3. This punishment must be terrible. How doth David, a great {b449}

king, sound in his body, prosperous in his crown, and successful in

his conquests, settled in all his royal conveniences, groan under the

wrathful touch of a greater King than himself (Ps. vi. xxxviii., and

his other penitential Psalms), not being able to give himself a writ

of ease by all the delights of his palace and kingdom! “If the wrath of

a king be as the roaring of a lion” (Prov. xix. 10) to a poor subject,

how great is the wrath of the King of kings, that cannot be set forth

by the terror of all the amazing volleys of thunder that have been

since the creation, if the noise of all were gathered into one single

crack! As there is an inconceivable ground of joy in the special favor

of so mighty a King, so is there of terror in his severe displeasure:

he is “terrible to the kings of the earth; with God is terrible

majesty” (Ps. lxxvi. 12). What a folly is it, then, to rebel against

so mighty a Sovereign!

_Use III._ Of comfort. The throne of God drops honey and sweetness, as

well as dread and terror; all his other attributes afford little relief

without this of his dominion and universal command. When, therefore,

he speaks of his being the God of his people, he doth often preface it

with “the Lord thy God;” his sovereignty, as a Lord, being the ground

of all the comfort we can take in his federal relation as our God;

thy God, but superior to thee; thy God, not as thy cattle and goods

are thine, in a way of sole propriety, but a Lord too, in a way of

sovereignty, not only over thee, but over all things else for thee. As

the end of God’s settling earthly governments was for the good of the

communities over which the governors preside, so God exerciseth his

government for the good of the world, and more particularly for the

good of the church, over which he is a peculiar Governor.

1. His love to his people is as great as his sovereignty over them.

He stands not upon his dominion with his people so much as upon his

affection to them; he would not be called “Baali, my Lord,” _i. e._

he would not be known only by the name of sovereignty, but “Ishi, my

husband,” a name of authority and sweetness together (Hos. ii. 16,

19, &c.): he signifies that he is not only the Lord of our spirits and

bodies, but a husband by a marriage knot, admitting us to a nearness to

him, and communion of goods with him. Though he majestically sits upon

a high throne, yet it is a throne “encircled with a rainbow” (Ezek. i.

28), to show that his government of his people is not only in a way of

absolute dominion, but also in a way of federal relation; he seems to

own himself their subject rather than their Sovereign, when he gives

them a charter to command him in the affairs of his church (Isa. xlv.

11); “Ask of me things to come concerning my sons, and concerning the

work of my hands command you me.” Some read it by way of question, as

a corrective of a sauciness: Do you ask me of things to come, and seem

to command me concerning the works of my hands, as if you were more

careful of my interest among my people than I am, who have formed them?

But if this were the sense, it would seem to discourage an importunity

of prayer for public deliverance; and therefore, to take it according

to our translation, it is an exhortation to prayer, and a mighty

encouragement in the management and exercise of it. Urge {b450} me

with my promise, in a way of humble importunity, and you shall find

me as willing to perform my word, and gratify your desires, as if I

were rather under your authority, than you under mine: as much as to

say, If I be not as good as my word, to satisfy those desires that

are according to my promise, implead me at my own throne, and, if

I be failing in it, I will give judgment against myself: almost like

princes’ charters, and gracious grants, “We grant such a thing against

us and our heirs,” giving the subject power to implead them if they

be not punctually observed by them. How is the love of God seen in

his condescension below the majesty of earthy governors! He that might

command, by the absoluteness of his authority, doth not only do that,

but entreats, in the quality of a subject, as if he had not a fulness

to supply us, but needed something from us for a supply of himself

(2 Cor. v. 20): “As though God did beseech you by us.” And when he may

challenge, as a due by the right of his propriety, what we bestow upon

his poor, which are his subjects as well as ours, he reckons it as a

loan to him, as if what we had were more our own than his (Prov. xix.

17). He stands not upon his dominion so much with us, when he finds us

conscientious in paying the duty we owe to him; he rules as a Father,

by love as well as by authority; he enters into a peculiar communion

with poor earthly worms, plants his gracious tabernacle among the

troops of sinners, instructs us by his word, invites us by his benefits,

admits us into his presence, is more desirous to bestow his smiles than

we to receive them, and acts in such a manner as if he were willing to

resign his sceptre into the hands of any that were possessed with more

love and kindness to us than himself: this is the comfort of believers.

2. In his being Sovereign, his pardons carry in them a full security.

He that hath the keys of hell and death, pardons the crime, and wipes

off the guilt. Who can repeal the act of the chief Governor? what

tribunal can null the decrees of an absolute throne? (Isa. xliii. 25),

“I, even I, am he that blots out thy transgressions, for my name’s

sake.” His sovereign dominion renders his mercy comfortable. The

clemency of a subject, though never so great, cannot pardon; people may

pity a criminal, while the executioner tortures him, and strips him of

his life; but the clemency of the Supreme Prince establisheth a pardon.

Since we are under the dominion of God, if he pardons, who can reverse

it? if he doth not, what will the pardons of men profit us in regard of

an eternal state? If God be a King forever, then he whom God forgives,

he in whom God reigns, shall live forever; else he would want subjects

on earth, and have none of his lower creatures, which he formed upon

the earth, to reign over after the dissolution of the world; if his

pardons did not stand secure, he would, after this life, have no

voluntary subjects that had formerly a being upon the earth; he would

be a King only over the damned creatures.

3. Corruptions will certainly be subdued in his voluntary subjects.

The covenant, “I will be your God,” implies protection, government,

and relief, which are all grounded upon sovereignty; that, therefore,

which is our greatest burden, will be removed by his sovereign power

(Mic. vii. 19): “He will subdue our iniquities.” If the {b451} outward

enemies of the church shall not bear up against his dominion, and

perpetuate their rebellions unpunished, those within, his people, shall

as little bear up against his throne, without being destroyed by him;

the billows of our own hearts, and the raging waves within us, are

as much at his beck as those without us; and his sovereignty is more

eminent in quelling the corruptions of the heart, than the commotions

of the world in reigning over men’s spirits, by changing them, or

curbing them, more than over men’s bodies, by pinching and punishing

them. The remainders of Satan’s empire will moulder away before him,

since He that is in us is a greater Sovereign “than he that is in the

world” (1 John iv. 4). His enemies will be laid at his feet, and so

never shall prevail against him, when his kingdom shall come. He could

not be Lord of any man, as a happy creature, if he did not, by his

power, make them happy; and he could not make them happy, unless, by

his grace, he made them holy: he could not be praised, as a Lord of

glory, if he did not make some creatures glorious to praise him; and

an earthly creature could not praise him perfectly, unless he had every

grain of enmity to his glory taken out of his heart. Since God is the

only Sovereign, he only can still the commotions in our spirits, and

pull down all the ensigns of the devil’s royalty; he can waste him by

the powerful word of his lips.

4. Hence is a strong encouragement for prayer. “My King,” was the

strong compellation David used in prayer, as an argument of comfort

and confidence, as well as that of “my God” (Ps. v. 2): “Hearken to the

voice of my cry, my King and my God.” To be a king is to have an office

of government and protection: he gives us liberty to approach to him

as the “Judge of all” (Heb. xii. 23), _i. e._ as the Governor of the

world; we pray to one that hath the whole globe of heaven and earth in

his hand, and can do whatsoever he will: though he be higher than the

cherubims, and transcendently above all in majesty, yet we may soar

up to him with the wings of our soul, faith and love, and lay open our

cause, and find him as gracious as if he were the meanest subject on

earth, rather than the most sovereign God in heaven. He hath as much

of tenderness as he hath of authority, and is pleased with prayer,

which is an acknowledgment of his dominion, an honoring of that which

he delights to honor; for prayer, in the notion of it, imports thus

much――that God is the Rector of the world, that he takes notice of

human affairs, that he is a careful, just, wise Governor, a storehouse

of blessing, a fountain of goodness to the indigent, and a relief

to the oppressed. What have we reason to fear when the Sovereign of

the world gives us liberty to approach to him and lay open our case?

that God, who is King of the whole earth, not only of a few villages

or cities in the earth, but the whole earth; and not only King of

this dreggy place of our dross, but of heaven, having prepared, or

established, his throne in the most glorious place of the creation.

5. Here is comfort in affliction. As a sovereign, he is the author

of afflictions; as a sovereign, he can be the remover of them; he can

command the waters of affliction to go so far and no farther. If he

speaks the word, a disease shall depart as soon as a servant shall

{b452} from your presence with a nod; if we are banished from one place,

he can command a shelter for us in another; if he orders Moab, a nation

that had no great kindness for his people, to let “his outcasts dwell

with them,” they shall entertain them, and afford them sanctuary (Isa.

xvi. 4). Again, God chasteneth as a “Sovereign,” but teacheth as a

“Father” (Ps. xcix. 12); the exercise of his authority is not without

an exercise of his goodness; he doth not correct for his own pleasure,

or the creature’s torment, but for the creature’s instruction; though

the rod be in the hand of a sovereign, yet it is tinctured with the

kindness of Divine bowels: he can order them as a sovereign to mortify

our flesh, and try our faith. In the severest tempest, the Lord that

raised the wind against us, which shattered the ship, and tore its

rigging, can change that contrary wind for a more happy one, to drive

us into the port.

6. It is a comfort against the projects of the church’s adversaries in

times of public commotions. The consideration of the Divine sovereignty

may arm us against the threatenings of mighty ones, and the menaces

of persecutors. God hath authority above the crowns of men, and a

wisdom superior to the cabals of men; none can have a step without

him; he hath a negative voice upon their counsels, a negative hand upon

their motions; their politic resolves must stop at the point he hath

prescribed them; their formidable strength cannot exceed the limits he

hath set them; their overreaching wisdom expires at the breath of God:

“There is no wisdom nor understanding nor counsel against the Lord”

(Prov. xxi. 30); not a bullet can be discharged, nor a sword drawn,

a wall battered, nor a person despatched out of the world, without the

leave of God, by the mightiest in the world. The instruments of Satan

are no more free from his sovereign restraint than their inspirer; they

cannot pull the hook out of their nostrils, nor cast the bridle out

of their mouths; this Sovereign can shake the earth, rend the heavens,

overthrow mountains, the most mountainous opposers of his interest.

Though the nations rush in against his people like the rushing of many

waters, “God shall rebuke them, they shall be chased as the chaff of

the mountains before the wind, and like a rolling thing before the

whirlwind” (Isa. xvii. 13); so doth he often burst in pieces the most

mischievous designs, and conducts the oppressed to a happy port: he

often turns the severest tempests into a calm, as well as the most

peaceful calm into a horrible storm. How often hath a well‑rigged ship,

that seemed to spurn the sea under her feet, and beat the waves before

her to a foam, been swallowed up into the bowels of that element,

over whose back she rode a little before! God never comes to deliver

his church as a governor, but in a wrathful posture (Ezek. xx. 33):

“Surely, saith the Lord, with a mighty hand, and with an outstretched

arm, and with fury poured out, will I rule over you;” not with fury

poured out upon the church, but fury poured out upon her enemies, as

the words following evidence: the church he would bring out from the

countries where she was scattered, and bring the people into the bond

of the covenant. He sometimes “cuts off the spirits of princes” (Ps.

lxxvi. 12), _i. e._ cuts off their designs as men do the pipes of a

water‑course. The hearts of all are as open to him {b453} as the riches

of heaven, where he resides; he can slip an inclination into the heart

of the mighty, which they dreamed not of before; and if he doth not

change their projects, he can make them abortive, and waylay them in

their attempts. Laban marched with fury, but God put a padlock on his

passion against Jacob (Gen. xxxi. 24, 29); the devils, which ravage

men’s minds, must be still when he gives out his sovereign orders.

This Sovereign can make his people find favor in the eyes of the cruel

Egyptians, which had so long oppressed them (Exod. xi. 3); and speak a

good word in the heart of Nebuchadnezzar for the prophet Jeremiah, that

he should order his captain to take him into his special protection,

when he took Zedekiah away prisoner in chains, and “put out his eyes”

(Jer. xxxix. 11). His people cannot want deliverance from Him who hath

all the world at his command, when he is pleased to bestow it; he hath

as many instruments of deliverance as he hath creatures at his beck in

heaven or earth, from the meanest to the highest. As he is the Lord of

hosts, the church hath not only an interest in the strength he himself

is possessed with, but in the strength of all the creatures that are

under his command, in the elements below, and angels above. In those

armies of heaven, and in the inhabitants of the earth, he doth “what

he will” (Dan. iv. 35); they are all in order and array at his command.

There are angels to employ in a fatal stroke, lice and frogs to quell

the stubborn hearts of his enemies; he can range his thunders and

lightnings, the cannon and granadoes of heaven, and the worms of the

earth in his service; he can muzzle lions, calm the fury of the fire,

turn his enemies’ swords into their own bowels, and their artillery

on their own breasts; set the wind in their teeth, and make their

chariot‑wheels languish; make the sea enter a quarrel with them, and

wrap them in its waves till it hath stifled them in its lap. The angels

have storms, and tempests, and wars in their hands, but at the disposal

of God; when they shall cast them out against the empire of antichrist

(Rev. vii. 1, 2), then shall Satan be discharged from his throne, and

no more seduce the nations; the everlasting gospel shall be preached,

and God shall reign gloriously in Sion. Let us, therefore, shelter

ourselves in the Divine sovereignty, regard God as the most high in our

dangers and in our petitions. This was David’s resolution (Ps. lvii. 1,

2): “I will cry unto God most high;” this dominion of God is the true

“tower of David, wherein there are a thousand shields” for defence and

encouragement (Cant. iv. 4).

_Use IV._ If God hath an extensive dominion over the whole world,

this ought to be often meditated on, and acknowledged by us. This is

the universal duty of mankind. If he be the Sovereign of all, we should

frequently think of our great Prince, and acknowledge ourselves his

subjects, and him our Lord. God will be acknowledged the Lord of the

whole earth; the neglect of this is the cause of the judgments which

are sent upon the world. All the prodigies were to this end, that they

might know, or acknowledge, that “God was the Lord” (Exod. x. 2); as

God was proprietor, he demanded the first‑born of every Jew, and the

first‑born of every beast; the one was to be redeemed, and the other

sacrificed; this was the quit rent they were to pay to him for their

fruitful land. The first‑fruits of {b454} the earth were ordered to

be paid to him, as a homage due to the landlord, and an acknowledgment

they held all in chief of him. The practice of offering first‑fruits

for an acknowledgment of God’s sovereignty, was among many of the

heathens, and very ancient; hence they dedicated some of the chief of

their spoils, owning thereby the dominion and goodness of God, whereby

they had gained the victory; Cain owned this in offering the fruits

of the earth, and it was his sin he owned no more, _viz._, his being

a sinner, and meriting the justice of God, as his brother Abel did

in his bloody sacrifice. God was a sovereign Proprietor and Governor

while man was in a state of innocence; but when man proved a rebel, the

sovereignty of God bore another relation towards him, that of a Judge,

added to the other. The first‑fruits might have been offered to God in

a state of innocence, as a homage to him as Lord of the manor of the

world; the design of them was to own God’s propriety in all things, and

men’s dependence on him for the influences of heaven in producing the

fruits of the earth, which he had ordered for their use. The design

of sacrifices, and placing beasts instead of the criminal, was to

acknowledge their own guilt, and God as a sovereign Judge; Cain owned

the first, but not the second; he acknowledged his dependence on God

as a Proprietor, but not his obnoxiousness to God as a Judge; which may

be probably gathered from his own speech, when God came to examine him,

and ask him for his brother (Gen. iv. 9): “Am I my brother’s keeper?”

Why do you ask me? though I own thee as the Lord of my land and goods,

yet I do not think myself accountable to thee for all my actions. This

sovereignty of God ought to be acknowledged in all the parts of it, in

all the manifestations of it to the creature; we should bear a sense

of this always upon our spirits, and be often in the thoughts of it in

our retirements; we should fancy that we saw God upon his throne in his

royal garb, and great attendants about him, and take a view of it, to

imprint an awe upon our spirits. The meditation of this would,

1. Fix us on him as an object of trust. It is upon his sovereign

dominion as much as upon anything, that safe and secure confidence

is built; for if he had any superior above him to control him in

his designs and promises, his veracity and power would be of little

efficacy to form our souls to a close adherency to him. It were not fit

to make him the object of our trust that can be gainsayed by a higher

than himself, and had not a full authority to answer our expectations;

if we were possessed with this notion fully and believingly, that God

were high above all, that “his kingdom rules over all,” we should not

catch at every broken reed, and stand gaping for comforts from a pebble

stone. He that understands the authority of a king, would not waive

a reliance on his promise to depend upon the breath of a changeling

favorite. None but an ignorant man would change the security he may

have upon the height of a rock, to expect it from the dwarfishness of

a molehill. To put confidence in any inferior lord more than in the

prince, is a folly in civil converse, but a rebellion in divine; God

only being above all, can only rule all; can command things to help us,

and check other things which we depend on, and make them fall short of

our expectations. {b455} The due consideration of this doctrine would

make us pierce through second causes to the first, and look further

than to the smaller sort of sailors, that climb the ropes, and dress

the sails, to the pilot that sits at the helm, the master, that, by

an indisputable authority, orders all their notions. We should not

depend upon second causes for our support, but look beyond them to the

authority of the Deity, and the dominion he hath over all the works

of his hands (Zech. x. 1): “Ask ye of the Lord rain in the time of the

latter rain;” when the seasons of the year conspire for the producing

such an effect, when the usual time of rain is wheeled about in the

year, stop not your thoughts at the point of the heavens whence you

expect it, but pierce the heavens, and solicit God, who must give order

for it before it comes. The due meditation of all things depending on

the Divine dominion would strike off our hands from all other holds, so

that no creature would engross the dependence and trust which is due to

the First Cause; as we do not thank the heavens when they pour out rain,

so we are not to depend upon them when we want it; God is to be sought

to when the womb of second causes is opened to relieve us, as well

as when the womb of second causes is barren, and brings not forth its

wonted progeny.

2. It would make us diligent in worship. The consideration of God, as

the Supreme Lord, is the foundation of all religion: “Our Father, which

art in heaven,” prefaceth the Lord’s prayer; “Father” is a name of

authority; “in heaven,” the place where he hath fixed his throne, notes

his government; not “my Father,” but “our Father,” notes the extent of

this authority. In all worship we acknowledge the object of our worship

our Lord, and ourselves his vassals; if we bear a sense that he is our

Sovereign King, it would draw us to him in every exigence, and keep us

with him in a reverential posture, in every address; when we come, we

should be careful not to violate his right, but render him the homage

due to his royalty. We should not appear before him with empty souls,

but filled with holy thoughts: we should bring him the best of our

flock, and present him with the prime of our strength; were we sensible

we hold all of him, we should not withhold anything from him which

is more worthy than another. Our hearts would be framed into an awful

regard of him, when we consider that glorious and “fearful name, the

Lord our God” (Deut. xxviii. 58). We should look to our feet when

we enter into his house; if we considered him in heaven upon his

throne, and ourselves on earth at his footstool (Eccles. v. 2), lower

before him than a worm before an angel, it would hinder garnishness

and lightness. The Jews, saith Capel, on 1 Tim. i. 17, repeat this

expression, מלך העולם, King of worlds, or Eternal King; probably the

first original of it might be to stake them down from wandering. When

we consider the majesty of God, clothed with a robe of light, sitting

upon his high throne, adorned with his royal ensigns, we should not

enter into the presence of so great a Majesty with the sacrifice of

fools, with light motions and foolish thoughts, as if he were one of

our companions to be drolled with. We should not hear his word as if it

were the voice of some ordinary peasant. The consideration of majesty

would engender reverence in our service; {b456} it would also make us

speak of God with honor and respect, as of a great and glorious king,

and not use defaming expressions of him, as if he were an infamous

being. And were he considered as a terrible majesty, he would not be

frequently solicited by some to pronounce a damnation upon them upon

every occasion.

The Existence and Attributes of God, Volumes 1 and 2 · 第 140 / 155 段