ROBERT EMMET.”

This letter was written at twelve o’clock on the day of Mr. Emmet’s

execution, and the firmness and regularity of the original hand-writing

contains a striking and affecting proof of the little influence which

the approaching event exerted over his frame. The same enthusiasm which

allured him to his destiny, enabled him to support its utmost rigour. He

met his fate with unostentatious fortitude; and although few will be

found bold enough to justify his projects since they were unsuccessful,

yet his youth, his talents, the great respectability of his connections,

and the evident delusion of which he was the victim, have excited more

general sympathy for his unfortunate end, and more forbearance towards

his memory, than is usually extended to the errors or sufferings of

political offenders.

What brought forth this wonderful effort of a young gentleman, unaided

and unsupported by any rational system of organization, uncountenanced

but by the humblest men in society, relying on his own great energies,

and the thousand circumstances which chance might throw up on the

surface of the political ocean? What animated the mind and spirit of

Emmet, night after night, and day after day? What? His enemies will say

it was ambition, a hope of personal aggrandizement, and a speculation of

personal exaltation, a sanguinary purpose to raise himself on the ruins

of all that was respected and cherished in society. To such enemies we

will reply that, if ever an enthusiast was animated with a pure and

unadulterated sentiment of the most disinterested anxiety for the

freedom of his native country—if ever there was a human being who was

ready to lay down his life for the comfort and happiness of his

fellow-creatures—if ever there was a heart that sincerely sympathised

with the sufferings of mankind, or that would cheerfully devote itself

at the altar, if such a sacrifice could procure the liberty of

Ireland—Robert Emmet was that man.

With an intellect of the highest order, eloquence powerful, commanding,

and inexhaustible; an integrity which no force could bend; a spirit

which no danger or suffering could intimidate; born of parents who were

the pride and boast of their country; the brother of those men who in

the birth-day of Ireland’s freedom, illuminated the political firmament,

and gave their country a hope that her freedom would be immortal; the

witness of her fall, and the spectator of her degradation, he gave

himself up to the dreams of his own imagination, and thought he saw the

liberties of his country achieved before he had formed his plan to

secure them. With all the customary characteristics of an enthusiast, he

seemed to disdain those humble calculations by which all human objects

are to be obtained. But Emmet achieved what no other man but himself

would have dared to attempt. With his single mind, and single arm, he

organized thousands of his countrymen, and besieged the government of

the country in their strongest position.

Mr. Emmet was executed on the day following that of his sentence, in

Thomas-street, at the head of Bridgefoot Street, opposite Catherine’s

church.

Robert Emmet, the lofty-minded patriot—the amiable enthusiast—the

warm-hearted friend, and ardent lover is no more! The hand of the

executioner extinguished the fire and energy of that soul, which burned

for his country’s good; and that tongue, of the purest and sublimest

eloquence, is now for ever mute.

He died as he lived, with heroic fearlessness, and decent fortitude. The

amiable, though enthusiastic Emmet, however, we hope has not died in

vain; our rulers must learn from his history that a people without

confidence is a moral Hydra, never to be deprived of the means of doing

mischief. The head of one rebellion is no sooner lopped off than another

is generated. The Hercules, who is to annihilate the monster, can only

be found in those acts of wisdom and justice, which are to reconcile the

people to their rulers, by making them freemen.

The fate of Robert Emmet demanded something more than tears, and

unprofitable as these may have been, we have continued to offer them

still to his memory. But let our private sorrows pass; history one day

will do him justice; we have thrown our mite in the scale in which his

reputation yet trembles; and, inadequate as that may be, it is sincere

and impartial. All ye who knew him in “his hour of pride,” go and do

likewise.

The following is extracted from a letter addressed to Mr. Rufus King

from T. A. Emmet, brother to Robert Emmet, on the subject of Mr. King’s

interference with the British government, as ambassador from the United

States, to prevent the Irish state prisoners of 1798 from emigrating to

America:—

“Sir,—In the commencement of our negociation, Lord Castlereagh

declared, as a reason for acceding to government’s possessing a

negative on our choice, that it had no worse place in view for our

emigration than the United States of America. We had made our election

to go there, and called upon him to have our agreement carried into

execution. In that difficulty, you, sir, afforded very effectual

assistance to the faithlessness of the British cabinet. On the 16th of

September, Mr. Marsden, then Under Secretary, came to inform us that

Mr. King had remonstrated against our being permitted to emigrate to

America. This astonished us all, and Dr. M Neven very plainly said

that he considered this as a mere trick between Mr. King and the

British Government. This Mr. Marsden denied, and on being pressed to

know what reason Mr. King could have for preventing us, who were

avowed republicans, from emigrating to America, he significantly

answered, ‘Perhaps Mr. King does not desire to have republicans in

America.’ Your interference was then, sir, made the pretext of

detaining us for four years in custody, by which very extensive and

useful plans of settlement within these states were broken up. The

misfortunes which you brought upon the objects of your persecution

were incalculable. Almost all of us wasted four of the best years of

our lives in prison. As to me, I should have brought along with me my

father and his family, including a brother, whose name perhaps even

you will not read without emotions of sympathy and respect. Others

nearly connected with me would have come partners in my emigration.

But all of them have been torn from me. I have been prevented from

saving a brother, from receiving the dying blessings of a father,

mother, and sister, and from soothing their last agonies by my cares;

and this, sir, by your unwarrantable, unprecedented, and unfeeling

interference. Your friends, when they accuse me of want of moderation

towards you, are wonderfully mistaken. They do not reflect, or know,

that I have never spoken of you without suppressing, as I do now,

personal feelings that rise up within me, and swell my heart with

indignation and resentment. The step you took was unauthorised by your

own government. Whether our conduct in Ireland was right or wrong, you

have no justification for yours. The constitution and laws of this

country gave you no power to require of the British government that it

should violate its faith, and withdraw from us its consent to the

place we had fixed upon for our voluntary emigration; neither the

president nor you were warranted to prevent our touching these

shores.—These remarks I address, with all becoming respect, to ‘the

first man in the country.’ Yet in fact, sir, I do not clearly see in

what consists your superiority over myself. It is true you have been a

resident minister at the court of St. James’; and, if what I have read

in the public prints be true, and if you be apprised of my near

relationship and family connexion with the late Sir John Temple, you

must acknowledge that your interference as resident minister at the

court of St. James’s, against my being permitted to emigrate to

America, is a very curious instance of the caprice of fortune—but let

that pass. To what extent I ought to yield to you for talents and

information, is not for me to decide.—In no respect, however, do I

feel your excessive superiority.—My private conduct and character are,

I hope, as fair as yours—and even in those matters which I consider as

trivial, but upon which aristocratic pride is accustomed to stamp a

value, I should not be inclined to shrink from competition. My birth

certainly will not humble me by the comparison; my paternal fortune

was, probably, much greater than yours; the consideration in which the

name I bear in my native country was held, was as great as yours is

ever likely to be before I had an opportunity of contributing to its

celebrity.

“As to the amount of what private fortune I have been able to save

from the wreck of calamity it is unknown to you or to your friends;

but two thingy I will tell you:—I never was indebted, either in the

country from which I came, nor in any other in which I have lived, to

any man, further than the necessary credit for the current expenses of

a family; and am not so circumstanced that I should tremble “for my

subsistence” at the threatened displeasure of your friends. So much

for the past and present—now for the future. Circumstances which

cannot be controlled, have decided that my name must be embodied into

history. From the manner in which even my political adversaries, and

some of my contemporary historians, unequivocally hostile to my

principles, already speak of me, I have the consolation of reflecting,

that when the falsehoods of the day are withered and rotten, I shall

be respected and esteemed.—You, sir, will probably be forgotten, when

I shall be remembered with honour, or if, peradventure, your name

should descend to posterity, perhaps you will be known only as the

recorded instrument of part of my persecutions, sufferings, and

misfortunes.

The life, trial and conversations of Robert Emmet, Esq., leader of the Irish insurrection of 1803 · 第 2 / 11 题