CHAPTER XVII.

ANSWERS TO CERTAIN OBJECTIONS BROUGHT AGAINST THE DOCTRINE OF THE BLESSED

EUCHARIST.

Many and great difficulties are wont to arise in man’s mind concerning

the dogma of the Blessed Eucharist. We, therefore, deem it expedient,

to devote some space to their consideration. When we declare that the

whole Body of Christ is contained in a little bread, and all His Blood

in a little wine; and that, at the same time, the whole Christ is in

Heaven; it seems as if we were affirming an impossibility. For Christ

can only be present in this Sacrament in one of two ways. Either, the

bread is changed into the Body of Christ; and this appears to be out

of the question. For a thing into which another thing is changed, has

no existence before this change; it only begins to exist when this

change has taken place. If, then, the bread be changed into the Body of

Christ, His Body cannot have existed before the bread was changed into

It; just as the serpent into which the rod of Aaron was changed had no

existence previous to this miracle. Thus, the Body of Christ which is in

the Blessed Eucharist, is not the Body which is in Heaven, but another

Body newly produced. Or else, we may say that the Body of Christ which

is in Heaven, comes by local movement into the Blessed Sacrament. But

this seems, likewise, impossible. Firstly, because, unless His Body

left Heaven altogether, it would have to be in two places at once.

Secondly, because local movement cannot terminate in more than one place

at the same time; and we know that many Hosts are consecrated at once.

Thirdly, because one Body cannot be in more than one place at the same

moment. How, also, can a full-grown Body be contained in a little Host,

and all Its Blood in a small chalice? Again, it seems impossible that

accidents can exist without their substance; the more so as we know, by

experience, that the consecrated bread and wine do what accidents alone

could not do—(_e.g._, nourish, warm, and strengthen the body)—and that

the consecrated wine, if consumed to excess, would produce intoxication.

Furthermore, the consecrated elements are subject to vicissitudes,

such as burning, putrefaction, etc., which could not affect mere

accidents. And, again, if the elements be divided into small particles,

how can the Body of Christ be present in each fraction? Our answer to

these objections is that which we have made before, _viz._, that the

infinite power of God can do more than we can conceive; and that, what

is impossible to nature and to man, is possible to Him. In the Blessed

Eucharist there is nothing beyond the power of God. For we say that the

Body and Blood of Christ are present in this Sacrament by conversion.

And this is not impossible to God, although it is impossible to nature,

which cannot change one thing into another thing already in existence.

If the infinite power of God can create something out of nothing, can it

not, much more, cause one substance to be transformed into another, and

therefore the substance of bread and wine to become the substance of the

Body and Blood of Christ?

Since, then, the Body of Christ is not present in the Blessed Eucharist

by local movement, _i.e._, by descent from Heaven into the Host, but

solely by conversion, we must admit that His presence in Heaven differs

modally from His sacramental presence. In Heaven His Body, like other

bodies, occupies space and is extended; but He is present in the Host,

not by mode of extension, but in an indivisible manner, and in a mode so

wonderful, that this whole Body is present in every fragment of the Host.

This mode of existence is possible only to God, whose power exceeds the

bounds of our intelligence. But, observe, that in the Blessed Eucharist

the Body of Christ is present under the appearance of bread, and His

Blood under that of wine; but as His Blood, His Soul, and his Divinity

never leave His Body, and His Body never leaves His Blood, the whole

Christ is, by natural concomitance, present in every particle and drop of

both species. Christ, furthermore, is not present in this Sacrament as in

a place. Therefore, although there are many Hosts on many altars, He is

not in many places but in many Sacraments. We see this in our own case,

for we know that our whole soul is in every part of our body, and yet we

do not say that it is in different places; because the soul is not in the

body as in a place, but as the form in its matter.

As God has created all things out of nothing by His own Power, without

the aid of other causes, He can produce all natural effects without using

secondary causes. Therefore, although, naturally speaking, substance

upholds accidents, God can preserve accidents without the help of

substance. Many philosophers have maintained that quantity can exist

without substance; and we say that in the Blessed Eucharist, not quantity

only, but all other accidents, do, by the power of God, exist without

substance. Not only does God enable accidents to exist without substance;

but He enables them to do, and to suffer, that which substance would do

and suffer, were the accidents joined to substance, _e.g._, to nourish,

to intoxicate, to putrefy, to burn, etc. These actions and sufferings do

not extend to the Body of Christ, but only to the accidents. Thus when

the Host is broken, the fracture does not affect the Body of Christ,

which remains entire in each particle.[22] Many other difficulties may be

urged against the dogma of the Eucharist, but the solution we have given

to the difficulties enumerated, will pave the way to the solution of all

others. And it will be manifest that the Catholic Faith does not, in this

doctrine, propose to our belief anything impossible to God.

The triumph of the cross · 第 17 / 18 章