CHAPTER XVI.

RISE OF THE DRAMA.

In one shape or another, the drama, acting with or without written

words, is always in existence, at least in the form of pantomime, even

among the rudest peoples. The Church permitted a kind of half-ritual,

half-dramatic representation of sacred scenes at a very early period:

but we have no earlier relic of English written plays than the very

brief "Harrowing of Hell" of the first half of the fourteenth century.

There are a few speeches between our Lord and Satan, and our Lord

and the released Hebrew patriarchs. A good idea of the plays of the

fifteenth century may be obtained from the set called the "Townley

Plays" because the manuscript belonged at one time to the old Jacobite

family of Townley. It is thought to have been originally the property

of the Abbey of Woodkirk or Widkirk near Wakefield, and one play, the

second play representing the Shepherds at the birth of Christ, contains

allusions to the country scenes near Woodkirk. The plays were acted

on movable wooden stages, by the members of the various trade guilds,

such as the Glovers, the _Barkers_ (Tanners, "There is brass on the

target of _barkened_ bull's hide," says Scott in "Bonnie Dundee"), the

Grocers, and so forth.

The plays of one town are sometimes the basis of the plays of another

town, some of those of York follow those of Wakefield, and in places

Wakefield borrows from York. The authors are unknown; if they were

priests, these clerics had much more of broad humour than of reverence

as we understand it. No doubt the plays informed the spectators on

points of the scriptural story, but the religion was highly recreative.

Nothing can have been more amusing to the crowd than the spectacle of

their neighbours playing all manner of highly laughable pranks by way

of illustrating the gross, grumbling, reckless, impudent Cain; or the

rustic waggeries of the local shepherds of Bethlehem. Even now the

words of the plays make a man laugh aloud, in the comic parts, as he

reads them. They are of the broadest farce, yet our mirth rises more

from the character displayed than from mere practical buffoonery and

clowning. The Tanners enacted the "Creation"; the Glovers, the "Death

of Abel". Many Old Testament stories were played, the unaccomplished

Sacrifice of Isaac, the story of Abraham, and so on, with the Birth,

Crucifixion, and Ascension of our Lord, and the soliloquy and suicide

of Judas, a fragment.

Whoever the authors may have been, they took pains to represent the

most unearthly characters as very human, though the opening soliloquy

of the Deity at the Creation is orthodox and majestic. The Cherubim

then take up the tale, praising the Works, especially praising Lucifer,

"He is so lovely and so bright!" Lucifer enters and, accepting the

praise, proposes to be Lord of all and says that the Throne becomes

him rarely, taking his seat on it! The bad Angels approve in the most

colloquial style; the good dissent, and the bad, sent down below,

express their lively regrets.

The slaying of Abel is introduced by Garcio, not a scriptural

character, in an impudent speech; and then Cain enters, ploughing,

cursing his horses, and wrangling with his boy, who offers to fight

him. Abel enters, full of human kindness, but Cain insults him in the

coarsest rustic manner, "Go to the Devil and say I bade". Abel insists

that Cain should offer a burnt-sacrifice of a tenth of his corn, but

Cain loves paying tithes no more than any other farmer. He grumbles in

the true natural tone of the depressed agriculturist,

When all men's com was fair in field,

There was mine not worth a held.

The weather is such, says Cain, that the farmer owes no gratitude to

providence, no tithes. He selects his worst sheaves, as pay tithe he

must. The Deity intervenes, but Cain treats him with the most serene

insolence, kills the remonstrating Abel with the jaw-bone of some

animal, and, in short, is no more edifying than Mr. Punch, whose

lawless and irreverent behaviour in the popular street drama is a

survival of the humour of Cain.

The "Rejoicing of the Shepherds," the second play, is much more

human and various: the shepherds are full of the complaints of their

condition with which Piers Plowman has made us familiar, but the

provisions at their picnic are rich and various, and the adventure of

Mak, the sheep stealer, is of the best comedy. Hospitably entertained

by the shepherds, Mak steals a sheep, flays it, and takes it home to

his wife. They put it in a cradle, and cover it with blankets, next

Mak hies to the shepherds again, grumbling that his wife has a new

baby. They suspect and follow him; he denies his theft, and will eat

the child in the cradle, if the sheep can be found on his premises. It

_is_ found. This child, says a shepherd, has too long a snout. Mrs.

Mak, with much presence of mind, admits the fact, but declares that her

child is a fairy changeling: fairies stole the baby at midnight, and

left this ugly substitute. The shepherds forgive Mak, for the joke's

sake, after tossing him in a sheet.

The same story is told of Archy Armstrong, the border reiver and

jester. When the shepherds go back to their flocks, the Angel sings

_Gloria in excelsis_; and the shepherds criticize the music learnedly,

"there was no crochet wrong," and imitate the air. The sacred part

of the play, the Adoration, and offering of balls and toys to the

new-born babe, is very brief. The play is a most humorous and lively

representation of "our liberal shepherds," the sacred narrative merely

affords a pretext for the gambol. England was merry England in the

fifteenth century, in spite of defeats in France, murder and civil war

at home, preachings and burnings of Lollards, and all the grievances of

Piers Plowman, the cruelty of the great, and the greed and cunning of

the Friars.

The play of "Lazarus," on the other hand, is not only solemn, closely

following the words of the Gospel, but is as full as the Anglo-Saxon

poem, "The Grave," of sepulchral horrors.

Of the costumes we may judge by that of St. Paul on the road to

Damascus, in "The Digby Plays"--the Apostle is "dressed like an

adventurous knight," and is mounted. In place of scene-shifting the

audience shifted from one open-air stage in the street to another.

There were dances between the scenes. Paul's servant has a scene of

banter with an ostler. He maintains that he is a gentleman's servant,

a superior person. Says the ostler: "I saw such another gentleman with

you, a barrowful he bare of horse dung... and such other gear".

There are forty characters and a crowd in the play of "Mary Magdalene,"

and much skill in stage management must have been needed. In this

play of more than two thousand lines allegorical characters abound,

including the Seven Deadly Sins; much of the Gospel story of the

Magdalene is introduced, with lively scenes from the unconverted career

of the Lady of the Castle of Magdala, and there is a long passage of

sheer romance; we have a storm at sea; the abandonment of the King's

wife and child on a rock; their discovery later, alive and well--in

fact the story is akin to that in Shakespeare's "Pericles".

We see that the secular entertainment, the drama of romance, is

ousting its religious occasion and pretext. In "Mary Magdalene," too,

we observe that the "Miracle Play" on sacred subjects, is combined

with the "Morality," the drama with allegorical characters (as in the

"Romance of the Rose"), presented in flesh and blood, and therefore

more entertaining than they are in the endless allegorical poems. The

Morality of "Everyman" has been revived with much success in our own

time. In all these plays the verse takes many rhyming forms, mainly

lyric. The chief collections are the Townley, York, Chester, Digby,

Coventry, and a Macro (named from an owner of the manuscript). In the

Macro play, "Mankind," the actors make collections of money from the

audience: they must have belonged to a professional strolling company,

not to an honourable and disinterested trading guild. The piece is a

gross burlesque of morality, full of blatant jests and dog-Latin rhymes.

There is a scientific Morality, an "Interlude," "The Four Elements," in

which Nature, Humanity, Studious Desire, Sensual Appetite, Experience,

and Ignorance play their parts. Much novel information about the

dimensions of the earth and meteorology is given; Studious Desire is

an apt pupil, but Sensual Appetite and the Taverner offer instruction

more palatable to "the Man in the Street". They introduce

little Nell

A proper wench, she danceth well,

And Jane with the black lace,

We will have bouncing Bess also.

and Humanity slinks out of the lecture room, being more concerned

to see a pretty girl,

It is a world to see her whirl

Dancing in a round,

than to observe the gyrations of the terrestrial globe.

In "Hickscorner," an interlude of the same kind, the hero has been in

as many places as Widsith himself, including

the land of Rumbelow

Three mile out of hell.

Hickscorner and Free Will are worse roisterers than Humanity, and their

rude waggeries make the mirth, though Free Will speaks of forswearing

sack and living cleanly.

Heywood.

John Heywood is one of the few known authors of these things; he was of

what is now Pembroke College, Dr. Johnson's College, in Oxford, and was

an acquaintance of Sir Thomas More, who frankly admits that by nature

he was "a giglot," a gay fellow, though, by grace, devout. Heywood

was merry in mournful times, when Henry VIII began to make martyrs of

Protestants, and of Catholics who were not, at any moment, of the same

shade of belief as himself. The anecdotes say that Heywood saved his

skin by his jests, that after Henry's death he amused Mary Tudor, who

was not easily amused, and that he fled from persecution under Edward

VI, and died abroad in the reign of Elizabeth.

His best-known piece is "The Four P's," a Pothecary, Pardoner, Palmer,

and Pedlar. Why, asks the Pardoner, should the Palmer visit hundreds

of remote shrines, while the Pardoner, at his very door, can sell him

forgiveness of sins at the lowest figure? He can cleanse a thousand

souls for as small a sum as the Palmer spends on one voyage. All four

men are impudent rogues, and all, in the spirit of the Morality, are

rapidly converted; the Pedlar becoming as pious as Piers Plowman. There

is no action, and the great jest is that, in a lying competition, the

Pedlar says that he has never seen "a woman out of patience". The

diversion must have been derived mainly from the antics of the players

on the stage.

Heywood's "Thersites" (the impudent orator in the "Iliad") was written

about 1537, to make mirth for the birth feast of the Prince of Wales,

afterwards Edward VI. Thersites asks Mulciber (Hephæstus) to make him a

helmet (sallet) as he made the arms of Achilles. This enables Mulciber

to vent many puns on salad; they look like the very first puns ever

devised, and occupy two pages. The pun seems to have been a novelty in

Tudor England. Thersites is a rough-hewn predecessor of Shakespeare's

Pistol. There is much mockery of sacred relics and some buffoonery by

way of action. Telemachus brings a letter from Ulysses (such a thing,

said J. J. Rousseau, very foolishly, would have been useful in the

"Odyssey") and Miles, the Knight, ends all with a pious speech.

In early Tudor England the drama had sunk many fathoms below the level

of the Miracle Plays, such as that of the Shepherds. The rise of the

drama, under Elizabeth, is a kind of miracle, like the sculpture of

Phidias appearing after the rude art of the artists who worked at

Athens before the victories of Marathon and Salamis.

In "Jack Juggler," however, we find the influence of Roman comedy

faintly dawning, for the play is Plautus's comedy of "Amphitryon,"

"without Amphitryon," the hero, and with the mischievous and

much-beaten Jack Juggler as the source of the fun.

The infant drama had wandered out of Biblical and allegorical subjects

into touch with actual ancient Roman comedy, and, with Bale's "King

John," was preluding to Shakespeare's Chronicle Plays. In the dawn

of the Reformation, disputants on both sides addressed the people in

Interludes, just as to-day a person "with a purpose" puts it into

a novel, in place of writing a sober and reasonable treatise which

would not be read. Among the plays with a purpose none is more absurd

than the "King John" of John Bale (1495-1563). Bale, whose best work

is a kind of history of English literature in Latin, was a fiery hot

gospeller; he had to leave the country under Mary Tudor. In "King John"

that profane and licentious but astute prince appears as a kind of

Protestant martyr. Attacked by Stephen Langton, he says that the Church

hates him because he does not found abbeys, and is in favour of an open

Bible. So he is poisoned by the wicked priests!

In the interests of History no less than of her Church, Queen Mary

issued proclamations against plays with a Protestant purpose, while

Elizabeth was equally severe against Catholic Interludes.

We must think of these Interludes, whether moral, religious,

scientific, or amusing, being played from the reign of Henry VIII

till the middle of the reign of Elizabeth. Till 1575 or 1576 there

were no theatre-houses; stages were erected in halls of palaces,

castles, colleges, and in open spaces of towns. The King or Queen had

Interlude players in their service, as they had musicians. Companies

calling themselves "the Servants," and wearing the liveries of nobles

and gentlemen, strolled about the country, protected by their more

or less nominal masters, and supporting themselves by their skill

in their profession. The "children," that is the boys, of various

schools, especially of St. Paul's, acted under the managership of

their teachers. The undergraduates of the Universities also acted,

at first in Latin, before Queen Elizabeth, who did not conceal her

distaste for what did not amuse her. The language of the plays was cast

into all sorts of rhyming measures, and "the Vice" or lively buffoon

of the Interludes was the germ of the Shakespearean Clown. There was

abundance both of writers and players, but the plays had little merit

as literature.

Ralph Roister Doister.

Among the unforgotten of these dwellers on the threshold of the

Elizabethan drama is "Ralph Roister Doister," by Nicholas Udall

(1505-1556) (of Corpus Christi College, Oxford, later headmaster of

Eton, and next of Westminster; he died in the reign of Mary Tudor).

The Vice, so to speak, or clever buffooning parasite, of the piece is

Matthew Merrygreek, who in a long rhyming prologue describes his own

way of life and his intention to befool the braggart Ralph Roister

Doister. Ralph enters melancholy, he is in love: he has met the lady at

supper, but forgets her name. She is rich (says Matthew), a widow, and

betrothed to another man. Ralph is a fatuous ass, like Malvolio, and

thinks all women in love with him. Merrygreek fools him to the top of

his bent, and presents the lady with a forged love-letter from Ralph,

who is drubbed by the maid-servants and generally disgraced, while the

true love of the heroine returns from a voyage to be happy with her.

There is plenty of noise, singing, and beating, and some intrigue in

the case of the genuine wooer and his suspicious jealousy.

Gammer Gurton's Needle.

The equally renowned "Gammer Gurton's Needle," was acted sixteen

years after "Ralph Roister Doister," at Christ's College, Cambridge.

It is usually attributed to John Still (born 1543) a member of

Christ's, Master of Arts in 1565, and later Master of that College,

Vice-Chancellor of the University, and finally Bishop of Bath and

Wells (died 1608). As Vice-Chancellor, Still was a stickler for Latin

plays at Cambridge, which were more educational but not so popular as

dramas in English. The plot turns on the loss of a needle by old Gammer

Gurton, the suspicion, raised by a wag, that another old woman has

stolen it; the search for the needle; combats about the needle, and

the final discovery of that implement in the seat of a man's breeches.

A sturdy beggar, Diccon, is "the Vice," and sets Gammer Gurton and

another gammer to a scolding match. Hodge, a servant, with his broad

dialect, and insistent demand for the needle, that a large and unseemly

hole which ventilates his breeches may instantly be patched, has

perhaps the most comic part, and when somebody slaps Hodge and drives

the needle (which had stuck in his breeches), into a safe part of his

person, the joy of a Cambridge audience knew no limits. The play is

thoroughly rustic, the language is of an amazing breadth, and no doubt

the drama made abundant mirth among the Cantab wits. Members of the

sister University, where poets have been rare in comparison with these

glories of Cambridge, need not covet Still, unless he wrote the famous

drinking song in the Second Act, "Back and Side go bare, go bare!"

The Bishop of Bath and Wells probably looked back with mingled feelings

on the jolly, noisy achievement of his youth, which has made him

immortal, for all have heard of "Gammer Gurton's Needle". It is written

in rhyming lines of from fourteen to sixteen syllables.

"Gorboduc."

"The Gammer," though low, is lively; not so is "Gorboduc"; it is a

tragedy of unspeakable dullness composed in blank verse which has no

merit except that of regularity, the sense usually, though not always,

ending at the close of each line. The author, Thomas Sackville, later

Lord Buckhurst and Earl of Dorset, and High Treasurer under James VI

and I, was born at Buckhurst, Sussex, in 1536. His grandmother was

aunt of Anne Boleyn, so he was a second cousin of Queen Elizabeth. At

the Inner Temple, as a young man, he met Thomas Norton, and the pair

composed "Gorboduc," which was acted in the Inner Temple in 1561.

The authors were inspired by no other Muse than that of Seneca, the

moral philosopher, Roman tragedian, and tutor of the Emperor Nero. The

play tells how Gorboduc, a mythical King of Britain, abdicated, and,

dividing his realm into two parts, gave the country north of the Humber

to the younger, and the portion south of the Humber to the elder of

his two sons, Ferrex and Porrex. Each had a kind of tutor, and each

had a favourite. They were both discontented, the younger slew the

elder son, and the mother of both avenges the elder on the younger of

her children. The result was national ruin, in which "Fergus Duke of

Albany" (apparently King of Scotland is meant) took an active part.

There are very long speeches, no action; a messenger brings the news of

the distressing occurrences, and a Chorus moralizes on them. Carried

away by grief when his wife murders his surviving boy, Gorboduc

pronounces the name of Eubulus with the penultimate syllable short, and

expires with decency behind the scenes. Eubulus then utters a political

forecast in more than a hundred lines, and the drama concludes.

"Gorboduc" was printed in 1565: translations of Seneca's plays were

also being written: George Gascoigne translated a piece named "Jocasta"

(the wife of Œdipus) from the Italian, and a prose comedy, "The

Supposes" from Ariosto. This great Italian poet and his countrymen

adapted to Italian manners the plots and characters which the ancient

comic dramatists of Rome, Terence and Plautus, derived from late Greek

comedy of everyday life. Thus an element of orderliness in comedy

was introduced in England from adaptations of Italian adaptations of

Roman copies of late Greek plays. Such stock characters as the austere

father, the spendthrift son, the cunning servant, the boastful soldier,

the nurse, soft of heart and loose of tongue, invaded the comedy of

France, and, to a slighter degree, that of England.

Meanwhile Richard Edwards produced a curious Interlude of a classical

nature, "Damon and Pythias," the characters being Greek, Sicilian and

English--a dash of buffoonery is mixed with very lamentable matter.

The Drama was formless, unable to attain definite shape, till some

twenty-five years had passed when we reach the date of the immediate

predecessors of Shakespeare, such as Marlowe, Greene, Lyly, Peele,

and the other University young men about town. The influences of the

old waggish or controversial Interludes, of the Senecan school of

stiffness, and of translations or imitations of Italian comedies, were

seething in the cauldron of the age.

History of English Literature from "Beowulf" to Swinburne · 第 16 / 29 章