The present eye catches the present object--

to have and to hold while it may; and abhors, on any terms, to have it

torn from us, and nothing left in its room. It is the pang of parting,

the unloosing our grasp, the breaking asunder some strong tie, the

leaving some cherished purpose unfulfilled, that creates the repugnance

to go, and 'makes calamity of so long life,' as it often is.

O! thou strong heart!

There's such a covenant 'twixt the world and thee

They're loth to break!

The love of life, then, is an habitual attachment, not an abstract

principle. Simply _to be_ does not 'content man's natural desire': we

long to be in a certain time, place, and circumstance. We would much

rather be now, 'on this bank and shoal of time,' than have our choice of

any future period, than take a slice of fifty or sixty years out of the

Millennium, for instance. This shows that our attachment is not confined

either to _being_ or to _well-being_; but that we have an inveterate

prejudice in favour of our immediate existence, such as it is. The

mountaineer will not leave his rock, nor the savage his hut; neither are

we willing to give up our present mode of life, with all its advantages

and disadvantages, for any other that could be substituted for it. No

man would, I think, exchange his existence with any other man, however

fortunate. We had as lief _not be_, as _not be ourselves_. There are

some persons of that reach of soul that they would like to live two

hundred and fifty years hence, to see to what height of empire America

will have grown up in that period, or whether the English constitution

will last so long. These are points beyond me. But I confess I should

like to live to see the downfall of the Bourbons. That is a vital

question with me; and I shall like it the better, the sooner it happens!

No young man ever thinks he shall die. He may believe that others will,

or assent to the doctrine that 'all men are mortal' as an abstract

proposition, but he is far enough from bringing it home to himself

individually.(1) Youth, buoyant activity, and animal spirits, hold

absolute antipathy with old age as well as with death; nor have we, in

the hey-day of life, any more than in the thoughtlessness of childhood,

the remotest conception how

This sensible warm motion can become

A kneaded clod--

nor how sanguine, florid health and vigour, shall 'turn to withered,

weak, and grey.' Or if in a moment of idle speculation we indulge in

this notion of the close of life as a theory, it is amazing at what a

distance it seems; what a long, leisurely interval there is between;

what a contrast its slow and solemn approach affords to our present gay

dreams of existence! We eye the farthest verge of the horizon, and

think what a way we shall have to look back upon, ere we arrive at our

journey's end; and without our in the least suspecting it, the mists are

at our feet, and the shadows of age encompass us. The two divisions of

our lives have melted into each other: the extreme points close and meet

with none of that romantic interval stretching out between them that

we had reckoned upon; and for the rich, melancholy, solemn hues of

age, 'the sear, the yellow leaf,' the deepening shadows of an autumnal

evening, we only feel a dank, cold mist, encircling all objects, after

the spirit of youth is fled. There is no inducement to look forward;

and what is worse, little interest in looking back to what has become

so trite and common. The pleasures of our existence have worn

themselves out, are 'gone into the wastes of time,' or have turned their

indifferent side to us: the pains by their repeated blows have worn us

out, and have left us neither spirit nor inclination to encounter them

again in retrospect. We do not want to rip up old grievances, nor to

renew our youth like the phoenix, nor to live our lives twice over. Once

is enough. As the tree falls, so let it lie. Shut up the book and close

the account once for all!

It has been thought by some that life is like the exploring of a

passage that grows narrower and darker the farther we advance, without

a possibility of ever turning back, and where we are stifled for want of

breath at last. For myself, I do not complain of the greater thickness

of the atmosphere as I approach the narrow house. I felt it more

formerly,(2) when the idea alone seemed to suppress a thousand rising

hopes, and weighed upon the pulses of the blood. At present I rather

feel a thinness and want of support, I stretch out my hand to some

object and find none, I am too much in a world of abstraction; the naked

map of life is spread out before me, and in the emptiness and desolation

I see Death coming to meet me. In my youth I could not behold him for

the crowd of objects and feelings, and Hope stood always between us,

saying, 'Never mind that old fellow!' If I had lived indeed, I should

not care to die. But I do not like a contract of pleasure broken off

unfulfilled, a marriage with joy unconsummated, a promise of happiness

rescinded. My public and private hopes have been left a ruin, or remain

only to mock me. I would wish them to be re-edified. I should like to

see some prospect of good to mankind, such as my life began with. I

should like to leave some sterling work behind me. I should like to have

some friendly hand to consign me to the grave. On these conditions I

am ready, if not willing, to depart. I shall then write on my

tomb--GRATEFUL AND CONTENTED! But I have thought and suffered too much

to be willing to have thought and suffered in vain.--In looking back, it

sometimes appears to me as if I had in a manner slept out my life in a

dream or shadow on the side of the hill of knowledge, where I have fed

on books, on thoughts, on pictures, and only heard in half-murmurs the

trampling of busy feet, or the noises of the throng below. Waked out

of this dim, twilight existence, and startled with the passing scene, I

have felt a wish to descend to the world of realities, and join in the

chase. But I fear too late, and that I had better return to my bookish

chimeras and indolence once more! _Zanetto, lascia le donne, et studia

la matematica._ I will think of it.

It is not wonderful that the contemplation and fear of death become more

familiar to us as we approach nearer to it: that life seems to ebb with

the decay of blood and youthful spirits; and that as we find everything

about us subject to chance and change, as our strength and beauty die,

as our hopes and passions, our friends and our affections leave us, we

begin by degrees to feel ourselves mortal!

I have never seen death but once, and that was in an infant. It is years

ago. The look was calm and placid, and the face was fair and firm. It

was as if a waxen image had been laid out in the coffin, and strewed

with innocent flowers. It was not like death, but more like an image

of life! No breath moved the lips, no pulse stirred, no sight or sound

would enter those eyes or ears more. While I looked at it, I saw no pain

was there; it seemed to smile at the short pang of life which was over:

but I could not bear the coffin-lid to be closed--it seemed to stifle

me; and still as the nettles wave in a corner of the churchyard over

his little grave, the welcome breeze helps to refresh me, and ease the

tightness at my breast!

An ivory or marble image, like Chantry's monument of the two children,

is contemplated with pure delight. Why do we not grieve and fret that

the marble is not alive, or fancy that it has a shortness of breath? It

never was alive; and it is the difficulty of making the transition from

life to death, the struggle between the two in our imagination, that

confounds their properties painfully together, and makes us conceive

that the infant that is but just dead, still wants to breathe, to enjoy,

and look about it, and is prevented by the icy hand of death, locking up

its faculties and benumbing its senses; so that, if it could, it

would complain of its own hard state. Perhaps religious considerations

reconcile the mind to this change sooner than any others, by

representing the spirit as fled to another sphere, and leaving the body

behind it. So in reflecting on death generally, we mix up the idea of

life with it, and thus make it the ghastly monster it is. We think, how

we should feel, not how the dead feel.

Still from the tomb the voice of nature cries;

Even in our ashes live their wonted fires!

There is an admirable passage on this subject in Tucker's _Light

of Nature Pursued_, which I shall transcribe, as by much the best

illustration I can offer of it.

'The melancholy appearance of a lifeless body, the mansion provided

for it to inhabit, dark, cold, close and solitary, are shocking to the

imagination; but it is to the imagination only, not the understanding;

for whoever consults this faculty will see at first glance, that there

is nothing dismal in all these circumstances: if the corpse were kept

wrapped up in a warm bed, with a roasting fire in the chamber, it would

feel no comfortable warmth therefrom; were store of tapers lighted up as

soon as day shuts in, it would see no objects to divert it; were it left

at large it would have no liberty, nor if surrounded with company would

be cheered thereby; neither are the distorted features expressions of

pain, uneasiness, or distress. This every one knows, and will readily

allow upon being suggested, yet still cannot behold, nor even cast a

thought upon those objects without shuddering; for knowing that a

living person must suffer grievously under such appearances, they become

habitually formidable to the mind, and strike a mechanical horror, which

is increased by the customs of the world around us.'

There is usually one pang added voluntarily and unnecessarily to the

fear of death, by our affecting to compassionate the loss which others

will have in us. If that were all, we might reasonably set our minds at

rest. The pathetic exhortation on country tombstones, 'Grieve not for

me, my wife and children dear,' etc., is for the most part speedily

followed to the letter. We do not leave so great a void in society as

we are inclined to imagine, partly to magnify our own importance, and

partly to console ourselves by sympathy. Even in the same family the gap

is not so great; the wound closes up sooner than we should expect. Nay,

_our room_ is not unfrequently thought better than _our company._ People

walk along the streets the day after our deaths just as they did before,

and the crowd is not diminished. While we were living, the world seemed

in a manner to exist only for us, for our delight and amusement, because

it contributed to them. But our hearts cease to beat, and it goes on

as usual, and thinks no more about us than it did in our lifetime. The

million are devoid of sentiment, and care as little for you or me as if

we belonged to the moon. We live the week over in the Sunday's paper,

or are decently interred in some obituary at the month's end! It is

not surprising that we are forgotten so soon after we quit this mortal

stage; we are scarcely noticed while we are on it. It is not merely that

our names are not known in China--they have hardly been heard of in

the next street. We are hand and glove with the universe, and think the

obligation is mutual. This is an evident fallacy. If this, however, does

not trouble us now, it will not hereafter. A handful of dust can have

no quarrel to pick with its neighbours, or complaint to make against

Providence, and might well exclaim, if it had but an understanding and

a tongue, 'Go thy ways, old world, swing round in blue ether, voluble to

every age, you and I shall no more jostle!'

It is amazing how soon the rich and titled, and even some of those who

have wielded great political power, are forgotten.

A little rule, a little sway,

Is all the great and mighty have

Betwixt the cradle and the grave--

and, after its short date, they hardly leave a name behind them. 'A

great man's memory may, at the common rate, survive him half a year.'

His heirs and successors take his titles, his power, and his wealth--all

that made him considerable or courted by others; and he has left nothing

else behind him either to delight or benefit the world. Posterity are

not by any means so disinterested as they are supposed to be. They give

their gratitude and admiration only in return for benefits conferred.

They cherish the memory of those to whom they are indebted for

instruction and delight; and they cherish it just in proportion to the

instruction and delight they are conscious they receive. The sentiment

of admiration springs immediately from this ground, and cannot be

otherwise than well founded.(3)

The effeminate clinging to life as such, as a general or abstract idea,

is the effect of a highly civilised and artificial state of society. Men

formerly plunged into all the vicissitudes and dangers of war, or staked

their all upon a single die, or some one passion, which if they could

not have gratified, life became a burden to them--now our strongest

passion is to think, our chief amusement is to read new plays, new

poems, new novels, and this we may do at our leisure, in perfect

security, _ad infinitum_. If we look into the old histories and

romances, before the _belles-lettres_ neutralised human affairs and

reduced passion to a state of mental equivocation, we find the heroes

and heroines not setting their lives 'at a pin's fee,' but rather

courting opportunities of throwing them away in very wantonness of

spirit. They raise their fondness for some favourite pursuit to its

height, to a pitch of madness, and think no price too dear to pay for

its full gratification. Everything else is dross. They go to death as to

a bridal bed, and sacrifice themselves or others without remorse at the

shrine of love, of honour, of religion, or any other prevailing feeling.

Romeo runs his 'sea-sick, weary bark upon the rocks' of death the

instant he finds himself deprived of his Juliet; and she clasps his

neck in their last agonies, and follows him to the same fatal shore. One

strong idea takes possession of the mind and overrules every other;

and even life itself, joyless without that, becomes an object of

indifference or loathing. There is at least more of imagination in such

a state of things, more vigour of feeling and promptitude to act, than

in our lingering, languid, protracted attachment to life for its own

poor sake. It is, perhaps, also better, as well as more heroical, to

strike at some daring or darling object, and if we fail in that, to

take the consequences manfully, than to renew the lease of a tedious,

spiritless, charmless existence, merely (as Pierre says) 'to lose it

afterwards in some vile brawl' for some worthless object. Was there

not a spirit of martyrdom as well as a spice of the reckless energy of

barbarism in this bold defiance of death? Had not religion something to

do with it: the implicit belief in a future life, which rendered this of

less value, and embodied something beyond it to the imagination; so

that the rough soldier, the infatuated lover, the valorous knight, etc.,

could afford to throw away the present venture, and take a leap into the

arms of futurity, which the modern sceptic shrinks back from, with all

his boasted reason and vain philosophy, weaker than a woman! I cannot

help thinking so myself; but I have endeavoured to explain this point

before, and will not enlarge farther on it here.

A life of action and danger moderates the dread of death. It not only

gives us fortitude to bear pain, but teaches us at every step the

precarious tenure on which we hold our present being. Sedentary and

studious men are the most apprehensive on this score. Dr. Johnson was

an instance in point. A few years seemed to him soon over, compared with

those sweeping contemplations on time and infinity with which he had

been used to pose himself. In the _still-life_ of a man of letters there

was no obvious reason for a change. He might sit in an arm-chair and

pour out cups of tea to all eternity. Would it had been possible for him

to do so! The most rational cure after all for the inordinate fear of

death is to set a just value on life. If we merely wish to continue on

the scene to indulge our headstrong humours and tormenting passions,

we had better begone at once; and if we only cherish a fondness for

existence according to the good we derive from it, the pang we feel at

parting with it will not be very severe!

Table Talk: Essays on Men and Manners · 第 82 / 83 题