained for the ministry, and he

readily entered into her views.

"But," he says, "my ill health obliged me to turn my thoughts another

way, and, with a view to trade, I learned the modern languages,

French, Italian and High Dutch [German], without a master; and in the

first and last of them I translated and wrote letters for an uncle of

mine who was a merchant, and who intended to put me into a

counting-house in Lisbon."

Indeed, he says a house was actually engaged to receive him there, and

everything was nearly ready for his undertaking the voyage when his

health so far improved that the idea of the ministry was resumed. During

the two years in which he had been kept away from school the boy was

thrown almost entirely upon his own resources. It says much for the

activity and eagerness of his mind, his diligence and his power of

mental acquisitiveness, that he should have neglected no opportunity of

gaining knowledge from the various heretical divines who came to drink a

dish of tea with his aunt. He tells us that from Mr Haggerstone, a

Dissenting minister in the neighbourhood, who had been educated under

Maclaurin, and whom he visited twice a week, he learned geometry,

algebra and various branches of mathematics, theoretical and practical.

He also read, with but little assistance from him, Gravesend's _Elements

of Natural Philosophy_, Watts's _Logic_, and Locke's _Essay on the Human

Understanding_. "He also gave lessons in Hebrew to a Baptist minister at

Gildersome, a village about four miles from Leeds, and by that means

made himself 'a considerable proficient in that language.'" "At the same

time I learned Chaldee and Syriac, and just began to read Arabic."

As his knowledge increased, and the powers of his intellect

strengthened, he began to exercise his reason upon the many problems of

doctrine and religious belief which could not fail to be uppermost in

his mind when his upbringing and the environment in which circumstances

had placed him are considered. His aunt, although a strict Calvinist,

was a large-minded woman, and, as her nephew says, "far from confining

salvation to those who thought as she did on religious subjects."

"Her home," he says, "was the resort of all the dissenting ministers

in the neighbourhood, without distinction, and those who were the most

obnoxious, on account of their heresy, were almost as welcome to her,

if she thought them honest and good men (which she was not unwilling

to do), as any others."

Although all the religious books that came in his way tended to confirm

him in the principles of Calvinism, he was led by the natural vigour of

his mind, and by an innate spirit of philosophical optimism, which

strengthened with advancing years, to feel a repugnance to its gloomy

tenets, and to question the sufficiency and reasonableness of much of

its doctrine. The conversation of the heretical divines in whose company

he was thrown served, moreover, to awaken inquiry and to increase his

doubts. These divines were for the most part men who, in liberality of

thought, were far in advance of the congregations they served, and this

was especially the case of those for whose attainments and character the

discerning boy had most respect.

The youth, who as a child had lisped at his mother's knee, "without

missing a word," the formularies of the Assembly's Catechism, was now

tortured with doubt and misgiving as he strove to penetrate into and to

realise the meaning of the phrases his memory so tenaciously retained.

And the more he read and the more he pondered the more disquieted he

became.

"Having," he says, "read many books of _experiences_, and, in

consequence, believing that a _new birth_, produced by the immediate

agency of the Spirit of God, was necessary to salvation, and not being

able to satisfy myself that I _had_ experienced anything of the kind,

I felt occasionally such distress of mind as it is not in my power to

describe, and which I still look back upon with horror.

Notwithstanding I had nothing very material to reproach myself with, I

often concluded that God had forsaken me, and that mine was like the

case of Francis Spira, to whom, as he imagined, repentance and

salvation were denied. In that state of mind I remember reading the

account of the man in the iron cage in the _Pilgrim's Progress_ with

the greatest perturbation."

"I imagine," he continues, "that even these conflicts of mind were not

without their use, as they led me to think habitually of God and a

future state. And though my feelings were then, no doubt, too full of

terror, what remained of them was a deep reverence for divine things,

and in time a pleasing satisfaction which can never be effaced, and I

hope was strengthened as I have advanced in life and acquired more

rational notions of religion. The remembrance, however, of what I

sometimes felt in that state of ignorance and darkness gives me a

peculiar sense of the value of rational principles of religion, and of

which I can give but an imperfect description to others."

At the time he was greatly distressed that he could not feel a proper

repentance for the sin of Adam, taking it for granted, he says, that

without _this_ it could not be forgiven him. The fact was that, under

the influence of his friends, Haggerstone and Walker, he was insensibly

following Baxter in attempting to reconcile the doctrines of Arminius

and Calvin, and he ended by embracing those of Arminius. It was

repugnant to his sense of equity and justice that, in the words of his

Catechism, "All mankind, by the fall of our first parents, lost

communion with God, are under his wrath and curse, and so made liable to

all miseries in this life, to death itself, and to the pains of hell for

ever."

His first trial of faith came when he applied for admission as a

communicant in the congregation which he had always attended. The old

minister was willing enough to receive him, but the elders, who had the

government of the church, discovering this unsoundness on the subject of

the sin of Adam, stoutly refused to sanction his admission.

Whilst the taint of heresy appears not to have greatly distressed the

worthy Mrs Keighley, it doubtless added to her difficulties in shaping

his course towards the ministry. In the natural order of things he was

to have been sent to the academy at Mile End, a hot-bed of Calvinism,

then under the care of Dr Cawder.

"But," he says, "being at that time an Arminian, I resolutely opposed

it, especially upon finding that if I went thither, besides giving an

_experience_, I must subscribe my assent to ten printed articles of

the strictest Calvinistic faith, and repeat it every six months."

It now looked as if the idea of the ministry was to be given up for good

and all, and given up it probably would have been but for the

intercession of Mr Kirkby, who strongly recommended that he should be

placed under the care of the good and learned Dr Doddridge.

"Mr Kirby," says Priestley, "had received a good education himself,

was a good classical scholar, and had no opinion of the mode of

education among the very orthodox Dissenters, and being fond of me, he

was desirous of my having every advantage that could be procured for

me. My good aunt, not being a bigoted Calvinist, entered into his

views."

Priestley had another ally in his step-mother, for his father had

married again. She was a woman of good sense as well as of religion, and

had been sometime housekeeper to Dr Doddridge, of whom she had a high

opinion, and had always recommended his academy.

To Dr Doddridge, however, he was not destined to go. That eminent divine

was in the last stages of the malady to which he eventually succumbed,

and he died at Lisbon in the October of 1751.

Joseph Priestley · 第 1 / 12 章