Our Professor

NO: he was no Professor in the recognised sense of the term; not a bit of

it. Neither can I tell you how he acquired the title, unless it were in

recognition of his original wit. He was simply my factotum or Man

Friday, ready for shooting, fishing, game-keeping, or gardening, as the

emergency of the moment required. He could neither read nor write. But

what are trifling details like these in comparison with ’cuteness.

Institute a Tripos for originality and native wit, and Matthew would even

now, at the age of seventy, pass with high honours. But the examination

must be strictly _viva voce_, and not allowed to wander into the region

of conventional knowledge.

“Matthew,” I said, “this isn’t work,” as I bestowed a kick upon an object

that lay prone upon the lawn, when it ought to have been digging at our

garden border.

“No, sir; but it’s _preparin_’ for it,” was the prompt reply. For

myself, I was knocked out of time, though I felt I was clearly within my

rights. Fancy a man, roused from a peaceful siesta, being ready with a

retort of such preternatural smartness!

Unhappily Matthew had two failings, by which his career was handicapped.

He was always lazy, and sometimes inebriate. Of the former he never

repented so long as I knew him; the latter he was always repenting of and

always repeating. And the stage of repentance was the more acute and the

more grievous, at any rate to his neighbours. After a bout of drinking

he would wander through the house with his hands on the pit of his

stomach—as if the seat of his iniquity lay there—moaning in a dreary,

exasperating way, “The Lord forgie I; I’ll never be drunk agin.” “How

can you _expect_ him to?” said his wife, in a tone of the bitterest

sarcasm.

Every time he repented he took the pledge anew. The consequence was, his

bosom was garnished with blue ribbons—his “decorations” he called

them—for he never cast off one when he assumed another, but regarded them

as an old soldier does his medals, traces of many a scar and many a

conflict, in which, unhappily, he always fell.

“Decorations!” said his wife, “fine decorations! Call ’em rather

sign-posts along the road to perdition. If you stick to ’em all when

you’re buried, they’ll have no trouble in fixing _your_ whereabouts.”

Sometimes, when he was particularly exasperating, she would take the law

in her own hands. “My head’s swimmin’ like a tee-total,” Matthew would

say pathetically. “The very last thing it ought to swim like,” retorted

his wife, a woman with a ready wit, “but I’ll soon make it do so.” And

with that she would take him in her strong arms and give him a twist, as

boys do when they give its first impetus to a top, after which she would

wait patiently for the result. The result was, of course, collapse as

soon as the primary impulse had run down; whereupon she would catch him

up when he was on the point of falling, and bear him off to repentance

and bed.

Matthew’s dialect was unique. I question whether a specialist could have

reproduced it in its integrity, if only because it never reached

finality, but was always in process of development. For myself, I had

studied it for years, and could never get any nearer towards the

discovery of its principles. Every day he was startling you with some

new combination, as a rule strictly ungrammatical, but often a reversion

to some lost or more accurate phraseology. For example: “Let I go,”

“Would you like I to do it”?—the latter a reproduction, as near as may

be, of the Latin formula _visne ego faciam_? A still more perplexing

characteristic in his speech was that he used many of his words in a

variety of senses.

“Cuss they nigglin’ weeds,” he’d say, and “Cuss my nigglin’

toothache”—phrases in which the adjective (or participle) carried an

appreciable meaning, even when he didn’t add the word “darn’d” as an

explanatory gloss. But when he transferred the phrase a minute

afterwards to a splendid crop of potatoes, in which my inexperienced eye

could detect no possible fault, I was all at sea again, and had to ask

him to explain himself.

“I means they’m small,” he answered, with a contemptuous sniff at my

ignorance.

“But, Matthew, you told me just now that ‘nigglin’’ meant ‘darn’d.’”

“And so it do—darn’d small;” looking at me as if he thought the epithet

suited me as much as the potatoes.

When Matthew had pneumonia and lay _in extremis_, his friends came round

to console him with the assurance that he would die at the turn of the

tide.

“What time, Matthew, do ’en begin to turn?” they said.

“At seven o’clock, ezzactly,” whispered the inveterate old humorist. And

it was not till the next morning they discovered that he had defrauded

them of one whole hour of pleasant anticipation.

In his sober moments Matthew was a brilliant story-teller (in both

senses, I fear); though his brilliancy now is limited to occasional

flashes of wit. The following is one of his best reminiscences. I have

selected it out of many because I have since discovered that it was

founded on fact. Not only was it authenticated by a clergyman in whose

neighbourhood it was enacted, but it was told and re-told by one of the

actors in the tragedy, though he had passed to a land from which no

testimony is available long before I heard the story at second-hand from

Matthew.

“’Twas in December, 1824, that it happened. So Joseph told I.” (This,

at any rate, was Matthew’s recognised formula.) “’Tis true he were a

great liar, and I didn’t take no count o’ the main o’ his tales; for he’d

tell you most anything, he would; ’specially if he see’d the price of a

glass of fourpenny for tellin’ it. But, in proof ’tis true, they’d tell

it to the childer at night time, when they was obstrepulous and wouldn’t

go to bed—just for a joke like, to fright ’em to sleep.

“’Twas in December, 1824; and not likely he were to forget it. For ’twas

the year of the great gale (the ‘Outrage’ they calls it hereabouts), when

the sea broke clean over Rudge and washed away th’ old church, all but

the chancel. Joseph never took kindly-like to the new church they built

for ’en higher up i’ the valley, out o’ reach o’ the sea. ’Twas too

spick and span, he said, to suit he—all white and glitterin’ like

chalk—though ’twere built of the best Portland stone, and a sight

prettier to my thinkin’ than the tumble down old barn that’s all that’s

left o’ th’ old un. But the visitors and gentry, they takes after

Joseph, and for one what goes to see the new church there’s hundreds ’ll

bring their vittles and sit and peant th’ old ’un—studyin’ all the

tombstones, and what’s writ on ’em—mostly shipwrecks it be, for I doubt

if there’s half-a-dozen stones in th’ old grave-yard but what tells of

someone or t’other who was drownded at sea. In that one gale of ’24

’twas thousands that perished, and all that was found on ’em Joseph

buried there, when the sea gived back her dead, and he could get at his

grave-yard. Though, to be sure, nought was left but the chancel, so you

could scarce say as how, poor souls, they got a decent buryin’.

“Anyhow ’twas in that very month, just arter the ‘Outrage,’ that one

Price—a farmer he called hisself—was livin’ high up yonder among they

hills that you can see faint-like in the distance, nigh agin they ricks.

A bleak and dreary place it were at the best o’ times, and a job to get

at it at all when a strong so’wester were blowin’. And most every

November it _do_ blow cruel strong along they high downs, wi’ no cover to

speak on’t ’cept scraps of fuz and heather, and a small thorn tree, may

be, now and agin, wi’ ’is branches all leanin’ to the nor’-east, as

though ’twas an old man a holdin’ out his arms for shelter. And the road

to Price’s farm were no better nor a sheep run. A godless man Price

were, as you’d expect wi’ a man who lived so far from all we decent

folks. And he never com’d nigh no church. Passon, he said, didn’t suit

he, and he weren’t a goin’ to trapeze over hill and dale—not he—when

chance ’twas he’d find no passon and no service at t’other end. And if

passon went to he—as he did now and agin—he’d find the door shut in his

face. And for vittles—not a bite nor a sup of anything did he offer ’en,

though passon was a rare ’un at that kind of work. Sunday after Sunday

he’d look in reg’lar nigh about dinner time, and savour by his nose, he

would, where there was a chance for ’en of summat enticin’. Not but what

’twere bad for the childer where he _did_ settle hisself, for ’twas

little of the pudden was left for they when he’d a’ had his turn on’t.

“Howsomever, ’twas there Price lived, wi’ hisself for his company. So no

wonder strange tales got abroad about ’m. ’Twas said, though Joseph

never gived no heed to ’t, that three wives had entered his doors, and

never one of ’em had come out agin—no, not for buryin’. And Joseph must

have known on’t if so be they had, seein’ he were clerk and sexton and

grave-digger, let alone the head o’ the choir. ’Twas thought that he’d

buried ’em in another parish, more nigher to the house he lived in, and

wi’ a better road ’long which to carry ’em. But, Lord save us! tweren’t

nothin’ of the kind.

“One morning, early in December, ’twas nine o’ the clock, may be, or

thereabouts—for Joseph had just been out to pen the sheep in the

church-yard—a tall fine old genelman called at the door, and he knowed by

his dress ’twere the Bishop. Not that he’d cast eyes on ’en before, for

our youngsters are confirmed a way off; there baint enough of them to

claim a Bishop for theirselves. But he knowed ’twere the Bishop, what

wi’ his gaiters, fittin’ as though they’d grow’d to his legs, and his

broad hat as shiny as if you’d smoothed it wi’ a flat iron.

“‘Good morning to you,’ says he, as pleasant as anyone could say it.

‘You be clerk of the parish, baint you?’ ‘True, your wusshup,’ he

replied. ‘And sexton too’ says he. ‘Right you be; and grave-digger and

choir leader as well,’ for he thought it no sin to make the most to ’m of

his preferments. ‘Well,’ says he, ‘I want you for a buryin’—this night

at eight o’clock.’ ‘A buryin’, your wusshup,’ says he, ‘and at night?’

‘Yes, and three on ’em,’ says he, ‘all in one grave.’ ‘Well, it _do_

sound mortial strange, your wusshup, but ’tis you that says it, and not

I.’ ‘You’d better go at once,’ he says, ‘and begin the grave, for you

won’t have none too much time to spare on’t, ’specially as I want it done

on the quiet, so to speak, and you mustn’t take no hand to help you, and

meet me punctually as ever is at eight o’clock at Farmer Price’s, up

along the hill, and bring a lantern and the parish hand-bier ’long wi’

’e.’

“He hadn’t much time to ponder on it, as you may suppose, with that grave

to dig, and no one to gi’ ’m a helpin’ hand. And mortial hard work he

found it, too, for the frost set in early that year, and the ground that

hard that, young and lusty as he were, he found it a job to get the

pick-axe into ’en.

“Howsomever he did get ’en done, and at eight o’clock he was at Farmer

Price’s door, and ’twas opened to ’en by the Bishop hisself. And so,

hand in hand as you may say, he and the Bishop, they went into the

kitchen. And there right facin’ ’em—packed up agin the wall like so many

old grandfeyther clocks—stood three coffins, with a piece of glass let in

’em to show the face, and a dead woman in each!

“Close handy they were to ’m when he took his meals, or smoked his pipe;

and when he felt a bit lonesome (so he told Joseph) he’d go up to ’em and

ask ’em how they did, and if they felt comferable. And fresh as peant

they were, too: only a bit shrivelled, like as ’twere an apple in April.

Perhaps ’twas the heat of the kitchen, or may be some stuff he’d put in

along wi’ ’em; anyhow you could see their faces right enough and tell

they was women.

“‘Take ’em down,’ says the Bishop; ‘Farmer Price’ll lend ’e a helpin’

hand: and we’ve none too much time to get ’em back to the churchyard and

bury ’em.’ Joseph hisself could scarce do nought but stare at ’em. To

think that that godless man had kep’ ’em there—one on ’em for nigh on ten

years—never thinkin’, not he, that he was keepin’ ’em tied hand and foot

to this world, with never no chance of a resurrection till he took it

into his wicked head to let ’em go. And there they’d a’ been for ten

years longer—for just so long he lived—if Bishop hisself hadn’t got wind

on’t and come down right away to bury ’em.

“Anyhow they _did_ get decent burial—the three on ’em—at last. For they

had Bishop, and Joseph and Farmer Price; though I don’t take no count o’

he, ’cept that he helped to lower ’em and fill in the grave.

“But Joseph were right glad, he were—and so he told I—to see the rare tug

he had in draggin’ they three dead women up hill and down hill ’cross to

the church-yard. For Joseph never gived ’en no helpin’ hand—you may take

your oath on’t—though he did make a show of pushin’ at the bier

whensomever the Bishop looked his way.

“Didn’t no one never hear on’t? Yes, they did. But they didn’t take no

count on’t. Our people baint over wise about religion, and things were

done in those days that’d make a rare potheration now. Besides, you see,

Bishop were there, and he made a sight o’ difference. ’Twas a rare fine

buryin’, people thought, wi’ a Bishop to put you unnerground; though ’tis

true he hadn’t his fine gran’ toggery on, and his girt white sleeves.”

* * * * *

The actors in our humble drama are dead and gone. The Bishop and Price

and Joseph have, each in his turn, been followed to the grave, only with

less eccentric rites. But the story of the farmer’s “Happy Family” still

lingers in the village, and is told and re-told round many a cottage

hearth under the quaint but significant title of “Price’s Menagerie.”

* * * * *

P.S. The “Professor” himself came round to-day—“for a pipe of baccy,

Sir, if you have such a thing about you”—so I have utilised him to

correct his own proof sheets. “There baint nothin’ wrong in ’em,

_Master_ Fred (this to a man of sixty!), so fur as I sees. Only you says

‘gived’ where I says ‘gi’ed.’ But taint no odds. Like enough they’ll

guess what you means whatsomever you writes down.” Thanks, Matthew, for

your tribute to my clearness of expression.

Ronald and I; or, Studies from Life · 第 28 / 35 题