Figure 6 shows the form of apparatus that I was then employing for

producing undulatory currents of electricity for the purpose of multiple

telegraphy. A steel reed, A, was clamped firmly by one extremity to the

uncovered leg _h_ of an electro-magnet E, and the free end of the reed

projected above the covered leg. When the reed A was vibrated in any

mechanical way the battery current was thrown into waves, and electrical

undulations traversed the circuit B E W E', throwing into vibration the

corresponding reed A' at the other end of the circuit. I immediately

proceeded to put my new idea to the test of practical experiment, and

for this purpose I attached the reed A (Fig. 7) loosely by one extremity

to the uncovered pole _h_ of the magnet, and fastened the other

extremity to the centre of a stretched membrane of goldbeaters' skin

_n_. I presumed that upon speaking in the neighbourhood of the membrane

_n_ it would be thrown into vibration and cause the steel reed A to move

in a similar manner, occasioning undulations in the electrical current

that would correspond to the changes in the density of the air during

the production of the sound; and I further thought that the change of

the density of the current at the receiving end would cause the magnet

there to attract the reed A' in such a manner that it should copy the

motion of the reed A, in which case its movements would occasion a sound

from the membrane _n'_ similar in _timbre_ to that which had occasioned

the original vibration.

[Illustration: Fig. 7]

[Illustration: Fig. 8]

The results, however, were unsatisfactory and discouraging. My friend,

Mr. Thomas A. Watson, who assisted me in this first experiment, declared

that he heard a faint sound proceed from the telephone at his end of the

circuit, but I was unable to verify his assertion. After many

experiments, attended by the same only partially successful results, I

determined to reduce the size and weight of the spring as much as

possible. For this purpose I glued a piece of clock spring about the

size and shape of my thumb nail, firmly to the centre of the diaphragm,

and had a similar instrument at the other end (Fig. 8); we were then

enabled to obtain distinctly audible effects. I remember an experiment

made with this telephone, which at the time gave me great satisfaction

and delight. One of the telephones was placed in my lecture room in the

Boston University, and the other in the basement of the adjoining

building. One of my students repaired to the distant telephone to

observe the effects of articulate speech, while I uttered the sentence,

"Do you understand what I say?" into the telephone placed in the lecture

hall. To my delight an answer was returned through the instrument

itself, articulate sounds proceeded from the steel spring attached to

the membrane, and I heard the sentence, "Yes, I understand you

perfectly." It is a mistake, however, to suppose that the articulation

was by any means perfect, and expectancy no doubt had a great deal to do

with my recognition of the sentence; still, the articulation was there,

and I recognized the fact that the indistinctness was entirely due to

the imperfection of the instrument. I will not trouble you by detailing

the various stages through which the apparatus passed, but shall merely

say that after a time I produced the form of instrument shown in Fig. 9,

which served very well as a receiving telephone. In this condition my

invention was, in 1876, exhibited at the Centennial Exhibition in

Philadelphia. The telephone shown in Fig. 8 was used as a transmitting

instrument, and that in Fig. 9 as a receiver, so that vocal

communication was only established in one direction....

[Illustration: Fig. 9]

The articulation produced from the instrument shown in Fig. 9 was

remarkably distinct, but its great defect consisted in the fact that it

could not be used as a transmitting instrument, and thus two telephones

were required at each station, one for transmitting and one for

receiving spoken messages.

[Illustration: Fig. 10]

It was determined to vary the construction of the telephone shown in

Fig. 8, and I sought, by changing the size and tension of the membrane,

the diameter and thickness of the steel spring, the size and power of

the magnet, and the coils of insulated wire around their poles, to

discover empirically the exact effect of each element of the

combination, and thus to deduce a more perfect form of apparatus. It was

found that a marked increase in the loudness of the sounds resulted from

shortening the length of the coils of wire, and by enlarging the iron

diaphragm which was glued to the membrane. In the latter case, also, the

distinctness of the articulation was improved. Finally, the membrane of

goldbeaters' skin was discarded entirely, and a simple iron plate was

used instead, and at once intelligible articulation was obtained. The

new form of instrument is that shown in Fig. 10, and, as had been long

anticipated, it was proved that the only use of the battery was to

magnetize the iron core, for the effects were equally audible when the

battery was omitted and a rod of magnetized steel substituted for the

iron core of the magnet.

[Illustration: Fig. 11]

It was my original intention, as shown in Fig. 3, and it was always

claimed by me, that the final form of telephone would be operated by

permanent magnets in place of batteries, and numerous experiments had

been carried on by Mr. Watson and myself privately for the purpose of

producing this effect.

At the time the instruments were first exhibited in public the results

obtained with permanent magnets were not nearly so striking as when a

voltaic battery was employed, wherefore we thought it best to exhibit

only the latter form of instrument.

The interest excited by the first published accounts of the operation of

the telephone led many persons to investigate the subject, and I doubt

not that numbers of experimenters have independently discovered that

permanent magnets might be employed instead of voltaic batteries.

Indeed, one gentleman, Professor Dolbear, of Tufts College, not only

claims to have discovered the magneto-electric telephone, but, I

understand, charges me with having obtained the idea from him through

the medium of a mutual friend.

A still more powerful form of apparatus was constructed by using a

powerful compound horseshoe magnet in place of the straight rod which

had been previously used (see Fig. 11). Indeed, the sounds produced by

means of this instrument were of sufficient loudness to be faintly

audible to a large audience, and in this condition the instrument was

exhibited in the Essex Institute, in Salem, Massachusetts, on the 12th

of February, 1877, on which occasion a short speech shouted into a

similar telephone in Boston sixteen miles away, was heard by the

audience in Salem. The tones of the speaker's voice were distinctly

audible to an audience of six hundred people, but the articulation was

only distinct at a distance of about six feet. On the same occasion,

also, a report of the lecture was transmitted by word of mouth from

Salem to Boston, and published in the papers the next morning.

From the form of telephone shown in Fig. 10 to the present form of the

instrument (Fig. 12) is but a step. It is, in fact, the arrangement of

Fig. 10 in a portable form, the magnet F. H. being placed inside the

handle and a more convenient form of mouthpiece provided....

It was always my belief that a certain ratio would be found between the

several parts of a telephone, and that the size of the instrument was

immaterial; but Professor Peirce was the first to demonstrate the

extreme smallness of the magnets which might be employed. And here, in

order to show the parallel lines in which we were working, I may mention

the fact that two or three days after I had constructed a telephone of

the portable form (Fig. 12), containing the magnet inside the handle,

Dr. Channing was kind enough to send me a pair of telephones of a

similar pattern, which had been invented by experimenters at Providence.

The convenient form of the mouthpiece shown in Fig. 12, now adopted by

me, was invented solely by my friend, Professor Peirce. I must also

express my obligations to my friend and associate, Mr. Thomas A. Watson,

of Salem, Massachusetts, who has for two years past given me his

personal assistance in carrying on my researches.

In pursuing my investigations I have ever had one end in view--the

practical improvement of electric telegraphy--but I have come across

many facts which, while having no direct bearing upon the subject of

telegraphy, may yet possess an interest for you.

For instance, I have found that a musical tone proceeds from a piece of

plumbago or retort carbon when an intermittent current of electricity is

passed through it, and I have observed the most curious audible effects

produced by the passage of reversed intermittent currents through the

human body. A breaker was placed in circuit with the primary wires of an

induction coil, and the fine wires were connected with two strips of

brass. One of these strips was held closely against the ear, and a loud

sound proceeded from it whenever the other slip was touched with the

other hand. The strips of brass were next held one in each hand. The

induced currents occasioned a muscular tremor in the fingers. Upon

placing my forefinger to my ear a loud crackling noise was audible,

seemingly proceeding from the finger itself. A friend who was present

placed my finger to his ear, but heard nothing. I requested him to hold

the strips himself. He was then distinctly conscious of a noise (which I

was unable to perceive) proceeding from his finger. In this case a

portion of the induced current passed through the head of the observer

when he placed his ear against his own finger, and it is possible that

the sound was occasioned by a vibration of the surfaces of the ear and

finger in contact.

When two persons receive a shock from a Ruhmkorff's coil by clasping

hands, each taking hold of one wire of the coil with the free hand, a

sound proceeds from the clasped hands. The effect is not produced when

the hands are moist. When either of the two touches the body of the

other a loud sound comes from the parts in contact. When the arm of one

is placed against the arm of the other, the noise produced can be heard

at a distance of several feet. In all these cases a slight shock is

experienced so long as the contact is preserved. The introduction of a

piece of paper between the parts in contact does not materially

interfere with the production of the sounds, but the unpleasant effects

of the shock are avoided.

[Illustration: Fig. 12]

When an intermittent current from a Ruhmkorff's coil is passed through

the arms a musical note can be perceived when the ear is closely applied

to the arm of the person experimented upon. The sound seems to proceed

from the muscles of the fore-arm and from the biceps muscle. Mr. Elisha

Gray has also produced audible effects by the passage of electricity

through the human body.

An extremely loud musical note is occasioned by the spark of a

Ruhmkorff's coil when the primary circuit is made and broken with

sufficient rapidity. When two breakers of different pitch are caused

simultaneously to open and close the primary circuit a double tone

proceeds from the spark.

A curious discovery, which may be of interest to you, has been made by

Professor Blake. He constructed a telephone in which a rod of soft iron,

about six feet in length, was used instead of a permanent magnet. A

friend sang a continuous musical tone into the mouthpiece of a

telephone, like that shown in Fig. 12, which was connected with the soft

iron instrument alluded to above. It was found that the loudness of the

sound produced in this telephone varied with the direction in which the

iron rod was held, and that the maximum effect was produced when the rod

was in the position of the dipping needle. This curious discovery of

Professor Blake has been verified by myself.

When a telephone is placed in circuit with a telegraph line the

telephone is found seemingly to emit sounds on its own account. The most

extraordinary noises are often produced, the causes of which are at

present very obscure. One class of sounds is produced by the inductive

influence of neighbouring wires and by leakage from them, the signals of

the Morse alphabet passing over neighbouring wires being audible in the

telephone, and another class can be traced to earth currents upon the

wire, a curious modification of this sound revealing the presence of

defective joints in the wire.

Professor Blake informs me that he has been able to use the railroad

track for conversational purposes in place of a telegraph wire, and he

further states that when only one telephone was connected with the track

the sounds of Morse operating were distinctly audible in the telephone,

although the nearest telegraph wires were at least fifty feet distant.

Professor Peirce has observed the most singular sounds produced from a

telephone in connection with a telegraph wire during the aurora

borealis, and I have just heard of a curious phenomenon lately observed

by Dr. Channing. In the city of Providence, Rhode Island, there is an

over-house wire about one mile in extent with a telephone at either end.

On one occasion the sound of music and singing was faintly audible in

one of the telephones. It seemed as if some one were practising vocal

music with a pianoforte accompaniment. The natural supposition was that

experiments were being made with the telephone at the other end of the

circuit, but upon inquiry this proved not to have been the case.

Attention having thus been directed to the phenomenon, a watch was kept

upon the instruments, and upon a subsequent occasion the same fact was

observed at both ends of the line by Dr. Channing and his friends. It

was proved that the sounds continued for about two hours, and usually

commenced about the same time. A searching examination of the line

disclosed nothing abnormal in its condition, and I am unable to give you

any explanation of this curious phenomenon. Dr. Channing has, however,

addressed a letter upon the subject to the editor of one of the

Providence papers, giving the names of such songs as were recognized,

and full details of the observations, in the hope that publicity may

lead to the discovery of the performer, and thus afford a solution of

the mystery.

My friend, Mr. Frederick A. Gower, communicated to me a curious

observation made by him regarding the slight earth connection required

to establish a circuit for the telephone, and together we carried on a

series of experiments with rather startling results. We took a couple of

telephones and an insulated wire about 100 yards in length into a

garden, and were enabled to carry on conversation with the greatest ease

when we held in our hands what should have been the earth wire, so that

the connection with the ground was formed at either end through our

bodies, our feet being clothed with cotton socks and leather boots. The

day was fine, and the grass upon which we stood was seemingly perfectly

dry. Upon standing upon a gravel walk the vocal sounds, though much

diminished, were still perfectly intelligible, and the same result

occurred when standing upon a brick wall one foot in height, but no

sound was audible when one of us stood upon a block of freestone.

One experiment which we made is so very interesting that I must speak of

it in detail. Mr. Gower made earth connection at his end of the line by

standing upon a grass plot, whilst at the other end of the line I stood

upon a wooden board. I requested Mr. Gower to sing a continuous musical

note, and to my surprise the sound was very distinctly audible from the

telephone in my hand. Upon examining my feet I discovered that a single

blade of grass was bent over the edge of the board, and that my foot

touched it. The removal of this blade of grass was followed by the

cessation of the sound from the telephone, and I found that the moment I

touched with the toe of my boot a blade of grass or the petal of a daisy

the sound was again audible.

The question will naturally arise, Through what length of wire can the

telephone be used? In reply to this I may say that the maximum amount of

resistance through which the undulatory current will pass, and yet

retain sufficient force to produce an audible sound at the distant end,

has yet to be determined; no difficulty has, however, been experienced

in laboratory experiments in conversing through a resistance of 60,000

ohms, which has been the maximum at my disposal. On one occasion, not

having a rheostat [for producing resistance] at hand, I passed the

current through the bodies of sixteen persons, who stood hand in hand.

The longest length of real telegraph line through which I have attempted

to converse has been about 250 miles. On this occasion no difficulty was

experienced so long as parallel lines were not in operation. Sunday was

chosen as the day on which it was probable other circuits would be at

rest. Conversation was carried on between myself, in New York, and Mr.

Thomas A. Watson, in Boston, until the opening of business upon the

other wires. When this happened the vocal sounds were very much

diminished, but still audible. It seemed, indeed, like talking through a

storm. Conversation, though possible, could be carried on with

difficulty, owing to the distracting nature of the interfering currents.

I am informed by my friend Mr. Preece that conversation has been

successfully carried on through a submarine cable, sixty miles in

length, extending from Dartmouth to the Island of Guernsey, by means of

hand telephones.

PHOTOGRAPHING THE UNSEEN: THE ROENTGEN RAY

H. J. W. DAM

[By permission from _McClure's Magazine_, April, 1896, copyright by

S. S. McClure, Limited.]

In all the history of scientific discovery there has never been,

perhaps, so general, rapid, and dramatic an effect wrought on the

scientific centres of Europe as has followed, in the past four weeks,

upon an announcement made to the Wuerzburg Physico-Medical Society, at

their December [1895] meeting, by Professor William Konrad Roentgen,

professor of physics at the Royal University of Wuerzburg. The first news

which reached London was by telegraph from Vienna to the effect that a

Professor Roentgen, until then the possessor of only a local fame in the

town mentioned, had discovered a new kind of light, which penetrated and

photographed through everything. This news was received with a mild

interest, some amusement, and much incredulity; and a week passed. Then,

by mail and telegraph, came daily clear indications of the stir which

the discovery was making in all the great line of universities between

Vienna and Berlin. Then Roentgen's own report arrived, so cool, so

business-like, and so truly scientific in character, that it left no

doubt either of the truth or of the great importance of the preceding

reports. To-day, four weeks after the announcement, Roentgen's name is

apparently in every scientific publication issued this week in Europe;

and accounts of his experiments, of the experiments of others following

his method, and of theories as to the strange new force which he has

been the first to observe, fill pages of every scientific journal that

comes to hand. And before the necessary time elapses for this article to

attain publication in America, it is in all ways probable that the

laboratories and lecture-rooms of the United States will also be giving

full evidence of this contagious arousal of interest over a discovery so

strange that its importance cannot yet be measured, its utility be even

prophesied, or its ultimate effect upon long established scientific

beliefs be even vaguely foretold.

The Roentgen rays are certain invisible rays resembling, in many

respects, rays of light, which are set free when a high-pressure

electric current is discharged through a vacuum tube. A vacuum tube is a

glass tube from which all the air, down to one-millionth of an

atmosphere, has been exhausted after the insertion of a platinum wire in

either end of the tube for connection with the two poles of a battery or

induction coil. When the discharge is sent through the tube, there

proceeds from the anode--that is, the wire which is connected with the

positive pole of the battery--certain bands of light, varying in colour

with the colour of the glass. But these are insignificant in comparison

with the brilliant glow which shoots from the cathode, or negative wire.

This glow excites brilliant phosphorescence in glass and many

substances, and these "cathode rays," as they are called, were observed

and studied by Hertz; and more deeply by his assistant, Professor

Lenard, Lenard having, in 1894, reported that the cathode rays would

penetrate thin films of aluminum, wood, and other substances, and

produce photographic results beyond. It was left, however, for Professor

Roentgen to discover that during the discharge quite other rays are set

free, which differ greatly from those described by Lenard as cathode

rays. The most marked difference between the two is the fact that

Roentgen rays are not deflected by a magnet, indicating a very essential

difference, while their range and penetrative power are incomparably

greater. In fact, all those qualities which have lent a sensational

character to the discovery of Roentgen's rays were mainly absent from

those of Lenard, to the end that, although Roentgen has not been working

in an entirely new field, he has by common accord been freely granted

all the honors of a great discovery.

Exactly what kind of a force Professor Roentgen has discovered he does

not know. As will be seen below, he declines to call it a new kind of

light, or a new form of electricity. He has given it the name of the X

rays. Others speak of it as the Roentgen rays. Thus far its results only,

and not its essence, are known. In the terminology of science it is

generally called "a new mode of motion," or, in other words, a new

force. As to whether it is or not actually a force new to science, or

one of the known forces masquerading under strange conditions, weighty

authorities are already arguing. More than one eminent scientist has

already affected to see in it a key to the great mystery of the law of

gravity. All who have expressed themselves in print have admitted, with

more or less frankness, that, in view of Roentgen's discovery, science

must forthwith revise, possibly to a revolutionary degree, the long

accepted theories concerning the phenomena of light and sound. That the

X rays, in their mode of action, combine a strange resemblance to both

sound and light vibrations, and are destined to materially affect, if

they do not greatly alter, our views of both phenomena, is already

certain; and beyond this is the opening into a new and unknown field of

physical knowledge, concerning which speculation is already eager, and

experimental investigation already in hand, in London, Paris, Berlin,

and, perhaps, to a greater or less extent, in every well-equipped

physical laboratory in Europe.

Little Masterpieces of Science: Invention and Discovery · 第 4 / 10 段