For all that the electric current is not as yet produced as economically

as it should be, we do wrong if we regard it as an infant force. However

much new knowledge may do with electricity in the laboratory, in the

factory, or in the exchange, some of its best work is already done. It

is not likely ever to perform a greater feat than placing all mankind

within ear-shot of each other. Were electricity unmastered there could

be no democratic government of the United States. To-day the drama of

national affairs is more directly in view of every American citizen

than, a century ago, the public business of Delaware could be to the men

of that little State. And when on the broader stage of international

politics misunderstandings arise, let us note how the telegraph has

modified the hard-and-fast rules of old-time diplomacy. To-day, through

the columns of the press, the facts in controversy are instantly

published throughout the world, and thus so speedily give rise to

authoritative comment that a severe strain is put upon negotiators whose

tradition it is to be both secret and slow.

Railroads, with all they mean for civilization, could not have extended

themselves without the telegraph to control them. And railroads and

telegraphs are the sinews and nerves of national life, the prime

agencies in welding the diverse and widely separated States and

Territories of the Union. A Boston merchant builds a cotton-mill in

Georgia; a New York capitalist opens a copper-mine in Arizona. The

telegraph which informs them day by day how their investments prosper

tells idle men where they can find work, where work can seek idle men.

Chicago is laid in ashes, Charleston topples in earthquake, Johnstown is

whelmed in flood, and instantly a continent springs to their relief. And

what benefits issue in the strictly commercial uses of the telegraph!

At its click both locomotive and steamship speed to the relief of famine

in any quarter of the globe. In times of plenty or of dearth the markets

of the globe are merged and are brought to every man's door. Not less

striking is the neighbourhood guild of science, born, too, of the

telegraph. The day after Roentgen announced his X rays, physicists on

every continent were repeating his experiments--were applying his

discovery to the healing of the wounded and diseased. Let an anti-toxin

for diphtheria, consumption, or yellow fever be proposed, and a hundred

investigators the world over bend their skill to confirm or disprove, as

if the suggester dwelt next door.

On a stage less dramatic, or rather not dramatic at all, electricity

works equal good. Its motor freeing us from dependence on the horse is

spreading our towns and cities into their adjoining country. Field and

garden compete with airless streets. The sunny cottage is in active

rivalry with the odious tenement-house. It is found that transportation

within the gates of a metropolis has an importance second only to the

means of transit which links one city with another. The engineer is at

last filling the gap which too long existed between the traction of

horses and that of steam. In point of speed, cleanliness, and comfort

such an electric subway as that of South London leaves nothing to be

desired. Throughout America electric roads, at first suburban, are now

fast joining town to town and city to city, while, as auxiliaries to

steam railroads, they place sparsely settled communities in the arterial

current of the world, and build up a ready market for the dairyman and

the fruit-grower. In its saving of what Mr. Oscar T. Crosby has called

"man-hours" the third-rail system is beginning to oust steam as a motive

power from trunk-lines. Already shrewd railroad managers are granting

partnerships to the electricians who might otherwise encroach upon their

dividends. A service at first restricted to passengers has now extended

itself to the carriage of letters and parcels, and begins to reach out

for common freight. We may soon see the farmer's cry for good roads

satisfied by good electric lines that will take his crops to market much

more cheaply and quickly than horses and macadam ever did. In cities,

electromobile cabs and vans steadily increase in numbers, furthering the

quiet and cleanliness introduced by the trolley car.

A word has been said about the blessings which electricity promises to

country folk, yet greater are the boons it stands ready to bestow in the

hives of population. Until a few decades ago the water-supply of cities

was a matter not of municipal but of individual enterprise; water was

drawn in large part from wells here and there, from lines of piping laid

in favoured localities, and always insufficient. Many an epidemic of

typhoid fever was due to the contamination of a spring by a cesspool a

few yards away. To-day a supply such as that of New York is abundant

and cheap because it enters every house. Let a centralized electrical

service enjoy a like privilege, and it will offer a current which is

heat, light, chemical energy, or motive power, and all at a wage lower

than that of any other servant. Unwittingly, then, the electrical

engineer is a political reformer of high degree, for he puts a new

premium upon ability and justice at the City Hall. His sole condition is

that electricity shall be under control at once competent and honest.

Let us hope that his plea, joined to others as weighty, may quicken the

spirit of civic righteousness so that some of the richest fruits ever

borne in the garden of science and art may not be proffered in vain.

Flame, the old-time servant, is individual; electricity, its successor

and heir, is collective. Flame sits upon the hearth and draws a family

together; electricity, welling from a public source, may bind into a

unit all the families of a vast city, because it makes the benefit of

each the interest of all.

But not every promise brought forward in the name of the electrician has

his assent or sanction. So much has been done by electricity, and so

much more is plainly feasible, that a reflection of its triumphs has

gilded many a baseless dream. One of these is that the cheap electric

motor, by supply power at home, will break up the factory system, and

bring back the domestic manufacturing of old days. But if this power

cost nothing at all the gift would leave the factory unassailed; for we

must remember that power is being steadily reduced in cost from year to

year, so that in many industries it has but a minor place among the

expenses of production. The strength and profit of the factory system

lie in its assembling a wide variety of machines, the first delivering

its product to the second for another step toward completion, and so on

until a finished article is sent to the ware-room. It is this minute

subdivision of labour, together with the saving and efficiency that

inure to a business conducted on an immense scale under a single

manager, that bids us believe that the factory has come to stay. To be

sure, a weaver, a potter, or a lens-grinder of peculiar skill may thrive

at his loom or wheel at home; but such a man is far from typical in

modern manufacture. Besides, it is very questionable whether the

lamentations over the home industries of the past do not ignore evil

concomitants such as still linger in the home industries of the

present--those of the sweater's den, for example.

This rapid survey of what electricity has done and may yet do--futile

expectation dismissed--has shown it the creator of a thousand material

resources, the perfector of that communication of things, of power, of

thought, which in every prior stage of advancement has marked the

successive lifts of humanity. It was much when the savage loaded a pack

upon a horse or an ox instead of upon his own back; it was yet more when

he could make a beacon-flare give news or warning to a whole

country-side, instead of being limited to the messages which might be

read in his waving hands. All that the modern engineer was able to do

with steam for locomotion is raised to a higher plane by the advent of

his new power, while the long-distance transmission of electrical energy

is contracting the dimensions of the planet to a scale upon which its

cataracts in the wilderness drive the spindles and looms of the factory

town, or illuminate the thoroughfares of cities. Beyond and above all

such services as these, electricity is the corner-stone of physical

generalization, a revealer of truths impenetrable by any other ray.

The subjugation of fire has done much in giving man a new independence

of nature, a mighty armoury against evil. In curtailing the most arduous

and brutalizing forms of toil, electricity, that subtler kind of fire,

carries this emancipation a long step further, and, meanwhile, bestows

upon the poor many a luxury which but lately was the exclusive

possession of the rich. In more closely binding up the good of the bee

with the welfare of the hive, it is an educator and confirmer of every

social bond. In so far as it proffers new help in the war on pain and

disease it strengthens the confidence of man in an Order of Right and

Happiness which for so many dreary ages has been a matter rather of hope

than of vision. Are we not, then, justified in holding electricity to be

a multiplier of faculty and insight, a means of dignifying mind and

soul, unexampled since man first kindled fire and rejoiced?

We have traced how dexterity rose to fire-making, how fire-making led to

the subjugation of electricity. Much of the most telling work of fire

can be better done by its great successor, while electricity performs

many tasks possible only to itself. Unwitting truth there was in the

simple fable of the captive who let down a spider's film, that drew up a

thread, which in turn brought up a rope--and freedom. It was in 1800 on

the threshold of the nineteenth century, that Volta devised the first

electric battery. In a hundred years the force then liberated has

vitally interwoven itself with every art and science, bearing fruit not

to be imagined even by men of the stature of Watt, Lavoisier, or

Humboldt. Compare this rapid march of conquest with the slow adaptation,

through age after age, of fire to cooking, smelting, tempering. Yet it

was partly, perhaps mainly, because the use of fire had drawn out man's

intelligence and cultivated his skill that he was ready in the fulness

of time so quickly to seize upon electricity and subdue it.

Electricity is as legitimately the offspring of fire as fire of the

simple knack in which one savage in ten thousand was richer than his

fellows. The principle of permutation, suggested in both victories,

interprets not only how vast empire is won by a new weapon of prime

dignity; it explains why such empires are brought under rule with

ever-accelerated pace. Every talent only pioneers the way for the

richer talents which are born from it.

FOOTNOTES:

[5] Permutations are the various ways in which two or more different

things may be arranged in a row, all the things appearing in each row.

Permutations are readily illustrated with squares or cubes of different

colours, with numbers, or letters.

Permutations of two elements, 1 and 2, are (1 x 2) two; 1, 2; 2, 1; or

_a_, _b_; _b_, _a_. Of three elements the permutations are (1 x 2 x 3)

six; 1, 2, 3; 1, 3, 2; 2, 1, 3; 2, 3, 1; 3, 1, 2; 3, 2, 1; or _a_, _b_,

_c_; _a_, _c_, _b_; _b_, _a_, _c_; _b_, _c_, _a_; _c_, _a_, _b_; _c_,

_b_, _a_. Of four elements the permutations are (1 x 2 x 3 x 4)

twenty-four; of five elements, one hundred and twenty, and so on. A new

element or permutator multiplies by an increasing figure all the

permutations it finds.

[6] Some years ago I sent an outline of this argument to Herbert

Spencer, who replied: "I recognize a novelty and value in your inference

that the law implies an increasing width of gap between lower and higher

types as evolution advances."

COUNT RUMFORD IDENTIFIES HEAT WITH MOTION.

[Benjamin Thompson, who received the title of Count Rumford from

the Elector of Bavaria, was born in Woburn, Massachusetts, in 1753.

When thirty-one years of age he settled in Munich, where he devoted

his remarkable abilities to the public service. Twelve years

afterward he removed to England; in 1800 he founded the Royal

Institution of London, since famous as the theatre of the labours

of Davy, Faraday, Tyndall, and Dewar. He bequeathed to Harvard

University a fund to endow a professorship of the application of

science to the art of living: he instituted a prize to be awarded

by the American Academy of Sciences for the most important

discoveries and improvements relating to heat and light. In 1804 he

married the widow of the illustrious chemist Lavoisier: he died in

1814. Count Rumford on January 25, 1798, read a paper before the

Royal Society entitled "An Enquiry Concerning the Source of Heat

Which Is Excited by Friction." The experiments therein detailed

proved that heat is identical with motion, as against the notion

that heat is matter. He thus laid the corner-stone of the modern

theory that heat light, electricity, magnetism, chemical action,

and all other forms of energy are in essence motion, are

convertible into one another, and as motion are indestructible. The

following abstract of Count Rumford's paper is taken from "Heat as

a Mode of Motion," by Professor John Tyndall, published by D.

Appleton & Co., New York. This work and "The Correlation and

Conservation of Forces," edited by Dr. E. L. Youmans, published by

the same house, will serve as a capital introduction to the modern

theory that energy is motion which, however varied in its forms, is

changeless in its quantity.]

Being engaged in superintending the boring of cannon in the workshops of

the military arsenal at Munich, Count Rumford was struck with the very

considerable degree of heat which a brass gun acquires, in a short time,

in being bored, and with the still more intense heat (much greater than

that of boiling water) of the metallic chips separated from it by the

borer, he proposed to himself the following questions:

"Whence comes the heat actually produced in the mechanical operations

above mentioned?

"Is it furnished by the metallic chips which are separated from the

metal?"

If this were the case, then the _capacity for heat_ of the parts of the

metal so reduced to chips ought not only to be changed, but the change

undergone by them should be sufficiently great to account for _all_ the

heat produced. No such change, however, had taken place, for the chips

were found to have the same capacity as slices of the same metal cut by

a fine saw, where heating was avoided. Hence, it is evident, that the

heat produced could not possibly have been furnished at the expense of

the latent heat of the metallic chips. Rumford describes these

experiments at length, and they are conclusive.

He then designed a cylinder for the express purpose of generating heat

by friction, by having a blunt borer forced against its solid bottom,

while the cylinder was turned around its axis by the force of horses. To

measure the heat developed, a small round hole was bored in the

cylinder for the purpose of introducing a small mercurial thermometer.

The weight of the cylinder was 113.13 pounds avoirdupois.

The borer was a flat piece of hardened steel, 0.63 of an inch thick,

four inches long, and nearly as wide as the cavity of the bore of the

cylinder, namely, three and one-half inches. The area of the surface by

which its end was in contact with the bottom of the bore was nearly two

and one-half inches. At the beginning of the experiment the temperature

of the air in the shade, and also that of the cylinder, was 60 deg. Fahr. At

the end of thirty minutes, and after the cylinder had made 960

revolutions round its axis, the temperature was found to be 130 deg..

Having taken away the borer, he now removed the metallic dust, or rather

scaly matter, which had been detached from the bottom of the cylinder by

the blunt steel borer, and found its weight to be 837 grains troy. "Is

it possible," he exclaims, "that the very considerable quantity of heat

produced in this experiment--a quantity which actually raised the

temperature of above 113 pounds of gun-metal at least 70 deg. of

Fahrenheit's thermometer--could have been furnished by so inconsiderable

a quantity of metallic dust and this merely in consequence of a _change_

in its capacity of heat?"

"But without insisting on the improbability of this supposition, we have

only to recollect that from the results of actual and decisive

experiments, made for the express purpose of ascertaining that fact,

the capacity for heat for the metal of which great guns are cast is _not

sensibly changed_ by being reduced to the form of metallic chips, and

there does not seem to be any reason to think that it can be much

changed, if it be changed at all, in being reduced to much smaller

pieces by a borer which is less sharp."

He next surrounded his cylinder by an oblong deal-box, in such a manner

that the cylinder could turn water-tight in the centre of the box, while

the borer was pressed against the bottom of the cylinder. The box was

filled with water until the entire cylinder was covered, and then the

apparatus was set in action. The temperature of the water on commencing

was 60 deg..

"The result of this beautiful experiment," writes Rumford, "was very

striking, and the pleasure it afforded me amply repaid me for all the

trouble I had had in contriving and arranging the complicated machinery

used in making it. The cylinder had been in motion but a short time,

when I perceived, by putting my hand into the water, and touching the

outside of the cylinder, that heat was generated.

"At the end of one hour the fluid, which weighed 18.77 pounds, or two

and one-half gallons, had its temperature raised forty-seven degrees,

being now 107 deg..

"In thirty minutes more, or one hour and thirty minutes after the

machinery had been set in motion, the heat of the water was 142 deg..

"At the end of two hours from the beginning, the temperature was 178 deg..

"At two hours and twenty minutes it was 200 deg., and at two hours and

thirty minutes it _actually boiled_!"

"It would be difficult to describe the surprise and astonishment

expressed in the countenances of the bystanders on seeing so large a

quantity of water heated, and actually made to boil, without any fire.

Though, there was nothing that could be considered very surprising in

this matter, yet I acknowledge fairly that it afforded me a degree of

childish pleasure which, were I ambitious of the reputation of a grave

philosopher, I ought most certainly rather to hide than to discover."

He then carefully estimates the quantity of heat possessed by each

portion of his apparatus at the conclusion of the experiment, and,

adding all together, finds a total sufficient to raise 26.58 pounds of

ice-cold water to its boiling point, or through 180 deg. Fahrenheit. By

careful calculation, he finds this heat equal to that given out by the

combustion of 2,303.8 grains (equal to four and eight-tenths ounces

troy) of wax.

He then determines the "_celerity_" with which the heat was generated,

summing up thus: "From the results of these computations, it appears

that the quantity of heat produced equably, or in a continuous stream,

if I may use the expression, by the friction of the blunt steel borer

against the bottom of the hollow metallic cylinder, was _greater_ than

that produced in the combustion of nine _wax-candles_, each

three-quarters of an inch in diameter, all burning together with clear

bright flames.

"One horse would have been equal to the work performed, though two were

actually employed. Heat may thus be produced merely by the strength of a

horse, and, in a case of necessity, this heat might be used in cooking

victuals. But no circumstances could be imagined in which this method of

procuring heat would be advantageous, for more heat might be obtained by

using the fodder necessary for the support of a horse as fuel."

[This is an extremely significant passage, intimating as it does, that

Rumford saw clearly that the force of animals was derived from the food;

_no creation of force_ taking place in the animal body.]

"By meditating on the results of all these experiments, we are naturally

brought to that great question which has so often been the subject of

speculation among philosophers, namely, What is heat--is there any such

thing as an _igneous fluid_? Is there anything that, with propriety, can

be called caloric?

"We have seen that a very considerable quantity of heat may be excited

by the friction of two metallic surfaces, and given off in a constant

stream or flux _in all directions_, without interruption or

intermission, and without any signs of _diminution_ or _exhaustion_. In

reasoning on this subject we must not forget _that most remarkable

circumstance_, that the source of the heat generated by friction in

these experiments appeared evidently to be _inexhaustible_. [The italics

are Rumford's.] It is hardly necessary to add, that anything which any

_insulated_ body or system of bodies can continue to furnish _without

limitation_ cannot possibly be a _material substance_; and it appears to

me to be extremely difficult, if not quite impossible, to form any

distinct idea of anything capable of being excited and communicated in

those experiments, except it be MOTION."

When the history of the dynamical theory of heat is written, the man

who, in opposition to the scientific belief of his time, could

experiment and reason upon experiment, as Rumford did in the

investigation here referred to, cannot be lightly passed over. Hardly

anything more powerful against the materiality of heat has been since

adduced, hardly anything more conclusive in the way of establishing that

heat is, what Rumford considered it to be, _Motion_.

VICTORY OF THE "ROCKET" LOCOMOTIVE.

[Part of Chapter XII. Part II, of "The Life of George Stephenson

and of His Son, Robert Stephenson," by Samuel Smiles New York,

Harper & Brothers, 1868.]

The works of the Liverpool and Manchester Railway were now approaching

completion. But, strange to say, the directors had not yet decided as to

the tractive power to be employed in working the line when open for

traffic. The differences of opinion among them were so great as

apparently to be irreconcilable. It was necessary, however, that they

should, come to some decision without further loss of time, and many

board meetings were accordingly held to discuss the subject. The

old-fashioned and well-tried system of horse-haulage was not without its

advocates; but, looking at the large amount of traffic which there was

to be conveyed, and at the probable delay in the transit from station to

station if this method were adopted, the directors, after a visit made

by them to the Northumberland and Durham railways in 1828, came to the

conclusion that the employment of horse-power was inadmissible.

Fixed engines had many advocates; the locomotive very few: it stood as

yet almost in a minority of one--George Stephenson....

In the meantime the discussion proceeded as to the kind of power to be

permanently employed for the working of the railway. The directors were

inundated with schemes of all sorts for facilitating locomotion. The

projectors of England, France, and America seemed to be let loose upon

them. There were plans for working the waggons along the line by

water-power. Some proposed hydrogen, and others carbonic acid gas.

Atmospheric pressure had its eager advocates. And various kinds of fixed

and locomotive steam-power were suggested. Thomas Gray urged his plan of

a greased road with cog-rails; and Messrs. Vignolles and Ericsson

recommended the adoption of a central friction-rail, against which two

horizontal rollers under the locomotive, pressing upon the sides of this

rail, were to afford the means of ascending the inclined planes....

The two best practical engineers of the day concurred in reporting

substantially in favour of the employment of fixed engines. Not a single

professional man of eminence could be found to coincide with the

engineer of the railway in his preference for locomotive over fixed

engine power. He had scarcely a supporter, and the locomotive system

seemed on the eve of being abandoned. Still he did not despair. With the

profession against him, and public opinion against him--for the most

frightful stories went abroad respecting the dangers, the unsightliness,

and the nuisance which the locomotive would create--Stephenson held to

his purpose. Even in this, apparently the darkest hour of the

locomotive, he did not hesitate to declare that locomotive railroads

would, before many years had passed, be "the great highways of the

world."

Little Masterpieces of Science: Invention and Discovery · 第 8 / 10 段