CHAPTER V

OF CONSCIENCE

The Sieur de la Brousse, my brother, and I, travelling one day together

during the time of our civil wars, met a gentleman of good sort. He was

of the contrary party, though I did not know so much, for he pretended

otherwise: and the mischief on't is, that in this sort of war the cards

are so shuffled, your enemy not being distinguished from yourself by any

apparent mark either of language or habit, and being nourished under the

same law, air, and manners, it is very hard to avoid disorder and

confusion. This made me afraid myself of meeting any of our troops in a

place where I was not known, that I might not be in fear to tell my name,

and peradventure of something worse; as it had befallen me before, where,

by such a mistake, I lost both men and horses, and amongst others an

Italian gentleman my page, whom I bred with the greatest care and

affection, was miserably slain, in whom a youth of great promise and

expectation was extinguished. But the gentleman my brother and I met

had so desperate, half-dead a fear upon him at meeting with any horse,

or passing by any of the towns that held for the King, that I at last

discovered it to be alarms of conscience. It seemed to the poor man as

if through his visor and the crosses upon his cassock, one would have

penetrated into his bosom and read the most secret intentions of his

heart; so wonderful is the power of conscience. It makes us betray,

accuse, and fight against ourselves, and for want of other witnesses, to

give evidence against ourselves:

"Occultum quatiens animo tortore flagellum."

["The torturer of the soul brandishing a sharp scourge within."

--Juvenal, iii. 195.]

This story is in every child's mouth: Bessus the Paeonian, being

reproached for wantonly pulling down a nest of young sparrows and killing

them, replied, that he had reason to do so, seeing that those little

birds never ceased falsely to accuse him of the murder of his father.

This parricide had till then been concealed and unknown, but the

revenging fury of conscience caused it to be discovered by him himself,

who was to suffer for it. Hesiod corrects the saying of Plato, that

punishment closely follows sin, it being, as he says, born at the same

time with it. Whoever expects punishment already suffers it, and whoever

has deserved it expects it. Wickedness contrives torments against

itself:

"Malum consilium consultori pessimum."

["Ill designs are worst to the contriver."

--Apud Aul. Gellium, iv. 5.]

as the wasp stings and hurts another, but most of all itself, for it

there loses its sting and its use for ever,

"Vitasque in vulnere ponunt."

["And leave their own lives in the wound."

--Virgil, Geo., iv. 238.]

Cantharides have somewhere about them, by a contrariety of nature, a

counterpoison against their poison. In like manner, at the same time

that men take delight in vice, there springs in the conscience a

displeasure that afflicts us sleeping and waking with various tormenting

imaginations:

"Quippe ubi se multi, per somnia saepe loquentes,

Aut morbo delirantes, protraxe ferantur,

Et celata diu in medium peccata dedisse."

["Surely where many, often talking in their sleep, or raving in

disease, are said to have betrayed themselves, and to have given

publicity to offences long concealed."--Lucretius, v. 1157.]

Apollodorus dreamed that he saw himself flayed by the Scythians and

afterwards boiled in a cauldron, and that his heart muttered these words

"I am the cause of all these mischiefs that have befallen thee."

Epicurus said that no hiding-hole could conceal the wicked, since they

could never assure themselves of being hid whilst their conscience

discovered them to themselves.

"Prima est haec ultio, quod se

Judice nemo nocens absohitur."

["Tis the first punishment of sin that no man absolves himself." or:

"This is the highest revenge, that by its judgment no offender is

absolved."--Juvenal, xiii. 2.]

As an ill conscience fills us with fear, so a good one gives us greater

confidence and assurance; and I can truly say that I have gone through

several hazards with a more steady pace in consideration of the secret

knowledge I had of my own will and the innocence of my intentions:

"Conscia mens ut cuique sua est, ita concipit intra

Pectora pro facto spemque metumque suo."

["As a man's conscience is, so within hope or fear prevails, suiting

to his design."--Ovid, Fast., i. 485.]

Of this are a thousand examples; but it will be enough to instance three

of one and the same person. Scipio, being one day accused before the

people of Rome of some crimes of a very high nature, instead of excusing

himself or flattering his judges: "It will become you well," said he,

"to sit in judgment upon a head, by whose means you have the power to

judge all the world." Another time, all the answer he gave to several

impeachments brought against him by a tribune of the people, instead of

making his defence: "Let us go, citizens," said he, "let us go render

thanks to the gods for the victory they gave me over the Carthaginians as

this day," and advancing himself before towards the Temple, he had

presently all the assembly and his very accuser himself following at his

heels. And Petilius, having been set on by Cato to demand an account of

the money that had passed through his hands in the province of Antioch,

Scipio being come into the senate to that purpose, produced a book from

under his robe, wherein he told them was an exact account of his receipts

and disbursements; but being required to deliver it to the prothonotary

to be examined, he refused, saying, he would not do himself so great a

disgrace; and in the presence of the whole senate tore the book with his

own hands to pieces. I do not believe that the most seared conscience

could have counterfeited so great an assurance. He had naturally too

high a spirit and was accustomed to too high a fortune, says Titius

Livius, to know how to be criminal, and to lower himself to the meanness

of defending his innocence. The putting men to the rack is a dangerous

invention, and seems to be rather a trial of patience than of truth.

Both he who has the fortitude to endure it conceals the truth, and he who

has not: for why should pain sooner make me confess what really is, than

force me to say what is not? And, on the contrary, if he who is not

guilty of that whereof he is accused, has the courage to undergo those

torments, why should not he who is guilty have the same, so fair a reward

as life being in his prospect? I believe the ground of this invention

proceeds from the consideration of the force of conscience: for, to the

guilty, it seems to assist the rack to make him confess his fault and to

shake his resolution; and, on the other side, that it fortifies the

innocent against the torture. But when all is done, 'tis, in plain

truth, a trial full of uncertainty and danger what would not a man say,

what would not a man do, to avoid so intolerable torments?

"Etiam innocentes cogit mentiri dolor."

["Pain will make even the innocent lie."--Publius Syrus, De Dolore.]

Whence it comes to pass, that him whom the judge has racked that he may

not die innocent, he makes him die both innocent and racked. A thousand

and a thousand have charged their own heads by false confessions, amongst

whom I place Philotas, considering the circumstances of the trial

Alexander put upon him and the progress of his torture. But so it is

that some say it is the least evil human weakness could invent; very

inhumanly, notwithstanding, and to very little purpose, in my opinion.

Many nations less barbarous in this than the Greeks and Romans who call

them so, repute it horrible and cruel to torment and pull a man to pieces

for a fault of which they are yet in doubt. How can he help your

ignorance? Are not you unjust, that, not to kill him without cause, do

worse than kill him? And that this is so, do but observe how often men

prefer to die without reason than undergo this examination, more painful

than execution itself; and that oft-times by its extremity anticipates

execution, and perform it. I know not where I had this story, but it

exactly matches the conscience of our justice in this particular. A

country-woman, to a general of a very severe discipline, accused one of

his soldiers that he had taken from her children the little soup meat she

had left to nourish them withal, the army having consumed all the rest;

but of this proof there was none. The general, after having cautioned

the woman to take good heed to what she said, for that she would make

herself guilty of a false accusation if she told a lie, and she

persisting, he presently caused the soldier's belly to be ripped up to

clear the truth of the fact, and the woman was found to be right. An

instructive sentence.

Essays of Michel de Montaigne — Volume 09 · 第 5 / 6 章