THE SUNDAY SCREW.

This little instrument, remarkable for its curious twist, has been at

work again. A small portion of the collective wisdom of the nation has

affirmed the principle that there must be no collection or delivery of

posted letters on a Sunday. The principle was discussed by something

less than a fourth of the House of Commons, and affirmed by something

less than a seventh.

Having no doubt whatever, that this brilliant victory is, in effect, the

affirmation of the principle that there ought to be No Anything hut

churches and chapels on a Sunday; or, that it is the beginning of a

Sabbatarian Crusade, outrageous to the spirit of Christianity,

irreconcileable with the health, the rational enjoyments, and the true

religious feeling, of the community; and certain to result, if

successful, in a violent reaction, threatening contempt and hatred of

that seventh day which it is a great religious and social object to

maintain in the popular affection; it would ill become us to be deterred

from speaking out upon the subject, by any fear of being misunderstood,

or by any certainty of being misrepresented.

Confident in the sense of the country, and not unacquainted with the

habits and exigencies of the people, we approach the Sunday question,

quite undiscomposed by the late storm of mad mis-statement and all

uncharitableness, which cleared the way for Lord Ashley’s motion. The

preparation may be likened to that which is usually described in the

case of the Egyptian Sorcerer and the boy who has some dark liquid

poured into the palm of his hand, which is presently to become a magic

mirror. “Look for Lord Ashley. What do you see?” “Oh, here’s some one

with a broom!” “Well! what is he doing?” “Oh, he’s sweeping away Mr.

Rowland Hill! Now, there is a great crowd; of people all sweeping Mr.

Rowland Hill away; and now, there is a red flag with Intolerance on it;

and now, they are pitching a great many Tents called Meetings. Now, the

tents are all upset, and Mr. Rowland Hill has swept everybody else away.

And oh! _now_, here’s Lord Ashley, with a Resolution in his hand!”

One Christian sentence is all-sufficient with us, on the theological

part of this subject. “The Sabbath was made for man, and not man for the

Sabbath.” No amount of signatures to petitions can ever sign away the

meaning of those words; no end of volumes of Hansard’s Parliamentary

Debates can ever affect them in the least. Move and carry resolutions,

bring in bills, have committees, upstairs, downstairs, and in my lady’s

chamber; read a first time, read a second time, read a third time, read

thirty thousand times; the declared authority of the Christian

dispensation over the letter of the Jewish Law, particularly in this

especial instance, cannot be petitioned, resolved, read, or committee’d

away.

It is important in such a case as this affirmation of a principle, to

know what amount of practical sense and logic entered into its

assertion. We will inquire.

Lord Ashley (who has done much good, and whom we mention with every

sentiment of sincere respect, though we believe him to be most

mischievously deluded on this question,) speaks of the people employed

in the Country Post-Offices on Sunday, as though they were continually

at work, all the livelong day. He asks whether they are to be “a Pariah

race, excluded from the enjoyments of the rest of the community?” He

presents to our mind’s eye, rows of Post-Office clerks, sitting, with

dishevelled hair and dirty linen, behind small shutters, all Sunday

long, keeping time with their sighs to the ringing of the church bells,

and watering bushels of letters, incessantly passing through their

hands, with their tears. Is this exactly the reality? The Upas tree is a

figure of speech almost as ancient as our lachrymose friend the Pariah,

in whom most of us recognise a respectable old acquaintance. Supposing

we were to take it into our heads to declare in these Household Words,

that every Post-Office clerk employed on Sunday in the country, is

compelled to sit under his own particular sprig of Upas, planted in a

flower-pot beside him for the express purpose of blighting him with its

baneful shade, should we be much more beyond the mark than Lord Ashley

himself? Did any of our readers ever happen to post letters in the

Country on a Sunday? Did they ever see a notice outside a provincial

Post-Office, to the effect that the presiding Pariah would be in

attendance at such an hour on Sunday, and not before? Did they ever wait

for the Pariah, at some inconvenience, until the hour arrived, and

observe him come to the office in an extremely spruce condition as to

his shirt collar, and do a little sprinkling of business in a very easy

offhand manner? We have such recollections ourselves. We have posted and

received letters in most parts of this kingdom on a Sunday, and we never

yet observed the Pariah to be quite crushed. On the contrary, we have

seen him at church, apparently in the best health and spirits

(notwithstanding an hour or so of sorting, earlier in the morning), and

we have met him out a-walking with the young lady to whom he is engaged,

and we have known him meet her again with her cousin, after the dispatch

of the Mails, and really conduct himself as if he were not particularly

exhausted or afflicted. Indeed, how _could_ he be so, on Lord Ashley’s

own showing? There is a Saturday before the Sunday. We are a people

indisposed, he says, to business on a Sunday. More than a million of

people are known, from their petitions, to be too scrupulous to hear of

such a thing. Few counting-houses or offices are ever opened on a

Sunday. The Merchants and Bankers write by Saturday night’s post. The

Sunday night’s post may be presumed to be chiefly limited to letters of

necessity and emergency. Lord Ashley’s whole case would break down, if

it were probable that the Post-Office Pariah had half as much

confinement on Sunday, as the He-Pariah who opens my Lord’s street-door

when any body knocks, or the She-Pariah who nurses my Lady’s baby.

If the London Post-Office be not opened on a Sunday, says Lord Ashley,

why should the Post-Offices of provincial towns be opened on a Sunday?

Precisely because the provincial towns are NOT London, we apprehend.

Because London is the great capital, mart, and business-centre of the

world; because in London there are hundreds of thousands of people,

young and old, away from their families and friends; because the

stoppage of the Monday’s Post Delivery in London would stop, for many

precious hours, the natural flow of the blood from every vein and artery

in the world to the heart of the world, and its return from the heart

through all those tributary channels. Because the broad difference

between London and every other place in England, necessitated this

distinction, and has perpetuated it.

But, to say nothing of petitioners elsewhere, it seems that two hundred

merchants and bankers in Liverpool “formed themselves into a committee,

to forward the object of this motion.” In the name of all the Pharisees

of Jerusalem, could not the two hundred merchants and bankers form

themselves into a committee to write or read no business-letters

themselves on a Sunday—and let the Post-Office alone? The Government

establishes a monopoly in the Post-Office, and makes it not only

difficult and expensive for me to send a letter by any other means, but

illegal. What right has any merchant or banker to stop the course of any

letter that I may have sore necessity to post, or may choose to post? If

any one of the two hundred merchants and bankers lay at the point of

death, on Sunday, would he desire his absent child to be written to—the

Sunday Post being yet in existence? And how do they take upon themselves

to tell us that the Sunday Post is not a “necessity,” when they know,

every man of them, every Sunday morning, that before the clock strikes

next, they and theirs may be visited by any one of incalculable millions

of accidents, to make it a dire need? Not a necessity? Is it possible

that these merchants and bankers suppose there is any Sunday Post, from

any large town, which is not a very agony of necessity to some one? I

might as well say, in my pride of strength, that a knowledge of

bone-setting in surgeons is not a necessity, because I have not broken

my leg.

There is a Sage of this sort in the House of Commons. He is of opinion

that the Sunday Police is a necessity, but the Sunday Post is not. That

is to say, in a certain house in London or Westminster, there are

certain silver spoons, engraved with the family crest—a Bigot

rampant—which would be pretty sure to disappear, on an early Sunday, if

there were no Policemen on duty; whereas the Sage sees no present

probability of his requiring to write a letter into the country on a

Saturday night—and, if it should arise, he can use the Electric

Telegraph. Such is the sordid balance some professing Heathens hold of

their own pounds against other men’s pennies, and their own selfish

wants against those of the community at large! Even the Member for

Birmingham, of all the towns in England, is afflicted by this selfish

blindness, and, because _he_ is “tired of reading and answering letters

on a Sunday,” cannot conceive the possibility of there being other

people not so situated, to whom the Sunday Post may, under many

circumstances, be an unspeakable blessing.

The inconsequential nature of Lord Ashley’s positions, cannot be better

shown, than by one brief passage from his speech. “When he said the

transmission of the Mail, he meant the Mail-bags; he did not propose to

interfere with the passengers.” No? Think again, Lord Ashley.

When the Honorable Member for Whitened Sepulchres moves his resolution

for the stoppage of Mail Trains—in a word, of all Railway travelling—on

Sunday; and when that Honorable Gentleman talks about the Pariah clerks

who take the money and give the tickets, the Pariah engine-drivers, the

Pariah stokers, the Pariah porters, the Pariah police along the line,

and the Pariah flys waiting at the Pariah stations to take the Pariah

passengers, to be attended by Pariah servants at the Pariah Arms and

other Pariah Hotels; what will Lord Ashley do then? Envy insinuated that

Tom Thumb made his giants first, and then killed them, but you cannot do

the like by your Pariahs. You cannot get an exclusive patent for the

manufacture and destruction of Pariah dolls. Other Honorable Gentlemen

are certain to engage in the trade; and when the Honorable Member for

Whitened Sepulchres makes _his_ Pariahs of all these people, you cannot

refuse to recognise them as being of the genuine sort, Lord Ashley.

Railway and all other Sunday Travelling, suppressed, by the Honorable

Member for Whitened Sepulchres, the same honorable gentleman, who will

not have been particularly complimented in the course of that

achievement by the Times Newspaper, will discover that a good deal is

done towards the Times of Monday, on a Sunday night, and will Pariah the

whole of that immense establishment. For, this is the great

inconvenience of Pariah-making, that when you begin, they spring up like

mushrooms: insomuch, that it is very doubtful whether we shall have a

house in all this land, from the Queen’s Palace downward, which will not

be found, on inspection, to be swarming with Pariahs. Not touch the

Mails, and yet abolish the Mail-bags? Stop all those silent messengers

of affection and anxiety, yet let the talking traveller, who is the

cause of infinitely more employment, go? Why, this were to suppose all

men Fools, and the Honorable Member for Whitened Sepulchres even a

greater Noodle than he is!

Lord Ashley supports his motion by reading some perilous bombast, said

to be written by a working man—of whom the intelligent body of working

men have no great reason, to our thinking, to be proud—in which there is

much about not being robbed of the boon of the day of rest; but, with

all Lord Ashley’s indisputably humane and benevolent impulses, we grieve

to say we know no robber whom the working man, really desirous to

preserve his Sunday, has so much to dread, as Lord Ashley himself. He is

weakly lending the influence of his good intentions to a movement which

would make that day no day of rest—rest to those who are overwrought,

includes recreation, fresh air, change—but a day of mortification and

gloom. And this not to one class only, be it understood. This is not a

class question. If there be no gentleman of spirit in the House of

Commons to remind Lord Ashley that the high-flown nonsense he quoted,

concerning labour, is but another form of the stupidest socialist dogma,

which seeks to represent that there is only one class of laborers on

earth, it is well that the truth should be stated somewhere. And it is,

indisputably, that three-fourths of us are laborers who work hard for

our living; and that the condition of what we call the working man, has

its parallel, at a remove of certain degrees, in almost all professions

and pursuits. Running through the middle classes, is a broad deep vein

of constant, compulsory, indispensable work. There are innumerable

gentlemen, and sons and daughters of gentlemen, constantly at work, who

have no more hope of making fortunes in their vocation, than the working

man has in his. There are innumerable families in which the day of rest,

is the only day out of the seven, where innocent domestic recreations

and enjoyments are very feasible. In our mean gentility, which is the

cause of so much social mischief, we may try to separate ourselves, as

to this question, from the working man; and may very complacently

resolve that there is no occasion for his excursion-trains and

tea-gardens, because we don’t use them; but we had better not deceive

ourselves. It is impossible that we can cramp his means of needful

recreation and refreshment, without cramping our own, or basely cheating

him. We cannot leave him to the Christian patronage of the Honourable

Member for Whitened Sepulchres, and take ourselves off. We cannot

restrain him and leave ourselves free. Our Sunday wants are pretty much

the same as his, though his are far more easily satisfied; our

inclinations and our feelings are pretty much the same; and it will be

no less wise than honest in us, the middle classes, not to be

Janus-faced about the matter.

What is it that the Honorable Member for Whitened Sepulchres, for whom

Lord Ashley clears the way, wants to do? He sees on a Sunday morning, in

the large towns of England, when the bells are ringing for church and

chapel, certain unwashed, dim-eyed, dissipated loungers, hanging about

the doors of public-houses, and loitering at the street corners, to whom

the day of rest appeals in much the same degree as a sunny summer-day

does to so many pigs. Does he believe that any weight of handcuffs on

the Post-Office, or any amount of restriction imposed on decent people,

will bring Sunday home to these? Let him go, any Sunday morning, from

the new Town of Edinburgh where the sound of a piano would be

profanation, to the old Town, and see what Sunday is in the Canongate.

Or let him get up some statistics of the drunken people in Glasgow,

while the churches are full—and work out the amount of Sabbath

observance which is carried downward, by rigid shows and sad-colored

forms.

But, there is another class of people, those who take little jaunts, and

mingle in social little assemblages, on a Sunday, concerning whom the

whole constituency of Whitened Sepulchres, with their Honorable Member

in the chair, find their lank hair standing on end with horror, and

pointing, as if they were all electrified, straight up to the skylights

of Exeter Hall. In reference to this class, we would whisper in the ears

of the disturbed assemblage, three short words, “Let well alone!”

The English people have long been remarkable for their domestic habits,

and their household virtues and affections. They are, now, beginning to

be universally respected by intelligent foreigners who visit this

country, for their unobtrusive politeness, their good-humour, and their

cheerful recognition of all restraints that really originate in

consideration for the general good. They deserve this testimony (which

we have often heard, of late, with pride) most honorably. Long maligned

and mistrusted, they proved their case from the very first moment of

having it in their power to do so; and have never, on any single

occasion within our knowledge, abused any public confidence that has

been reposed in them. It is an extraordinary thing to know of a people,

systematically excluded from galleries and museums for years, that their

respect for such places, and for themselves as visitors to them, dates,

without any period of transition, from the very day when their doors

were freely opened. The national vices are surprisingly few. The people

in general are not gluttons, nor drunkards, nor gamblers, nor addicted

to cruel sports, nor to the pushing of any amusement to furious and wild

extremes. They are moderate, and easily pleased, and very sensible to

all affectionate influences. Any knot of holiday-makers, without a large

proportion of women and children among them, would be a perfect

phenomenon. Let us go into any place of Sunday enjoyment where any fair

representation of the people resort, and we shall find them decent,

orderly, quiet, sociable among their families and neighbours. There is a

general feeling of respect for religion, and for religious observances.

The churches and chapels are well filled. Very few people who keep

servants or apprentices, leave out of consideration their opportunities

of attending church or chapel; the general demeanour within those

edifices, is particularly grave and decorous; and the general

recreations without, are of a harmless and simple kind. Lord Brougham

never did Henry Brougham more justice, than in declaring to the House of

Lords, after the success of this motion in the House of Commons, that

there is no country where the Sabbath is, on the whole, better observed

than in England. Let the constituency of Whitened Sepulchres ponder, in

a Christian spirit, on these things; take care of their own consciences;

leave their Honorable Member to take care of his; and let well alone.

For, it is in nations as in families. Too tight a hand in these

respects, is certain to engender a disposition to break loose, and to

run riot. If the private experience of any reader, pausing on this

sentence, cannot furnish many unhappy illustrations of its truth, it is

a very fortunate experience indeed. Our most notable public example of

it, in England, is just two hundred years old.

Lord Ashley had better merge his Pariahs into the body politic; and the

Honorable Member for Whitened Sepulchres had better accustom his

jaundiced eyes to the Sunday sight of dwellers in towns, roaming in

green fields, and gazing upon country prospects. If he will look a

little beyond them, and lift up the eyes of his mind, perhaps he may

observe a mild, majestic figure in the distance, going through a field

of corn, attended by some common men who pluck the grain as they pass

along, and whom their Divine Master teaches that he is the Lord, even of

the Sabbath-Day.

Household Words, No. 13, June 22, 1850 · 第 3 / 20 题