CHAPTER VI

EMPEDOCLES

Empedocles was a man of Agrigentum in Sicily. The dates of his birth

and death are placed about 495 and 435 B.C. respectively. Like

Pythagoras, he possessed a powerful and magnetic personality. Hence

all kinds of legends quickly grew up and wove themselves round his

life and death. He was credited with the performance of miracles, and

romantic stories were circulated about his death. A man of much

persuasive eloquence he raised himself to the leadership of the

Agrigentine democracy, until he was driven out into exile.

The philosophy of Empedocles is eclectic in character. Greek

philosophy had now developed a variety of conflicting principles, and

the task of Empedocles is to reconcile these, and to weld them

together in a new system, containing however no new thought of its

own. In speaking of Parmenides, I pointed out that his teaching may be

interpreted either in an idealistic or a materialistic sense, and that

these two aspects of thought lie side by side in Parmenides, and that

it is possible to emphasize either the one or the other. Empedocles

seizes upon the materialistic side. The essential thought of

Parmenides was that Being cannot pass into not-being, nor not-being

into Being. Whatever is, remains for ever what it is. {82} If we take

that in a purely material context, what it means is that matter has

neither beginning nor end, is uncreated and indestructible. And this

is the first basic principle of Empedocles. On the other hand,

Heracleitus had shown that becoming and change cannot be denied. This

is the second basic principle of Empedocles. That there is no absolute

becoming, no creation, and utter destruction of things, and yet that

things do somehow arise and pass away, this must be explained, these

contradictory ideas must be reconciled. Now if we assert that matter

is uncreated and indestructible, and yet that things arise and pass

away, there is only one way of explaining this. We must suppose that

objects, as wholes begin and cease to be, but that the material

particles of which they are composed are uncreated and indestructible.

This thought now forms the first principle of Empedocles, and of his

successors, Anaxagoras, and the Atomists.

Now the Ionic philosophers had taught that all things are composed of

some one ultimate matter. Thales believed it to be water, Anaximenes

air. This necessarily involved that the ultimate kind of matter must

be capable of transformation into other kinds of matter. If it is

water, then water must be capable of turning into brass, wood, iron,

air, or whatever other kind of matter exists. And the same thing

applies to the air of Anaximenes. Parmenides, however, had taught that

whatever is, remains always the same, no change or transformation

being possible. Empedocles here too follows Parmenides, and interprets

his doctrine in his own way. One kind of matter, he thinks, can never

change into another kind of matter; fire never becomes {83} water, nor

does earth ever become air. This leads Empedocles at once to a

doctrine of elements. The word "elements," indeed, is of later

invention, and Empedocles speaks of the elements as "the roots of

all." There are four elements, earth, air, fire, and water. Empedocles

was therefore the originator of the familiar classification of the

four elements. All other kinds of matter are to be explained as

mixtures, in various proportions, of these four. Thus all origination

and decease, as well as the differential qualities of certain kinds of

matter, are now explained by the mixing and unmixing of the four

elements. All becoming is simply composition and decomposition.

But the coming together and separation of the elements involves the

movement of particles, and to explain this there must exist some

moving force. The Ionic philosophers had assumed that matter has the

power or force required for movement immanent in itself. The air of

Anaximenes, of its own inherent power, transforms itself into other

kinds of matter. This doctrine Empedocles rejects. Matter is for him

absolutely dead and lifeless, without any principle of motion in

itself. There is, therefore, only one remaining possibility. Forces

acting upon matter from the outside must be assumed. And as the two

essential processes of the world, mixing and unmixing, are opposite in

character, so there must be two opposite forces. These he calls by the

names Love and Hate, or Harmony and Discord. Though these terms may

have an idealistic sound, Empedocles conceives them as entirely

physical and material forces. But he identifies the attractions and

repulsions of human beings, which we call love and hate, with the

universally operating forces of the material world. Human love and

{84} hate are but the manifestations in us of the mechanical forces of

attraction and repulsion at work in the world at large.

Empedocles taught the doctrine of periodic world-cycles. The

world-process is, therefore, properly speaking, circular, and has

neither beginning nor end. But in describing this process one must

begin somewhere. We will begin, then, with the sphairos (sphere). In

the primeval sphere the four elements are completely mixed, and

interpenetrate each other completely. Water is not separated off from

air, nor air from earth. All are chaotically mixed together. In any

portion of the sphere there must be an equal quantity of earth, air,

fire and water. The elements are thus in union, and the sole force

operative within the sphere is Love or Harmony. Hence the sphere is

called a "blessed god." Hate, however, exists all round the outside of

the sphere. Hate gradually penetrates from the circumference towards

the centre and introduces the process of separation and disunion of

the elements. This process continues till, like coming together with

like, the elements are wholly separated. All the water is together;

all the fire is together, and so on. When this process of

disintegration is complete, Hate is supreme and Love is entirely

driven out. But Love again begins to penetrate matter, to cause union

and mixture of the elements, and finally brings the world back to the

state of the original sphere. Then the same process begins again. At

what position in this circular movement is our present world to be

placed? The answer is that it is neither in the complete union of the

sphere, nor is it completely disintegrated. It is half-way between the

sphere and the stage of total {85} disintegration. It is proceeding

from the former towards the later, and Hate is gradually gaining the

upper hand. In the formation of the present world from the sphere the

first element to be separated off was air, next fire, then the earth.

Water is squeezed out of the earth by the rapidity of its rotation.

The sky is composed of two halves. One is of fire, and this is the

day. The other is dark matter with masses of fire scattered about in

it, and this is the night.

Empedocles believed in the transmigration of souls. He also put

forward a theory of sense-perception, the essential of which is that

like perceives like. The fire in us perceives external fire, and so

with the other elements. Sight is caused by effluences of the fire and

water of the eyes meeting similar effluences from external objects.

{86}

A critical history of Greek philosophy · 第 6 / 21 章