FOOTNOTES:

[1] The discovery of the plant in question is related in the _Flora

Lapponica_ in so interesting a manner, that we cannot refrain from

translating the passage. See the second edition, p. 135.

"I met with this plant but once, and that throughout a journey of four

hours, over the celebrated mountain of Wallivari in the district of

Lulea, towards a tract of country which lies about half way between the

northern and western part, where it grew in great abundance.

"Whilst I was walking quickly along, in a profuse perspiration, facing

the cold wind, at midnight; if I may call it night when the sun was

shining without setting at all; still anxiously inquiring of my

interpreter how near we were to a Lapland dwelling, which I had for two

hours been expecting, though I knew not its precise situation; casting

my eager eyes around me in all directions, I perceived as it were the

shadow of this plant, but did not stop to examine it, taking it for the

_Empetrum_. But after going a few steps further, an idea of its being

something I was unacquainted with came across my mind, and I turned

back; when I should again have taken it for the _Empetrum_, had not its

greater height caused me to consider it with more attention. I know not

what it is that so deceives the sight in our Alps during the night, as

to render objects far less distinct than in the middle of the day,

though the sun shines equally bright. The sun being near the horizon,

spreads its rays in such a horizontal direction, that a hat can scarcely

protect our eyes: besides, the shadows of plants are so infinitely

extended, and so confounded with each other, from the tremulous

agitation caused by the blustering wind, that objects very different in

themselves are scarcely to be distinguished from each other. Having

gathered one of these plants, I looked about and found several more in

the neighbourhood, all on the north side, where they grew in plenty; but

I never met with the same in any other place afterwards. As at this time

they had lost their flowers, and were ripening seed, it was not till

after I had sought for a very long time that I met with a single flower,

which was white, shaped like a lily of the valley, but with five sharper

divisions."

[2] This strange passage is presumed to allude to a little gun, four or

five inches long, still shown in the arsenal at Stockholm, with which

vulgar report says the famous Queen Christina used to kill fleas.

[3] It is not impossible that Linnæus might be misled here by the

prejudices of his time, or by those of the people from whom he obtained

his account.

[4] The whole of this account of the hay consists, in the manuscript, of

such concise, disjointed, and obscure notes, that we are by no means

certain of having preserved the exact sense.

[5] La Motraye, after describing the Lapland sledge, observes that "it

is attached by a single trace or thong, passing under the belly of the

reindeer, and fixed to a leather collar which goes round the animal's

neck. A long cord made of twisted fir bark, tied to his horns, serves,

when pulled in a straight line, to stop his course, or, when drawn

toward either side, to turn him in that direction. When this cord is

made to strike him gently, by a vertical motion, on the back, it urges

him to greater speed. The overturn of the sledge, where the road is

uneven, is prevented by a stick, which serves, like the oar or paddle of

a boat, to guide its course."

[6] Linnæus records this misfortune in his _Flora Lapponica_, at n. 42,

see ed. 2. p. 27, where, in speaking of _Arundo Calamagrostis_, he says

he "presumes the synonyms are rightly applied, though he had no

opportunity of comparing his plant with books and descriptions, having

lost the specimen, with various other natural productions, by being cast

away as he was descending one of the great rivers of Lapland." The

synonym of Morison at least, which he has thus by memory applied, proves

to be erroneous.

[7] This account does not agree with the description in the _Flora

Lapponica_, but is the most correct.

[8] This also is correct.

[9] A few further remarks on the above subject, printed in the _Flora

Lapponica_, may be acceptable to the English reader.

"This disease made no regular progress, nor was it communicated by

infection from one animal to another. The cows are driven all together

in the spring to feed in a meadow, near the town, to the southwest, on

the other side of a creek of the river, in which I was informed the

greatest mortality happened. The symptoms differ in different cases; but

all the cattle, feeding indiscriminately, are seized with a swelling of

the abdomen, attended with convulsions, and die with horrid bellowing,

in the space of a few days. No person dares venture to flay the recent

carcases, it having been found by experience that not only the hands,

but even the face, in consequence of the warm steams from the body,

became inflamed and gangrenous, and that death finally ensued.

"I was asked whether this disease was a kind of plague; whether the

meadow in question produced any venomous spiders; or whether the

yellow-coloured water was poisonous.

"That it was no plague appeared from its not being contagious, and from

the spring being its most fatal season. I saw no spiders here, except

what are common throughout all Sweden; nor was the yellow sediment of

the water any thing more than a common innocent ochre of iron.

"I had scarcely landed from the boat in which I was taken to this

meadow, than the _Cicuta_ presented itself before me, and explained the

cause of all this destruction. It is most abundant in the meadow where

the cattle are first seized with the distemper, especially near the

shore. The slightest observation teaches us that brute animals

distinguish, by natural instinct, such plants as are wholesome to them,

from such as are poisonous. The cattle therefore do not eat this Hemlock

in summer or autumn; whence few of them perish at those seasons, and

such only as devour the herb in question incautiously, or from an

inordinate appetite. But when they are first turned out in the spring,

partly from their eagerness for fresh herbage, partly from their long

fasting and starvation, they seize with avidity whatever comes within

their reach. The herbage is then but short, and insufficient to satisfy

them; probably also it is in general more succulent, immersed under

water, and scarcely perceptibly scented; so that they are unable to

distinguish the wholesome from the pernicious kinds. I remarked every

where that the radical leaves only were cropped, no others; which

confirmed what I have asserted. In a neighbouring meadow I saw this same

plant cut with the hay for winter food; so that it is no wonder if in

that state some, even of the more cautious cattle, are destroyed by it."

_Fl. Lapp. ed._ 2. 76.

[10] This plant is not mentioned in the _Flora Lapponica_, and the

account annexed seems to belong to _Ligusticum scoticum_, n. 107 of that

work, with which it well agrees.

[11] Linnæus in this description denominates these leaflets, whether of

the general or partial involucrum, _radii_, a term he always

subsequently used for the stalks of the umbels.

[12] King Charles the Eleventh, on his visit to Tornea in 1694, was

accompanied by Count G. Douglas the Lord Lieutenant, Count Piper

Counsellor of Chancery, J. Hoghusen Counsellor of the Board of War, and

some other learned men, and in the night between the 13th and 14th of

June saw, from the belfry of the church, the midnight sun, at that time

visible there to a person placed on such an elevation. The year

following, Professors Bilberg and Spole were sent to Tornea to repeat

these observations. The royal visit to Tornea was commemorated by a

medal struck on the occasion, having on one side the bust of the king;

on the reverse, a representation of the sun half above the horizon, with

this motto, _Soli inocciduo Sol obvius alter_; and beneath, _Iter Regis

ad Botniam Occidentalem_, _Mense Junio_ 1694.

[13] _Stegerhusen._ I have not been able to make out the precise meaning

of this word.

[14] John Messenius, famous for his learning and his misfortunes, was

professor of law and politics at Upsal, in the reign of the great

Gustavus Adolphus, who had a high esteem for him, and who exerted all

his wisdom, and even his power, to allay the envy and hatred of some of

the colleagues of this able man, especially of John Rudbeck, a malignant

though learned theologian. The king in vain endeavoured to pacify

Rudbeck by preferment, while he removed Messenius to Stockholm, and made

him a member of the new council established there. The latter was

formally accused of being a secret partisan of the deposed catholic king

Sigismond, and was condemned to a perpetual prison, where he composed a

great work entitled _Scandia illustrata_, published at Stockholm between

the years 1700 and 1714. Messenius died in 1636. His son Arnold might be

justified for detesting those who had persecuted his illustrious father,

but not for the folly of expressing his feelings in satirical

publications against people in power. For this he paid with his life on

the scaffold in 1648, and his own son, aged about 17, suffered with him.

[15] In the Journal, vol. i. 101, Linnæus speaks of Mr. Oladron as the

curate of Lycksele, and his wife.

[16] The manuscript says July 1st, but this does not agree with the

original journal, which therefore I have followed. See the first page of

this volume.

[17] _Jacq. Ic. Rar. t. 154. Willd. Sp. Pl. v. 3. 1287._

[18] We know not what species the author intends by this name.

* * * * *

Lachesis Lapponica; Or, A Tour in Lapland, Volume 2 · 第 68 / 69 题