SECTION XLV.

AMENDMENTS BETWEEN THE HOUSES.

When either house, _e. g._, the House of Commons, sends a bill to the

other, the other may pass it with amendments. The regular progression in

this case is, that the Commons disagree to the amendment; the Lords

insist on it; the Commons insist on their disagreement; the Lords adhere

to their amendment; the Commons adhere to their disagreement. The term

of insisting may be repeated as often as they choose to keep the

question open. But the first adherence by either renders it necessary

for the other to recede or adhere also; when the matter is usually

suffered to fall. _10 Grey_, 148. Latterly, however, there are instances

of their having gone to a second adherence. There must be an absolute

conclusion of the subject somewhere, or otherwise transactions between

the houses would become endless. 3 _Hats._, 268, 270. The term of

insisting, we are told by Sir John Trevor, was then (1679) newly

introduced into parliamentary usage by the Lords. 7 _Grey_, 94. It was

certainly a happy innovation, as it multiplies the opportunities of

trying modifications which may bring the houses to concurrence. Either

house, however, is free to pass over the term of insisting, and to

adhere in the first instance (_10 Grey_, 146); but it is not respectful

to the other. In the ordinary parliamentary course, there are two free

conferences, at least before an adherence. _10 Grey_, 147.

Either house may recede from its amendment and agree to the bill; or

recede from their disagreement to the amendment, and agree to the same

absolutely, or with an amendment; for here the disagreement and receding

destroy one another, and the subject stands as before the disagreement.

_Elsynge_, 23, 27; 9 _Grey_, 476.

But the House cannot recede from, or insist on its own amendment, with

an amendment; for the same reason that it cannot send to the other house

an amendment to its own act after it has passed the act. They may

modify an amendment from the other house by ingrafting an amendment on

it, because they have never assented to it; but they cannot amend their

own amendment, because they have, on the question passed it in that

form. 9 _Grey_, 363; _10 Grey_, 240. In the Senate, March 29, 1798. Nor

where one house has adhered to their amendment, and the other agrees

with an amendment, can the first house depart from the form which they

have fixed by an adherence.

In the case of a money bill, the Lords’ proposed amendments become, by

delay, confessedly necessary. The Commons, however, refused them, as

infringing on their privileges as to money bills; but they offered

themselves to add to the bill a proviso to the same effect, which had no

coherence with the Lords’ amendments; and urged that it was an expedient

warranted by precedent, and not unparliamentary in a case become

impracticable, and irremediable in any other way. 3 _Hats._, 256, 266,

270, 271. But the Lords refused, and the bill was lost. 1 _Chand._, 288.

A like case, 1 _Chand._, 311. So the Commons resolved that it was

unparliamentary to strike out, at a conference, anything in a bill which

had been agreed and passed by both Houses. 6 _Grey_, 274; 1 _Chand._,

312.

A motion to amend an amendment from the other House takes precedence of

a motion to agree or disagree.

A bill originating in one House is passed by the other with an

amendment.

The originating House agrees to their amendment with an amendment. The

other may agree to their amendment with an amendment, that being only in

the 2d and not the 3d degree; for, as to the amending House, the first

amendment with which they passed the bill is a part of its text; it is

the only text they have agreed to. The amendment to that text by the

originating House, therefore, is only in the 1st degree, and the

amendment to that again by the amending House is only in the 2d, to wit:

an amendment to an amendment, and so admissible. Just so, when, on a

bill from the originating House, the other, at its second reading makes

an amendment; on the third reading this amendment is become the text of

the bill, and if an amendment to it be moved, an amendment to that

amendment may also be moved, as being only in the 2d degree.

The Legislative Manual, of the State of Colorado Comprising the History of Colorado, Annals of the Legislature, Manual of Customs, Precedents and Forms, Rules of Parliamentary Parliamentary Practice, and the Constitutions of the United States and the History of Colorado, Annals of the Legislature, Manual of Customs, Precedents and Forms, Rules of Parliamentary Practice, and the Constitutions of the United States and the State of Colorado. Also, Chronological Table of American History, Lists and Tables for Reference, Biographies, Etc. · 第 36 / 46 章