WHAT KING ALBERT DID FOR KINGSHIP

But there were flashes of almost divine light in the black darkness

of Belgium’s tragedy, and perhaps the brightest of them surrounded the

person of her King. What King Albert did in those dark days of August

1914, to keep the soul of his nation alive in the midst of the immense

sorrow of her utter overthrow his nation alone can fully know. But we

who are not Belgians were thrilled again and again by the inspired tones

of a great Spirit speaking to his subjects with that authority, dignity,

and courage which alone among free nations are sufficient to unite the

people to the Throne.

“A country which defends its liberties in the face of tyranny commands

the respect of all. Such a country does not perish.” What King Albert

did for Belgium in the stand he made against German aggression is partly

known already, and will leave its record in history, but what he did

at the same time for kingship throughout the world, as well as in his

country, can only be realized by the few who are aware that almost

at the moment of the outbreak of war the Belgian Courts (much to the

unmerited humiliation of Belgium) were on the eve of such disclosures

in relation to the life and death of the King’s predecessor as would

certainly have shaken the credit of monarchy for centuries.

Nobody who ever met the late King Leopold could have had any doubt that

he was a great man, if greatness can be separated from goodness and

measured solely by energy of intellect and character. I see him now as

I saw him in a garden of a house on the Riviera, the huge, unwieldy

creature, with the eyes of an eagle, the voice of a bull and the flat

tread of an elephant, and I recall the thought with which I came away:

“Thank God that man is only the King of a little country! If he had been

the sovereign of a great State he would have become the scourge of the

world.”

After King Leopold’s death, accident brought me knowledge of astounding

facts of his last days which were shortly to be exposed in Court--of

the measure of his unnatural hatred of his children; of his schemes

to deprive them of their rightful inheritance; of his relations with

certain of his favourites and his death-bed marriage to one of them;

of the circumstances attending the surgical operation which immediately

preceded the extinction of his life; of the burning of endless documents

of doubtful credit during the night before the knife was used; of the

intrigues of women of questionable character over the dying man’s body

to share the ill-got gold he had earned in the Congo, and finally of his

end, not in his palace, but in a little hidden chalet, alone save for

one scheming woman and one calculating priest. What a story it was,

whether true or false, or (as is most probable) partly true and partly

false, of shame, greed, lust, and life-long duplicity! And all this dark

tale was (one way or other) to be told in the cold light of open

Court, to the general discredit of monarchy, by showing the world how

contemptible may be some of the creatures who control the destinies of

mankind.

But the war and King Albert’s part in it saved Belgium from that

unmerited obloquy. The modest, retiring, studious, almost shy but heroic

young sovereign who, with his valiant little band, is fighting by the

side of our own king’s soldiers, and the soldiers of the Republic of

France, has sustained the highest traditions of kingship. He may have

lost his country at the hands of a great Power, drunk with pride, but he

has won Immortality. He may have no more land left to him than his tent

is pitched upon, but his spiritual empire is as wide as the world. He

may be a king without a kingdom, but he still reigns over a kingdom of

souls.

“WHY SHOULDN’T THEY, SINCE THEY WERE ENGLISHMEN?”

The next flash as of lightning that revealed to us the progress of the

drama of the past 365 days came at the end of the first month of the war

with the terrible story of Mons. That touched us yet more closely than

the tragedy of Belgium, for it seemed at first to be our own tragedy.

Between the departure of an army and the first news of victory or defeat

there is always a time of exhausting suspense. At what moment our first

Expeditionary Force had left England no one quite knew, but after we

learned that it had landed in France we waited with anxious hearts and

listened with strained ears.

We heard the tramp of the gigantic German army, pouring through the

streets of Brussels, fully equipped down to its kitchens, its

smoking coffee-wagons, its corps of gravediggers, and, of course, its

cuirassiers in burnished helmets that were shining in the autumn sun.

The huge, interminable, apparently irresistible multitude! Regiment

after regiment, battalion after battalion, going on and on for hours,

and even days--the mighty legions of the nation that a few days before

had “never so much as dreamt” of war!

At last we had news of our men. Against overwhelming odds they had

fought like heroes--why shouldn’t they, since they were Englishmen?--but

had been compelled to fall back at length, and were now retreating

rapidly, some reports said flying in confusion, broken and done. What?

Was it possible? Our army thrown back in disorder? Our first army, too,

the flower of the fighting men of the world? It was too monstrous, too

awful!

The news was cruelly, and even wickedly, exaggerated, but nevertheless

it did us good. He knows the British character very imperfectly who does

not see that the qualities in which it is unsurpassed among the races

of mankind are those with which it meets adversity and confronts the

darkest night. Within a few days of the report that our soldiers were

falling back from Mons, the old cry “Your King and country need you”

went through the land with a new thrill, and hundreds of thousands of

free men leapt to the relief of the flag.

There has been nothing like it in the history of any nation. And it is

hard to say which is the more moving manifestation of that moment in the

great drama of the war--the spontaneous response of the poor who sprang

forward to defend their country, though they had no more material

property in it than the right to as much of its soil as would make their

graves, or the splendid reply of the rich whose lands were an agelong

possession, and often the foundation of their titles and honours.

“BUT LIBERTY MUST GO ON, AND... ENGLAND.”

What startling surprises! We of the lower, the middle, or the

upper-middle classes had come to believe that too many of the young men

of our nobility had grown effeminate in idleness and selfish pleasure

indulged in on the borderland of a kind of aristocratic Bohemia, but,

behold! they were fighting and dying with the bravest. We had thought

too many of their young women (as thoughtless and capricious creatures

of fashion) had sacrificed the finest bloom of modest and courageous

womanhood in luxury and self-indulgence; but, lo! they were hurrying

to the battlefields as nurses, and there facing without flinching the

scenes of blood and horror, of foul sights and stenches, which make the

bravest man’s heart turn sick.

Some of the scenes at home in those last days of August and early days

of September were yet more affecting. The first of our casualty lists

had been published, and they were terrible. They hit the old people

hardest, the old fathers and old mothers who had given all, and had

nothing left--not even a little child to live for. At the railway

stations, when fresh troops were leaving for the front, you saw sights

which searched the heart so much that you felt ashamed to look, feeling

they opened sanctuaries in which God’s eye alone should see.

Old Lady So-and-So seeing her youngest son off to Flanders. She has lost

two of her sons in the war already, and Archie is the last of them. The

dear old darling! It is pitiful to see her in her deep black, struggling

to keep up before the boy. But when the train has left the platform and

she can no longer wave her handkerchief she breaks down utterly. “I’ve

seen the last of him,” she says; “something tells me I’ve seen the last

of him. And now I’ve given everything I have to the country.”

Ah! that’s what you have all got to do, or be prepared to do, you brave

mothers of England, if you have to defeat a desperate enemy, who stoops

to any method, any crime.

Then old Lord Such-a-One at Victoria to meet the body of his only son

being brought back from the hospital at Boulogne. How proud he had been

of his boy! He could remember the day he captained for Eton at Lord’s,

or perhaps rowed stroke--and won--for Cambridge. And now on the field

of Flanders.... He had seen it coming, though. He had thought of it when

the war broke out. “Ours is an old family,” he had told himself, “four

hundred years old, and my son is the last of us. If I let him go to the

war my line may end, my family may stop... but then liberty must go on,

civilization must go on, and... England!”

Yes, it must be night before the British star will shine.

The Drama Of Three Hundred & Sixty-Five Days: Scenes In The Great War · 第 27 / 60 题