Specific documents

To the extent that the Royal Commission Report has pointed to any

particular classes of documentary material that did not reach the

Inquiry the list is not a long one. It comprises--

1. Unidentified papers within the blue envelope--No complaint about

this was ever made by Mr Chippindale as we have mentioned.

2. Papers given to First Officer Cassin as briefing material--It

has been explained that if any complaint could be made about this

matter it would affect Captain Crosbie, the unnamed "employee of

the airline" referred to in paragraph 52. It was he who went to the

Cassin home for compassionate reasons as the spokesman for the

Airline Pilots Association. He denies ever receiving the material.

Even if he had, the Report has not challenged the conduct of any of

the line pilots. This matter would seem to be irrelevant.

3. Documents or papers that may have been shredded by Mr Oldfield

following the decision of the in-house committee which met during

the week beginning 3rd December 1979--This matter requires no

further discussion.

4. Pages within the cover of a ring-binder notebook of Captain

Collins--This matter too was handled by Captain Crosbie. However,

it requires some specific mention because in paragraph 352 it has

been associated with Captain Gemmell and as all counsel now

acknowledge this has been done in error. The paragraph is one of

the specific paragraphs challenged by these proceedings.

5. Briefing or other flight documents (including a New Zealand

Atlas) taken onto the aircraft within Captain Collins' flight bag;

and similar papers within a flight bag owned by First Officer

Cassin--This matter also requires discussion.

Judgments of the Court of Appeal of New Zealand on Proceedings to Review Aspects of the Report of the Royal Commission of Inquiry into the Mount Erebus Aircraft Disaster C.A. 95/81 · 第 30 / 41 题