Material and labor costs are accurately determined. The value of

material drawn for all purposes, as shown by the report in Fig. 9, is

credited to material purchase accounts, and these accounts are checked

against the storeroom records. Reports of supplies drawn are handled in

the same manner. The labor report, Fig. 12, covers all labor charges

and must agree with the pay─roll for the period covered.

In the distribution of expense, however, there are many opportunities

for error. While the total expense to be charged against the factory

for a given period is accurately determined, the amount is not known

until the end of the period. This is represented by the amounts charged

to the different expense distribution accounts. In the meantime, to

determine the cost of individual jobs, it is necessary to apportion

expense on a percentage basis, as explained in the discussion of that

subject. Since that ratio for the current period is unknown, it is

necessary to assume that the actual ratio for the preceding period

still is correct; therefore, that ratio is used in figuring the cost

of all jobs. It is only when the expense distribution for the current

period is made on the general books and the true ratio determined,

that discrepancies, if any, are discovered. Unless the distribution is

accurate, the resulting ratio will be incorrect.

[Illustration: GENERAL OFFICES OF THE PLATT IRON WORKS, DAYTON, OHIO]

Formerly, it was the custom to base the expense ratio on the actual

figure for the preceding year, which meant that changes in expense

ratio were not taken into account for an entire year. As a result, the

total manufacturing cost shown by the books at the end of the year,

did not agree with the costs as figured in the cost department; it was

usually much higher.

By operating the controlling accounts, making accurate distributions

of expense, the period can be limited to one month. Discrepancies

are then quickly discovered and the necessary adjustment made in the

expense ratio used. If it is found, at the end of the month that the

true ratio of expense is higher or lower than for the preceding month,

the percentage to be used for the next month is raised or lowered

accordingly. With a careful distribution of the expense items each

month, the variations in the ratio should be very slight.

The objection is sometimes made that a monthly distribution of expense

is inequitable──that certain expenses may be abnormally high in some

months and below the average in others. But with proper controlling

accounts, this objection ceases to be serious. Certain expenses are

paid in one month that should be distributed over an entire year──as

taxes, insurance, and repairs. The amounts charged to the expense

distribution accounts each month, are only the amounts that should be

apportioned to that month. Taking taxes as an example, one─twelfth of

the entire amount should be charged each month.

As an example of adjusting entries for controlling accounts, journal

pages are illustrated, in Fig. 21, containing entries made at the

end of the month──with explanations. It will be noted that the last

entry is a charge to _manufactured goods_ account, and a credit to

_manufacturing_ account of the total cost of finished goods, as shown

in the report, Fig. 20.

This account, _manufactured goods_, occupies the same position as a

purchase account. It represents the cost of finished goods to the

commercial division of the business. To this cost must be added an

amount sufficient to cover selling expense and provide a profit, as is

done when goods are purchased for resale. Selling expense should not

be included in the cost department's figures; nothing should be added

to the actual cost of manufacture, unless it is desired to add a small

amount to provide a factory profit.

[Illustration: Fig. 22. Journal Showing Adjusting Entries]

[Illustration: Fig. 23. Journal Showing Adjusting Entries]

_Manufacturing_ account has been charged for the cost of

manufacture──material, labor, and expense──and credited with the cost

of finished goods. This does not close the account, however, because

all jobs started have not been finished, as there still is work in

process. The _balance_ of the manufacturing account, then, represents

the cost of this work and should agree with an actual inventory of work

in process.

No attempt has been made to describe a cost system for a particular

business──principles only have been considered in this discussion.

Proper application of these principles, however, will result in a

practical system for any manufacturing business. The exact manner of

applying these principles──the detail──depends on the nature of the

business; the results desired are the same in all lines. Physical

conditions, nature of the product, the policy of the management, the

manner in which the business is conducted──all of these factors must

be studied and given due consideration in outlining the system. Then

the most simple system that will produce results is best, but in the

effort to make the system simple, _necessary_ details should not be

overlooked. It must be remembered that in a comparison of details of

cost, increases are more quickly located than if the comparison refers

to finished work.

[Illustration: PART OF THE INTERIOR OF THE GENERAL STORES OF THE SANTA

FE AT TOPEKA Showing Arrangement of Racks and Shelving for Holding

Materials, and Longitudinal Disposition of the Bins Enabling the

Foreman, from His Office at the End, to Command a View of the Whole

Floor. Courtesy of the Engineering Magazine.]

MACHINE SHOP MANAGEMENT

MANUFACTURING

=Manufacturing Conditions and Developments.= Millions of dollars are

annually spent in building new factories. Other millions are spent in

equipping them with the best machinery that trained and experienced men

have been able to devise. Still more millions of money are annually

paid to the officials who manage and the employees who man these

enormous manufacturing plants.

Why? Why could not these expert employees labor in their own homes or

their individual shops, and produce the manufactured goods without all

these enormous expenses? What are the necessities which impel men to

spend these vast sums of money in erecting, equipping, and operating

these immense plants?

Casually considering the question, the _factory_ or _manufacturing

plant_ does not seem to be a real necessity. A large force of employees

working under a single management does not seem to be the most

economical method of producing the desired goods. Certainly every man

is free to choose his own particular line of work; and there are many

persons who, seeing a large force of employees giving their entire life

work to the enrichment of successful manufacturers, while the employees

themselves work long hours at hard and laborious tasks and fare so

poorly that they are seldom enabled to save any considerable portion of

their wages, not infrequently ending an industrious life in poverty and

want, are led to believe that the factory is not a necessity or even

a benefit to mankind, but rather a means for reducing the individual

worker to a condition of grinding servitude, voluntary perhaps, but

often the result of dire necessity.

These people, considering all the hardships in the life of factory

employees, are likely to hold and often to express the opinion that

the highest welfare of the human race really demands a return to the

simpler life of early days, when a much larger proportion of the people

lived upon farms, producing their own provisions, raising the flax and

the wool wherewith they clothed themselves, quite independently of the

wealthy classes, whether bankers, capitalists, or manufacturers, the

factory as we know it to─day having hardly begun its marvelous era of

existence.

Let us consider for a moment how all this has come about. In the

earlier years of the independence of this country, the chief dependence

was upon the results of agricultural work. In due time the development

of the resources of the country has placed manufacturers at the front,

so that in very recent years the value of manufactured products has

become nearly double that of agricultural.

These results, like many others of a less notable character, commenced

from very small beginnings; and it has been by inborn mechanical

ability, remarkable ingenuity, patient development, and tireless

energy, that mechanical undertakings have been developed from meager

initial facilities, until, in the vast manufacturing enterprises of the

present day, the American mechanic in nearly all lines leads the world

in originality and practical achievement.

=Early New England Mechanics.= When the early settlers of New England

labored under the restrictive and harassing laws of the Mother

Country, and under their administration were goaded and exasperated

beyond endurance in many ways, not the least of which was that of

being obliged to purchase many manufactured articles from England at

extortionate prices──or, if purchased from other countries, still

paying taxes to England for the privilege──they rebelled. Determining

to buy no more foreign goods, they set out, at first in most clumsy and

primitive fashion, to make for themselves such articles as were really

necessaries, and, in noble self─denial, to live without those which

they could not make for themselves. They doubtless little realized,

however, that they were thereby laying the foundations of the greatest

manufacturing country in the world. By the principles thus inaugurated,

they instituted the first industrial _boycott_ in the history of

the country──the one that has had more important and far─reaching

influences than anything of the kind before or since.

=Industrial Freedom.= While the departure of the Pilgrims for this

country, and the making of their homes on the "stern and rock─bound

coast" of New England, were for the purpose of seeking religious

freedom, it is also true that freedom soon meant very much more than

this to them; and with a larger conception of their opportunities

and possibilities, some of which were in reality forced upon them

by adverse circumstances, there came to them the inspiration of

_industrial_ as well as _religious freedom_. The world has seen and

has given them due credit for the determined and heroic manner in

which they went about their self─appointed task; and they have amply

demonstrated to posterity their appreciation of and grasp upon the

possibilities and conditions, and the breadth and nobility of character

which they exhibited in working out the many perplexing problems that

confronted them.

=Development of American Industrial Enterprises.= American

manufacturing came into being with these small beginnings and crude

efforts to fashion those common objects of household necessity and

daily use, which, although crude and clumsy, yet answered the purpose

until supplanted later by those of more improved form and workmanship.

These primitive successes led to greater endeavors, and developed into

still broader usefulness, when the time came that necessities had been

provided for and luxuries were now demanded by the higher plane of

living to which the people had in due time advanced.

Thus the crude beginnings and rude surroundings among which the early

American mechanic performed his work, were in his own house. Soon he

outgrew these primitive facilities, and built small shops, frequently

in the garden or back yard of his home. These gradually enlarged.

The development of the business demanded increased facilities, and

buildings were erected quite independent of the home surroundings,

and two or more men were associated as manufacturers. These plants

developed and enlarged, and in due course of time became the machine

shops and the factories, which have since multiplied many hundreds

of times, not only in number and in value, but in influence and

importance, until to─day our country stands the foremost manufacturing

nation of the world. This is true, not only as to the volume and value

of her manufactured productions, but also as to their great range and

diversity of kind and usefulness. One by one the American mechanic

has taken up the various classes of work formerly monopolized by this

country or that, failing perhaps at first, but always progressing

and developing, until, by native ingenuity and unflagging energy,

all obstacles have been overcome, all difficulties put aside, new

industries have come into being, and other "victories" of peace "no

less than those of war" have been added to the laurels of the American

mechanic and of his ever─ready and ever─confident partner, the American

manufacturer and capitalist. It is to this combination, each confident

of and faithful to the abilities and honor of the other, and each

acting his part in his own sphere of usefulness, that the immense

success of American manufacturing is due.

The factories of to─day are the logical results of a natural growth

and development of the various branches of business for which they

were originally built and organized. As the buildings increased in

numbers and dimensions, the methods of construction, the equipment, and

the systems by which they were managed, developed methods of greater

economy and efficiency.

=Tools of the Early Mechanic.= The early mechanic had few tools and

appliances wherewith to perform his work; and these were crude and

primitive, consisting principally of a limited number of hand─tools

brought from the Old Country, and occasionally a hand─lathe of modern

dimensions and operated by foot─power. But with their few tools and

meager facilities, and animated by the condition that "necessity is

the mother of invention," these old─time mechanics proceeded with

practical common sense and ingenuity to design and construct better

tools and machines──which have continually developed, until we have the

splendid array of manufacturing machinery seen on every hand to─day.

As machinery developed, larger and larger amounts of money had to be

expended; and the banker had to be called upon to provide it. Thus the

capitalist became the partner of the manufacturer, the one furnishing

the mechanical ability and inventive genius for the actual designing

and building of machinery and manufactured goods, while the other

contributed the money to carry on the work, and the business ability

necessary to market the product.

=Relations of Capital and Labor.= In brief, this is the condition

to─day. But, says the carping critic, "there are often hundreds

of struggling and hard─working employees where there is one rich

manufacturer." This may be partly true, although it is a fact

beyond dispute that the American mechanic is the best paid workman

in the world. It is true that there are hundreds of workmen to one

capitalist. Why? The Creator has so ordained that there shall be many

of moderate ability, and but few possessing the unusual ability and

talent to lead them. So it has ever been since the days of Moses, and

so it probably will ever continue to be. Doestick's regiment composed

entirely of colonels was a manifest absurdity, and so intended as an

illustration of a well─known and natural condition that should be

realized by every reasonable and thoughtful man who considers these

questions.

Considering carefully the great scheme of manufacturing, and the

immense industrial problem of supplying the wants of the people of

this great country and providing for the vast volume of trade that

goes abroad, by the modern manufacturing plants equipped with all that

is latest and best in machinery for every conceivable purpose, it

should not be forgotten that, as the very basis and foundation of the

whole, stands the modern _machine tool_, and that it is principally

to the great and important development of this that we owe primarily

our industrial growth and prosperity as a manufacturing nation. To the

machine tool may easily be traced the gradual but continued upward

tendency of the mechanic and his methods, from the hard physical toil

and small pay of the early days, to the immeasurably lighter exertion

and increased compensation made possible by the highly developed

condition of the automatic machines of the present day. It has been

an oft─repeated victory of "mind over matter," wherein _brains_ have

won where _hands_ made but little advance; _ideas_ have developed

wonderful mechanisms that have revolutionized the earlier methods of

manufacturing and raised the standard of mechanical excellence beyond

what was thought possible years ago, and at the same time reduced the

cost to a fraction of its former amount.

Here, again, the capitalist furnished the means whereby the practical

realization of the ingenious designs of the mechanic's fertile brain

became possible, and the successful combination of capital and labor

brought success to both.

=Combinations of Capital.= But here comes our critical labor agitator

again with the comment: "It is all very well to talk about the amicable

relations of capital and labor, and how each ought to help the other,

but how about the great combinations of capital that we ordinarily

call "trusts"? To give a correct and intelligent, as well as a fair

and truthful answer to this question, we must know the _conditions_

under which the combination is formed, the _plan_ upon which it is

organized, and the _object_ of its formation. As these are not given,

we must assume the conditions of some well─known combination. Let it be

the United States Steel Corporation. One of the foremost men in this

combination has defined his position on the subject, and in so doing

has outlined the policy of the corporation, by saying:

"Any combination of capital which operates, _first_, to prevent

competition; _second_, to increase the price of the product; and

_third_, to reduce the wages of the workmen, is working under a trio

of wrong principles that sooner or later will bring about disaster."

Let us see how the actual operation of this combination of capital

really works out in practice.

_First_──The Steel Corporation has never sought to prevent

competition. Steel mills, large and small, have operated when, where,

and how they pleased, with no interference from the Steel Corporation.

_Second_──The price of steel has not been increased; on the contrary,

it has been greatly reduced under its management. Thirty years ago a

very indifferent quality of machine steel cost from 8 to 12 cents per

pound. To─day ordinary machine steel of a much better quality than

that mentioned above can be had for 2 cents a pound or less.

_Third_──The wages of workmen have not only not been reduced, but have

actually been doubled since the labor troubles in the steel mills

known as the "Homestead Strike" (1892). The Steel Corporation has

gone much further than to double the wages of the steel workers. They

have made it possible for the workmen to become partners in the great

work of the corporation, by obligating themselves to sell to their

workmen a certain amount each year of stock in the corporation, so

that the men who labor in the mills may also become part owners and

participate in the dividends resulting from their work on exactly the

same percentage as the capitalist himself does.

Our critic comes back to the charge by saying that "the Steel

Corporation has bought up many steel plants in various parts of the

country, and added them to its already enormous properties." Quite

true. And for what purpose? Let us see what they do with these plants.

How do they manage this part of the business? What is their plan of

working? The conditions were these: Before the advent of the United

States Steel Corporation, there were many isolated steel manufacturing

plants, each being equipped for the making of a number of kinds of

steel products──for instance, steel railroad rails, structural steel,

merchant bar steel, steel boiler─plates, steel tank─plates, and so

on. The equipment necessary for producing these different forms of

steel was very expensive; and inasmuch as a considerable portion of

this equipment for some particular kind of product would necessarily

be idle on account of the fluctuations of trade, the expense burden

was abnormally high on account of this idle equipment. How has this

condition been handled by the Steel Corporation? This has been the

plan: Suppose they have purchased five plants, each making the

five classes of product indicated above, and working under the

disadvantages of a variety of products. These plants are examined,

and inventories made of their equipments. It is then decided which

mill is best adapted for making each one of the five classes of

products. Then there is a redistribution of the equipment of the

plants, placing in the plant selected for it all that in the several

plants is adapted to a certain product; removing all the machinery

from this plant that is not adapted to the particular product to be

turned out, to be distributed among the other plants according to the

particular class of products for which each one is designed. Thus

each plant is equipped to turn out the single class of product which

is most appropriate for it, by drawing upon the other plants for such

machinery as they have which may supplement its own in this line.

By this plan, each plant makes but one class of product. Having the

best machinery from all the plants for this purpose, and concentrating

its energies on a single class, it is enabled not only to turn out a

better product, but to turn it out much more economically than before.

As the workmen become more expert on their single line of product,

they work more efficiently and consequently earn higher wages.

All these conditions, producing an economical output, enable the

manufacturers to reduce the selling price.

The conditions of economy brought about in the management of the

manufacturing operations and in marketing the product, are very

marked when a large number of plants operate under one general head.

Again, with the immense amount of capital at the disposal of such a

corporation, it is enabled to secure the services of the best experts,

and the most valuable processes in existence.

There are many other advantages, not only to the corporation and its

employees, but to the users of its products, and so to the general

public, when a combination of capital is _honestly made and honestly

administered_.

=Betterment of Industrial Conditions.= What has been said of the Steel

Corporation as to favoring of employees, has been duplicated in various

ways by different manufacturers all over the country. Factory sites

have been beautified by landscape gardening, and trees and shrubbery

have made the surroundings of working men and women pleasant and

attractive. Land has been purchased, and workingmen's homes built

and rented to them at fair rates. Factory dining rooms are provided;

reading rooms, libraries, gymnasiums, clubs, and social organizations

are inaugurated; emergency hospitals or "first aid" rooms are arranged,

with all or nearly all these services free except that provided in

dining rooms, which is furnished at actual cost. More recently, a firm

in Connecticut announces that it will furnish free medical attendance

to all its employees and their families.

Schools have been established for apprentices, wherein they receive

such technical instruction as may be necessary to their success in

the trade they are learning──and this, not only without expense to

themselves or to their parents, but they are paid by the hour for time

spent in their school work, the same as for their time in the shop.

To foster a practical interest in the work of the shops, many concerns

have what is called the _Suggestion System_, whereby the employees may

make written suggestions of any improvements which they desire as to

shop methods and routine, the design and construction of the product,

and many kindred subjects, the best suggestions made each month

receiving prizes.

All of these matters emphasize the fact that the mutual interests of

the capitalist who manufactures and sells, and of the employee by the

efforts of whose hand and brain the products are being turned out, are

each year being recognized and in a very large majority of cases are

being acted upon in good faith.

Cyclopedia of Commerce, Accountancy, Business Administration, v. 02 (of 10) · 第 12 / 23 段