We pass now from the monastic circle to that of the learned book
collectors before and after the Dissolution. Many of the best medieval
book-buyers were Abbots or Priors, and the history of their collections
is merged in that of their abbeys. Leaving them aside, we find in
fourteenth-century England one name which everyone has heard--that of
Richard de Bury, Bishop of Durham, and author of the _Philobiblion_. I
am inclined to think that he was a humbug; his book is of the kind that
it is proper to translate, print on hand-made paper, and bind in a
vellum wrapper, but it tells us just nothing of what books De Bury had
or read, and I could not point to a single work of any importance which
he was instrumental in bringing to light or preserving. Persons who take
pains to advertise themselves as book-lovers or bibliomaniacs are rarely
those who render great services to literature.
Perhaps the libraries of the pre-Reformation colleges of Oxford and
Cambridge are the best hunting-grounds for traces of the early
collectors. At Peterhouse, Cambridge is a large bequest from John
Warkworth, Master late in the fifteenth century; another from J.
Dyngley, Fellow, whose books were written expressly for him; yet another
from H. Deynman, Master, who was interested in medicine. Here, too, we
come upon the tracks of Roger Marchall, who must rank, on the whole, as
a student of natural science. Books with his name and his carefully
written tables of contents are at Peterhouse, Gonville and Caius,
Lambeth, the British Museum, King's College; one at Magdalene College
(Pepys Library) came thither from Peterhouse via Dr. John Dee. Walter
Crome was another fifteenth-century benefactor of the University Library
and of Gonville Hall, who, like Dyngley, had books written to his
order. These are Cambridge _data_. Just such another list could be made
out for some Oxford colleges, particularly Merton, Balliol, and New
College. In this Bishops William Rede of Chichester, and John Trillek of
Hereford, and William Gray of Ely, would figure prominently. The mention
of this last name will serve as a pretext for introducing the
Renaissance scholars. Gray, we saw, was one of those who dealt with
Vespasiano Bisticci of Florence, though not nearly all of the many MSS.
of his giving which are at Balliol are Italian-written; a good number
are by Flemish and German scribes. The other men to whom I alluded in
the same connection were for the most part benefactors of Oxford. John
Tiptoft, Earl of Worcester, beheaded in 1470 for treason, promised a
large gift of books to the University, but they never reached it, nor do
I know a single MS. to-day that was Tiptoft's property, though there can
be no doubt that he was a considerable book-buyer. Humphrey, Duke of
Gloucester (whom we are now forbidden to call "the Good"), did give the
University what was then a large library; his name is inseparably
associated with the great room of the Bodleian, but his books were swept
away in Edward VI.'s days. Some few have come back to their old home,
and others are in London and in Paris: twenty-nine is said to be the
total. He intended further gifts, but he was cut off in 1444, and it is
thought that one collection, perhaps his travelling library, was
diverted to King's College, Cambridge. It is certain that soon after
1450 that college possessed some 174 MSS., among which such titles as
Plato's _Republic_ in Latin and a Greek-English dictionary betray a
humanistic influence which is not likely to have been that of our
founder, Henry VI. Moreover, the only one of those MSS. that remains is
a Latin version of some orations of St. Athanasius, made by a secretary
of the Duke, and dedicated _to_ the Duke; and in the British Museum is
another volume of Athanasius translated by the same man, which actually
has Duke Humphrey's inscription in it. This is respectable evidence in
support of the King's College story.
William Flemming, Dean of Lincoln, and founder of Lincoln College,
Oxford, gave a number of books to that society which show him to have
been interested in the revival of learning; Greek MSS. are among them.
John Gunthorpe, Dean of Wells (d. 1498), is said by Leland to have
bequeathed the large collection he brought from Italy to Jesus College,
Cambridge. It is scattered and gone from there, but books of Gunthorpe's
survive in a good many libraries. One deserves special mention--a Latin
prose version of the Odyssey, which he picked up (not in Italy, though
it is an Italian book, but at Westminster) in 1475. Probably it was the
first copy of the Odyssey in any form that had come to this country
since Roman times, unless, indeed, Archbishop Theodore brought one over
in the seventh century. Archbishop Parker thought that he had, and the
MS. which he fondly believed to be Theodore's was in his view the pearl
of the collection he left to Corpus Christi. Certainly it has the name
_Theodorus_ in it in letters of gold; but, as certainly, it is a
fifteenth-century book, and the Theodore for whom it was written was I
believe Theodore Gaza, a humanist who lived in Italy.
An instance of a man interested in books and not unaffected by the
Renaissance, though not himself a collector, may be introduced here.
William Wyrcestre (or Botoner, or Worcester) is the man, and he deserves
a special study. Some have called him the father of English antiquaries,
in virtue of one of his notebooks which has been preserved, and which
contains jottings about his travels in England; it is a sort of rude
elementary Leland's _Itinerary_. It is by no means the only book of his
compiling, nor the only one owned by him that we have. There are
historical and literary collections of his, and not a few MSS. with his
name in them. He knew John Free, the translator (reputed) of Diodorus
Siculus, and he had read Cristoforo Buondelmonte's book on the islands
of the Greek archipelago.
A long list of the Elizabethan book-collectors could be made, but I
shall not attempt one here. Two libraries of the time, Sir Robert
Cotton's and Archbishop Parker's, stand out. The main object of both men
was to preserve English antiquities, and it is no exaggeration to say
that if these two collections, which together number less than 1,500
volumes, had been wiped out, the best things in our vernacular
literature and the pick of our chronicles would be unknown to us now. We
should have no _Beowulf_ or _Judith_, only inferior copies of the
Anglo-Saxon Chronicle and of Matthew Paris, no Layamon, no _Pearl_--not
to speak of the mass of invaluable State-papers gathered by Cotton, and
the Reformation documents and letters stored up by Parker. One touch of
blame rests on Sir Robert Cotton. He had a vicious habit of breaking up
MSS. and binding together sections from different volumes. This
disguises the provenance of the books, and by consequence obscures the
history of their contents.
Enough information about the Cotton and Parker MSS. is easily accessible
to absolve me from writing much about them here. Less is generally known
of two dispersed collections, those of John Bale and John Dee.
Bale must, I fear, have been an unamiable man--certainly a very queer
Christian. But his controversial works, on which he doubtless prided
himself most, are dead and very rotten, while those devoted to the more
peaceful science of bibliography are of abiding value. In his larger
one, _Scriptorum Britannicorum Centuriæ_, he inserts a list of the MSS.
he had once owned; they were no longer in his hands, but, it is to be
supposed, in Ireland, left there when he fled from his bishopric of
Ossory on Mary's accession. It is not a very scientific list, not one
that gives the contents of each volume, but merely names of treatises,
groups of which no doubt went to make up volumes, and this makes it
difficult to determine how much of his library is in existence now.
After his death it was in England, and a syndicate of Germans,
including, as was said above, Flacius Illyricus, were negotiating for
the purchase of it. Archbishop Parker also had an eye upon it; he had
received books as gifts or loans from Bale in former years. I have not
been able to make sure whether any of the books did actually go to the
Continent; I doubt it, in fact. Many distinguished by Bale's curious
small, "flat" handwriting are traceable among Cotton's and Parker's
books, at Lambeth, at Cambridge, and doubtless also at Oxford (where
there is at least the MS. of his _Index Scriptorum_, admirably edited by
Mr. R. L. Poole and Miss Bateson). Bale was a Carmelite in his youth and
interested in the history of his Order, and there is an _a priori_
probability that any book dealing with Carmelite affairs will contain
marks of his ownership.
Dr. John Dee's history has often been written, and the catalogue of the
MSS. he owned has long been in print in a Camden society volume (_Diary
of Dr. John Dee_) edited by Halliwell. The main facts of his life that
concern us are that he lived at Mortlake, and in 1584 went on a wild
journey to Poland. In his absence his house and collections were
plundered by a mob, who, not without excuse, thought him a warlock. When
he returned in 1589 he set himself to recover his scattered property,
and to a great extent succeeded. He moved from Mortlake to Manchester,
being made Warden of the college there in 1595; later on he returned,
and died at Mortlake, much in debt, I think, in 1608. I find from
Archbishop Ussher's printed correspondence that his books were still
unsold in 1624; litigation may have prevented their being dealt with
earlier. The lists we have of his MSS. date from before his foreign
tour; that which is in print was made on the eve of his departure, and
contains a little over 200 entries.
After the vicissitudes which his collection suffered it is remarkable
that one should still be able to identify as extant well over half of
it. I have been helped in my searches by certain marks--a little ladder,
or the astrological sign of Jupiter, or a [Greek: Delta]--which occur on
the first page of many. His handwriting, too, in notes, and certain
names of owners (particularly P. Saunders) are guides. Some of his MSS.
were bought by Ussher, and are at Trinity College, Dublin, and a few
were bought by Cotton. But the largest group of them is at Corpus
Christi College, Oxford. These were acquired by the great Oxford
antiquary, Brian Twyne, who hoped that his college would buy them from
him, but this they would not do. Happily Twyne was not too much hurt by
the refusal to leave them to the college at his death. I guess that one
reason for his buying them was that some (perhaps many) of them had once
belonged to his grandfather, John Twyne, a Canterbury man of some slight
eminence, who in his turn had secured a considerable "lot" of MSS. from
the library of St. Augustine's Abbey. In searching out the relics of
that great library I found the combination, or pedigree, St.
Augustine's--John Twyne--Dee--Brian Twyne--Corpus Christi, to be a
frequent one, and this set me upon a general investigation of Dee's MSS.
A little notebook of his at Corpus Christi showed that in early life he
had borrowed a number of MSS. from Peterhouse and from Queen's College,
Oxford. I did not find that these ever got back to their sources, but I
do not think that Dee was dishonest in the matter; I believe he was
allowed to keep them for some consideration received. Some of the
Peterhouse books are traceable in the Ashmole collection, the Pepys
Library, and the British Museum; of those of Queen's College I can say
nothing. Dee was specially interested in mathematics, alchemy, and, as
everyone knows, converse with spirits, but his library was not confined
to books on these subjects; he had some excellent historical, literary,
and theological MSS. One of them was the best copy of Alfred's
translation of Orosius.
Another library of the sixteenth century deserves to be singled out from
the many which offer themselves for notice. It is that of Lord Lumley
(d. 1609); he inherited the books from Henry Fitzalan, Earl of Arundel
(d. 1580). This collection had again been largely recruited from that of
Archbishop Cranmer: the combination T(homæ) C(ranmeri)
C(antuar)--Arundel--Lumley, is often found written on the lower margin
of the first leaf of the MSS. concerned. These Arundel MSS., by the way,
must not be confounded with the Arundel collection in the British
Museum, nor with that remnant of the same collection which is owned by
the College of Arms. The Arundel MSS., so-called, were collected largely
by Lord William Howard (Belted Will) of Naworth, passed on to Thomas,
Earl of Arundel (d. 1644), and devised by Henry Howard to the Royal
Society, 1681; they were eventually transferred by the Society to the
British Museum in 1831. The Arundel-Lumley books had a different
destiny. Most of them also came to the Museum, but by another path. They
were bought after Lumley's death by or for Prince Henry, eldest son of
James I., and added to the Royal Library, and that became national
property by the gift of George II. in 1757. We have a catalogue, made
about 1609, of the whole library, which is among the Gale MSS. at
Trinity College, Cambridge. It bears no name of owner, but is easily
seen to be Lumley's. Not all the MSS. that we find bearing Lumley's name
are in it, and not all the MSS. in it are in the old Royal Library. To
the second class belong the English Bible at Wolfenbüttel, the Bible of
Gundulf, Bishop of Rochester (a fine but plain book which is at
Cheltenham in the Phillipps collection), and the Bosworth Psalter bought
not long ago from a private owner by the British Museum. The first class
is more numerous; about twenty MSS. at Lambeth alone have Lumley's name,
but are not in his catalogue. I conjecture that they were presented by
Lumley (who was a generous giver of printed books to the Universities)
to Archbishop Bancroft when he was forming his collection.
So one might go on through Ussher, Laud, Selden, Rawlinson, Harley,
Askew, Drury, Heber, etc., to Sir Thomas Phillipps, whose 30,000 MSS.,
good and bad, must be the largest mass of such things ever owned by a
single collector. But I think I have said enough of the public and
private accumulations of this country to give an adequate idea of the
kind of results that attend research, and of the ways in which large
blocks of MSS. have been handed on to us. The epoch of the sale-room I
have not really touched; it demands special tools and a special
historian, and it concerns individual books. Nor, I will confess, do I
feel quite at ease in touching upon the private collections of the
present day. There is less objection to surveying such things when they
have passed as wholes into public institutions.
For example, the MSS. collected by the Earl of Crawford and Balcarres
were acquired in 1892 for the John Rylands Library at Manchester. The
Latin section of these I have had occasion to examine. It consists of
nearly 120 items. The earliest and most remarkable of these almost all
own the pedigree of Libri-Bateman-Crawford. Of Libri enough has been
said to make it necessary to note here that none of the Crawford MSS.
owned by him were pilfered from French libraries. The library of Bateman
of Youlgrave was dispersed in 1893; the Libri purchases in it are mostly
traceable in the Libri sale catalogue of 1859. Three tenth-century
Spanish MSS., two from the Abbey of S. Pedro de Cardeña, one from Silos,
happen, by an odd and lucky accident, to be elaborately described in
Berganza's _España Sagrada_; how it was that exactly these books came
into Libri's hands it is not likely that we shall discover. For the
rest, Lord Crawford's purchases at the Howell Wills sale of 1894 were
considerable in quantity, and he acquired three fine books at that of
Ambroise Firmin Didot in 1878. Three others came from the Bollandist
Fathers' Library at Brussels. One of these had for some years formed
part of the very choice collection of the Fountaines at Narford, in
Norfolk, scattered in 1894.
Of less choice quality, but of extreme usefulness to the student, are
the 200 MSS. bequeathed by Frank McClean in 1904 to the Fitzwilliam
Museum at Cambridge, and collected by him in the ten or fifteen years
before that. Here we have few coherent groups of books, unless we reckon
as such a certain number of volumes from the Cistercian Abbey of
Morimund in North Italy, acquired singly, perhaps, by Mr. McClean from
Hoepli of Milan. The Phillipps sales account for a good many, the
Barrois and Ashburnham Appendix (1901 and 1897) for a few more, but most
of the books were picked up one by one in auction-rooms or from dealers'
catalogues.
In both these cases examples of illumination and calligraphy have been
primary objects in the collectors' eyes, and that is the ruling passion
with most of those who buy MSS. nowadays. At the beginning of the
nineteenth century what was more coveted was the accumulation of copies
of the classics. It had hardly been realized that few of the Renaissance
classical MSS. made in Italy have independent textual value, and
collectors like Askew, Drury, Canonici, Burney, thought that the more of
them they had the better. Lord Fitzwilliam (d. 1816), who devoted
himself to buying French Books of Hours for the sake of the pictures,
was something of a pioneer (at least in England) in this respect.
Francis Douce (d. 1834) was another; his treasures are in the Bodleian.
As for Sir Thomas Phillipps, he must have bought by the cart-load:
_Nihil manu scriptum a se alienum putabat_. In spite of the large amount
of rubbish among his 30,000 odd volumes, I can never hear without a
bitter pang the tale that the University of Oxford many years ago shied
at his offer of them, accompanied as it was by some tiresome conditions;
their fate has been gradual dispersion to every part of Europe and to
America.
I have said that I cannot embark here upon the history of sales of MSS.
in the last hundred years. But my abstention, due to considerations of
space, must not be imitated by my readers. Those who deal with modern
collections or make collections of their own--a thing still possible for
quite modest purses, in spite of the inflated prices which the great
books command--are not absolved from the study of sale catalogues; that
they will pay attention to book-plates, bindings, and names of owners, I
need not repeat. The list of such catalogues issued by the British
Museum they will find invaluable; the catalogues themselves, alike those
of dealers and of sales, will often enable them to trace a particular
MS. back through a whole century to some Italian palace or Flemish
abbey, sold up or secularized under the stress of revolution. This
period of MS. history has been less well worked than the earlier ones;
it is but just ripening, in fact; but to anyone who is bitten with the
passion for the books it will prove just as fascinating as the others.