[3.] It presents us with the strongest motives to obedience (Tit. ii.

11, 12): {a571} “The grace of God teaches us to deny ungodliness.”

What chains bind us faster and closer than love? Here is love to our

nature in his incarnation; love to us, though enemies, in his death

and passion; encouragements to obedience by the proffers of pardon

for former rebellions. By the disobedience of man, God introduceth

his redeeming grace, and engageth his creature to more ingenuous and

excellent returns than his innocent state could oblige him to. In his

created state he had goodness to move him, he hath the same goodness

now to oblige him as a creature, and a greater love and mercy to oblige

him as a repaired creature; and the terror of justice is taken off,

which might envenom his heart as a criminal. In his revolted state

he had misery to discourage him; in his redeemed state he hath love

to attract him. Without such a way, black despair had seized upon the

creature exposed to a remediless misery, and God would have had no

returns of love from the best of his earthly works; but if any sparks

of ingenuity be left, they will be excited by the efficacy of this

argument. The willingness of God to receive returning sinners, is

manifested in the highest degree; and the willingness of a sinner to

return to him in duty hath the strongest engagements. He hath done as

much to encourage our obedience, as to illustrate his glory. We cannot

conceive what could be done greater for the salvation of our souls, and

consequently what could have been done, more to enforce our observance.

We have a Redeemer, as man, to copy it to us, and as God, to perfect us

in it. It would make the heart of any to tremble to wound him that hath

provided such a salve for our sores, and to make grace a warrant for

rebellion――motives capable to form rocks into a flexibleness. Thus is

the wisdom of God seen in giving us a ground to the surest confidence,

and furnishing us with incentives to the greatest obedience, by the

horrors of wrath, death and sufferings of our Saviour.

8. The wisdom of God is apparent in the condition he hath settled for

the enjoying the fruits of redemption: and this is faith, a wise and

reasonable condition and the concomitants of it――

(1.) In that it is suited to man’s lapsed state and God’s glory.

Innocence is not required here; that had been a condition impossible

in its own nature after the fall. The rejecting of mercy is now only

condemning, where mercy is proposed. Had the condition of perfection in

works been required, it had rather been a condemnation than redemption.

Works are not demanded, whereby the creature might ascribe anything

to himself, but a condition, which continues in man a sense of his

apostasy, abates all aspiring pride, and makes the reward of grace,

not of debt; a condition, whereby mercy is owned, and the creature

emptied; flesh silenced in the dust, and God set upon his throne of

grace and authority; the creature brought to the lowest debasement,

and Divine glory raised to the highest pitch. The creature is brought

to acknowledge mercy, and seal to justice; to own the holiness of God,

in the hatred of sin; the justice of God, in the punishment of sin; and

the mercy of God, in the pardoning of sin: a condition that despoils

nature of all its pretended excellency; beats down the glory of man at

the foot of God (1 Cor. i. 29, 31). It subjects the reason and will of

man to the wisdom and authority {a572} of God; it brings the creature

to an unreserved submission and entire resignation. God is made the

sovereign cause of all; the creature continued in his emptiness, and

reduced to a greater dependence upon God than by a creation; depending

upon him for a constant influx, for an entire happiness: a condition

that renders God glorious in the creature, and the fallen creature

happy in God; God glorious in his condescension to man, and man happy

in his emptiness before God. Faith is made the condition of man’s

recovery, that “the lofty looks of man might be humbled, and the

haughtiness of man be pulled down” (Isa. ii. 11); that every towering

imagination might be levelled (2 Cor. x. 5). Man must have all from

without doors; he must not live upon himself, but upon another’s

allowance. He must stand to the provision of God, and be a perpetual

suitor at his gates.

(2.) A condition opposite to that which was the cause of the fall.

We fell from God by an unbelief of the threatening; he recovers us by

a belief of the promise; by unbelief we laid the foundation of God’s

dishonor; by faith, therefore, God exalts the glory of his free grace.

We lost ourselves by a desire of self‑dependence, and our return

is ordered by way of self‑emptiness. It is reasonable we should be

restored in a way contrary to that whereby we fell; we sinned by a

refusal of cleaving to God; it is a part of Divine wisdom to restore

us in a denial of our own righteousness and strength.[797] Man having

sinned by pride, the wisdom of God humbles him (saith one) at the very

root of the tree of knowledge, and makes him deny his own understanding,

and submit to faith, or else, forever to lose his desired felicity.

(3.) It is a condition suited to the common sentiment and custom

of the world. There is more of belief than reason in the world. All

instructors and masters in sciences and arts, require, first a belief

in their disciples, and a resignation of their understandings and wills

to them. And it is the wisdom of God to require that of man, which his

own reason makes him submit to another which is his fellow‑creature. He,

therefore, that quarrels with the condition of faith, must quarrel with

all the world, since belief is the beginning of all knowledge;[798]

yea, and most of the knowledge in the world, may rather come under the

title of belief, than of knowledge; for what we think we know this day,

we may find from others such arguments as may stagger our knowledge,

and make us doubt of that we thought ourselves certain of before: nay,

sometimes we change our opinions ourselves without any instructor,

and see a reason to entertain an opinion quite contrary to what we

had before. And if we found a general judgment of others to vote

against what we think we know, it would make us give the less credit

to ourselves and our own sentiments. All knowledge in the world is

only a belief, depending upon the testimony or arguings of others; for,

indeed, it may be said of all men, as in Job (viii. 9), “We are but of

yesterday, and know nothing.” Since, therefore, belief is so universal

a thing in the world, the wisdom of God requires that of us which

every man must count reasonable, or render himself utterly ignorant of

anything. It is a condition that is common to all religions. All {a573}

religions are founded upon a belief: unless men did believe future

things, they would not hope nor fear. A belief and resignation was

required in all the idolatries in the world; so that God requires

nothing but what a universal custom of the world gives its suffrage to

the reasonableness of: indeed, justifying faith is not suited to the

sentiments of men; but that faith which must precede justifying, a

belief of the doctrine, though not comprehended by reason, is common to

the custom of the world.[799] It is no less madness not to submit our

reason to faith, than not to regulate our fancies by reason.

(4.) This condition of faith and repentance is suited to the

conscience of men. The law of nature teaches us, that we are bound to

believe every revelation from God, when it is made known to us: and

not only to assent to it as true, but embrace it as good. This nature

dictates, that we are as much obliged to believe God, because of his

truth, as to love him, because of his goodness. Every man’s reason

tells him, he cannot obey a precept, nor depend upon a promise, unless

he believes both the one and the other. No man’s conscience but will

inform him, upon hearing the revelation of God concerning his excellent

contrivance of redemption, and the way to enjoy it, that it is very

reasonable he should strip off all affections to sin, lie down in

sorrow, and bewail what he hath done amiss against so tender a God.

Can you expect that any man that promises you a great honor or a rich

donative, should demand less of you than to trust his word, bear an

affection to him, and return him kindness? Can any less be expected

by a prince than obedience from a pardoned subject, and a redeemed

captive? If you have injured any man in his body, estate, reputation,

would you not count it a reasonable condition for the partaking of

his clemency and forgiveness, to express a hearty sorrow for it,

and a resolution not to fall into the like crime again? Such are the

conditions of the gospel, suited to the consciences of men.

(5.) The wisdom of God appears, in that this condition was only

likely to attain the end. There are but two common heads appointed by

God,――Adam and Christ: by one we are made a living soul, by the other

a quickening spirit: by the one we are made sinners, by the other we

are made righteous. Adam fell as a head, and all his members, his whole

issue and posterity, fell with him, because they proceeded from him

by natural generation. But since the second Adam cannot be our head

by natural generation, there must be some other way of engrafting us

in him, and uniting us to him as our Head, which must be moral and

spiritual; this cannot rationally be conceived to be by any other way

than what is suitable to a reasonable creature, and, therefore, must

be by an act of the will, consent and acceptance, and owning the terms

settled for an admission to that union. And this is that we properly

call faith, and, therefore, called a receiving of him (John i. 12).

[1.] Now this condition of enjoying the fruits of redemption could not

be a bare knowledge; for that is but only an act of the understanding,

and doth not in itself include the act of the will, and so would have

united only one faculty to him, not the whole soul: but {a574} faith

is an act both of the understanding and will too; and principally of

the will, which doth presuppose an act of the understanding: for there

cannot be a persuasion in the will, without a proposition from the

understanding. The understanding must be convinced of the truth and

goodness of a thing, before the will can be persuaded to make any

motion towards it; and, therefore, all the promises, invitations,

and proffers, are suited to the understanding and will; to the

understanding in regard of knowledge, to the will in regard of appetite;

to the understanding as true, to the will as good; to the understanding

as practical, and influencing the will.

[2.] Nor could it be an entire obedience. That, as was said before,

would have made the creature have some matter of boasting, and this

was not suitable to the condition he was sunk into by the fall.

Besides, man’s nature being corrupted, was rendered incapable to obey,

and unable to have one thought of a due obedience (2 Cor. iii. 5).

When man turned from God, and upon that was turned out of paradise,

his return was impossible by any strength of his own; his nature was

as much corrupted as his re‑entrance into paradise was prohibited.

That covenant, whereby he stood in the garden, required a perfection of

action and intention in the observance of all the commands of God: but

his fall had cracked his ability to recover happiness by the terms and

condition of an entire obedience; yet man being a person governable by

a law, and capable of happiness by a covenant, if God would restore him,

and enter into a covenant with him, we must suppose it to have some

condition, as all covenants have. That condition could not be works,

because man’s nature was polluted. Indeed, had God reduced man’s

body to the dust, and his soul to nothing, and framed another man,

he might have governed him by a covenant of works: but that had not

been the same man that had revolted, and upon his revolt was stained

and disabled. But suppose God had, by any transcendent grace, wholly

purified him from the stain of his former transgression, and restored

to him the strength and ability he had lost, might he not as easily

have rebelled again? And so the condition would never have been

accomplished, the covenant never have been performed, and happiness

never have been enjoyed. There must be some other condition then in

the covenant God would make for man’s security. Now faith is the most

proper for receiving the promise of pardon of sin: belief of those

promises is the first natural reflection that a malefactor can make

upon a pardon offered him, and acceptance of it is the first consequent

from that belief. Hence is faith entitled a persuasion of, and

embracing the promises (Heb. xi. 13), and a receiving the atonement

(Rom. v. 11). Thus the wisdom of God is apparent in annexing such a

condition to the covenant, whereby man is restored, as answers the end

of God for his glory, the state, conscience, and necessity of man, and

had the greatest congruity to his recovery.

9. This wisdom of God is manifest in the manner of the publishing and

propagating this doctrine of redemption.

(1.) In the gradual discoveries of it. Flashing a great light in the

face of a sudden is amazing; should the sun glare in our eye in all

its brightness on a sudden, after we have been in a thick darkness,

{a575} it would blind us, instead of comforting us: so great a work

as this must have several digestions. God first reveals of what seed

the Redeeming Person should be, “the Seed of the woman” (Gen. iii. 15);

then of what nation (Gen. xxvi. 4); then of what tribe (Gen. xlix.

12),――of the tribe of Judah; then of what family,――the family of David;

then what works he was to do, what sufferings to undergo. The first

predictions of our Saviour were obscure. Adam could not well see the

redemption in the promise for the punishment of death which succeeded

in the threatening; the promise exercised his faith, and the obscurity

and bodily death, his humility. The promise made to Abraham was

clearer than the revelations made before, yet he could not tell how

to reconcile his redemption with his exile. God supported his faith

by the promise, and exercised his humility by making him a pilgrim,

and keeping him in a perpetual dependence upon him in all his motions.

The declarations to Moses are brighter than those to Abraham: the

delineations of Christ by David, in the Psalms, more illustrious

than the former: and all those exceeded by the revelations made to

the prophet Isaiah, and the other prophets, according as the age did

approach wherein the Redeemer was to enter into his office. God wrapped

up this gospel in a multitude of types and ceremonies fitted to the

infant state of the church (Gal. iv. 3). An infant state is usually

affected with sensible things; yet all those ceremonies were fitted

to that great end of the gospel, which he would bring forth in time to

the world. And the wisdom of God in them would be amazing, if we could

understand the analogy between every ceremony in the law and the thing

signified by it: as it cannot but affect a diligent reader to observe

that little account of them we have by the apostle Paul, sprinkled in

his epistles, and more largely in that to the Hebrews. As the political

laws of the Jews flowed from the depth of the moral law, so their

ceremonial did from the depth of evangelical counsels, and all of

them had a special relation to the honor of God, and the debasing

the creature. Though God formed the mass and matter of the world at

the first creation at once, yet his wisdom took six days time for the

disposing and adorning it. The more illustrious truths of God are not

to be comprehended on a sudden by the weakness of men. Christ did not

declare all truths to his disciples in the time of his life, because

they were not able at that present to bear them (John xvi. 12): “Ye

cannot bear them now;” some were reserved for his resurrection, others

for the coming of the Spirit, and the full discovery of all kept back

for another world. This doctrine God figured out in the law, oracled

by the prophets, and unveiled by Christ and his apostles.

(2.) The wisdom of God appeared in using all proper means to render the

belief of it easy.

[1.] The most minute things that were to be transacted were predicted

in the ancient foregoing age, long before the coming of the Redeemer.

The vinegar and gall offered to him upon the cross, the parting his

garments, the not breaking of his bones, the piercing of his hands and

feet, the betraying of him, the slighting of him by the multitude, all

were exactly painted and represented in variety of figures. There was

light enough to good men not to mistake {a576} him, and yet not so

plain as to hinder bad men from being serviceable to the counsels of

God in the crucifying of him when he came.

[2.] The translation of the Old Testament from the private language of

the Jews, into the most public language of the world; that translation

which we call Septuagint, from Hebrew into Greek, some years before

the coming of Christ, that tongue being most diffused at that time,

by reason of the Macedonian empire, raised by Alexander, and the

university of Athens, to which other nations resorted for learning

and education. This was a preparation for the sons of Japhet to “dwell

in the tents of Shem.” By this was the entertainment of the gospel

facilitated; when they compared the prophesies of the Old Testament

with the declarations of the New, and found things so long predicted

before they were transacted in the public view.

[3.] By ordering concurrent testimonies, as to matter of fact, that

the matter of fact was not deniable. That there was such a person as

Christ, that his miracles were stupendous, that his doctrine did not

incline to sedition, that he affected not worldly applause, that he

did suffer at Jerusalem, was acknowledged by all; not a man among the

greatest enemies of Christians was found that denied the matter of fact.

And this great truth, that Christ is the Messiah and Redeemer, hath

been with universal consent owned by all the professors of Christianity

throughout the world: whatever bickerings there have been among them

about some particular doctrines, they all centred in that truth of

Christ’s being the Redeemer. The first publication of this doctrine was

sealed by a thousand miracles, and so illustrious, that he was an utter

stranger to the world that was ignorant of them.

[4.] In keeping up some principles and opinions in the world to

facilitate the belief of this, or render men inexcusable for rejecting

of it. The incarnation of the son of God could not be so strange to

the world, if we consider the general belief of the appearances[800]

of their gods among them; that the Epicureans and others, that denied

any such appearances, were counted atheists.[801] And Pythagoras was

esteemed to be one, not of the inferior genii and lunar demons, but one

of the higher gods, who appeared in a human body, for the curing and

rectifying mortal life;[802] and himself tells Abaris, the Scythian,

that he was ἀνθρωπόμορφος, that he “took the flesh of man,” that

men might not be astonished at him, and in a fright fly from his

instructions. It was not therefore accounted an irrational thing

among them, that God should be incarnate: but, indeed, the great

stumbling‑block was a crucified God. But had they known the holy and

righteous nature of God, the malice of sin, the universal corruption of

human nature, the first threatening, and the necessity of vindicating

the honor of the law, and clearing the justice of God, the notion of

his crucifixion would not have appeared so incredible, since they

believed the possibility of an incarnation.

Another principle was that universal one of sacrifices for

expiation, and rendering God propitious to man, and was practised among

{a577} all nations. I remember not any wherein this custom did not

prevail; for it did even among those people where the Jews, as being

no trading nation, had not any commerce; and also in America, found out

in these latter ages. It was not a law of nature; no man can find any

such thing written in his own heart, but a tradition from Adam. Now

that among the loss of so many other doctrines that were handed down

from Adam to his immediate posterity, as, in particular, that of the

“Seed of the woman,” which one would think a necessary appendix to that

of sacrificing, this latter should be preserved as a fragment of an

ancient tradition, seems to be an act of Divine wisdom, to prepare

men for the entertainment of the doctrine of the great Sacrifice for

the expiation of the sin of the world. And as the apostle forms his

argument from the Jewish sacrifices, in the epistle to the Hebrews,

for the convincing them of the end of the death of Christ, so did the

ancient fathers make use of this practice of the heathen to convince

them of the same doctrine.

[5.] The wisdom of God appeared in the time and circumstances of the

first solemn publication of the gospel by the apostles at Jerusalem.

The relation you may read in Acts ii. 1‒12. The Spirit was given to the

apostles on the day of Pentecost; a time wherein there were multitudes

of Jews from all nations, not only near, but remote, that heard the

great things of God spoken in the several languages of those nations

where their habitations were fixed, and that by twelve illiterate

men, that two or three hours before knew no language but that of

their native country. It was the custom of the Jews, that dwelt among

other nations, at a distance from Jerusalem, to assemble together at

Jerusalem at the feast of Pentecost: and God pitched upon this season,

that there might be witnesses of this miracle in many parts of the

world: there were some of every nation under heaven (ver. 5); that is,

of that known part of the world, so saith the text. Fourteen several

nations are mentioned; and proselytes as well as Jews by birth. They

are called “devout men,” men of conscience, whose testimony would carry

weight with it among their neighbors at their return, because of their

reputation by their religious carriage. Again, this was not heard and

seen by some of them at one time, and some at another, by some one

hour, by others the next successively,[803] but altogether, in a solemn

assembly, that the testimony of so many witnesses at a time, might be

more valid, and the truth of the doctrine appear more illustrious and

undeniable. And it must needs be astonishing to them, to hear that

person magnified in so miraculous a manner, who had so lately been

condemned by their countrymen as a malefactor. Wisdom consists in

the timing of things. And in this circumstance doth the wisdom of God

appear, in furnishing the apostles with the Spirit at such a time, and

bringing forth such a miracle, as the gift of tongues, on a sudden,

that every nation might hear in their own language the wonder of

redemption, and as witnesses at their returns into their own countries,

report it to others; that the credit they had, in their several places,

might facilitate the belief and entertainment of the gospel, when

the apostles, or others, should arrive to those several charges

and dioceses {a578} appointed for them to preach the gospel in. Had

this miracle been wrought in the presence only of the inhabitants of

Judea, that understood only their own language, or one or two of the

neighboring tongues, it had been counted by them rather a madness than

a miracle. Or had they understood all the tongues which they spoke,

the news of it had spread no further than the limits of their own

habitations, and had been confined within the narrow bounds of the land

of Judea. But now it is carried to several remote nations, where any

of those auditors then assembled had their residence. As God chose the

time of the Passover for the death of Christ, that there might be the

greatest number of the inhabitants of the country, as witnesses of the

matter of fact, the innocence and sufferings of Christ, so he chose the

time of Pentecost for the first publishing the value and end of this

blood to the world. Thus the evangelical law was given in a confluence

of people from all parts and nations, because it was a covenant with

all nations: and the variety of languages spoken by a company of poor

Galileans, bred up at the lake of Tiberias, and in poor corners of

Canaan, without the instructions of men for so great a skill, might

well evidence to the hearers, that God that brought the confusion of

languages first at Babel, did only work that cure of them, and combine

all together at Jerusalem.

The Existence and Attributes of God, Volumes 1 and 2 · 第 75 / 155 段